TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

seppa_ilmarinen Archive

View 1 post and 223 comments by seppa_ilmarinen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
35

Blogs/Videoseppa_ilmarinen/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:12 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You're doing gods work, boy. Seriously though, there should be one of you in the comments of every video submitted.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:06 AM
1

God fucking dammit. I have a massive beard and every one of my friends has posted this article on my Facebook wall, and now I see it here too lol. Well at least they aren't calling me duck dynasty anymore.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:59 AM
6

Doesn't involve cutting? Every circumcision requires cutting. The dick fairy doesn't come and zap it away.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:56 AM
2

Is not removed? My butcher seems to take his time and scrape away every shred of it. Get the fuck off this subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:55 AM
1

Ain't that the truth?! Signed a couple like 2 years ago and nothing but email!
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:50 AM
1

In this whole shituation your mother is the shittiest of all. What kind of mother would hand her son over like that. It's like she was just sure you were guilty. My mother (as much as I can't stand her) would have fought that tooth and nail from the start.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:31 PM
2

If I were ever horribly burned and the doctors tried to use a skin graft that came from foreskin fibroblasts I would refuse.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:25 AM
6

My toenails grow back, chuckle-nuts. My toenails are just keratin. The foreskin contains the most sensitive parts of the penis and removal of it is mutilation regardless of how well performed it is. I've still lost the majority of genital function.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:17 AM
2

All circumcision is genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:55 AM
1

You know what, I didn't actually watch the video. I'm sorry for that. I don't get very good reception at home and don't usually watch the YouTube links, and the armpit hair issue in this sub always seems to be "ugh gross women growing armpit hair because feminism" which gets on my nerve because my ex didn't shave anything and not because the patriarchy. She was an intactivist and was more vocal about men's issues than anything.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:07 AM
1

What reason would I have to lie?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:18 PM
1

I picked her up the next day, 12-14 hours after words and she could barely walk or talk. She only had two drinks the night before. Even if she had been lying about the number of drinks there is no amount of alcohol that can do that to a person. If it were possible I'd certainly have had days like that. She also couldn't urinate which is a side effect. She would have no reason to lie about it.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:12 PM
1

It's satire you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:02 PM
1

Right. lil jon at the gym certainly has enough power to potentially knock me out, though I can lift his 135 pounds overhead. My size means nothing on the street if I get sucker punched. That's why I carry.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:22 PM
-5

How does this benefit the MRM? My guess is many women don't report being roofied. My sister didn't. They got out of the bar before anything beyond the roofy happened and she just wanted to forget the whole thing. I also called my friends who used to bounce at this place and they informed me there are no working cameras anyways, and the Canucks that did it would be back in Canada before anything could be done. Interesting that I'm being downvoted when there is evidence all over this thread statin…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:07 PM
1

Yeah pretty much. Not exactly what I like to hear alone in a hotel room.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:01 PM
1

Even if this were true (it isn't) this still isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:30 AM
3

I saw Behemoth play in Minneapolis in April. During "at the left hand ov god" (one of my favorites) some girl grabbed my arm. I ignored her until she stepped in front of me, pointed at me, then herself, and then towards the exit. I shook my head because it was fucking Behemoth playing 5 feet from me and she looked at me like I had slapped her. TL;DR: women are used to getting sex on demand, and Behemoth puts on a damn good show.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:06 AM
3

/u/Allistoro I know exactly what you mean. I knew something was up from the first time I had sex, which was 5 years before I knew what circumcision was. Women have full body orgasms that have them contorting like they are possessed and their eyes rolling into the back of their heads, and mine lasts a few seconds.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:58 AM
2

The medical community isn't concerned with anything other than profits. Doctors tend to know it's wrong and leave their sons whole in greater numbers, even the ones performing circumcisions.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:51 AM
1

I don't call myself an MRA because I don't like labels. My family knows my stance on circumcision and they all think I'm crazy. My mother made sure to call me while I was working 800 miles from home to tell me as much, and that I would die alone and miserable. So I don't care to talk about political stuff anymore.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:20 AM
9

Bigger and stronger doesn't mean shit. My highschool girlfriend was a second degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do and kicked me hard enough (sparring, not abuse) to pick me off the ground. I'm 6'3" and 290lbs now and have trained with men half my size who could knock me out. Size doesn't mean shit.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:11 AM
1

Good for you. If I ever have children I will be cosleeping. Co slept with my ex and her son when we were together and nothing beat waking up to a smiling toddler and then having a slap fight for five minutes while he was nursing (I was half asleep one morning and reached over to cup her boob, he was nursing and smacked my hand away so we fought for the next five minutes or so)
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:40 AM
1

Have you ever coslept? Its perfectly fine if you aren't a drunk or a dumbass and nothing beats waking up to a smiling baby or toddler. A few of my fondest memories involve co sleeping with my (now ex) and her 2 year old son. I don't know if there is any scientific basis for this reaction, but I sleep like a fucking rock, but almost instinctually when I co slept I woke up any time he stirred and would've never been at any risk of squishing him.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:37 AM
3

If taking a knife to the male sex organ without consent isn't a male issue then what the fuck is? MGM is THE male issue.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:00 AM
3

I don't know dood, something about how it's a violent act of sexual mutilation performed on infants who did not and can not consent to having their penises permanently damaged.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:59 AM
2

Thanks for sharing. The circ rate is so high in northern Minnesota that I had no idea I was even cut until I was 22. That was three years ago. I didn't do any pecker-checking in the locker rooms and I don't recall anyone being bullied. All anatomy books I've seen showed cut as normal.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:51 AM
0

People make jokes about the guy who got his face eaten off by the "bath salts" guy. I just don't really have enough sympathy for people who choose a cosmetic procedure when there are thousands of babies mutilated a day.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:52 AM
0

He has a point. No one feels bad for people that go in for other cosmetic surgeries and come out looking hideous. Women with botched facelifts are the constant butt of jokes.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 01:17 AM
0

It doesn't say that in the article.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 01:13 AM
2

Why do you feel that this belongs here? What women do with their body hair (which is as natural as ours) isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 01:01 AM
1

We shouldn't need any studies to make forced genital cutting illegal, unless of course you meant better studies for consenting adults to decide?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:33 AM
2

I would feel better about all these studies, even the multitude of outright lies if it were illegal to inflict on minors.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:26 AM
2

There is no evidence that circumcision reduces penile cancer in the first place. The rate of penile cancer in intact Europe is a third of the rate in largely circumcised America. Std's are much lower in Europe as well. The problem is arguments for circumcision are almost exclusively used to support mutilating babies, and very few adults opt to be cut if they were left the choice.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:06 AM
4

I don't really care if it somehow made women immortal, it's still wrong to force on a man.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:47 PM
2

Absolutely! Don't expect to be done in a year (unless you're cut tight and simply looking to get enough skin for comfort) it can take 4 years or more. I have one friend who's in college and has a job that doesn't require much movement who wears his DTR all day long and has made crazy progress in 18 months, but he still has 6 months to a year to go.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:21 PM
2

I have a long way to go. On a good day I have some skin that rolls over the corona. I'm a "grower" so luckily I don't have much surface area to cover when flaccid. Here you go, sir. http://www.foreskinrestore.com this is the first device I bought. I have one other my buddy makes but I don't know if he has a site yet.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:55 PM
2

Well looks like the other guy had a very detailed answer. I've been restoring for 8 months and not very consistently, I even took a whole month off when I was visiting Florida. On a good day I have a little skin roll over my corona and if I've been wearing the device steady for a couple days it becomes really sensitive. Sex has just been more comfortable with the skin I've gained so far. No chafing or dryness.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:51 PM
1

He made a choice and choices have consequences. This would be a men's rights issue if he went in for an unrelated surgery and woke up mutilated.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:11 PM
6

I'd definitely recommend it. I started in November and it's made a world of difference already.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:00 PM
1

Absolutely! In many cases throws and sweeps will do more damage, but they seem to be the "acceptable" form of self defense when used by authorities. I've been in and out of the martial arts for a decade and I'd rather be punched in the face any day than have all of my weight used against me. Typically strikes are seen more as acts of aggression.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:28 PM
1

This is the kinda bullshit that contributed to my decision to leave intactivism. I had an intactivist tell me I shouldn't own guns because I'm cut. We don't need this kind of idiotic hypothesizing in this sub.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:23 AM
1

Yeah, don't do this. I don't care if the cause is something I'm extremely passionate about. This is a good way to get the shit kicked out of you. I know I'm not the only guy with road rage out there. And in the states I'm not the only guy with road rage who is also armed.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:52 AM
7

In all seriousness, it would be kinda cool if kilts became accepted fashion again. Bet that breeze is nice on a hot day.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:37 AM
2

This is fantastic! I'm starting to notice more commercials like this, hopefully this becomes more common.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:24 AM
8

What has this world come to? He couldn't have possibly handled that more professionally under the circumstances. He used a leg sweep rather than striking her. No anger in his actions, and he didn't put any of his weight behind the movement. Yet they still want to crucify him.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:19 AM
1

Unless you are in Indiana and the cop is entering your house without a warrant. (Or most places if cops are violating your rights, in law you're in the clear, in practice...not so much)
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:04 AM
0

MGM removes 100% of the nerve endings in the foreskin (no shit). That is also not the case with FGM. The main body of the clitoris is internal and function of the genitals isn't as drastically altered. Women in countries that circumcise report being able to orgasm. They also defend it as much as American men defend their own mutilation. Based on your comments you don't know much.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:28 AM
1

I'm a big proponent of buying American and union made goods so there won't be a Hyundai in my future, but I wish there were more advertisements like this.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:06 PM
3

Actually it's powerfully accurate language. It isn't a minor "procedure" either. It an egregious mutilation. http://youtu.be/MDuDhkiDdns
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:51 PM
2

The doctor tore the foreskin from your glans, crushed it with the forceps before slicing it , then put it in the clamp and crushed it again before slicing it off. If you only had the end of your foreskin removed, well you're lucky.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:27 PM
1

You don't seem to understand how drastically MGM alters the penis.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:05 PM
3

Girls are mutilated at a fraction of the rate boys are worldwide, and FGM is almost non-existent in western countries so how the fuck do you define urgent?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:03 PM
3

"Nigga u don't know any better neither way. You sound like 'I was born without arms but I rollerskate just fine'. Shit shut up." /u/StopTalkingOK
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:34 PM
2

Actually it hasn't been ok at any point in those few thousand years.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:30 PM
4

Tearing, crushing, then amputating half the skin of the penis and all of the most erogenous parts isn't mutilation?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:29 PM
3

I love it when women with intact genitals try to dismiss MGM especially american women considering most of their male relatives have been mutilated. Also you're wrong. RIC is closer to removing the labia, clitoral hood, and the external glans clitoris. Circumcision removes half of the skin of the penis , 20,000 fine touch nerve endings (the clitoris has 8,000) and leaves the glans to dry and keratinize further reducing sensitivity. Don't come to this sub and talk out of your ass.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:27 PM
1

For me it's that someone could make a permanent life altering decision for me, on a whim. I got lucky, because The doctor didn't slip, but the thought that I could be a total sexual cripple at no fault of my own is pretty disturbing. Also, if I went in for a check up as an adult and the doctor just tried to hold me down and cut my penis no one would disagree with my drawing my .45 and putting 8 rounds in his chest, but because he did it when I was an infant no one cares.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:24 AM
1

What's out of proportion is how the average person views it. The foreskin contains 2.5 times as many fine touch nerve endings as the clitoris. MGM and FGM are completely comparable.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:21 AM
1

Totally agree.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:41 PM
1

I know exactly what you mean. I was actually just dwelling on that. Like how can I support an adults choice while also knowing that guy is more likely to force it on his child because he's happy with the choice he made for himself, or isn't happy and needs to convince himself by forcing it on his child.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:14 PM
1

Are you in America? You can't be charged for a hate crime for trolling your ex, so I'm pretty confident you are trying to troll us.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:05 PM
2

I really don't have a problem with marketing to adults. I'll have to look into it.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:59 PM
2

I don't know about the feminist twist with the whole internalized misogyny bit, but there is evidence that children that are taught to refer to their bits by the proper medical terms are less likely to be molested. It probably has something to do with not being embarrassed by the body and being more likely to know it's wrong. Not sure and I don't care enough to look up the studies.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:58 PM
3

Are they marketing this for circumcising children or just adults?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:45 PM
1

Clearly, but who cares what they think?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 06:22 PM
1

MRA's looking for rage bait in the comments section is just as silly as feminists finding rage bait in the original statement.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 06:21 PM
2

Absolutely. I'm like a human furnace and she was a petite little thing so it was very useful.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:44 PM
5

I don't even know what I am anymore. My friend referred to me as the most conservative liberal he's ever met. I vote left because I'm pro labor, and for religious freedom/secularization. I'm not fond of the lefts position on guns and feminism but there are enough blue dog democrats that I won't lose mine anytime soon.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:50 PM
1

I agree. My friend had a little blue heeler or something and it bit me, I back handed it across the room and it ran back licked my hand and laid on my foot.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:40 PM
5

In America it would be genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:30 PM
2

Well there goes my appetite. Thanks for helping me with my fast I guess.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:28 PM
7

An American of Jewish descent condoning Israel's actions...not surprising, and also doesn't belong on this sub.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:26 PM
2

I thought the "his and her" heat/AC controls in my new pickup was a stupid idea until driving back from Fargo one night with the girlfriend I had at the time. She was sleeping against my side because she was cold. I had my window cracked because I was not. Then I remembered I paid top dollar for that "stupid" feature. TL;DR: pointless anecdote, don't mind me.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:02 PM
6

Good analogy. My Newfoundland/Great Pyrenees required a lot of close attention when I raised him simply for being extremely large and powerful. My friends chihuahuas have no qualms about biting because no one bothered to discipline them since their bites are seen as a nuisance and not dangerous.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:56 PM
-1

That's not true. If someone throws a punch and with significant force and aggression to give you reason to believe they won't stop at one and may overwhelm you, you absolutely have the right to draw your gun. There is nothing that says you have to be outnumbered.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:47 PM
1

It would be a little insane to have a camera running all day. Like I said earlier if she attempts to make him leave he can pull out his phone and ask for a public statement.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:38 PM
1

This is terrible advice. Now it's a large threatening screaming man around children that the police come for. Not just a man taking his nephew to the park.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:09 PM
1

It's hard enough to simply take a kid to the park as a guy. Carrying a camera would be an obvious problem for a man today.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:11 PM
1

You are replying to the wrong guy.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 05:01 PM
4

Just seeing that name ruins the rest of my day. Every time.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:27 PM
1

I'd rather have not been cut but the payout probably would've softened the blow a little.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:38 PM
1

I don't think this possibly could've been explained better. mind blown http://i.imgur.com/UhlPQ9R.jpg
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:43 PM
-1

I think you lost it at "crazy bitches." I'm not saying every man with a child should have a go-pro helmet but if I were in that position I would simply pull out my phone as ask if she wants to publicly state their policy. If it's her personal sexist stance then she likely won't. If it's official policy and she's just following the rules you have some evidence for changing the rules.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:30 PM
1

Eh, wouldn't bother me, I'm a big boy. Though if this happened to me I would probably tell her while this is all good fun and I'm being a good sport, that had the situation been reversed I'd probably be in shackles.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:21 PM
0

You make a good point, but at the same time feminists aren't just focusing on women's issues and allowing MRA's to focus on men's. Many of them actively oppose men's issues. Like genital mutilation. Feminists attempt to shut down discussion of MGM because they believe it removes resources from FGM.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:17 PM
-1

I heard this movie was fucking hilarious, from men and women alike. Don't be so uptight. We aren't feminists and we shouldn't be looking for oppression points in everything.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:13 PM
3

You probably made the safest choice. Next time (hopefully this shit doesn't happen again) pull out your phone and record her saying that only you have to leave because you are a man while those other women get to stay.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:36 PM
1

You can keep saying that, but you simply can't remove functional tissue packed with two and a half times as many fine touch nerves as the clitoris and then allow the glans to keratinize and claim it feels the same. There is a difference. I've been restoring since November, not even close to finished, and I can feel the difference.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:30 PM
2

It's still mutilation whether it was done "correctly" or not. Men are just now starting to talk about it. There are over 250,000 men registered on foreskin restoration forums. The number of unhappy/angry men grows quite a bit when you consider the men who aren't happy and haven't found out about restoration, or are against it but have no interest in restoration.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:21 PM
2

I wouldn't trust a partner that thought it was ok to have our child mutilated.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:09 PM
1

If this isn't a troll post (I just can't see how a doctor could do this if a boy teenage boy tells him no. It also seems too convenient that she's spewing feminist rhetoric and choosing circumcision specifically to punish him for masturbation) then you need to get a lawyer, and stop it from happening. Physically. Go there, say no, and call the authorities.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:54 PM
3

I'm going have to watch this when I'm not at my sisters place. Hopefully it's not as bad as the "Mohels" song.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:47 PM
3

Since when is this sub not inclusive? There is like one asshole who says some transphobic shit when trans issues come up and he always gets downvoted to hell.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:33 PM
0

Circumcision is flat out wrong. It's sexual assault with a knife and affects a man for the rest of his life. Paternity leave. Proponents aren't trying to compare pregnancy and support. Some men actually want to be involved with their children at a stage of life crucial to bonding and to help out their partner.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:00 AM
3

Decreased uti's by less than a percent for the first year of life only means mutilating 100 boys to stop one uti which is easily treated by antibiotics. Condoms prevent sti's and babies aren't sexually active. Phimosis is easily treated by gentle stretching and creams and isn't diagnosable until adulthood.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:56 AM
3

Circumcision/bodily autonomy is number one. The rest of my list is the same as most others in here.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:49 AM
1

"Foreskin Man" is one of the most detrimental things to happen to the intactivism movement.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:44 AM
1

I think I'm going to attend every family gathering naked from now on so they can admire their work
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:41 PM
1

I hope so, I'm still trying to convince an ex who is pregnant but she is a nurse and has already been indoctrinated into that mindset.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:39 PM
1

I absolutely went too deep. I became friends with these people and enemies with many more. I was very into the idea of actually getting out there and protesting before that point. Maybe someday I'll come back to it. For now I'm focusing on restoring and I have talked to people I know personally about keeping their sons intact. I just talked to a good friend yesterday. Unfortunately the decision seems to be her husbands, but she told me they did watch one and thought it was horrific. Edit: I foun…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:28 AM
1

I'm absolutely still against MGM but I'm burnt out. I met too many intactivists who were just foreskin fetishists. Feminists who made male genital mutilation into a female victim situation (wives who were somehow victimized by having to fuck cut cocks) and saw in private groups women who would cheat on their cut husbands in order to experience sex with an intact man. They put it on a pedestal. Frankly I was against circumcision as soon as I found out I was cut, but I was still my totally confide…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:59 AM
9

I've met a few "feminists" through intactivism that are absolutely against all genital cutting. I have met far more feminists who are for male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:55 AM
1

Back when I was still involved in intactivism I actually managed to convince two of the biggest fetishists id ever met online that he was pure evil.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:14 AM
1

Jokes on you Neutrogena, most of my face is covered in beard. Long hair, don't care.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:30 AM
2

There is a small movement of Jews doing "Brit shalom," which is a naming ceremony, instead of "Brit milah." Hopefully it picks up a little steam.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:22 AM
1

When I was dating my ex, the father of her son took us bowling, we had some drinks, and we got to know each other. Don't be confrontational. It helps that they were in a "polyamorous" relationship before her and I were together and he wasn't jealous of me. They were both pretty reasonable people. He gave her money for diapers and necessities and she had no interest in getting courts involved for child support. Having said all that I want nothing to do with a single mother again. I still miss the…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:37 AM
1

Let me make this simple. •Routine infant circumcision does not cure ANYTHING! •Babies aren't at risk for STI's because they ARENT FUCKING SEXUALLY ACTIVE! •UTI's are treated with ANTIBIOTICS! •Any part of your body is easier to clean if you amputate it and no longer have to FUCKING WASH IT! STOP. CUTTING. BABIES.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:26 AM
2

Though the hood and foreskin are analogous structures, to claim circumcision is comparable to removal of the clitoral is absolutely false. The foreskin is highly innervated tissue that makes up half the skin of the penis, protects the glans to keep it moist, and provides a gliding movement that facilitates more comfortable intercourse for both partners. The clitoral hood is a small amount of tissue that protects the clitoris.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:15 AM
1

I have such a knee-jerk reaction to the words "Brian Morris" that I downvoted you without realizing it and had to change it to an upvote.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:02 AM
1

When does the pedo-hysteria come in? I don't care to listen to 40 minutes of that.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:45 PM
5

Religious freedom ends where another's body begins. The reason circumcision is still practiced by most Jews is because it's the one aspect of their faith they can force on another. Modern Jews don't have to stop eating bacon or shellfish because they can put their child on the chopping block and still be Jews.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:21 PM
1

What the ever loving fuck. If I had a son and they tried this shit with him they'd have a damn good fight. This is the point where a parent should be standing up against corruption physically.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:14 PM
1

I am aware of that.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 04:43 PM
2

You only have to believe that you need to use lethal force. Not saying that I'm going to draw my handgun at being pushed, but I'm a large guy and if someone shoves me unexpectedly with enough force to put me on the ground and hurt me, that's it. When I'm carrying any assault is considered deadly. If I'm incapacitated they can take my firearm and then myself and others could be seriously injured. I also have to assume that anyone who is ballsy enough to throttle me is on drugs or crazy.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 11:51 PM
3

The anti-male pedo hysteria today is overwhelming. I always felt like I had to look over my shoulder when I was at the park with my ex's two year old.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:51 PM
2

My parents aren't Jews. They had me cut because they are dipshits. Right, kids don't have the ability to consent so they can't consent to cosmetic procedures. Proxy consent is only legal for issues of medical necessity.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:34 PM
2

The first amendment protects an individuals religious freedom. Your freedom ends where another's body begins. PERSONAL liberty.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:32 PM
3

Cutting off part of my penis infringed on my goddamn liberties. If someone had spoken up and stopped my parents or had it been illegal their liberties would not have not been affected in the least. It was a brainless act on their part that does not affect them at all either way.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:24 PM
2

Cutting someone's genitals without their consent isn't the same as cutting someone's genitals without their consent?
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:21 PM
3

Genital mutilation is not protected under the first amendment. Freedom of religion doesn't allow me to force my religious rituals on others without their consent.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:19 PM
0

On one hand they try to defend MGM as a beautiful act of love and a covenant with their lord. On the other hand they acknowledge it as a grievous act of violence to perpetrate on their enemies.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:17 PM
21

Why outrage? Almost all commenters are acknowledging it as rape. It seems to be a very egalitarian thread.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:12 PM
2

Aww massivepenis-kun, don't be so tsundere!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:37 PM
2

You need a hug?
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:59 PM
5

Good luck with the crippling denial.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:56 PM
1

Male genital mutilation is only supported by those completely devoid of common sense.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:06 PM
0

I'd rather fund preventative measures than give the medical industry money to fix something they fucked up in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:12 AM
1

Go figure /u/MassivePenis would need to defend genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:37 AM
1

While we do recognize there are cases of domestic violence other than male perpetrated violence against women, even in those cases the perpetrator's sense of entitlement to control or dominate another remains the predominant cause of violence. JIMMIES REACHING CRITICAL RUSTLING
/r/MensRights03/07/14 06:26 AM
2

Rustling intensifies
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:29 PM
2

Free contraceptives from their own money. Those employees provide a service to the company and are being compensated.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:16 PM
1

I don't really think stupidity can be judged so harshly, but willful ignorance of this magnitude is a different story.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:41 PM
1

Haha, good point.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:00 PM
1

Though I don't think I'd ever be with someone that would think circumcision is ok anyways, it helps to be 6'3", 290, and have a wicked beard. I'm pretty sure most doctors are going to take me seriously.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:44 PM
3

If I was in his position I'd talk to a lawyer as well as making it clear to the doctor ahead of time that I absolutely do not consent, and that my son is not capable of consent. I'd probably also make him aware that whatever he did to my son I will be doing to him.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:55 PM
1

I have a trump card. I'm going to suck it up and talk to her dad who I'm pretty sure isn't cut.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:21 AM
0

I have a few Jewish friends that are against circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:17 AM
1

I'll try that.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:54 PM
2

http://37.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1f0ol5q4c1qbra0ho1_500.gif
/r/MensRights27/06/14 07:00 AM
3

I can't sleep and I'm actually bored enough to knowingly accept troll-bait, so enjoy this upvote. You earned it.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:46 AM
3

Alright I'll bite. My highschool girlfriend was a second degree black belt and when she hit me with a knee-up turn side-kick my feet left the ground. Your internet machismo wouldn't stop you from shitting blood just because you assume women can't hurt a man. EDIT: to be clear, she only hit me in the Dojang where it was ok for me to hit back and everyone had fun.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:32 AM
5

Thanks for sharing. I haven't had a woman grope me in some time but you would be surprised by how many women think they can walk up to me in a bar and just touch or grab my beard. Not comparable to what happened to you, just saying many have no concept of boundaries.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:26 AM
2

Well I won't be buying their shitty game. I'm not much into tabletop role-playing if that's what it is anyways.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:21 AM
6

Yes. That was the best analogy I've seen in a very long time. Apparently no one else got it.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:13 AM
9

http://i.imgur.com/UhlPQ9R.jpg
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:54 AM
2

It's really sad that people can be so mindless. As soon as I found out I was cut, a couple years ago, I knew immediately it was wrong. It just made sense to me.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:48 PM
5

Premature ejaculation can actually be a side effect of circumcision. Also, you still don't understand what vestigial means.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:52 PM
5

Been there, done that. I'm not giving up but she's a nurse and probably hopeless.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:26 PM
8

Great Scott! The craziest part is she knows they are hypocrites, and they are bragging about it!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:21 PM
4

She's having a son :-/ but she isn't too far along. I think it helps that we've been intimate so that when I tell her I hate it was done to me at least she can rule out the typical women responses (what a weirdo, he must suck in bed, he's probably tiny, etc) she also works with a doctor from Denmark so I'm trying to get her to ask this doctor about it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:48 PM
4

It really isn't. I have a friend who's pregnant (actually was my first love) who's a nurse. I've destroyed every single argument she's made about the subject but she just can't see why it's wrong.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:36 PM
9

This doesn't belong here. I'm also pretty damn supportive of breast feeding as well and if anyone had ever said shit to my ex while feeding her son I'd have had some choice words for them.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:02 PM
3

It serves several purposes such as protecting the glans to keep it moist and sensitive, providing natural lubrication and the gliding action makes sex more comfortable for both partners. Circumcision removes 20,000 fine touch nerve endings leaving you with only 4000 nerve endings in the glans which become less useful after it keratinizes. You calling the foreskin vestigial is your pathetic attempt to justify what was done to you.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:50 PM
6

If you have your son sexually assaulted because of potential locker room bullies, you're the only real bully he'll have to deal with in his life. It's idiotic to pick on the kid who actually has his entire cock anyways, and pretty easy to counter that.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:44 PM
4

Good for you. It's great that you are happy, but it still shouldn't have been done to you without your consent. Frankly you'd have been happy if it had been left alone as well, and would likely have more empathy for those who aren't because you'd actually know what it's like to have what they lost. The opinions of your partners is completely irrelevant to your right to bodily autonomy. It absolutely grinds my gears to see someone justify genital mutilation because American bimbos have never seen…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:35 PM
49

It's incredible that we even need studies to convince otherwise sane people that ripping, crushing, and cutting a newborns genitals is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:39 AM
2

Its a pretty big medical advancement. Once they actually develop the tissue they'd have to perfect the grafting method itself, and all the testing, then getting it approved for the market. It also will never be covered by insurance for being cosmetic (the irony) and frankly I don't see it ever looking right.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:32 AM
2

I doubt I'll see it in my lifetime, and even if I do I'll already be done restoring. Although at that point it would be nice if they could regenerate the nerves and frenulum. Even a pessimist like me can dream.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:41 AM
0

Foregen has been talked up for some time. It'll never happen. There is non-surgical restoration and though it takes maddeningly long, the medical industry has already profited off of cutting me, I won't pay them to fix it.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:38 AM
2

"Cosmetically" altering your child isn't a right. Parents don't have rights, they have responsibility. Your religious freedom ends where another's body begins.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:48 AM
11

I'm not minimizing shit. I'm tired of being told by women who have all their parts intact, while my genitals are scarred, to shut up because some women in the third world have been infibulated.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:29 PM
10

That's not even remotely true man. Cutting does not prevent infection. Hygiene prevents infection, antibiotics deal with infection.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:27 PM
3

The most widely practiced form of female circumcision is Sunat. It is performed most commonly in hospitals, and is the removal of a tiny sliver of the clitoral hood. You came to the wrong subreddit if you are going to talk out of your ass.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:24 PM
10

It is the same thing. The vast majority, 85%, of female circumcision is less damaging than RIC. Using the 15% that is infibulation to dismiss RIC is intellectually dishonest. Just as no one uses the horrifying aboriginal practice of sub-incision to dismiss what is done to girls in Sudan.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:21 PM
7

It's permanently disfiguring someone's genitals without their consent.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:18 PM
2

You wouldn't think your freedom to not have a stump for a cock trumps your parents "freedom" to have you permanently disfigured on a whim?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:09 PM
1

He should have specified half the skin of the penis.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:04 PM
1

It isn't possible to diagnose phimosis in an infant. The foreskin is fused to the glans and isn't retractable until an average age of ten and in some until 18.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:01 PM
2

He watched Elysium apparently. What I wouldn't do for one of those machines right now.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:49 PM
1

You nailed it man. By the same logic FGC would be ok because many in Africa don't care.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:33 PM
8

Bullshit. The child has still been sexually assaulted whether it was the mother or father chose for it to happen.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:23 PM
9

They do in America. In pretty much every conversation I've ever had about circumcision.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:18 PM
17

I'll have to paraphrase a friend. "Being told not to care about something you are passionate about because there are worse injustices is like ignoring the guy choking next to you because the building next door is on fire." I have to add, FGM is not worse. There are many variations of both FGC and MGC with different levels of severity. Dismissing routine circumcision as it's done in America because of infibulation in Sudan is as intellectually dishonest as dismissing infibulation because of penil…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:09 PM
3

Fully functioning That doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:02 AM
5

My adenoids had to be removed, my foreskin did not.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:35 PM
6

Having part of your cock forcibly removed is a big fucking deal.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:58 PM
7

This is THE FUCKING ISSUE. The first thing many men experience in the very first moments of their life is sexual assault and irreversible damage. Bodily autonomy is the most basic human right.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:20 PM
2

I'm pro-choice as well. As only the person actually affected should be making the choice.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:02 PM
3

It is always mutilation if it's done without your consent.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:59 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:20 PM
2

Yeah, condoms don't work as fast as cutting someone's cock and telling him he's immune to HIV for spreading aids for mass depopulation. (Sorry, my tinfoil hat is showing) it's horrible but I don't have as much sympathy for someone who gets it done as an adult, misinformation or not, as someone who had no choice. Just wish my tax money wasn't funding it.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:58 PM
1

He's pretty full of himself.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:23 AM
1

That's disgusting. "We are sorry that the vast majority of our citizens see your ritual mutilation for what it is, vile sexual-assault with a knife."
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:21 AM
1

Just when I thought the Scandinavian countries would tackle this issue. I can't help but feel happy it's only a religious issue there, and uncommon. It's something anyways.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:44 AM
1

I haven't been able to tolerate terry crews since I found out on twitter how big an asshole he is. When I have better reception I'll watch this, maybe it will change my mind.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:40 AM
2

It is very scary. I often wonder how my parents could be so detached to choose it in the first place when I immediately knew it was wrong despite 22 years of not seeing a penis in any other shape. Then of course my mother chose to make fun of me to my sister and her boyfriend about the whole shituation.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:27 AM
4

The word circumcision is like a light-switch for the average American/Jew/muslim's brain. There is so much cognitive dissonance when it comes to that word. I didn't even find out until I was 22 that I was cut, and I was instantly appalled. No research required, but that's certainly not common in my part of the country.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:01 AM
2

Because some of our tax money is already funding male genital mutilation in Africa as part of their "HIV prevention" campaign.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:57 AM
1

Circumcision (male genital mutilation) is at the top of my list. The other two fluctuate. I'm just about 25 and I don't have children. I've never been married. Circumcision is the only issue that affects me on a daily basis. I guess my solid number two would be the idea that men can't be seen with children, like fathers taking their children to the park, or when I sit in a waiting room at the clinic and some woman's 1.5 year old (guesstimation) wants to read me a story and I'm getting death glar…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:42 AM
3

He didn't call him pathetic. He, rather bluntly, described the all too real consequences of circumcision. The guy is missing highly innervated parts, and sexual function. It doesn't say anyone isn't a real man.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:14 AM
1

It's a one percent increase in the first year and even then that isn't taking into account improper care like forced retraction.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:01 AM
1

I wish I had been old enough to fight back.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:17 PM
2

I get nauseous when I see anything from Dr. Oz. I stopped scrolling at that point.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:53 PM
1

That's a personal problem. The guy is only addressing the fact of the matter.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:26 PM
1

It's not a generalization. You are missing the most highly innervated parts of your penis and several important functions. That is an indisputable biological fact.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:24 PM
2

No one said it's the only thing, but bodily autonomy is a pretty damn fundamental aspect. Boys are sexually assaulted at birth and no one in this sub should be treating the issue so cavalierly.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:48 PM
1

Thanks I found it after a bit of scrolling.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:45 PM
2

Foregen is never going to be approved in my lifetime. If you think genital mutilation isn't a serious issue what the fuck are you doing in this sub? The average male in America is welcomed into this world with clamps, straps, forceps and a blade.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:17 PM
3

Wtf. Why steal formula when their bodies make a better food for free?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:12 PM
1

There is no surgery to correct this. It can never be undone. There is a surgery to make a horrible looking, and insensitive mockery of the foreskin using scrotal tissue. The results look absolutely hideous and can be dangerous. Their is non-surgical restoration that uses gentle stretching to stimulate mitosis. The results are better but can take upwards of a decade to achieve and still do not restore the important sensory structures of the foreskin. Also, go sit and spin on a cactus.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:02 PM
2

I stupidly relied on pulling out with a girlfriend. Felt awesome though. My 22 year old self at the time was lucky.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:56 PM
9

I'd rather have a tattoo removed than deal with the next 4-10 years of foreskin restoration only to achieve a facade of what was taken from me. I started in November and just want it to be over.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:50 PM
5

"Religious freedom" I don't think that means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:48 PM
1

I could throw my ex's kid like wayyyy higher than she could, but she had the booby-milk. Was this on nickelodeons Facebook? Do you have a link to the original post?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:13 PM
2

Never again. Fell in love with two people 1700 miles away that I'll never see again.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 08:31 PM
1

I have once or twice. (Thanks circumcision /s)
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:13 AM
1

Minnesota, I am disappoint.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:36 PM
1

You dress up as cami from street fighter, I'm gonna ogle your goods. That should be a given.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:14 PM
1

I don't have a link but everything I read debunking that study said that the men who were circ'd were taught safe sex as well and told to abstain while they were healing, and the study was cut short after that so the only ones fucking in that time frame were the intact men.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:01 PM
1

85% of all fgm is equal to or less invasive than the mgm known as routine infant circumcision. That other 15 percent is the infibulation people immediately think of when fgm is brought up. 6 times as many men as women are mutilated also. The clitoris contains 8,000 nerve endings. The foreskin contains 20,000 fine touch nerve endings called meisners corpuscles. The Dartos fascia, rigged band, the frenulum (male g spot) and vasopressin receptors (the same receptors that release oxytocin in women i…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:54 PM
1

Yikes, what if this guy had been carrying? If anyone ran up on me pointing guns at me without identifying themselves it would get ugly...
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:00 AM
2

Oh ok, i gotcha. I haven't been to atheism+ so I didn't know it had ulterior motives. Now I know to avoid them...and knowing is half the battle!
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:09 PM
1

What does atheism have to do with feminism?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:52 AM
1

This shit is why guys my age are too afraid to approach women.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:54 AM
2

Way to go Jezebel. Take something fun and try to pervert it into something dirty and misandrist.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:46 AM
1

I was starting to think it was "hammer-space"... Sure you aren't a video game character?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:03 AM
1

I just checked it out on twitter.. Now I need to buy some ammo and blow off some steam.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:34 PM
1

VICTOLY!
/r/MensRights04/02/13 12:32 AM
4

My eyes are a little watery after that... So fucked up.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:17 PM
1

I just had a talk with my younger bro about this the other night. Interesting.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:31 AM
1

Just read that in Gilbert's voice. Wonderful.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:31 PM
1

Just did that... Wow. I don't even have words for that.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter