TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sgt_narkstick Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by sgt_narkstick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

A huge point that I find incredibly ironic: women CAN do something about their weight, a fat girl says something- they don't excercise and eat an unhealthy diet. Meanwhile, men CAN'T do anything about their height. It literally has NOTHING to do with who they are, yet men are called "shallow" for not liking overweight women.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:36 PM
1

lost all ability to fight Was their army disbanded? Were they completely out of weapons? Was there something preventing them from rebuilding? Without either a) an eternal American blockade preventing them from getting weapons or b) a formal surrender and dismantling of the army and heavy restrictions placed on the nation, the answer is no.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:12 AM
1

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surrender To me, it appears that until they surrender, they do not agree to stop fighting. Now granted, the US could defeat the Japanese navy and blockade the country, however, there is nothing saying that they will surrender due to this. Will they be able to attack? Not really. But this blockade you've described, which doesn't actually effect their ability to live, will not force a surrender, and could hypothetically continue forever. Would the US be ab…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:04 AM
1

Because you don't defeat an enemy nation in war until its army surrenders and you make some kind of treaty officially declaring an end to the war?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 08:04 PM
1

Plenty of food and no invasion? Yea that'll make a nation like Imperial Japan surrender.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:03 PM
1

So if the Americans were to not invade and just blockade the Japanese people and starve them? I'm not really seeing how this is that much better of an option than an atomic bomb but sure, you have a point I suppose.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:59 PM
1

I share your sentiment right back at you. America invades, the Japanese army/people decide "hey, we can't beat them conventionally" and decide "hey, you know what'll work here? A good old war of attrition." They go hide, sure, a lot of them die, but they keep fighting, killing, and dying. What am I not understanding? Is there some sort of physical law that restrained the Japanese to only fight a standard war? Was there something physically stopping them from going to do what I've described above…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:32 AM
1

The Soviets were winning in Manchuria because they had a huge land army. They had 11 amphibious ships to invade with. Who says Japan had to launch some huge counteroffensive (one that still wouldn't require boats, steel, or rubber)? They could easily go hide out and resort to guerrilla warfare. There aren't rules to war......
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:14 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_color-coded_war_plans#Rainbow_plans In the 1920's and 30's America had the framework for an invasion/war plan against almost every country at the time. America started "vaguely planning" to attack Germany in 1938. It took them 6 years to plan and successfully complete. Granted Japan was weaker at this point than Germany was, but Russia had a grand total of 11 landing craft, which had been given to them by America. The Soviets had an idea. It was miles a…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:30 PM
1

According to Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar, the Soviets had carefully drawn up detailed plans for the Far East invasions, except that the landing for Hokkaido "existed in detail" only in Stalin's mind and that it was "unlikely that Stalin had interests in taking Manchuria and even taking on Hokkaido. Even if he wanted to grab as much territory in Asia as possible, he was too much focused on establishing a blockhead in Europe more so than Asia." That's all I've found about the Soviet Union in…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:37 PM
7

Oh the Soviets were planning an invasion, well that's fair. I mean if the Soviets had a strategy in WWII, it was probably a solid strategy that would have barely cost any lives right? I mean if there's one thing the Soviets didn't do in WWII, it was sacrifice their soldiers in some stupid and poorly planned attack. Also, you know bullets aren't made of steel right? And neither were most of the traps that were set up to kill soldiers in Vietnam. Carved wood can kill people too.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:21 PM
3

I'm honestly surprised that, at least legally, all of them don't think its possible to accidentally rape someone. Drink too much, decide a girl looks hot, she's been drinking too, you let your guard down and have sex with her because you're a little too drunk to realize it- rape.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:17 AM
6

As the Donald Sterling thing has shown us, you can still ruin someone's company/business/public face by illegally recording them saying something about black people. Legally they will probably come back and ruin your life, but you'll ruin their business.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:48 AM
-1

Guys, I'm sorry but I just have to say this. Not more than 3 days ago there was a thread on here about how more boys are getting expelled because of zero tolerance and that since boys are more likely to exhibit the behavior that zero tolerance is targeting, it should be changed since it pulls boys away from school. I don't want to start a huge argument, and I know they're not the same thing (elementary aged boys having to much energy is different to girls choosing to wear revealing clothes, I ge…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 05:28 AM
2

How does pretending guns don't exist changing anything? "Oh man, I'm so pissed I'm going to shoot someone. Oh, wait, I was taught that making a gun shape with my hand is wrong! OH! RIGHT! GUNS ARE BAD! Good thing a bunch of people got expelled/suspended because of this" <-said no one ever......
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:38 AM
16

That is heavily affecting one gender more than another.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:27 AM
8

Men have been trained to kill things for thousands of years (HUNTER-gatherers). Feminists have decided that you can just teach that out of someone.....
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:17 AM
2

Nesltes Did you mean Nestles? What's the reason there?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:32 AM
1

Its a joke. Calm down.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:24 AM
1

This is fantastic.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:56 PM
1

I thought the Q meant "questioning". I've also seen 'A' added for "asexual", which is apparently a thing. I hope I'm not the only person who can laugh that homosexuals are not only stealing all of our colors for rainbow symbols or whatever, but that they're also stealing all of the letters of the alphabet.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:39 AM
2

I don't know..... genocide seems pretty easy. Win an election/stage a military coup, pick a group, constantly tell everyone that said group is controlling your everyday life and trying to destroy you, gain more and more support from the general populace against said group and presto! Genocide. Cloning, on the other hand, requires a lot of science. You can't just scream really loud until science goes out of its way to bend to your every wish (and that's pretty much all I've seen radical feminists…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:36 AM
3

So far though don't the clones just end up more stupid and/or die much more quickly?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:34 AM
1

After the event: "SEE! NO STRAIGHT WHITE MEN WERE WILLING TO ATTEND OUR EVENT! PATRIARCHY! WHITE PRIVLIDGE! RAPE CULTURE!"
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:31 AM
1

I actually thought that's what happened. Like the mods decided he was asking what country the person was from in some kind of threatening way...... I wish that had been the case.....
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:13 AM
9

I read the first point. I cant even believe this. She says that women are suddenly a majority in the workforce and so now men are useless. So as a man, I'm to believe that as soon as women have any power at all, men become useless? That really helps their cause..... Also they mention how boys are failing in school. You mean those schools that suspend/expel boys for making "finger guns" and biting their pop-tarts in the shape of a gun? Gee, why would those boys be failing in school? edit: Oh God …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:42 AM
1

Your university probably has a code of conduct/standards of behavior thing. If the charge they brought against you "Endangering another students physical or mental health" is in there, yea, there's nothing you can do about it. Officially, you were discharged because you had unprotected sex with a girl, not because of rape. Granted, its stupid, but that's the good ole American legal system for you. You can argue all you want about how you were wrongfully accused of rape, and she gave you permissi…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:32 PM
1

That person you're replying to IS joking right? I can honestly never tell when someone combines the words cisgender and almost-rapes......
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:33 AM
1

I did this too, then scrolled all the way down here to make sure I wasn't going to be posting it again. Good scientific curiosity.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:30 AM
8

Just because you eventually MIGHT be able to prosecute her later doesn't mean it's anywhere near a good idea. It ends with 1) her telling you to wait somewhere while she calls the police, 2) she continues to bother you while you wait for the police, and 3) the police question you and hopefully realize the situation is all kosher and leave you be. Keep in mind that's the best case. Worst case, 1 and 2 happen and then some asshole cop shows up, decides that you're giving him/her too much lip, and …
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:22 PM
-1

SHHHHHHHHH!!! Don't give them any ideas. While yes it may be better for their education to not have distractions, there's also the social aspect that people have to go through. From kindergarten through college, the point of school isn't just to learn math, reading, writing, etc. but to learn how to socialize with people and meet friends. I would argue this is important for men and women to learn how to socialize with each other.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:39 PM
1

Here's something that I didn't notice anyone mentioning: Who cares? Gender discrimination absolutely doesn't matter if you have to go back longer than everyone has been alive. Surely, everyone knows that you need two people to have children- one woman and one man. Therefore, next to no one was effected unequally by this policy. Women currently have exactly the same opportunities even better opportunities than men (thanks women only scholarships and women only professional societies). Women try t…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:51 AM
1

Were all of the teams chosen based on this test? The article makes it sound like only 1 of the 4 colleges used a test.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 06:22 PM
2

Don't be the male version of a feminazi about things like this. If it's true, accept it, and accept that men have a different skill set. If it's wrong, then there's a problem with it. Let facts be facts. Now to fact check: What is this based on. In the article it says "this is what I learned from my sons". Now that's a pretty stupid statement that anyone who cares about truth should take offense to as its based on one woman's sons. That's an absolute maximum of POSSIBLY 8 kids, all raised the sa…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:11 PM
0

"HEY! RAPE CULTURE IS LEARNED! OBVIOUSLY A MAN TAUGHT THEM THAT BECAUSE MEN ARE THE SOURCE OF ALL EVIL IN THIS WORLD" Feminists. They're a thing....... sadly.....
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:14 PM
4

The only reason women are actually in the marines at all is because they have lower physical fitness standards. You pretty much hit this one on the head.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter