TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sha742 Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by sha742 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The average kid costs $1134.26/mo ($245,000 in 2013 dollars to raise to 18). Child support from the average person doesn't cover that. Not that it should, but it's just not profitable to have children and then leech off the non-guardian parent. I also don't understand how the system creates a financial incentive for women to refuse visitation rights even in the short-run. Baby-sitting is more expensive than the amount of child support one would earn per those hours, so there's actually a financi…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:15 AM
1

How rich do you think the mother is/how much is child support if you think only 10% is spent on the kid? I used CA data for income and a child support calculator and the number seems pretty hard to abuse unless the mom's getting significant support from her family and friends.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:54 PM
1

What do you mean child support doesn't go to the kid-- are you upset that we're literally not giving a 3 year-old cash? Child support goes to the guardian who then spends money on the kid. There's literally not another way that could operate unless the person paying child support gives the money to the state and the guardian of the kid just gets coupons for diapers/formula/food. Which could work I guess but there's a shit ton of lost efficiency there.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:07 PM
-4

There seems to be a lot of confusion who the child support is even for, which is odd given that the answer is in the name. The charming idea of 'financial abortion' plunges more of the next generation into childhood poverty. I say this as a man who enjoys his random flings: I don't give a shit about 'fairness' when it comes to men's reproductive rights. My thoughts are with the kid, not the father's discretionary income.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:47 AM
1

Hm. Well, chances are they'll mention it in a class dedicated about her.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:10 AM
1

Hell, I performed with Bill Cosby long before his antics were public but after the rumors were there. You do what you do.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:04 AM
2

I still can't believe people actually think this, given our unemployment rate is about the level it was in the 1960's. A good talking point Misters bring up is the disposability of men. Being willing to risk Cheronobyl or a Triangle Shirt Factory disasters for an edge in an unprofitable market is pretty ugly. It's not red-tape that's holding back manufacturing, it's the Dornbusch-Fischer-Samuelson model of comparative advantage in labor/capital intensive markets putting very plainly that capital…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:35 PM
0

You know what's worse than working in a textile mill in Vietnam? Starving in Vietnam. Let's not pretend that job exports aren't positive affecting millions of foreign families just because outsourcing has a negative impact in the immediate for some Americans.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:11 AM
2

There aren't any. Departments aren't typically incentivized to help with others' bookkeeping. But, its easier to complain about non-issues than talk about the perceived disposability of black men, suicidal FTM's, or emotional stunting of children.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:02 PM
-2

That's just not true. Not to mention the related issue of the state filing against a man to recoup welfare money given to the child's custodial mother. Especially this part. The State's judicial branch and entitlement programs are from different coffers, one.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 07:30 PM
-2

There's a difference between arresting for unwilling versus unable.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:54 PM
0

They don't, regardless of what you're going to hear here. One, you'll need to have missed several payments. Two, the custodial parent will need to personally file against you for being 'in contempt of court.' Three, you either need to miss your contempt hearing (the majority of arrests are made here) or you lose your hearing by failing to provide proper justification for not paying. Inability to pay (job loss, unexpected expenses) is considered in-depth. We don't have debtors prisons...
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:21 AM
9

Or just honestly don't have a bias toward or against law enforcement.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:18 AM
2

Being gay is a sin male g-spot is located within the anus Yea, no homo, God. I call myself a (male) feminist but I still fight against things like Tender Years laws and I advocate for paternal leave. I'm in no ways unique. I don't like egalitarianism because there are no activist groups under that banner since it's purely an internet thing. People say 'feminism' is a bad title, and I might agree. After all, gendered terms just muddle everything for mankind.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:21 PM
33

I think misanthropic is a good word. Still though, chicken and egg-- he hated women for being 'unattainable' to him, and he hated the men who were successful. The root is in misogyny, since I don't think he'd have a problem with gay or asexual guys. Beyond just being a hateful little shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:33 AM
2

The child gets the money purely by a birthright, a spouse gets it purely by matrimony. Neither 'earned' it, which was your point. In the case of wills, yes, the money is given to specific parties, but if one passes away without one, the state 'does its best' to legally allocate the estate.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:58 AM
1

Well gee, how do you feel about inheritance then?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:18 AM
-5

lol her whole attempt is to say that women weren't historically oppressed, and that the whole 'lack of voting or sexual autonomy or independence' was actually a benefit because they didn't have to worry their pretty little heads about it. Patrick Henry has a popular quote regarding death and liberty. She's the reason none of you are taken seriously
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:21 PM
-5

Feminist reporting in. not use alcohol or other drugs—they decrease your ability to take care of yourself and make sensible decisions. What leave social events with friends not with someone you just met or don’t know well. the Don’t accept beverages from someone you don’t know. fuck. I wasn't aware that the best way to prevent being raped was to pretend to be 11 years-old. I think the male side is fine enough except that it's extremely hetero-normative and doesn't address the fact that men are v…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:04 PM
-6

It's typhonblue. Her brain goes to odd places to keep the delusion alive.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:54 PM
-2

I was curious enough about this perspective that I looked into some of your past posts. You have a clear issue with sexuality. Whether it's yours or others. Please get help. It's not a good mentality that someone 'needs' sex.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:38 PM
1

I like to think that as a guy I'm not so impulsive that 'instinctual behaviors' need to be constantly sated.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:21 PM
-9

I don't know how I can explain to a grown man the concept of false equivalency. "How come I can say 'I hate you' to a friend scot free as a joke, but I can't say 'I hate black people?'"
/r/MensRights08/04/14 06:40 PM
-7

The term 'punching up' refers to playful mocking of a power majority. Cis-gendered is everyone who's gender and sexuality matches. The vast majority of people who say 'die cis scum' are 'cis scum.' I don't know what you're mocking with 'all sluts deserve to be raped.' That just seems like a horrible thing to say.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:36 PM
-7

Because you notice when a dog barks, not when it doesn't. I've heard many times on MR sexually-deterministic phrases like 'all women have vaginas,' or 'there are only two genders' or even blatantly 'you are what you were born as.' The occasional comparison of Transexuality to mental illness isn't terribly rare either. I'm not claiming though that MR is worse, just that trans groups are easily one of the most oppressed classes and have as a result taken undue scrutiny from individual members or e…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:22 PM
-12

One, 'women advocacy groups' are not synonymous with 'feminists.' Two, quoting your link: The Michigan legislation states that in a custody dispute the judge must presume that joint custody is in the "best interests of the child" and "should be ordered." To make any other decision, a judge must make findings why joint custody is not in the children's "best interest." This is a high legal standard that makes it very difficult for judges to award any other custody arrangement. It is also a departu…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:27 PM
-9

"I'll take 'What is cultural appropriatism?' for $500, Alex."
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:01 PM
-12

Because women weren't allowed to serve in the military This isn't for the woman's benefit as it is to ensure that the child is taken care of. A quick search will also find that men who go to court for their kid win slightly more than half of the time. Women are often given the children without deliberation. This is fucked up due to gender expectations and is something modern feminists are trying to alleviate. Feminists are as much against single dads as they are stay-at-home dads. These laws wer…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:59 PM
-4

'...Fucking hate transsexuals.' Except we don't, as TERFs (trans exclusionary radical feminists) are extremely rare and only pocketed to certain congregations. The basis of third-wave feminism (i.e modern feminism) revolves around the abolishment of set gender expectations, which includes identity. The obstacles of this are often attributed to 'the patriarchy' which is always misconstrued here as 'all men,' as if we assume that all males are privileged or actively oppressive. Even though the mai…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:50 PM
-9

Why would there be a difference? Both have significant consequences and social pressures.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 02:00 PM
-17

...about being sexually-assaulted. The rate of false reporting for sexual assault is predicted to be about the same as any other crime.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:27 AM
0

No she didn't, mate. You've provided male issues and solutions, not anything the MRM has actually done.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:09 AM
-1

but you gotta give them credit for making it well known even though most people don't know about the involvement. Nope. No evidence whatsoever to support that. What made it popular in recent years is that Google partnered up with the Movember charity to advertise. You guys still haven't done anything.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:06 AM
-3

"Men's Rights" as the concept you understand originated in 1856. The complaint being that advances in women's rights were threats to men (go figure) and a collection of articles was published in Putnam's Magazine, a predecessor to the Atlantic Monthly. Attempting to stabilize a status quo that isn't conducive to gender equality isn't any points in the MRM's favor. What demands are made of MRM that feminism doesn't also get scrutinized under? The academic field of masculism has been accepted by f…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:57 PM
4

Fucking movember? ...Is not tied to the Men's Rights Movement. That's like calling the 'Race for the Cure' a feminist outlet. No ties at all. Feminists don't, they get money given to them by the government. By writing grants and pushing legislation. Which is kind of a crux of movements. Though I suppose I shouldn't expect y'all to know that offhand, considering.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:48 PM
4

Her self-entitled attitude to be loved..? I guess I don't see the issue with either image. Someone's partner is obviously their own choice. Any social pressures are more the observer's problem than anything else.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 11:23 PM
-2

I guess I missed that?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:36 AM
1

raise her kids from another marriage, Why's this one bad? Assuming one isn't I guess obligated.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:59 PM
3

So you're telling people who are criminals, or would have legitimate police reports pressed against them, how to act afterward to avoid the consequences.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:21 PM
7

That way she cant file a proper police report legitimate or illegitimate. What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:57 PM
-1

Yea, as feminism is an ideology and not exactly a subjective one, I imagine I have a fairly good shake at what is and what isn't feminism. In the end though, you won't tell me what creep-shaming is? :( On the offset it just sounds like a way to put down those who label certain advances as 'unwelcomed.'
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:48 PM
-2

You misidentified feminism, so I corrected you so you don't sound as dumb in the future. And I've never heard 'creep-shaming' used non-ironically, so I was curious what your take on that was.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:36 PM
5

Pretty sure a tenant is the whole 'free agency' thing. 3rd wave feminists are just about uniformly sex-positive. At least to the extent that they believe someone shouldn't be demonized for their promiscuity, or chastity if that's the road they wish to walk.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:59 PM
0

SoJ tried to say that the common stereotype isn't that women are frail, but that they're valuable. He doesn't extend past that. Stoic doesn't really have much to go against. Here's the thing: It's hard to talk over here. If I'm a feminist, I must be a mouthpiece for Andrea Dworkin. If I'm a feminist, I don't care about male rape victims. If I'm a feminist, I hate women that raise children. If I'm a feminist, I rip dicks off and bleed through my eyes.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:05 AM
-1

No where did s/he mention that men think women are weak/worthless. What are you even talking about, dude?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:40 AM
2

He's trying to make the claim that no abuse of power or manipulation occured, despite the fact she was 14 and killed herself thereafter. Perhaps it could be a poignant viewpoint, but the specific case doesn't do anything for him but underline the fact that he's trying to call rape 'not rape.'
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:57 PM
10

Why does 'rape' need to be put on this excluding pedestal? It was statutory rape. She was a (statutory) rapist as was he.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:58 AM
0

I dunno, men's haircuts are pretty cheap at a salon downtown.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:17 AM
0

I still don't have a source. -Disillusion -Me
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:14 PM
-9

There's not a single bit of credibility. He's pretending that he has any credential to call out the 'components' of equality. By building up a false premise, you can really direct to whatever conclusion you'd like. Why is 'disposability,' which isn't even recognized as an actual word, a necessary pillar to the aspiration of equality? On what ground does one get to say that men shoulder more responsibility than women do that does not point to the existent gender roles of women being simply frail …
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:31 PM
0

Rights =/= Morality --"Me"
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:47 AM
0

Rights are a measure of ensuring agency and cohesiveness within society. Where do they come from? Depends if you believe that rights disappear when they're no longer upheld, or they exist but are simply violated. If the latter, God. If the former, government. edit: Going through my posts? I'm flattered, but you'll find some of my best one-liners locally.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:41 AM
-6

--Me Oh man, you actually quoted yourself.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:36 AM
1

"He's actually saying the opposite of what he's saying because I think he's saying this other thing but no really he's saying this no really hey guys where are you going" --Demonspawn
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:30 AM
0

I've never seen someone get crushed so badly underneath their own citations. That was hilarious to watch.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:19 AM
1

Boom roasted.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:18 AM
1

lol It's college humor man. It's an anti-joke; no one's 'shaming' your sexuality.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:11 PM
-2

You can build up all your weird little variables to worm around the reality, but violating the explicitly given consent is rape. If it was misunderstanding then I'm sure the two parties can decide steps B and C. But that's not what the article refers to, and the parent comment's situation is clear-cut.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:41 AM
-1

If he continued when she told her no, that's five to fifteen years.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:43 AM
-4

Well I'd say that's assault and battery and rape. I don't know why y'all are so up in arms about protecting the 'sanctity' of rape.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:00 AM
0

It he didn't stop and raped her? There's a google search available for you.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:59 AM
2

Man puts penis in anus without asking. Is it rape? Is this really a gray area? Yes, yes it's rape. Jesus Christ, MR.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:11 AM
1

Thank goodness we have all those admins willing to be SRS shills.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:53 PM
2

Edit: I'm looking for explanations. Downvoting doesn't provide that. I'm sorry that it's not as obvious for me as it is for you, but take this opportunity to change my mind. The above is my complete thought process which I've laid out so YOU can see where the flaw is and tell me. Calm down, turbo. I just opened my inbox today and I have a flood of 'feminism rah rah rah' to sort through. Skimming your post though let's start with this one just because it's been a canned argument so I have my cann…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:45 PM
1

I really don't understand what goggles you're viewing this from. The metaphor he used was 'being raped is like getting hit by a car when crossing the street without looking.' This implies the majority of the blame on the victim by not following laid out 'rules.' Which is really fucked up when you put the context in. I used my analogy to explain the 'risky behavior' of simply driving does not justify a lack of empathy if someone is wronged.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:16 PM
1

'Touching' refers to downvoting linked threads.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:14 PM
-1

Anecdotal evidence?? But that's the MRA's secret weapon! My opinion, oh my opinion, how it sways.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:41 AM
1

it is the view of the many of the core of feminists at the top, the ones calling shots, I can only imagine how fun you'd be at Pictionary. "What is feminism?" And then I guess you draw this picture of a treehouse where Hitler and Skeletor hand out mission briefs. There's two fronts being fought on the 'sexuality' front. The first that a woman's sexuality is hers to define, whether for promiscuity or abstinence, and the second is that women are more than things to lust over and how value shouldn'…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:11 AM
1

My favorite part of your comment is that you probably don't realize how encompassingly slimy it is to compare a woman's willingness to vulnerability to a lack of adherence to 'right of way' laws. The premise is insulting to men, frankly. That there's a primal urge or drive that so overpowers our empathy that women should do their best not to wave any meat in front of us, because apparently we're dogs. Women understand that wearing short dresses or walking home alone or the state of being drunk u…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:57 AM
-1

They're actually disgusted by sluts - they view sexually promiscuous (straight) women as traitors, as counter to their movement. haha, what the fuck. No, the point of a slut walk is just to protest the 'asking for it' defense. That's all there is to it. There's not a woman there that believes sex is evil, just that consent isn't implicit. It's these whoosh interpretations that make people not take this 'movement' seriously.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:26 AM
1

And it's not like I'm aggressive about it or anything. I know, but part of the environment is that this happens a lot, so they do need to be wary of accepting help because it can be construed as acceptance of an advance. Repeat this a few times a year, it can get repetitious at best. My ex was CompSci. Not much of an old guard at our university, but it got to the point where she stopped accepting help from male students that offered and just took all her questions to the professor.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:42 PM
1

You're assuming feminists would go around the issue of what's just a kid not being properly taught boundaries and turn it into 'he was probably assaulted by a man to be like that' and whatever else. You're assuming what our point would be, and then demonizing that fake contention. That's what a Strawman is.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:53 PM
4

And the 1 in 5 comes from a CDC survey. Bitch more.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:14 PM
-1

Because you could do a Wizard of Oz revival with that dancing strawman.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 12:02 PM
1

All it's saying is 1 in 72 men are raped by that specific definition of rape. Now whether it's as encompassing as it should be is really a backseat point since we're talking about rape statistics on women. More recent surveys that expand out the definitions of assault show that 1 in 6 men are victims. https://1in6.org/ Though this doesn't invalidate the frequency of women's. I wish it did. I wish we lived in your world when it isn't one in four, one in five, and it was apparently such a rarity.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:45 AM
7

Looks like someone's upset that reality doesn't reflect their bias. :(
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:56 AM
3

Their definition of 'made to penetrate' just deflates their male statistic; the 1 in 5 is still entirely valid. I don't care about your life choices, man. You're just not someone I'd feel comfortable having a beer around.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:20 AM
6

Bro, you're the one tossing aside empirical evidence for the sake of convenient anecdotes. To me you give off a massive creep vibe so I was providing you an alternative reason. As it stands though, the CDC... http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/sv-datasheet-a.pdf
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:56 AM
0

Welcome to MRA.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:51 AM
4

Maybe they don't want to tell you because you ask them creepy questions like 'how they masturbate.'
/r/MensRights11/08/13 09:48 AM
2

In fact, vulnerability is the only asset a women has. What the fuck is up with this place
/r/RedPillWomen27/06/13 11:38 PM
3

because over 90% of custody cases end up with the mother gaining primary custody. ok. despite 1 in 6 single parents being dads, let's just roll with this for a sec Thus, men should have the option of being able to "financially abort" (for lack of a better term) a child if they don't want the child. So men shouldn't have any responsibility whatsoever toward the consequences of their actions that affect at least two other lives because it'd be literally misandry. And if a woman doesn't want to hav…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:55 AM
0

(who has an overwhelming chance of being the primary caregiver) lol cause she can't abandon the kid during the incubation period. Sorry men get the shit-end of the reproduction stick. Oh wait
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:38 AM
1

I default to my own pronouns with typos, generally.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:08 AM
6

If a kid's put up for adoption, the State does its best to provide for them. If a father is the caretaker of the child, the father can put the kid up for adoption. But the attempt at the parallel was cute.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:41 AM
46

This is why MRA doesn't exist outside of reddit.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:52 PM
14

As downvoted as this is, RES says that about 1 in 3 voters here think this a good idea.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:54 AM
1

What's odd is that they could simply say there's a correlation between the level of the average woman's education and the state of affairs of that country as a whole. The better educated and better access to resources for women, the less unexpected kids brought into the world that add to resource division and less chance of a woman's path being inhibited. That's kind of the international women's rights mantra.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:58 AM
3

Sorry to reply so late, but feminists pushed for women to serve in combat roles which is paving the way to either eradicating the draft or allowing women to serve as well so men aren't the only ones that have to fear it.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 05:32 AM
4

What does this have to do with Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:15 PM
1

What sense do you mean decent? I don't know much about Japanese culture, but I know that in some parts of China, the wife alone is generally the house-manager/kid-raiser. Some important distinguishers, but fairly 1950's esque with gender roles.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:02 PM
5

The reason I so often stay away from this subreddit is because of the odd disdain toward Sex Ed. I really like your post because it outlines exactly the purpose of 'telling people not to rape,' but it's also described in enough diplomatic terms that the vast majority of people that read it agree. While I can't call myself a community member, it was nice to see that, outside of shallow meme-like posts, maybe some of /r/mensrights do understand the issue. Unfortunately, the person who responded to…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:27 PM
3

No, that'd be considered second degree.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:58 PM
1

Look at all you cuties stopping there. If you don't want to consider coercive rape 'rape,' go with the Centers of Disease control study that started with this question: "In your lifetime have you been forced to submit to sexual intercourse against your will?" But of course, rape is just a feminist conspiracy to rouse suspicion and fear toward men, so the CDC is really just part of a secret matriarch conspiracy.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:11 PM
-1

SEXUAL ASSAULT STATISTICS How Often Does Rape Happen to Women? One in Four college women report surviving rape (15 percent) or attempted rape (12 percent) since their fourteenth birthday. (1) In a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease control of 5,000 college students at over 100 colleges, 20% of women answered "yes" to the question "In your lifetime have you been forced to submit to sexual intercourse against your will?" Thus, one in five college women has been raped at some point in her lifeti…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:58 AM
12

"One of the good ones" is kind of a shitty implication.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:11 AM
2

I'm actually myself put off a lot by this sub. The mass decrying of feminism leaks into slur-usage which leaks to sweeping generalizations of women. There will not be a feminist that disagrees that selective-service for men is sexist; however, what some may claim is that it is sexist, against women. That women were seen as weak and a liability in combat and thus barred from military roles. They may argue that family court statistics are warped by the reality that Couples often privately negotiat…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:51 PM
2

White, straight males are the norm put forth in media, are the norm in office-holding positions, and are by far the wealthiest on average. Obviously, money speaks. A trans black woman with a fortune will have more opportunities than a white man who lives under a box. But when you remove the variable of wealth, other things begin to arise. One study cited by Freakonomics shows that "traditionally black" names like Jamal and Tyrone on resumes received much less attention than "traditionally white"…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:31 AM
7

means men have no problems to deal with And thus, some feminists are victims themselves to cultural myopia. I will not pretend feminism or any form of social justice is an intellectual medal of honor and anyone who wears it is elevated to a perfect state of self-awareness. I'm a Biology student "by trade" and I've butt heads with a Gender Studies major I used to know back in high school many times. However, what we do agree on is that privilege is a reality. It is certainly deniable, but it show…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:34 PM
11

Well, as it's an ideology, self-proclamation is sort of the hitch to it. But I'll bite. Modern feminism is defined with the assumption of two things: Privilege can lead to cultural myopia, which is the failure to understand other perspectives because one is trapped in their own microcosm. The mis-attributed quote "Let them eat cake," by Marie Antoinette sums it up fairly well. Contrary to criticism against feminism, people born into a state of privilege such as the group I belong to, are not con…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:46 PM
-1

The video consisted of a guy trying to ignore a violent angry woman who wouldn't let him be. What? She got near the TV and then he cornered her and physically intimidated her by getting in her space and kicking the TV. You people are fucked up.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:50 PM
-17

No they didn't. They were never classified as a hate group by SPLC, simply as an outlet of misogyny, and that had never been redacted. Reddit: Mens Rights A “subreddit” of the user-generated news site Reddit, this forum describes itself as a “place for people who feel that men are currently being disadvantaged by society.” While it presents itself as a home for men seeking equality, it is notable for the anger it shows toward any program designed to help women. It also trafficks in various consp…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:26 PM
-19

It's a shame when those people are actually called an amalgamation of hate and misogyny by the SPLC, but take what you can get, right?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:51 PM
-21

That's the advantage of an echo chamber, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:44 PM
-27

Kudos for waiting that whole two minutes to show everyone how you schooled her, mate.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:31 PM
3

Because eagle librarians are a dressed up term that claim to stand for equal rights but assume we're already there in a lot of aspects much too prematurely. I respect that this isn't a place for my soapbox, though for you to claim that the epitome of feminism is an acknowledge that there is still ground to aspire for, color me guilty.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:20 AM
5

I don't want to go into a pissing contest for low-hanging fruit. There are extremists within feminism. I could defend their POV because I understand the ideology, but it doesn't represent mainstream, moderate feminism. What I quoted above does. Eagle librarians deny too much current patriarchy, so I cannot in good conscience claim the title.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:29 PM
2

It's not entirely societal in the sense that changing social stigmas won't have direct effects. I addressed though why it was still somewhat societal in the last part of your quote. Ultimately though change needs to be done to prison systems to address assault within prisons. The difference between rape that happens in prison and what happens outside is that prison rape is often forced or forms of intimidation are used. It's 'textbook,' almost. Outside the walls though, rape can take many forms,…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:53 PM
1

When I was a first aid administrator in Occupy: Seattle a year ago, there were certainly people who fell under that umbrella with vastly different thoughts. I believed that wealth disparity was such an issue that government interference was necessary, and I could give you a full dissertation on causes and solutions. At the same time, the folks I was often dousing in milk and apple vinegar had stances much more anarchic. It certainly made for a camp of odd bedfellows, but ultimately it helped me …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:44 PM
6

Hey guys, just stopping in. There are a few misconceptions (or at least so I see) about feminism and what is a feminist ideal, so let me spread the gospel a bit here. Feminism does not support women violence. In fact, what makes it seemingly permissible in society is the stereotype that women are weak and therefore their actions carry less weight. Feminists do not like this stereotype and actually advocate against it. When we dislike domestic abuse, we generally do so not from a feminist stand-p…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:03 AM
6

Probably refers to the concept of rape education; feminists are very against the idea of victim-oriented instruction, which tells women to dress more modestly and be more wary around their male peers. Let's avoid that debate since I'm not in the right place for the idea. But still, her point is that most preventative cases put the responsibility on women to be wary at all costs among men, and that's certainly not right.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:26 PM
2

You also ran this story. http://www.newuniversity.org/2012/10/opinion/snark-v-snark-religion/ Do you believe in God? The soul? The positive and empathic teachings of Jesus Christ or the Buddha? Well, if you do, then fuck you. You’re an oppressor. That’s right, you read that right, you ignorant Neanderthal. You believe in sky spirits and ghost bodies? What, have you never paid attention in science class? Because anyone who’s ever opened a Biology or Physics textbook should be well aware that the …
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:40 AM
1

Ehh, I feel like the assumption that all women are seeking to solicit child support from men they date is kinda sexist.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 09:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter