TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

seanicasxc Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by seanicasxc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This is a terrible idea and ignores the laws concerning equitable distribution. The judge would simply pierce the corporate veil and distribute the assets accordingly. Typically, courts can hear both family and contract disputes - so there is no jurisdictional argument.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:43 PM
-1

Up next: Taxes are theft.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:30 PM
0

I don't think the amount of information someone receives in a search is relevant to the privacy interest. You need to read the statute (and opinion) - you are only allowed to cheek swap if have been arraigned on a serious felony.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:24 PM
-1

Not really a shocking precedent. No different than taking fingerprints.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:43 PM
3

Rape can be "easier" given the changes to the rules of evidence and rape victim.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:49 PM
2

Can we stop trotting out the "abandonment/adoption" arguments? My state will actually try to find the father through a variety of means - birth certificate, putative DNA registry, and special registries for missing people. In my experiences, the father has usually been told by mother that she plans on giving away the kid. If the father bothers to search at all for the child, the state will find him and try to place the child with him. A mother leaving out a father’s name does not destroy his rig…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:21 PM
1

No, my idea is that a man should grow up and act/think like an adult. You can quit your job, even if you pay child support. Are there consequences to that action? Yes. If I quit my job, stop paying rent, and get kicked out, is my landlord a slavemaster? You suggest that men should only have pay child support if certain arbitrary conditions are met. The state, according to you, shouldn’t bother to ask what parent is actually better at raising the children – we should look to see who filed for div…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:08 PM
0

I take that as a "no, I concede."
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:05 PM
0

No - the father still has rights to the child even if the mother abandons it anonymously. You need to find me a source that says anonymous abandonment by one parent surrenders the others rights.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:14 PM
-1

that's nice. your justification does nothing to void what i asserted. That's not my justification, its the State's. Do you think Safe Haven laws are designed to curtail men's rights? Please cite some real, actual sources. most states don't take any measure of effort to ensure a child being abandoned has a father wanting it. Do you have any real, actual sources for that? Id love to read the case law and statutory law about this.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:57 PM
-1

Sigh. Safe Haven laws are designed for the safety of the child. Parents were leaving unwanted babies in the forest/trash cans where they died. States decided that keeping a baby safe and alive was worth the father (temporarily) not knowing that his child had been surrendered. Feel free to read my other post: I am a lawyer. I do pro bono work (usually as a GAL) a few times a year for children in abandonment procedures. In most (10 out of 11 so far) abandonment cases the father is long gone before…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:55 PM
1

What you describe is modern day slavery, and I don't mean figuratively, but literally. Being forced to support your children is the new slavery? This is why no one takes MRA's seriously. You can quit jobs for valid reasons (health,etc.) and the judge won't impute income. It does matter because we cannot incentivise people to divorce, and we must not reward divorce initiators for "family theft". It is a hair-raising idea that people are free to rob others of their children and then extort them fo…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:51 PM
-1

Abortion concerns the ability of a woman to chose what she does to her body. Financial abortions are based on . . . a man choosing not support a child he conceived?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:40 PM
-1

Actually, it is. Also, you are wrong about safe haven laws and kidnapping. Educate yourself. I suggest starting with some of other posts in this thread.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:33 PM
1

It may not be frequent, but (as you concede), it happens. Again, if a non-custodial parent quits his job and takes a lower-paying position even if he could work elsewhere at his previous salary, his income should be imputed to the higher amount. I realize that I am in a minority here, but I actually think American/Western family law is in a good place. We are moving away from life-time alimony awards and prenuptial agreements are becoming more and more favored. Your ideas are bad. This is dumb f…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:17 PM
-1

Everyone also knows that sex, even safe sex, can lead to children. A man can choose not have sex, as can a woman. Explain to me how this not equal?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:59 PM
1

I am a lawyer. I do pro bono work (usually as a GAL) a few times a year for children in abandonment procedures. In most (10 out of 11 so far) abandonment cases the father is long gone before the birth of the child. My state will actually try to find the father through a variety of means - birth certificate, putative DNA registry, and special registries for missing people. In my experiences, the father has usually been told by mother that she plans on giving away the kid. If the father bothers to…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:54 PM
-1

No, I'm pretty sure both parties have a binary choice - yes or no. A man can choose not sleep with a woman, and vice versa. Its no secret that sex - even protected sex - can lead to children. The parties are equal in that choice.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:06 PM
1

Adoption cannot happen without terminating the Father's parental rights. Abandonment lets either party walk away from their obligations. If the Mother abandons the child, the Father will become the primary custodial parent. Both adoption and abandonment laws have a common thread: both laws look to further the best interests of the minor children. Abortion is founded on the right to privacy. What privacy interest does a "financial abortion" protect? How does a "financial abortion" further the bes…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:03 PM
2

Emotions, such as anger from being "raped spectacularly badly" may make a man do this. Sounds like you and I agree - emotional decisions, such as quitting your job out of spite, should not qualify for a reduction in child support.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:57 PM
-1

Both parties choose to sleep with the other. Nothing unequal about that.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:37 PM
1

Roe v. Wade (in short) is founded on the basis of personal privacy; the right to chose what medical procedures to perform on one's body. There is no credible legal basis for financial abortions.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:37 PM
1

It happens. Imputed income is also applied when a woman won't/doesn't work - so it goes both ways. This isn't misandry - this is the law reacting to a problem that existed.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:26 PM
2

Doesn't duress go right to the heart of whether someone intended to be bound by an agreement?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:53 PM
1

I'd like a source to this, please.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:52 PM
0

There isn't one. No one will successfully argue such a thing. Its probably among the dumbest "arguments" MRA put out. Want to be taken seriously? Stop trotting out this argument.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:50 PM
3

The custodial parent receives payment from the non-custodial parent. The amount is usually per month and is (usually) derived from a percentage of the non-custodial's income. Joint custody is not shield to child support payments - child support exists so that the child can as though the parents were together.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:46 PM
0

Voluntary agreements must be subject to review by the Courts - the beneficiary of the agreement, after all, is a child. Imputed income is also a necessity. What are you going to if a man who made 100k a year as a IT manager quits his job for the sole purpose of lowering CS payments?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:41 PM
2

Good response. Thank you. Have no idea why are being down-voted.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:39 PM
4

The state has an interest in making sure the children are provided for by their Father. The legislation exists because, shockingly, people who get divorced may not get along later - the legislation protects children in that scenario.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:38 PM
3

Men's Rights at is finest.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:32 PM
0

I think people are confusing cause and effect - a man doesn't have some magical power that causes children to behave. I suspect it has more to do with greater access to resources and stability than the sex of the parents.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 11:02 PM
0

He won't have to pay child support unless he voluntarily adopts the children.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:56 PM
2

Actually, providing a false age might be a valid defense.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:54 PM
1

Polygraphs aren't admissible in Court for any offense. Or in civil cases.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:52 PM
1

Law has no place here. The only facts are the man's facts.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:51 PM
1

Is this the "intelligent, logical" arguments that MRA use now?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:27 AM
4

You do realize none of those statistics show that a man's civic rights are being violated, correct?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:02 PM
1

I am a Tennessee lawyer. I primarily practice in western Tennessee. I've seen both men and women get custody of their children. Do women get custody more often then men? Sure. Do I believe that there is some conspiracy against men? No. Judges here give both parties a fair shot and I have never encountered a judge that will railroad a man. Family law is less law and more facts. This is what I think happened: your case isn't as strong as you suspected it was. The "I did everything right! I'm perfe…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:57 PM
1

It’s clear that parental alienation is a basis for custody change. So is the inability to comply with a parenting schedule. If you are so sure you can prove these things, why not ask for custody? It sounds like you have a good case.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:48 PM
1

You do not understand how child support is derived and the reason for its existence. Child support exists so that the child is not deprived of both parent’s resources. Child support exists for the support of the child. The child should be able to live it’s as if the parents were still united. CS is calculated through a flat percentage or formula based on both parties’ income. Its no secret that women (for a variety of reasons, none of which are important here) get paid less than men. The conclus…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:47 PM
0

There shouldn't be preference for any sort of gender-based custody. There are plenty of well-thought reasons for the current system. You may not like the laws as the are written, but they are well thought out and logical.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:28 PM
1

Well, former spouses typically do not get along - that is why they are former spouses.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:25 PM
0

Anything less than 50/50 isn't keeping the father out of the child's life. The concern in child custody laws are the welfare of the child, not father's "rights." Aggressive parenting and alienating a parent can lead to a change of custody.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:17 AM
1

50/50 works fine until the child has to go to school. Even when the ex-parents get along great, there are problems - logistics, you have to keep two households worth of supplies, makes vacation planning harder, etc
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:14 AM
1

Please do not take this advice. Your soon-to-be-ex knows a lot of information about you - more than you think. Hiding assets will get you slammed in Court.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:39 PM
6

Practicing lawyer; 50/50 plans are actually a bad idea - you are basically encouraging instability in a child's life. I've never seen them end particularly well. Can they work? Sure. But they often end badly.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter