TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

selfhatingmisanderer Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by selfhatingmisanderer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sorry I don't really feel comfortable communicating with people who are cool with white pride groups. Ciao!
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:43 PM
1

So, things like this are exactly why we have the AMR subreddit!
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:19 PM
2

It sounds like you don't understand the importance of using non-anecdotal evidence to support your arguments. If you wanted to sound convincing, this is what your argument would sound like. "My hypothesis is that male feminist activists are significantly more likely <sup>1</sup> to be straight than gay. Here is a representative sample of X <sup>2</sup> number of male feminist activists, chosen in such a way to not introduce any sampling bias<sup>3</sup> . Here is how many are known to be heteros…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:58 PM
0

So do you think the "double standard" that black pride groups are cool but white pride groups are uncool is unfair?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:12 PM
1

Maybe because gay men are far outnumbered by straight men, or because you can't tell someone's orientation just by looking at them? Do you have any non-anecdotal data, such as a survey, to support the idea that gay men are significantly less likely to be feminist activists than straight men?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:08 PM
0

Again, you are projecting real hard. Not everyone's actions are motivated by a desire for sex.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:54 PM
1

Societal context definitely matter. That is, for example, why it is cool to have Black Pride Groups but why it is uncool to have White Pride Groups. If we did not use an understanding of how race works in society, we might conclude that this is an unfair double standard rather than an obvious truth(though I'm sure many in your subreddit would disagree!). In the same way, we should use our societal understanding of gender before concluding that something is an unfair double standard.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:50 PM
0

There's nothing wrong with calling out double standards. Our argument is that your groups' "reverse gender" arguments generally either involve hypotheticals that are misinformed or never happened, or that they are off the mark because they completely ignore the dynamics and context of how gender and gender roles currently work in society. They mostly just stoke false outrage and do nothing to enhance the rights of men.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:38 PM
2

It was sitting at the basically the same vote total when I first saw it. It's quite possible that the members of this sub just did not like the post and downvoted it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:55 PM
1

OP had questions about our sub, and I was trying to helpfully answer them. If you consider that brigading, then I'll gladly leave.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:43 PM
1

1) Sure, if you want to define half as a lot. 2) We are perfectly open to legitimate criticism. What we were experiencing was people coming in and posting porn, telling us to get raped, and people reporting every single post and every comment. Perhaps your movement thinks this qualifies as legitimate criticism, but we do not. 3) lol... PS: http://www.alternet.org/story/65468/study_finds_that_feminists_have_better_relationships,_sex_lives
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:00 PM
3

AMR mod here... 1) Our polls show we are about half women and half men 2) We didn't go private because we were receiving lots of criticism we can't accept. We went private because we were being heavily brigaded by trolls. 3) When you say things like that we're pushing feminism because we want to get laid, it sounds like you're projecting really hard.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:03 PM
-5

Yes I read that part too. I read "age of misandry" and laughed for a while. Anyway, I'd like to give you a friendly piece of advice: You continuing to defend and endorse this website, when they write things like this, is a big reason of why people think your movement is full of rape apologists and why you appear at #1 on lists like these. You may read that and think "Oh in the context it's just fine", but most people read that and are absolutely disgusted. If you are genuinely concerned about yo…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:14 PM
-6

I continued on with the context and I also read "Voting not guilty on any charge of rape is the only way to remain faithful to the concept of presumed innocence" "f you are sitting on a jury hearing a case of rape, the only way to serve justice is to acquit." I think I understand just fine.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 01:54 PM
-2

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/jury-duty-at-a-rape-trial-acquit/ "Should I be called to sit on a jury for a rape trial, I vow publicly to vote not guilty, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the charges are true."
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:22 AM
-5

Seems like you're inferring that based on very little information.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:24 AM
-8

In your view, how do you tell the difference between those two things?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:27 PM
-7

Do you believe that it is impossible to rape someone if you are drunk yourself?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:07 PM
-16

lol
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:00 PM
-11

Yes absolutely. Surveys have found that 84% of college men who have committed rape, according to the legal definition of rape, called what they did "definitely not rape" (Warshaw 1994). It is an obvious fact of campus life that many people view sex with a person too drunk to give informed consent as acceptable. Sorry if it sounds patronizing, but the data shows that more teaching about, and emphasis on, consent is necessary.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:25 PM
19

Well I certainly do think that the speaker of a quote, the context in which it's said, and the meaning the quote is intended to have by its speaker all ought to affect the meaning that we take away from it.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 03:56 PM
21

Even if you don't think it matters who said it, you should at least care about being accurate.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:50 PM
43

fyi although that quotation is commonly misattributed to Voltaire (find me a primary source if you want to prove otherwise), it actually comes from a Neo-nazi pedophile named Kevin Strom.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:28 PM
27

For a group that has such hatred for false accusations, ya'll sure make a fuck lot of them.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 12:25 PM
4

Ok I think you have me figured out so I'll just come clean. The hammer actually goes with the sickle. I'm funded by the Soviet Union.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:49 AM
10

No I told you it's the Obamacare dollars.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:55 PM
9

It's true. There's actually a provision in Obamacare that allocated the funds to start our group. See if you can find it!
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:58 PM
11

As someone from AMR, I can confirm this. Obama personally writes me a cheque every two weeks. We actually get paid bonuses for being downvoted, so upvoting us is the best way to take us down. Please don't tell anyone though, if this gets out it will be bigger than the IRS scandal.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:36 PM
0

Scumbag MRA: Complains about high rate of male suicides; encourages men to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:41 PM
1

I'm sorry about your internet points. :( I'm sure if you repost that Bill Burr video for the 100th time you can recoup your losses.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:54 PM
0

Show proof or don't bring it up. What kind of proof would you like that I find your arguments laughably pathetic? I guess I could record a youtube video of myself laughing. I find it amusing that both claims I was responding to how come every time i see a video with feminists involved it just ends up being a bunch of angry women shouting insults and making what seem to be unfounded claims and I've tried to find video's of Feminists acting appropriately and giving good arguments mention nothing a…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 08:03 PM
-6

Well I think everyone here and I will have a different idea of what a good argument even is. I read the stuff posted here every so often and I find your arguments laughably pathetic in general. So I don't want to get hung up on that point because there's no common ground. But I think we can agree on what it means to be "a bunch of angry women shouting insults" or "acting appropriately", so I am more concerned with addressing that particular point.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:29 PM
-4

Do you think they were acting inappropriately?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:27 PM
2

Ok here is a conversation on the Melissa Harris-Perry show about feminism in the 21st century. Please tell me how they are acting inappropriately. Then please watch this episode of Up with Chris Hayes and tell me where they are acting inappropriately. Watch this interview of Vandana Shiva by Amy Goodman, and tell me how they're acting inappropriately.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:37 PM
-2

not once did they say women are perpetrators of violent and sexual crimes. Assuming you are talking about the Jason Katz video, quoting from 11m30s, I know there's more than men and women, there's more than male and female and there are women who are perpetrators and there are of course men who are victims...
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:33 PM
-3

Well ultimately it is your own responsibility to do your own research on a topic.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:13 PM
46

That is called selection bias. You only watch videos with feminists involved that are posted on reddit, reddit hates feminism and wants to make it look like a bunch of angry women shouting insults, and so that is what you see.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:16 PM
15

Pretends to be MRA Makes up crazy conspiracy about false flag feminist smears Makes MRAs look crazy, MRAs discredited
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter