TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sgtm7 Archive

View 0 posts and 334 comments by sgtm7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That was my suspicion. Are they calling anyone under age 18 as a child?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:42 AM
-1

I decided at age 12 what my career was going to be, and at age 17 I started that career. Because of that, I also preferred older women at that age. Women my age were too immature for me. I was already working in the career I would stay in until retirement, whereas most of the women my age didn't even know what they were going to do with their lives.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:30 AM
3

No.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:49 AM
13

I agree with you in theory, but there is a problem with your proposal. I could be wrong, but I believe the majority of false accusations, are only discovered because the accuser admits they lied. If they could go to jail for doing it, very few would confess to lying about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 10:03 AM
3

It depends. It didn't hurt Clinton the first election or the second. I was surprised at the time, because I was in the Army, and if I had been caught doing what he did, my career would have been over. I then came to the conclusion, that you can't expect the general public, to care about the same thing as you.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:40 AM
-3

I have always equated long hair with femininity. That's just my opinion though, and you know what they say about opinions.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:24 AM
3

Oh. Okay. I am no fan of public transportation myself, but that is because I prefer the convenience, spontaneity, and independence of having my own vehicle. I have never considered public transportation to be "feminine" or not masculine though. That is just ludicrous.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 10:27 AM
2

Not familiar with "ick", but what exactly is wrong with buying a train ticket? Or is "train ticket" some euphemism or slang I haven't kept up with.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:56 AM
1

I agree with this 100%. False accusations and incorrect arrests have ruined people's lives. Once the public has seen you have been accused/arrested, you are judged by many in the public as guilty.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 07:54 AM
2

It has been over twenty years for me.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:04 AM
30

What would you have done if a man had done that to you? You should have done that. Women only hit men, because they believe they won't be hit back. If they knew hitting a man might result in them getting knocked the fck out, then they wouldn't do it.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 05:32 AM
6

On your last paragraph----It isn't uncommon for Black people watching the news about someone doing something ignorant to think, or depending on the company, even say outloud, "Damn. I hope that stupid mfer isn't black."
/r/MensRights04/07/26 12:29 PM
5

No. I am saying 13 years old is not prepubescent unless you are a late bloomer. 13 years old is illegal regardless, and I don't know why that poster would mention his late development.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 10:20 AM
-8

You were prepubescent at 13? Late bloomer?
/r/MensRights04/07/26 06:58 AM
-1

I agree with most of what you said, except for the part about sharing expenses. That will depend on where you live and the culture. In the countries I have lived in the last twenty years, they pretty much have traditional gender roles. Really traditional. Not like in the USA, where you are likely to encounter women who want "modern" gender roles when it benefits them, but traditional when modern doesn't benefit them.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 03:53 AM
23

Tell HR to fck off.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:55 AM
5

Slight correction. Incel is short for "involuntary celibate". Which means not only no relationship, but no sex. I have had plenty of sex when not in a relationship.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:50 AM
32

Does that mean my mother and father didn't respect each other? Since my mother was my stepmother, and my father was my sister's stepfather? This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. If a woman doesn't respect someone because they are a step father, then that woman wouldn't be worthy of respect, whether they have children or not. I never called my mother "step mother", just mom. I never called my sister "step sister", just sister. My sister never called my dad "step dad". As my mom use…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:28 AM
1

When I left the USA in 2007, there weren't as many either. Things have definitely changed.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 08:56 AM
2

The question is, where do you live? I went to visit family in the states last month. Went to three different states, California, Texas, and Mississippi. All three states, there were a LOT of fat people. Saw them every single day, wherever I went.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 11:02 AM
1

For me, shoddy reporting, incorrect details, brings the veracity of the entire article into question.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:47 PM
1

I wasn't commenting on that. I was commenting on inconsistencies in the article.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 12:21 PM
6

How many businesses are named "John Doe and daughter(s)"? I have never heard of any. That would seem to contradict your assertion. Also, why would you leave out "& sons" from your criteria?
/r/MensRights14/06/26 06:35 AM
2

I didn't mean the sex was at different occasions on different ages on those occasions. The article stated the minor's age three different times during the article. In two of those instances, they referred to a party in July 2024. In one instance they said he was 16 at that party. In another instance, they said he was 17 at that party.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:05 PM
1

I don't see the comment you are replying to, but pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent children. 16 or 17 year olds aren't prepubescent. So the correct description would be "statutory rapist".
/r/MensRights12/06/26 02:29 PM
3

In the article linked, the age is stated as 16 on two occasions, and as 17 one time.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 02:25 PM
13

People have been marrying at a later age. So not surprising. As of December 2025, the estimated median age at first marriage increased to 30.8 for men and 28.4 for women.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 04:47 AM
4

According to the article, the majority of those men are not working due to disability. I am curious how many of the total are just retired. I retired last year, so I am part of that 1/3 as well.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:39 AM
4

Can a man choose a woman driver? Can a man choose to only have male drivers?
/r/MensRights15/05/26 11:30 PM
1

Yeah, when we were in the military, our pay was public knowledge. Once we became civilians, we found no reason to keep salary secret.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:27 PM
2

Never had a civilian job where I had women coworkers.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:56 PM
2

Maybe because the majority of my coworkers were always former military, we never had any problem sharing salary information with each other.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:55 PM
1

Informal, incorrect usage doesn't change the definition. Any dictionary will have the word "unlawful" in the definition for murder. When using it as a declaration of an actual killing, it should refer only to an unlawful homicide.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:51 PM
1

I have never watched the show, but posts from others indicates she is a villain. So not being portrayed as a good person.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:15 AM
1

Slight terminology correction. Abortion is killing. It isn't "murder". Murder is a legal term for illegal killing. Since abortion is legal, it isn't murder. Just like capital punishment is killing, but it isn't murder. Self-defense/justifiable homicide is killing, but it isn't murder.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 08:56 AM
1

There are plenty of songs where they talk about beating and/or killing a woman. And they usually don't use the word "woman" either. They weren't cancelled.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 01:30 PM
1

No!
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:43 AM
-1

Who said anything about "justifying" anything? Right or wrong, people have a tendency to assume different gender roles. It doesn't mean their assumptions are correct.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:27 AM
0

It has to do with people assuming certain gender roles.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:17 AM
1

That was my thought as well. Plenty of misandrist, man bashing subreddits.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 03:42 PM
1

You said there was no female equivalent to this. There is. If I was to go to a car mechanic with my wife, the mechanic would direct his questions to me.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 12:28 PM
0

Yes. It is discrimination against men and women.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:46 AM
0

Obviously for you it is.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 11:58 PM
0

Your post makes no sense.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 11:56 PM
0

But not being allowed to be conscripted IS discrimination against women.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 11:23 PM
6

I don't understand your post. Woman are not conscripted in South Korea. Are you saying if they were conscripted, that would mean they were being discriminated against?
/r/MensRights21/02/26 02:58 AM
5

You never helped your dad do things growing up? Or you just never knew who your dad was?
/r/MensRights21/02/26 01:43 AM
6

Because now I can have him either help me, or have him actually do the heavy lifting.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:51 AM
9

I have found it to be quite relevant. It will be even moreso when my teenage son moves out.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:21 AM
-3

What state are you in? In most states, that house would be considered "separate property" and not subject to division in a divorce. As is any property owned prior to marriage. I ran across this with my last marriage. I owned everything prior to our marriage. So at divorce, she was entitled to nothing. My lawyer told me I was being more generously than I needed to be, because I gave her one of the cars, and some money.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 02:15 AM
1

No drivel, just facts. If you got out of your mom's basement, you might know that. Since that isn't likely, you could just do an internet search.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:22 AM
0

NO. The registration requirement is 18 to 25, and you must register BEFORE age 26. Until your 26th birthday, you are still 25. Once you turn 26 you would be guilty of not registering between the age of 18 to 25. People already serving in the military prior to age 18, are not required to register for selective service. So someone serving in the miltary from age 17 until past the age of 25(aka age 26+), are not be required, nor expected, to register. Only a siillyvilian who has never served would …
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:08 AM
2

Interesting you mention that. Ironically, the majority of people who served in Vietnam were volunteers. The majority of people who served in WWII were drafted. That is bewildering unless you know the reasons behind those stats. In WWII, the reason is because in 1942 FDR issued an executive order ending voluntary enlistment for men aged 18 to 37. He did this so they could control which service and jobs men would go to, based on the needs of the government. Volunteers get to choose, draftees go wt…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 05:54 AM
-2

It is only mandatory for those age 18 to 25, who are not in the military. I point that out because I joined the Army at 17 and stayed until I retired at age 37. Therefore, I never had to register. However, even if I had not stayed until retirement, as long as I stayed until age 26, I still would not have had to register. Although the penalties for failing to register can be harsh, with fines up to 250K, and imprisonment up to 5 years, no one has been prosecuted for it since 1983. That being said…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 05:27 AM
3

I haven't had a women at my place of work in nearly twenty years. Last time I did, there was no favoritism shown to the one women in the office.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 02:39 AM
68

There is a difference between not being happy and being unhappy. The problem is that many women want that "fairy tale" they grew up dreaming about. Most men didn't have that dream about marriage. Men are happy being "content". Contentment is often not good enough for many women. They aren't happy just being content. Whereas men are blissful being content.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:44 AM
32

They aren't teenage girls, they are teenage women.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:28 AM
0

What are you talking about? What sins are you talking about? They had a conscription from 1956 to 2011. What sins did they commit between 1956 and 2011?
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:46 AM
5

He said non-nationals were exempt. A citizen would be considered a German national.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:24 AM
6

This is not irregular. The majority of countries with conscription, do not conscript non-citizens.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:28 AM
12

I left Germany in 1995. Until your post, I didn't know they had stopped conscription in Germany. A quick search, confirmed they stopped it in 2011.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:22 AM
3

Not in our household. My little sister was spoiled compared to me and my big sister. But that was due to them having more money by the time she came along. There wasn't no, don't hit girls rule either. It was don't hit anyone unless they hit you first, and that me and my sisters were expected to stand up for/protect each other.
/r/MensRights05/11/25 01:13 PM
1

Reading Art 12a, it doesn't read to me that it excludes conscripting women. Saying men are subject to something, doesn't disallow women being subject to the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 11:49 AM
1

If the victim was guilty of rape or not, the only difference with her actions would be in the morality of it, not in the legality of it. It is still murder, regardless. Notice I said "guilty" and not "found guilty" or "convicted". The ruling of a jury doesn't determine if someone is actually guilty. Guilty people have been found "not guilty", and innocent people have been found "guilty".
/r/MensRights17/09/25 02:45 AM
1

You were downvoted, but I get what you are saying. Logically, no they are not. After all, adults can make more children.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 10:08 AM
1

Most men between the age of 18 and 25 are required to register. If required to register, not registering keeps you from getting federal financial aid, federal jobs, training etc., but it is not required to vote.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 09:41 AM
0

Really hard to discuss one topic regarding two different countries. For example, you mentioned voting rights being tied to conscription. That has never been the case in the USA. In fact it was pretty much the opposite. In the past, military members overseas were often disenfranchised, because of state voter registration requirements. As recently as the Vietnam War period, the voting age was higher than the draft age. Also, before the amendments passed after the US Civil War, voting rights were p…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 10:22 AM
4

You probably need to specify which country you are referring to. And then, to which jurisdiction in that country.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:19 AM
1

I retired from the Army 22 years ago, after serving for 20 years. So no, not young.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:25 PM
23

Women have higher standards of cleaning? That has not been my experience. Years ago, I decided to accept that no civilian woman, will ever have the same standard of cleanliness as me.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 11:55 AM
0

I wouldn't call 17 year old a boy. I would call them a young man.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:18 AM
0

You are claiming I said something that wasn't said. I was only correcting your assertion that they were "her students". They weren't. Not even in the same school. What I will say, is that 17 years old is below the age of majority, but it is NOT a child. And even though women seem to be more immature than men, I would say the same, regardless of gender. I was already in the Army at age 17.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 07:47 AM
-6

You should read the article. They weren't her students. She was a middle school teacher, and they were high school students. So no position of authority over them.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:18 AM
1

There were two choices. They could just be incompetent.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:51 AM
1

None of your three reasons actually apply to piercing. If you don't keep earrings in, the holes will close up in a month or less. I didn't get my ear pierced until after I retired from Army at age 37. What kind of complications was I supposed to have had?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 11:37 AM
1

What the hell is a passport bro dating site?
/r/MensRights03/08/25 07:06 AM
1

Not at all. Never heard of it, until I saw the post here on reddit.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 11:49 AM
14

They surprisingly have some pretty fair property laws as well.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:58 AM
5

Long ago, there was a forum on MSN, for women who were the bread winners in their family. Eye-opening.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 04:43 AM
28

His point is that women are not subject to the draft. I don't know why he singled out South Korea though. Of the 60 countries that have an active draft, only 12 draft women. Ironically, North Korea drafts women.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:53 AM
1

The person you are responding to, clearly said they were a "lady".
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:38 PM
0

Oh. You agreed to use a mediator rather than go to court. That changes things. You should not have agreed to do that.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 01:24 AM
1

Under what grounds would the state of Texas force you to pay for her lawyer? Is she mentally or physically incapable of working? Who or what agency, told you, you had to pay for her lawyer? Sounds like you are being bamboozled. Especially, since there is no legal requirement to use a lawyer for a divorce. Something sounds fishy here. .
/r/MensRights11/07/25 01:18 AM
1

I was assuming married. End result, still the same though. They go by the jurisdiction that issued the child support order. So if the mother moves to a man hating state, before requesting child support, the father is just SOL.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 12:55 AM
1

What man hating state are you in, that would force you to pay for your wife's lawyer? I can guess, but you should let us know as a PSA, so people will know to never move there.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 12:11 AM
1

What do you mean by "sue"? I am going to assume you meant, that if the mother moves to California, and then "files" for divorce, beating the father in Texas to the punch. In which case, the man is out of luck. So it is best for the man to file before the woman has a chance to move to a man hating state.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 09:43 AM
2

When I lived in the USA, I did a large amount of my own car maintenance and repairs. Same for home repair. I pretty much stopped when I started working overseas, because not only was I making more money, labor was much cheaper in the places I have lived overseas.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 02:20 PM
1

The state that issues the original child support order retains jurisdiction, even if the children move to a different state. If both parents no longer live in the issuing state, the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) helps determine which state has jurisdiction in interstate cases.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:42 AM
2

For your second point(child support), it depends on the state. In Texas, regardless of actual income, the calculation for child support is capped at an income of $9,200. So they could make 1 billion dollars a month, and the most child support they would have to pay for one child is $1,840 per month.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 02:01 AM
1

Too often, we don't tell the people we appreciate, that we appreciate them. So when someone actually tells us, we appreciate them telling us. This is not gender specific. I make sure that I occasionally let my wife know, that I appreciate her.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 04:27 AM
1

Don't get married in a man hating state that would award a woman everything in a divorce. Get married in a state, that is a community property state. So the most she will get is half. If you can, have all your stuff paid for, BEFORE you get married, so that your stuff is considered separate property, rather than marital property. That way, it won't be considered for division during a divorce.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 12:44 PM
1

When I lived in El Paso, TX (which is 85% Mexican-American) for ten years, I saw it. In the case that what I saw was due to them being Mexican-American, rather than Mexican nationals, I did a search to be sure. The search results agree with what I have seen. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/mexican-culture/mexican-culture-naming
/r/MensRights29/05/25 01:07 AM
1

Did you forget, that I mentioned Mexico, first? They do speak Spanish there.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:48 PM
1

My bad. I should not have assumed all Spanish origin countries do the same thing. The only ones I am really familiar with are Mexicans, and Filipinos. Filipinos aren't Latin, but due to hundreds of years of colonization by Spain(and actually administered by what is present day Mexico), they follow the same naming convention.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:50 AM
4

What? Yes they do take their husbands last name. They just don't lose their maiden name. Christina Maria Vazquez marries Jose Pablo Diaz. Christina becomes Christina Maria Vazquez Diaz.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 03:28 AM
4

No more "weird" than killing the baby,without giving the father any notice.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 12:14 AM
6

It wouldn't be him leaving at any moment, just like she can only kill the baby before it is born, not after. Also, you missed the point about it not being about abortion. It is about the ability to completely escape parental responsibility. That it should be equal for both parties.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:40 PM
6

I would imagine it is a matter of reciprocity, more so than caring one way or the other. If the mother can kill it, and completely escape parental responsibility, without any input from the father, then the father should also be able to completely escape parental responsibility, without any input from the mother.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:07 PM
5

Why would you need or want to convince the men of this sub of anything? Why would you assume there are no pro-abortion men on this sub?
/r/MensRights24/05/25 12:58 AM
13

Morally acceptable to who? To you? Just convince yourself that the baby doesn't count as alive, until it is born. You can convince yourself of anything, if you try hard enough.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:10 PM
1

According to the IRS website the ability to claim alimony stopped on 1January 2019. In Texas, although not mandatory, you have the option to send it through an office in San Antonio. Which isn't actually "the county", since neither of us were anywhere close to SA. Sending through that office , insures there is an official record, that can't be disputed. I never did garnishment. My understanding was that was an option if you wanted it, or if someone was delinquent, it could be required.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:11 AM
1

Are you talking about child support or alimony? It is child support, that is usually sent through a local government. Never heard of that for alimony. Child support has never been claimable, but alimony was, until 6 years ago.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:09 AM
3

I had typed a detailed response to how your tax preparer who told you that alimony is not tax-deductible was a frigging idiot. Then I went to the IRS website, to provide a link to prove how much of an idiot your tax preparer is. Imagine my shock to discover that "I" am the frigging idiot. The rule that alimony is tax-deductible, and must be claimed as income by the receiver, was changed in January 2019 (eleven years after my last divorce). Even though I divorced in a state (Texas), that only awa…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:09 AM
4

I have few male friends that had kids in their 50s. I think there are pros and cons. One of them retired a few years after his daughter was born. He has more money and time than he did when he was younger. The other two are still working, but at their stage in their career, they have more time and money,than when younger.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 05:39 AM
3

Probably because nowadays more men are fat. I never felt comfortable going shirtless. When I was a 136 pound 17 year old Private, I felt too skinny. Now that I am a 185 pound 59 year old, I am too fat.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 06:48 AM
1

No. They are not.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 07:53 AM
1

No, an immigrant moves to another place, with the intent of becoming a citizen. Once they actually become citizens, they are no longer immigrants.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 02:41 PM
7

In any society, there will be those who are racist or bigots. Fortunately, they are only a small minority in the USA. They are outliers. I know in other more homogenous societies, that isn't necessarily the case.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 11:59 AM
1

Once someone becomes a citizen,they are no longer an immigrant.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 09:18 AM
1

You didn't notice my post was talking about the past? This is because I am married. Also, I haven't lived in the USA in nearly twenty years.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:07 PM
3

No. It isn't immoral.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 06:25 AM
0

When I was young, I either went with at least 5 years older, or those with a kid. The reason was because childless women my age, were too immature for me. In my older age, the chances of finding a childless woman was pretty slim to none.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 05:54 AM
1

When single, the only reason I would go out, would be looking for puzzy, and most of the time I went alone.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 08:31 AM
1

My point was, that just being employed, is a very low bar in the west. Many western women, not only expect them to be employed, but to make a specific amount of money. Just being employed, is not enough.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:13 AM
3

You are going to make many of the western men here jealous. Just being employed makes you a sought after man.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:12 AM
4

That would mean one of two things: They aren't seriously trying to do it, and are just trying to get attention. They are just incompetent.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:14 PM
1

Except....... There are multiple doctors posting in this reddit, saying you are full of shit.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:44 AM
-1

You don't need someone else to take a photo of yourself. This was true, even before cell phones.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:37 AM
16

The 2013 reauthorization added a non-discrimination provision that prohibits organizations receiving funding under the Act from discriminating on the basis of sex, although the law allows an exception for "sex segregation or sex-specific programming" when it is deemed to be "necessary to the essential operations of a program." Jan Brown, the Founder and Executive Director of the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women contends that the Act may not be sufficient to ensure equal access to servic…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 07:33 AM
30

Unless they figure out a way to do something special, without specifically targeting men. You know , like the violence against women act. Most violence is committed against men, but yet there is a special legislation addressing violence against women.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 06:22 AM
1

I am older, so the first few wouldn't be as big a deal as they would be for a younger guy.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:04 PM
2

Number 6 alone is enough to disqualify.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 10:43 AM
1

It might be traumatic for an early adolescent. Adolescence is age 10 to 19. The age of the high school student was missing from the article. I don't think it would be traumatic for older adolescents. Hell, I was in basic training at age 17. I was independent and on my own, and was definitely having sex as an adolescent.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:39 AM
95

This is pretty much a US thing. Although there are a few outliers, other countries only do it for religious reasons. Pretty much not a thing in most of Europe or Asia, or any other country that isn't Jewish or Muslim.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:46 AM
1

Then you can stop and get in a relationship when that happens.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 03:22 PM
17

Because you don't need to be in a relationship to get sex on a semi-regular basis?
/r/MensRights26/02/25 08:08 AM
3

March not taken? March is women's history month. That wouldn't go over well. LOL.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:44 AM
1

Words. Use your words! A question indicates they would like an answer to their question. Adding a question, asking "What do you think, about the opinion of the author of this article, who disagrees with this assertion?", would have had people actually reading the article.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 05:39 AM
3

That is the problem with one sentence posts that are questions. Unless you only want them answering your question, then they should add at least one more sentence, clarifying.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:27 AM
4

What's the point of posting a one sentence post, that is a question? Then expecting people to comment on anything other than that one sentence question?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 02:18 AM
26

Isn't carfax a service to look up a car you want to buy? I have used the service before, and never felt ashamed for using it.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:31 PM
2

If the chain of custody is somehow broken and the wrong sample gets tested, it would be a false negative. Can't imagine any likely way to have a false positive.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:21 AM
1

Actually no I didn't say I was lucky. I said I "might" have been lucky, but I didn't think so.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 04:16 AM
1

Actually, no, I wasn't lucky. I learned from my first wife, what things to look out for and avoid regarding sex. So not luck, but experience.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 03:56 AM
1

I don't think I am particularly intuitive, so maybe I have just been lucky in that respect. I don't think so though.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:39 PM
-35

You make sure she truly enjoys sex, before you even make it a committed relationship, much less get married.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 01:43 PM
76

If you have to "go hat in hand" to have sex with your wife, then you married the wrong woman.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:37 AM
1

Unless they keep their finances separate, then how is anyone getting screwed? If together they pay less taxes than what they would pay filing separately, then no one is getting "screwed".
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:21 PM
0

Based on my experiences, most people (regardless of gender), don't understand how taxes work. I have lost track of the number of people, who think the amount of refund they get, is indicative of how much tax they paid.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:19 PM
2

How much that gets withheld is not equal to what your tax liability is. You could be single, and fill out your W4 form claiming married with 9 exemptions. Your withholding would be very low, but when you file your taxes, you would owe a LOT. The reverse is also true, if you fill out your W4 claiming single, with no exemptions, but was actually married with 5 kids, then when you file taxes, you would get a huge refund. I always had a thing about not letting the government keeping my money interes…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 12:16 PM
3

So why would you tell him to post it somewhere else, as if it didn't belong here?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:54 AM
7

Why? Men's rights only matter in the USA?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:55 AM
1

I never paid attention to that. It went against my lifetime experiences.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:49 PM
1

Where you get married is irrelevant. Where you get divorced is what matters with divorce settlements.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 09:59 AM
1

Since when is there alimony in Texas? Last time I lived there, only if the spouse is mentally or physically incapable of working, could they get spousal support.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 09:58 AM
1

Because that is only statistics for proven false allegations. There are no statistics for false allegations that haven't been proven to be false. How are most false allegations discovered? By either witnesses or cameras. Or by the accuser admitting they lied.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:58 AM
6

I wouldn't want to give up the ability to pee standing up.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:08 AM
1

It is location specific. Depends on the state you were in. Without doing a search, I can't say when it changed for all states. Also you didn't need a bank account to survive in the pre-digital age. Hell, they didn't make direct deposit mandatory for military personnel until 1985, a few years after I joined. Even today, there are countries that are very cash driven, and many(if not most), people don't have bank accounts.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:58 AM
0

Yes, but men and women are opposed equally by those regimes.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:55 AM
-2

You only talk about countries in Europe, as if Europe is the world. It isn't. .
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:56 AM
-3

You wrote a book, but still haven't come close to proving "most countries".
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:57 PM
-2

A pedophile wouldn't be attracted to a girl that old. Pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent children.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:54 AM
24

Most places? He isn't in the USA. What are the "most places", you are referring to.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:51 AM
5

At 17, he was over the age of consent, but she was under the age of consent.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:50 AM
2

Generals do what the civilians over them tell them to do. Don't blame the military for the actions of sillyvilians.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:20 AM
6

Who knows. The only time it will be found out is if they are caught, or if they admit they lied.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 04:01 PM
3

Where is that bot when you need him? It is "paid" not "payed".
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:50 AM
5

There is a difference between a poor country, and a well off country in an economic slump.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:17 PM
3

I have heard that all my life. However it hasn't been my experience. Females do not mature faster than males. Just the opposite in my experience.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:00 AM
11

Not all Asians are the same, anymore than all westerners are the same. I haven't noticed the dynamic you are talking about in the Phillipine families. It is generally the oldest and/or most successful child, gender being irrelevant.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 07:34 AM
64

How would you know how uncommon it is, since the only time you would find out is when the false accusers were caught or confessed?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 05:28 AM
4

Although idealistically, I would like to see harsh penalties for false accusers, it might not be the greatest idea. Because a good number of false rape accusations, are only discovered as false, when the accuser admits to it being false. So, if there was a very harsh penalty for false accusations, then if there is no way they will be found it it was false, very few would confess to making a false accusation. Which might result in more people being jailed for false accusations.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:09 AM
5

No. The overwhelming majority of violent crime victims are men.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 05:55 AM
4

I am a lesbian trapped in a man's body.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 04:49 AM
5

Not everyone. Only civilian males aged 18 - 26. I never had to register.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 04:30 AM
6

Then vote for a candidate from another party.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:03 AM
1

Unless they just don't know about it. I don't know how or if they actually inform that age group, because it never actually applied to me.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:37 AM
-6

Although you were downvoted, I agree with you. Granted, I never registered myself, but I can see the convenience of not having to do it. Note: Only civilians between the age of 18 to 26 need to register. Active duty miltary don't register. I joined at 17, and retired at 37.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:12 AM
2

Depending on where in Asia. In some places, 50K won't have you living any better than in the USA. In other places, 50K is way more than what you would need, to live a very comfortable life.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:07 PM
7

I find this amazing. I would have thought the number who showered at least once a day would be around the 95% range, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:42 AM
1

Yeah. I voted in the primaries before. The state I lived in only allowed voting in one parties primary though. Whereas, I would have preferred to vote in all of them, and pick the person I liked the most from each party. That way, I would be at least content, no matter who won.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 09:02 AM
2

Alimony and child support are two different things. Two different payments , that are treated differently by the state and the IRS. Alimony can be deducted from your taxable income , and the person receiving it is suppose to claim it as income . Child support is not dedectible , and doesn't get claimed as income . With child support, in some states, delinquent payers can be jailed for contempt of court for not paying . Not the case for alimony . Not sure why the OP said "alimony/child support".
/r/MensRights11/06/24 07:28 AM
3

In Texas, it is 20% for the first child , and an additional 5% for each additional child . Not to exceed 50%.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 07:23 AM
2

How it worked in the state I was divorced . Any state that doesn't do that , the child support payer is at risk.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 07:21 AM
1

When I was paying child support , I was advised by my lawyer , as well as other people to pay through the state. And that any extra payment paid outside normal payments , that are paid directly to the custodial parent , doesn't count for anything . Same category as a gift . Paying through the state, there is a irrefutable record. Making a case like the OP impossible to happen .
/r/MensRights11/06/24 07:19 AM
12

That was my thought. Is showing your dick to your son some kind of new bonding ritual that I missed out on?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 05:23 PM
13

Prostitution should not even be illegal. Killing your unborn baby, is legal based on the idea of the right to do what you want with your body. Seems hypocritical that prostitution is illegal.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:13 AM
8

Question. Was the GI Joe movie targeted at males, females, or both? I know the answer, without the makers coming out and saying it.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:11 PM
4

If it is going to be a law, they should add a section, stating that if the sex is bad, any promise of marriage is null and void.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:08 AM
1

True for virgins marrying virgins. Not true to only having sex in committed relationships. Sex in only committed relationships, is not some magical block to a disease that has no symptoms. The strains of HPV that cause cancer have no symptoms.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 05:27 AM
1

Considering the strains of HPV that cause cancer, typically don't cause noticeable symptoms, I don't see how monogamy would make any difference.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 02:05 PM
1

Not debating anything. She informed of her choice. You were informed. So now you have a choice, based on the information you have received. Pretty simple and straightforward to me. No debate required.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:20 AM
2

The "responsible" thing to do is to kill the baby? Obviously she disagrees, and have let you know. Your move.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:46 AM
0

Only twenty? You are just starting.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 08:44 AM
8

Even without the issue of paternity fraud, it should be mandatory for medical reasons. Hell, even for the rare instances of the hospital mixing up babies.
/r/MensRights13/01/24 01:38 PM
1

Since women are more likely to not be direct, it is easy to believe they are interested when they are only being friendly. When single, I definitely preferred when women let me know right away, that they were taken. If I was interested, then there waa no wasted time.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:33 PM
1

I would feel no more obligation than I would if it was a man.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:07 PM
1

Haven't worked and lived in two GCC countries, and visited 3 others, I will tell you that not all Muslim countries are poor.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:36 AM
1

No rights. She has every right to kill the baby, regardless of what you say or want.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 02:45 PM
9

Partisanship ruins every thing. I get so tired of people bringing politics into every subject.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:49 PM
4

Revenge is like the sweetest joy next to gettin' pussy. ---Tupac Shakur
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:35 AM
2

Revenge is like the sweetest joy next to gettin' pussy. ---Tupac Shakur
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:34 AM
2

Except, "Incel" is a shortening of the term "Involuntary Celibate". Of course, that is somewhat of a misnomer, because the definition of "celibate" is someone who voluntarily abstains from sex. Regardless, what exactly would "Femcel" mean? Female celibate?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 08:33 AM
14

All over the world, the overwhelming majority of women date UP. Her belief is no different than the reality.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:23 PM
1

I don't know if "greed" would be the word, but I remember reading that men are more likely to negotiate for a higher salary than women are.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 09:15 AM
3

They did have a point that it should be done at birth, not when the kids are older.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:24 AM
3

No, only Islam and Judaism do it.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:15 PM
5

I have ever even pretended to care about women issues, and have never dated a woman that even brought them up.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:22 AM
3

How about making it so that you don't get alimony unless you are physically or mentally incapable of working? These were the rules the last time I got divorced in Texas around 20 years ago. Note: There were also an exception for abused spouses, or if there were special needs children.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 11:51 AM
5

There are downsides to both genders. That is due to the different social constructs of the various communities/countries. The point of the post, were the people who thought being male would be "great" and we're surprised to find out that wasn't the case.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 04:40 PM
3

Even including the urban dictionary in my search, I couldn't find a definition that fits anything that would fit the context of your sentence. What is "tors"?
/r/MensRights17/06/23 07:33 AM
6

Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:13 AM
13

Actually, in several countries/jurisdictions, rape is defined in such a way that the definition couldn't be applied to a man unless he was being raped by another man.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 05:30 AM
6

The mother made a statement of how her son was robbed of his childhood. Yet the last sentence of the article says "At the time of her arrest, KOAA reported that Serrano and her victim were living together for a time. " So my question is - - - How the fudge was her thirteen year old child living with someone who isn't a relative?!
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:29 AM
2

I have not noticed bachelors being shamed. If anything, I see women being envious of older bachelors, because there is no biological clock as a factor.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 08:46 AM
4

Although I find it annoying false accusers get no more than a slap on the wrist, I dont think harsh sentences for false accusers will be a deterrent nor helpful. That is because the majority of the time it is proven it was a false accusation is when the false accuser confesses. It isn't actual rape victims who this would make it a danger for, but the victim of false accusations. False accusers would never recant if it meant harsh punishment. Which would mean victims of false accusation are more …
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:43 PM
-1

No. I got married in 2021, but I was not nervous when I was dating. I haven't lived in a western country since 2007.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:50 PM
5

I was never taught that.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:03 AM
3

Women are either not "really" making an attempt, and/or they are just incompetent.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 08:43 AM
7

No one you replied was arguing right or wrong. Being wrong doesn't make it illegal. Being right doesn't make it legal.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:57 PM
17

What difference does it matter what age they are mutilated? Edited to answer the question: It is thought of as a right of passage into manhood. As far as I am concerned, it doesn't matter what reasoning they use to justify it.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:10 AM
3

I saw a History Channel Special on sex one time. It covered the subject of male circumcision(aka MGM), and they said when it started being popular in the USA, it was said that doctors gave all kind of BS excuses for why they should do it. One of those reasons given, was that they said it would keep young boys from masturbating. Now honestly, that could appear to be a valid reason to a woman, or to a man that wasn't circumcised. As someone that wasn't chopped, I used to wonder how a man that was …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:44 PM
34

Washing my dick has always worked for me. Would you remove your daughter's labia to prevent smegma?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:16 AM
10

I only visited that sub a few times, before I came to the conclusion that "menslib" was the opposite of its title, and wasn't worth my time going there.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:36 PM
1

A man is "at fault" when a woman assaults him? Sorry, but No! Would you say that a woman is at fault when a man assaults her? Physical violence is only acceptable in response to physical violence. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 03:32 PM
1

I am a straight man, and I don't like any sport except for poker. I think they are boring.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:17 PM
1

1st off I was 10 years old! I didn't even know what sex was. Not really relevant, whether you knew what sex was or not. People mature at different rates. By the time I was eleven, I was jerking off 2 or 3 times a day. Being horny doesn't make you a rapist.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 11:47 AM
5

I have heard the same thing many times. However, I personally experienced the opposite, and the police officers that came, asked me if I wanted to press charges against her. Now years later, during a security clearance update/renewal, they asked me about the incident, and "somehow" incorrectly interpreted the report, and thought I was the one who was the abuser, rather than the victim.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 03:16 PM
9

That would depend if you live in a man hating state or not. In Texas, if they can't agree on who keeps the house, it is sold and the equity split. If they can agree on who will stay in the house, the person staying in the house pays the mortgage. If there is any equity, the person staying in the house, pays the other person half the equity.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 02:29 PM
-9

If she didn’t point out her mixed heritage, I would argue it’s impossible to see it in her. Impossible to see it? If by impossible, you mean like me, you didn't know she was mixed and just assumed she was black.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:27 PM
5

Under what grounds were you banned? I read through the rules, and couldn't figure out why that would have got you banned. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:26 PM
2

I was never told to specifically not hit women/girls, only to not hit someone first. I did the same with my kids.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:49 PM
1

That is country dependent. Before I got married, I had a full time housekeeper, that didn't even come close to costing what my income was at time.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:00 PM
23

Depends on the country and the culture of the country. There are still plenty of countries that never went away from traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:38 PM
1

From 2000 to 2010, I paid a total of $72,000. That was $600 a month. Obviously, my income was higher than the OP. However, I didn't spend $600 a month on my son when we were still married. After divorce, my bills didn't decrease by $600 a month. If anything, I had less money. My taxes doubled after divorce.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:52 PM
4

I paid 15 years average 225/ month for my oldest son who I had full custody of his entire life. Child support is supposed to be for the child. Why were you paying child support for a child you had full custody of?
/r/MensRights16/11/22 07:49 PM
2

Most. If not all.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:37 PM
9

I don't pay taxes on the first 108K of my income. Great tax savings for me. Plus, I have lived outside the USA for over fifteen years, and I don't think I "fit in" anymore. I was married in the USA, but we weren't physically present in the USA. It was all online.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:21 PM
73

Can't speak for all American men, but for me, I married a foreign woman, and don't(and won't) live in the USA.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:33 PM
1

You are saying that unlike the way it currently is, that the accused should only be named if actually convicted of a crime? If so, I fully agree. The way it is worded, I wasn't sure if that is what you meant, or you were saying that when men are accused they aren't named unless convicted.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:42 PM
3

I really hate how the suffix "phobia" has been hijacked by people that were too lazy to come up with another terminology. A suffix "phobia" means an irrational fear or aversion to something. The majority of people who are bigoted against homosexuals(or any other group they decided to tack a "phobia" onto the end of it) are not fearful or averse to them. This puts people who actually DO have a phobia into the same category as those who are just bigoted.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 12:00 PM
0

I don't buy Apple products, so me saying I won't buy their products would be doing nothing new.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:43 PM
8

You know, many years ago, the military had proposed physical standards based on the MOS rather than blanket standards not dependent on the job. It was never implemented, because women groups protested about it. The OP is correct. Army PT standards should be based on the MOS, and the rank. A clerk doesn't need the same physical standards as an artillery crewmember.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:28 PM
8

No, you are not a dude.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:19 PM
23

That really depends on the culture and the country. I have lived in a few countries, where it is customary for the children to take care of their parents. In some cases, not only when the parents are too old to work, but whenever one or more of the children have "made it".
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:44 PM
1

I am an older guy and not part of the current "woke" culture, but even I am having a hard time seeing any correlation between the alphabet people and porn.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:55 AM
1

That person who responded to you must have a reading comprehension problem. The rule 1 says identity OR vulnerability.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:26 AM
2

Not only can they avoid all parental responsibilities by having the baby killed, if they have the baby, as long as they put no father on the birth certificate, they can just give it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:26 AM
1

I am not talking legality, I am talking reality. Not being charged or not being found guilty, doesn't mean they are innocent, anymore than being charged and/or being found guilty, doesn't mean they aren't innocent of the crime charged and/or convicted. Of course we would likely think that more guilty people go free, than innocent people are wrongly convicted and/or imprisoned.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:11 AM
4

Yep, when I was paying child support, the amount I paid for child support was nowhere close to how much I spent on my son when I was married.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:31 PM
15

Oh. My fault. I just saw the dailymail.uk tag, and though it was in the UK. The top tax bracket in the USA is 37%, so you are right, the math doesn't add up. The attorney fees would have to be at the 2 million mark to drop his share down that much.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 09:52 AM
21

Not taxed at 50%. Top tax bracket in UK is 45%. Then his attorneys are charging over a million in fees.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 09:35 AM
1

No. Not guilty doesn't mean innocent. Not guilty means the jury does not didn't think the prosecution proved their case. A prosecutor not bringing a case to trial, doesn't mean they think the suspect is innocent, it means they don't believe they can get a conviction.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:46 AM
-4

What kind of evidence? Unless there is video/audio recording during the event, or witnesses, there is no way to prove rape. It is a he-said, she-said, and what the jury believes. Granted, violent rape by a stranger is different, but that isn't what we are talking about here.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:48 PM
1

How do you prove if sex was consensual or not? Not being able to prove a rape occurred is not proving it didn't occur.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:50 PM
-9

Exactly how would you prove they are lying?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:39 PM
-8

The problem is that it is nearly impossible to prove they are lying. Unless they have some kind of evidence, which for most false accusations they don't have. Most false accusations are found out because the false accusers confessed to it. Like I said before, if the only way you could be convicted of a crime was to actually confess to it, the prisons would be nearly empty.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:19 AM
16

"Lying cunt" works for me.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:50 AM
5

True. In my opinion, just like the withhold the identity of the accuser, they should withhold the identity of the accused, unless they are convicted in a court of law.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:47 AM
25

I was thinking the same thing. I agree with the spirit of the idea, but the reality is, that if there were consequences, they would just never admit they were lying. Imagine if for any crime, you could only be convicted if you confessed to it. There would be hardly any criminals, just crimes committed by "someone". I can only think of one instance where they had evidence the people were lying. Two teenage girls accused their teacher of sexually assaulting them. They had a time and place they cla…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:46 AM
7

Exactly! I see it over and over again online, and have damn near given up on correcting people about the actual definition of words.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:06 PM
-5

Recognizing a scientific/biological fact is not justifying discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:39 AM
4

For the same reason why it is acceptable and "funny" when a woman kicks a man in the balls, but it would not be acceptable or funny if a man kicked a woman in her vagina. Double standards.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 11:25 AM
4

Try again.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:20 AM
27

Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:39 AM
1

Many laws are sexist and/or hypocritical. The existence of the Violence Against Women Act(VAWA) is a perfect example. A special law addressing violence against women, even though most violence is committed against men.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 05:42 AM
2

No. Everyone doesn't.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 09:40 AM
7

No, I picked the term I intended. Statutory rape applies to sex with someone below the age of consent. It covers any age below the age consent. The other terms are mental/medical terms that apply to "attraction" regardless of whether they actually act on them or not. A pedophile that never has inappropriate relations with prepubescent children is still a pedophile. Also with attraction to teenagers, the legality of acting on it will vary based on the age of consent in the jurisdiction you live.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:26 AM
3

That many people are not educated enough to know the definition of the words they use, isn't a reason not to try to teach them. If enough people use it incorrectly, the definition will change. Much like people throwing the suffix "phobia" onto everything, even though the suffix phobia means a fear. That "other thing" is not some new concept, but has been around as long as there has been an age of consent. Statutory rape covers anyone having sex with someone under the age of consent. It is a lega…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:07 AM
44

I have, and always will. I find incorrect word usage annoying. It is a pet peeve of mine.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:35 PM
15

I couldn't determine in the article: Are tubal ligations covered for women under Obamacare?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:31 PM
46

Statutory rapist. Pedophiles are only attracted to prepubescent children.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:56 PM
16

And how does he have "consequences" when around 5 billion of the 8 billion people in the world haven't had those "consequences"?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:51 PM
33

The majority of the world only practices MGM for religious reasons(Muslims and Jews). Which means that the overwhelming majority of the world doesn't do it. Unless men in the US are mentally slow compared to the rest of the world, it is no major task to wash your junk. Do you have a hard time spreading your butt cheeks and washing your azz?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:46 PM
3

No, the key is to not get divorced in a man hating state like NY.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:51 AM
13

So a woman can opt out of being a mother, either physically by killing the baby before it is born, or financially by giving it up for adoption after birth.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:38 PM
24

I am a black man. Racism against white people does exist. Perhaps you need to find a dictionary.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 05:48 PM
1

You don't know much about "American" law either, because unless it is a federal prosecution, there are no national minimum sentencing laws. It will depend on the laws of the particular state.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:20 AM
5

I was thinking the exact same thing after reading the article. The Alford plea didn't change the sentence, and a man could have done the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:26 AM
2

Or is there something I'm not understanding? The prevailing opinion, is that often when women do it, it is not a real attempt, but more of a cry for help. My opinion, is that it is a combination of the prevailing opinion and that men are just more competent and efficient at it.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:11 AM
12

It is the companies that decides the retirement age. There is no nationwide retirement age in the private sector. Hell, even in the government sector, although there is a minimum age, that minimum age is 50 years old for the federal civil service. For the military it is even younger. I retired from the Army at age 37. That being said..... Many men actually WANT to work. I have ran across a lot of my peers who continued to work well past the age they actually need to work. I have friends whose mi…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 08:25 AM
3

Green cards. Beware of women that just want to improve their financial outlook. Regardless of country, most women want to improve their financial outlook. Like I mentioned in a previous post, even in the US the majority of women still marry UP.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:54 PM
7

Yep. In the US the majority of women still marry UP. The more they earn, the smaller their dating pool is. However, for men, the more they earn, the larger their dating pool.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:51 PM
1

Really? I have been shaving my head for over 20 years, and started shaving it when I had a head full of hair. It never even considered that it would some how be considered sexual harassment to call me bald.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:38 PM
1

Yeah, there was a thread on r/askmen where a woman was complaining about an intrusive know it all, interrupting her gym work out to tell her what she was doing wrong, even after she expressed no interest in his suggestions. Someone said that this was a good reason for female only gyms. I pointed out that this wasn't a gender incident, but an intrusive, know-it-all issue, and there are plenty of women who fit that description as well. I am at 100 downvotes and counting. LOL.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:47 AM
0

Lol, white knights are the absolute worse. All in the name of trying to get laid. I can respect their motives. LOL.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 09:43 AM
1

WTF are you talking about "exposed"? I wasn't talking about the Army, but particular jobs in the Army. Other MOS had a much higher percentage of females than ours.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 07:37 PM
7

Or it is simply a matter of not wanting to do that type of work. In the Army, I repaired radar systems. Not a particularly labor intensive job. It was a job that was completely open to women, but there were very few women in the MOS.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 06:29 AM
-10

Although it is common for women in real life to have a height preference, I wouldn't pay much attention to preferences on dating apps. People put an "idea" of what they want on dating apps/websites. It doesn't mean they would reject someone in real life who don't meet those requirements. I recall years ago, before smart phones were a thing. I had seen this attractive woman's profile on the Yahoo Dating website. Her requirement was for someone taller and younger than me. So I passed over her. May…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:39 AM
1

You know what happens when you ass-u-me.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:17 AM
1

Except will has already admitted to also being with other women.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 04:42 PM
1

Will has been an emotional mess since Jada cheated though. Cheating? They both have said they have an open marriage. Or using their words "an unconventional marriage".
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:54 PM
2

I've only seen a couple of edited clips here on reddit so I missed the threats. It wasn't a "threat" per se. What he said was "Keep my wife's name out of your friggin mouth!" And he didn't say "friggin".
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:29 PM
1

I agree, that you shouldn't result to violence over words. I agree that what will Smith did was inexcusable. I even upvoted you. However.... I disagree that it isn't done in the real world. People do it all the time. Both genders. It is even looked at as "acceptable" when a woman slaps a man for words spoken.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:26 PM
1

LOL. Women actually attempt to commit suicide more often. Men are just more often successful. So it is a matter of competence and commitment.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 01:43 PM
-1

The FBI doesn't make laws. What you are referring to is the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting(UCR) not what the actual laws are in each individual state.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:05 PM
1

Yeah, in the US we have rape defined as only being penetrated, not being forced to penetrate, that definition was made by Dr. Mary P Koss, a feminist and male rape denier. I strongly agree that is wrong, but it isn't a "US" thing, because there are 50 different states(and 5 permanently inhabited territories) with various laws.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 05:32 PM
3

I would not have dropped the charges. Most women only hit men, because they don't think there will be any consequences.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:32 AM
4

I have said before, many (if not most) women only want equality/modern gender roles when it is to their benefit. When it is not to their benefit, they want traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:17 AM
1

I have always believed this. Even if proven innocent, just the accusation of a sex crime can scar someone for life. Of course in the Emmet Till case, it wasn't an accusation of rape.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:16 PM
0

By "system", I assume you mean the Selective Service System. Registration for the system is required at age 18. Active duty service members between the ages of 18 to 26 do not have to register with the Selective Service System. Since I was in the military from age 17 to 37, I was never required to register. Therefore, like I said, I was never in the "system".
/r/MensRights13/03/22 08:33 AM
-10

Your comment is an indication you never served. Enlisting is not the same as registering for selective service.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 07:57 PM
-7

No I wasn't. You only register at age 18. I enlisted when I was 17, and stayed in until I retired at age 37.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 07:33 PM
-4

I am an American.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 07:24 PM
5

I never had to do that.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 05:31 PM
2

And he says not allowed to participate in it. And he's completely right. I have done the same thing you have done, with no ill effects. Are you two just assuming he can't participate, or have you seen something to verify your assumption?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 08:25 AM
3

I was going to mention the exact same thing. The most recent tweet is from 12 years ago. Which to me, would indicate they can't find anything more recent.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 11:13 AM
5

Here is a question, I have not seen brought up during these discussions: Does Ukraine society as a whole stick to traditional gender roles? I don't know the answer, but if they do, then should nations with more "modern" type gender roles really try to assign their values onto Ukraine? I ask this because I have lived in countries that are more patriarchal than most western countries, and they pretty much stick to gender roles.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 10:48 AM
7

Before I switched to repairing radar systems, my first MOS in the Army was in artillery. The fact you think artillery is one of the categories where physical strength doesn't matter indicates you know little about artillery. That you think the person who drives a tank only drives indicates the same.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 06:47 AM
3

When I lived in the states, most of my first dates were at my house. Dinner and videos at the house. A woman doesn't immediately have the right to have money spent on her at a restaurant. She has to earn that right. I generally didn't spend money on a woman until after we had slept together.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:39 AM
0

They sound like a bunch of lazy, whiny, slackers to me.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:49 PM
21

The OP said the woman was upset because the world objectifies women.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 06:52 AM
3

Selling nude pics, means she has money now. I keep my bitches broke. Bitch wake up with some money, she subject to go crazy. You need to keep your pimp hand strong. Pimping ain't easy, but it's necessary.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/21 09:05 AM
1

Same thing I was going to say. If you have to go through all that to bang a hooker, then you are picking the wrong hookers, or you live in the wrong place.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/20 07:15 AM
3

Why would you want to understand women? Women understand women, and they hate each other!
/r/TheRedPill28/12/20 05:03 AM
8

I was doing this WAY before the pandemic. Invite them to the house for dinner and video(pre-Netflix, so Blockbuster). I made the dinner date early enough, so that if she wasn't up for sex, I still had plenty of time to hit the club. This probably accounted for 80% of my first dates.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/20 04:54 AM
-1

Only men with little peckers worry about a woman's "numbers". It is because they are worried they can't "measure up". I never care about a woman's numbers.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 09:57 AM
0

I will have to disagree a little. I think women in "general" are less capable of separating love from sex, than men are.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/20 06:57 AM
8

I think he was responding to poster who advanced the concept that if a woman is really into you, then the sex will be good, moreso than the situation with the OP.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/20 06:55 AM
1

I have no problem with learning from anyone. However, when you say one thing with braggadocio, and then change your story later, I question your whole story.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 03:25 PM
1

I don't need to apply nothing you say to my life. I am not a youngster, and discovered the things you talked about in your post probably before you were born. I was curious about the title of the post using the term "quality women". It was your addition of a "sidenote" bragging about how you cheated on her, that was just begging to be commented on. Then you decided to change your story from what you originally said, and claim she cheated on you.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 12:53 PM
1

Your reason for posting it might have been one thing, but the details you originally gave about your relationship with the "racoon" didn't validate your theory so much, but instead made you look like an immature flake.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 12:06 PM
1

Like I said, you left out a lot of information which were important factors when evaluating your actions.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 09:02 AM
3

When I used to go clubbing, I never danced with myself. I thought the people who did so looked silly. I would always ask the girl I was interested, if she wanted to dance. If she said yes, then how long we danced, how we danced, her demeanor, would tell me whether it was worth pursuing any further once we got off the dance floor. I the girl I asked said no, I would just say "Next!"
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 08:34 AM
1

Well THAT is a very important factor in the story. You originally said you cheated on her because you found out she had a ONS in the past. Before reading the post, I was going to call you a petty idiot, more concerned with what she did in the past, rather than what she is doing NOW.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 08:32 AM
2

You make a very good point. Being older, with plenty of life and relationship experience, I often read some of the threads/post on this subreddit and think to myself "WTF is this guy talking about? Even when I was young and dumb, I didn't have those problems." Only when the discussion is about self-confidence can I relate. I remember a little while ago, looking at some pictures of when I was much younger, and thinking "Wow. I was very handsome back then. I should have been getting WAY more pussy…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/20 09:36 AM
6

I have been working for over 30 years. 20 years in the Army, and 18 years as a civilian(minus a 5 year break). I am way pass worrying about potential, or whatever else youngsters worry about. Wasn't really my point though. My point was, that being a lazy fuck doesn't mean you can't be content(or even extremely happy). Hell, I just went back to work 2 years ago. Before that, I took 5 years off from work. I didn't do nothing but "chill" and live off my retirement check the entire time. Those 5 yea…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 07:38 PM
0

I am a lazy fuck that does nothing all day, and I am quite content with myself. Also, pussy and money makes me happy.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 06:58 PM
1

For some reason you make the assumption that not caring what someone thinks about you, means being rude and an asshole to people. Those two things are not mutually inclusive. When I talk about not caring what people think about you, I am talking about doing what you want to do, dressing how you want to dress, working where you want to work, dating who you want to date, etc., without caring that what you do or want isn't what's "popular".
/r/TheRedPill17/12/20 03:32 AM
2

How does your examples negate what I said? In both of those situations, it involved people that could in fact influence his income or living condition. I don't know about you, but I am old enough to know when that situation applies.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 07:09 AM
7

This is the one I have the least problem with. Unless someone can influence my income, or my living conditions, I don't give a damn what they think. I have not found this opinion to create conflict. In fact, I am quite non-confrontational.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 06:30 AM
1

Pimping ain't easy. But it's necessary.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 04:24 AM
18

You are describing how it is for the person who isn't a narcissist to be around one. He was describing how it is to be a narcissist. So yeah, bad for you, good for him.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 05:31 AM
6

Dating apps have always favored women, in regards to ratio. I experimented with it many years ago on a dating website. I didn't create a profile as a woman, I just went to the website, didn't log in, but searched for men. Did the exact same search(same area, same age group, etc.), but for women. Way more men than women. It makes sense. Men are the pursuers, and women don't really need to do more than be available(and show they are available). Men need to seek out women, and need to go to as many…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 05:20 AM
2

I don't have to do any of that to get laid. Not only do I not need to post a picture, I don't even need to take pictures at all.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 05:03 AM
1

I am a different demographic, because my father was also military. I went to three different high schools, and the one I graduated from, I only went to for one year. So even when I was young, I don't think I could name more than 1 or 2 people from school, even if there had been a MySpace or Facebook back then. Whereas in the military, because of my job, I would see the same people sporadically at different duty stations throughout my military career. Now, being retired since 2003, I still follow…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 04:46 AM
3

If you have to have social media to live an interesting life, then I guess thank God for social media for those that fall into that category.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/20 08:46 AM
4

Your last comment where you edit is so true. I personally don't give a damn about "likes", who is following me, etc. It just seems somewhat childish to me. I generally don't give a damn about what people in real life think about me either, unless they fit into the following categories: They in some way could affect my income. They could in some way affect my living situation/residency status. (I am an expat that hasn't lived in the USA for nearly 15 years). The only reason I even have Facebook, …
/r/TheRedPill08/12/20 08:40 AM
7

Online dating is not a way to determine what someone is truly interested/attracted to. Years ago, when Yahoo had a dating site, I had an experience that brings that home. I was at a club, and an attractive woman approached me, and she was obviously interested. For some reason, the whole night while talking to her, I thought she looked vaguely familiar. A few days later, I was roaming Yahoo dating, and ran across her profile. There was her profile. Aha! I had looked, but not expressed interest or…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/20 10:06 AM
2

You can definitely get rich working for someone else. You just probably won't get "wealthy" working for someone else. As the comedian Chris Rock said years ago in one of his stand up routines---"Shaquil O'neal is rich. The guy that signs his check is wealthy."
/r/TheRedPill22/11/20 09:23 AM
3

Based on 2017 data, the average age for men to have children is 30. Men don't have a "biological clock" like women do, and can father children well past the age that women would even be able to. So although I haven't seen any surveys asking the question, the data regarding average age of fatherhood, would indicate that men are not having children at older ages. The are perfectly capable of doing so, but they aren't. Which leads me to conclude, the majority of men over 40 don't want to have child…
/r/TheRedPill22/11/20 08:55 AM
-3

He was 43 and she was 40. If man is 43, there is a good chance he doesn't really care about having children. If the father isn't in the picture(for whatever reason), if you raise them, then they are your child. Or as my mom use to say(who was actually my "step" mother, but I never called her anything but mom, because my biological mom died when I was a toddler), "If you feed them long enough, they start to look like you." My daughter, although not my biological daughter, remains my daughter to t…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/20 07:07 AM
3

Black men aren't "leaving" black women. The majority aren't married to begin with. The days are long gone where if you got a girl pregnant, you married her. Heck, those days were gone by the time I turned 18 back in the 80s. In 1970 the out of wedlock pregnancy rate was 24% for blacks and and 3% for whites. By 1990 it was 64% for blacks and 18% for whites.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/20 08:35 AM
7

Depends on the state(or the country) you are married in. I have been married more than once. Until the last marriage, I didn't have anything to take. For my last marriage, all my property was owned before marriage, so wasn't considered marital property in my state. My last wife only got what I chose to give her(which was the mini-van). My state, also doesn't award alimony unless the spouse is mentally or physically incapable of working and earning enough to take care of themselves. In fact, unti…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/20 07:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter