TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sellingXY Archive

View 3 posts and 128 comments by sellingXY on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

youre up against American culture, having a stay at home wife has been eradicated from commonplace culture for decades now, no wonder he's objective to it
/r/RedPillWomen01/08/23 05:27 AM
–

Now, the more educated women with higher income are the ones with the highest fertility rate. this is simply false, simply.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 09:49 PM
1

complete delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 04:29 PM
1

how so, the more education money ect woman have less kids they have, its a known fact
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 11:57 AM
0

3rd world over populated countiers would love to donate some population to ease the burden, and 1st world would love to take that donation to negate demographic collapse, your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 11:47 AM
1

You can't think in the short term to fix long term problems. welcome to modren economics and human policy making since the dawn of time
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 11:45 AM
-5

MEH, seemed to have worked out 50 years aago just fine
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 09:47 AM
-1

doesnt matter the fact still holds that woman hold more debt and less savings, facts are facts
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 09:47 AM
1

well as hypothetical as it is, feel free to look at big data from large dating app companies to see the SMV differentials. everyone knows that an early 20s female dating pool is VASTLY larger (largest infact) then early 20s male group, it dwarfs it infact, if you don't believe this then there's no point arguing further just because you're not single doesn't mean you're in a serious relationship..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:21 AM
2

22 yr old female can date 22 - 60+ yr old men 22 yr old male can date almost noone the spreads are vastly different cuz of the dating market differentials
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:01 AM
0

human culture is not driven by natural selection, you are very ignorant
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 06:12 AM
0

forcing meaning polarizing, and what youre saying is simply not relevant, the more freedom lead to collapsing fertility rates, i have no idea what you mean by sorting themselves out? a fertility rate of less then 2.1 means the society is literally dying out, so what are you even talking about? genes dont matter when woman on aggregate choose to have less kids, due to whatever circumstance is at play
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 05:54 AM
1

yeah i believe it beacuse its specifically for younger cohort, younger woman have way more options and are there for more saturated with relationships of all ages, younger men have minimal options so this statistic makes sense ​ and no if this statistics was for ALL ages then it wouldn't make any sense, obviuosly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 05:51 AM
2

what youre saying still doesnt matter if the culture forces a shift in child rearing age, the probability of maximizing fertility is still minimized no matter how good the genes
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 05:26 AM
2

the diffrence is that you can pump immigrants into the USA cuz economic oppretunity, but not into china, u best believe theyre gonna come in floods soon
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 05:20 AM
1

shopping is the utmost pleasure a woman will achieve in her life, dont talk shit
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:50 AM
0

the earth went thru so many mass extinctions, learn some history
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:49 AM
2

sure. global populations wont ever drop below what they were 200 years ago, but the economic pain will be PAINFULL believe me either way, good genes or not, child rearing age moved from early 20s to mid 30s, and its not stopping..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:48 AM
2

its an extremely rare sight, even rarer if the man is the only ugly one
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:24 AM
1

woman invented ways to make men more productive by restricting thier puss, in terms of technological inventions, woman maybe contributed 0.5% to all inventions
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:06 AM
1

male inventors make up the significant proportion of all male or female inventors throughout time, there is no disputing this
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:04 AM
2

but what will we do without all the hair and nail salons? civilization would collapse
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:03 AM
1

civ will collapse
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:02 AM
1

incredibly far fetched and unbased in anything, can you provide links to support your claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:01 AM
1

man, pussy is like, the coolest shit ever
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 04:00 AM
0

the few men lead and invent, the rest take orders with the promise of pussy, thats where woman come in
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:55 AM
1

nah, its not, infact it didnt notice humans before, and wont notice after theyre gone
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:55 AM
5

it is dying, demographics collapse imminent (unless they pump more immigrants which wont really work long term anyway)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:37 AM
1

consumerism doesnt not impact fertility rates, but woman becoming the new consumer base is a last ditch ploy to preserve a decaying consumerist society, low fertility rates come about when more and more men can no longer afford relationships/families , which is a symptom of decaying consumerist society
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:36 AM
2

yes, its a short term solution and the imploding population demographics will have strong effects soon, again this is nothing but a short term patch on a society/economny inevitably doomed "No vagina means the world stops spinning. World stops spinning means, the end." i really hope thoes nerds pull thru with the cloning technology, i pray..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:34 AM
2

watching thos docs about tribes in the amazon sets it straight , everyone is working, however.. woman didn't invent shit throughout history (compared to men, speaking proportionally) and if inventions is what propels civ forward then indeed (few) men 'built' it all
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:31 AM
0

Men can be promiscuous, women can't cause they don't earn it, it's simple Men cant be promiscuous, women can cause they don't earn it, it's simple ​ FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:19 AM
1

"I was the happiest I ever was. I actually swore I would never enter a completely serious & monogamous relationship again." why then? you want kids? that's reasonable ofc.. regarding the second, youre saying there's no leverage gained from out earning? in that case, why was it bliss then but now that hes earning more its not bliss anymore? is it just cuz the honeymoon phase is over?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:16 AM
2

I don't want to date anyone I wouldn't want to be friends with I don't fuck my friends. you just contradicted yourself in one paragraph, typical
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:11 AM
3

its like they go back to bieng with daddy who provides shelter, but this daddy they can fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:59 AM
1

"I was perfectly happy while single " really? are you honest? not doubting just curious cuz literally every one says that but nobody actually believes it him being at a lower income level should mean you would have more leverage over him, or more sense of security that he wont cheat/leave, do you agree with this? does the absence of this insurance take away from the bliss? thank you for answering
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:57 AM
2

no no, the 63% stats single means actually single, not even part time gf, why are you arguing with stats?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:52 AM
2

yes, but men are doing that less and less and less, so all purchasing power to woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:46 AM
1

they will spend on thier own interest before they spend it on children, fertility rate confirms this, and its great for consumerism, praise!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:46 AM
2

cant wait for cloning tech, i cant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:39 AM
1

not but number of lifetime partners helps estimate it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:38 AM
0

30% of younger woman are single, vs 60% of guys, would u like a link?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:37 AM
1

doesnt count if youre on a street full of hookers lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:33 AM
7

woman are MORE hivemind then men, there is no disputing this, especially considering stuff like agreeability differences ect..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:32 AM
1

can a world built by men be ruled by men? or does the world have to be built by men and ruled by woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:18 AM
0

ofc, its someone financially on your level or more, does it concern you that youre competing over 0.5% of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:12 AM
1

nah, mere absence will suffice (null is worse then volatility) , spicy protest don't represent the real (quiet) 25%
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 04:32 AM
1

avoid the trap thats clear given the data, save time. time is the king of commodities
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 05:03 AM
5

by abstaining. literally by 25% choosing to not play the economy will implode
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 04:58 AM
0

lemme guess? orphans are probably also on par with single/due parent households! everybody is always equal yay!!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 02:42 PM
0

okay, but i have read other papers that actually do show my claim, besides you can always look at indirect variables , schooling, lifetime earnings, lifetime probability of drug usage ect, id you really believe that single households make no difference on child development as opposed to the latter you are truly lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 06:54 AM
1

statistically most criminals come from single mother households, are you sure youre still sarcastic?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 10:24 PM
1

Polygamous relationships aren't really needed.The modern norm is serial monogamy. So, chads can have kids with one woman and then move onto the next woman. i see the misunderstand, its its my enlighs, the word i was lookin to use above was polygyny not polygamy. polygyny is the new norm, sorry for the confusion, all the points followed i completely agree with So, the disadvantage hits non-monogamous women but not non-monogamous men (chad's). ultimately the beta bux will also be dying (genetic ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 10:16 PM
1

whatever it maybe its a smaller burden then a life od assumptions delusion and fantasy, you have been invited to change your own perspective and its up to you to choose if you are to put in the effort , or stay in your happy little bubble
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 06:47 AM
2

thoes are some great points but its important to remember that polygamous relationships (chad +2+ woman) are still rare and ultimately beta bux is settled for after the carousel , inevitably, which is why beta bux will not be selected against the gene pool , on aggregate/ "So monogamous women will always maintain an advantage over non-monogamous women." not sure how true this is because no matter what about half of all households are raised by single mothers, chad or no chad, monogamous or not. …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 06:45 AM
1

youre welcome to research it yourself, im not doing it for you nor do i believe you would care for it even after reading it, however its out there and very easy to find, happy googling!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:14 AM
1

Men engage in mate-guarding too. thanks for proving my point, why are we debating this? You think women select for comitment oriented men? Well, statistics show that ~43% kids are born out of wedlock. So, we as a species are selecting for non-monogamous men. you mean non-monogamous woman? men can still be monogamous and raise another's child, theyre just simps in that case "All monogamous species practice heavy mate-guarding. Male birds throw out eggs of rival male birds from the nest." children…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:13 AM
1

Standards are not biologically programmed in DNA. they are , look at some animals that will kill foreign kin (not thier own) , and conversely, some spcies are perfectly open to carry and feed non genetic kin you should actually read something for once
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:53 PM
1

published statistics..
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 08:51 PM
1

thank you for the descriptive response, youre not wrong about the illogicality of it all, afterall, fertiity rates (spawned by this sexual marketplace) are below replacement, so a marketplace striving for its own extinction, a failure, so if anything change will either come from within or after its collapse unfortunately, for me atleast, ive always thought that humans behave and do and seek whatever lets them reconnect with what is left of thier inner child, for me atleast, chasing an entity whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 03:15 AM
1

im just proving a potential view on my initial statement, nothing more, trying to avoid the personal, which is what youre describing above, i agree its sad but its not about you, or me, it just is, atleast thats how i rather argue for arbitrary view points but since you bring it up, i always found gay males to be the friendliest kindest people there are, but my pride will not let me compromise my sexual orientation and fetishes to get some intimacy, not that im implying anything about anyone, su…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:51 AM
0

your standards will die with you, but i can still commend you for it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:26 AM
1

uh ok, if you wanna deploy sepcial mechanisms like that then youre still in, but generally speaking from what i understand the sexual market place revolves around sexual selection which has a strict genetic drive as a component, all deeply subconscious ofc, this all comes with the infamous market dynamics prepetually discussed here, if youre gay youre technically not in the game, at all, but surrogate removes the sexual selection component totally so in a way its a work around for what the 'stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:25 AM
1

youre not a market participant, neither are your genes, go have your fun
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:40 AM
4

king
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:33 AM
-3

2022 already youre gonna die alone bud
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:17 AM
3

its about probability, slept around more then 10 unique times? your probability of staying in a committed relationship is near 0, there are stats on this anything over 5 ish lifetime partners and your probability of cheating/divorce is already near 80%
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 01:14 AM
1

Politics matter because education for women = carousel and low fertility. All you have to do is end college and fertility will come back. If you end high school for women, fertility will come back even more. incorrect, its because educated woman account for most consumption, the more they make the more they consume, strangely men who make as much or more consume less (statistically) , i guess the low fertility is an unfortunate byproduct of this ill do the math hold on
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:18 PM
1

based
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:31 PM
1

why are you even mentioning politcs? im talking about fertility rate, its not enough to make a diffrence in the rate thats all im saying
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 11:31 PM
4

its over bro
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:28 PM
1

what do you want? to secure a wife? if you just want sex you pay for it like humanity has since the dawn of time
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:26 PM
2

gonna have to do the pick me dance in both cases, cuz chad (top 2% ) has his phone blown up at all times
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:11 PM
1

10% of women birth 20% of the next generation. this isnt false, but its just not enough anymore...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:10 PM
0

spawn per vagina, its not conducive to your point because if what you claim is natural order of some sort, then it would have been so and worked to sustain a population, but given that its no longer the case, the order you claim is probably not currently in dominance , is my point ..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:06 PM
1

top kek, atleast were alive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:02 PM
1

not true , decreasing feminists doesnt imply increasing trads , other wise we would observe this trend which doesnt exist (yet)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:25 PM
1

this is about demographics and promiscuity, not sluts
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:21 PM
1

actually by definition the aggregate tells the whole story, or else it wouldn't be aggregate , Lower fertility = fewer everything
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:18 PM
1

implying this is a high quality sub
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:16 PM
1

well if u wait to long ur either popping out one from a poor choice or dying childless
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:14 PM
1

i see youre not looking to breed yourself, dw soon your heritage will go extinct indefinitely!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:06 PM
1

happy to hear that, still doesn't change the aggregate
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:04 PM
1

you shouldnt provide stats from 1975, incase you havnt noticed the fertility rates were still decent back then ( moving avg not actual, as just 5 years ago it was 2.5), its a whole other picture now (42 years later btw) , which is why i appreciate your research but its dated af
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 01:01 PM
1

correct but implied nonetheless , youre gonna tell me single mothers arent promisciuos , then why are they single!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:59 PM
1

but again they contribute to nothing 40% actually, or probably so, link provided in OP "they arent going around popping up unplanned kids here and there" they are lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:53 PM
1

its what you would consider stable, planned ect, the oppesite of random CC spawners
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:51 PM
1

link provided, only 60% comes from 'planned', 'stable'
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:50 PM
1

not sure if youre memeing but either way its over, slut shaming will accelerate the replacement decline
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:49 PM
1

immigrants WILL replace you , they are harder workers and will work for less, and if they immigrated chances are they are also educated this isnt about them or about 'quality' lol, and even if it was, its going to matter less and less cuz nuclear households are not keeping up, so i guess you are opting for immigration takeover, well more so a problem for your kin also the myth that married households produce better spawn used to hold valid, but again, they wont breed either, so its not like the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:43 PM
1

yes about the same as non CC, which is basically JUST AS IMPORTANT theyre keeping up half the population
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:35 PM
1

Flawed argument first because nobody hates on promiscuous people because they are promiscuous like at least half this sub, and probably every religious out there lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:30 PM
1

no, it does matter, infact its becoming more relevant by the decade. that's kinda my point, suppressing it will only hurt your society (in the long demographic future) so encouraging/embracing it may very well become the last stand, esp if the current trend of nuclear household breeding continues to plummet, as its doing so
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:29 PM
1

data is data, not evil nor good, but morality is important
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:23 PM
2

i agree with you but at this point promisciuos people (probably) contribute to half of the fertility rate either way, and may very well lead the way into the future (based on 45% households being single status , implying promiscuity ect)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:22 PM
2

almost half the USA breeders are single households, what youre saying is not backed up by data at all
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:19 PM
0

maybe it was once so, but no longer is, infact its completely arbitrary at this point if you have a nuclear family or not when it comes fertility rates
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:18 PM
4

bruh u just got served by a boomer, are you gonna take that as a zoomer?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:14 PM
4

why compete with other men when you can just become a woman, if you wanted to, OP is not living in 2022
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 12:09 PM
2

cant turn anyone into a housewife lmao, regardless of fucks, wake up its 2022
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:56 AM
3

divorce lawyers dont mind..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:54 AM
1

would you say the repression is due to the motive or self value elevation? (or preservation of) , when everybody lies , its because they know it would hurt their image
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:51 AM
2

got it, ty for clarifying, but isnt it implied that more sexual choices means more sexual unique choice interactions?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:48 AM
1

does having ur man fuck others elevate your attraction?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:36 AM
5

Humans are not a polygamous species. valid for maybe the last 200 years? read some history
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:31 AM
4

the guy that can fuck anything that moves is chad, high quality female wants chad too, what point is it that youre making?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:18 AM
2

take your shitty thesis out the window now because plummeting fertility rates indicate that the dynamic is not at all trivial like this, but still a fun read
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 11:16 AM
1

serious question, do you secretly still yearn for an alpha despite a realistic perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 06:54 AM
2

y cant u jut accept that shes un datable literally as she said, always gotta hold onto the simp logic smh
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 06:42 AM
1

fair
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 05:30 AM
3

this is all mostly none sense, its because younger males make nothing financially compared to the other groups, the 3% total wealth statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/21 12:43 AM
1

remember that all woman built bridge that collapsed and killed 5 people? noone of those fake engineers ever went to jail even, youre delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 11:05 PM
0

more like 4-5 years until you become neglectful and abusive, then the state sorta just takes over the parental role, at least thats what happens most often
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:20 AM
-5

i see, nobody seems down to have kids in general as the data shows, how come its a prevalent topic that woman dont want to have a kid but adoption is strictly off the table?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:19 AM
0

so much for world bank data, u moron
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:01 AM
2

historical low fertility rates, soon our society will be nothing but old people with some kids, its gonna get really ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:00 AM
3

well see how meaningless they are when the demographic crisis destroys everything
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:02 AM
1

it do b that way
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 12:29 PM
1

thats complete bs and you know it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 05:43 PM
4

ur dying single
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 05:31 PM
2

LOL correct question
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 05:29 PM
1

a fool wasting his valuable time is a fool nonetheless
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 05:22 PM
6

not disputing main argument but >To me it sounds like there is no net benefit and that women's current selective behavior actually adds a lot of stability. actually there's a demographic crisis underway, future economic hardship is guaranteed to ensue because of this
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 04:56 PM
3

c o p e
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 06:21 AM
1

study probably conducted by chad
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 01:45 AM
0

ik i was being half sarcastic but half, the stats disagree with you soo...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 10:13 PM
0

basically, not physically attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:50 PM
1

fat or not actually hardly matters, woman dont marry down its that simple, and they've been going up as you said in ur comment
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/21 08:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter