TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

segorisk Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by segorisk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I remember watching a documentary on a woman in a wheelchair wasting police time in similar ways and it was kinda sad.. She was housebound for decades and extremely lonely and seemed to do these things just to spice up her life.. I ain't excusing a false rape claim, as this impact on the falsely accused is huge. but there's probably more going on to this story than "disabled woman gets away with false rape claim again"
/r/MensRights27/09/18 10:56 AM
1

Can confirm this happens to straight guys too lol. Usually only older women are balsy enough to ass grab or place a hand on your chest/abs. It's all good when you like the person or they are a milf! Haha but I've also had a young girl I did NOT like And she would grab my arms and stroke me as I walk by etc at work.. Even taking selfies on the bus to work with me in the background in the seats behind.. where I had the say out loud to "stop taking pictures of me" (very seriously) Only for her to g…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:44 PM
13

Lmao, you got outed so hard. Women haters get mocked on this sub, they might get upvoted, sometimes.. But that's where the early birds get in the upvotes/downvotes and your typical Reddit vote psychology is in play, but commentors don't let this stuff slide. XD You don't need to be male to support men's rights, just like you don't need to be a woman to support women's rights and equality.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:51 PM
0

Is that an assumption? Or can you give me an example? I'm subbed to both Subreddits and use them both often. But only comment. They each have some serious haters of the opposite sex, but it seems to be pretty open about what is discussed. I tread on toes often too and you're the first to mention the possibility of getting banned.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 12:54 PM
3

/ns next time!
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:32 AM
2

I wrote a whole thing about this on r/feminism Comparing it to tinder dating. both sexes have the exact same opportunity as the next, it's not about fertility or money in most cases and both genders offer the same thing to the other.. a night out and some sex. and app is exactly the same despite your gender, same number of words, same amount of pictures. Opportunity is directly equal. Between genders. It's literally impossible to discriminate when both genders are using the same app. But given e…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:31 AM
6

Maybe no one considered your comment not to be sarcastic lol
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:01 AM
1

It didn't get to that point. She was caught out before 3 suspects could be named. As I said before, this is not the minority report, we can't see into the future. You can't just assume that girl would have given names.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:39 PM
3

Negative bias lol I agree with everything in this comment, I think people here have a hard time with separating themselves from an initial opinion they have, but you have to look at this case from all it's angles. The girl was scared to to approach her mother after cutting herself. Stupid enough to think that she would get away with this, didn't actually suspect any real people and admitted her lie as soon as she was caught... And more importantly blonde. But jokes aside, she's a young idiot who…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:40 AM
1

He said that not everyone shares the mind of the person next to them, knowledge isn't passed down by genes and the girl obviously didn't know her odds of fooling the law. Too stupid, ignorant and it seems clouded by fear of her mother's reaction to cutting herself. Whether that's the truth is unclear, but the girl has problems and I don't see 32 years being justified without extra penalties. He also said that rehabilitation was more important for this case than ruining a ditzy young girls life f…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:27 AM
5

I think we all struggle to think like this at times but you are bang on about the majority vote, as the majority vote sways with the season. there was a time when the majority of people believed the earth was flat, there was a time when the majority believed smoking was good for your health. Just to name a couple lol! ..and I thank you from the bottom of my heart for pointing me in the direction of the ripple effect as it is the foundation of my core beliefs. Something you can see in everything …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:47 PM
3

I put a comment elsewhere on this thread that got downvoted to hell and back, about how I don't think that you should have a "class room example" no single child should face an extreme punishment as a example to the rest of the class, because of how severely it effects the individual. It's like the saying "for the greater good" killing Germans would have stopped Hitler, but it's not right. Convictions should be dealt with on a case by case basis and a individual's trial is no place for political…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:36 PM
5

I'm well aware of the butterfly / ripple effect and I 100% am on board with what you are saying. 32 years still seems steep, if the media publicised this false accusation as publicly as the rape accusation itself, on paper that should rebut the bad press. But ofc paper theory isn't 1:1, but you can also argue the effects of harm done cannot be calculated, so with that you end up with a stalemate.. especially considering she's named and shamed with a picture of her face. 32 years.. hmm I feel as …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:21 PM
7

The presumption was that she would go ahead and falsely accuse 3 actual REAL people and follow it through. She hoaxed the story itself, that much is obvious.. This is the more like her illegally having possession of a firearm and shooting herself in the foot as apposed to shooting 3 innocent people. 2 very different cases.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:48 AM
-6

Yes, exactly! So for the law to go and presume that she would have accused 3 innocent black men would be the same as accusing them of rape itself. Do you not see the hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:29 AM
1

"edit:with that logic" Obviously her individual case isn't excused.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:23 AM
-3

By that logic we should punish white people for what our ancestors did to black people in history. White slaves anyone? /s
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:22 AM
-17

Seems a little unfortunate for the kid who is the example for the classroom. Obviously this girl has serious problems and is undoubtedly a cunt with little empathy. But no one should feel the brunt of societal problems. To punish her more than the person following her would be even more unfair. She was the first to make the mistake, you know? (Edit:With that logic)
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:17 AM
-10

With you bro, downvote me guys.. I know you want to. Haha Sentence her sure, but can you give someone 32 years for this when no one but herself was harmed? Even 32 years for a racist fueled lie/plot even seems a little steep. I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt and just because she seemed like she would have accused 3 innocent men had she not been caught doesn't hold strong enough for such a long sentence in my eyes. The presumption of innocence exists for a reason. To convict her b…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 09:13 AM
1

Reality is we have a dog owner problem, well trained dogs don't bite, regardless of their breed. Edit: also your quotation in that comment is your own interpretation of what I said, your not quoting what I actually said at all.. LOL
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:07 AM
1

You know I don't get alerted when you edit a post and make it 3x the size that it used to be lol I already told you it's called selective breeding, much like "natural selection" except manually selected by humans. Wrap your head around this, I have 3 degu's as pets. Which is a rodent animal domesticated in the last 50 years that lives for an average lifespan of around 5-8 years. So in less 10 generations a wild prey animal has been domesticated to the point it's sold in pet shops around the worl…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:49 AM
1

It's a simple analogy Statistics vs Causation
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:51 AM
1

Where exactly is the irony? You are an idiot. You can't take an analogy and apply it to your own reason and see the stupidity. Go copy paste more shit from Google, your comments are looking a little lack luster lately.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:20 AM
1

What we are talking about can be easily compared to the gender wage gap. Let's take the recent BBC gender wage gap "disparity" Women are paid 7% less than men. There's no way that figure could be attributed to any other factors /s Science!!! Idiot.. hahaha
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:56 AM
1

Yeah it's called selective breeding btw. But you're still talking about an animal bred alongside humans for generations. What I'm trying to say is it's not a wolfdog and even a 100% genetic wolf could be tamed by someone with experience.. so that instantly debunks what you're trying to say. Don't throw bite statistics at me like a moron, I called it out before you even replied and there's a very real movement in demonizing the breed. Such sites like dogbites.org focus soley on attack statistics …
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:49 AM
1

It's mainly staffs and Pitbulls over here in the UK. Staffs being the gang banger idiots dog of choice and Pitbulls are illegal in the UK. So it's no surprise that both breeds are considered dangerous. I actually have staffs myself and they are beautiful natured dogs, but I live in a rough area and many people have them as garden dogs in my area.. kids wind them up on the way to school over the garden fence till one day it digs a big enough hole to get out and Bite one of them. Also you have to …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 05:14 PM
4

Eek... Your gonna set off some people with that nonsense. So misinformed. Lol When a dog is breed has a bad stigma around it. It's obvious that the type of people who seek that dog for its status are very likely to be gang bangers or just plain scumbags who don't look after their dog properly, which is how the bite statistics around pitbulls is so bad. It was rottweilers, doberman, alsatian, Staffordshire bull terriers, Pitbull. What will it be next? Introduce better dog owner/breeding laws and …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:56 PM
4

Podcast
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:03 AM
25

And I hope they are the most unconvincing transition ever
/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:24 PM
1

They don't strive for equality anymore, because they overshot the goal and anyone who benefits from pushing the feminist narrative will keep going and going. (Even if they have to drive it into the ground) Every news show I watch in the UK is gender related right now, today's was the fact prostate cancer has now overtaken breast cancer deaths for the first time. To which they mentioned each gender at every opportunity, highlighting the fact it's never happened before.. Yesterday's was the gender…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:18 PM
5

nice...
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:12 AM
4

Honestly, I just got carried away trying to spark a conversation. Isn't difference between feminism and MRA's simply that one believes in the patriarchy and one doesn't? (Since they both set out to do the same thing, bring equality between genders) And that the MRA's were just late to the scene because feminism was more important back when it was created and the MRA didn't exist untill feminist organizations had already established themselves, by which time it was too late. I'm with you though, …
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:12 AM
2

In the UK it's mandatory that any one who owns a television capable of receiving a TV signal has to declare the usage of their TV every year for the rest of their life or pay a £147 p/y for a TV license. The presenters salary is what they must pay to compete with other news networks.. on the air. If all your hosts are being outshone by another networks cause your not paying yours enough your going to be out competed and no one will watch your news programme. I'm sure if the BBC could, they would…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:28 PM
1

Dunno why so many people are hitting you with the downvotes. Not been at work today and it's been on the news multiple times throughout the day, with certain people (excuse me I don't know the names) saying they will agree to have their pay reduced. At least 2 or 3 faces showed. However it was just them opting to have their pay reduced, I'm not sure if they actually did!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:13 PM
7

I think feminism had good intentions and was hijacked because of the lack of MRA during the early stages of the movement. If you YouTube search Feminism more than half of the results end up being feminist owned and logic videos, so it's probably a matter of time before the younger generation grows up and puts the last nail in the coffin.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:40 PM
2

And feminism views MRA's as a hate group.. lol! To just group all feminists as the same creature is a bit silly, just like to group all MRA's as the same creature is also just as silly.. I've seen a lot of guys who just drive home the feminist's point by having a lot of resent towards women. But those angry resentful men don't represent what we stand for, just like the blue haired angry face of feminism doesn't represent what feminism originally set out to do. look at Cassie Jaye, clearly a brig…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:37 PM
1

We are talking about black issues! #BLACKLIVESMATTER
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:38 PM
3

Are you suggesting we gloss over the issue and move on? Lol
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:35 PM
1

Yeah, wouldn't surprise me either if they rounded it up, I've seen homeless women.. but 1:4 seems a little high. (Luton, UK)
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:31 PM
3

And her name is an anagram of Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton combined.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:57 AM
10

Ki-Low so...where do we start with you? subscribe to this sub and watch how it operates towards women haters, they get downvoted to hell and back and ridiculed for their idiocy if they try and spout nonsense. This post simply points out how uncommon it would be to see the roles reversed and what a big scene the world would make of it. The privilege is the fact no one in the world cares for this man enough to reach out to him while these 2 women are smiling eating food above him. Roles reversed a…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:01 AM
2

With you on this one, maybe 32 years is a little steep. But that's a malicious person who would have put that innocent man to 32 years and destroyed his life with no guilt, given no repercussion. Sure, she's young and stupid. but also shouldn't be able to dodge the brunt of her sentence.. Those actions are very conscious evil decisions.. ..at the very least there needs to be some kind of rehabilitation on release too, she's a complete psychopath in every sense of the word.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:17 PM
1

I see a woman in the UK do exactly that aswell.. she asked me for some change.. i just spent all I had on a burger and was eating it in my car and Iwatched a Polish man hand her a 10 pound note a minute later, her saying "god bless god bless.." (fair play man, top bloke.. but you got scammed).. few minutes later she entered a car on the opposite side of the road with a man in it and they both drove off.. I wanted to tell him, but I wouldn't want to break that man's good will. :(
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:01 PM
1

Yeah, sorry but that thought process is barbaric. Just because the Nazi regime started in Germany.. doesn't mean they are bad people and deserve a cruel demise.. There was an old experiment where it was proven a sound minded person can believe and even commit in a terrible act given the right circumstances.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:33 PM
1

Waited for her to drink it unknowingly. This WKD has quite a kick. Nothing to look into here..
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:10 PM
1

from TRP movie, I'm gonna butcher it im sure. think your confusing feminism which is an ideology, with women which is a demographic.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 02:43 PM
15

When it comes to killing babies. Her body, her choice. forget it's a human being. When it comes to cutting at their penis's. His body, her choice. Again... Forget it's a human being.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 12:32 PM
1

Yeah it woke up the men of the internet to how toxic feminism is, as well as the women who claim they are not associated with feminism anymore.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 02:14 AM
1

But it kinda is, I gave clear concise instructions to find the answer to your question. This point was also already discussed on this thread to which someone replied that; "if that was the case any criminal could justify their own crime by saying that they must be insane or unable to recognise the extent of their crime to commit it in the first place" Laws can be changed/altered sure, but until they are, insanity has a objective meaning.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:03 PM
2

My natural response is to re-correct your path by sharing some wisdom that reflects on my own experience, so that you can re-evaluate your ways on your own accord. We wouldn't want to damage you ego now.. would we? But in your case everything that I would say would become fuel for an angry fire that well out of the control of a random Redditor who is non-combustible. Better to let you burn yourself out and hope you don't DESTROY too much of this beautiful forest on your way! Cheer up....old man?…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 02:45 PM
2

That's a very precise number and an insult directed at someone's age..? Very wise. Haha
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 01:37 PM
2

Don't apologize , I'm on your side. . . . (hahaha) and I rant too, hold my beer! it's easy for me to talk like a wise old man giving advice to youngsters. Lol You clearly understand it yourself, the rage of being down voted for absolutely NO reason brought it out of you. it is annoying, but unfortunately inevitable and a fault of human beings in general, not just Redditors. we like to pick a side and anyone who isn't on our side must be our enemy. Exactly as you put it. US presidency is a great …
/r/MensRights12/09/17 10:35 AM
1

It's a natural knee jerk response.. just like cypher was mad he was awakened within the 1st matrix movie. (The guy that ratted them out for a comfortable life within the matrix) And just like most people were not capable of leaving the matrix, they were selectively chosen because they wanted to leave and noticed the patterns by themselves. they had to be ready to leave the matrix, take Michael Kimmel for example, he was smart enough to understand the questions he was being asked during TRP movie…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 07:20 AM
1

After reading the thread again.. you are clearly trying to worm your way out.. the entire context is right here. The point is the law on insanity isn't subjective. And your taking a defensive position on everything, even my comment which I tried to stay as unbias as possible, to not interfere with your arguement. I do not need to be involved directly to comment. You have a serious ego problem.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:22 AM
1

I hate the mobile app.. lol, I was supposed to reply to the comment you wrote before someone linked you to Google within this thread. Which I now can't view because of the way the apps works and lack of search function My Apologies.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:11 AM
1

Holy crap you got absolutely destroyed by the first response. Get your head out your phone you social retard. Ahahahha If you had the ability to think outside of the moment you would realize you barely make any distance hugging the bumper of the car ahead, stressing yourself out raging at the guy ahead of you is what will kill you quicker When you crash and burn what happens then.. ? you have 2 lanes closed off and a 3 hour traffic. you have a arguement with the guy you're rushing at self servic…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 05:56 AM
1

I loved the first one, I literally watched the first matrix film followed by joining this sub within 1 hour.. So right now I'm ready to join tinder and dodge some bullets. Lol
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 05:38 AM
3

This is the point I raise one eyebrow while he's not looking and signal we should find another pub.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 05:23 AM
1

LOL, respects democracy, the U.S president and men's rights. "Must be a cunt." Some people..
/r/MensRights12/09/17 04:40 AM
0

Holy crap Joel, drop your ego mate. (I am NOT starting an arguement with you) it's genuine advice. Someone by the username of "liver_aloan" gave a pretty short answer somewhere on this thread that answers your question. (Ctrl+F then type his username to find it quickly if you're using a PC)
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:57 AM
1

This is my biggest quarm about Reddit. But I suppose it does force people to follow the rules, respect one another, because if someone has 120 downvote for example. They are pushed out of discussion for being, wrong or toxic and have their profile tarnished. it also adds a sort of pride in being a good Redditor. I know it's annoying that stupid people exist and that they are the majority, but you have to look at it as your own problem, your sensitivity. The best way to do that is be more clear a…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter