TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shaq604 Archive

View 0 posts and 260 comments by shaq604 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Isn't that like saying "food stamps incentivise people to not work" or "disabled parking spaces incentivise self-injury"? It's about giving help to those who need it most. American healthcare is a mess and needs to change to be more accessible. But generally speaking, being a single parent is objectively much harder than being two, they're likely gonna need the help more. Income thresholds are the most common metric used to qualify for benefits. Besides the benefits offered don't nearly make up …
/r/MensRights09/03/26 08:05 AM
10

So is it about income and not martial status? The idea of the govt incentivising single parenthood over married couples having children doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 10:10 PM
3

Yeah I can see why that might be frustrating tbf
/r/MensRights08/03/26 08:26 PM
2

How was Chernobyl misandrist?
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:09 PM
-1

I just looked it up, from what I've just read, strong painkillers can't be used on babies because they can be so dangerous. But the original guy suggested that it's made to be painful, but that doesn't make any sense to me
/r/MensRights05/03/26 05:24 PM
0

It's designed to be painful? Why would that be?
/r/MensRights05/03/26 01:44 PM
47

You'd be better off adding context (with links/sources) for why you think what he's saying is a joke or ridiculous
/r/MensRights24/02/26 03:21 PM
2

clearly their mental instability is what caused one of the worst mass shootings in Canadian history. I don't think being trans correlates much with mass shootings. They were a trans person, it’s not being talked about because they’re trans Weird to suggest that shootings by trans people are kept under wraps when last year Robin Westman's identity as trans was publicized as the most notable thing about the incident. It's one thing to disagree with how they identify but what you're saying sounds l…
/r/MensRights12/02/26 12:43 AM
2

when do you think things actually began to change where we have even acknowledged that men can be victims of sexual assault? From how I understand it in The West, things only started significantly changing around the 80s or 90s. Before then there weren't really any laws that included or protected men, only technicalities like "sodomy" (which even then was more about prosecuting gay men than protecting men in general). Scientifically speaking, researchers like Philip Masters and Lorna Sarrel publ…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 11:11 PM
18

When do you think men were starting to be taught that they were the evil problem and not the victims? If you're talking about "rape culture", the term itself doesn't even predate the 1900s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_culture#Origins_and_usage:~:text=The%20term%20%22rape%20culture%22%20was%20first%20used%20in%20the%201970s%20by%20second%2Dwave%20feminists%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20applied%20to%20contemporary%20American%20culture%20as%20a%20whole. Throughout history, men have ra…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 05:36 PM
48

This has always been the reaction, long before the more recent societal changes
/r/MensRights07/02/26 03:44 PM
3

Or you could look it up, here's the Wikipedia on sex organs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_organ?wprov=sfla1 Notices breasts only mentioned once alongside pubic and facial hair as "secondary sexual characteristics". Do you think wider hips, male muscles, and adams apples are also sex organs? They're not for reproduction: Development of the Reproductive System - Embryology - TeachMeAnatomy https://share.google/DHcMqsdH0G9TAl2hF But they are erogenous for both women and men, so maybe you consi…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 10:23 AM
3

They're not objectively sexual, only in the context of some cultures. Their primary role is feeding just like on any other mammal
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:53 AM
1

Difficulty shouldn't be the differentiating factor. If you think it's gross for one, your stance shouldn't be different for the other.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:51 AM
1

I asked for your best example of currently existing patriarchy in the western world and you gave me AI slop. I already told you it's not AI, just because I did you a favour by breaking my points down for you to more easily understand doesn't mean I needed AI to make it. But in a marriage they are a team and not working against each other. Exactly, so they should BOTH have the option to focus on their career or their family, instead the choice was made for them. How can you not understand that th…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:36 PM
1

Mate, if you don't think The Doctrine Of Coverture is a very very clear example of patriarchy, then you're objectively not approaching this in good faith or cognitive dissonance won't allow you to understand. You saw research broken down to address your claims directly from different angles and all your cognitive dissonance could come up with was "it has to be AI, it can't be valid". (It's not AI but even if it was, it's still cited research). From your first comment it was clear you understood …
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:53 AM
0

The question was what a "patriarchy" is and if it exists. I explained how your definition of it isn't actually what is meant by the term and that it does exist. >Can you give me your best example of the patriarchy in action in the western world and how that concept helps us to explain and remedy those conditions? Sure I can give you a few examples: Careers In action: Data consistently shows that when women have children, their earnings decrease significantly compared to childless women. In contr…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 01:09 PM
-3

Don't you have a strawman somewhere else to yell at? Find where I've said that and your words might be worth something
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:25 PM
0

Voted in by more women than men in every single election since the 80s, in my country. This is the only thing you've said of remote value outside of throwing pointless insults and misrepresenting my point. And even then you had to split my comment in half just to harp on about "It's in the past, it's not relevant" when my point was that it existed then AND now. None of what you said actually refuted that men do hold most positions of power. Political, economic, and religious, and most households…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:22 PM
0

Such an oddly combative reply. I hope you're not a full grown adult if that's how you talk to people and deal with nonconformity. Evidence. None seems to exist, though. Historically men have almost always been the leaders of the household and communities. Vast majority of leadership positions are all held by men. That's not even evidence or even proof, that's just flat out a textbook definition of a "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights26/11/25 08:01 PM
0

Such an oddly combative reply. I hope you're not a full grown adult if that's how you talk to people and deal with nonconformity. Evidence. None seems to exist, though. Historically men have almost always been the leaders of the household and communities. Vast majority of leadership positions are all held by men. That's not even evidence or even proof, that's just flat out a textbook definition of a "patriarchy". Ah, that'd be the brainwashing talking, then. Yuck, radfems can really fuck off, yo…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 08:01 PM
0

Such an oddly combative reply. I hope you're not a full grown adult if that's how you talk to people and deal with nonconformity. Evidence. None seems to exist, though. Historically men have almost always been the leaders of the household and communities. Vast majority of leadership positions are all held by men. That's not even evidence or even proof, that's just flat out a textbook definition of a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 08:00 PM
-2

We agree. But I don't think anyone believes the "patriarchy" that you described is how the world works. It's not "all men have all the control". When people say "patriarchy" they often mean a system where positions of power are held mainly by men. Most people know that there are many other factors at play besides gender (which is kind of the point of "intersectional feminism"). There is a lot at play causing strife and division between people. I think one of the things we can do to help is by pr…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:44 PM
3

It's true that it's maintained by almost everyone but the powerful have more influence and ability to change it, but they maintain things intentionally. Everyone else is a victim of it and maintains it unintentionally.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 11:46 AM
-10

What do you think would validate your concept of what a patriarchy is? Would you need a longer list of disadvantages towards women around the world? Would you need proof that the world is run predominantly by men? Would you need the quality of life of the average man and woman compared? Do you think women are advantaged in most or all countries? I'm as intrigued by your hard line stance as I am by a staunch radical feminist. Neither lines of thinking seem rational to me.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 11:44 AM
0

It's absolutely not an average school, we agree on that. I just don't think it was supposed to be in a portrayal of an average school, just a really bad one
/r/MensRights20/11/25 12:03 PM
-1

Do you feel like they were trying to portray an average school or just a really bad one? I assumed the latter, imo some definitely aren't all that far off from what they showed
/r/MensRights20/11/25 11:09 AM
-6

just think about it the same people who religiously believe in adolescence also support the movie cuties Where did you get that information from?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:11 AM
-15

What do you think was unrealistic about it?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:10 AM
3

Yeah something along those lines. "It perpetuates men's objectification of us", "it places value only on our bodies", "it fosters spaces for men to mistreat us", "it perpetuates male violence against women" .etc. Some of them take a really hard line stance against it. It seems like a real point of contention amongst them between the "my body, my choice, sex empowerment" group and the "you make us look bad and gratify toxic men" group.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:58 PM
5

If you're talking about the sub that I think you are, they criticize and complain about porn and sex work all the time. The opinions do vary but from what I've seen a lot of them see it as a bad and regressive thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:12 PM
-3

I just tried it on Gemini and it wrote both stories
/r/MensRights02/11/25 05:00 PM
0

You say that but stuff like paternity leave only became a thing after women were given time off to spend raising their kids, when it originated it was just a gender-neutral maternity leave. The reason paternity leave is shorter in most countries is because of gender roles/societal narratives of fathers being less present or interested in child rearing (which is something feminists and MRA have been trying to challenge and get rid of). I don't blame you for being sceptical but wanting to prevent …
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:26 PM
1

Bruh, your first link isn't involving youth in prison, it's youth in general. Social workers can assign support with therapy, social workers work with juvenile offenders -> social workers can give kids in prison access to therapy. As is the second link. Youth Justice Services help kids in the justice system -> they help kids in and out of prison. It should be clear to see how these things demonstrate therapy is accessible in some prisons, but in case you still can't understand here's a direct an…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:04 PM
1

I know for a fact it isn't, because I personally went through "the system". How can you say you've been through the system but not know that Juvenile offenders can be given social workers and other resources for support? How can you deny that therapy is used in prisons (especially juvenile prison) when you have Google right there? I personally know social workers but even if I didn't I'm still able to look stuff up. If you wanna argue that there should be MORE psychological help in detention cen…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:54 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:53 PM
1

.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 04:53 PM
1

I assume you have that same outlook on all the men who kill themselves in prison. They're babies and can't handle the consequences of their actions. You have no sympathy so there's no point to be made with you.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:06 PM
1

Yeah, boys and men self harm at a lower rate but it doesn't mean that they don't also suffer and need help. Men commit suicide at a much higher rate, so it's clear things need to change. I can only hope that the benefits of this current change are made clear as soon as possible so that more boys are sent to places where they can be helped and rehabilitated.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:03 PM
0

So your solution to the huge rates of self-harming in prison is therapy, you don't think therapy is one of the first things that have been attempted in prisons? Especially juvenile prisons... Should I keep naming more? You can name as many as you want, they've all been attempted in some form or another in all kinds of correctional facilities. Seriously, if you don't think therapy has been attempted to help troubled youths then you probably don't know anyone who's been through the system. And why…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:00 PM
1

And yet they're exclusively choosing women for this new program. Why? I explained this before: They're a smaller population so they're easier to move. That same group is disproportionately affected by the trauma. They garner more sympathy because they're girls. Rehabilitation can be done in prison. It can, and sometime is, but this is a new program specifically aimed at rehabilitating people to join society as productive people instead of giving them a criminal record with drastically limited em…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 09:35 PM
-2

Yeah I think so too, it's true that men are punished more harshly than women in the legal system but I have a bigger problem with the punishment in general. I'm happy to see some change coming. This definitely has upset a lot of people hence the responses to this thread and my comments but rather than advocating for this to be done for boys, people are angry about it happening for girls first without even reading the articles. Crabs in a bucket.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:35 PM
0

Can you elaborate on the "psychological treatments"? I assume you can since you said it's easy. Then maybe you'd like to explain why they exclusively chose women instead of a small portion of both men and women? They could've easily just done 5% of the prison population under the age of 18. They chose girls because in the western world girls generally get more sympathy than boys, they were vastly disproportionately represented by the chosen metric of trauma (self harm), and the causes of their c…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:16 PM
-1

Then why are young men, who commit the overwhelming majority of crime not getting the same treatment? They are, there are boys in Secure Children's Homes too, it's a new system and they're drastically increasing its numbers. Also, this won't reduce crime, it'll increase it. Going light on crime will always result in these individuals reoffending Prioritising rehabilitation over suffering and punishment objectively reduces crime. Just look up "rehabilitation Vs punishment" or something. Countries…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:01 PM
1

Short of drugging all the prisoners and putting them in straight jackets, self-harm isn't "easily preventable". But maybe you think drugging then is the answer, which I won't argue against anymore than I'd argue against any other fucked up idea. If you think improving living conditions is less ideal than drugging, then I don't know what to tell you. Male suicide is a serious issue in and out of prison and we can all agree that it needs to be addressed better. Prison living conditions and the jus…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:25 PM
-1

Secure Children's Homes aren't foster care. Maybe you prioritise punishment/suffering over reformation and rehabilitation but I actually want crime reduced, not perpetuated.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:54 PM
-14

If your thinking is that this change will only be used to benefit girls and eventually women, then shouldn't an effort be made to make sure that boys benefit from it too? Right now the sentiment of this thread seems to be "the justice system is shit for us, so it should stay shit for girls too" rather than "justice system reform is good, we need to make sure that this initiative is able to benefit boys as well". Just crabs in a bucket.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:50 PM
1

Right so you're saying you don't care, okay.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:42 PM
-1

What excuse?
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:40 PM
0

Okay but who is "they"? And what would "caring" about this issue look like to you? There are advocacy groups for boys and children in general. There are also initiatives that try to address male suicide. Are you specifically talking about the government taking action or a larger societal movement? we’ll start caring about self-harm in women and girls Also who is "we"? The people in this sub? The people in this thread? Men in general? You don't have to care, if you don't then fair enough, I just …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:07 PM
-27

I generally don't like the justice system and how it fails to rehabilitate offenders so I think there needs to be big changes made. I think if this change leads to greater changes for child incarceration overall for boys and girls then that would be an overall positive. And it seems like this is part of a larger change being made. (But that could just be me being optimistic/naive) It seems to me that the reason girls were chosen is that they make up a small fraction of the prison population and …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 03:42 PM
0

So what happens with them? They're sent to a Secure Children's Home instead, it seems like it's a prison focused more on reform and rehabilitation, which I think is good. You’d think that they would prioritise the people aka men who are primarily affected by the justice system I think they chose girls because: 1) According to their research, girls are disproportionately affected by the trauma of incarnation i.e. they are 50x more likely to self harm than boys. 2) They make up 2% of the juvenile …
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:27 PM
-6

Women make up 4% of the prison population. Even if they were all released to make more room for men, it would hardly make a difference. And women have led revolutions before. I don't think this kind of change would do much to quell any kind of uprising even if it went fully into effect.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:17 PM
-11

The punishment is a criminal record and being sent to Secure Children's Homes, they're still a somewhat new concept in the UK. Hopefully it effectively rehabilitates them.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:09 PM
-56

Do you have any ideas or thoughts on how to better address the issues that they're trying to solve? (i.e. the large rates of self harm)
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:03 PM
4

100% agree, a lot of people just don't feel comfortable seeing expressive feminine men.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 12:39 PM
-1

If you believe you are in danger of being violently attacked, then by all means. If someone is annoying you by speaking without asking your father's permission or whatever, that's not something to involve state-sanctioned violence for. If a person is paranoid and/or abusive and wants to see a man suffer for it, I am also opposed to that and safeguards need to be in place to prevent that abuse. Yes, that's been my point - that there are levels to the dangers of catcalling from annoyance to precur…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:24 PM
-1

It's annoying speech, but that's all it is, and hardly warranting police intervention, like some overgrown child running for a Freudian Daddy because ones feelings are hurt. If all you see it as is "annoying" then you have a very limited understanding of what it is and what it can lead to. You simply think of a man calling a passing woman "beautiful" but imagine for a moment as a woman: You're walking down a quiet road at night on your way home -> a random man behind you whistles -> you ignore i…
/r/MensRights17/08/25 10:01 AM
-1

1) A) Catcalling literally falls under Street Harassment just look it up B) The link you shared states "It's harassment if the unwanted behaviour has happened two times or more and made you feel distressed or threatened." it doesn't necessarily have to happen on separate occasions for it to be considered repetitive. Even then I think it's possible for a single comment to be inappropriate shouting a slur at a stranger or loudly calling a stranger a "fuck toy" are clearly inappropriate whether you…
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:53 PM
-1

Calling catcalling (a type of harassment) "speech without permission" is pretty disingenuous. That's like calling shouting slurs at someone "speaking impolitely" or referring to doxxing someone as "just posting an address". "Jog on" might be an insignificant initiative but catcalling itself is an issue worth addressing.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 09:26 PM
0

The first sane comment in this whole thread, why don't they just read the 4-minute article?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 08:36 PM
1

Did you watch the whole show? The 3rd episode was entirely about why Jamie did what he did. He was lonely, self conscious, bullied, had unattainable expectations of himself, and was angry. Then was harshly rejected and acted out violently. The 4th episode even approached it from his parents' perspective, they tried to raise him as they thought was right but didn't know what he was doing online or what was going on in his life so couldn't support him. How can you say there was zero depth? Did you…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 09:39 PM
2

Action/adventure shows still mainly have male MC, even take the example you gave of Star Wars - most of their shows still have male MCs. It's just that it was so much less common for it to be female-lead so it stands out I think what you're finding is that before action/adventure series overwhelmingly had male MC but now things are leveling out - and because of that it seems like it's uneven (when in fact things were previously unbalanced so the change is jarring). To your point about dumbed dow…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:22 AM
2

It's a little bit more than that. She's been publicly sexualised and objectified by old men since she was 15, understandable if that messes up your development as an adult and skews your worldview.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 11:41 AM
1

I don't think "feeling like" you were raped is a grey area. It kind of is, that's how a lot of cases go that involve subtle coercion or non-violence. You might not even recognise it at the time but the experiences of both parties matter. Feeling like you were violated is how you start to reckon with it. If you you can't be raped legally it doesn't mean you weren't raped it just means it's legal for women to rape men in that scenario and you can't get justice through the legal system. That has no…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:51 AM
1

Lee Jin-Wook admitted there was no consent, both he and the victim said it. But it seems in this situation it would have required violence or intimidation for it to be considered
/r/MensRights20/09/24 05:13 PM
1

In this case it's being suspended for two years, I'll share the link when I find it again. Lee Jin-Wook himself admitted that there was no consent. It doesn't sound like it was a secret to me. Korea doesn't take consent into account in SA cases like many other countries do, from what I've read there needs to be a certain level of violence or coercion
/r/MensRights20/09/24 05:06 PM
1

All I know about this case is from what I've read from articles and message boards (which is more than most here or on Twitter seem to know). I'm saying this case isn't necessarily simply a "false accusation". As mentioned before - there is a big grey area and I don't think cases like this should end in jail time for the victim if there was no malicious intent. The first judge found her not guilty and this judge found that she wasn't trying to extort him. That, to me, sounds like the intent wasn…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:48 PM
2

The sentence is suspended but not indefinitely, she's still likely to do time. I'd improve it by making consent be a significant factor rather than requiring violence to charge for a sexual assault case. That's a good first step for their legal system. Especially if you care about sexual assault towards men since most of the time women don't use violence when sexually assaulting men Regarding this case specifically, you could just find her not guilty - just like the first judge found her not gui…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:36 PM
15

Acknowledging a grey area and that the case did not occur with the intent of extorting money, yet sentencing one of them. Sounds like there's at least some room for improvement with that judgement. It was admitted that consent wasn't given but Korea often doesn't consider lack of consent for these kinds of cases.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 12:07 PM
0

Yet, when a man is convicted of a sex crime against a woman by default he WILL be going to jail for some time at least.. Yes this is how it should be for both. The fact that women get an easier punishment (if any at all) is a problem and symptomatic of how society sometimes infantilizes women. But if we're talking about SA I think it's worth acknowledging that women are more likely to be the victims of it and that both genders are more likely to be victims of men. So that muddies the water when …
/r/MensRights10/08/24 12:53 PM
-5

"Boys will be boys", as I understand it, is used to excuse bad behaviour/lazy parenting. As well as the examples you gave: A boy hits a girl he has a crush on - "boys will be boys" A boy plays too aggressively and hurts those around him - "boys will be boys" Those are things that shouldn't be excused or brushed off they need to be addressed, but that's often how bad behaviour and lack of accountability is maintained and grows over the years. "Boys will be boys" or similar excuses HAVE been used …
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:55 AM
3

This is literally just leftist weirdos vs leftist weirdos And right-wing weirdos who are against trans people (and LGBT+ in general). This whole thing has blown up so much because trans topics are made to be so polarising. The talking points are originally right-wing fem
/r/MensRights02/08/24 10:06 PM
11

Wait nevermind, I found this post https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sphmjw/comment/hwhcxv8/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights03/07/24 02:39 PM
1

I never heard of that sub before, took a quick look at their top posts and they seemed like left-wing topics centered around men. Are there any posts that show why they're bad?
/r/MensRights03/07/24 02:36 PM
0

Fyi he also wrote this article: [My] Dad raised 11 kids alone. How will I cope with one? https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jun/17/dad-raised-11-kids-alone-how-will-i-cope-with-one "lesser of his two parents" isn't stated as a fact, it's how he thinks everyone sees him (and fathers in general). I don't think he's a misandrist or self-hating, I think he just wrote a funny lil article about his insecurities about his significance as a parent. I think everyone here jumped the gun and mis…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:40 AM
5

That's a very good point
/r/MensRights18/05/24 05:25 PM
1

Depends on who you ask, some would say the intention was always to displace them and destroy whoever wouldn't leave. Right now they are being killed at an extreme rate, that's undeniable. A genocide is defined by the intent to destroy a people. The fact that people have seen this coming for decades and things have been escalating for so long shows that there were signs for a long time or malicious intent But it shouldn't matter what terminology you want to use, it's clear that what's happening i…
/r/MensRights15/05/24 09:09 PM
-13

They couldn't because the world is watching. It's about justifying acts of violence, you can't do it all in one fell swoop - it has to be gradual or else it would be indefensible
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:42 AM
1

The men's rights movement started within feminism, it's always been about men's liberation and masculinity. You can split sub-groups and split hairs or lump them together and muddy the water but at the core of it, the goal has been to liberate men from oppressive structures. It's not a justification I created - it's an axiom of any movement representing and under privileged group. It's fair if you think that's wrong (assuming you also believe MR movements believes men deserve special treatment -…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:24 AM
1

But couldn't you say that for all large groups? When any movement gets large enough there will always be those who take the movement too far. When it gets too big no subsection, person, or subgroup can be a true representative of the whole. It inevitably falls into a true Scotsman fallacy but wouldn't you agree that what the MRA means to you would likely be different to someone else? (Whether they are within or outside of the group) Resources are limited and the idea is that they're unevenly dis…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:17 PM
1

I occasionally lurk here so I've got no clue what that's referring to. What do feminism, gender expression, and elites have to do with each other? Are they supposed to be mutually exclusive or connected in some way?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 04:05 PM
1

I might not be visualising the situation how you are so excuse any misunderstandings: If I was in a car with someone who kept getting into accidents because of other drivers, I would feel compelled to tell them how to avoid future accidents particularly because I'm also in the car and my safety is at risk. But taking my own safety out of the hypothetical - if they genuinely don't know why they keep getting into accidents I would advise them. But if they know why people keep crashing into them, t…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:12 PM
0

I think u/Shot-Camp-207 's point is that it's mainly from a place of empathy. And the fact that being assaulted is significantly worse than being robbed Everyone knows things that increase the chance of assaults, they're taught it everywhere (in fact people in this sub often talk about being villainized, so we know it's taught that men are dangerous). And some feel like it could happen either way no matter what they do so they'll just live their lives how they want. No one is being convinced tha…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 10:37 PM
1

What's the party line?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 10:20 PM
1

The whole feminist thing was always about both genders having the freedom to take on each other's roles and be more like each other without judgement though, right?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:14 PM
1

https://www.forbes.com/uk/advisor/business/average-uk-salary-by-age/#average_earnings_by_age_and_gender "Men earn more than women for full-time work in every age range" https://www.marketwatch.com/guides/business/average-salary-by-age/ I think you must be looking at very specific stats because most studies seem to contradict what you're saying - and it's common knowledge that women earn less yeah so unless literally anything bad happens to you, then being a man is about the same? Don't be obtuse…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:21 PM
1

I don't know where you're getting your stats from but generally men definitely make more. Maybe it's specific to your country or something but that's definitely not the overall trend. I don't know about you but if I was walking down the street at night I'd much rather be a man, most would. That's why women generally travel in groups when they go anywhere. other than no draft, lesser conviction and sentencing rates, reproductive rights, and longer life? That's why I specified practicality. When w…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 09:42 AM
0

Women live longer by like 5 years. Men being more likely to be victims is down to other men, they're the ones committing the violence. None of these issues are down to women, most of them are down to men - so being mad at women didn't make much logical sense. I can understand being resentful/jealous of them maybe but they can't really be blamed. Where are you getting the stats on men being abused and raped as much as women. That completely contradicts every study I've seen. Also, blaming feminis…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:06 PM
3

I think that depends on what you prioritise in life. If I wanna make more money on my own or feel safer on the street, I'd wanna be a guy. If I want to have loads of sex or start an OF or live off of someone else's money, I'd have better luck as a girl. Tbh maybe I'm missing something, most of the time when I see people complain about girls having it easier they reference dating and/or sex but outside of that I can't think of many practical ways an average girl has an advantage. I assume there m…
/r/MensRights18/04/24 02:46 PM
2

The thing is, that privilege only applies to a small few. Realistically speaking if most women could get by on their looks, so many of them wouldn't bother with jobs. A lot of his resentment seems misplaced
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:12 PM
-3

You asked why it would matter, but it would matter. It's a divorce case and that's a very significant thing to take into consideration
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:46 PM
0

But his intention was to kill as many women as possible. The same as how this woman intended to harm boys
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:45 PM
1

Elliot Rodger is the biggest recent name, he literally planned to target a sorority of women he thought were the hottest There are also the serial killers who specifically target women, Samuel Little comes to mind It's definitely a thing, arguing that it's not is dishonest or woefully ignorant
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:09 PM
-1

Hypothetically if he's found guilty, it should be weighed in this ruling
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:01 PM
14

He's not the father, so he wouldn't be
/r/MensRights30/06/20 05:50 PM
1

Fuck it you're purposely missing the point of everything I'm saying then misquoting me so you can respond with something. I can answer all your questions and give you all the links and statistics, but you don't wanna listen, you just wanna be mad about things you clearly don't understand. At least now I know that you're not missing vital information, you're just ignoring it. I hoped this convo would be something we could both learn from but ah well. Stay making up your narratives, find someone e…
/r/MensRights16/06/20 06:21 PM
1

Loool infinite time? In your previous message you said "it's here literally dozens of times", surely it can't be that hard to find if that's true. I found the links you asked me for without any issue Don't be dense, bro. It's literally the name of the movement. "killing black people TODAY then someday they'll have to start talking about killing fewer white people too" this is what you're claiming BLM say they wanna accomplish, right? And you got that from the name? not from anyone whose even put…
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:00 PM
1

I see you're not even reading the thread, because it's here literally dozens of times. Literally just looked through the thread, the only link I see is from this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gzhxs7/once_again_sjws_have_changed_the_rules_of_consent/ftib16p?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x it's your point you're trying to prove, give me a link or something so I can know what you're talking about You're out here trying to tell me that if the police stop killing black peopl…
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:10 PM
1

Ok so you're under the impression that BLM will only serve black people, they're the focus but they've risen awareness for others too: https://blavity.com/blm-activists-call-attention-to-graphic-video-of-daniel-shavers-death-at-the-hands-of-arizona-police?category1=news&subCat=race-identity They've openly shamed politicians into adopting the stance that no other lives matter. Do you have a link for that? You think if BLM succeeds, police brutality will continue for everyone else? How would that …
/r/MensRights15/06/20 07:12 PM
1

This whole protest is in regards to the police, I wouldn't start accusing people of trying to paint arguments if I were you, half of your last message was based on assumptions and baseless judgements about me and my beliefs, but I ignored that. If I make a wrong assumption or interpretation of what you're saying then correct it or ignore it, don't go off on some tangent where you make more baseless assumptions about my beliefs or intentions. First Tier, take race out of the equation entirely. De…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 08:29 PM
1

If a police officer does something bad and the "good" cops don't do anything about it - that is being silent and those "good" cops are being complicit. That's not even something to debate, that's literally the meaning of the word Cops kill black people at a higher rate, but that's diverting into BLM vs ALM which sin't what we're talking about It seem likes you're misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting the messages or ideas coming from the left. But you seem to understand that police brutality i…
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:53 PM
1

You can't be complicit to something bad happening to you Are you implying that a rape victim could possibly be complicit in their own rape?
/r/MensRights14/06/20 05:30 PM
1

Being silent when something bad happens makes you complicit, you're allowing the bad thing to happen. In this sense being complicit is giving consent(allowing it to happen) Accountability has always been a thing, it's not something the left just made up
/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:50 PM
1

You're missing the point, not sure if you did it purposely or not
/r/MensRights09/06/20 03:19 PM
2

So is it okay for men to cry or not?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:33 PM
1

I think we're talking about very different groups, I'm talking about people with extreme views who chat shit on social media. Who are you talking about?
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:31 PM
2

There are people saying lots of extreme things unironically from all sides, just another minority group
/r/MensRights15/09/19 09:38 PM
13

Add surveillance to the room?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:12 AM
5

What data? I've only seen your opinions so far in your replies
/r/MensRights05/08/19 10:41 AM
-4

You're getting downvoted because subs like this are for people to get angry about a narrative. They don't wanna think about it from another point of view, they just wanna see her as a FeMiNaZi WaMAn
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/19 12:13 PM
1

Because this is supposed to be a place where we support guys, weather you agree with their own life choices or not (which don't affect you), we should show support. It might not be worth it for you but it could be for them
/r/MGTOW19/06/19 09:08 PM
5

Can't we support both?
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 03:59 PM
36

Step-fathers and (I'm assuming the main people he's getting at:) men who've been told the kid was theirs when it was someone else's
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 03:58 PM
0

...so she is a feminist..? I'm just asking because this post is just a screenshot of a tweet, I can't assume she's a feminist just because she's a woman I don't know anything about her
/r/MensRights01/05/19 03:22 PM
-1

What does this have to do with feminism? Is this person like a leader of a feminist group or like a prominent feminist or something? She just seems like an asshole to me
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:02 PM
2

I completely agree they're already lost, I think it's kinda funny, in a sad way
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:38 PM
1

My points are: Economics play a bigger role in this This issue needs to be addressed from an economic point of view I'm not debating her guilt or if she should be in jail, everyone here agrees on that If you disagree with any of those points, then a conversation can be had otherwise we're just talking about other things
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:52 PM
1

nothing should happen to this woman I literally just said "Cardi B should be in prison" did you even read my comment? It's the last paragraph, did you pay attention to what I said? Why do you think I said "nothing should happen to her"? Where did that come from?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:09 PM
0

Did any of the men press charges?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 09:06 PM
0

idc So you don't wanna have a discussion? You wanna have your opinion and shut your ears to any other points of view? But you think probably still think feminists are the only irrational ones arguing with their feelings You're not actually arguing a point anymore you're just talking about you're feelings Cardi B should be in prison, but so should lots of other rich and famous people, that's all I'm saying
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:53 PM
1

Go ahead and show me one single male celebrity that’s openly admitted to drugging, sexually assaulting and robbing women who still has a career. I will wait. That's an extremely specific criteria you're asking for. What I can do is list rich and powerful men who've gotten away with crimes: Woody Allen has major evidence against him sexually assaulting an under aged girl and he's still a major person in Hollywood Tyga publicly dated an under aged Kardashian Bryan Singer was involved in fucking ki…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:50 PM
1

He was the only director of the movie, the allegations were made before the movie but were then brought up again after it's release
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:38 PM
1

Yes some rich and famous men do get in trouble Yes some rich and famous women do get in trouble But many get away with it, you can list a many men getting in trouble as you like, there are gonna be way more who didn't get in trouble and got away with it, same as the women You raise a good point that rich men get treated more harshly than rich women, but the fact is they both get away with things way more than they should, it's the money, power and influence, then the gender I think this story ha…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:25 PM
1

And I can think of some famous women have gone to prison too, so does that mean rich women don't get special treatment? Very few famous people(male and female) get what they deserve for the shitty things they do, just because some do doesn't mean they all do
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:19 PM
1

Umm where is Chris Brown's career right now I'm assuming you don't pay much attention to him, but he's still very much thriving, he's one of the richest hiphop artists worth $50 mil when was the last time he drugged and robbed somebody? When was the last time Cardi B: Beat up a person so bad they were hospitalised(He even bit her) Involved in a fight seriously injuring 8 people Was caught with drugs on her Was involved in a hit-and-run Was kicked out of a rehab facility for being too violent The…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:15 PM
0

Chris Brown has been beating people up and getting in trouble with the law for well over a decade, the fact that he isn't in prison speaks volumes about his special treatment. His career took a hit, but he still thriving and stayed relevant for much longer than most music artists. If you can't acknowledge the fact that he gets special treatment then there's nothing more to say to you fyi: I'm not a feminist or with MRA, I agree and disagree with points on both sides
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:02 PM
0

Rich men have gotten away with much worse: Woody Allen literally married his own under aged cousin publicly And the guy who directed the Bohemian Rhapsody movie sexually assaulted kids
/r/MensRights18/04/19 11:00 PM
1

Rich powerful men are still getting away with it, some have been prosecuted like the people you listed, but it goes waaay deeper than just those 4. Woody Allen married an under aged girl and he's still a major person in Hollywood Tyga publicly dated an under aged Kardashian Bryan Singer was involved in fucking kids and still he directed the Bohemian Rhapsody movie MeToo is making a difference, but money and influence have more power than anything else Edit: but I do agree it is a mixed of money …
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:55 PM
1

I think you might be replying to the wrong comment, when did I mention people talking behind my back?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:48 PM
6

Johnny Depp is an example of unequal treatment, but I don't think this is. This post is making it out like she got away with it because she's a woman, when really she got away with it because she's rich and famous Gender and economic inequality shouldn't be confused, Maybe she wouldn't have gotten away with it if she was a man, maybe. But how can we know when so many other rich and famous men have gotten away with so much, if she wasn't a celebrity then she'd be treated like a normal person and …
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:54 AM
10

Chris Brown is still thriving in the music industry Woody Allen married an under aged girl and he's still a major person in Hollywood Tyga publicly dated an under aged Kardashian Bryan Singer was involved in fucking kids and still he directed the Bohemian Rhapsody movie It's mainly the money bro, all these people are still thriving and doing whatever they want and society doesn't care
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:26 AM
25

That this isn't a man's issue, it's an economic issue Gender plays a way smaller role in this than her economic status, don't use economic inequality as an example of gender inequality
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:19 AM
57

Rich men get away with crimes like this and sexual assault all the time, it's way more to do with fame and money than it is to do with gender Chris Brown's been doing shitty things publicly for so many years now
/r/MensRights18/04/19 07:41 AM
-2

He's saying that anyone should be able to choose to have the procedure, everyone should be given the choice The issue is that he was basically lied to and if he knew the risks or alternatives, he probably would have chosen against it Another issue is that he didn't seem to heal from the operation like most people do, but the Injustice is that he was lied to
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:33 PM
7

It seems relatively uncommon, but awareness needs to be raised about the risks Most people probably go through with it thinking there aren't any dangers
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:29 PM
2

The slam looked pretty strong from that angle
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/19 09:55 AM
1

I wasn't wrong the first time, Celebrities generally get away with crime way more than regular people Also regular women get arrested for theft, so yh
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:27 PM
50

Are any of the men she drugged pressing charges? If not then I wouldn't expect her to get in much trouble, celebrities get away with shit
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:08 AM
-48

That sounds personal
/r/MensRights02/04/19 02:07 AM
0

I think it's interesting to hear that take on family dynamics in sitcoms/movies; a feminist would probably say that they revolve around the man being the bread winner and the interesting(funny/likeable) character or the woman being a prize to be won I think both your take and the other are valid perceptions of those genres. There seems to be a lot of disconnect between what either side sees from the same thing. I think that's a lot of the reason why MRA and feminists don't see eye to eye, people…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:38 PM
5

People of either gender or political side get death wishes, people did the same to the kid who survived a school shooting and campaigned for gun control. People send death a rape threats to famous feminists too Nothing to do with any side's particular issue, or any side being particularly toxic, people on the internet just become assholes when they can say stuff anonymously
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:47 PM
1

Feminist ideology? I linked Law websites, Governments websites, human rights, websites, BBC, and the dictionary Obviously, you're set in your opinion and no amount of evidence will convince you of the actual **definition** of the word. You realise you are arguing the definition of a word right? Both legal and lingual, this isn't a matter of opinion, this is just what the word **means**, I'm sorry you don't like it or agree but that's the actual meaning of the word
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:26 PM
1

Look it up where? On the internet, these links literally took me <5 minutes to get is not the dictionary definition or the definition held by the vast majority of people. It is a dictionary definition, vast majority of people you know as far as you know FIFY https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/what-are-the-different-types-of-discrimination/sexual-harassment/ http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=6078 https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-help/looking-for-information/wha…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:51 AM
1

Harassment in general encompasses more than just physical action, if you wanna change the rules for sexual harassment, you have to change the rules for all harassment. But the scope of harassment isn't really something I'm up for debating, tbh I think if the person doesn't like it, just don't do it
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:15 PM
1

I'm saying you have to make the right comparisons if you want to point out hypocrisy, like I said before: Compare masculinity to toxic femininity
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:13 PM
1

That's what sexual harassment is, look it up You don't have to agree with it, but that's what it's called so that's what it is
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:07 PM
11

Everyone goes to court to fight/negotiate alimony, I didn't say all women are ok with it, ofc some wouldn't be ok with it, a lot of men aren't either. I'm saying the women they've shown all seem pretty calm about it for people who are "PISSED"
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 12:25 PM
-5

There aren't even as many false AND true rape accusations as there are cases of sexual harassment Sexual harassment encompasses dozens of actions, from cat calls to inappropriate touching to even inappropriate jokes, do you think there are more people making false rape claims than there are people cat calling alone?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:22 PM
17

Finally, I think this gives good examples of hypocrisy The other comparisons I've seen really haven't been on par with the points made in the Gillette ad, or just completely out of context Even this post, false rape accusations aren't nearly as common the sexual harassment and rape pointed out in the Gillette as, so it's no as simple to compare. The highest comment is about women beating their kids with a kettle cord... The issues this video pointed out are very common and a lot of them are prob…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:43 AM
36

Everyone in the clip is a woman and most of them seem ok with it There's nothing wrong with the segment, it's just at the end when the reporter said that some women aren't ok with it
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 09:09 AM
28

stupid cunt Where's that coming from? Wtf is this sub, I swear it's just a bunch of people with chips on their shoulders who just wanna hate
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/19 01:17 PM
1

People had been downvoting them from the start, since before he other comments or replies But downvoting someone because their motives are to troll is perfectly reasonable
/r/MensRights28/12/18 02:13 PM
-6

You're being downvoted because a lot (not all) of the people in this sub are the thing they hate: they're a mirror image of the feminazis who use their feelings to validate their opinions A lot of them can't explain or answer your questions because they don't know how to answer, all they know is that they don't like their ideas being questioned. Which is ironic because this is the thing they fault feminazis for. Some of the people here just wanna be in an echo chamber of like minded people and c…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:25 PM
10

Where's the double standard? One person made a joke, and another person replied with a similar joke, this isn't even PPD
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/18 03:56 PM
0

I could say the same thing to you about them
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:52 AM
1

That's a pretty broad statement for people you don't know who were in situations you've never been in...
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:40 PM
0

Tell that to the people who commit suicide because their lives are harder and more painful than death, everyone has their limits
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:08 AM
1

They still did it, I can't say if it was more of less often than the Spanish, but they definitely did it
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:27 AM
0

You say that like becoming free is a choice, most didn't escape, a lot of them died after being raped Maybe you'd rather being enslaved and raped with almost no chance of escape instead of just die, all I know is I wouldn't and that all the ones who could and did kill themselves are in agreement
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:26 AM
0

Dead people also can't be traumatised, there are plenty of situations where it's better to be dead than suffer
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:16 AM
-29

A lot of them enslaved and raped the women, that's worse than death imo
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:39 AM
1

They complain about "too much diversity" in games and comics all the time
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/18 03:17 PM
1

There are stats and quotes that back up her claim, and some that contradict her, just saying https://youtu.be/NX8AJvTtt-4?t=540
/r/MensRights13/09/18 01:00 AM
1

Subs like these go downhill really fast because they fill with anti-SJWs, who I think are just as bad tbh
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 12:57 AM
3

I don't think the ump looks like a racist caricature Naomi is dark skinned with some of her air blonde, other people have pointed this out
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 12:52 AM
1

I think this sub has been a circle jerk for a while, this isn't really the place for discussion, just another echo chamber
/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:48 AM
1

Tell to her, I'm just explaining what she was complaining about Lots of other male players have come out to support her and said men have said worse and only gotten warnings. There is sexism in tennis, I can't say if this is an example of it or not, but I don't think it's clear cut, there's conflicting information
/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:47 AM
-10

No one else feels like this picture is racist? The exaggerated features she's drawn with? The fact that she's posed like an angry ape? That her opponent is drawn as a blonde white person?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 11:19 PM
-13

She's saying she was penalised more harshly than a man would have been, not to do with her opponent
/r/MensRights10/09/18 03:48 PM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:48 AM
1

That's why I ask, because I live in London and I've experienced different Someone gave me a link tho, so no biggie https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision Apparently 15%
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:48 AM
2

What do you mean? It's mainly Christian
/r/MensRights13/07/18 08:46 AM
-2

Do you have stats for that? Asking because what I've seen contradicts that Edit: I live in the UK, not sure why I'm being downvoted for asking an honest question
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:19 AM
0

Not most
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 03:21 PM
3

THANK YOU People on both sides need to stop complaining about being generalised, when that's what they do to other groups
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:21 PM
3

For the ones who are lying, yh
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:48 PM
12

That's true, but also, a lot of rape victims have trouble telling the police Ether case seems pretty possible
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:16 PM
5

What did you say to get you banned?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/17 07:01 AM
1

They say that a lot of these raped go unreported, so where does this data come from, is it all just estimation? Serious question
/r/MensRights14/07/17 05:11 PM
1

I have but all I've seen is extremists, a few bad feminists making the movement look bad(but all movements have that) nothing showing what you're talking about (feminism being an anti male movement). I asked because I thought you knew something I didn't know or could show me something I hadn't seen before (not being snide, not sure hoe this would read)
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:51 AM
2

nah bro, I don't think feminism is anti man, so I want examples to know what you're talking about. Maybe they are, but form what I've seen they seem to do mostly good
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:10 PM
2

Any examples of core feminism being anti male?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:32 PM
1

I think the idea is that men have more positions of power, so they wanna make it equal by giving women those same positions of power too (equal amounts)
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:05 PM
1

Pretty sure it's just for stats, so they can build of data on what groups of people are applying for what and how successful each group is when applying and all that, average success rate of each group... I think... I assume
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:58 PM
1

Tbf if the doctors told them nothing bad would happen then it's fair to be surprised when something bad happens
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:20 AM
1

So men and women have different muscle types? Looked it up, they have the same types of muscle, it's mainly down size and bone structure. (A lot of conflicting stuff) "Much stronger" is an exaggeration but yh, men are generally stronger
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 06:20 PM
1

Women have beat men up before... so it is a possibility
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 11:55 AM
1

if all things are equal in terms of experience, height, and weight, the female has almost no chance of winning that fight Yh, I defo agree with that, but Ronda has way more experience and skill than a college wrestler. the top female fighter against a guy who is pretty average in the same weight class, and he will win. Ok that I can't agree with, a 60kg man wouldn't be much stronger than a professional female fighter who weighs the same. If you put her against an average sized man with average s…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:10 PM
-1

It doesn't seem fair for you to say what women are capable of if you haven't faced any of the top tier fighters, you could make a fair vague generalization and talk about the average man vs the average woman but we're talking about a top tier fighter rn. But from what I've been told she can't strike for shit, so she might be fucked
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:30 AM
1

Oh yh, mb I misread what you said
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:26 AM
1

OK if she can't strike, then yeah, she's probably fucked
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:24 AM
0

That's not a fair generalisation, there are a lot of women who can hit hard enough to knock a man out, I've seen women beat up men before, it definitely can happen. If we're talking about 90kg men, that's another thing but you can't make blanket statements like that and expect to be right.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:23 AM
1

I'm not talking about Mayweather, I'm talking about college wrestlers
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:14 AM
0

Have you spared with a professional? serious question
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:12 AM
1

That's a nice backed up by nice reasoning
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:08 AM
1

In MMA she stands a really really good chance against someone not trained in MMA. What? But she's beaten other MMA fighters tho
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 10:08 AM
3

...what? Chill man, you're the type who makes the sub look bad
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 12:57 AM
-37

Really tho? That's a huge claim, Ronda's trained to actually punch and kick, she's trained in multiple martial arts. If it was a straight up wrestling match, she'd probably lose 80% of the time but in her sport she'd win most of the time
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 12:55 AM
5

They're not all aggressive angry man-haters, those are just the few that subs like this like to focus on
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:43 PM
9

Very bad things bombed too
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/17 09:14 PM
7

You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain RIP Harvey Dent
/r/MensRights12/05/17 11:47 PM
2

True
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 08:25 PM
0

Hey, dude. She shouldn't have pushed him, and yh he didn't have much time to think, I'm not blaming the guy all I'm saying is that I don't think she deserved that. She pushed someone and got her head slammed against the ground. The guy was doing his job and I don't know what I would have done if I was him, but looking at it on tape I'm just saying that I don't think a push deserves a head slam on concrete.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 08:25 PM
1

I don't think the punishment suits what she did, I think she deserved to get charged with assault, not dropped on her head
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 07:19 PM
2

He grabbed her from the front so she couldn't belly down, but if it's standard then ok
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 07:17 PM
1

He saw her coming, he watched her approach him, but I see what you're saying
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 07:14 PM
-1

She pushed him, and he watched her coming. He slammed her head onto the ground. But I haven't been trained so I can't say if what he did was right or not, but it looks excessive to me. In the US she could have gotten shot, which seem like a pretty big problem, she shouldn't be killed in a situation like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 07:12 PM
-36

You wouldnt say thats kinda excessive tho? That slam
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 11:53 AM
0

Lol you sound like a neckbeard dude
/r/MensRights08/01/17 10:57 PM
0

lmfao can't believe this turned into a name calling game. Okay my turn... ummm... You're a lonely misogynistic baby who so badly wants to be oppressed
/r/MensRights08/01/17 10:55 PM
1

You can't act condescending after you've already gotten mad😂
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:11 PM
0

lol You're a stranger on the internet dude
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:09 PM
0

good job, now I'm convinced that women have no issues that need to be fixed
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:22 PM
1

Loooool ok sorry didn't think being shown conflicting evidence would make you mad
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:20 PM
0

you just won't listen to any reason or evidence You give one source, I give several sources you continue to ignore everything you dislike I literally quote your points and give conflicting stats, but ok. I gave you links and sources but I bet you haven't even looked at them. discard all evidence You mean your one link? Like I said, I gave more evidence than you gave me. and present false claims without validation. Like my several links and sources? You can even look it up yourself That's everyth…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:08 PM
0

Ok well I see legitimate feminist groups as representatives for the movement, you see anyone who calls themselves a feminist as a representative, nothing can be done about that. Studies about domestic violence Affects 1/4f and 1/6m same stats different source Worldwide facts(But these are focused on women) All of the most domestically violent countries are mainly violent to women I'm not gonna give you links to stats of each country you can look that up if you want Do you honestly think worldwid…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 12:37 AM
1

So I spoke to her again, and talked and she suggested I do my own research too. The feminist groups who do these destructive things genuinely aren't recognised legitimate groups, it's true. There are a lot of different feminist groups around the world and the ones that are legally recognised as actual feminist groups and charities don't do stuff like take down men's shelters. They aren't groups that do bad things and have they're feminist status taken away; they're groups who in the first place …
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:48 PM
1

So one of them said The real legitimised feminist groups do denounce things like tearing down men's shelters Most domestic violence scenarios are men being violent to women. Side note: maybe in the place you live in there is more violence against men, but world wide women are usually the victims. So I saw her point there Feminism does and has helped men, the anti male "Feminist groups" get more attention because the media only cares about sensationalism. She also said that she wouldn't blame som…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:18 PM
1

The thing is they would be able to do the same as men but they aren't given the chance. If I gave you ankle weights and you couldn't run as fast as everyone else it doesn't mean you're a slow runner, it means you just haven't been given equal footing Lol how many women do you know, when it comes to having sex sure they can be a little pickier than guys but that doesn't mean it's easy for them to get laid. Less? No any stranger's life means the same to me as the next regardless of gender.... And …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:40 PM
1

You've had a tough life... So I guess all men have had the life you've had. I gave you examples in my last reply, so there you go
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:22 AM
1

The fact that they don't have the same status in rank is why there should be equality. Men and women aren't as different as squirrels and dogs. I get your point but the difference is no where near that major. Like I said I'm not patriotic so bringing soldiers into it doesn't really mean anything to me. I gave you the rest of your answer at the end of my last reply
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:20 AM
1

I'm not making an arguement, I just think that if you're willing to defend yourself against a man but not a woman then you're a part of your own problem. I am not saying they deserve it, what I'm saying is they're helpless and they are a part of the society that says keep women on a pedestal. I'm not blaming the victim, I literally said that they need help (people who can't take care of themselves need help) I don't live in America maybe there's something in the food that makes everyone gynocent…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:13 AM
1

I was abused by women in my youth I literally said "unless they were abused as a child" So do you now have a fear of women?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:20 PM
1

I'm not ignoring anyone, I didn't say all men get a say in how society is, but the fact is the people who do get a say are men. I was asked a question of numbers and majority, the fact is women get less of a say thank men because there are almost no women making the decisions. Ok, wouldn't you say the 60's was a world built around and for men? That doesn't mean all me in the 60's got their own throne, but the world was definitely made for them. Or what about a country like Saudi Arabia, their wo…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:17 PM
1

Well the majority doesn't have control, and that's the way it is, numbers don't always equal power and control The fact is that men have more control over society, if you wanna call women inferior because of that, then ok. Woman who's slept with 20 guys= slut Guy who's slept with 20 women= stud Same situation, different genders, different standards; that's a double standard Which arguement above? The fact that the laws in America don't concern me? Because if I truly cares about everyone around t…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:08 PM
0

men are raised to never hit a woman That's stupid if you believe that you can't hit a woman but it's ok to hit a man then you're the one holding yourself back. People like you tell them men aren't abused and don't need help Stop creating a narrative of me, you don't know me, if you do again then there's no point in having this discussion because you're just gonna keep making stuff up to assume those are my thoughts. Ofc men can be abused, but if you're being physically abused by someone weaker t…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:00 PM
1

Well yh, men have way more control over society than women do, huge businesses, pretty much the media as a whole, ad campaigns. At the very top is probably a man, even in government it's men. If the majority really had control there would be no 1% or Monopolies. Ofc women can and are swaying society, but there isn't any true control. That's how it works for any country. That's still a double standard, which is a problem. Yes, I should be compelled to fight for rights everywhere, and if I was, th…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:37 PM
1

Those are personal feelings, not facts ....well yh, I said that already. That link you gave me is another example of what I don't understand, how can you let someone weaker than you physically abuse you like that, it makes no sense to me. Then you're uneducated First off, chill with that, you don't know me I don't know you; get off of your high horse. Second that's something in your country not mine, the world is bigger than America. I'm pretty sure anyone from any other country could say the sa…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:19 PM
1

Ok I'll look into it
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:58 PM
1

Yh I see what you mean
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:40 PM
1

Yh true
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:39 PM
1

That seems like an outlook based on opinion that can't really be swayed. We could fight with statistics, but at he end of the day it won't prove what denomination of the group believe in what. Edit: but I see what you're saying
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:38 PM
1

I was talking world wide bro. If we started talking about the world as a whole, then you can't argue than women are disadvantaged. In England a lot of your gender laws have no effect on us But to keep it American, I can't think of any thing government enforced that benefits men over women. But society is much wider than the government, even as children gender roles are forced into everyone, that is a big problem. Boys are taught they can be the hero and build anything they want. And girls are pr…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:35 PM
1

you are either incredibly dense Lol ok bye
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:22 PM
1

Tbh a man being afraid of a woman seems really strange to me, unless they were abused as a child, I don't see what they would have to fear from other women. (Don't attack me for that, it's a view, if you want to change it or show me why I'm wrong then please do. But for now I don't see the threat that all/most women can pose to a man that warrants genuine fear of them) I've never heard of the Duluth model, and it sounds stupid, it seems like something the country's government should be blamed fo…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:20 PM
1

Yh, again you're misunderstanding what I'm trying to say. If I meet someone I'm going to take them at face value unless I have a reason not to. I've met feminists who are pretty chill (maybe they're different when they get online, but I haven't seen that dude of them, so I can't speak on it)
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:10 PM
-4

So these men who are abused can't be around women anymore? The point of a women's shelter is to protect women who have damaged by men so badly that they can't handle being around another man out of fear (PTSD). Men might be victims of abuse more than women but does that make them afraid to be around women anymore?(this is a question for you to answer, not one for you to attack me over) The word you're looking for is privilege, or supremacy. Take your pick How about you just talk to me like we're…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:35 PM
0

I've always thought that feminisms main concern was with women's issues, they have helped men before, and are still trying to help men, just not as much as they are for women. I was never under the impression that they cared about men's issues as much as women's, but maybe that was just me
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:28 PM
0

True, and tbh I think their should be more men's shelters. I wouldn't get mad at feminism for not making them, but if you have a problem with it I understand
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:22 PM
1

you decided that this meant, "every feminist I know hates men," I didn't, I said "I can't assume every feminist I meet hates men", meaning that I'm not going to look into all my friends internet history to see what their agendas are. Either I worded it badly or you read it differently than how I intended. You then bravely stabbed this hideous creature until the whole ground was.... ... Loooool what dude?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:19 PM
-6

Dude, don't be snide, just get your question/point across. No, because there's arguably a more urgent need for women's shelters, and because feminism fights for equality by tackling mainly women's issues; it's always been that way
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:10 PM
2

Ok, I can't assume every feminist I meet hates men, so I'll take your answer with a pinch of salt. Thanks for your input
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:54 PM
2

Holy hell people, it's a question, it's a legit question. You're answer is: most feminists are radical. (With a link) Ok thank you for your answer
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:51 PM
2

Pretty much, that's how it seems to me
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:25 PM
1

Yh, but if they wanna mainly focus on women's issues then that shouldn't come as a surprise, they've been doing that from the start
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:24 PM
1

No, because any good one would probably be far outshone by radical ones. But mainly because I don't follow either movement closely, it isn't that important to me at the moment. If you want, I can look some up and give you a little list
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:23 PM
0

They want equality by mainly tackling women's issues. (Since you could argue that women have more issues to fight for) So they could see opening women's shelters as a more pressing matter than opening men's. There is a need for men's shelters but there could be more women who need their own shelter
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:16 PM
1

keep bringing up downvotes I brought it up once, any other time I mentioned it would have been in response to someone else
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:12 PM
2

But 50% of feminists aren't taking down shelters and being radical, you haven't proven that it is most of them. You've just made up statistics. someone who is trying their best to misunderstand what is being said. Is this gonna be a discussion or are you gonna slowly start taking more digs at me dude, just chill and get your point across
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:09 PM
2

According to the definition of pacifism, no you wouldn't be one. And according to the definition of feminism, these guys who shut down the shelter aren't feminists. Yet people are coming after them like they are feminists. But pacifism isn't a movement so it's hard to compare it to feminism
/r/MensRights03/01/17 06:01 PM
2

If it was just rad-fems doing it, then where is the backlash from feminists against the rad-fems? Non-existant, that's where. Why is it so difficult to get an answer like this? This is the only response I really needed yet so many people are coming after me like I'm trying to argue. Thank you
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:56 PM
5

Yh, you're right that is a problem, that's why I think subs like this are necessary. Where are the one real feminism had opened? Tbh I'd understand why they wouldn't open men's shelters, but they should definitely try to put a stop to radical feminism, closing shelters down. It's not a good look
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:40 PM
0

Exactly it makes them look bad, just like the people down voting my question I don't know what the ":)" is for, but ok
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:35 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:33 PM
1

Thanks for giving me an actual answer, but where are your percentages coming from. From what I know about feminist I've actually met it seems like the ones 8 see online are just a minority who stand out
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:36 PM
17

You're being downvoted for not adding anything to the conversation. The topic is on feminism and I'm asking a question about it. I'm genuinely wondering how much more relevant to the topic I can be. Is there anyway to challenge/question the thread without being seen as a troll
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:57 PM
-1

Men are not an ideology... That's why I listed the others. So do you think that all republicans are racists, or all MRA members are misoginistic?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:54 PM
-10

Yes percentage matters: some men rape, doesn't make all men rapists Some republicans are racists, doesn't make all of them racist Some MRA members are misoginistic, doesn't mean they all are See what I mean?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 02:14 PM
-10

Is it half of feminists doing this kind of thing though? Surely only the few radical feminists stand out, making it seem like a lot of them do it. Edit: I'm really getting downvoted for asking a question? Do you guys see how doing that makes this sub look?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter