TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sheebamcentire Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by sheebamcentire on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

sheebamcentire/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's okay because Obama LIES about his religious beliefs just to get votes, he's a great fella! Obama 2012
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:13 PM
2

Lol in other words he's a liar. My word, you are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:12 PM
2

The Federal Reserves creates money out of thin air and gives it to the banks, thus an invisible tax on the people. You need some sort of hard limit to prevent the central bank from doing this.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:55 PM
1

It was a dumb idea and you should correct your mistake. It mostly just causes more drama as you can see for yourself here.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:52 PM
0

No no, it has a very obvious meaning. It refers to the socialist state that you love so much, Mr. communist socialist me luv big government long time even though it is at fault for almost all men's rights issues. You love welfare, which has destroyed the family. You love subsidizing failure and creating moral hazards. You love the nanny state. That's what it refers to. Quit whining about how you don't like the term that accurately describes your socialist fascist dreamworld. By the way I reporte…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:50 PM
2

He's not getting elected because the media controls the dumb sheep.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:25 PM
3

vote Ron Paul
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:25 PM
1

In other words, ignatiusloyola loves his nanny state. Notice he focused entirely on the term nanny state instead of actually making an argument for why the nanny state is a good thing. Typical.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:16 PM
3

You've got to message the moderators and hope that ignatiusloyola doesn't see it because if he doesn't like your article, and he probably won't if it's anything politically incorrect, he's not going to let it through. http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FMensRights
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:22 AM
2

Also apologies if I come across as an asshole, but I have absolutely zero respect for ignatiusloyola based on the things I've seen him do. He's a manipulative ideologue who weaseled his way into the good graces of the previous moderator, kloo2yoo, and there's only one thing he seems to care about: being politically correct to try to make MRAs look appealing to the mainstream and pushing away anyone who's not Leftist. I don't even think he's an MRA, just someone who likes "power". If he were an M…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:14 AM
2

I think most of it comes from having the same end goals but different ways and intentions to reach those goals. The goal of Leftists like ignatiusloyola and OThomson is equality at any cost, and destruction if we cannot have it. It is an impossible goal.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:44 AM
2

That only happens with ignatiusloyola because he starts hostilities. Qanan is obviously level headed and doesn't resort to personal attacks and straw man arguments the moment he's challenged, so obviously it's not a problem.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:40 AM
3

I think ignatiusloyola should have to face an AMA from the community.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:39 AM
1

Email confirms do not help, it's easy as pie to create a new email account. This all has already been discussed. There are few users who are like TheHumanTornado, willing to keep creating accounts specifically to troll r/MensRights, as explained here weeks ago by AboutMensRights: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3mmsri?context=1 Also seeing as ignatiusloyola harasses certain groups of MRAs repeatedly and then bans them when they…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 10:38 AM
3

This is true thus far, but let's hope Qanan is made of more. He is a genuine MRA and seems quite reasonable, so I think ignatiusloyola is going to regret making him a moderator. I don't think Qanan will keep quiet and fall in line like AnnArchist has.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:31 AM
2

I do not believe ignatiusloyola wishes to solve the troll problem. Users have already provided very simple instructions for how to end the problem, and he has either ignored or harassed them. You are also probably too "conservative" for ignatiusloyola. He would probably never consider you for moderator.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:29 AM
2

You've got some work to do if you're to make this place better. Please read my note here. Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:20 AM
4

The only things that are negative are long comment threads in arguments with you and a few others - these are comment threads that only people with vested interests read and therefore are going to be devoid of being representative. That's an interesting theory that does not jive with reality. I've seen many threads especially where it concerns moderation policy where you are heavily down-voted and those who challenge you are heavily up-voted because users disagree with your policies, which are b…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:10 AM
1

blows raspberries The concepts are inseparable.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:01 PM
1

tl;dr: gprime is not an MRA and will never, ever donate to any men's rights site.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:30 PM
4

No, we are talking about equal rights (see thread title). You are trying to limit equal rights to legal rights so you can ignore social rights and allow women countless privileges over men while gaining them equal legal rights - in other words feminism. You're so transparent.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:18 PM
-4

You are a troll, an anti-male troll.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:52 AM
1

In other words, yes they are cowards. They only act when it affects them directly. You are just being apologetic for cowards.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:50 AM
-3

Where is this so-called misogyny? By lying about this, you out yourself as a misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:48 AM
-7

TROLL ALERT: FARUN is a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:47 AM
3

Shouldn't that troll be banned by now? Message the moderators
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:46 AM
1

Well that's nice but ignatiusloyola is not a free speech person, as he routinely bans MRAs while letting anti-male trolls run rampant here. Looking at motive is part of skepticism and critical thinking. Agree. Why don't you look at ignatiusloyola's motives? History of supporting feminists and anti-male trolls and banning MRAs. Yeah, pretty clear bud.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:07 AM
2

Comment on my statement, not what you think my motivations are. By doing so you defend a gynocentric feminist who harasses and bans MRAs and welcomes feminist trolls.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:59 AM
1

ignatiusloyola has feminist sentiments. He antagonizes MRAs and welcomes feminists. So yeah, I think it's safe to say he's gynocentric and the OP is absolutely right. http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/n7ipp/the_eternal_feminism_of_ignatiusloyolas_mind/
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:35 AM
-1

You don't need subtlety when the moderators support trolling.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:11 AM
10

This user is just a troll who should have been banned a long time ago. If only the mods would do their job.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:53 PM
-1

No it's not more effective than banning. How dumb are you? Silly sycophant. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3mmsri?context=3
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:46 AM
3

The current mods don't do anything anyway, why would we need more people who do nothing? What we need is new mods who actually ban the SRS trolls and end the problem.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:18 PM
0

Continued infractions SHOULD lead to a ban because they are unproductive, and in the end, hate speech, to justify marginalization of men's issues, and the demonization of men. I agree but ignatiusloyola has refused to do so: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3maufm
/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:00 AM
-1

Stop trying to analyze my intentions, retard. I stated them quite plainly. ignatiusloyola should ban users who are clearly pro-misandry and only here to derail and troll. That includes SRS posters and a few others. If he does not then things only get worse here, the quality of the sub-reddit only gets worse. And he has just stated that he will not. So it proves my point. He does nothing because he does not care about this sub-reddit and he is not an MRA. Since I AM an MRA, and don't wish to be b…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 11:37 PM
0

You see, someone who actually cared about men's rights wouldn't say that. But you care more about "looking good" than about accomplishing anything, which is why you are not an MRA, and are actually quite counter-productive to the men's rights movement. I would say you're just as anti-men's rights as any SRS troll. Not surprising of course, considering you share an extreme socialist bordering on communist ideology and you welcome them here to disrupt this sub-reddit, and refuse to ban anti-men's …
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:52 AM
0

ignatiusloyola doesn't ban SRS folks because he likes having them here to harass MRAs. In this way he keeps the dialogue to his liking. Like you said regarding GMP: its actually becoming more and more male friendly with actual debates , i never thought id see the day . So when you ban anti-male trolls, the environment naturally becomes more male friendly and productive. The reason ignatiusloyola refuses to do this is because he fears that if he bans the anti-men's rights trolls, the more "tradit…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:12 AM
3

I agree with your original statement, but the answer is not more moderators. It's just that the current moderators need to ban these trolls and be done with it. It takes very little effort to ban obvious anti-men's rights trolls. The current moderators just don't bother.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:59 PM
-7

as usual fools can only reply with crap rather than refuting the argument
/r/MensRights29/01/12 12:43 AM
-13

It's part of the liberal agenda to feminize men and make them act more like women. Homosexuals who dominate Hollywood decide that all men should act like them, so they make men in such films act like jealous little girls and fairyboys. This actually encourages men in real life who watch this stuff to act this way, and it encourages women to expect men to fawn over them. It's similar to what happens in romantic comedies where guys "make themselves better" in order to win over the "popular girl". …
/r/MensRights28/01/12 10:10 PM
0

Shut up Jeremiah or he's gonna ban you, I can tell he's fuming BECAUSE NOBODY TELLS IGNATIUSLOYOLA WHAT TO DO, NOT EVEN THE USERS! RAWWRRRR!
/r/MensRights26/01/12 03:30 AM
-5

It's the moderators' fault for welcoming anti-men's rights trolls and harassing MRAs. What do you expect? ignatiusloyola loves this drama because he thinks we're a bunch of misogynists who deserve to be berated by misandric trolls. Otherwise he would ban the obvious anti-men's rights trolls.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:43 AM
3

Good thing your moderators don't do shit about it. ignatiusloyola's basically a feminist himself anyway, fuckin' socialist. He actually seems to enjoy the fact that this sub-reddit is inundated with SRS trolls.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 09:30 AM
-2

ignatiusloyola won't add it, he's a terrible moderator, never does anything useful
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter