TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

serenitary Archive

View 1 posts and 115 comments by serenitary on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

serenitary/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

hmm, i wonder who called me "morbidly obese", "moron", and "retard"...
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 03:47 AM
-1

Perhaps what you find degrading is the fact that we took the pussy off the pedestal. That's not degrading, it's facing reality. You can do that without, you know, also convincing yourself that they're morally and intellectually inferior to men. Just a thought.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:11 AM
1

lol, tired of this echo chamber?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:45 AM
-3

Except that acting on / your / instincts requires that you degrade half of the population. Sounds like an easy way out of the real problem, which is fear of emotional intimacy with women combined with a kind of childish bitterness.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:31 PM
-11

No wonder you guys can't trust women. you think they act according to their instincts, like animals. Would you like to be treated and viewed as an animal?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:27 AM
3

is there actually any evidence for ballot stuffing, or is this blogger just projecting?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:17 AM
1

The sense I get is that she probably wasn't a good match for MIT. 90% of people at MIT wouldn't be a good match for MIT if you looked at their self esteem and happiness levels. And no, few schools have the science prestige of MIT. The access to research and professors is unparalleled. So for me, sometimes it feels the time spent on those subjects is irrelevant - it just flies by because I'm simply having fun trying to decode the problem at hand. Yes, that's fun when you don't have 40+ hours of e…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 05:40 AM
1

If she didn't think it was healthy, she simply could have chosen not to attend. That's easy to say, but most people 1) enjoy the visit weekends because of the people they meet, 2) keep in mind the name of the school, and 3) this is the key part: they were accepted because they had academically challenged themselves and wanted to do that even more. Besides, 48 hours a week isn't even that bad as far as a work load goes, and I see nothing unusual about it being considered a minimum amount of work …
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 04:57 AM
1

It's intensive, but that doesn't mean you're "wrong" for complaining about it. In fact, there's a problem with mental health at MIT: 90% of women feel that they're in the bottom half of the class. When an environment is that competitive, it is natural--and healthy-- to respond to it in some way. If you expect otherwise--to never complain about the immense pressure and courseload--isn't that being cruel? She didn't say that 48 hours was too much-- she graduated, after all; she acknowledged that i…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 03:28 AM
1

Have you ever been to MIT.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 03:01 AM
3

what the rest of the this thread is talking about
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:59 AM
6

"i mean, it was coercion, but she didn't sue me at the end so.." oh wait.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:33 AM
6

not when you've been raped.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:45 AM
7

nope, as long as you don't rape other people to stay happy
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:00 PM
9

Oh, I get it! self-respect because you only respect yourself!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:16 PM
6

.....what? I guess your top priority is sex.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:45 AM
9

That I slump my shoulders and and groan okay to what? respecting her decision not to engage in anal sex? didn't put up with her bullshit which was?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:54 AM
2

it's okay. I don't degrade half of the population. :)
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 07:04 AM
2

by which I mean I feel sorry for you.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 06:04 AM
1

If I hated women, why would I be following TRP in order to have more in my life. And yet, that is the exact theme of many posts.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 04:27 AM
0

I have had more women combined than the year before. They think it's about hating women, which is ridiculous. How in the world does one imply the converse of the other?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 01:55 AM
2

Thats not to say they're cruel and heartless but they will look out for their own interests before doing 'whats right'. I find that ironic given that this sub is dedicated to its members' own interests. Are you doing what's morally right by being sexist and demeaning toward one half of the population?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 01:45 AM
2

Wow, you're a delightful one.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 01:33 AM
1

How is sexism empathy?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 12:10 AM
1

And it's also entirely false if you want to be in any sort of trusting, loving relationship.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 11:59 PM
1

Also, I'm female.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 09:29 PM
1

Its general sense and style as an attempt of counter-argument Yes, I used statistics.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 09:18 PM
1

What distinguishes men from women is the male ability to create mathematics 31% of math PhD's are female. I guess you've done proof-based math before, then? real analysis or algebra?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 12:45 AM
1

Thanks, but I'm going into research.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 06:23 PM
1

Nope, Comp Sci major .
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 01:49 AM
1

Lol, I'm also like half your age so that's probably correct. :P
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 01:39 AM
1

Well, I think IQ tests are bullshit, but apparently you don't. 143, 99.79 percentile.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 01:27 AM
1

Do you think I'm intellectually inferior to you?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 11:12 PM
1

Which means?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 09:35 PM
1

what's the result?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 08:05 PM
1

So being sexist (aka thinking women are inferior in every way) benefits you and thus is in your self interest? Many other people aren't sexist, yet they are capable of having successful, committed relationships.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:55 PM
1

It's so much about you, you and you that you've forgotten the basics of treating people decently. Is sex really that important?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:45 PM
1

No, I was bring specific. It is in your best interest to automatically assume that women are inferior to men, intellectually or otherwise, thus making it easier to treat them like machines for sex instead of in equals.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:34 PM
1

You stated that women are intellectual inferior to men. This justifies any sexism you have against them.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:01 PM
1

You completely lack empathy. Got anything to say about that?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:31 PM
1

And God forbid that women actually like to be dehumanized!
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:17 PM
1

And it, according to you, would be in your best interest to dehumanize half of the population.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:06 PM
1

Woman*
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 04:39 PM
1

You need to sit down and ask yourself if you personally have ever gotten anything from a woman to justify you acting the way you do about them. No, I'm saying you are, by expecting sex from the world. "personally have ever gotten anything"? Sounds a teeny bit entitled to me. It's amusing. Also, I'm becoming a more rational thinker by doing exactly the opposite of what is promoted in RP.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 04:05 PM
1

Also, you think that if the opposite gender hasn't magically granted me with sex, then there's something wrong with the situation. Doesn't that sound like the " nice guys" that are so despised on here?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 02:48 PM
1

Lol, what? I'm doing this for you to understand my perspective. No one's reading these threads except me and you. I'm already in a committed, loving relationship of two years. But even if i weren't, I wouldn't change my viewpoint so I could get more sex. That's not all the world, or relationships in general, has to offer.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 02:38 PM
1

How many women have been noteworthy thinkers remembered through the ages? How many great works have they produced? I direct you to this essay. In particular, "The fact of the matter is that there have been no supremely great women artists, as far as we know, although there have been many interesting and very good ones, who remain insufficiently investigated or appreciated; nor have there been any great Lithuanian jazz pianists, nor Eskimo tennis players, no matter how much we might wish there ha…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:06 AM
1

No, my claim about tissue interconnectivity.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 04:51 AM
1

Justification is unnecessary. Did you even read my response on interconnective tissue? You're basically positing that males are superior over females intellectually, and yet you offer no evidence to prove that other than your own self-righteousness. I really, really wish you luck in your future relationships, because in this mindset, you will never experience true connection, trust, and love. But it's okay, as long as you're having sex, right?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 03:48 AM
1

Such dismissal. Doesn't disprove my claim.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 03:38 AM
1

It's of consequence but not in the direction you want :)
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 03:18 AM
1

The paper you cited states that females have more brain interconnectivity. Lobotomy removes interconnectivity. So that's a consequential architectural difference which immediately suggests that males are less able to integrate information. Wow, such male intellectual superiority here. Point is, you're using differences to justify women's intellectual inferiority, and hence your one-dimensional treatment of them, when that does not immediately follow at all.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 03:05 AM
1

Does the difference justify male superiority?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 02:50 AM
0

Also, the first study does not suggest anything about intellectual capacity.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 11:55 PM
0

But also this, in direct rebuttal to your first link. This study uses 13,000 participants. Also, the second study you posted put men and women in a very specific scenario from which you cannot generalize a statement as massive as "gender X has inferior intellectual capacity".
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 11:37 PM
0

Yet you yourself offered an example (pregnancy) that illustrates that the genders are different. Again, there are physical differences among the genders, but no difference in mental and intellectual capacity, which for me means that both genders should be treated equally. If you believe that there is a point on the list of differences where they cease being wholly attributable to gender and start being attributable to the individual regardless of gender For redpillers? Hypergamy. The whole "cock…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 07:05 PM
0

From your first reply: It has a biological origin which has both neurological and physiological implications. I'm guessing you use those "neurological implications" to make massive generalizations about the behavior of women, and what they do or don't want. And more: Women's innate hypergamy doesn't give a fuck about the ten millenia of custom and affectation and civilization we've built up. It only cares about who's doing best and who would do best if things went to hell. Stockhome syndrome IS …
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 06:22 AM
0

And the base assumption in this sub is that by default, women are always a burden to others. Also, just a note.. do men not lean on others, i.e., ask others for help, in order to achieve their goals?
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 06:10 AM
0

What do you think about women and their place in society? What kind of value judgments do you make of them and why?
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 04:55 AM
0

Yet, this entire sub is dedicated to the stereotyping and dehumanization of women, while glorifying sex. It's not that hard to realize that all humans have traits that you attribute solely to women. http://i.imgur.com/qutEGRb.png
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 04:42 AM
0

Men can't conceive children. By your logic, that makes them unequal to women.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 04:31 AM
-1

No, treating people equally means taking into account actual physical differences.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 04:12 AM
1

The erroneous view of treating people equally, regardless of gender? you can believe that I'm "wrong" as much as you'd like.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:54 AM
-2

You mean that a certain subset of women like you. Exactly the kind, in fact, who fuel your stereotypes of women the most.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:34 AM
2

So you're admitting that you don't treat women normally, aka, as a human being. Yep, sounds like 99% of this sub.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 03:24 AM
1

Ladies, our intelligence doesn't matter as much as we were taught it does. Implying that the tastes of men dictate what we should think is important???? credentials aren't a sign of intelligence. Women get PhD's too? That actually involves writing a long-ass dissertation and original research? Or do you think all women major in Women's Studies? :P
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/14 07:03 AM
2

why is this important?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 08:24 PM
1

That's after you've been arrested.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:33 PM
1

I wish there were some numbers on that.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:31 PM
2

Yep, it's sexist. Also, AP Calc is mostly regurgitation too.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 08:08 AM
-1

Women commit a lower percentage of crimes (by arrest). I'm all for equal sentencing, but the claim that if that existed then men and women would somehow make up equal numbers of the prison population is a little unfounded. In fact, I'm not even sure what the MRA intend to do with this.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:04 AM
1

This article says that women make up about 20% of drug-related arrests.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:54 AM
-12

Why does this strike down male privilege, again? You're choosing whether or not you go to jail by choosing to commit a crime.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:59 AM
0

on college admission's boards Got any sources there?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:26 AM
1

Right. Which is dumb.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:41 PM
1

Really? I feel like women who don't want to have children would welcome this--it's less upkeep than the pill. Also, in relationships, couples have open communication about these things, so disagreements would be worked out the normal way.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:26 PM
0

It might have worked if you had limited it only to women who take programming classes, but there aren't that many who do that, are there? Perhaps because of the time investment. Oh wait. My CS class was over 50% female. But we don't do specific examples here, do we? Especially in the types of subjects women generally gravitate too. And which are those?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:47 PM
1

The majority of people who maintain servers and code are male. And if they were replaced by the abundance of women CS majors out there now, there would be no difference. Unless, of course, you think that coding requires biological ability.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:53 PM
-1

Haha. Good retort without a single shred of evidence. So you're saying. That women can't spend a a significant amount of time on something. Explain this: that the college graduation rate of women is higher. That four years of persistence and dedication and focus is, what, lies? That actually graduating with a degree doesn't take a significant amount of time.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:43 PM
0

It requires you to be willing to sacrifice large quantities of time, and that's something that most women simply aren't willing to do. Aren't willing, or have been repeatedly told that they aren't good at it? If a boy fails a math class, then other boys think he isn't good at math. If a girl fails a math class, boy think that girls aren't good at math. See the cycle that this creates?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:33 PM
0

Why I replied to it, that sentence wasn't there.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:19 PM
0

The computer you use, the internet you log onto, the millions of lines of code that enable you to do so many things with technology, men. That is incorrect.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:33 AM
1

It just seems to me that men don't have to "prove" anything to be viewed as a gamer by the rest of the (mostly male) gaming community, yet females do.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:56 AM
1

So it shouldn't matter if she speaks in-game /about/ the game, or anything else that shows she's a girl. Or are you saying she shouldn't speak at all?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:00 PM
1

So why is it upsetting that she says she's a girl? If the gaming community was about equality, then it wouldn't matter whether she said it or not; all gamers would be treated the same--that is, they have a common passion for video games--rather than by gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:16 AM
1

So, by your "logic", abusers like it when people make it harder for them to get away with it. I also notice that you ignored all of the male victims of abuse as well. I'm sure that wasn't sexism on your part at all....... I was mentioning perpetrators, not victims. Yep, I'm done.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:48 AM
1

The people who actually beat their wives are rejoicing at your comment. :)
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:10 AM
1

So what do you suggest women do instead, if they have this desire?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:52 AM
1

There's also the kind of feminism that supports all choices women make.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:26 AM
1

Yes, because all women are shallow, entitled people who degrade men.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:27 AM
2

Yep, that's true. And I don't think those are just gender roles--they can be societal as well.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:51 AM
1

Since those are physical traits that won't change.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:40 PM
1

Yay!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:24 AM
1

It doesn't matter what I say, really.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:12 AM
1

In your first post you mentioned that being taller, being older were undesirable factors in attraction. It seems like that's actually what you want though??
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:29 AM
1

That is true. But unconditional love is hard to find, and exists mostly in fairytales. In that situation, open communication's crucial in determining the future outcome of the relationship, as well as clearly-declared intentions about what each person finds most important. Life is pain, though we prefer to avoid it (and have loved ones avoid it)...
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:10 AM
1

Again, this is specific to a person, but I cannot imagine my bf ever losing that, even if he had a hard time publishing papers or something. It's just part of him--that being excited about something, whether it's CS or writing or just abstract ideas. But either way, I wouldn't want him to feel bad about it. This attraction thing should never block his possible happiness or comfort with himself. Easier said than done, of course..
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:54 AM
1

On the other hand when you like someone for having blue eyes or being German, that's not going to change any time soon. Oh. For me, core parts means your stance on social issues, how you view life, what your intellectual passions are, etc. There are definitely preferences that I have that sometimes he feels he isn't being accepted for, but I'm trying to change/undo that. I'm just like, brain, what are you even doing. So it's a cognitively intense process, but I'm glad that I went through it beca…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:39 AM
1

This is definitely specific to my boyfriend, but I can't think of anything right now that he wouldn't accept. All the things he's attracted to are core parts of me (nonconsumerist, stance on social issues, love of learning), and not anything I would change anytime soon. Maybe extremely poor hygiene???
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:20 AM
1

Oops, you changed your reply a little. Sorry, that example is weird because I'm frequently sarcastic and not a good cook at all. Also, in that scenario my boyfriend would literally not care at all.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:15 AM
1

Personally, I don't care much about society's perception of what "pretty' is. It feels strange to me that women need to modify their face or wear expensive clothing to be seen as pretty; that's just not the interesting part of what makes us people! If I want to do something differently w/ an aspect of my appearance it's not because I feel pressure to be pretty. On a societal scale, I can see trends in the vague associations between how you look and how you are treated, but in the environment I'm…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:11 AM
1

Huh, that's interesting. I think it's part of society's restrictions on both genders that things like status, richness, and achievement become somehow related to someone's personality or goodness, when that might not be true. Women tend to enjoy being helped by men who know what they're doing, so men feel the pressure to be skilled masters and ready to assist all the time. Doesn't that happen the other way around as well? If you weren't good at something, then why would it be weird to ask your g…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:01 AM
-3

No, just that the MRA people as a whole seems to reject any possibiliity that the views they hold might be illogical or stifling to all who disagree, even in the slightest. There's a lot of generalization of women going on, and of feminism; the radfems you use as examples don't really figure into 80% of real life women. Also, the generalizations the subreddit encourages of women prevent any possibility of appreciation of the complex humans women really are, which I'm sure as MRA's you would unde…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:16 PM
1

being experienced What do you mean by that? For example, is asking you for help not acceptable? achieving things That shows work ethic, which is not confined to any gender roles??? being weak Wait, so is this a negative character trait, or a trait you don't want to see in your attraction to her?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:01 PM
-3

Yes, and is that any worse than systematically downvoting all feminists, no matter what their views are?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:57 PM
1

well, I think everyone is judgmental to some degree, but the difference is whether you realize it or not...
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:40 PM
2

Sounds great! Open communication ftw!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:30 PM
3

I didn't expect that. In fact, I was expecting people to be human.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:02 PM
1

Nope! I'm glad you agree .^
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:41 PM
6

Whoa. I'm a woman, and I want that too!
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:11 PM
-5

Name me an example? I don't really go there.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:04 PM
-11

The problem is not the problem. The problem is you pointing out the problem. And that leads us to the obvious solution: silence the complainer. Yes, that's right, it is usually easier to shut up the victim than to punish the aggressor. That's interesting because this subreddit silences women who point out the problem
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:50 PM
-3

Is it sexist that many more men than women prefer engineering occupations by nature? No. Actually, yes. Have you ever thought about the effect of societal pressures on women's ability to choose a STEM profession? No, seriously. Tell me exactly how that is completely implausible. Its no more sexist that men & boys gravitating toward entertainment formats that become male majority in make-up. And the reason why it's a male majority is because the industry, in the 90's, specifically marketed it to …
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:27 AM
-16

So what? you're blaming this on women? Or just complaining? Either way, that's very productive.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:06 AM
1

wow, and they say this community's not misogynistic.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter