TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shadowboxer47 Archive

View 5 posts and 226 comments by shadowboxer47 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Tradcons. Tradcons, everywhere.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:52 PM
45

How many pussies have you grabbed?
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:51 PM
3

My masculinity is not defined by how I treat women. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:12 PM
7

They're so eager to help anyone but straight men that they don't realize how much they are implying everyone else is other, reinforcing and perpetuating the gender norms they claim to be working against. That's a feature, not a bug.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:39 PM
1

Which is exactly what I advocate for. I'm not saying take away any choices for women. I'm saying give men more.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:16 PM
1

And don't want to use birth control No, don't misunderstand me. I think birth control should be the first choice. But when the birth control fails?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:10 PM
2

Men shouldn't have sex if they don't want to deal with consequences Fine, let's make it even. Women shouldn't have sex unless they want a baby, either. Now we're back to square one: making sure women keep their legs shut! Progress, amiright? Consistency is a rare jewel.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:25 AM
1

I am not American. Well, you're on an American website. I'm not going to argue what happens in some far corner of the world. I'm talking Western civilization. I support a woman's right to choose in those corners of the world. But that's not relevant to this discussion, which is based on US law. Would you pop a daily synthetic drug that alters your testosterone levels to have "consequence-free sex"? Yes, and men are eagerly lining up for the privilege. Do you know how many men want a pill version…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:16 AM
2

An abortion is not a risk-free medical procedure. Neither is taking ibuprofen, but that's as much effort as it takes these days to stay childless. Morning after pills are OTC everywhere in the US. Some countries criminalize abortions We're dealing with the US. Let's stay relevant. To say that women have consequence-free sex is bullshit Well then, maybe they shouldn't have sex if they don't want to deal with the consequences? (You see how this works?)
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:04 AM
19

It's a choice because a few days after a woman has sex, she can go to her local pharmacy, grab a pill from the shelf, and take it and not worry about the consequences. Pregnancy is a choice. It's why it's called pro-choice. If you have a child, you choose to carry and deliver that child. I know. I'm crazy for thinking the person who made the unilateral decision to carry and birth that child should be responsible for that choice. Insanity, that.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:55 AM
1

50/50 isn't always possible for various reasons. You can't just hand wave away all of the thousands of situations where 50/50 isn't feasible and say that people should just have equal custody as your argument. I'm not. I literally gave another option: if 50/50 is not an option, don't have the kid or support it yourself. You know. Being responsible. Can't afford the kid? Don't have one. Done. And then all of the taxpayers have to pay for the welfare of the child instead of their father. How about…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:54 AM
3

sex is not and cannot be consequence free with current birth control options It's a minor inconvenience with over the counter options that you can get at any Wallgreens. It's a heck of a lot easier for a man to say "whoops, I don't want a kid, bye" and just walk away from it. Which is literally the argument people used against abortion. I'm being consistent. Are you?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:52 AM
4

The downvote brigades are in full force.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:40 AM
11

by having sex pregnancy is the risk you take No, not anymore. This isn't 1890. We have morning after pills you can literally buy at any pharmacy. It's no longer this risk. It's unilaterally in the hands of the woman, and if that choice remains in her hands, it should be fully her responsibility. Anything less is barbaric and illogical.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:35 AM
4

I challenge the assertion that it's his responsibility to begin with.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:34 AM
8

I have 3 children. I am intimately aware of how much they cost. I don't see reason for it at all, because 50/50 should be required. 50/50 eliminates any reason to have child support. If you can't have 50/50, support them yourself or DON'T HAVE THEM. I think you have a very poor view of men indeed to think that all of them would abandon their children given the option. Most wouldn't. But the guy who had a one night stand with a girl who got pregnant shouldn't have to pay for that the rest of his …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:31 AM
3

lol omg I wish. Sincerely, A Texan who still pays child support to to an ex-wife now married to the guy she cheated on me with.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:17 AM
17

Or she can be responsible? If she chooses to keep the child, she should pay for it. Why should I be liable for a choice I didn't make? And not just liable, but a slave for 18 years? Ridiculous. Edit: I see no reason for child support at all. All this panic at the idea that a woman with unilateral choice should have unilateral responsibility makes me wonder if we simply don't trust women. Why don't you trust women to make the right choice?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:09 AM
7

It would essentially create consequence-free sex for men You mean exactly what women have? What's wrong with consequence free sex, anyway?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:02 AM
4

Contraceptives only pass the buck. In the end, contraceptives can fail and we're still back to the same position. Paternal choice is the only way.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:00 AM
13

I don't see that as fair, as it creates a situation with a very easy 'out' for the man. No, it just makes it just as easy as the woman. Women now can do just that and walk away. All this is is extending the same courtesy to men. It's equality.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:00 AM
9

if it's born then it deserves the support of both parents for 18 years. Bullshit. A child is not born in a vacuum. In the United States, if a child is born, it is because the mother--and only the mother--chose to keep that child. The man has no say. Would that woman make that decision if she knew she wasn't guaranteed bank for the next 18 years of her life?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:59 AM
11

There isn't a solution to this that is fair to everyone No, but there is one that is more fair and consistent. Paternal Abortion. Until we can have 100% safe child prevention policies, it's the only logical solution.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:57 AM
29

Women take all the risks of pregnancy Yes, and it's their choice.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:53 AM
2

Right, the attractive gay men are masculine, just like straight men, and bisexual men, and all men. As a firmly bisexual man, I don't think you have any clue what you're talking about in this regard. Liked some of your other comments, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 04:25 PM
3

A good looking guy can get laid almost as easily as a good looking girl. Holy cow, you have no clue...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 04:21 PM
1

how about we minimize the beast as much as possible? Ah, "Starve the Beast!" So deprive these services of money, and then complain they don't work.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:05 AM
1

And most people can't afford health care by themselves. It's why it's the number one cost of bankruptcy in the United States.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:04 AM
0

Wow, way to flaunt your weakness and fears, buddy.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:59 AM
3

My ex-wife told me she married me because she didn't think she could do better. It's the worst way to discover reality.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:20 AM
4

"imagine being born into a world where your experiences are not represented, where your work is undervalued, where your body is always open for comment, where your friends are routinely harassed and abused, and where this situation will literally be your reality for your entire life." So... uh... everybody?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 11:48 PM
1

"There was a survey of psychologists done a while back. They presented them with a bunch of different scenarios--things people do or say to each other in a relationship. They randomly switched the genders around. When those things were abusive, the psychologists were 50%+ more likely to answer that it was abusive if it was a man doing it to his female partner than the other way around." I believe it, but I would LOVE a source for this. My Google-fu is failing me.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:09 PM
1

That bullshit started happening when I was sixteen. And it's happened to most males here, I assure you.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:03 PM
4

Nobody said we weren't responsible. You're everything that's wrong with this movement: Unsupportive, unsympathetic, and arrogant. Why are you even here? Just so you can feel superior to others? At least I have the balls to post here without using a throwaway.
/r/MGTOW10/02/16 04:45 AM
10

Way to support your fellow men, asshole.
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 09:56 PM
8

but the reality underlying it was obvious to anyone with a brain Well, some of us didn't discover it. You don't have to be a dick about it.
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 09:35 PM
1

Do you think a poor Saudi male vote counts for anything in a country ran by princes and kings?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 06:51 PM
1

Do you have a link to the talk?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:44 AM
1

She IS moderate. You'll hear every AM show talk about how extreme she is, but she is Right of Obama.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:59 PM
1

Or they're reasonable people and understand that you'll never agree with a candidate 100%. Seriously, for all your talk about lacking critical thinking skills, you sure demonstrate a severe lack of nuance. I support Sanders for multiple reasons. That doesn't mean I agree with Sanders on everything.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:58 PM
1

If a woman is doing work that she finds meaningful as a gender theorist, why should she not be compensated comparably to a male engineer? I find meaning as a Beer taster. Can we use the power of the State to enforce my salary to be on par with an Engineer?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:56 PM
0

Another Sanders supporter. No, we do not.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:55 PM
1

Right?!
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:38 PM
0

Wow.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:15 AM
0

And you sound like my nine year old when she doesn't get her way.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:40 AM
0

I'm a 31 year old divorced father of 3 with a 6 figure salary. I'm very much aware of Iran's threat to the Straight with the current geopolitical environment. My entire point is the climate has been caused by us; that the entire reason these are so hostile to us are due to our foreign policy. When you prop up and topple dictators for your own policy, it tends to piss people off. Did you even read the fucking post, or were you too busy drawing up this caricature of me you had in your head?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 01:56 AM
1

The NSDAP was also directly opposed to free-market capitalism and was formed as an alternative to Marxist socialism, which has a distinctly international flavor to it...putting the "nationalist" first and the "socialist " second Yes, politics operates in a spectrum, but your analysis is still very incorrect. The key reason for the existence of the Nazi party was to fight Communism. The anti-semitism of the Nazis was closely linked to the high proportion of Jews in the early leadership of the Sov…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:47 PM
0

If you want to continue to create hostility in congress so you can have a President that can't get any of his desired policies through, sure, do it. That's Congress's M.O. When you state your entire purpose is to make sure the other guy fails, this is what happens. You don't obstruct all policy decisions, and then blame the other people for causing the discord. It's like screaming about the steam, but saying nothing about the boiling water. It's absurd. By voting Bernie in, we send a message to …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:30 PM
1

Since you deleted your comment about Hitler being a Left-Winger before I could respond, I'm going to post my response anyway. Do you know ANYTHING about the NSDAP? Have you done ANY reading outside the right wing websites that are now doing their best to make Hitler be left-wing? All because they see the word "Socialist" in the name? Do you know the history of that nomenclature? Do you know why it's called that? The Nazi's early days were spent fighting Communists in the streets of Bavaria, for …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:17 PM
0

Healthcare shit that even though it sounds good would never ever ever pass congress which would be required. I'm tired of this argument. So not even try? Not even try to do better? We can't do something that literally every other civilized nation in the world has? Not only do it, but do it better than all of them? His ideas with military funding would put US interests around the globe at risk as it includes cutting fundings for all operations outside the US. And what's wrong with that? I'm tired…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:04 PM
2

"Trayvon Martin could have been my son!!!!" - Obama, inserting himself into a local crime issue to play the race card before the 2012 election Come on, be honest. It wasn't "local" by that point, and he was showing empathy as a father.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:54 PM
1

You've got to be kidding me. Bernie isn't a "National Socialist." He's a moderate Liberal by European standards, and certainly not right-wing enough to even be in the same LEAGUE as the Nazis. You belong on /r/badpolitics
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:52 PM
1

Trump will never win a general election.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:49 PM
1

Thank you so much for this. As a father of a trans daughter, it breaks my heart to see all the trans-hate on here.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:44 PM
2

I agree with most of what you're saying. But keep in mind there is only one "study" that support the 1 - 5 statistic and it is highly flawed. That which can be presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:44 PM
3

You can keep building up straw-men and knocking them down, or you can address my original points. If you want to classify the entire human existence of the sexual pursuit, whether in the form of courtship, buying a woman a drink, etc., all of which can be construed as "pressure", to be morally wrong in light of your postmodern bullshit, be my guest. It's just not topical to the discussion. Your ethical judgments on sexual pursuit are irrelevant. What is relevant is whether or not they are rape. …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:10 PM
1

Why would you not be "looking" for this debate? This is literally the answer. Stats don't take these things into account, and that's very important. My ex-wife gets 30% of my NET income on top of a bunch of other shit. Because of the amount of money she gets, she doesn't have to work. As such, she is effectively unemployed, but living better than I am!
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:20 PM
4

Women might do better being taught how not to be manipulated They need to stop being treated like children. They need to be responsible for their own feelings and learn to verbalize their wishes.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:07 PM
4

A lot of time women feel really strong shame and embarrassment about having been pressured or guilted or forced into sex pressured guilted forced One of these things is not like the other. One of these things is not the same. Maybe they should be responsible for their own feelings and actions? In the end, they still accepted it. REGRET SEX IS NOT RAPE.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:05 PM
2

"I thought that it 'wasn't a big deal' to pressure/tease/push a woman to have sex with me. Uh... it's not. That's fucking sexual dynamics. I know plenty of women who do the same thing. It's not a big deal. Sex is not icky. It is not gross. It is not profane. If somebody doesn't like it, they're more than capable of saying "No." You feminists treat other women like infants, who aren't capable of saying a simple word.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:03 PM
1

And Patriarchy Theory is wronger than a wrong thing that's wrong.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:58 PM
3

The you're a fool.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:21 PM
4

I don't like how this is portrayed, but I don't see anything wrong with their methodology. I find this very believable. Gender Dimorphism is a bitch. The Telegraph presented this in the context of Identity Politics rather than from a sociological perspective and as such only present the male aspect. Don't get me wrong, their study seems solid. I just don't think it presents an appropriate context to gender dynamics. The reality is, this is an excellent example of gender dimorphism. In general, w…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:09 PM
7

You can always make more children. Seriously? Are you some kind of psychopath? You clearly do not have children.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:26 AM
4

If you have children, as is the case most of the time, that is not an option. If I didn't have children, I would have told my ex to fuck off and gone off the map. They hold the children hostage.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:39 PM
1

If you didn't want the baby, you could use contraceptive, condoms, or just not have sex. It doesn't work that way. Real life never works that way. Abortion is not new. Abortion has been happening for thousands of years. And making it illegal will not stop or even slow the rate.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:34 PM
2

I'm bisexual. Have been as long as I can remember. I never really understood this argument. If being gay is a choice, who the fuck cares? How should that affect any right I have to love another human being?
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:19 PM
1

fact, the opposite is true, parents have a responsibility for their daughters outcome until they become their husbands problem. Sons on the other hand are obliged to care for their parents. I've heard this a lot. Very interesting. Do you have any source for this? Would like to tuck it away for later.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:48 PM
1

I'm assuming you live in the Third World and could tell us otherwise?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:48 PM
3

Not censoring a board has its ups and downs. However, I usually find comments like these ultimately end up way in the negative.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:47 PM
5

Exactly. I never agree with 100% of what a candidate says. But he's the first candidate that I've agreed with 90%.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:38 AM
2

A similar work, EAT, PRAY, LOVE pretty much destroyed my marriage.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:53 PM
1

And there's never been a worse time to be a man or a boy. The millions dead in both World Wars disagree with you.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:49 PM
6

I agree. But many men don't realize that, and women sure as hell don't want other men to realize it. To such women, having a pussy is enough.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:01 PM
4

but no indication that they bring anything to it. That's because they have the pussy and they fucking know it.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:41 PM
4

I've slept with over 25 women since Jan 1. . . I'm the 1%. I think you might be surprised at how many men on this subreddit would look at this and have zero desire in achieving these results.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:40 PM
9

Being tall isn't a privilege, it's a goddamn curse! Cry me a river. As a 5'8" man, I would gladly take your curse any fucking day of the week.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 05:39 PM
1

When capitalism happens, the inevitable outcome is Fascism. That's how you sound.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:00 PM
2

Wouldn't you agree that at one point the United States was pretty much a patriarchy. No. An oligarchy, certainly. But not a patriarchy. .01% made up the ruling class, who were white men. But the vast majority of men could not vote, or were enslaved and also lacked a voice.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:03 PM
23

Hitting that 30's wall is hard ;)
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:17 PM
2

feelz > reelz amiright?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:06 PM
8

Hypoagency.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:58 PM
1

Can confirm. Happened to me. :(
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:42 PM
6

Quite a few, and I've watched them all. But she's been doing mostly Honey Badger stuff lately, and it's not the same. I just can't listen to it. It's difficult to understand and I feel like it's a lot of rambling.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:14 AM
6

I wish she would make more.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:15 PM
1

As opposed to?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 03:20 PM
1

3-day hospital stay. Jesus, where they hell were you looking? I was in and out the same day.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:44 PM
1

I'm digging in for the civil war that I think is rising on the left. It's not just the Left. Look at the GOP, for god's sake. That's a tug-of-war if I ever saw one.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:39 PM
1

The fact that there are a substantial number of Progressives on this subreddit and other groups is the answer to your question. I'm not going to throw the baby out with the bathwater because the extreme of my group are SJW any more than you're going to abandon what you believe because crazy right wing religious people identify with it. Stop trying to pigeonhole people with litmus tests about their activism and their beliefs. All this does is divide us. If we're all against unfair legislation and…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:34 PM
2

I fight for Men's Rights and I have a 6 year old daughter who identifies as a transexual (m2f). You have no idea of what you speak. Shame on you. My daughter comes to me at 4 years old and tells me she hates her penis, and wish she could cut it off. She has been consistently identifying and dressing as a girl for years now. And considering toddlers and kids her age can't be consistent on even the fucking foods they like, that's quite an accomplishment. Gender dysphoria is real.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:34 PM
2

Libertarian Socialist?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:00 PM
4

I don't know, man. Women can have a keen sense of smell. My girlfriend can smell Old Spice on me in the evening after I showered with it in the morning.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:24 PM
1

I bet you $25 that I can ask a legitimate question to /r/AskFeminists and I will be banned. If my question challenges the validity of feminism in any capacity, it will be banned. I've seen it time and time again. Want to take me up on it?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:41 PM
2

And the rules are not to challenge the narrative. Seems mighty convenient.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:15 AM
2

I wish I could give this gold. Well said.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:03 AM
1

bleat the prog sheep. Seriously? Look, Fox News is horrible. You don't have to be a Progressive to see that. Even a horrible outlet is right occasionally. Maybe you should stop trying to be so sectarian. You can be progressive and liberal and still be for Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:49 AM
1

This is a gross misuse of firearms and completely irresponsible.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:23 PM
1

One word: Benghazi. Just keep posting her saying "who cares that people died?" The only people who care about Benghazi are the people who would vote against her to begin with. It doesn't help that the GOP House basically cleared the administration of any wrong doing (and rightfully so).
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:15 PM
1

This is from 2012.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:05 AM
2

Let me preface by saying that I am a Leftist. A Libertarian Socialist by heart, but a Democratic Socialist by pragmatism. I am for reasonable social justice, a good safety net for everybody etc. But I think this is dead on. Cultural Marxism has blurred the lines of morality at the very least.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:08 PM
13

Are you being deliberately obtuse, or do I need to point out every instance in the article where there is an obvious attempt to shift responsibility from her actions?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:49 PM
27

Did you read the article or watch the clip?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:40 PM
67

I'm a single father with 3 kids. Two of those children are twins. I also suffer from clinical depression. Never in a million years would I ever even consider cutting the throats of children to be an answer to the inevitable frustration of parenting 3 children. It disgusts me that ANYBODY could be sympathetic with this situation. She is a fucking adult. It is HER responsibility to recognize her unhealthy emotional state and to deal with it. Not anybody else.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:58 PM
7

I'm a bisexual man with a transexual daughter. I've never, ever seen anything bigoted on here about sexual orientation or the like.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:12 AM
1

That's an opinion, not ethics.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 01:46 AM
3

Sex shaming is outdated, useless, and outright hypocritical. A person's value should not and must not rest on their sexual escapades or lack thereof. My ex-wife and I lost our virginity to each other, and stayed steady for almost a decade before she left me for another man, tried to take my children and all my money. My current live-in partner of a few years is very, very experienced, but a fantastic woman who is absolutely loyal. These stupid, antiquated moral judgments on sex need to go. They …
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:57 PM
3

marriage means you get pussy without the effort HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:32 PM
2

For instance, I believe we need to raise taxes to rebuild roads and provide healthcare. It just means you're a dirty, dirty socialist! /s
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:20 PM
2

she's going to be out of the workforce caring for children while being supported by a man's labor anyway This is becoming less common. It should definitely not be a foregone conclusion.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:08 PM
-2

He probably means a place that doesn't dismiss an entire gender as a means to get a dick wet.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:45 PM
1

I just looked at your comment history. Wow.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:45 AM
1

Except, unlike feminists, we will tell you EXACTLY why TRP is not compatible with TRP, just as I did. If this place is so distasteful for you, why are you even here? We're a bunch of "weenies" looking for equality, after all.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:46 PM
2

I upvoted you, because I appreciate your civil response and it is topical. "Enjoy the Decline" by Aaron Clarey, where his basic thesis is that the world is going to hell anyway so it is futile to waste effort saving it, just make the best of it. I have 3 children. I just can't resign myself to our decline. Instead, I choose to improve our world for their benefit. And to me, that's another huge difference between MRM and TRP.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:44 PM
1

I have read The Rational Male. I have read quite a few things. Could it be that I just fucking disagree with you? this godawful SJW infested place is 'pure' MRM Then get the fuck out. Seriously. You're not needed or wanted. Our goals are not the same.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:42 PM
1

Many of us dismiss it because RedPillers are fundamentally opposed to actual equality. The vast majority of posts are about hamstering, beta men vs. alpha men (such as your "weenie" reference), and how to get women in bed. At this very moment on the front page, there's a post about what it means to be a "real Alpha", how a foreign bride isn't what you might think it is, how female friends can fuck you up, and a guy who can't figure out why a girl won't have sex with him. Many high profiled RP in…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 07:04 PM
3

As a fellow Progressive, I cannot agree with you enough.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:28 PM
1

No, but we can be the change.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:21 PM
1

Stick with what you know, lady. She would have very little to write.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:14 PM
3

We're better than this.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:56 PM
33

as a non-threatening beta The whole alpha and beta thing will do more harm to the Men's Rights movement than anything a feminist could ever do. Men are men and have value regardless of their level of aggression or "manliness"
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:48 PM
1

I was asked to provide an example or the crimes that were previously hard to get a conviction of. Right. They are after so called date rapists that often use alcohol and so on. Women are not children. They're goddamn adults. Nobody is forcing them to pour alcohol down their throats. Every drink they have is a decision that they made to continue to drink. If they make the decision to have sex while intoxicated, it doesn't invalidate that decision. That's why we punish drunk drivers, not let them …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:16 PM
2

That's a dishonest comparison and you goddamn well know it. There's a huge difference between my scenario and never giving consent to begin with.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:01 PM
2

No, but it's the only system we have. Abandoning it for vigilante justice is a terrible idea. We should instead work on reforming, which is the whole goddamn point. but you're telling me that the justice system is often right here???? Nobody is suggesting the justice system is perfect, but you're literally advocating for lynch mobs. If you can't see the problem with that, you have serious issues.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:34 PM
2

A person is a rapist if they raped someone People who freeze and don't actually say no, for example. Repeat after me: That is not rape. Let's try it again: That is NOT rape. Rape is by definition withdrawing consent. If a person does NOT withdraw consent, then it's sex they regret. This is LITERALLY advocating for people to be put in prison for decades because a woman changed her mind mid coitus, did not tell their partner about it, and decided to press charges. This is treating women like incap…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:32 PM
2

I believe women are adults and capable of making their own decisions. A woman has free agency. She is not a child. She can say no to drinking more. If she chooses to drink more, that's her responsibility. Anything less than that is to treat a woman like a child, which is incredibly mysogenistic. And yes, a man who does that is an asshole, but that's a far cry from being a rapist.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:48 AM
17

Really? He literally forced her to drink? She possessed no free agency at all? Are all women children to you?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:01 AM
8

Constantly bringing up left vs. right is part of the problem. Men's Rights is NOT a right-wing sub. It's supposed to be apolitical.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:59 AM
1

I've been too busy to bother posting about stuff, that's all. And we aren't? Take your self-righteous bitch-fest elsewhere, then.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:08 AM
3

Maybe I'll try again, life has been bananas so... So, what's the deal, you're going to sit around demanding everyone do this for you, while doing nothing yourself? Have you all turned into feminists? What the actual fuck? The hypocrisy is stunning, I suggest you adult the fuck up. If you cannot better yourself, you have no place demanding it of others.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:14 PM
0

Jesus CHRIST, not everything is about evil socialism and librillz. Rand is a hack with a shallow understanding of the human condition. She is not somebody I would throw around with pride.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:48 PM
3

Where men still typically have it as bad or worse in all of those nations Acknowledging the hardship of one group doesn't invalidate the hardships of another. It's not a contest. First wave feminism is absolutely needed in those places.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:42 PM
2

Reddit is either being manipulated, or it is an extremely unrepresentative place. http://0-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/a/image/1400/12/1400129922570.jpg
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:40 PM
1

I'm not sure how it works from a state by state basis. Unless the law has changed, I know in Texas it's something they don't have a choice in.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:30 PM
1

Any domestic partner of yours can be on your health insurance. Just tell them you want to add them.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:53 PM
2

It's not a goal to abolish marriage, because marriage isn't the problem. The problem is how divorce is inherently disadvantageous to men. If you fix that and made the risk offerings equitable, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. In short, marriage is a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:18 PM
2

I'm simply pointing out that, objectively speaking, the "benefits" are pretty debatable, if not laughable. A single line in customs? Waiting a few weeks to change your last name? Be honest with yourself and ask if these are really compelling, which I believe to be essential to my entire point. Telling me things you can do while married isn't in of itself an inherent advantage.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:28 PM
2

Valid in comparison to what? You can have some minor inconveniences or you can risk your livelihood. You're not really building a compelling argument, here. And what am I to provide? Are you denying that men take a huge proportion of risk in the legal aspects marriage?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:15 PM
0

Simplified Tax forms for the family Together and filing jointly is just as easy as married and filing jointly. Easier time through Customs ... There's literally no difference. I just got back from Mexico with my girlfriend. Literally no difference from when I was married and when I was not. You have a source for this? Picking up children from the school. You can have anybody pick up your kids from school if you authorize them. Changing your last name You can change your last name any time you wa…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:22 PM
1

Both atheists... but she still follows religious practices. Wtf? That's because marriage is heavily in her favor. She gets a LOT of benefits. Why WOULDN'T a woman want to get married in this country?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:16 PM
2

All of which can be attained without marriage.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:13 PM
1

That whole thread made me so angry. You know what? Nobody thinks their marriage is going to fail, but it will. I never thought my wife would leave me for another man. I never thought she would try to get full custody of my 3 children. I never thought she would literally live off my child support. I never thought any of those things, but they happened. Men gain nothing by marriage. Funny how you constantly see this meme of "women don't owe men ANYTHING" but god forbid you flip that and say marria…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:58 PM
1

"Feminists remain silent on this matter." And boy, does that bother me, especially in the wake of the whole spreadsheet backlash all over the Tumblrs.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 03:50 PM
1

... Clearly you've never worked at a grocery store.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:00 AM
1

They go together like peas and carrots. Show me capitalism without cronyism and maybe you'd have a case.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:06 PM
1

Whynotboth.jpg
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:22 PM
-4

"No true Scottsman"
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:05 PM
0

This won't be popular with the Rightwing circle-jerk that seem to dominate this subreddit as of late. Cue: "that's not real capitalism."
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:04 PM
1

Actually I just take real issue with bad arguments, regardless of their conclusion. Except you're not even reading what I wrote. All you're attacking are straw-men. It is however, indicative of our solvency and the likelihood of being to able continue deficit spending Which is irrelevant to the point I was making. If anything, what you say further underlines my point. it is not the lowest in history I didn't say the lowest in history, I said lowest in MODERN history, i.e., post-war.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:23 PM
0

No, you said having universal healthcare here would be less expensive. Yes... It makes perfect sense. Your claim is it's the system that makes it cheaper. I'm not arguing there are not different ways to approach Universal Healthcare. What I am arguing is that MOST of them applied HERE would be less expensive. This comparison is no more insightful to pointing to a broken engine and using it as proof that horses are better than all engines. I gave you data. Now you're just burying your head in the…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:24 PM
1

Google is your friend.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:15 PM
0

Actually that's not necessarily true. I say that Universal Healthcare is less expensive than our current system. Your response is to compare two single payer systems as evidence that they maybe more expensive? That doesn't make any sense. By all credible standards, it would be less expensive. Actually spending was lowest before 1910 when it was less than 5% of GDP, and we had a few industrial revolutions during that time. Did you even read what I wrote? Our deficit is shrinking at record rates s…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:06 PM
2

If this wonderful single payer is so damned great and this country has been moving in that direction for decades, why is every medical procedure as well as insurance more costly? If we went to Universal Healthcare, we would be spending far less money than we're spending right now. Here's the financial state of your great state savior. Spending is at its lowest since WWII. But you probably don't understand the difference between a deficit and debt, do you?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 02:40 PM
8

The /r/TheRedPill is over that way, buddy.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:19 PM
1

Take into account all factors rather than just all full time men's and women's wages, which is laughably simplistic, and the gap disappears. I'm a little late to the party, but I have a proposed solution for this: Make paternity time mandatory for all new fathers. If both fathers and mothers take off time for their children, not only do we strengthen familial relationships, but we eliminate a huge factor in any pay gap that may exist.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:28 PM
1

I use very hot water.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:44 PM
7

I love how they came right out and made a joke about rape.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:19 PM
2

Honestly, I have not. But I spent good money on mine after reading a lot of reviews. Apparently, not all of these are created equal.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:31 PM
5

I have a fleshlight. I don't understand why you don't like it. It takes prep, but it can be a lot of fun with a partner. The key is that it needs to be WARMED UP prior to use, or you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:27 PM
4

Jesus, I remember the Fark days...
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:52 AM
0

That, and it seems that a lot of folks on here are making it into a right-wing movement. Every other post has a top rating comment ranting against the "liberals."
/r/MensRights14/05/14 10:54 PM
6

Declare oppressors, dehumanize & indoctrinate to destabilize & cause lack of cohesion, and use ideology to justify power grab. Or any politically charged group, really.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:55 PM
1

You are right, some believe in Lenin, some in Trotzki, some in Mao, some in Pol Pot, some in Fidel Castro, some in the RAF, some in the Brigate Rosse, etc. What's your point? German politician Kurt Schumacher (SPD) called Communists fascists varnished red. And he would be wrong. As you can see in Ukraine and in Russia today, "fascist" has become a by-word for any political movement people want to demonize. Much like how the US media today paints anything "socialist" it doesn't like.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:38 PM
0

Ah yes, spit on us untrue egalitarians from your ivory tower of Scottish righteousness. Hey, dickbag. If you had any reading comprehension, you'd realize I was talking about "true" egalitarians in contrast to feminists. Why don't you re-examine your own sense of self-righteousness?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:30 PM
0

Yes, it is common, but the NSDAP was not, in any capacity, a Socialist ideology. Hitler was anti-Marxist and anti-Socialist to the core, and absolutely hated the idea of abolishing private property. I'm not sure why this trend of relabeling infamous right wing movements as left wing has started, but it's historically wrong. Period.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:24 PM
0

They redistributed wealth No, they didn't. Unless you're talking about Jews to Germans. Aside from this redistribution of wealth is not exclusively or even primarily a Socialist ideal. It's controlling the means of production that you're thinking of, which is VERY different than wealth redistribution, which even the most primitive capitalist states do through taxation. there was the people's car Which never actually produced a car until AFTER the Reich. It was a front for a tank factory. The lef…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:19 PM
12

That causes many people who oppose what it is doing to see it and the left as one complex that has men in its sights. While I understand this viewpoint, it would be a mistake to lump all those on the left among their number. Not just a mistake, but absolutely foolish. Anybody browsing this subreddit for any small amount of time can see that it draws people from all walks of life. There's no reason to alienate people who have different political views simply because some extremists also identify …
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:44 AM
1

Fascism is a meaningless word unless being used to refer to the National Fascist Party in Italy That's not true. Hitler was very specific about fascism. It's state capitalism, or corporatism. It's about as far right as you can get.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:49 AM
0

No, they had ALL Socialists locked up. Including Democratic Socialists. The NSDAP was not, in any way shape or form, a Socialist movement. "In the years 1913 and 1914 I expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which are now members of the National Socialist Movement, that the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated." - A. Hitler
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:47 AM
0

National Socialism is the most politically effective of left wing ideologies and also the most dangerous. No. No. No. Mises is NOT a credible source. National Socialism is in no way a leftist movement. Richard J. Evan's 3 party history on Nazism makes it very clear that Hitler borrowed the "socialist" aspect for propaganda purposes, but was a far right ideology from the beginning. "In the years 1913 and 1914 I expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which are now memb…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:45 AM
1

And that's completely bogus... you don't get to redefine the political spectrum just because you don't like the idea of far-right governments existing.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:41 AM
5

I really wish you would stop making these issues left/right issues. They're not. Plenty of MRA's are leftists, such as myself. Just because crazy feminists identify as leftists doesn't mean all leftists agree with them, just like I'm sure all of you people on the right don't agree with Fox News and Ted Nugent.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:37 AM
1

and being a communist is being pro slavery. ... that's not communism at all. Please do your own research. Not every communist believes in the USSR and Stalinism. You sound like a nutter from Fox News.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:31 AM
2

He was an adult and she was a child. A child with little experience lacking in emotional and intellectual development that comes with adulthood. That's an inherently unequal "relationship." Yes, even at 21 years old. We should be blasting unequal sentencing, not defending this stuff. We can put whatever name on it we want, but it's downright unethical.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:25 PM
1

But we don't live in that culture NOW. We are not in the 14th century. These are still children, with the mental and emotional capacities of children. I don't care if her hormones are raging, an adult has a moral and ethical obligation to be the adult and not take advantage of this child. I take issue with pedophilia (or borderline pedophilia) cases not because I think most laws are unjust, but because of the unequal treatment between males and females. Quite frankly, this thread is borderline a…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:10 PM
3

I think this is debating semantics. Overall, could we all agree that this is morally reprehensible?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:00 PM
3

So funny. I pay my ex-wife about $2,000 a month in child support. Let that sink in. She literally lives off the child support. Why so much? Because even though she had a job prior that made decent money, she didn't now. I tried to use the "potential" income argument to lower the amount, but the judge wouldn't hear it. Fuck this country and its justice system. /bitter
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:10 PM
8

As somebody who had to fight for over a year to get equal time with my children after my ex ran off with another man, this article made me rage. I couldn't read past the first paragraph. It literally made me irrationally angry. ALL I WANTED WAS TO SEE MY KIDS. It's stupid cunts like this that cost me years of anguish and 5 figures of debt!
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:45 PM
2

"Underage sex case"?! Are they serious?!
/r/MensRights15/11/13 07:54 PM
1

You're pretty naive if you don't acknowledge that "the left" holds a variety of opinion and differences in belief, some of which can and do exclude radfem thought.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:07 PM
1

Are we really going to commit the fallacy of comparing right and left wing dictators? Why don't you stick with the goddamn topic? Not all those on the left are neo-feminists. Many of us are egalitarians who recognize injustices currently inflicted on men. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:05 PM
2

feminism is still an undeniably left-wing movement. Are you even reading what you wrote? Nobody is denying that feminism is a left wing movement. That doesn't mean that all those on the left are feminist, just like what you said about Objectivism.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:04 PM
7

You know, this is not true. I am very, very much a leftist. And I know quite a few MRAs who are also leftists. How about we stop putting people in nice little pigeon holes, hmm?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:45 PM
1

I think you missed the point, dude.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:08 PM
7

The cap is not really permanentnt and Texas laws are a joke. I just completed my divorce here. I have my 3 kids half the time and still pay almost 2k a month.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:08 PM
4

Did the same thing to me. I looked the doctor in the eye and said, "buddy, my body; my choice." He said, "Okay." :)
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:02 PM
7

Don't feed the troll! :)
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:46 PM
3

sometimes kicking me out of my bed A girl recently tried that on me. I laughed and told her to get the fuck out of my apartment. Sorry, 8 years of marriage with that kinda bullshit and I will never, ever put up with it again. Ever.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:03 PM
4

My marriage ended this way. Because it turned out she just got tired of me and went and fucked another man after a sexless marriage. And now who has to fight to see his kids while paying almost 2k a month in CS? This guy. Marriage: Note Even Once!
/r/MensRights01/07/13 08:53 PM
3

I notice the downvote brigade is hard at work in this thread.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:19 PM
3

Except that's not what she does. Did you even read the fucking article? She harasses people. That carries consequences.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:52 PM
3

Harassment != free speech.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:26 PM
1

Nobody is denying her right to have her opinions. They're just telling her she needs to have her opinions somewhere else. She can spout her shit all she wants, doesn't mean people have to or want to listen to it. Learn the difference, it is very important.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:54 PM
6

Yup, just like my feminist wife who is all about being "independent"... And living off of my 2k monthly child support.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:50 PM
22

Bingo. Currently me.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 09:41 PM
3

Where is this? I cannot find the link!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:18 AM
1

The bro-code is strong.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:39 PM
9

Or you could be my wife who, leaving me for another man, has said her staying at home was something she did for us, and consequently owe her more money because of that "sacrifice".
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:59 PM
1

I agree. It's just one less step to take.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:12 PM
3

Sir, I do not care that this was off topic. You are a gentlemen and a scholar. I have permalinked this for future reference, for the simple reason that I am sick and tired of typing it all out myself, multiple times.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 04:36 PM
2

She may not be the troubled one, but the fact that she allows this "debate" is a little sad. Not all opinions are equal.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:24 PM
2

recently divorced ... I wonder why
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:24 PM
2

Source was acer.us.msn.com. Honestly, it's a flash thing... wasn't sure how to link to it without going directly to the page.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 11:29 PM
1

You act like it's an all or nothing deal. Democracy doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 12:21 AM
3

I didn't say he was a leftist, i said he was a part of the left. You're splitting hairs. Is that arguable? According To Fox News and conservative talking heads, or according to the rest of the world? The former would have you believe he's an anti-American Socialist out to rape your grandmother of her private choices, etc. Reasonable folks understand that our political system has shifted significantly to the right. Using the rest of the world as a barometer, Obama is a corporate shill. Yes, but t…
/r/MensRights30/08/11 12:13 AM
3

You're still under the mistaken impression that the government would run the programs you speak of efficiently. The government is full of waste... In a lot of ways, the government is worse because it is allowed to be so wasteful. You're still under the mistaken impression that corporations would run the programs you speak of efficiently. Corporations are full of waste... in a lot of ways, corporations are worse because all they are after is profit.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 11:44 PM
5

As a married, successful man, I find your trolling to score below the usual par. Trolling used to be an art. :(
/r/MensRights29/08/11 07:11 PM
6

Why drag left/right polemic identity into this? Because it's easy to slap a label on something one already conveniently hates... just more fuel to the fire.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 07:10 PM
9

Your problem is thinking Obama is a leftist. At best, he's a moderate Democrat. The social conservatives are an ally of feminists They're against abortion, are the biggest advocates of circumcision, are against homosexual rights (lesbians), and generally advocate "traditional roles." [...]Tea Partiers are all much more favorable to men's rights issues. The religious right have co-opted the Tea Party movement. See Michele Bachmann as a perfect example, who constantly defers to her husband in all …
/r/MensRights29/08/11 07:06 PM
1

Why are you here?
/r/MensRights26/08/11 05:31 PM
4

It's a common pattern in the far left for some reason. Wait... are Anarchists far left or far right?
/r/MensRights16/11/10 05:26 PM
8

I agree. For example... Man with "liver failure" could have been a raging drunk. Beat his kids every time he came home.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:14 PM
50

Its good to see there's virtually no approval and/or justification for her behavior.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 07:02 PM
2

You missed one. 4) I agree with circumcision because I want my son to look like me. Yes, that's a common reason.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 04:19 PM
2

Please tell your daughters never to hit boys. Personally, I'm teaching my children (a girl and two boys) not to hit anybody. Why can't we just leave it at that?
/r/MensRights05/05/10 01:26 AM
11

Wow, I cannot believe the absolutely inanity being spewed on those responses. I thought her points were very well reasoned. Just blows my mind.
/r/MensRights07/01/10 04:42 PM
3

Apparently she missed, "if any would not work, neither should [s]he eat" (2Th 3:10). Disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/12/09 07:48 PM
1

Wait... people have sex when they're married? When does this occur? I must investigate.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 03:10 PM
1

THIS. I'm sorry man, but you need to get out of here. Now.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:45 PM
4

This! Cut off your bank accounts, everything you have. As others have said, if you're convicted you will lose all of it. Even if you're not convicted, you will lose all of it. Spend it on a lawyer to get your kid and, at the least, get you out of jail.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:42 PM
2

Already have. Texas is pretty good in this respect. Everything is split 50/50, including custody, unless she decides to fork it all over (unlikely).
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:04 PM
3

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:58 AM
1

At least I would get rich! Where do I sign up?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:57 AM
1

We do stupid things when we're young. At the time, she wasn't a feminist. You never know when your significant other is going to go off on another direction.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:57 AM
7

Honestly, there is a part of me that seriously wishes that I could. However, I want to be there for my kids when they're born. Divorce will not be an option for another few years IMHO. If things to get better by then, and constant abuse doesn't let up, then I will be done.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 07:52 PM
3

I should clarify that I do not believe in "patriarchy," so I agree with you there. I want to make sure all my children have a healthy view of their sexuality and gender. Thanks for the advice!
/r/MensRights08/07/09 06:11 PM
9

No, I will definitely NOT circumcise. She is against it as well. That's definitely one thing we have in common. Wow, thank you very much for all of that!
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter