TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shema_echad2 Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by shema_echad2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Pretty sure it satirizing this one scene from a rom-com (can't recall the name).
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 01:49 PM
1

You're a lot more balanced than I first thought you would be. Also note, I'm not questioning the Christian Bible per se (that too), but Christianity, which doesn't even follow its own scripture. Also, there are two ways Christianity blaspheme and mock the truth. First you have actual, traditional Christianity, that is theologically satanic and idolatrous in nature. The second would be the modern, secularized pozzed, Protestant denominations, like the Lutheran state churches of the Episcopal Chur…
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:58 PM
1

Nobody's crapping on the Bible specifically, but they do crap on Christianity/Christian for various reasons. But nobody craps on the Bible as much as Christians themselves do.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:25 PM
2

It is obvious that the deification of modern day scientism has created your seemingly blatant hatred of Christianity and religion in general...these beliefs all have great eternal wisdom and knowledge intertwined into their messages. No, I'm definitely not an atheist. Christianity is evil because it's a satanic inversion of the truth.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:13 PM
1

Nations who follow Gods laws are always fruitful until they submit to their sins and their worldly desires. Lmao. Which law and God would that be? Christianity is a polytheistic, idolatrous, pagan religion, that has been in open apostasy since at the very least 325 AD, and they're always taught God's law was made obsolete.
/r/MGTOW22/04/20 06:01 PM
0

Christians didn't exist then, he never used the word Christian, and he would probably have a some harsh words to say to Christians if they were around. And nobody's "saved".
/r/MGTOW20/04/20 06:41 PM
-1

LDS claims to be Christian. Yes. They still aren't. The Catholic Church is not the mother church, Christianity split off from them. Yes, they are, and no, Christianity didn't. The Protestant churches split from the RCC, not Christianity. And that's exactly what makes them the mother church. They also compiled and canonized your Bible, and hosted every single canonical ecumenical council, and authored every single foundational creed of Christianity. And the reformers never intended to found a new…
/r/MGTOW11/04/20 07:43 PM
-1

Even though the church sucks, I do recommend Christianity. (Not LDS or Catholicism) LDS isn't Christianity though. And the Cathodox Church is literally the mother church of Christianity. It is by far the most likely to be accurate. Nope. Christianity is 100% false, and probably the only religion who's documented history and creeds bears witness against its own lies and fabrications. It's also the most self-contradictive religion on the planet, and an inversion and perversion of the Hebraic relig…
/r/MGTOW11/04/20 06:23 PM
2

Voluntarily given? You mean they don't hold a gun to your head? It's a digusting scam, and a disgusting cult. And Mormon is a ficticious character invented by a 19th century con-man.
/r/MGTOW10/04/20 12:42 PM
1

Most heterosexuals aren't nasty degenerates.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 05:56 PM
3

Who's suppose to be the winner here? The initial comment or the nasty bugchaser replying?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/20 05:43 PM
1

Firstly, there is one God but he has a Son. It's that simple. 1 Tim. 2:5: For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus Christians don't believe in one God, they believe in three. And you yourself just argued Jesus was a deity. Which is it? The bible is the "word" of God because he speaks to us in its sacred pages. You can find the phrase "Word of God" throughout the entire bible No, the Bible is a compilation of several books compiled and canonized accord…
/r/MGTOW24/02/20 05:36 PM
1

It all comes down to trusting and believing in God, His Son and the Word of God. No it doesn't. Not even remotely. You don't even have the same God as Jesus, and you've elected to disobey the most important, clear-cut commandment to worship the one God alone. And the Bible as compiled and canonized doesn't claim itself to be God's word. Do you even know how it was compiled and canonized, and according to which self-professed authority? And it's definitely not one book, it's usually 66, 73 or eve…
/r/MGTOW23/02/20 07:27 PM
1

I definitely agree. There's probably a massive amount of unreported cases.
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 11:26 PM
1

Disregarding anti-immigration parties, there's literally no difference between left and right in that regard
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 10:49 PM
8

Imagine that, a tsunami of molestation lawsuits just a few years after allowing sodomite scout leaders. What a coinkydink. I bet nobody saw it coming.
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 10:36 PM
1

Nope. It's not a messianic prophecy period, and you have no idea how Hebrew and theophoric names work. And Isaiah's own children were also given symbolic names to be symbols and sign for Israel. And by elsewhere you mean Isaiah 9:6. This is about Hezekiah, not any future messiah. The Hebrew text is in past tense, but Christianity and the Church has conspired throughout the ages to willfully mistranslate it as future tense.
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 08:58 PM
1

Nope. Psalms aren't prophecies, and Isaiah 7:14 is a prophecy about the fall of the Syro-Ephraimite military alligiance 8th century BC, not some pagan God-man. You don't have a remote clue what you're talking about.
/r/MGTOW21/02/20 08:50 PM
1

Neither Jews or Muslims believe in any incarnate, pagan God-man however, nor is that described in Daniel 7, or anywhere in the Hebrew Bible. The fact is you shouldn't look forward to the prospect of a second coming. Literally the only institution on the face of the planet that perfectly fulfills your own prophecy of a Whore of Babylon is Christianity itself, your own Church in particular.
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 02:07 PM
1

Almah doesn't mean virgin, it means young woman or maiden. And Immanuel is a personal name, and a person that lived 8th century BC. And it says she shall call him, meaning his mother shall name him Immanuel. Remind me again, was Jesus/Yeshua named Immanuel or Jesus? Like I said, 100% Christian fabrications.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 06:49 PM
1

It's used because it's a Christian fabrication of course. Why wouldn't they use it? And Jesus specifically didn't fulfill the messianic prophecies, that's why Christianity and the Church had to fabricate their own, and why they await its fulfillment on the second coming. And the messiah is suppose to be a God-fearing servant of God (Is. 11:1-5), not some incarnate, pagan God-man and God #2 that's magically also the son of God. Christianity and Christian theology is a rat's nest of lies and endle…
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 06:46 PM
1

Nope. Psalms are not prophecies, and David is the first person speaker of the Psalm. And a lord is any person or authority and/or a title. So what about it? And virtually all Hebrew names have theophoric meanings. It's not describing attributes, it's literally a personal name. And Immanuel lived 8th century BC. And the prophecy was fulfilled when Syria and Ephraim fell at the hands of Assyria. You don't have a remote clue what you're talking about.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 06:41 PM
2

Isaiah 7 is a prophecy about the fall the Syro-Ephraimite military alligiance, during the reign of king Ahaz, 8th century BC. The child iself isn't even the sign, the sign is the fall of Syria and Ephraim at the hands of Assyria when the child reaches a certain age of maturity. You literally only have to add two verses of context: 15 Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good. 16 For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good,…
/r/MGTOW17/02/20 06:08 PM
1

There no virgin birth or any prophecy about a future, pagan God-man messiah anywhere in Isaiah.
/r/MGTOW17/02/20 02:18 PM
0

No, there's no prophecy about a son of God, or a virgin birth anywhere in the Hebrew Bible. Those are Christian inventions.
/r/MGTOW17/02/20 02:18 PM
4

So he said yes, then broke up? Learn to read between the lines, cuck. Breaking up is an emphatic no, and the only sane option.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 02:58 PM
6

He did say no, you illiterate degenerate. And broke up like any sane person would.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 12:10 PM
2

Ah, I misunderstood the intent of your question.
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 07:27 PM
4

Where and why?
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 08:57 AM
-1

I don't like the EU, but holy shit this is a dumb comment.
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 08:54 AM
1

It's illegal to not hire someone because of their gender. If you don't see why this rule exists, you might enjoy r/feminism. The absolute irony. It's because of ideologies like feminism these laws even exist. No governmental agency should have a right telling you who you're suppose to entrust your child with, and who you're suppose to let into your own home. If you don't get that you're definitely part of the problem. And the father stopped corresponding because a change of planes, and this weir…
/r/MGTOW24/08/19 08:32 AM
4

Last time I checked fathers were parents too. But sure, let's have the government dictate which stranger is allowed to watch your own children in your own home, I'm sure that will work out just fine. child abuse safety clearances What, seven whole years without raping a single child? Who wouldn't hire this guy?!
/r/MGTOW23/08/19 08:50 PM
-2

Yes, and a parent should be able to discriminate in regards to the people they hire to watch their children. The father is a man too btw.
/r/MGTOW23/08/19 07:34 PM
-1

I don't even care about this individual case, there's no such thing as a win in a innately perverse system. Stating that parents shouldn't be allowed to freely discriminate in regards to the strangers they entrust their children with is just peak clown world degeneracy.
/r/MGTOW23/08/19 06:58 PM
-9

Win! Only of you accept and play by their rules. I wouldn't have hired a grown man as a babysitter either.
/r/MGTOW23/08/19 06:10 PM
1

You did not offer any of the answers I requested of you. Matthew 1:23 cf. Isaiah 7:14. That's the fourth time you've been given the same reference. You polytheists just can't stop lying. Now where are you examples of contradictions produced by mistranslations? Oh, that's right, you have none.
/r/MGTOW19/08/19 10:59 PM
0

No, the contradictions are there in Greek and Hebrew too, the Bible still isn't one book, the Hebrew Bible was translated to Greek Long before the NT, and Jerome's 4th translation to Latin in the Vulgate was certainly not done in secracy, nor the Vetus Latina translation preceeding it. Do you people ever stop lying? So you even speak a word of Hebrew or Greek? Anyways, this debate happened many years ago. Oh? Where, when? You'd almost think being a pathological liar is a prerequisite of being a …
/r/MGTOW19/08/19 10:58 AM
1

It is written there. I do not see the contradictions you are talking about, how am I supposed to show you any? Do you people even stop being dishonest? Why didn't you quote the entire sentence? I didn't ask for just any faulty or poor translation, I already have plenty of examples of those, including willful mistranslations. I asked for faulty translation that lead to contradictions. You claimed there were, and you even conceded there were " contradictions", so where's the examples? When I talke…
/r/MGTOW19/08/19 10:45 AM
0

One example of faulty translation is a sentence talking about “birds” and the group it refers to has “bat” in it, but a bat is not considered a “bird”. That's a horrible example of a non-contradiction. Regardless if it's rendered as bird or winged creatures "bat" is literally right there in the text. Do you a single example of an actual contradiction being the product of faulty translation? I doubt you'll find one. On a similar not however, I could show you mistranslations in your Christian tran…
/r/MGTOW18/08/19 11:43 AM
3

You can literally go to the first "messianic prophecy" in the NT, compare it to the OT, then work your way through every single OT reference throughout the NT. There are your contradictions (not "contradictions"). And that's without getting started on the internal contradictions in especially the NT, but even the OT. And that's still nothing compared to the endless contradictions of Christian theology and doctrine. Do you even have one single example of a faulty translation producing a contradic…
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 09:13 PM
2

Dispensationalism clears up the apparent contradictions of scripture if you sincerely cared to try to make sense of it. Not really though.
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 09:09 PM
3

Are you braindead, cuck? No wonder the NPC meme took off like it did. I sorted the frontpage after hot and got a picture from Yosemite, some puppies, a motivational quote and some memes. There's your "hate group".
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 05:04 PM
2

Bram Stoker's Dracula certainly wasn't Jewish.
/r/MGTOW14/08/19 05:58 PM
1

It's not the same book though.
/r/MGTOW13/08/19 09:04 AM
7

Do you know the basic anatomy of a joke?
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 03:57 PM
6

I saw a literal professor in sport psychology (I think) on Swedish television a while ago arguing that men had no physical, biological advantage when it came to sports, and that the idea was merely based on a social contructs, and that in ten years there would be no gender division in sports, and we would look back and laugh at our silly, previous notions. This was supposed to be the voice of academia. No dissenting view allowed of course. These people are mentally ill cultics.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 12:49 PM
14

That's not quite true. Look at all the trannies dominating women's sports and infiltrating supposed female spaces.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 08:38 AM
18

US soldiers, sailors, and marines put themselves in harm's way when we ask them to... without question. Who's we?
/r/MGTOW11/07/19 08:33 PM
1

No book started Christianity, and the Bible consist of several books -- usually 66 or 73 -- and wasn't compiled and canonized until long after Christianity was spread.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 04:54 PM
1

The bonobo monkey culture proves documented history false? How exactly?
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 09:45 AM
2

Christianity and Christian theology can only exist in a cherry picked state.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 08:27 AM
3

Omg what religion does mgtow accept? I mean, you're literally promoting marriage in a sub dedicated for men going their own way, what did you expect?
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 08:26 AM
1

The West, Marriage, and the whole concept that a wife should be faithful and loving came from abrahamic religions. Marriage was practised before Christianity too, so that's not true.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 08:22 AM
1

Christianity is an idolatrous religion though.
/r/MGTOW09/07/19 08:06 AM
1

What kind of degenerate would downvote this?
/r/MGTOW21/06/19 05:10 PM
1

Humans can only produce human offspring, so what is it then?
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 09:17 AM
1

You're right, she's crossdressing her son. Alright. Not a lady. So you're an actual man or you're just a tranny pretending to be one, like you're pretending to be a Christian?
/r/MGTOW12/05/19 09:12 PM
1

I'm actually not Muslim so I can't confirm its authenticity. Yes, Catholics are annoying, but so are Christians in general. I personally find the often overlapping born again, Evangelical, and KJV only cultics to be by far the most annoying, arrogant, obnoxious and ignorant. And it's not just the idolatry, blasphemy, lies, rehashed paganism and endless contradictions that makes Christianity such a repulsive and perverse system, it's the fact that Christians can't even acknowledge the stench of t…
/r/MGTOW12/05/19 07:07 PM
1

1+1+1=? I'm just warning you regardless. God's day is inevitable.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 08:18 PM
4

Says the person that can't tell one from three. You would argue your case if you has actual faith. But suit yourself. Hopefully you'll do yourself a favour and check out the link.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 08:11 PM
3

You're not even arguing your case. You're also seemingly Catholic, so besides worshipping a human being as God, and the man-made trinity idol, your Church also "venerate" the theotokos, a plethora of inanimate icons, and even believe one of your Gods reincarnate as bread every Mass for you to cannibalize on and worship. You're literally worshipping a piece of bread as God. That's not a good idea. https://m.youtube.com/user/TheTrinityDelusion
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 08:05 PM
2

Oh, so Jesus is the only God then? Which God is he the son of then? God the father perhaps? Like I said, that's polytheism and idolatry. And yes, Muslims do indeed believe Jesus is the christ/messiah/mashiach/anointed, that's not even debateable.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 07:52 PM
1

son of God God made flesh Which one is it then? That's polytheism and idolatry. And there's no salvation in idolatry. And they do in fact believe Jesus is the christ (anointed one).
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 07:39 PM
1

There is indeed, and it breeds people like you. And even worse. And I doubt anyone here cares what you think anyway.
/r/MGTOW29/03/19 10:49 AM
3

Degeneracy is toxic and poisons society.
/r/MGTOW28/03/19 09:36 PM
4

The story about literal whore preserving her dignity and self-respect by not kissing her customers on the mouth.
/r/MGTOW03/03/19 02:18 AM
1

Empires rise and empires fall; the Byzantine wasn't the first, and it won't be the last. I might not be able to speak to a Byzantine citizen, but I'm sure able to speak to a Greek person, and enjoy the Byzantine cultural heritage. Point is, there's nothing even remotely suggesting that any Western country will embrace or be subjegated by Islam any time in the foreseeable future. Sure, there is a demographic shift, but the society is developing in a direction that is diametrically opposed to Isla…
/r/MGTOW17/02/19 07:12 PM
1

I see a direction, and that direction is degeneracy and decadence, much like the rest of the West. When was the last time you spoke with someone from the Kingdom of the Franks, the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire or the Rashidun Caliphate? Not sure what your point is.
/r/MGTOW17/02/19 06:46 PM
3

I've been wondering for years now which western EU country will be the first to go Islam and start the caliphate of Europistan. None. That's not the direction they're heading. And the second a society allows sodomite parenting I'm not sure it's worth saving anyway.
/r/MGTOW17/02/19 06:23 PM
1

Sure, but Isaiah 7:14 isn't a virgin prophecy. Or messianic.
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 04:53 PM
2

What's true and what's comforting are two very different things. And what's comforting about the notion of a Judgement Day and afterlife accountability exactly?
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 04:48 PM
2

Christianity specifically don't have a concrete law or set of rules, that's why there are so many disparate sects. And Western Protestantism is probably the most cucked religion known to man.
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 04:42 PM
3

That really wasn't on the agenda for Nicea.
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 04:31 PM
1

You can say shitty things about us but nothing positive. The first part is definitely true, but I'm pretty sure you can say positive things about Christians too. Exactly. The empathetic left is deafeningly silent here. Sure, but the only time the Christian right cares about it, is when they're attacking the left for being silent, or when they're advancing their own persecution narrative.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 08:23 PM
1

No, it mirrors the Masoretic text the KJV is translated from. And it's not about elitism, it's about using a precise and accurate language. That's especially important when dealing with Christianity.
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 02:36 AM
1

Isaiah didn't speak English, you mean the Masoretic Text. And the Christian Bible is evidently not a trustworthy compilation, and Christianity most certainly not a trustworthy religion.
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 12:30 AM
1

A silly old book that created our modern society basically. Influenced. Definitely didn't create it. And it's 66 or 73 books. Or even 81 according to some. Plus Paul followed Jesus and was called by him to his service, so this follows the creed. Allegedly. Paul's gospel is different from Jesus'.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 11:53 AM
1

No, he is a mortal human being that explicitly affirmed his God as the only God.
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 11:47 AM
1

I'm neither a native speaker of Hebrew or a Hebrew scholar. I've learned from actual scholar scholar though. I Googled one thing in this little debate we've had and that was whether or not it was echad or yachad that meant United as opposed to singular one because I get the two mixed up sometimes, Since Christians have popularized this lie you'll probably find a lot of results perpetuating that lie. You could also try a basic online course in Hebrew. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak74TpPCsHs&a…
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 09:20 PM
1

To say you are begotten of something or the son of someone, referred to being equal to that thing in jesus culture, like a human begat or fathered another human. That person isn't any less human than the one who had begotten him. This is why in Jewish culture at the time if a man married a gentile woman his children were Jews, but if a woman married a gentile her children were samaritans. So for him to say God was his father would be saying he is just as much God as God is. Complete and utter no…
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 08:25 PM
1

Nope. Echad means one (1), just like the word one means one in English. Yachid didn't take its present meaning in Hebrew until after it was influenced by Aramaic. That modern, filthy idolatrous lie was popularized by the degenerate polytheists Walter Martin, that almost certaintly didn't speak a word of Hebrew, and is perpetuated by other degenerate polytheists that doesn't speak a word of Hebrew. And if you really think it means unified why not just admit you're polytheists? I can't imagine any…
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 07:14 PM
1

One in purpose, a similar idiom employed by Paul in 1 Corinthians 3:8. Hence he also prayed that his followers (not Christians) become one as they are one, and one with them (John 17:21-23). Or do you expect becoming God too any time soon? And one what exactly? You're still a polytheist worshipping a mortal man as your God, even though he affirmed his God is the only God.
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 05:24 PM
1

Nope, he explicitly identified his God as the only God of Abraham, as is done throughout the NT. Only pagan polytheists worship a mortal man that have his own God, as God. And according to Hebrews 1:1-2 Jesus didn't speak in the OT, only the Father.
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 02:09 PM
4

The holiday is a pagan holiday after all. Well, Christianity is a pagan religion.
/r/MGTOW26/12/18 01:58 PM
1

ROTFLMAO. Solid argumentation. There most certainly are... you just don't call them "creeds." I asked for concrete examples. You really don't know diddly squat about ANY religions do you I do, and I almost certainly know more about Christian doctrine, theology, history and scripture than you. ... all you're doing is regurgitating the banal, bog-standard, atheist talking points (the almost "catechismal" responses). That prepackaged, copy-and-paste kneejerk reply doesn't make a whole lot of sense.…
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 12:21 PM
1

Yes junior, it is. But as I said: "in denial and DISMISSIVE of the various contradictions." Like what? I'm talking about asserting direct, undeniable, concrete self-contradictions as doctrinal truths; eternally begotten, eternal generation, fully man, fully God, etc. There are no atheist creeds of that nature, and I doubt you'll find anything similar in any other religious tradition.
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 10:34 AM
1

No, John's prologue does not say the logos was Yah, and Jesus is definitely not the the Father/YHWH. And there's no code in Matthew 24:36, Jesus doesn't know the hour plain and simply.
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 10:19 AM
1

I understa and it fullt well, you obviously don't. "My Father and your Father, to my God and your God." It's not that complicated.
/r/MGTOW23/12/18 10:16 AM
1

I don't think you have anywhere NEAR enough experience to know. But I do. Which then makes your claims essentially nothing more than bigotry. Ok. That's fine by me. Liar. No. Or the much broader belief that "science" is (in essence) infallible/always right... and yet also stating that it is "always changing" and yet again that it is "self-correcting." That's not a self-contradiction. The EXACT same thing can just as easily be said of the vast majority of "atheists" -- moreover most of their "str…
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 08:24 AM
1

Sure you do, and sure you have. Maybe you should study some basic Christian theology, scripture and doctrine too while you're at it. Are you a modalist or not? Did he pray to himself? Was he His own father and his own son? Was he pleased with himself and found himself worthy? And Paul uses a similar idiom in 1 Corinthians 3:8 too btw. And Jesus is explicitly identified as not being the Father in the NT, and the Father is explicitly identified as alone being God. And no, they don't have the same …
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 08:10 AM
2

You're joking, right? John 14:28, John 20:17. I thought you were a student of scripture?
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 07:58 AM
1

LOL, have you been in/around any large group of "atheists." (Cf /r/atheism etc). Christians are worse, and it's not even close. The term "Christians" is a massively broad. Right, and when I say Christians I mean it in the broadest sense. The vast majority of both are massively (and arguably about equally) ignorant... and both are in virtually complete denial of that. And few religious practitioners are quite as ignorant as Christians are. Atheists too have their own inherent contradictions, and …
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 11:59 AM
0

Nobody fulfills that meme like Christians does however. Their creeds literally require of them to acknowledge evident contradictions as truth. I've described debating Christians as chatting with AI chatbots years before the NPC meme.
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 09:03 AM
1

Who's being ignorant here when you think Jesus and the Father are one and the same? Have you even read the gospel? I'm guessing you're confusing the trinity for modalism like most Christians do.
/r/MGTOW21/12/18 08:44 AM
1

Like this? Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. Philippians 2:12 And which God, Christians usually have three to choose from?
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 09:19 PM
-1

He was God He wasn't/isn't though, and never claimed to be.
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 09:10 PM
0

Huh? He prayed to himself, called himself his God, and said he was greater than himself? He was his own son, and the father of himself?
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 09:08 PM
1

I did read it (hastily), that's how I know "Hollywood" (Jeremy Boreing) "invented" him (gave him a makeover) after he'd already been a high-profile political commentator for years. It's just a ridiculous and misleading headline. Same kind of thing has been done with any number of different people left, right or center; political and non-political. There's a lot more of a "machine" that works behind the scenes on all this stuff than most people have ANY clue about. Of course, there's always machi…
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 11:49 AM
1

Hollywood "invented" Ben Shapiro after he published his fifth books, became editor at-large of Breitbart and appeared on Piers Morgan?
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 10:00 AM
1

The only place where spirituality refers to a belief in the supernatural is in the debate between theists, primarily Christians, and atheists. In Buddhism it is used to refer to the cultivation of our minds, or spirits to be more in-sync with reality, and thus more at peace. The same is basically true in Hindu, and Sufi circles. I'm pretty sure becoming in-sync with "reality" is the opposite of Buddhism. And Sufism and Hinduism and theistic religions, they believe in spirits and the supernatural…
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 09:18 AM
1

"The word “spirit” comes from the Latin spiritus, which in turn is a translation of the Greek pneuma, meaning “breath.” Around the 13th century, the term became bound up with notions of immaterial souls, supernatural beings, ghosts, etc." Except those words were bound up with notions of immaterial souls and beings at least a thousand years before that in biblical texts. And it was hardly nonsupernatural in Greek philopophy either. But Harris seems more concerned about reclaiming the "spiritualit…
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 08:28 AM
1

There is a Hebrew Bible, and no, I don't mean the Pentateuch, I mean the entire Hebrew Bible. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Bible And there's no such prophecy anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 06:33 PM
0

The Christian God. *Gods, Christians believe in three. And the OP just says God. Only Christianity. Wonder why that is? Because it's culturally relevant.
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 07:36 AM
1

No, I worship Yahweh. Is it idolatry when we accept the over 150 different manifestations of Yahweh in the Tanakh? Nope. You started of claiming the person Jesus was YHWH manifest in the flesh, as a human being, then you retracted that as said Jesus is not God, but God merely indwelled the same vessel as him. Which one is it? And why don't you worship other vessels indwelled by God? And how was God "in the flesh" exactly? Nope, she did. Jesus never was his name. That is a transliteration of the …
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 07:16 AM
6

There's no such prophecy anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 06:45 AM
0

No, as I already said in a previous post. Did you downvote my comment? You do realize downvotes don't magically invalidate the factuality of a comment? It's not that I care, I'm just trying to understand the thought process.
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 06:44 AM
3

That might be true, but Western mainline Protestantism still makes Sweden look like a beacon of traditionalism in comparison. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/01/church-of-england-womens-group-bishops https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/26/transgender-people-encouraged-become-priests-church-england/
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 12:03 AM
-1

Well that clears up quite a lot. It must mean you're an antisemitic anti-Judaism/Netzir/Christian theist then. Nope. You're not too perceptive. I am most certainly a Nazarite as I took the vow of the Nazir. You worship a man as God, that idolatry. No, I worship Yahweh who manifested in the flesh. And God is not man, mortal or Jesus. That's idolatry. That is what Im'manu'el means. Yahweh is with us. No, it's means God was with Ahaz and Judah against the military coalition of Ephraim and Syria. Yo…
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 11:50 PM
-2

I'm not Jewish and you're not a Nazarite. You worship a mortal man as God, instead of God. That's willful idolatry. Maybe you should dial it down a bit if you can't even read and understand explicit, straighforward scripture? The prophecy was given to Ahaz personally, to be fulfilled within his days. The child itself isn't even the sign, it's that Ahaz' enemies -- Syria and Ephraim -- would fall at the hands of Assyria when the child reaches a certain age of maturity: 15 He will eat curds and ho…
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 11:00 PM
5

If you want your house to be raided by Christians of all denominations, say Mary was raped by God. Doubt it. Have you seen the state of Western Christendom lately? Mainline Protestantism in particular is a complete joke: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/24/church-of-sweden-to-stop-referring-to-god-as-he-or-lord
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 10:47 PM
-5

Immanuel was a (human) child born during.the reign of king Ahaz and the Syro-Ephraimite War, 8th century BC, long before the already fulfilled prophecy was misappropriated and repurposed in Matthew. It's not a messianic prophecy, and it's definitely not about some pagan, incarnated God-man. And Jesus is not YHWH.
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 10:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter