TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shemademedoit1 Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by shemademedoit1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Then go make a post on your belief "most men can get casual sex" and see how people on this sub react lmao. There's a reason trp/purplepill/etc all came to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:26 PM
1

Prostitutes don't count
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:24 PM
1

The guy i replied to is talking about ease of getting casual sex. Not forming long lasting relationships. They are entirely different things
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 12:50 PM
–

To be more precise, it is more unequal. Most women are attracted to a minority of guys. If you're in that minority then good for you you are a "winner" of modern hookup culture. If you are a regular guy then good luck lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:53 AM
1

Lmao women love attention that's why they cant emotionally share a man. If get it if its purely casual but if they want companionship and shit very few women would actually be okay with it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:32 AM
–

Those aren’t my matches, those are likes, id be really lucky if i matched with all those women. Im pretty restrictive with my matches cuz im “looking for the one”. Also i did buy bumble premium so im sure that helps (you get seen more often and thats a big deal)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:39 AM
–

Asian
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 06:53 AM
–

I came back to this sub temporarily because i recently broke up with my gf and was gonna start dating again. Well i signed back onto bumble and i was worried after 7 months it would be tough getting back in but again time and time proves that the blue pill works Heres my screenshot before going snooze mode (found a girl i really like and although were just chatting im not the kind of guy to date multiple girls at once. Ill go back on the app if this doesnt work out, obviously) Blue pill always w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 06:46 AM
1

Im not denying pretty privilege, but my point is about whether your dating strategy will actually change. It won't change much cuz your standards go up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 10:05 AM
2

Nah science shows that attractive people tend to settle down with other attractive people (or wealthy in the case of guys). If what you were saying is true then the science should show that attractive people get with non attractive people because theyll take whoeber they can easily get.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:30 AM
2

Yeah but it doesn't mean you'll want to date them. You'll be looking for models and shit
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:20 AM
1

Your attractiveness certainly matters but it impacts your standards more than your dating policy. For example if I was more attractive my strategy still remains the same: meeting women on apps or in public, trying to find common ground with a woman when im dating her, etc. The only thing that changes significantly is the type of women considered "in my radar" or not. So that affects the outcome of what women I get with but the core dating strategy is unchanged. Of course, being extra attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:36 AM
9

Definitely not on my FYP bro. Most of the stuff I get are couple memes and shit. I don't even search it up i think it's cuz my gf shares them to me so much the algorithm thinks I want them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:57 AM
1

Sex is different for men than it is for women. Yet you want equality in this matter do you not? Isn't that what you were advocating for? I want certain aspects to be equal (e.g. if men don't get slut shamed, women shouldn't too). I don't want all aspects to be equal (e.g. men penetrate during sex and women receive during sex, this doesn't need to change.) So, if a man sleeps with 100 women... he does so because 100 women see him as high quality. If a woman sleeps with 100 men... this does not im…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:43 PM
1

Doing a masculine act doesn't override all of a woman's femininity. For example, punching someone is a masculine act. But if I see a feminine person punch someone, does that mean they are "spoilt" and are no longer feminine? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:15 PM
1

You can still be feminine even if some of the things you do isn't feminine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:00 PM
1

How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:53 PM
1

Im not saying holding an opinion is oppression. Verbal harrassment can be oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:52 PM
1

No that's not how I'm describing equality. If you think that's what I mean by equality then you are mistaken. That is not what I mean by equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:17 PM
1

No, I think if anyone wants to surgically modify themselfes then they should be allowed to do so. I'm not saying they must do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:29 PM
1

Men and women aren't equal yet. Women still get slut shamed, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:53 AM
2

Most of those involve men who know theybe left their biological child with a woman. My point is that a man is more conscious about being cheated on because finding out you've been raising someone elses son is particularly devastating
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:15 AM
0

For that statistic to be relevant we need to know what proportion of single mothers are single because theyve cheated on their husband and their husband left them to raise kids on their own. Otherwise you cant draw any conclusions about men avoiding the consequences of cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:58 AM
-1

The single mother statistic is only relevant if they became single mothers if they cheated on their partner and were forced to raise the child themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:52 AM
3

Why It appears that more men believe their partner is cheating? Men are more afraid of getting cheated on because the consequences are severe (raising a kid that isn't your own) The consequences used to be as severe for a woman (losing your economic security) but that's been mitigated heavily now that women participate in the workforce. So more severe consequences = higher rates of suspicion
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:49 AM
1

Humans can be ugly when no one's looking, my man, especially when you live alone. Women don't wear make up, men don't put on deodorant or fix their hair. Nothing wrong with it as long as they fix themselves up before being seen by other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:42 AM
3

Dude im a guy and i just wear boxers at home half the time. Like not even a shirt on. That's as slobby as it gets no one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:29 AM
3

Slides and hoodies aren't masculine only lmao. Do you expect women to wear skirts the whole time even in their house cmon.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:20 AM
2

Nah plenty more hyperfeminine OF girls out there too compared to the past
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 12:54 AM
6

Feminism is about equality. That means allowing women to be more masculine if they want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 12:38 AM
2

There is because (tradfem) women generally are attracted to more "exclusive" guys, like celebrities. In fact there are plenty of women who gain an interest in a guy who is in a relationship because of the social validation effect. Im sure there are women who are only attracted to guys who have already express an interest in them but this must be a tiny minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:40 AM
2

No friendzoning is when a man expresses romantic interest in a woman but the woman rejects him by making it clear she views him as a platonic friend only.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:33 AM
5

Friendzoning is still far too prevalent for your statement to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:28 AM
5

Nah most women reject simps. That's why friendzoning is so prevalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:26 AM
-21

Ok she can keep the makeup on 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 02:23 PM
2

Men are taller than women, so more men being in the nba than women is fine. Men aren't smarter than women, so it doesn't make sense that they get more promotions into top roles than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 04:58 PM
1

Engineering and Construction aren't problems cuz women choose not to do those careers. So it's understandable. That's not the case for corporate jobs: finance has 46% women but finance ceos are only 10%. So there's a problem. In these industries Women are half the workers but not half the leaders. It's worse for other industries like healthcare/teaching. Women make up 70% of workers in teaching but only 50% of women make it principal level. You'd expect it to be the same. 90% of construction wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 04:32 PM
-1

If what you're saying is true then there should be more women than men in these roles already (since women are getting all these advantages). But that's not the case
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 04:03 PM
1

No ones stopping women from doing construction jobs (well...), so there's no issue there. But there are ppl stopping women from doing wall street / ceo jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:18 PM
–

Are your views on the right to self autonomy really that absolute? What if it's you and your starving children, and you have to choose between knocking out a wealthy man and taking his keys to steal food from his store vs letting you and your kids die from starvation tonight. I know it's an extreme example but I want to test if there are limits to your respect for third party bodily autonomy. That's your trolley problem. Do you still respect bodily autonomy there?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:18 PM
3

Disgruntled men are timeless, but I definitely feel like the heat is higher compared to last year. Or maybe I just haven't experienced toxicity in a while and need time to adjust back haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:13 PM
–

Ok let's introduce the possibility of these people being a threat to your safety. Let's say these people wanted the invaders to come and genocide you. To make it more believable imagine a situation where an enemy wants to genocide a specific ethnicity in your country (your ethnicity), and there are a minority of people from a separate ethnicity who actually are okay with this happening, because they will be spared and they want your nation to be taken over by the invaders. Now that we've introdu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:13 PM
–

But there will always be at some people who wouldn't want to fight back even in those situations. Would you be okay with using the threat of jail to force them into fighting?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:15 AM
–

Do you have any exceptions to this general belief? Presumably there are obvious exceptions like "unless the invading force will genocide me and my people". Anything other exceptions you can think of?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:29 AM
2

What's up with the anti feminism in the sub? Ive been gone for 6 months (got in a relationship, now might break up with her) and this place is a lot more anti-feminist before. Im seeing constant hate and toxicity. Did something happen to piss the red pills off lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:20 AM
1

He might have a mom/sister who he saw treated badly by men and so might be a feminist because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:14 AM
0

There are witnesses who witnessed him rape her? That would definitely be enough. If there's chat lot where he apologises for having sex with her even though he knew she didn't consent, then that would be enough too. Im surprised he's not in jail already with evidence like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/23 09:11 AM
2

Men are more likely to declare war. This doesn't make war exclusive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 04:49 AM
3

Men are more likely to be violent. This doesn't make violence exclusive to men
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 04:47 AM
5

This is because men are normally in power. Not because only men have a desire to go to war. If there were only women on earth we would still have wars because the underlying causes for war (fighting over resources or political control) still exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 04:43 AM
5

That's only for the aggressor. There's still the country being attacked that needs to find people to defend it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/23 03:36 AM
2

Need is too strong of a word. Having relationship experience will probably increase your chances with women. But if you are already very successful with women, which is what your post seems, then who cares? Keep living life the way you want
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 04:15 PM
3

Women usually react more badly to "weirdness" than guys do. I mean guys also react negatively to weirdness, but it's not that big a deal, for women it's a much bigger deal for some reason. Anyway in your case women would immediately assume that you've never been in a relationship because there's something wrong with you that makes other women not want to be in a relationship with you. Of course you will say that actually women do want to be in a relationship with you, but u just reject them, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 03:46 PM
6

How do you know the rule still exists if there are so many exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 05:15 AM
3

Dude if he's still willing to have sex even after seeing her in real life (and finding out that she faked her looks) then he's basically saying "yeah you faked your looks, But I'm fine with this"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 02:48 AM
–

As its totally okay to say men are rapists, No it's not. Well, you can say "Statistically X% of men commit rape", but you can't say "Being a man means you naturally want to rape people" Note how both of those sub-statements can be inferred from the vague statement "men are rapists". The first sub-statement is okay, the second one is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 07:55 AM
–

Sentiments like "only white people can be racist" and "every white person IS racially biased whether they acknowledge it or not" are not only supported but even encouraged to great extent in academia and popular media. Two things. So those statements taken within context don't mean what they say at first glance. Let's look at the first one: Only white people can be racist. That claim doesn't actually mean that the only human beings capable of experience hatred or prejudice towards another race a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 07:17 AM
–

I'm glad you had that experience. But to clarify, when people talk about the "wall" for women they are talking about trends for women in general, rather than case-by-case situations. The trend being that a woman is more likely to be seen as physically attractive when she was 25 compared to the same woman 45 years later. That doesn't mean the older version of her is not attractive. It just means a younger version of her physical body would be seen as more physically attractive than an older versi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 06:21 AM
–

I'll look at one of your examples, since the 3 examples you give can vary widely in meaning depending on context. So let's look at the statement "white people are complicit in racial oppression". The first step would be to check whether it fits into the definition of generalisation, and the second step is to check whether it is the immoral kind of generalisation. Step 1 is a bit tricky, because the phrase can be read two ways. It can be read in a factual manner. I.e. "Factually speaking, racial …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 06:05 AM
–

Like...white people? But There is no stereotype that white people are stupid
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:41 AM
–

Whereas the example about "such and such group of people are stupid" is a stereotype that society deems acceptable for certain groups but not others. You could say it's that inconsistency that I find problematic and insincere. Which groups of people does society find this acceptable with?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:13 AM
–

Don't go for those women. The obesity thing works in your favour btw, since 35% of men are overweight, while 27% of women are overweight. This means american men are cancelling themselves out of the dating game more than women are, which should increase your chances (assuming you aren't overweight yourself lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:12 AM
–

Yeah, but there are some additional nuances to consider, which makes it more than an argument between "Lower inherent value but higher mobility vs higher inherent value but lower mobility". Men's attractiveness curve starts lower than a woman, but peaks far later. Women hit the wall far earlier. More over, men don't really hit a wall, they go down a mountainslope. Women hit the wall and the affect is drastic within a few years. That difference in the curve is itself much more in favour of men th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:10 AM
–

Maybe that itself (a few pounds) is already too much for them to accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:05 AM
–

Why should hope be lost in the first place. We man at least have a huge amount of control over our social status and wealth. Women on the other hand, are far more bound by their genetic physical attractiveness, and this gives them much less wiggle room.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 04:56 AM
–

I think they don't want too much muscle, maybe they don't consider it aesthetic. Despite the fat loss benefits of having muscle.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 04:54 AM
–

There are super popular men like Adam Levine and Will Smith who got absolutely shat on for their stuff. I think it would damage George Clooney for sure, since part of his celeb identity is the cool and unphased guy. If that image is broken it could absolutely destroy his career.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 04:53 AM
–

How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 04:24 AM
–

I wouldn't say "by default", but yeah, men have to compete for women, 1 man can impregnate multiple women, doesn't really work the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 04:23 AM
–

I think it depends in what way you generalise them and how you act on this generalisation. There's stuff which is not acceptable, like assuming people of a certain race to be stupid and therefore choosing not to work or hire them. And there's stuff which is acceptable, like assuming people of a certain gender love big boobies and therefore choosing to put attractive people on your advertising billboard for your alcoholic drink. Of course, from a fundamental perspective, generalisation is "bad" i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:44 AM
2

The poes law reference means you were being sarcastic, right? (Don't woosh me). Were you being sarcastic about your whole comment or just the height thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 02:19 PM
0

Which uncomfortable truths
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 12:41 PM
1

How are you going about "trying" to get from 180cm to 188cm? Also 15%bf is good, but 66kg that implies a lean body mass of 57 which is very small imo for someone 180cm tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/23 09:25 AM
1

But is this really true in OP's sense? OP is saying a 0.5% guy (1 in 200) can easily have a one-sided polyamourous relationship. But can you find examples in reality to corroborate this? I can find emperors or kings in history, sure. But those are not 1 in 200 odds lmao. Even 0.00001% men like Elon musk get divorced on. He had a prenup with grimes too so it's not like Makenzie bezos where she could take half his wealth for herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:53 PM
2

You don't understand. Attractiveness is only one component of value. (in the example of the cars, a higher price tag car). I'll do it in a guy's pov to make it simpler. Compare a 7/10 virgin vs 10/10 millionnaire heiress girl that gets a train ran on her every other night before meeting you. Who would YOU rather pick? Of course the first one. The vast majority of dudes on this sub, myself included, would pick the first one. Attractiveness is literally just 1 aspect of "true value". Same with car…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 02:14 PM
2

Even if I had a million dollars. If I need a tractor I will buy a tractor. In the same vein, even if a girl was a supermodel, she could end up picking the funny goofy guy who completes her, instead of some george clooney dude. There are plenty of high value female + regular dude couples out there, and the very existence of these show that your claim isn't as generalised as you make it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 01:59 PM
4

No. If a person's needs are different, they could very well pick a cheaper car over a more expensive one. For example, a farmer would choose a pickup over a sportscar. A hiker would prefer the 4-wheel drive toyota over a sportscar etc. The price tag is basically the equivalent of the "how hot are you out of 10". But when actually picking lifelong partners people are heavily influenced by stuff like religion, values etc. That's not just women btw, even average men will reject a 10/10 woman if she…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 01:46 PM
15

Dude I get what you're saying but your example is bad because many people will absolutely pick an affordable toyota over a high end merc because of the reliability, ease of repair, and availability of spare parts. Cars are literally an example of why one measure of value (cost) does not apply universally to all customers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 10:43 AM
1

I wonder what kind of men older sex workers tend to settle down with. Since decent men are scarce, after all. Im a "finance bro" and i couldn't imagine myself being in a relationship with someone like that. Not because they aren't attractive, but stuff like the fact that that kind of woman would never be accepted in my social circles. I definitely have had fling though, and those are nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 06:02 AM
2

It may change their perspectives and all, but still most men here will remain with their dicks dry and the girls with cats to feed. Yeah but that's because adult humans generally have a hard time altering their ingrained behaviour. It's not an issue unique to this sub, and therefore not something you should criticise this sub over. It's like a guy comes and asks, how to get laid, and a girl tells him "stop being a mysoginist", and he follows the advice and, besides maybe being a better person he…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:32 AM
-1

I however believe people arguing aren't coming from a point of trying to either help others or expand their view If you believed something to be true, then convincing someone else of that viewpoint would be "helping them", since it's helping them see the light, if you get what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:16 AM
0

People here rarely say what they believe, instead they are mostly trying to win arguments. I disagree with this statement. I think the vast majority of participants here say things which they do genuinely believe. It's just that people believe so strongly in their world-view that they will argue to defend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:12 AM
1

The discussion isn't pointless. It still exposes you to other people's perspectives, even if those perspectives are based on personal experience. That exposure itself can be a valuable learning experience for you
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 09:04 AM
5

He's not talking about how fair the market is, he's talking about how free it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 02:27 AM
2

Who's the second girl though 👀
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:14 AM
8

That's not the problem. It takes about 3-5 years of that regime to get to your natural genetic limits. Of course. Totally doable. Im doing that right now. But it's not something anyone can just do. Years of dedication is the hadd part.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 12:59 AM
–

The comparison works because you are saying "if something only naturally appears in a prepubescent, then it is wrong to be attracted to it" And that can apply to clean shaven beards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:28 PM
–

The "wax the body" part doesn't matter. As long as a part of their body (in this case a clean-shaven face) can only naturally show up in a pre-pubescent boy, then it's the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 03:17 PM
–

NOBODY who says they like younger women says they like hairy women. The only demographic of people with completely hairless bodies are prepubescent children. This is like saying "Women who prefer clean shaven men are actually interested in pre-pubescent boys, because that's the only time when a man naturally has 0 facial hair" Cmon lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/23 02:57 PM
–

Yeah ive done it too. But it's consensual and feels good so whatever lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:48 PM
–

Well yeah, if you don't want to grow old with someone and If all u want is to always have someone pretty then marriage is not for you lol. But be warned, cuz it's a lot more expensive to go through hot girl after hot girl for the rest of your life than to settle down with someone. But if you can afford that, why not. You won't have biological kids, or if you do, it'll be hard to have a relationship with them if you don't settle down with their mom. But meh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:20 PM
–

If the person you marry is giving you a lifetime of misery, then it's on you for picking the wrong wife lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 12:08 PM
–

Even if this idea were to be implemented, there are likely to be unintended consequences which will further exacerbate the problem. For example, knowing that having a daughter has a 2% chance of having a miserable life, people might be choose to abort female children and this can negatively skew the birthrate over the long term. Moreover, how do we choose which guys do it with the woman? From a purely logical perspective you would pick guys who have strong genetics, such as genius IQ, good physi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/23 08:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter