TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

severus66 Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by severus66 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

My take: Girls are seeing you as a friend, not a sexual threat. This can be due to a combination of things. Your look, your personality/ attitude, and your tactics (sidling up to fuck girls through the 'friendzone' is a terrible strategy). I'm not sure how large your university is. This can slightly matter in terms of shitting where you eat (playing grabass on your own social circle, classes, or dorms, etc). Anyway, fuck hitting on your social circle at this point, unless it's a friend of a frie…
/r/seduction05/01/18 07:57 PM
1

Hey the guy said some people couldn't tell his accent was Australian. That's not calling out you, it's calling out whatever presumably idiots he met. Voting for Trump doesn't fix any of the baggage you mentioned. Unless you want American to implode, in that case, well done I suppose.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 04:57 PM
3

I spent some time in Melbourne and I can definitely pick up the accent. No it wasn't crocodile dundee but it was pretty clearly Australia. I mean it's hard to pick it out vs. a Kiwi but definitely not vs. a Brit or something. There are many Americans who seldom travel and have shit for brains though, so yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if some people thought you were French.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 10:39 PM
2

Not true. Ronaldo would get laid DESPITE this poor game. But it's still poor game. Don't sound like a desperate thirsty chode, which was the text here. He got a little bit of boobage (someone who fucks pretty frequently would be intrigued, but not like oh my! I struck gold!! yay!!) and suddenly he's like ... we fuck now?!! now?!! tomorrow! Jesus, sounds like he's waay hard up for ass (dry spell), and is not very busy either (two things you don't want to convey, even if true). If you wanted to at…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 08:02 PM
4

meh, the jokes were meh, but after you make a girl cum a few times, you can pretty much tell her anything and she'll accept it. (unless you become a hen-pecked "borefriend" after a few months). Also, I thought everyone said cunt in Australia. yeah but you're right in the analysis; this guy came off as super thirsty/ desperate/ dry spell, even if that wasn't his reality
/r/TheRedPill04/01/18 07:52 PM
0

I'm a man, and wouldn't go on a date to 'make meals for the homeless' -- do you're preachy good deeds on your own fuckin time.
/r/seduction20/05/14 01:03 AM
4

Not to offend, but they might be able to. When I actually was a virgin, a couple people DID ask me. Which was offensive, by the way. Why would you ask a dude that? In that case, though, it was because I tried fingering a girl, like a retard, and had no idea what I was doing --- and she probably told her friends. So there was more evidence than me just walking around. That being said, I knew some guys in college (and I was a social retard in college as well, and still have social tics I'm sure...…
/r/seduction20/05/14 12:51 AM
2

Well idioms like this have a very specific meaning. You can invent your own meaning just like you can invent the definition of "apple" to refer to banana, but no one will know what the fuck you are talking about. The phrase "some dude is tired of fucking her" -- means some DUDE is tired of her shit ... meaning take her off the pedestal. It doesn't mean 'There's still a chance! She hates her boyfriend!' .. who says every hot girl has a boyfriend? who says every hot girl hates her boyfriend? Your …
/r/seduction20/05/14 12:41 AM
1

I hire people based on how much money I think they can make me, which usually is mostly accounted for by their skills and experience on their resume. If the job calls for advanced social skills, then maybe I'll take that into account. Otherwise, I don't care if they fidget, fuck up some unwritten rules about touching their hair, or have huge bazoombas.
/r/seduction19/05/14 03:57 AM
0

Nah that's way off. It means you're looking at her beauty alone, thinking it's the greatest thing in the world/ answer to all your problems just to lay pipe in her. But once you start fucking her for a while, the 'looks' factor become commonplace, just like anything in the world -- driving a Lambo ... being wealthy... it all, certainly, becomes the new normal after a while. But with the hot chick, you probably overrated the whole experience, and she'll become bitchy/ "work" to deal with after a …
/r/seduction19/05/14 03:51 AM
0

Good read of the basics I suppose. I disagree with man's sex drive dwarfing a woman's. That's not true IME. It just appears that way because women generally have higher standards and huge cultural expectations, but in terms of wanting to go to pound town, it varies person to person. Some women have low sex drives -- some, extremely high. Ditto for men.
/r/seduction25/01/14 05:13 AM
0

One example of baiting. Christ, I guess you've never heard of an analogy before, mr. literal? I'm glad this kid got fucked with. Life lesson. It'll happen to you too. Have fun fighting nutbags.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:12 AM
-1

If you control for income levels, ie poverty, the disparity will damn near vanish. We do have a poverty problem in this country. The conversation is had repeatedly. Republicans have no interest in solving it. By shrouding the issue in racist implications, you are merely creating a huge shit storm out of ignorance, stupidity, or intentional trolling. But by all means, put that question on Twitter. You should definitely do that. Then you can stand up for free speech again. Oh, right, you won't pos…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:15 AM
-3

That's like me saying on twitter "Did you know blacks and Hispanics in America commit more crimes per person than whites?" It's technically true, and based on economic factors primarily -- but it's opening up a huge can of worms. Moreover, there's almost no reason to bring up this statement, other than to bait people into getting into an argument because I love attention. This kid maybe learned a lesson about dealing with crazies. If he hasn't, by all means, spend your life exchanging insults wi…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:39 PM
-5

Well, humans are very predictable -- all humans. They give predictable responses. And bees have less rights than humans -- virtually no rights. You can instantly convict and execute them for harassing you. However, I still wouldn't kick a beehive. You may be morally right but meh. And what exactly did he prove? That rape is sometimes nonviolent? Of course that's accurate. They started quibbling over nothing ---just baseless ego -- after a while. Personally, I don't get into arguments with every …
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:14 PM
-7

Next up, start a screaming match with the NRA about gun control. You'll get a lot accomplished.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 10:34 PM
-14

Well you can kick a beehive and cite legal doctrine at the bees, or you can decide it's not worth the headache. I pick option two usually - many may pick option 1.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 10:06 PM
-23

Yes. You also have the right to kick a beehive. Don't be surprised at the results.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:19 PM
-28

I agree that not all rapes are violent by why the hell would a man say that on twitter? That's just begging to cause a shit storm.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:02 PM
1

Why would you tell a stranger to hold your drink? What's next, your purse? That's whipped boyfriend behavior, and not even polite, frankly, to ask a stranger or a guy you recently met.
/r/seduction26/12/11 03:08 PM
0

Why are you all pissed about boycotting sex? It doesn't make sense... If she stops having sex, then she stops getting dick. She's fucking herself over. Literally, haha. Also, all of my relationships are based around sex. If the sex stops coming, then we're done. No sex = we're no longer in a relationship. I think girls know this, so they don't try it unless they know you are a pussy-whipped, desperate man who can't find a replacement easily. But again, it's like the man boycotting sex from the w…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 07:25 PM
1

This must suck for you people to hate Valentine's Day, a basically made-up bullshit holiday. My last valentine's day? My girl didn't expect anything, other than maybe getting fucked. I was at Target that day with a friend, so I strolled into the pink Love Day aisle, picked up a $3 stuffed bear that looked amusing and a $3 box of candy. My two best guy friends (in committed relationships) and I all went to some asian restaurant, sans girlfriends, ate some vegetable shit while laughing at the pink…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 07:08 PM
1

stfu
/r/MensRights09/02/11 03:23 PM
1

stfu
/r/MensRights07/02/11 02:33 PM
2

You're a meme pro! Here's a million internet points! Get laid, you pussy shit. Maybe you'll like women better. _^
/r/MensRights05/02/11 09:31 PM
1

Find your balls, you misogynist. You're a disgrace to the male gender. You wouldn't argue your position in public, because you'd be an embarrassment to rational, normal people. Now shut the fuck up and let the big boys talk.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 04:40 PM
1

If the girl gives the child to the government it end the financial responsibility of the male as well. In ALL SITUATIONS, either both are paying or none are paying. Got that, ya smartass? This men's rights board is a bunch of flapping pussies. I've never seen such pathetic, sorry excuses for "men." If you're being financially screwed, systematically, FINE, address it. If you are being discriminated against for your gender, for something that fucking matters, FINE, address it. But you're not even…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 03:08 AM
0

It makes him a bad father period. Okay, you fat ugly misogynistic virgin? Get fucked, ya loser
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:59 AM
0

You obviously know very little about the law. Please, stop embarrassing yourself. What "investigation" or possible evidence is going to conclude that one person knows the age of another person? Hearsay? What's going to motivate anybody to ask or ascertain the age of another person, if that knowledge is simply a legal liability? What is going to motivate a minor to tell an attractive companion her age, if she knows knowledge is only a legal liability? How is anybody going to fucking know what you…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 02:51 AM
0

Riddle me this, Einstein. Statutory rape is basically sex with a minor, where the minor agrees and wants to have sex with you (though legally cannot give consent). With your "I didn't know her age" defense on the market, what's preventing anyone from carrying on a relationship with a doting minor? The honor system? Good 'ole honesty? BWA HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAH. Now quiet. Oh, and go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 10:13 PM
0

Who knows how they got in the bar/ past the bartender. Two crimes do not make a right. Also, no, intent does not matter. You can speed without intent to speed. Let this idiocracy downvote me, the books are like that in all 50 states, for girls and bars, for good reason. A radical pedophile like you will not change it. Ever. So I'll be laughing. And I am. Ha hah aha
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:03 PM
1

My "some cases" probably take issue more with the definition of statutory rape than anything else. If a guy is 17 and fully understands his actions, then he is responsible. But I guess that's a separate issue and doesn't make sense given our current laws.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:28 PM
1

Well, if a man's sperm is acquired from the trash-can, or what have you, he should not have to be responsible for the child. I agree with you there. It might be exceedingly difficult to prove in court, but if it is, he should be let off. But, I don't have a problem with the fact that in most cases of a baby popping out (and in most cases it was consensual intercourse) -- that the noncustodial party (which is usually the man) must help share the costs of the baby. As for deciding for the abortion…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:24 PM
0

Wow, no one responded to the fact, then when a baby is made, BOTH genders of parent pay for the baby. How is that unfair? You gutless cowards just downvote without even coming up with an argument, like Glenn Beck and his cronies might. I'm a moderate person, and a man, and I support men's rights, but the idea that the "men" here must champion a cause involving whether the state should pay for abortions for "forcible" rape as opposed to "unconscious" rape and other nonsense (is there a qualitativ…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:15 PM
-1

Why don't you have a seat over there.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:02 PM
-7

You don't need to set up a "strawman" when the initial argument is made of hot butter and you are wielding a katana. My example is the precise reason "duh uh, officer, she looked 18, I swear!" is not a valid legal defense for fucking a minor. Nor will it ever be. Now get the fuck out, the adults are talking.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 05:26 AM
-7

Should I give a 10 year old a pokemon, rape her, then give her a fake ID saying she's 18? There's a reason that you, BioTube, aren't writing the laws. You are incredibly stupid. Funnier yet? That law will NEVER change, for good reason, so SUCK IT. NO FUCKING TODDLERS, OKAY? ILLEGAL. Doesn't matter how old you thought they were.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 04:09 AM
5

Yeah and I agreed with you there. But not with jumpup's assertion that the boy should decide whether the baby is aborted.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 04:05 AM
1

Actually in most, if not all, states --- an 18 year old having sex with a 17.9999 year old is perfectly legal. Most states' age of consent is 16 or 17, sometimes lower. And many, many states actually have clauses that make it legal for people to have sex with each other if they are within 1 or 2 years of each other (because of high school romps). It gets complicated after 2 years, though. 16 year old and 18 year old can be a problem in some states (though might be rare). Once you get 19, 20, or …
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:13 AM
1

I think we should federally fund a new super research program, with researchers working round the clock. The goal? A new super condom that actually makes sex more enjoyable. Maybe then we'll have less accident babies. I'm serious - I mean you said it yourself, unless its aborted, SOMEONE has to pay for the baby.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:09 AM
9

Jon Stewart made an interesting remark on this the other night (sorry if you are not liberal, reader). People complain about publicly funded abortions -as if that federal spending gets special attention. But what about the War in Iraq? I'm morally opposed to all war - including Iraq and Afghanistan. However, my tax dollars fund the war - the war is publicly funded. So what? That's democracy - an individual has to make compromises - deal with it. My tax-dollars are funding death and crime as well…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:05 AM
3

Actually, you may be twisting words here. In older woman/ younger man scenario, baby kept, both the woman and the man would be paying for the baby. In older man/ younger woman, baby kept, both the woman and the man would be paying for the baby. I guess you are saying that is unfair, because usually the woman gets custody, so the man has to pay by check instead of by buying food and diapers at the store? Well, I might agree with you there, that the biased custody is unfair. But getting financiall…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:01 AM
1

So you're saying a 12 year old boy should have the final say on what surgical procedures should happen to a grown woman, likely a stranger, and the baby she is carrying? Just trying to clarify here. Are you seriously suggesting that with a straight face? I'm just trying to understand your position here. Now should the boy provide child support? It's more complicated. In most cases probably not - in some cases maybe.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:50 AM
-7

No, I disagree. Ignorance of the person's age is not an excuse and can easily be abused. Then, a 16 or even 12 year old girl who wants to have sex with an older man (and the desire is not that unusual, although debatably perverse) might learn NOT to tell a man her age, or lie about it. Even if the man knows she younger, he won't ask her about it. Or they'll both make up a story (because they love each other) that she said she was 18. The same reasoning occurs in the bar scene. BARS are responsib…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:41 AM
-29

Yeah, and women can't walk around bare-chested in public. What the hell is this?! And where are men's goddamn pregnancy leave? If my wife gets pregnant I want my pregnancy leave!! And WHY THE HELL does the womens restroom have nearly TWICE the goddamn stalls as the mens room? TWICE AS MANY!! WHY!!!! WHY!!!!!!!! WHY!!!!!!!!! Whyyyyyyyyyyyy won't a woman touch me? God I'm so lonely... /s Note: in both cases, man and woman pay for the baby if kept. in both cases, the underage person does not pay fo…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:24 AM
4

Maybe you should explain why you feel this 25 year old woman committed a grave offense against this student? You think she traumatized him in any way? Manipulated or coerced him into sex? Like it or not, men and women are physically and biologically different. Period. Feminists, and other characters like you, don't like to hear that. I think men and women should have equal rights and be treated fairly and equally. BUT WOMEN USUALLY HAVE A VAGINA, AND MEN USUALLY HAVE A PENIS, AND THERE ARE A HOS…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:56 AM
1

There's a big difference between 13 and 16. Many states you can give consent at 16. Including IL, if your partners 18 or 19, I believe.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:34 AM
1

Except it wasn't "statutory rape" by the standards of 37 US states. And it was only "statutory" in the the state of IL by 1 year. And it was only at 17 in IL (or actually 16, depending on other person's age) ---- because an arbitrary point has to be drawn in the sand somewhere. Despite the fact that the physical and mental judgment of the guy might be equal to or greater than any number of 17 year olds who could legally bang this teacher. Also ignoring the fact that this student in all likelihoo…
/r/MensRights11/01/11 02:28 AM
1

First, she was a dance teacher. Second, you are saying if he passed her class, or was no longer in her class, he could THEN fuck her, because they no longer have a classroom relationship? Also, if a woman or man fucked another woman or man for financial benefits of benefits-outside-of-pure-pleasure, you say that is forbidden? Because gosh-darn, I don't think that ever happens in mainstream society.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 11:13 PM
4

Disagree. Everyone goes after college-aged girls or girls who look like them because they have a physical appearance we are biologically wired to go after. Now if you're going for younger than that it may be about power. Why did the dance teacher fuck this guy? Maybe she thought it was so wrong..... it felt sooo right.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 11:09 PM
2

First of all, she was simply his dance teacher, lol. Secondly, dance teachers fuck their clients all the time. Where have you been going for instruction?
/r/MensRights10/01/11 11:04 PM
0

This is true if he's fucking Teacher or some 15 year old classmate. Relevance? Oh, and he can avoid it: condoms.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:58 PM
1

The idea here is this: Hot George Cloony teacher has sex with 16 year old ---- he may have coerced or manipulated her into sex she didn't really want. She may have fully understood and wanted it - but no one will believe her. She is a pure, weak-minded girl! Hot female teacher fucks male student: ---- he definitely, definitely wanted it. And hell, what male wouldn't want to hit that? Who are the true sufferers in this case? Why, actually, underage females are the sufferers. They are seen as: Pre…
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:55 PM
1

Actually, law can vary based on gender. I can walk around freely at the beach completely bare-chested. Women cannot. ....However, I'll be the first to object to this misogynistic law!
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:42 PM
1

Well, technically it's statutory rape, depending on the age of consent laws of that state. I guess the idea is, an older person, with their advanced position of power and mental faculties, can manipulate or coerce a much younger (14-17) person into having sex with them, even consensually. Like putting peanut butter on your balls in front of the dog. However, in the case of a high school male fucking a clearly stunningly-attractive female teacher, there are different societal mores, fair or not. …
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:38 PM
2

I was expecting this. Was not disappointed.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:31 PM
1

I believe if you cum inside a woman, you are responsible for the child, if the child is not aborted. This is so elementary it's scary you don't get this. Now, if a woman is doing shit like pulling your condom outside the trash can when you leave and trying to impregnate yourself, I'd say she's batshit insane and a you are definitely not responsible legally. However, if that kid is yours, it's going to be very tough to prove that the woman got pregnant by pulling your condom out of a trashcan. VE…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:15 AM
0

Eh, I'm pro-choice but I hardly think this is a simple solution at all. You are pressuring a woman into an abortion she may not want. The man will not be "paying" for the baby, and maybe the woman can't afford to raise it on her own. And what if no one wants the baby, but you fail to have an abortion, and have the child anyway? Is no one responsible for it? No. Do you know who's responsible for feeding it? : YOU ARE. Now, slimy or cheap men have even more power. They can tell a woman they don't …
/r/MensRights16/12/10 03:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter