TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shadowfalcon76 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by shadowfalcon76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Harkness Test it. Are you both adults? Can all parties involved consent? If the answer to both is "Yes," then nothing else matters.
/r/seduction23/09/24 06:18 AM
4

The complaints women have about AI girlfriends are in the exact same vein as passport bros: taking their dick away, and all the benefits of having said dick to suck resources from. Men not playing the game means women have to support themselves, and they are as allergic to responsibility as dogs are to chocolate. Sure, you could say "not all women," but there's enough loud, screeching harpies the silent majority of women aren't doing anything about that it might as well be.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:29 PM
24

Probably get mad that they got played as usual, then blame "incels" for their lack of judgement and using female privilege lmao.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:18 PM
92

Equality often looks like oppression to the privileged. A statement feminism likes to use, but doesn't like when it's used against them.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:22 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 01:50 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 01:48 PM
1

Just for the sake of my own edification, but it's been about 10,000 years since I heard the definition of TERF. Could you remind me what it's supposed to stand for again? Also, the term TEMRA is new to me. What's that one about?
/r/MensRights12/07/23 08:02 AM
1

That would still make it British, not American, since it didn't originate from there, despite starting as a colony. Some Americans adopted it, sure, but that's like saying the Japanese, Canadians, and Cubans adopted baseball, but that's still an American sport.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:03 PM
2

The difference is that ugly girls will still get some attention. The 1/10s and 2/10s will get some attention, even if it's not the quality or quantity they want. The guys? Attention doesn't even exist until you're at least an 8, and even the just barely. The imbalance in this particular case is outright appalling!
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:38 PM
2

If the foundations of all of those valid observations are shaky or just outright wrong, then yes, it does invalidate those observations. An otherwise solidly-built house put on a shitty foundation isn't a livable dwelling. The effort is there, but there's still a long way to go before a true understanding is obtained.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:07 PM
9

You have done White Imperialism proud! Continue to be a model Male Emotion Suppressionist! Obligatory /s.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:02 PM
5

To be quite honest, humanity hasn't changed much, if at all, from those days. It's just the technologies for and focus/nature of what we're hunting/gathering has changed. That "most basic primitive model" is still the game plan humanity runs to this day, it's just that we added 'dollars' and 'profits' to the list of resources to add to the hunting lists. We haven't changed, the game hasn't changed, just the equipment and the playing field.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:56 PM
12

How is a British term/concept considered American in any way? It may have been adapted, sure, but it'd be more Anglo-Saxon than American, wouldn't it? Either way, I was with the OP right up until they had to toss in buzz words at the end. Men and boys being emotionally stunted and malnourished is present in all societies, not just ones that have been traditionally white in the past.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:18 PM
0

It isn't whether or not she's beautiful that he's knocking. It's the fact that she's fat, and obesity shouldn't be a part of any standard of attractiveness other than 'Unattractive'. Obesity should not be normalized, and it most definitely should not be considered attractive at all. An unhealthy lifestyle should not be rewarded for existing, and we should not be holding it up as any sort of ideal to aspire to for anyone.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:07 AM
3

The irony is trying to preach about health care, but then let shit like obesity slide. It's one or the other, Shamoo. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 04:04 AM
6

Those would be the "dad bods" of the group, but yeah, I get what you mean. It's just a dumb double standard, as always.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:59 AM
6

That's because the person challenging the OP of this subthread put forth an argument that has nothing to do with what they were responding to and is a completely different issue. It's like if I said "I don't like spinach because I'm allergic to it" and someone else responded with "And how do you feel about cheesecake?" The challenge has nothing to do with the statement it's responding to, and is based on the presumption that people can't have selective opinions on different issues in government.…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:26 AM
2

Nobody is arguing against that? Like, why are you responding trying to act like you dropped a gotcha? I'm literally agreeing here.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:26 PM
9

That's just the thing. Nobody is. It's that there just physically isn't as many notable females in history that had the kind of impact on human history that gets articles written about them in history. Can't write an article about someone who didn't exist and it be verified. Now, in modern times, sure, put all the notable women in. Nothing stopping ya, nobody getting in your way. But the 80/20 gap of history is there to stay because that's how history happened. It's unfortunate, but women were n…
/r/MensRights05/03/22 07:06 PM
0

The "problem" is that there weren't enough notable females in history to make up that gap, because history was made by men. And I mean that literally, as in all the notable women of history already have articles, and yet men did so much more in the past that their contributions just simply outnumber women by orders of magnitude. You would have to make stories up wholesale from fiction to make up that gap, because human history was simply dominated by men as a matter of course. That's not a judgm…
/r/MensRights05/03/22 06:45 PM
4

Sounds like you don't have a mother, you had an incubator that donated her womb to birth you. Ask her about whether or not she loves/cares about you, and then frame the situations you're asking about in terms of you and her. If she still gives you the same answers, get the fuck out of dodge and never look back. Hard no contact, completely cut her out of your life. No ties of blood are ever worth the abuse you will receive, and probably already have recieved, at her hands if she's so callous to h…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 12:05 PM
2

Sucks that I'll be working on Halloween...
/r/seduction30/10/21 10:04 AM
3

She should be, yes, but I'll be surprised as all hell if it ever actually happens.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 03:36 PM
4

That's an incredibly weak argument. Both parents have the responsibility, not just him, when it's willing on both sides. If one side or the other isn't willing, though, then why don't both sides have their own way to avoid it? If women get to have abortion, then men should have financial abortion. That's the fair choice.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:07 AM
4

If women realize that they can't trap men into unwanted relationships and parenthood by getting pregnant against his will, unwanted pregnancies and single motherhood will stop being an issue because then they will have all that responsibility totally on them and them alone, and those kinds of women absolutely are the kind that will do anything to avoid any and all responsibilities. Men absolutely deserve the right to financial abortion. Your body, your choice. My wallet, my choice.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:51 AM
12

Can't have your cake and eat it too, anymore. Because of those very women who cried rape halfway through, now everyone has to put up with constant consent asking. The current situation falls squarely at the feet of those people. Sucks it's a turn off for you, but us guys have far more severe consequences to face if we don't ask.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:20 AM
3

Nah, all that means is they've invested way too many points into Cold Resistance, and have a shortage in another area because of that overspending. It's only a viable build when you only have so many other skills needed in certain environments. Outside of those zones, they need to respec, or they're just dumb.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:31 AM
3

"A person is smart. People are dumb."
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:54 PM
2

Reposting it because it's still needed and still true doesn't devalue it at all, and there are plenty of people like me who are seeing this for the first time ever, so kindly take that negative "thIS Is a REpoSt" nonsense and keep it in the trash where it belongs. Build up, not tear down.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 05:55 AM
3

Sometimes the simple answer is the correct one. There's layers of nuance to the surrounding ideology and community, but for strictly answering the question of what the word "incel" itself means and/or stands for, that's it.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:01 PM
4

INvoluntary CELibate. Someone who is single and/or not having sex on a regular basis, and that situation not being their choice.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:22 AM
2

I mean, that's the entire point of the exercise, to point and call out how bad the quotes really are either way.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 06:17 AM
2

So? How did things go? Don't just bring this topic up then leave us hanging. Inquiring minds want to know.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:49 PM
2

MGTOW means Men Going Their Own Way. Essentially men who choose to define themselves and their lives without that definition relying on women or the presence thereof.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 05:59 AM
1

Oh, I see it just fine, thanks. It doesn't have any bearing on what I'm saying, however, because I'm not addressing the video. I'm addressing you, specifically, and your misguided attempt to deflect me calling you out on trying to downplay the core of both the feminism and MRA movements by trying to first, attack the nature of said movements, then attacking me with a strawman so you somehow dodge owning up to you not paying attention. ​ No, I haven't missed any point, nor have I missed you attem…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:14 PM
2

This isn't my post. I'm replying to you who replied to someone else's video post. Further proof you aren't even paying attention to anything being said.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:03 PM
2

Nowhere in anything I've said in this entire chain even alludes to any sort of division. Are you sure you're even having the same conversation as me? I've not once mentions liberals or conservatives, Democrats or Republicans or Green Party or anything of that sort. ​ JUST TO CLARIFY, I AGREE WITH YOU THAT MEN MUST UNITE FOR THIS TOPIC. (Caps lock and bold is intentional, just to make it blatantly clear that's not what I'm arguing). ​ However, that being said, it still does not change the fact th…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 07:52 PM
2

You do realize literally every cause worth fighting for is political in nature at its very base, right? Because it is. Just because you don't like it, does not make it not so. Feminism was started as a political movement to fight for women's rights for the vote and other such things, but it was also started with the intent to begin grasping at power for women. Political power, educational power, social power. ​ Men's Rights Activisim has politics right in the name of the movement. What, exactly,…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 07:01 PM
2

Why, though? Politics are a major motivating factor in modern third wave feminism. Politics has always been a part of the discussion when it comes to feminism. There are more laws, incentives, and protections for women in the political, education, and social sphere than for just about any other group, and it was feminism that put them there. ​ You can't not make it about politics when discussing anything related to feminism.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:13 PM
1

By the time the accuser comes forward, the accused's life is basically already over, so the accuser should NEVER get any sort of "slap on the wrist" option. EVER. The fact they put out a false rape claim in the first place shows they have no remorse, and any coming forth afterwords is just a ploy to protect themselves only. ​ No, the only correct outcome to get things back on track is to make sure false accusers know there's no option but severe punishment for attempting that gambit.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:40 PM
1

I don't understand why that would be what is hanging you up, when the exact same thing is happening to innocent men now. Their lives are being just as destroyed because of the false allegations. It's the very reason why this conversation is even happening right now, because innocent people are being victimized because of "he said, she said" and tossed in jail over it.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 05:33 PM
2

The point I think you're not realizing is that it's not only the government action against the innocent man that's harsh, but the social pariah status that he has to deal with for the rest of his life that is just as bad, if not worse. You lose your job over this, now your bills have gone over, and yeah, good luck getting the government (or, heavens forbid, your accuser) to pay for them, as well as get your former employers to give you your job back. ​ Also, all of your ex-friends and family? Ne…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 02:57 PM
3

I'm pretty sure that no matter what happens to the 10-100 guilty people that go free, the one innocent guy will have some pretty strong words about having their life ruined for no reason. Say you're a law-abiding citizen, that treats all people with respect and equality (y'know, a normal person). Then one day, some woman that you don't even know accuses you in a MeToo moment. All of a sudden, you just lost your job, family (if you had one), property, respect, value to any friends you might have …
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:23 AM
6

they can't do anything to the kids That's certainly not stopping them from fucking this 13 yo boy in the ass with this. These girls (and that VP) really need to be held accountable. If we're arresting 13yo boys off of false allegations, then the girls can most certainly be put to the same sword.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:53 AM
22

You need to ask that question to a lawyer, but it sounds like a yes to me.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:46 AM
9

It's so the government can have a list of names in case they need to draft people into the military due to a war needing more bodies to throw at it that they currently have.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:49 AM
2

Then it sounds like you need to cut ties all around and forget about them both. You can't be in the kid's life and not have anything to do with the mother. This situation sounds like it's not yours, anyway. I'm sorry, but if I found out a girl was cheating on me and had a kid with another dude, I'd dump her, and to hell with any sort of financial responsibility for a kid that's not mine. You're setting yourself up for failure. "Doing the right thing" is only the right thing when you actually hav…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 01:18 PM
1

Thank you kindly. I was interested in seeing what the report had to say about it, and that it differentiates between rape and "made to penetrate" is mind-boggling to be sure. I'm fully in agreement that rape is rape, regardless of who the perpetrator and victim is. The double-standard is insane.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:42 AM
2

Yo, could I get a link to that info? At work atm, and would like to check it out later (and I'll forget by then).
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter