sednandes Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. I mean that's what you basically said: Oh no, they were behind the times DECADES ago, and solved it DECADES ago.	/r/MensRights	01/08/26 01:58 AM
0	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. White surpremacy and racism was a solution?	/r/MensRights	01/08/26 12:02 AM
0	The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It Is I can't tell you how the Office for the Protection of the Constitution operates or which communities are monitored and how.	/r/MensRights	27/07/26 11:23 AM
-5	The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It Is Because it has led to a dozen terrorist attacks, the most recent of which took place just a few weeks ago in Canada.	/r/MensRights	27/07/26 11:16 AM
-9	The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It Is It's not only not pro-men, it's extremely dangerous, even for society as a whole. Men are becoming increasingly radicalized by it. That's why in Europe it is being monitored by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution.	/r/MensRights	27/07/26 02:08 AM
-1	Is R*pe a spectrum ? How does it only apply to men?	/r/MensRights	27/07/26 01:50 AM
3	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. if she chooses it to be girls, why do you have an issue? Because OP clearly hates women. you should worry why Andrew Tate isn’t funding a school for the boys than complaining about Oprah. And isn't the richest man in the world from South Africa? Doesn't seem to be worth complaining somehow.	/r/MensRights	26/07/26 11:08 PM
2	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. Why would you want boys to be sent to a luxury playground with no real education, a diploma with no value and a place of abuse? Are you a misandrist?	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 08:52 PM
3	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. You are right. Gilman School was founded by a rich woman, not by a rich man.	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 08:06 PM
-2	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. Gilman School, Landon School, Kingham Hill School, Hershey Industrial School; founded for boys by rich men and funded by rich men.	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 06:59 PM
2	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. Yes but these all boys luxurious schools didn't cost 40 million dollars and are not free and were not founded by rich male celebrity for boys. They did, but it wasn't funded by a single private individual. girls accepted into Oprah’s school are exempt from any tuition or education expenses. How is there tuition or education expenses since it isn't about education?	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 06:42 PM
10	In 2007, Oprah Winfrey opened a $40 million extravagant school just for girls in South Africa. Imagine the public reaction if the same thing were done exclusively for boys by a rich man. The school is not for all girls, it is specifically for academically gifted girls from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 06:40 PM
-2	I hate how many people push the idea that online misogyny is somehow more of an issue than online misandry There have been several attacks and terrorist acts motivated by misogyny in recent decades. Just a few weeks ago, there were two more attacks, one in Canada and one in Germany. Can you name a single assassination or terrorist attack motivated by misandry?	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 06:23 PM
1	Is hating feminine men misogyny? Isn't it a bit ironic to say that under a post that's entirely about them rather than the actual question?	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 05:59 PM
1	Is hating feminine men misogyny? They say that being feminine is seen as something weak in society for men. While ignoring that women who are feminine are more likely to be protected and taken care of than feminine men. "It is misogyny because it sees women as weak and not as capable as men" Do you see the connection?	/r/MensRights	25/07/26 05:52 PM
0	Shitting on men during mental health month You asked the question "how we got to a culture where men react that way". I answered why I think that is and now you’re reacting the exact way I was describing. Maybe you can answer your own question now. I didn't realize these two concepts were mutually exclusive and that talking about one meant we couldn't talk about the other. They’re not, but the whole point is that nobody is talking about the other one. People are talking about a comment made by a woman on the internet while literally prov…	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/06/26 03:53 PM
1	Shitting on men during mental health month I think this is where I still disagree. Your explanation assumes that the dismissive attitude comes primarily from barriers such as cost, access, waitlists, or negative experiences with therapy. But the comments here don’t really point in that direction. The original screenshot received over 157,000 likes, and the central message wasn’t: “Men’s mental health matters.” “Men need better access to care.” “Men are struggling and need support.” It was: “Men invest in what gives them peace.” “Maybe pl…	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/06/26 02:21 PM
1	Shitting on men during mental health month No, I think you’ve misunderstood me. The irony isn’t the original comment itself. The irony is that people here are criticizing the comment while simultaneously confirming its point. I don’t read the original statement as a deliberate disparagement of men that accidentally revealed a grain of truth; rather, the comment deliberately reflects the whole truth. A lot of men don't engage with therapy, but we have to look at the massive logistical hurdles before we just blame stubbornness. Now take a …	/r/EverydayMisandry	23/06/26 11:15 AM
2	Shitting on men during mental health month Thanks for the context. It’s almost ironic that the original statement that’s causing such outrage here is actually being proven right by the very people who are outraged by it.	/r/EverydayMisandry	21/06/26 11:53 PM