TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

seriouspostsonly Archive

View 1 posts and 196 comments by seriouspostsonly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Discussionseriouspostsonly/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 04:11 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Women with inflated egos are probably least likely to go for men who display such low level behavior as cat calling. "low level behavior as cat calling" This is your opinion. In some cultures its expected and in others only those who are attractive enough to get away with it do, and those guys are signifying their status by being confident in genuine catcalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 02:41 AM
0

They meant the type of people characterised by insta thots.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 02:08 AM
3

There is no such thing as objective morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:40 PM
1

Yeah, you get it. Rights are promises to do violence on behalf of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:37 PM
0

One person acts in a particular way, the acted upon person maintains a relationship and acts in another reciprocal way in return. Both seem to be consenting to the relationship and what happens within it, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:27 PM
1

every kind of social interaction, by definition, would technically fall into ''transactional''. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:25 PM
6

This is not what your OP said I would say. This is not example 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:48 AM
1

I was just thinking the other day, about a third of the married men I know are likely cheating or actively trying to. So you were thinking, that you thought that 1/3rd of men you know -probably- in your opinion are cheating or trying to. And thats your proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:38 AM
10

Youve missed the point. Extroversion helps people be more successful in many aspects of life. No one thinks you can actually be more extroverted, no one is telling you how to feel, you are being told to act different to get different results.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 07:29 AM
1

Natural rights are a concept, a belief held, they are not a real actionable thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 03:52 AM
1

You also have no concept of what a right actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 03:43 AM
3

VOUCHSAFED by government So basically its a right if the people in the current society perform the actions to grant the right, when those actions would need to be performed in order to grant the right. So in other words real life people give the rights, live.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 01:13 AM
1

Amazingly, Atlas, an incredibly redpilled person, actually doesnt understand what a right actually is. Or so Ive been led to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:57 AM
3

You would be able to make yourself miscarry. therefore, right to an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:55 AM
2

So if the rights we have in practice are those which the current society upholds, and only because the current society around you upholds those rights, how the hell are they intrinsic? Inalienable?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:50 AM
2

This alludes to the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:48 AM
1

Firstly, you believe that 'we just have them, born with them'. Well unless you define a right completely differently to me, then you are wrong here. So please answer my question. "What actually is a right"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:44 AM
2

There is no theory of right. A right is a specific thing. It seems to me that you dont actually know what a right is. thats the naivety. Most people, the vast majority dont know what a right is, but you are redpill AF, so I expected more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:37 AM
1

So then a right is just any time a person says that someone is entitled to something?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:32 AM
2

Lol. Atlas, this is pure naivety, Im disappointed. Define what a right is, in your own words and we will see if you and I are even talking about the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:31 AM
1

What is a right? please define it in your own words.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:09 AM
4

So they arent intrinsic, they have been promised by a society, for those within that society, and are often upheld. thats not intrinsic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:09 AM
3

They are intrinsic Im not sure that you understand what A right is, or how it comes about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 11:57 PM
9

Good luck, 5 million years of evolution and women rewarding every 'toxic masculine' action with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 08:24 AM
1

To add to this, women do not find funnier guys more attractive, they find guys they are attracted funnier.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:52 PM
3

Better than women at basically everything. Yeah, that's good. We built almost everything you've ever known.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 10:50 PM
1

So if the majority were scum, then the default assumption is that any individual is. Until proven otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 10:11 PM
3

Err. NASMALT isnt an issue for anyone except the single moms. Soo. Nah I dont have that issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 03:25 PM
3

But if we defined it, and it happened to be the properties that single women, as a statistical group hold, then yeah, single mothers would be scum. Define scum how you want, and if you want to define it with the same properties single mothers as a group have, then yeah single moms are scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 03:06 PM
3

Something like "single mothers are scum" is never going to be a "act" as it is clearly an opinion. Youd have to define scum I guess, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 02:59 PM
3

women perpetuate everything you just said. making the TRP things facts not just crazy opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 02:41 PM
3

HR is a group of women who couldn't make it as psychologists. That's like telling the police that the police did something wrong lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:26 AM
1

No, how !!??
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 04:00 AM
1

nah nah nah You said that the world would be fine if there were no discrimination allowed. I gave an every day example showing that any choice amongst competitors is discrimination. Now you claim that you and I are arguing different thing. However my original point is that discrimination is not illegal and is infact absolutely necessary, its you who is arguing something different and infact is attacking the strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 01:08 AM
2

My point wasn't to knock RP's originality You did this by moving the goalposts. Ie, off topic discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 10:12 PM
1

walks into fruit shop (internal monologue) "damn I feel like a banana but there are 6 choices of fruit breeds, and discrimination is illegal, guess Ill starve."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 10:11 PM
1

Its not HRs job to prove a candidate has X property, its up to the candidate to convince HR. if you wank in stinking of alcohol youll be discriminated against for it. If you walk in with a face tattoo youll be discriminated against for that. If you walk in with gang colours the employer would be right to discriminate on the basis that the other people matching your description are unlikely to be good employees. If black people as a whole demonstrated that they would be excellent high achieving e…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 10:10 PM
1

Please consider what I say, I am being completely serious. Many people agree with me. Many. And they agree because their worldview, and the logic they have used to come to their conclusions lead them to see that what I have written is, in their opinion, a fact. You need to realize that simply insulting people like me will not lead you to anything but a pat on the back by those already convinced by your doctrine, and the rest rolling their eyes. At the very least you owe it to yourself to underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:56 AM
2

Discriminating in particular ways is illegal, but discrimination as an overall concept is not. The world would literally fall apart if it were illegal to discriminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:54 AM
1

Discriminating in particular ways is illegal, but discrimination as an overall concept is not. The world would literally fall apart if it were illegal to discriminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 06:54 AM
3

original You moved the goalposts. This is intentional dishonesty..
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 05:56 AM
1

Discrimination is illegal. No it is not. I don't want to hire a white person because I think they're going to be racist towards me and other staff members and it's going to cause problems. I'm not going to interview him. Its your business, you built it from the ground up, its your heart and soul, you feel free to interview whoever you think is the best candidate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 03:05 AM
1

Advantages conferred based on membership in a certain group. For example, the study that showed HR people are 50% more likely to invite a person with a white sounding name for an interview than a person with a black sounding name with the same qualifications. Yes but dont you think its probably because the black person is hugely more likely to be a worse candidate in ways not relating to which degrees they have, and in addition was much more likely to have progressed through education and receiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 03:03 AM
3

No no no no no, You dont get to just imply something. You have to actually say it. So, please go ahead and tell us how, using examples, most american women in college are oppressed. Thankyou, Ill wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 02:59 AM
3

I snapped his flip phone in half. No you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/16 04:45 AM
1

The first post of yours I fully agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 05:32 AM
1

Should we take the same attitude to the women of the world? They dont seem to appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 02:28 AM
1

you set where the goal post lay, never did we agree that the location of the goalpost that you set is relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 07:29 PM
3

the most successful groups will be the ones dedicated to continuous improvement. I think youll find that they are all about discussing what does and doesnt work in what environment and why
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:30 PM
1

Basically, everything this person has to say, and u/findingmrnemo is unlikely to even reply, they wouldnt reply to my last refutation of their assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:21 PM
1

I am still waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:17 PM
3

unuseful post, youve just insulted people. No one has been convinced by your post and youve contributed nothing. I believe that you need to convey what you believe and why if you want to convince people
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:06 PM
1

I made my point. My point is simple, I believe that men are doing better, and have always done better than women is ways which most modern people respect. They achieve more in the following important areas. They work more Earn more Create more things Invent more things Advance humanity further And they have more power over the direction of their lives, along with being more influential in the direction of the lives of those around them, ie they are the head of their families, relationships, comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 01:02 PM
6

true for any group at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 12:52 PM
1

So... you going to refute my point or leave me convinced that you are wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 12:51 PM
1

nice deflection bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 12:39 PM
2

Ahh.. no one cares what underwater knitting degree some one has. Who has all of the engineering/finance degrees, the income, the wealth?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 12:19 PM
2

fuck what the credentials say, what is their life quality like, their income, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 12:15 PM
2

In what regard?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 11:19 AM
3

We've discussed the fallacy that all men work longer hours than all women. Men as a group do work longer hours. Maternity/paternity leave should be equally allocated. Should but arent Both should (technically) be able to file false harassment suits if that's your thing. Should but arent
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 11:27 PM
5

You dont know the individual, you dont know them at all, they walked in 5 minutes ago. You have 2 candidates in front of you, one is male one is female. On paper both are identical in qualification and are the same age, 25. Only one could have made it to this stage with affirmative action. Only one is the gender who consistanly works longer hours. Only one is practically incapable of forcing maternity leave requirements on you. Only one can threaten with false claims of harassment. I can go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:51 PM
8

Yes but the reasons that men are hired first are for the exact reasons women are paid less. They are more valuable employees on average. Men work more and worse hours, take overtime, and just generally compete harder for payrises and promotions, which for the boss means a big group of employees trying to Impress them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:13 PM
1

Because all of those things align with right wing views... I mean, this seem very obvious to most.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 09:29 PM
2

I agree men are lagging behind in many ways Im not sure that true, Id be willing to bet that white people, and men both are the most successful groups regardless of modern feminism, in just about every conceivable way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 09:25 PM
1

If that were true circumcision and body piercing on babies would have dire legal penalties. But they dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 09:21 PM
1

No, he made the choice to have sex with the minute risk that it could result in pregnancy. Once a pregnancy occurs, what happens next is out of his hands. The exact same argument can be made against women in places where abortion is banned. Very few people here would support that argument made for women and their choices. So again as OP points out, why for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 08:48 PM
2

Yes, this does seem to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 08:47 PM
2

but TRP doesn't proclaim women aren't low value if they are sleeping around with high value men. Sleeping around with high value men and giving it up quickly to a high value man for the first time ever at the age of 25 are not the same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 08:45 PM
1

lol. Keep telling yourself that gender has nothing to do with who gets the most courtesy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 01:22 PM
1

"Courtesy aimed at strangers is completely non-gendered" Lol, listen to you :D
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 01:09 PM
2

We are both western. In the west women get the majority of courtesy especially when attractive. Its amazing that anyone would attempt to refute this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:45 AM
2

What a crazy assertion, we dont live on the same planet you and I.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:35 AM
1

Id love to see their argument against that, maybe a stat or 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 10:33 AM
4

Its not inconsistent if you yourself are high value. Would she put out for 25 year old Leo first date.. obviously.. Im saying heavy petting because im trying to be respectful to the inexperienced women who have fucked me on the first date. I tried not to have to be so blunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 08:09 AM
4

I never once said or even implied that. I simply said that if my game is on point and she is into me and keen for heavy petting im not surprised, and I know for a fact that when Im on my A game even quite inexperienced and shy girls can be very open to heavy petting with me. So loaded with that info I am able to decide whether its likely that this girl is a slut, or if I just did an amazing job at attracting someone who genuinely wouldnt otherwise be interested in heavy petting so soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:53 AM
1

once you become a father let me fix that for you. "Once a woman chooses for you to be a father against your will". better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:51 AM
1

She can just take the morning after pill, and she can give it up, and she can do whatever the hell she wants with it herself, afterall that was her choice. You;re literally saying "she can make the choice for him, and suck eggs", which isnt a real argument is just what you want to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 07:50 AM
3

YET, under terp theory, the fact she's eager for sex with you without knowing you all that well is 100% bonified indicia of sluthood/low value No no no, I am an attractive high value guy with excellent game, I'm not at all surprised that she is eager sooner rather than later. If I were an ugly fat slob then I'd be worried.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 05:29 AM
1

Once you bring a baby into this world I think you mean, "once a woman bypasses her options and chooses to bring a child into the world"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 08:54 PM
1

But ALSO somehow makes decisions on behalf of the man about his future. This is the issue, as you full well know.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 08:52 PM
1

This is a 'men always will if they can and in this case we know he couldnt' situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 01:02 PM
2

it's a sad state of affairs that the world knows what these women are doing and is trying to justify it and create social conditions for calling that a moral choice. Damned straight
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 12:11 PM
1

Thats fine, just go on your way and be pregnant and leave me alone, thats all anyone here is arguing for. You have a problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 11:48 AM
1

any laws or rights regarding it should be in terms of women. I cannot possibly even for a second agree with this. Youve just said, "men get fucked in every way because you dont carry the child personally". Nah, I cannot comprehend that idea, what the hell, just the whole gender suck eggs completely?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 11:29 AM
2

It shouldnt be the states problem either, unless you want to argue that women are not capable of taking responsibility for their choices, but I wouldnt argue that. Biology doesnt dictate it unless you are arguing the type of this RP guys do, claiming that women and men treat each other differently in that men take care of women because women are children or something. Biology dictates that 110% of the problem is womens because the man can walk at any time. The state has made it the opposite of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 09:40 AM
2

Like, before its been born its just an abortion but after its a murder.. Nah..
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 08:29 AM
1

There is no reply I can give you to this statement. The man already made his choice when he ejaculated. I cannot possibly fathom the kind of person who would genuinely defend this position. I just cannot. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 08:11 AM
0

You MUST be kidding..? WTF is wrong with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:16 AM
1

And the same is true for women, they should also abstain? You would defend removing womens right to emergency contraception?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:15 AM
1

I dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:15 AM
3

Old customs like.. slavery...? Servitude..? leaving unwanted children in the forest.. ? Come on, we are slicing body parts of newborn off without sedation what the fuck is wrong with people!?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:14 AM
1

Youre basically saying that you dont like the OP idea because it moves women closer to the deal men currently have. Now you understand how we feel. K thnx bai.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:06 AM
1

Abortions are legal because of the right to bodily autonomy. Again, I dont think that humanity as a whole buys this, Im fairly certain that the human race as a whole knows that abortion is about killing the child so that you dont have to raise it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:04 AM
2

It was the man's to get a vasectomy or not. You typically cannot get a vasectomy unless you are mid 30's or older and already have a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:01 AM
3

We dont recognise bodily autonomy as a fundamental right either, otherwise we wouldnt be able to circumcise boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:01 AM
1

The right to abortion is about the right to bodily autonomy. I dont buy this for a second, and Id be willing to bet that humanity as a whole would agree if you polled everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 07:00 AM
1

Like... any sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 06:58 AM
3

No safe haven laws exist because we have some issue with holding women responsible for their decisions. THAT. Women can literally just leave the thing out on the street with no consequence. the whole thing is fucked if you are a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 06:55 AM
2

You arent going to be reasonable at all but Ill humour you anyway. Women have every single option available to them at any time with zero consequence. The other option isnt ONLY a child, this thread infact is here to discuss the other fair and viable option.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 06:51 AM
2

20% is astronomical when you dont have any control of what happens next and the consequences last a lifetime. And again, even my GF laughed and shook her head at the idea of a condom AND pullout, it wouldnt even be worth fucking if that was the rules. What a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 06:49 AM
2

5% is still a huge risk when you have no control of what happens next. I cannot control the pill in any way. And again, having sex with a condom AND pulling out is not even worth doing, even my GF laughed at this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 06:48 AM
2

Condoms used properly don't have some astronomical rate of failure among couple having sex 3 times per week its approximately 20% per year.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 01:54 AM
3

All of my this. Exactly this. Its so easy to say what spacewhiskey did when the entire weight of the law and medicine are behind your gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 01:51 AM
2

"when combined" You expect men to want to fuck with a barrier AND coming by masturbation..? I told my girlfriend that someone considers condom combined with pullout to be viable and she laughed and just said "what would the point even be?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/16 01:43 AM
1

well then..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 11:22 PM
1

And again, citation?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/16 10:58 PM
2

Gay men also happen to be far more intelligent on average than straight men as well err...? Lol, citation?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 09:18 PM
1

That is true. The woman knows if he has done that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:31 AM
3

I think you're putting words in my mouth. Men can become parents. And they can become parents against their will via dishonesty. And they have no options at all to control this post conception, whilst women are afforded many, including just giving it away. And the law says, "sucked in bro.".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 08:30 AM
2

Men have one method which is not reliable, mind you its about as reliable as the pill is, for the average couple who has sex 3 times a week 20% each year will get pregnant whether using condoms or the pill, however, the pull out method is within a percent or 2 of condoms and the pill so it goes to show that the standard methods actually are all crap. But thats not the point, the point is that the women can choose to get rid of the child at any stage from before conception (hormonal, condoms etc …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:21 AM
0

Number 13 is way way way more important than most women seem to think. And women, you will find a guy who really is hot shit, and he knows it and he will drop you if you keep this one up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 04:04 AM
6

Basially women have a bunch of effective options however they arent without their flaws and compromises. Men have none and on top of this the law tells men: "go fuck yourselves, lol". So in a direct comparison women have it so good its a bit silly really.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/16 03:55 AM
3

This is true for every gender. We all get suspicious when we know things dont add up. Sounds normal for both genders to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 09:53 AM
1

Only now and only in the west, swings and roundabouts and all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 09:47 AM
2

Not sure what you're saying here or how it conflicts or even agrees with what I am saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 08:37 PM
9

Any work environment which was traditionally male dominated used to be: If you dont like the culture fuck off". Now its: If you dont like the culture and you dont have a vagina fuck off". Its just fucking shite and a huge rock in everyones shoe when multiple women show up on a jobsite.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:41 AM
1

Err. Maybe. I think its probably split among the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:36 AM
5

That one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:14 AM
3

Joke reply surely..
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 07:04 AM
1

Most guys arent having any sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 12:25 AM
1

I didnt say it broke a rule, I just dont know how this view with this attitude is tolerated but bans come for people who express the opposite view with the same emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:10 PM
1

This does not dispute what I said in any way..
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 11:09 PM
1

This does not dispute what I said in any way. You think most guys are satisfied?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 01:31 PM
1

Most women arent pleased with much at all. Not sure what stats about anything would prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 12:47 PM
2

How the fuck is this shit tolerated here but the opposite gets people banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 12:42 PM
1

Youre just an angry dude who is here to yell and shout and whatever. Nothing you say is useful its all just ad hominem and general anger, take a chill pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/16 06:51 AM
1

Offensive: 2. actively aggressive; attacking. Everything you post just about dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:31 AM
1

Feel free to respond to my point if youd like.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:30 AM
1

exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:29 AM
0

The point is that you wouldn't understand how vulnerable women feel day to day because of your male privilege. FEEL K then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:28 AM
2

You dont debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:26 AM
0

But many do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/16 07:26 AM
2

The harshest rejection is when she doesnt even say anything and her and her friends all just look at each other with this expression, whilst walking away. http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Embarrassed-Blonde-Girl-On-Glee.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:54 AM
1

The reality is that many women turn you down initially and take you up on it the second you show youre serious and secure enough to say, "nah for real, lets do it what have you got to lose." If women didnt ever use a No as a shit test less men would push.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:46 AM
2

what is that person has a horrible fucking job in order to earn that money, maybe they need time off to forget all the dead bodies they saw, or to get a massage to help with their herniated disk from their risky as fuck industrial position.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:42 AM
1

except that the 100k 40 hour worker might be, I dont know working harder, or doing something dangerous, or a job that needed 6 years training at his/her cost first.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:38 AM
1

For arguments sake you have Michelle and Jamal in court, Michelle has a history of 3 speeding tickets and one assault at a nightclub which she is on trial for. Jamal has a history of 6 assaults, posession and has been to jail 3 times already. Jamal is also on trial for a nightclub assault of identical nature to michelle, its obvious to anyone that Jamal will get a harsher sentence, because he deserves it. this is why men get such wildly harsh sentences for crimes which are gender-issue-less (ie …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:07 AM
1

Elaborate please.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 06:01 AM
1

Dude, it would serve your cause a lot better if you werent so incredibly offensive to read. Just take a chill pill and back it off a few notches.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:57 AM
1

A theif wont get worse they will get longer in jail, but id take 10y in jail as a thief over 2 months in jail as a pedophile.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:50 AM
1

Women get lighter sentences for the same reason that men get preference for most promotions. Because the individuals themselves deserve it due to their past actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:40 AM
2

it does. But honestly man, Ive seen enough of your posts to know that NOTHING will change your opinion about anything. So I wont bother.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:32 AM
1

Women have very little day to day vulnerability,overall they are much safer than men, have been for all of time, and in every place on earth. ..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:27 AM
1

regardless of whether you like hearing anti women advice, it works. Deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/16 05:17 AM
1

You're wrong. Im sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 11:19 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 07:22 AM
1

one in the same ...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 07:10 AM
3

It's a presence that SOME people can walk in and out of. Alphas are those people
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:58 AM
1

Redpill = pua.. in your opinion? If this is true then you literly are not qualified to oat on ppd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:56 AM
2

We won't get past this disagreement. You are a protected class. You are so protected that when someone jumps up and down to protect you it's even further proof of how hard you have it, because you need protection.. Next
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:56 AM
2

Monogamous relationship with a hotty who pays her own way, gives massages and fucks me twice a day. So far so good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:48 AM
2

Ahhhh... Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:38 AM
4

That's like, your opinion man. Look. Some people are clearly more on the Alpha end. You can meet someone and know 30 seconds later if he is Alpha or beta. Read their body language, feel their presence. Not sure why we attack those who are clearly more Alpha if they mention it themself here in the context of ppd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:37 AM
3

We aren't ever going to get past this disagreement. It's insane to believe that men are treated better than women but here we are, a women with all the protections she is gifted by society pretending that it's so hard for her gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:28 AM
1

Please, go on. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:27 AM
9

You talk as if these women are toddlers. Sexist AF imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:17 AM
3

I've been referred to as Alpha by different women at different times in different contexts more than a few times. Usually when trying to describe another man. They usually refer to me as being Alpha to contrast my characteristics against another guys to help explain the other guy. (Eg, "ok, so he's not like you, he isn't alpha at all, he's a bit of a bitch really..") Now, if I said, I think I'm alpha on a scale of beta-alpha, you say that it would prove I was not in any way Alpha.. this is clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:13 AM
4

Red Pill(Not the subreddit) is just "Game". I couldn't disagree more. That's pua
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:10 AM
1

Currency has trading value, which is good, both you and he have equal trading value, but it also brings status, this is something it does MUUUUUUUUUCH more for men than for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/16 07:00 AM
1

You're delusional if you genuinely believe that the average woman prioritises her work as a part of her life as much as the average man. This combined with other obvious and genetic gender differences across the genders make them different as employees as groups. This will never change and employers will always know. While its true that some women are as serious about their job as the average man, until women as a group are as serious about work as the average man you will be treated differently…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 04:59 AM
2

There is no discussion to be had with someone who believes that women are men. So I'll stop. You need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 08:26 PM
1

But shouldn't an employer use his or her best judgement based on experience to choose how to spend their money? Don't you judge a particular Brand of service station before you pull up based on past experience with that Brand? Don't you judge particular types of sandwiches based on previous experience and preference for your needs. I agree that there is judgement but it's not mysoginy to understand that women are less committed workers, it's reality. Facts are not sexist, they are facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 08:16 PM
1

And if there are any cases of genuine discrimination, they are/were dealt with through the legal system. There is genuine discrimination wherever it's possible in ways that matter to the employer. If there was no discrimination he or she might as well pick employees using a lucky dip. The employer reads the resume, and takes the info in. Previous employment, length of employment, position, education, etc. These all lead him or her to judge the individual. Their past experience allows them to mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 08:12 PM
2

Hard to say, but a great many have been impeded by run of the mill misogyny. It has been recommended to me (and I have followed this advice to my benefit) that I hide my gender on my resume so that hiring managers don't make assumptions based on my sex. This isn't mysoginy, this is knowledge of gender differences proven time and time again with hard data. This would be like comparing Black minorities with incredibly Black sounding names to Asian men with Asian sounding names when trying to pick …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 08:06 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 07:47 PM
1

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 10:42 AM
1

go away. Thats the premise silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 07:27 AM
1

She is the victim of having been misled.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:56 AM
2

Please explain. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:41 AM
1

You aren't being very clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:40 AM
1

Absolutely Top comment right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 06:37 AM
1

Or the patriarchy forgiving her mistakes, protecting her when she doesn't protect herself, having family care and support her at levels men don't get, programs everywhere to give her an artificial step up, quotas in the workplace, low punishment for crime etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 05:48 AM
1

She says that she came to the same conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 04:17 AM
1

Translation: I love views which trigger my personal rage porn which helps my confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 03:04 AM
4

Men are more capable of doing serious damage, aren't they? When a small man aggravates a large man and gets hurt by the large man as a result, no one defends the small man. He will literature get laughed at and told that he asked for it. Your line of reasoning is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 02:55 AM
0

"asking for it" translates literary to, "they shouldn't be surprised by the outcome given the choices and circumstances". John talked shit and got hit, John was asking for it, John should not be surprised he got hit given the fact that he was talking shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/16 02:51 AM
2

Thats... exactly my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/16 09:51 AM
1

Self-righteous absolutism about it is infuriating. Theyd say the same thing about you. They are so sure that they are willing to shout about it, while you are so sure youre willing to kill an innocent over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 08:26 PM
3

Given your experience, do you empathize with the protesters? I think theyre pricks, but I find it hard not to empathize. Also yes Ive had unprotected sex with a fair few people, none of which I came in unless I knew they were on birth control. Yes its stupid. But when your drunk as fuck, horny as fuck and 18..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:21 PM
1

No he is saying that the properties that make someone above or below average are not what women believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:12 PM
2

He owns those resources. Is it ok for me to steal from you as long as I donate it to charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:58 AM
4

It sounds a lot like you are mad that you worked so hard in the wrong direction, considering that you seem to value validation so much. Again Ill repeat myself, the issue here is that you put a huge chunk of your lifetime in a pursuit which does not bring much validation, and you are pissed because it now is clear that your chosen path was no good for your goal of female validation. I already posted about this, the issue isnt that its unfair, its totally fair, the rules of the game have been set…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:46 AM
7

He should hardly be revered. Not by the dictionary definition. But Shkreli is the same, Im sure he doesnt care, some internet hate isnt worth worrying about when he made million and millions of dollars. But anyways, OP is just sour because he doesnt stack up, but no one and nothing owes him shit, he can only take whats given to him or what he can take for himself, hes just mad someone like Bilzerian was given so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:43 AM
4

What a horrible hateful thing to say. He owns it, its his money, should African children attack you because they found out that you bought frivolous things last week?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 01:38 AM
1

You sound really sour, I'm not sure why. The real problem is that those in the know intentionally keep others in the dark. If the STEM Bros had a dad who told them that relationships success came from masculinity and demonstrations of power and virility then those guys wouldn't have anyone to blame but themselves. This is the issue with every social problem, those in the know conspire against those who don't. From your boss to the govt, information which would bring you to their level of power i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 12:56 AM
1

Obviously. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/16 12:54 AM
21

You know theyre all paid right? He isnt fucking them all unless he pays. Also, forget him, he is genuinely a loser. Its true that he has stupid money, it was his dads, and he is fortunate to have it, but overall as a person he is a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/16 10:56 PM
3

Does that have anything to do with the OP post at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/16 10:22 AM
0

You cannot reach the opposite conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 01:14 AM
1

Yeah you can. Only people who very very must want to get married now do. not those who accidentally got pregnant, or were feeling like they were getting old and so needed to commit with marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 12:59 AM
1

No. I dont mean that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 04:11 PM
16

Id imagine the point is that women have a huge overall dating advantage, and thats sacred, not to be touched or talked about, whereas many advantages men have overall is the fault of the patriarchy and to be demonised.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 09:01 AM
3

I deal with the hand Ive been given, being poor as fuck with a broken family is a lot worse than gender issues. Male but, I grew up with poor girls too and its exceptionally clear that a broken family, and being poor AF is the biggest issue for an individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 05:10 AM
4

I mean, obviously. Whats your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 04:53 AM
2

Good effort, attempt to shame people. Also Ill point out that Im into older women, so im not defensive here, just pointing out your tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 04:42 AM
8

Nah. people in steady relationships, whether high value man, low value man or complete beta are sleeping with the same woman in mostly the same way repeatedly. She may be hot, or ugly it doesnt matter. Guys who have high N counts are sleeping with many women, in different circumstances and in different ways. This is akin to someone who only ever eats steak, nothing else, or only ever eats lobster, nothing else, or ramen, nothing else being envious of someone with a varied diet.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/16 04:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter