TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

secret-poster67 Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by secret-poster67 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

not that hard if you're tracking well enough. spookyputin first says that in fact current language used isn't actually trying to make that distinction any longer eg "patriarchy" and "men" are made interchangeable. you just go on to respond with a so? and imply that essentially "if youre not part of problem, then don't worry." the bell hooks quote stresses the need to make sure such a distinction. if others especially other women are going around not caring about making that distinction in the la…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 08:40 AM

i wish men knew how lame male attention is. why would we ever think our attention is lame? you would have to hate your identity as a man to come to such a lame ass opinion. actual brainwashing would be us coming to that fck ass opinion about our own attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:24 AM

I agree that I think men should serve women. justify that even remotely cuz that one fckin sentence made me actually throw up in my mouth from reading it. you can yap all day long about how your sht doesn't actually stink all you want but sht is still sht. it still stinks. the paragraph you wrote trying to argue otherwise doesn't change that. you think men should serve women, congrats on establishing a role reserved "manosphere" talking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:14 AM

there isn't one so why would i ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:12 AM

So? looks like you also victim to said quote. nice pot calling kettle black moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:11 AM

X isn't every Y's reality as a truism that doesn't seem have enough consistent applicability in this sub, especially when we talk female-related issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:10 AM

im the opposite. most women im convinced based on my experiences are very simplistic black and white thinkers where the men in my life can and often do think much more complexly and in a nuanced manner. its really frustrating and another why dating sucks cuz i really need a woman who's on my level of thinking and it's always incredibly difficult no matter where i can look. genuinely very terrifying to witness on a regular basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:01 AM

Look how bitter they are about af/bb i swear people's opinions about that shit is a sure fire litmus test. calling a guy "bitter" for finding out he's now eligible for a woman's affection but only now when she's trying to settle down and not before when she was younger and going for pure physical and mental chemistry tells me everything i need to know about the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:46 AM

the red flags: ... everything treated as transactional. It's really not romantic to sit and talk about "hey, you want kids, then i want to be paid for being pregnant and lets decide how we separate costs for doctor visits and birth, i want to be paid for looking after child, because if i won't we would've paid a nanny, so i'll take half of market value for it...." etc. i would expect a guy who is so transactional to be selfish as fuck ... can't make this stuff up even i tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:27 AM

The manosphere online loves to worship this brand of masculinity where the woman serves the man, but when I think of traditional masculinity, I honestly think of my father. .... exists in service to his woman. ... who has been married to my mother for 40 years now, he is all about his wife. sounds like the only sin that the "manosphere" committed wasnt that of servitude but rather who's supposed to serve whom. they say women should serve, allegedly. you seem to think that it's the opposite, that…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:23 AM

y'all just don't actually use the phrase 50/50 correctly like at all, especially if you have that blue pill tag under your username. that's fundamentally the problem. looking back, she not recognizes the red flags: a rigid 50/50 arrangement, no generosity, everything treated as transactional. your entire post is just nonsensical for the sheer fact that you and quite frankly every single female commenter keeps failing to do and that is, is post an example, real or hypothetical, of an actual "50/5…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:15 AM

clearly more to it than that. let's not be disingenuous now though i suppose for this sub with certain pill tags, that might be a tall order.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 03:53 AM

cuz that's not what they want ultimately, you silly goose. "hey guys since you're all gonna be stuck bein a chopped as dogsht bitchless fat stinky chud forever, why don't you just kill any kind of sexual inclination you have in your entire existence so you can't make this sht anyone else's problem anymore? that's basically what you sound like. it so weirdly i don't know dehumanizing in a strange way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:26 PM
1

this total non conversation about a private message between two fckin nobodies none of us knew even existed like three days ago is such peak internet dating/romance topic nonsense. bro didn't do a single iota thing wrong at all, as far as what was in the memo.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:22 PM
2

why would making fucking him a prerequisite for continued dating be like at all threatening? you just don't get to go on any more dates with him or any like minded guy if youre not down to fuck expeditiously. not being allowed to continue dating said guy simply isn't a threat of any kind. just stop diluting the meaning of words like that so you can add empty emotional weight to your criticisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:12 PM
5

"his no-game having ass." 🫩 ...............
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:01 PM
1

ultimately it doesn't seem like it matters if someone like you specifically wouldn't cuz im assuming op is of the mindset that if you won't, the next girl after most likely will.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 10:54 PM
2

you constantly confuse being challenging with being a brick wall of a human being. someone refusing to engage with a human brick wall isnt helpless, it's the very definition of helping oneself. i suspect that you'll express such confusion yet agree with my comment here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 12:27 AM
0

dishonesty is gender specific if the type of dishonesty we're talkin about is low-balling how many sexual partners you've had. women disproportionally low-ball their numbers more than men, so hence it bein gender specific. men tend to high-ball it for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 12:10 AM
2

ive seen op here act like this multiple times across several posts. you cannot help the helpless. you honestly saw how pointless it was arguing with a human equivalent of a brick wall and decided to just discontinue the conversation. that's all you can do in a sub like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:56 PM
0

i never understood this notion calling chores you do "unpaid labor". its sounds so chillingly transactional. if you follow the logic all the down, all parents at least in the US would be guilty violating child labor laws for making their children "work" at all when theyre underage whilst also not properly compensating them financially for their "labor". trying to gameify just basic living is such a corny loser mentality. complain if you must about not having someone doing their fair share of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:34 PM

fun fact bro, they're proving your exact point in this comment thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:17 PM

talkin bout sum, "are you good?", be fckin for real, nothing about your insanely ridiculous and yes extremely simpish comment above was ever intended to be limited to "the women who happen the mother of your children". you wholeheartedly just meant women in general. that makes objectively stupid and simp like. and you go on to prove my point here, rocks-for-brains nope there is no such thing as 50/50 because you will never have a child come out ur nether regions i don't give to a thousand flying…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:00 PM
-1

this is literally you just internalizing the idea of being a fckin simp. you seriously got on here with your full chest and said this genuinely ridiculous clown sht with all sincerity? all women can go on worrying about menstruating, constantly worrying about threats to bodily autonomy, and exclusively deal with the problems of pregnancy and it would still be completely totally undeniably reasonable to expect all women to go 50/50 financially and domestically, especially if she makes her own mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:24 PM
1

this kind of reply is insane and purposely is done cuz you just don't have anything else to say as a rebuttal. your last sentence in your original comment is especially funny cuz it is exactly demonstrating the point of op's post in first place. if those same hypothetical women wouldnt want to ever meet the man they just went on a date with again cuz god forbid they had to pony up, that is a red fckin flag that you should have a problem with unless you yourself carry this red flag so are the pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:18 PM
0

you're getting cooked for this laughable reply so naturally all you can do is just lash out irrationally at the men who are doin the critiquing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:12 PM

similarly if a man .... this post isn't critical about men, that is a whataboutism. its exclusively about women's choices. just stick to that. men also go through ... again this post is exclusively centered around women's choices. stop engaging in whataboutism. blue pill and purple pill women, please stop engaging in whataboutism when a post exclusively critical of women. its hypocritical and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:16 PM

how about people .... how bout not, bro? y'all blue piller women just dont like exclusively women-centered critical posts. y'all eat up like rabid dogs when its exclusively men-centered critical posts. when you can't get that, you demand that the posts be framed as egalitarian, as critical of both genders. the answer is no, this post is about criticism of women's choices and not about men. you need to deal with that without throwing a fit and engaging in whataboutism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:10 PM

better as in how? and why is this "getting better" advice almost never reciprocal? if i one-hundredth of a penny for everytime a woman suggested that a guy engage in a long list of do this do that and wine and dine her and get her gifts and yada yada yada just so maybe she'll finally be willing to that fifteen minutes of ok sex but when she randomly is in the mood to have sex, all she feels she should do is rub up against him and he doesn't respond positively, she's gonna go pout about it like a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:01 PM
1

(there are men like this too) the obligatory "let's also include men cuz we can't just focus only on women alone ever" point. just make the first dates inexpensive. inexpensive for whom? the girl or the guy? tell them it's all about getting to know them and if they are interested they could stick around. that can all be done without the man ever having to be the sole financial contributor to the first date or any date, which is what op is arguing about in the first place, in case you'd forgot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 06:17 PM
1

my comment doesn't even apply to you if you were in fact picking up the tab before someone even had a job to pay for things. its for folks who are in fact bein hypocrites for saying it is nice and kind and generous to do so but they themselves will never do so and yet somehow that doesn't mean that they aren't cheap and unlike and not generous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:25 AM
1

yeah im not taking this rule for thee but not for me sht seriously anymore. what's good for the goose is in fact good for the gander. no lady out here gets to sht test for cheapness whilst bein cheap as hell herself. if she gets pregnant in the future .... not excuse to bein cheap herself prior to that. she could think you still be too controlling when it comes to finances. she should worry about me thinking about her being so dang cheap and miserly so early on in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:16 AM
1

oh expectations on what partners should provide? good thing it is expected for her to provide for herself on those first few dates then. thanks for clearly that up, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:11 AM
1

not talkin bout me and what i want. im talking about who you had in mind when you posted your top comment. im assuming you had women paying for the first dates in mind when you suggested that they should be inexpensive so as to be more affordable to them, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:00 AM
2

just pay for the first date. Making a big deal about it makes you look cheap. also you ... Women like men who can step up into the provider role. cool than, your initial post is fckin pointless than. nice contribution bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:58 PM
2

women are expensive? like what, like a car or a dog? or like a child? also they have jobs so that expensiveness is covered thankfully. if picking a woman is about affordability, like im at an auction picking up livestock, that doesnt seem to bode well as an impression that you applying to women. how bout this, ill pick whoever the fck i want and when she says yes, she can go on ahead and pay for whatever it is that she should pay for and ill do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:54 PM
1

you might be not straight. that's the vibe im getting from blue pill women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:46 PM
1

that's sounds great, it will be a lot more affordable for women to cover when they're paying for these dates, right? that is what you meant by providing these suggestions, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:44 PM
1

this isn't a good argument .... it is. you're just coping about revealing it is. there are so many women who support jobless husband and boyfriends for years. red herring. the first date is about him demonstrating provision. says you? the first date is actually about her demonstrating initiation and reciprocity. you need to screen for the sht you care about with your own methods, not try to rewrite women's. one, quit being a petulant child thinking women can collectively somehow copyright a dati…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:28 PM
3

no, also hypocritical. if one's refusal to pay makes one look cheap, than any woman including op who has and is refusing to pony up cash to cover a guy's meal is just cheap as hell then, according to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:20 PM
2

why even for the first few at all? ive never heard an argument for this that didnt just boiled down to hypocrisy and/or preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:08 PM
0

People who score high on measures of agreeableness are empathetic and self-sacrificing ... A man who is willing to pay for the woman is less selfish and more self-sacrificing and cares more about her feelings so therefore what? large portion of women who also refuse to and make a big stink about their refusal to pay for dates they have with men are also extremely selfish and not self-sacrificing and dont care at all about the feelings of the guy that they're dating? Is that what you're trying to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:06 PM

no theyre not. holy fucking basement dwelling morbidly obese loser take. take shower, go outside, and be a normal fucking human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:50 AM

not an insult just a helpful suggestion to weed out the insufferables.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:47 AM

bro why didnt you say so in advance? now this post makes so much more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:46 AM

no it hasnt. there is no credible body of research that even remotely suggests that men are "the more emotional ones by default". just straight vomiting sht from your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:36 AM

so .... youre a sexual predator. failed to see how you didn't explicitly call yourself a sexual predator. go on ahead and claim your label.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:34 AM
8

id expect to see a collective female ego death on par with the one you're expecting men to go through.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:30 AM

holy fckin high horse there bud. any higher and you'd be floating in outer space.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:22 AM
0

leaving cuz you're not getting hard earned paychecks immediately spent on you? have you even considered spending any money on the guy preemptively without it bein you reciprocating a gesture done towards you first? if not, why would a guy? waiting a couple months just to have sex why should a guy have to do that? why is that any more respectable than just fckin straight before the first date? also women will fck dudes plenty times and for multiple weeks, months, even years before a date is even …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 04:16 AM

"cranky guys offering zero-effort dates" if i had a penny for every time a woman complained about zero effort dates despite never bein the one who has to make the plans keeping in mind that it has to be affordable and impressive, possibly arrange transportation, facilitate the date, cover the date, and etc. all whilst maintaining cool nerves and managing anxiety, i'd truly be richer than a million jeff bezoses. complaining about zero effort when all youre presumably obligated to do is just fresh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:59 AM

i dont see women who choose not to get pregnant have to get that 100 stitches nonsense either. you don't get to complain about biology not makin pregnancy, an entirely voluntary decision no mind you, a walk in the park. take it up with god and/or evolution. that's like a dude complaining about how insanely difficult it is to work on oil rig and how he wishes that he wouldnt have to endure such suffering, meanwhile workin on a rig is entirely a voluntary act. he could just quit or never even chos…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 05:41 AM
1

called it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 04:57 AM
1

how often do you run by a terms and conditions sort of conversation with dudes you're about to go on a date with? i have to imagine female commenters on subs like this will probably say all of the time but realistically no one irl who touches grass regularly does so. its fine to just go on the date, sus these things out in real time, and if need be pull the rip cord out when the date has proved difficult. also callin rightful complaints "pathetic and just whining for the sake of whining" is just…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 01:17 PM
1

does sht have to be a "moral failing" on the part of someone's choice of conduct for said choice of conduct to be worth complaining/critiquing about? why does a man complaints about dating women get so moralized by women as if complaining is somehow a moral indictment? no wait let me guess, a subset portion of dudes do some moralizing with their complaints so therefore let's extrapolate unfairly to most guys complaints. that tends to be the go-to excuse. also minor flaw in your rant here. depend…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:22 PM
2

are you bein so confrontational about a simple question relevant to your post? are you trying to have a conversation or are you just interested in preaching to the choir? like why the antagonism? you can also just say idk look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:02 PM
1

so you say. i guess since anonymous redditor says theyre swimmin in it then it must be true. im not that gullible. provide actual receipts. also it aint "skill issue" lil bro if the other side aint even playin in good faith. you're not even arguing in good faith, surprise surprise there. yet again didnt even bother to address anything i said whatsoever. address what i actually have said with substantive replies that either concede what i am sayin or effectively critique what i am sayin. dont com…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:23 PM
1

yeah nice use of rage bait at the end with the set you on fire nonsense. real fckin unnecessary which seems on brand for reddit tier level debates. also didn't answer anything i actually said. do you just enjoy shilling out for endless dates for women who regularly keep ending things with you after a couple dates despite you feeling things are goin good and would want to keep seein them? if so keep that kink over there on your side. i don't feel like tryin it out for myself. also many straight w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:13 PM
1

i swear you guys are all so weird about all of this. its literally the definition of its not that deep. if by dream girl you mean a woman that its very physically attractive to him who is also very explicitly and outwardly very affectionate, very fun to be with, kind, considerate, huge on initiating and mutual reciprocation, etc. than yeah payin in full on the first date is an extremely easy thing to do cuz you don't have to worry about the usual fallout of doin things for a woman whose just gon…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:58 PM

"its okay for me to evaluate my partner. same as for him" "But that level of obsession isn't really about being desired." these two statements seem a lil incongruent with one another, as if this "competition" style approach to dating and relationships that you purport men as having isn't a legitimate form of evaluation. honestly i don't even know what it is you're even tryin to get at. are you criticizing this behavior? merely observing and describing its existence in a neutral manner? repelled …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter