TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

setsfires Archive

View 0 posts and 194 comments by setsfires on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, especially for the rps who want a ltr
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 11:39 AM
2

The conclusion can go much further than that if it's taken to the extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 01:44 AM
1

I think you get it. It's human nature to make assumptions and generalizations. We are all guilty of doing it as (usually) a self defense mechanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 04:43 PM
16

Why are rp's obsessed with cuckolding? Do you have anything to back this up?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:44 AM
1

We have ourselves a special kind of troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:34 AM
1

It's not specific to trp, but the to the people of groups that have a mindset that sets the sexes too far apart. Are you a Millennial?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 11:50 AM
1

I don't pity "alpha males", your first paragraph doesn't touch on what I'm attempting to convey. Also, for the record, I'm not an idealist. Far from it, your comment on ceo's is right on. Other than that we seem to be on somewhat of the same wavelength.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 11:02 PM
1

I agree, avoid psychotic women, women who want to use you. For that matter, avoid all people like that. It's not hate, it's more complex. Some of it is a deep pity that many of you will never know so much. The big picture isn't in any of your periphery, instead of enjoying the decline by being a part of it, the sexes allow themselves to be separated by stupid propaganda. Women and men make great teams, both are inclined to act in certain ways that compliment each other when understood and not us…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:32 PM
1

It's an issue on a human level. I don't think I have a problem with awalt. It's a tautology* to trp so it's funny. That's about it. I don't think women or men are special, they're all terrible, yet interesting, and sometimes great. My opinion, trp puts women on a higher pedestal than a "bluepill" person. A whole sub dedicated to handling women. Dedicated obsession. On that note, I do hope people like trp's, mra's, and feminists take over and fuck the world up entirely. You all deserve nothing le…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 07:19 PM
1

I literally did not say said that. I said he has no balls and should say it in public, and that I'd like to watch the results. Whether he's right or wrong has nothing to do with mass public opinion. You should follow your own advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 02:41 AM
1

Where did I say that? Are you saying opinions = truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/15 11:36 AM
1

Indeed. Your balls statement belongs in r/showerthoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 11:04 PM
1

Is that rhetorical? Women in general or feminists? I have no issue with women leading if they are egalitarian and see the stupidity and danger of radicals.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 01:10 PM
6

I think he has no balls. Sure, it's easy to spout this shit on the internet. Send him to a public place with a bullhorn to repeat this. Please record and upload for our viewing pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 12:18 PM
1

Veering away a little from your post, (dare I say this) it's a disappointment in some ways. I admit I don't pay close attention, however, when there's news about something done by radical feminists it's scary. The mattress girl, for this example, the guy was found innocent but she continued to drag his name through the mud when his life was already made into hell. We don't know the specifics, but that sort of behavior is twisted and borderline crazy, it hurts their movement. Who can take that se…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 12:13 PM
2

Why does she view them as only sex objects? If that's all she thinks they're good for, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 11:56 AM
1

Let them decide. If you haven't seen it yet, when a post comes across as a shit post (or lousy) they ask the op to repost with something more substantial.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 05:39 PM
1

People already add at least a couple sentences of explanation. How about if the mods delete the obvious shit posts?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 01:20 PM
2

The problem with this is both bp and rp post loaded questions, and it's not always intentional. Either side holds their perception. We have posts from u/happilysinglewoman (as a good example), where she posts a question. It allows the question to be answered without rp taking complete offense because she didn't add on more for the sake of expanding. Instead she asks for them to expand. A lot of ppd is understanding another point of view. Sometimes less is more. Tl;dr I disagree, this will not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/15 04:02 AM
3

Exactly, or we'll have posts that are four sentences of fluff. There's nothing wrong with a succinct response.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 09:30 PM
1

Make a throwaway, and don't direct link it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 02:06 AM
1

Sure. Have an upvote. Make this somewhat politically correct so you don't get banned and post this in the cmv sub. Unless you're afraid they'll prove you wrong. Link us if you're not a chicken shit, I'd like to read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 01:55 AM
1

Change your view? This isn't a view, this is a shortage of knowledge. There isn't enough time or space here to catch you up to date. Not knowing doesn't make you correct, it makes you ignorant. If you want your view changed go pick up a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 01:41 AM
2

Humans have lost their sense of adventure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 01:04 AM
1

It does? I don't know, it was a joke. In all seriousness, in that context it sounds innocuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 12:28 AM
1

Actions always have consequences. There is no such thing as activity in a vacuum. Bad activities don't always have negative results for the doer, though I agree with you here. Do you need one? If you do, perhaps I can find something suitable that'll make you feel better... ??? No. I'm going through a BP Anger Phase©. Unlike trp which causes a distrust and dislike of women, TBP combined with TRP causes a distrust and dislike of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:15 PM
1

If you get caught. As for the rest, is there rhyme or reason? One person is born with a silver spoon and the other is born in a third world country. Do either deserve to be shit upon? Maybe, maybe not, but it happens without apparent discrimination. All hail Alan Watts
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 10:13 PM
0

Why do we have to be moral or good?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 08:51 PM
-1

Again, you can't differentiate between being younger than 18 and being below age of consent. They aren't the same thing. Again, I can. If women are as incompetent as trp claims then they shouldn't be allowed to breed. The age of consent needs to be changed to never. Otherwise men will be placing women in a situation they don't have the mental or legal ability to handle as an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 07:22 PM
1

Nice jab. Imagine the repercussions. Anytime a woman alleged rape the man would be charged as if she was a minor. We have enough of that already, don't we?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 04:50 PM
1

You think they should be treated as minors in all respects except when sex is involved? They're not capable of raising children, making their own decisions, they can't make proper choices, that includes sex which may result in pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 04:32 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 03:47 PM
0

Then nothing should be illegal. No one should have consequences for their actions since they're slaves to their biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 03:40 PM
1

Including that they're treated as minors in regard to sex as well. In other words, following this train of logic, sex with any woman should be illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 03:36 PM
2

Their opinion would be even more interesting to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:28 PM
4

Question: If, according to trp, women are children and can't control themselves (unlike men), why should they get the same legal treatment? We can't hold a woman accountable for rape, false rape accusations, and crimes if she has little to no agency. It makes sense that they (supposedly) get everything easier, doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:26 PM
10

I'd like to know why people downvote when they disagree instead of replying. It would be more interesting. From here out I'm randomly upvoting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:47 AM
3

Do you mean the type of people who can't have one because they get bored or the r/foreveralone type?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 02:09 AM
1

Except I'm not debating you or nomdplume. I'm responding. My fault was in using a universal for "sane people will laugh at trp", when sane people could also feel disgusted, saddened, angered,frightened, etc. Think of it as awalt, it's the same for all of them, but not really all of them, but likely most of them, so pretend it's all of them anyway. Wait, narpalt. I forgot. What you are missing is the point, men go to trp in need of advice, many leave because of the extremely fucked up comments. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 01:04 AM
-1

You're more moderate than the rest. As per ciswhitemaelstrom: Whatever. Men don't deserve to live in a world full of empowered women that are such fucking useless whores that they literally pat themselves on the back for taking shits and for fingering themselves and they certainly don't deserve one of them for a mother. Let the population decline, the resources run out, and the whores have to beg the whoever's left to help them out, and God fucking hope that the men tell them to fuck off and opp…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 11:53 AM
-1

I'm not convinced of your take on these studies. I don't see how it's a red pill conclusion that men find physical attraction more important than women do. Women look for stability, men look for attractiveness. We know this, I thought you had something more. Regardless, we are seeing the studies differently. As for the household chores, again, correct, it claims that women are happier when they feel the chores are fair they are less depressed. Unhappy woman means more fighting and less sex, corr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 10:03 PM
1

The question was how do they support trp. You say your claim is supported by the article, how? State the trp belief, (not the part that is already accepted by the majority of people) and point out how the article backs you. The article I posted states relationships are better when housework is shared, and yes, 20 pages isn't much of a read. By the way, you're contradicting yourself between what you claim I don't know and your shit flinging. Look, I can insult you back, but does it help my argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:34 PM
1

Nice disclaimer. How do the first two journal abstracts back up trp? An interesting quote from the second one: "For example, the stereotype that only successful men tend to pair off with beautiful partners (Bar-Tal & Saxe, 1976; Sigall & Landy, 1973) could increase ratings for physical attractiveness only for male respondents, who might perceive that responding that they do not seek a good-looking partner implies that they are not worthy of such a partner. Thus, gender-specific stereotypes could…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 03:07 PM
0

Feminism devalues all of the traditional feminine values and instead promotes masculine values. Managing a household is useless and mundane compared to working a job, a woman will never amount to anything by staying at home. Men are inherently evil, they have natural urges to abuse and rape women, they objectify women and need to be taught how to be civilized and not follow their base desires. Women are incapable of handling their own problems, they require environments to tailored to be 'safe',…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 02:32 PM
1

When she asks what you're doing tell her to shut up and keep sucking
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 07:51 PM
2

My secretary is blowing me as I type this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 07:43 PM
2

I see your point. It sounds like "don't date out of you're league."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 08:28 PM
5

I can see that if he left her, but what if she left him?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 08:01 PM
4

No, I'm saying men and women are equally shitty. It's not irrelevant, it's extremely relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:57 PM
3

I can't tell if you're agreeing or joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:51 PM
3

You don't think gender dynamics are interesting? It's important rpers see that they're not the special victimized snowflakes they think they are. I'll take your comment as men can be alpha widows. Edit. Words
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:50 PM
4

Competing? He's gone. If you never knew he was one of her exes, you would have been fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:48 PM
5

No more than I've heard husbands complain about their wives, comparing them to exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:46 PM
6

It's fiction and an exaggeration.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:38 PM
2

Believable? A little, they're exaggerated. How was Rose heroic? Edit: question
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:33 PM
3

You've never experienced a similar thought/feeling as a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:31 PM
5

How can you not take characters from screenplays written by men as proof? Yes, it's what you said and the rest is projection of how trp feels about their exes onto women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:15 PM
5

Nothing. It's a constant form of entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 07:02 PM
0

That's a white knight? I thought that was rp? I've been under the impression that rp are sjw. Or are they the same thing? Edit: to say that type of comment is rp, without his other twitter comments for better context.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 02:47 PM
1

I say it's unfortunate that society has to tell women that men can become dangerous when they're drunk. Common sense says it's a bad idea. If she goes and something bad occurs, don't be surprised. Also, don't be surprised when women go after the man with pitchforks. Round and round it goes. Does anyone deserve to be hurt, no, but I smile inside when it's child molesters, serial killers, and the like. I'm a horrible person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 07:13 PM
0

This is Reddit, deal with it. I believe in using common sense, call it what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 06:18 PM
4

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gmqpQb6x74M Nearly all rap A lot of classic rock Almost anything by the beastie boys This list goes on as well
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 05:26 PM
6

"You Belong to Me" by the Dupree's. If a woman sang it...wait, never mind, both men and women have been singing songs about this for ages. Why are you listening to Taylor swift?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 04:48 PM
0

I think a woman dressed in any way goes into a frat house full of drunk young college men is looking for trouble, and any man that attempts to rape her is a piece of shit. Use your imagination and reverse the sexes to a similar scenario, my opinion stays the same. I hold everyone to the same standard, I'm not sexist. Yes, I'm aware that people may call that, to some degree, victim shaming, we used to call it common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 12:25 AM
-1

I'm going to be honest with you, I've never encountered any rape culture outside of Reddit, I don't pay attention to feminist movements or mra, any of it, it's a crock of crap. These people sit and whine "My rights! Oppression!" Boo fucking hoo, grow up. I've witnessed none of it in the real world. When the facts are laid bare, no cherry picking is done most legal decisions makes sense. As public opinion becomes involved and we allow it, things get ugly. Back to Roosh. That dumb ass traveled to …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 11:42 PM
1

Then he needs to travel to the usa where anyone can sue the hell out of anyone for anything
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 11:11 PM
-1

If you grope women don't be shocked if they lash out, and if women dress scantily, they shouldn't be surprised if they're groped? Don't you think it's misandry to think men don't have the agency to control themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 10:31 PM
-1

Physically violating a woman, (or man for that matter) is not comparable to a drink being splashed on someone. I'll agree that spilling a drink is not acceptable, and that if you're not a douche you're less likely to suffer the consequences of acting like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 09:04 PM
1

+/u/user_simulator /u/setsfires
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 02:12 PM
6

That's hilarious, where's the mars symbol?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:31 PM
4

Christ on a cracker! You get to be excluded, you special snowflake, you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 03:33 AM
15

No, and that goes for anyone who announces they identify as a cis-male.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 02:44 AM
0

Fake it until you make it- change what you can, fake what you can't. Does the saying have a different meaning to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:50 AM
0

Personality, clothes, what can be changed about her physical appearance, to list a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:17 AM
4

As am I. I'm saying there are women with the same issues as redpillers. If they (women) only need to lower their standards, why don't rpers do the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:00 AM
4

Yet, these guys still need trp. It's that simple for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 11:48 PM
5

That's the point. RP is sexual strategy for men who don't know how to be fuckable, "low smv", without help. Why not have a version to teach low smv women tactics as well? Trp has the dark triad, low value women surely could use some advice to become, what are they called, Lucifer's daughters?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 11:41 PM
4

Perhaps a girl game for women who don't look Fuckable?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 09:14 PM
1

Should I care of my number is higher than hers? Depends on the woman
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 04:45 PM
5

Therefore, the typical RP person will come to PPD, throw something out there that's been argued on here multiple times for months Where as BPers, at least some like myself, are waiting to have our views sufficiently challenged or altered. Personally, it has occurred, but it will not be by someone like you because you won't be here in a month. There we go. This is my experience as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 03:44 AM
5

There used to be quite a few bp/non-rp here. After awhile the strawmen, loaded questions, and personal attacks get boring. The questions are the same crap rephrased over and over, too. Not to mention the lovely private messages when a terper disagrees with you and can't attack in the forum...although they are entertaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 12:10 AM
1

To be clear, I said: They're attempting to be alpha, when they're not alpha. When someone fakes being something, they're a fake. If they were natural leaders, would they be looking for this form of self-help? That is not to say that none are capable of becoming a leader, though given the information in that video and reading the thoughts and ideas in TRP, it's hard to believe that a red piller is going to put others before himself. TRP reads as "it's a dog eat dog world, watch your own ass, fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 12:14 AM
1

Let's get this straight, I respond, you insult and act like you don't know what I'm saying, this continues, you ask a question, I answer. You throw another insult. Who has the problem understanding the debate here? Looking through your post history shows this is an ongoing problem. You might want to consider why that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:34 PM
1

What is the correct terminology then? You keep on going back and forth between debating a fake alpha and a real alpha, let me know when you decide which one you want to debate. Jeebus... I meant, I call people what they are, you asked what is the correct terminology. Again, you asked, I answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 08:42 PM
1

Right now we are working on figuring out common ground, once we can do that then we can debate a thing. I was pretty sure you were going to say they were born not made and then I was going to link this video but if you dont believe that then the video is worthless. Hence why we start with common ground first. What are the cliff notes for that video? Out of morbid curiosity I'll have to watch it later. What is the correct terminology then? I call it what it is- rich, unattractive, and not a good …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 01:29 PM
1

If you agree that being an Alpha exists then let me ask you this question, are Alphas born or made? Some people are more confident, better leaders, etc., than others. All varying by degrees. The word alpha is not used correctly by these subs, though we do have social hierarchy. You beat around the bush to ask what you really want to ask in order to prove your point. Which is, what?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:10 AM
3

"Fake alpha" is the definition of red pill. Your comments do not make a lot of sense since fake alpha is a term used in TRP. Are you trying to say that all the men in TRP are take alphas? More trolls since I've been here last. Holy hell. They're attempting to be alpha, when they're not alpha. When someone fakes being something, they're a fake. I'm not using trp speak any more than absolutely necessary. What doesn't make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 03:09 AM
1

Use your words and write in full sentences, it's fun! Said the pot to the kettle. Oh all right, let's be petty! We ought to expect nothing less from ppd. Now, for the sake of clarity, because that wasn't obvious enough for you: "Fake alpha" is the definition of red pill. Therefore, Donald Trump is rp. Now, do you have an actual rebuttal, or only more bs?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 02:14 AM
-1

Trump is a fake alpha. Definition of RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 11:21 PM
1

I don't think there is a connection, aside from that both types break down interactions, explore the inner workings of things (which explains why they're attracted to TRP if anything), and that I = introverted, and some introverts have more trouble with social interaction than extroverts. Some of both types were renowned leaders, and if these types of people are sigmas then TRP is putting too much stock in being "alpha", but that's just my opinion. Here's a list of INTJ people and INTP people
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 04:50 PM
1

I can't assume an average, there's probably a diversity of ethnicities, shapes, and sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 12:48 AM
2

Some of us are weirdos who enjoy being analytical. I admire your honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 04:15 PM
2

Arguing realities is a fun pastime.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 04:15 PM
1

I'm agreeing, but I'm also saying that stereotypes only go so far. Also, predicting (worrying about) what will happen next will suck the life out of a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:47 PM
1

This was my thinking. I was trying see if people who ID themselves as neither red, blue, nor purple (somewhere inbetween) actually had a belief that isn't covered by those views. Some people here have hinted that that is the case, but haven't actually offered any evidence of it. It's the connotations that go with the labels, some pp don't want to be seen as rp, (you know what rides with identifying as rp), same goes for bp, especially since it's not a philosophy but a satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:27 PM
1

A common BP trope is the idea that people and relationships are so varied that you can't possibly make any predictions about them, so just wing it and see how it goes. You can't predict even with stereotypes, only a general idea but people are usually gender biased whether they admit it or not. Not analyzing everything is not winging it. The amount you'll get hurt if a relationship goes to hell is the amount you allow yourself to have feelings. I'm not building a wall out of fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:13 PM
1

But, between all pills, basically every possible relative view of relationships is covered. Even if someone has never come across these subs, they'll more or less fit somewhere on the spectrum. In which case, yes, you're correct, even a non pill is somewhere on the line, and don't label themselves for whatever reason, for simplicity, or there's no aspect of any particular pill they can fully identify with, but will lean one way. If they agree with all of them evenly, they're contradicting themse…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 02:26 PM
1

Things in the relationship go well or I'm out. I don't believe in soulmates/the one, unicorns, or marriage. Someone who dgaf, where does that fall? I'm guessing bp, because rp gives many fucks. If we're looking at a continuum as you're seeing it, bp to rp, everyone is on it, not rp= bp or pp, there aren't any outliers. Correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 01:50 PM
1

They do, I don't need/have a strategy. I don't use any of the tactics. There's no point, the endgame is the same if two people aren't compatible, why push a relationship that requires that type of work? I agree with some of rp, don't stick with someone who shits on you, don't be a doormat, I don't believe "just be yourself" and wouldn't give that advice. I see the things trp talks about, but it's combined with too much that isn't true to validate it. I agree with bp, which is almost everyone tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 12:53 PM
1

Let's see, I'm no pill, bp for sake of argument, (though guilty of laughing at extreme and weird rps), not a feminist or sjw. We'll say I'm libertarian. I have no agenda, only curiosity. My theory is ...sure. Personal philosophy borders on nihilism, but not entirely. How does that translate?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 05:23 AM
3

It doesn't have to be and isn't always a circle jerk. This sub could be better if the users here at least attempt to talk to each other as people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 04:42 PM
3

...and you, too, but first we'll need truth serum :P
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/15 02:29 AM
1

Lab
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 10:34 PM
-1

You're getting there
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 09:34 PM
0

Scroll up some more and read down
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 09:20 PM
7

Alpha as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 02:54 PM
2

I used dread. She was all gimme some of dat sammich ....please ...please I'm all hell no, dreading her and shit Bitches don't get table scraps, good bitches don't beg. Go lay down! (Which, of course, she did) She shit tests me occasionally, but overall she's well behaved and worth keeping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 02:04 PM
3

What country?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 05:49 AM
1

There's nothing there?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:56 AM
6

Does that go both ways? Say the wife gets a strap on...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 03:06 AM
3

How many actually responded? I didn't, mark me down for the revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 11:32 PM
0

It goes both ways, this post is baseline, expanded on far enough in either direction and that's where the disagreement starts. Not to mention that not all rpers will necessarily agree on one thing, same goes for bpers/non-rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 11:23 PM
1

No, trp isn't responsible for either of them. It was their choice to join the hive. Weak minded sheeple, that's all. Go buy some rp books by your founding fathers, keep it alive, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 07:21 PM
2

Lmao you want proof of forums that went out of existence? Try theredpill.net check the date last modified, hint, it's 2011. Redpill's ugly history started before you knew about it, that's not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 12:45 PM
3

Keep believing whatever makes you feel okay with yourself ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 06:48 PM
3

Lots of butt hurt in this thread. Ahhh the truth ! No not the truth! Anything but the truth!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 06:46 PM
3

Actually it's entertaining that you guys find it so hard to believe this was a thing before the Reddit trp. Go look at player/game blogs, dig up the defunct forums, plenty have been around for awhile, the "mysandry bubble" and a few other things similar were written in 2010, or did they date them before they were written?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 01:28 PM
0

They were wannabes
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 01:05 PM
1

Ahhh no. Definitely no, he was in no way an anti Semite, and no more conspiracy theory than trp. Mrafay said he's been reading this stuff for years, too. Shall we ask him about his tinfoil hat? I'm still wondering what's bothering you guys about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 05:00 AM
2

They sound almost identical in behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 03:49 AM
3

None of those, I'm almost positive it was a forum named redpill or theredpill. He made matrix references. This shit isn't that new to the net.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 03:43 AM
1

What age group is this guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 01:42 AM
2

On Reddit perhaps, but forums and blogs have been around for awhile. The Matrix came out in what? 99? I have to ask, what's bothering you about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 01:09 AM
2

so you knew these guys were commenting on /r/theredpill? This is kinda strange. I've honestly not let a soul know and I've been reading various blogs and books(not the sub tho) for years. I think TRP really emphasizes suiting your audience. Very few people carry over their behaviour from /r/TheRedPill even to other subreddits, much less real life. He acted like a missionary, this was also years ago, not only trp but different blogs. It didn't mean much at the time, I wasn't using Reddit yet, nev…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 09:57 PM
11

I've known two, (past tense, purged out of out social circle) One was a decent looking guy, not what some people might think as a stereotypical red piller, taller (about 6'), physically fit, no issues attracting women,only trouble keeping them. Before trp he was a fun guy, easy going, after he became paranoidish, sexist, and managed to screw up his life. Mra/trp became his persona, that's what he talked about, the latest way some woman fucked over a man, how not to blah blah blah,AWALT! The othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 08:32 PM
4

That's funny... goofy looking monkey mouthed mf, no wonder he's mgtow.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 10:50 PM
2

Interesting question, never entertained the idea, my first thought is nope. But meh,unless the situation presents itself it's difficult to say one way or another with certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 10:05 PM
1

The person's words who use ideology, but yeah, that's another way to phrase it. The ideas didn't invent themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 08:54 PM
1

This is where we could argue endlessly. You have the right to say and think as you please. The concern is where words and actions hurt others. You can say "well it's all true" or "I don't believe all of that" It becomes subjective at the individual basis. It's when trp is viewed as a collective, it's ugly and full of hate. Young minds forming opinions about a entire gender... we've seen what generalizations made by large groups are capable of. Thankfully trp is relatively small.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 07:24 PM
1

On the post title: Some could argue loaded question, because using the terms implies the premise behind the terminology is true, whether you agree or not, but to debate here often requires allowing at least one faulty premise. Or it's a matter of tomato/tomahto, depending on who you're talking to. To disprove generalities is a comparable to attempting to prove a god doesn't exist to religious people lack of evidence = proof Smallest amount of (perceived) confirmation = proof :. everything is pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/15 06:23 PM
2

A lot of good advice and common sense Firstly, I want to dispel the gimmicks and novelty advice that gets thrown around when people talk about confidence. These things can't be said enough, you can't fake substance
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/15 11:15 PM
3

Great idea. Though a thread with only studies/articles with the links, a short explanation, and tag (trp/bp/pp), otherwise no comments to keep it uncluttered, specifically state no arguing, or we'll have to dig.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 03:47 AM
3

I don't understand the lying part. Who lied to you so much that made you so damn angry? Disney? They are cartoons. You're not supposed to take them seriously. Your parents? They think the sun shines out of your ass so their advice is going to be shit. Society? No, sorry, the world isn't going to be handed to you on a silver platter. I have the same question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 12:07 AM
5

Do you think more women would explore same sex relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 11:02 PM
3

No that was so your future arguments aren't immediately dismissed. How many trps start their comments with "oh leave it to a blooper..."? We arn't oblivious to some of the ideals held here, so when a statement like that is made it only is used against the person who said it, as you can see.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 02:22 AM
3

I agree with you here. I've noticed different levels of rp, (moot point here, maybe another ppd post). I'd add it's the generalizations that are problematic, women this, men that, bpers this, trpers that. What we're doing is taking the worst examples of each and using those as "case in point". The atmosphere of us vs them is ugly and separates instead of seeing the gray areas that serve to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 12:22 AM
1

Just a reminder that /u/sh1v advocates... study and memorize all of these
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:57 PM
0

Let me help you with the example given above. Hitler says the sky looks blue. Let's not forget Hitler was a pile of shit. It comes across as "we need to question/dismiss Hitler's statement about the sky, because he's a pile of shit" Using the character of the op against him in an argument is an ad hominem. Don't do that, it sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:35 PM
6

BPs believe anyone acting in their own self-interest means narcissism necessarily. Nope. It's healthy to look out for your self interests (to a degree) Narcissism is when a mental health professional diagnosis' someone with it. Typically it involves destroying every relationship this person has entered in to.... There's a continuum, though it tends to take someone destroying nearly every relationship before they'll get help, if not discovered earlier
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/15 05:13 AM
2

Right, that's what I mean, I can do either, but not blocking co feeling could make a person into a nut job. It's interesting because I get accused of being cold and stoic, so I'm wondering what all of you are like that have lower numbers. Edit: wait, you can't feel something that someone else is feeling? For example, someone is happy/sad, you don't feel it too, or get a twinge of pain when you see someone else get hurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 10:40 PM
1

Of course they do. That's how I am, calm in stressful situations, but my clients need me to be able to "read them". It becomes something you hone in on and use to their and your advantage. You can co-feel things, but learn to block it out when it gets in the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 09:45 PM
1

Yep, had to use a computer
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 02:38 PM
3

More like a luggage key, it works on just about every cheap bag, albeit not well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 02:54 PM
2

I'd have to argue that if a person comes from a poor background it's likely they've had to work their ass off to get into college (work before or while attending), where well off people sometimes get their education handed to them. However, they'll both have to do the same amount of school work to graduate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 01:57 PM
13

There's a quote from J R R Martin I really like. Though I should probably point out that I realy like it only under specific circumstances. Said circumstances being, whenever it's reposted on reddit, imgur, facebook, or any other virtual form of circlejerk as an example of equality. Because that's just so perfectly ironic as to be delicious. So we're going to do the same circle jerk? Why is it ironic? Because people are, by nature, selfish egotists. So when you make the claim that "women are peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/15 01:37 PM
2

Welp, this one takes all It's time for feminism to reverse course and bring all unwed women into agreement: No more sex until marriage, or you'll be wrecked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 04:15 PM
2

rimshot
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:52 PM
2

Aww really? I'd marry HHL 1 lots of good angry sex 2 rarely agree with her but she's hilarious 3 older women got it going on
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:33 PM
4

It goes both ways in a lot of research/studies They imply both promiscuous men and women will have or have issues. Question is whether they already have an underlying problem or if it's caused by high partner counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:40 AM
9

http://m.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201304/the-lingering-psychological-effects-multiple-sex-partners You have to know the key words
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:10 AM
4

Or the problem of correlation vs causation
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 03:10 AM
2

Damn good book and movie, there's something we can all agree on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 02:26 AM
2

People questioned the Millerites sanity, now look at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 02:20 AM
0

Sorry *most likely possibility. Although her user name indicates she isn't hitting the wall anytime soon, according to trp
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 01:19 AM
14

He thinks you rode the cc, hit "the wall", and found bb. Because, to them, that's the only possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 12:59 AM
6

Cheaper than a movie and there's free coffee. Do yourself a favor and take this down.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 12:51 AM
1

What is gynocentrism? Explain as though this is a term that not everyone has heard before, and their phone doesn't do web searches without the browser closing. So, good sir, if you would care to expand?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 07:45 AM
12

Lie: You should be attentive, affectionate, caring and always emotionally available. That will make your girl love you. Agreed, that's not true. If you're forcing some idea of who you are to make her happy, you're not going to be happy for long. No one can always be all of these things. You're only human, and probably have a life outside of the relationship. Second, if you're decent to her, she'll love you only if she's a person who is willing to put up with you, and you her. It won't work on ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 06:52 AM
3

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 02:56 AM
6

The assumption of a transactional model of sex (a man "gets" sex from a woman) Thus, we end up with a "Sexual Marketplace," where men use status/money/muscles/blah blah to effectively purchase sex from women. This is something I'm curious about as well, assuming each premise is true, (yes, we can argue until the cows come home) I've asked this before, didn't get an answer: If a man's smv increases for each woman, but her value decreases as her partner count goes up, isn't it somewhat understanda…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 02:43 AM
1

TheBluePill, being feminist, is against love. It's all about being stingy with love, being selfish, tamping down a woman's natural motivations to help others, to serve the ones they love. TheBluePill is pretty consistent - they are pro-divorce, pro-breakup, pro-promiscuity. For a man to do anything to save his relationship is "abuse" according to the blue pill. Blue Pillers are malicious people, they know that the kind of advice they give people will lead to heartarche, broken families, and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 04:32 PM
2

It's fine when a woman is a player. If a woman seduces a man, if a woman just uses a man for sex - that's a-ok. How dare you judge a woman's sexuality! I don't agree, it's scummy behavior regardless of the sex. But when men do it, it's "abuse" "misogyny" etc. It's not the playing that is misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 04:20 PM
0

That is a judgement on my having one night stands and nothing to do with the accuracy of red pill theory or lack thereof. By bringing in moral judgements you make the argument subjective and that is why you lose it. No, that's a word of caution against not having high enough standards, why they're important to have. I'm giving you solid advice, without judging your morals or shaming you- I'm saying, look the fuck out dude, you're doing it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 04:12 PM
0

What is your subversion to manipulation? Every advert you see or hear is manipulation but there is no call to ban adverts. Ban? That would be great, but off topic. A ban on trp isn't necessary either, if you guys straighten out the guys you described, who are making it look particularly scummy. Sone of these dudes need a little help, it's their attitudes that are concerning. A girl waiting for the 3rd date to have sex to build an emotional connection with the man that leads to his commitment is …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/15 04:05 PM
1

What I look for in a one night stand is not the same as what I'd look for in a long-term relationship. I get that, but you're going to end up with a bastard child, STDs, a crazy chick, or possibly all three. It's the mentally unbalanced ons/fwb that'll fuck you over. Didn't your daddy teach you anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 10:29 PM
1

You claim to know many aspects of RP and say you would use them because you knew about them before the RP come along. I wouldn't* use them. This crap isn't new. Trpers are putting a new spin on being a player, only disgustingly more so of one. What if you knew about Dread Game, simply keeping your options open enough to give your partner a feeling they have to work a bit for you. Very attractive girls have constant dread game, the guy knows that she will be hit on constantly by guys far hotter t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 10:22 PM
1

I'm explaining to you that one person's manipulaiton is another persons "straightforward and proper communication" - the label is subjective. Sure Nor mine for a long-term relationship but for a one-night stand why would I give a damn about the other parties emotional intelligence? Standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 10:05 PM
1

You're rationalizing manipulation. We're going to have to agree to disagree. I believe in being straightforward and proper communication, it works wonders. Anyone not emotionally intelligent enough to practice this isn't my cup of tea.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 07:35 PM
1

Good point, I'm surprised you care. An enigma wrapped in a conundrum lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 07:26 PM
1

The improve yourself bit, or use manipulation bit? If manipulation works, I can safely assume the person isn't my type, in which case, fuck that, I'm out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 05:51 PM
1

It is interesting, but as predicted for the most part. Dang, someone should, this stuff is a psychologist's or sociologist's wet dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 05:38 PM
1

I really hoped you'd answer this one. Would you do an AMA? I'm serious, you're a fascinating individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 05:25 PM
1

do you have people (friends, significant other, family) in your life that you consider close? Of course. are the feelings and welfare of those people that you consider close to you more important, as important, or less important to you than your feelings/welfare? Equally important, for myself, and because a lot of people rely on me, but they're no less important. do you think the people you consider close to you consider your feelings and welfare more important, as important, or less important t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 05:19 PM
2

We're (non rpers) not oblivious to everything. You'll find that many do the same things as trpers, have fwb, are aware of their sexual attractiveness, will go extra lengths to save a relationship, or quickly get out of one. Using trp to save a relationship is only going to end up in disaster... it would be faster and less painful to shoot the dying animal than to use trp methods. I think you'll see that relationships that involve trp are almost all eventually doomed, but only time will tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 04:47 PM
3

Right, somewhat, it's a little more complex. Women and their property, (inheritance, dowry, trust fund) belonged to the husband after marriage. The girl's family had a lot of say in the suitor for that reason, but it was up to her to pursue the man (through a female relative) to advance the "relationship" (financial transaction) So in answering OP if women asked men, this may or may not be an example he was looking for. Men didn't exactly get to sit back passively and hope to be picked, although…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 06:49 AM
1

Found it, you can find it in google books, "Emerging Aduthood: the winding road from the late teens through the twenties." Page 84, a young man would call on a girl at her invitation. His choice, but she invited I'd link you, but my phone isn't cooperating
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 02:44 AM
0

Really? Swore it was the other way, but I can't find anything on the web.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 02:24 AM
11

The island of Flickapoo! Men rule, but there are so few men, most women are virgins into old age. Only teenage girls who are the most sexually attractive get to choose their life mate in an annual ceremony. The less attractive women are sent off to work in mines, be nannies, or all the other work. After marriage the women may choose another woman (with the man's permission) to join their family to guarantee large amounts of offspring, or at least one boy. Must be something in the water, it's abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 01:56 AM
5

(Earlier) America, the woman would call upon the man she wanted to court (marry). They would have dates in the woman's family home. From a sociology textbook, sorry, can't remember the exact name.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/14 01:27 AM
2

What is straw feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 09:39 PM
3

Holy shit, I'm agreeing with you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:38 PM
1

Misandry is any better?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:35 PM
1

All men aren't rapists, why do you think that? And why would you want to bring a girl into a world full if rapists, if that's true? Or is this sarcasm? It doesn't translate well over the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 07:07 PM
4

You don't really believe that, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 06:42 PM
3

Life isn't a Disney fairytale, people you love will fuck you over, leave, cheat, etc. It helps to be born with good genetics and a silver spoon, and even then life will still hand you shit. We're not likely to hit any jackpot, we're not going to be rich and famous, we're not guaranteed a happy fulfilling life, and so on. These things are common sense, and a part of real life. The best way to handle that knowledge is to do the best you can, treat people well, and not be a whiney little bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 02:12 AM
2

Tbp meaning life as it is, or in the matrix? As it is, it's not always perfect, occasionally far from it, but it's good. TRP reads like bad dystopian literature, nothing in reality is so black and white, nor should it be.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 07:46 PM
9

How do you know that is not how they act in their sex lives with their husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:37 PM
8

Nothing would compel me to believe a woman's version of her husband's experience of their sex life. Not the voice of God from heaven even. They talk about it, and so do their husbands. surveys are nonsense Why do you ask when you're already so sure? You don't trust any research, only your perception is true? How do you know that is not how they act in their sex lives with their husbands? You didn't answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 09:30 PM
7

They talk about it, and so do their husbands. Of course they have their ups and downs, I'm not denying that. Because this is anecdotal: http://www.sexscience.org/dashboard/articleImages/SSSS-SexualSatisfactionInCommittedRelationships.pdf How do you know that is not how they act in their sex lives with their husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 08:53 PM
2

What I think you'll find (if you haven't) is the hatred for women comes from their environment, lack of good male role models, and some psychological issues. I've never given Freud much credit, but I'd have to say they're exactly what he had in mind with the Madonna-whore complex. We have a large portion of a generation of young men who will cling to this "philosophy". I admire your attempt though, maybe some will understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:57 PM
5

Yes, quite a few, many are married or in relationships. I've come across a few women as described in trp, but they're in the minority, and not the kind of people within my social circle. If that's all they encounter, I can't completely blame them for their world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:46 PM
3

May I ask how much you've read in these subs? I'm not necessarily disputing you, but that almost everything trp attempts to achieve is attempted in a psychologically damaging way. Read some of their posts that pretty much explain their ideal society. Trp is their response to perceived effects of feminism. So why would they make it less misogynistic when that's why they go along with it? Tl;dr: misogyny is the essence of trp, how can they separate it as long as it's ingrained in their thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:35 PM
5

This ties in well with this http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2pklf6/both_pills_need_to_learn_the_scientific_concept/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 05:39 PM
1

Red pill women have the characteristics of being "beta"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/14 06:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter