TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

seanrk924 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by seanrk924 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Companionship and children
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:27 PM
2

They all are 1 sided, hence my initial skepticism
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:43 PM
2

Which would be a question of fact determined by the court where both sides get to testify and submit evidence. A slightly more intensive inquiry than a 1 sided Reddit post.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:36 PM
3

And this circles back to his contributions during the marriage. Despite her post, did he take care of the house and kids to such an extent that it freed up her time to pursue a professional degree or certification? Could she focus on her business while he was not afforded time to expand his? Was this a marital decision to optimize their lifestyle? Trying to unwind 2 individuals that were a single legal entity is tricky and messy, especially when emotions are driving the parties to embellish them…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:27 PM
3

At the end of the day, even if this prenup is valid (unlikely), then it still can't be unconscionable to be enforceable. Even more so than USA, Canada is not likely to enforce a prenup when it essentially condemns 1 party to live at or below poverty when the other party gets to enjoy the lifestyle of a millionaire. Especially when the would be disadvantaged party became accustomed to living the millionaire lifestyle as well. A government isn't going to basically create a ward of the state when t…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:55 PM
3

It's a firm in NJ, but the legal principles btw USA and Canada are very similar as they each descend from English common law... Was this couple in Canada? I might have missed that.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:25 PM
3

A whole other can of worms at the crux of your argument.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:22 PM
3

Also, I'll just leave this here
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:43 PM
4

By her own admission, a dubious prenup at best.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:39 PM
6

I'm naturally cynical of all, but especially posts that beggar belief. There's the old saying that "behind every successful man is a good woman" and I think a modern interpretation of it should be updated for any successful married person with kids ("behind every successful married person is a good spouse"). I just can't imagine that this person accomplished all of this while their spouse contributed next to nothing. And once you accept that, how is it equitable to not give her husband half of t…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:30 PM
8

This is assuming she's not casting herself in the best light and that the husband is a deadbeat. She's operating this wildly successful biz and doing all the house work and raising the kids all on her lonesome? Very doubtful. He's most likely contributing much more than she's letting on. Not sure which arena it's in, but c'mon, this lady is operating a six figure biz while being a FT home maker and raising 2 kids, including 1 that isn't hers. Mother Theresa reincarnated.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:23 PM
4

I'm fairly certain that that sub is dominated by fat & ugly chicks who are internet cosplaying on how they imagine hot chicks behave and think. Since they're basically female incels themselves and don't realize that, hot or not, decent people don't approach life like the plastics clique in that Lindsay Lohan Mean Girls flix, their left with describing the traits of a so-called high value man and ohh boy, what they come up with is basically Christian Bales' character from American Psycho: attract…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 12:15 AM
10

The "strategy" promoted by the FDS sub appears to be the opposite of what I would call the ideals of original feminism, i.e. independence, self sufficiency and equality. Instead, fds is shooting for turning the tables on those evil low value men and extracting as much as possible whilst giving little to nothing in return, preferably nothing.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:37 PM
7

You shouldn't have to explain this. If they can't acknowledge basic human suffering without their prejudiced lense of "men bad woman good" then they're hardly worth any discussion beyond basic pleasantries like "hi", "weather has been X lately" and "bye".
/r/MensRights26/12/21 12:53 AM
7

Whenever I've had discussions with women along these lines, most dismiss the notion of ever dating a "so-called" bi-sexual man because "any guy who has sucked a dick is totally gay". Also, it's bad enough having to worry about your man with other women and they can't fathom the idea of having to worry about all other guys being seductive to them as well.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 01:15 PM
11

Wolves in sheep's clothing waiting for the most opportune moment to strike.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:45 AM
16

I've always loved that Jack Nicholson line from As Good As It Gets explaining how he, a male author, writes woman so well: "I think of a man, and then I remove reason and accountability".
/r/MensRights21/12/21 03:25 AM
1

Is this crown a twat in your instance or just simping for twats?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:21 PM
10

If you helped finance her degree, you might have a claim to her future earnings. Lawyer up bro.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 12:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter