sherehitewasright Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Ladies, do you get aroused when watching mainstream porn like men do? Do you think women reproduce with their asses? This whole thread has been you going penis+ass, even justifying it by saying it's how we reproduce. Your brain has truly been broken by porn. The homologue to the penis is not the woman's "booty", by any metric. Vagina is the main reproductive organ in women, but even then, the homologue to penis isn't vagina but clitoris. "If I understand you correctly, the mere sight of a vulva covering a scrotum and taint with her thighs smacking against the man'…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/07/26 03:53 AM
3	Ladies, do you get aroused when watching mainstream porn like men do? What? Women aren't "straight" men who sexually objectify/pornify women's asses while also being absolutely obsessed with other men's dicks, therefore women aren't visual? My Lawd... Let me reverse this: If you see a porn scene with a man's big booty bouncing on a vulva (with nothing else visible), would it turn you on? It's one of my favorite things to watch, so I'm curious if men enjoy it as much as women do. If men don't enjoy watching a man's booty bouncing on a pussy as much as women do, the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/07/26 03:40 AM
7	Can you explain what emasculation feels like? Or is? Yep, the difference is male dominance, sexism, misogyny... He's less of a man, and therefore closer to being a mere woman (inferior, degraded, humiliated, feminine, insufficiently masculine, "like a girl/woman"...) or even worse, even inferior to, ruled over by, insulted by, etc those inferior beings born female.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/06/26 08:25 PM
2	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Hello sweetheart snuggie bear baby boy. Do you also think that sites that sell/provide access to guns, alcohol, marijuana, gambling, recordings of real murders... should enable getting those products with a simple click of proclaiming to be 18, that there's lots of ways for parents to block those sites, and that asking for IDs before getting guns, gambling, cigarettes, etc (online and otherwise) is a awful invasion of privacy? Is a physical porn store invading your privacy by asking for ID? By h…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/06/26 05:20 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Pornography is recorded prostitution and the sex of it. Depictions of prostitution and prostitution existed long before the modern porn industry (which kicked off with Playboy and quickly got more explicit eg Hustler, became uncensored with the internet, etc). Even ancient Greece had pornographic art, depicting prostitution, gang rape, the sexual abuse of boys, etc. I don't think "hardcore porn from the 1960s on" is the root, I think patriarchal religion fundamentally is the ideological root. I'…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/06/26 07:21 AM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Outside of the US, in the developed world, health care is paid by the state. America is uniquely in a right wing, corporatist, neoliberal, beholden to drug companies, the NRA, etc rut it cannot get out of. We know health care isn't inherently like the American model, because the rest of the developed world isn't the American model, isn't paid by the individual. There is no country where prostitution including porn is not exploitative, with genuine consent, not traumatic, etc in the main. You rem…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/06/26 06:27 AM
2	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Pimping is simply profiting unjustly and/or excessively off of the prostitution of others. So yes, women in stripping do generally experience pimping eg the club argues they are independent contractors and the women have to pay all sorts of fees and fines. That's not even getting into the fact that strip clubs are generally run by organised crime eg Hell's Angels in North America and serve as fronts, to launder money for more overtly illegal activity like escorting, brothels, drugs. I said a few…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/06/26 05:42 AM
2	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Fascinating that people who don't trust pornographers (eg tube sites and their parent companies) with their own ID trust them to not post/make/host/sell/distribute/etc porn of those who are underage, who are being coerced, forced, deceived, etc, don't know they're being filmed, don't consent (even just nominally) to the sex itself, don't consent (even just nominally) to its uploading and sale, etc. That they assume they are too shady for the former but so upstanding, ethical, concerned... they'd…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 11:57 PM
2	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry (just fyi, think you meant will increase not lessen the number)	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 10:07 PM
2	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Jessie Rogers. I remember her doing things with antipornography.org (run by another woman who left porn and an abusive man) around 15 years ago. James Deen and his accusers like Ashley Fires also come quickly to mind. The industry blacklists, harasses, defames, etc anyone currently or formerly in porn who speaks out against it in any significant way including James Deen's victims. Ashley Fires and others have spoken about this. One woman who disclosed about him even either overdosed on drugs or …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 10:00 PM
9	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry It's so crazy to me the way most porn consumers/pro-porners have complete meltdowns at the spectre of porn sites having the same age and identity verification regulations as brick and mortar porn stores, online gambling, online alcohol and pot buying, etc. also crazy to me how they generally see no issue with children seeing porn, they don't understand that showing kids porn is grooming, etc.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 09:51 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry AI relies on real porn to create its own images of porn though. It also turns specific, identifiable women into "live action" (that look like real photos, videos) pornography without even their knowledge let alone consent, that is then shared online, texted to others, claimed to be real, it seems real, etc.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 09:48 PM
3	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Your point is, well, pointless. You think you would have been fine, doing something you never did. It's an idea, a fantasy in your head at best, that you're trying to act means you would have been fine, untraumatized, fully consenting to everything, enjoying things... had you actually, in reality done porn. And this means you can use that point to say no one should criticize porn, no one say porn isn't a great time for the women in it, etc. Porn is all about ideas, feelings, anyway. If you don't…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 06:59 PM
4	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry "I thought about it and assume I would have been fine always and not dehumanized ever in my hypothetical scenario so clearly that's how it would have happened. So all women actually in porn are consenting, fine, not dehumanized, feel great... How dare you tell other women what they should feel." The irony 😂	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 06:46 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry "Real couples" is obviously another marketing ploy of recent years. Eg includes johns with the women they hire to tolerate them, pimps with "their" women, two people put together by a pornographer/pimp, two people getting together to make porn who weren't previously/currently in a relationship outside of porn... Same with "amateur" although that one has been around as a ploy for decades.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 06:43 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry So you unwittingly said your boyfriend and his family are literally pimping women (profiting unfairly and/or disproportionately from their prostitution inc stripping) and you think that makes him a great feminist? We are never getting out of patriarchy if pimping women intergenerationally passes for feminist... The few women who do speak out who are still in porn get harassed, blacklisted, etc. eg James Deen's accusers like Ashley Fires. The ones out of it are more likely to speak out but they t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 06:35 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry Yikes! Many men and boys report orgasm from various sorts of sexual abuse, so no, ejaculation/orgasm does not equal free informed desirous consent, enjoyment, passion, exhibitionism... Ejaculation/orgasm can even be traumatic. That's even leaving aside the fact even male orgasm is often faked in porn (eg ejaculation without orgasm, fluids that look like semen, he acts/performs an orgasm, another scene possibly even with another man is spliced in) or forced (eg he jacks himself, uses drugs, they …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 06:28 PM
1	Antiporn is usually motivated by misandry And here it is: you think women's bodies are inherently pornography for male use and consumption, so of course any image of a nude woman is "lewd" and therefore pornography.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/06/26 05:57 PM
10	Ultimate explanation of weird female heterosexuality Are you the guy who posts over and over about this. Thinking all women watch lesbian porn and can't fathom the fact gay/mm porn is the first or second most popular type of porn among women who watch porn. (Many to most women, depending on age, politics, etc don't watch porn fyi.) Think you have OCD about this, dude. I will just add that most straight porn is already fundamentally gay in some real senses. It's not really heterosexual. It's not really about women and their pleasure, orgasms, clito…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/05/26 12:33 AM
2	Is it true that most women don't enjoy getting pounded during sex? Nah, the vagina isn't the homologue to the penis. The clitoris is.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/05/26 12:58 AM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision So many people are talking out of their ass on these supposed homologue/circumcision threads. The so called g spot is the confluence of the underside of the clitoral body and the Skene's glands. Which are homologous to part of the penile shaft and the prostate, respectively. They call the penile frenulum the "male g spot" but the actual homologue to the former is the clitoral frenulum.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 01:05 AM
0	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision By your logic, most clitoral stimulation is not clitoral stimulation. Even most glans stimulation is not as that is typically over the clitoral hood/is simultaneous glans and hood stimulation with the hood as a "barrier" between the stimulation (vibe, tongue, mouth/lips, thigh, dick, pelvis, stomach, fingertips, palm...), and the glans. Or otherwise "cushioned" eg by inner labia, outer labia. Most women find concerted, direct, pinpoint stimulation of the glans too much, some can't take such dire…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/04/26 12:44 AM
1	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision The most innervated parts are external (glans, body, hood, inner labia). And that's more than 10% of it. Those women were usually "only" mutilated in less severe ways (eg still have part of their hood, still have much to all of the clitoral body, still have inner labia, the glans was pricked/cut but not removed, and/or the dorsal nerve (innervating the glans, body, hood) and pudendal nerve (innervating the inner labia) weren't damaged...). If more severely mutilated (eg the glans, hood and body …	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/26 04:50 PM
0	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision If it's orgasm, it's still clitoral. The glans isn't the only part of the clitoris. Eg stimulation of the clitoral body inc the underside, hood, inner labia, the bulbs (underneath the labia), etc leading to orgasm is still not just clitoral orgasm but clitoral stimulation. Not to mention that even stimulation of other erogenous zones arouses/engorges the full clitoris, causes signals to be sent back and forth between clitoris, spine, brain and those zones (nipples, mouth, mound, inner thighs, an…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/26 04:31 PM
0	It’s hypocritical to be against FGM but not care about circumcision Yes, clitoral hood cutting is worse. The foreskin is the equivalent to only the bottom 1/5 of the clitoral hood. Around 80% of the clitoral hood is homologous to the skin of the penile shaft. For male genital cutting to be worse, you'd have to deskin the penis shaft too. I'm anti-circumsizion. But the movement relies on denying reality and blaming women for it being normalized. When in the first place, it was created, driven, popularized, justified... by patriarchal religion and patriarchal fami…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/04/26 04:06 PM
41	Why do heterosexual women often have problems with not wanting to have sex? The definition of sex as piv and what flows from that eg other phallocentricism. Denial, shaming, erasure, punishment of the clitoris and clit/vulva-centric sex. Denial of female sexuality that's not vicarious, phallocentric, androcentric, submissive, masochistic, high risk low reward, etc. The belief men have sex with their penises, and only those and women with their vaginas and other orifices, not clitorises/vulvas. That the clitoris is so pointless, worthless, nothing at all to do with sex t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	22/02/26 01:45 AM
2	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? "Satisfaction" is also a matter of expectations being met. It is bad for comparison because different groups, different individuals have different expectations, often wildly so. If someone has low expectations and they're met, they're satisfied. If someone has high expectations and they're met, satisfied. But person A's expectations could be on the damn ground (eg sex doesn't hurt much, he feels good and orgasms) in comparison to B (sex feels great, it's what I want, I'm safe and comfortable, I …	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 06:22 PM
0	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? You don't think women have an easier time orgasming during things like cunnilingus, vulva/clit on balls, taint, buttocks, thighs... than men do? Because if nothing I wrote is true, men must be coming more and easier from said sex acts (eg from having their mouth, balls, taint, bum, thighs... humped, sucking, licking, rubbing those parts on women) than women (from getting clitoral/vulval stimulation from those parts on men).	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 02:45 PM
1	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? ... No. For a big one that immediately shows your assertions false is how many orgasms in a session. If Woman A has sex once a month, for 2 plus hours and has 10 orgasms, and Woman B has sex once a week, one orgasm each time... Woman A is having almost 2.5 times the orgasms. If Woman B only orgasms half the time, and once when she does, A is having nearly 5 times the orgasms. Woman B is neither having more nor the same amount.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 02:38 PM
4	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? He's definitely had a lot of women fake it. He even admits as much when he says he doesn't know or even care to know if it's real or faked/performed. Says it all (he doesn't care about female pleasure, orgasms, stimulation... period). Not to mention the phallocentricism, it's all fellatio, piv, zero mention of any clitoral stimulation... It's like he's in his own real life porn fantasy, and she may as well be a robot. What he describes would maybe be sufficient for around 5% of women to orgasm; …	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 04:40 AM
-3	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? "An important difference between women and men is that it is much easier for women to have orgasms, though. Therefore simple cunnilingus or vulva-scrotal &/or perineal sex often results in orgasm. With men, such sex often by default often does not result in orgasm, so many women who expect that their actions will automatically result in the man having an orgasm too are often surprised when it does not. This is exacterbated by the fact that, because a lot of pornography is geared towards women an…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 04:35 AM
8	How often do you have to communicate what you want during sex? The fact hetero encounters generally, including yours, clearly revolve around piv, piv=sex=piv (and increasingly pia), any and all clitoral stimulation is just "foreplay" and thinking male dominance, even sadism, and female submission, even masochism, is simply how hetero attraction and sex works/is simply what they are actually unwittingly lets us know why you think female orgasm, is like, super hard, and male is easy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/01/26 04:31 AM
–	Women act like horny sluts with previous partners but if a guy wants his gf to act like a slut then he’s “porn brained”. Your post makes it abundantly clear you are the pornbrained man you claim is a feminist fiction eg your pornographic fantasies of 18-21 year old college girls, only phallocentricism in all the het sex references, the entitlement, misogynist slurs...	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/01/26 02:58 PM
2	Men wouldn't complain about "modern women" or feminism if both sexes were equally attracted to each other It's telling that a lot of the arousal concordance studies that use vaginal measures don't even mention the clitoris. But I'll link to some of the much rarer ones that measure clitoral. Vulval measures also tend to find higher arousal concordance eg https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2016.1265641 vs vaginal though clitoral comes significantly closer. https://psmag.com/social-justice/problem-sexual-arousal-studies-87383/ https://www.proquest.com/openview/e55419dcd958538a1ead9f88…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/25 03:17 AM
5	Men wouldn't complain about "modern women" or feminism if both sexes were equally attracted to each other Just saying this "women are virtually all bi, turned on by everything/everyone" is hogwash based in believing the vagina (rather than the clitoris) is the homologue to the penis and conducting research thusly. Turns out vaginal pulse has little to do with female arousal and that when clitoral erection is measured instead, women are as concordant in their arousal as men are. (Men's concordance is also overstated/overtouted eg is usually only around 70%. It also depends, for both sexes, on what is…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/25 01:42 AM
9	"Women are happier single compared to men" is a case of extremely dishonest framing Not to mention virginity is centred around piv. Which means there are lots of women who aren't "virgins" who have never orgasmed with a partner, never gotten oral sex, never engaged in most to all forms of tribadism (humping his thigh, bum, tummy, foot, pelvis, etc, (outside of piv)), even prolonged genital-genital rubbing... Some have never gotten purposeful partnered clitoral stimulation have any kind. At least not the above with a man. The homologue to the penis is the clitoris, not vagina so…	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/12/25 05:00 PM
2	Situationship is a term made up by women to make themselves feel better about being used for sex Me: critiques piv, phallocentricism, "penetration-centricism, how men are seen as life support systems for erect penises that enter orifices sexually by people like the op. Offers a clit/vulva-centric framing, defining of sex instead, talks about men's mouths, hands, thighs, butts, tummies, backs, balls, taints, calves... being involved in said sex in my above comment You: omg don't you know men go down on women and other unnamed things... Uh, yeah. That is what my comment you responded to was…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/10/25 04:11 PM
-1	Why are men blamed for supporting for conservative values when almost half the women do the same? if men voted as women did, republicans would never get elected as president (even with the undemocratic electoral college) and even only occasionally would in lower offices. iow, even when a large minority/close to or about half of women (or white women) vote republican, both men in general and comparing the sexes along race, age, etc lines re voting, significantly more men vote conservatively. (this also applies in other nations but the original post was about us politics)	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/10/25 10:23 AM
4	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? They quickly out themselves as abusive...	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/10/25 02:48 PM
–	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? Why the when toys exist qualifier? Why are women the ones being told "use a toy during sex so you can come too"? Why aren't men told to use toys on themselves during sex so they can come (eg with during sex understood as cunnilingus, her humping his balls, taint, butt, thighs, etc..)? Were men not selfish if they seldom to never helped their female partners get off before the advent of the vibrator "to help treat hysteria"?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/10/25 02:34 AM
–	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? Odd that you object to women rejecting the framing and practice of hetero relationships and sex as prostitution. Why do you want men to be johns and pimps, and women to be in prostitution (and sometimes the pimps of other women), both by default, and that simply to be how sex and relationships work? Why are women a consumable object, men the consumers, to you?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/10/25 01:29 AM
–	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? My condolences for the lack of imagination and inability to see sex as mutual, reciprocal, etc without piv or pia and with a clit/vulva-centric framing in response to the typical, omnipresent phallocentric one. It's also unwittingly revealing that even in this framing you have above, you still see men as active and women as passive.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/10/25 01:26 AM
–	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? It's worse and more is casual sex, but it's common in relationship sex too. Both are stacked against women. They both reflect the definition of sex as piv and what flows from that. The issue is the definition of sex not relationship vs casual. Relationship sex, while better odds for women re the sex, also has the costs of emotional, domestic, childcare, etc labor. Married women are literally worse off statistically on every measurement they can think of vs married men and unmarried women. Marria…	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/10/25 10:22 PM
–	Why do so many women say their low sex drive in marriage was due to lack of emotional attunement & burden of household chores, yet immediately start enjoying CASUAL SEX after divorce with men they share no emotional connection or household chores with? If we had a vulva/clit-centric definition of sex instead of one based on piv and other phallocentricism, we'd see that men refuse women sex constantly. eg few men will give cunnilingus in hook ups (while expecting piv, fellatio, even pia, other penile stimulation...). Only about half do even in relationships. Few women orgasm in hook ups due to phallocentricism, male solopsisim, female subservience, prostitution being our model of sex due to porn, etc, and many don't even in relationships (when …	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/10/25 04:45 PM
2	The “Innocent Privilege” Women Have Enjoyed for decades Is Fading As Technology Evolves Moblin sure is going out of his way to prove the reason that he compared you to a battered spouse is because he is obviously abusive...	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/10/25 01:30 AM
2	Situationship is a term made up by women to make themselves feel better about being used for sex Yep men like op (and some women to be fair) think all men offer and can offer women sexually is their penis, erect and preferably large, in our orifices, hands, on our breasts... But not clitorises/vulvas, oh no. If men truly wanted women to be coming on their dicks, if that's what the status quo was about, piv wouldn't be the definition of sex, poc (penis on clitoris) would be. As if men are just life support systems for erections that must go in orifices, get varied stimulation, orgasm, that t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/25 04:16 PM
5	Women: If you believe your ability to easily get casual sex with hot guys is NOT important/advantageous, why do you get offended when men use phrases like "Its easy to get pumped & dumped and be Chads cum dumpster"? Men using women to masturbate into (as the women in your screenshot are discussing) is not a compliment, privilege, boon, etc to women, no. If sex meant a variety of clit/vulva stimulation, and consisted of women rubbing their clits/vulva on men's scrotum, breasts, thighs, butts, backs, hands, mouths, faces, arms... until they (the women) had all the orgasms they could handle... If penis stimulation was very limited in means (eg seen as just possible with her hand, his hand, toy, maybe her mouth…	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/10/25 08:36 PM
1	Male sexuality is a net harm to women and women are better off decentering men or entering relationships with each other. That's because sex is defined as piv and what flows from that eg pia seen as the other type of sex, general phallocentricism, denial, erasure, shaming of the clitoris and vulva/clit-centric sex, rather than in clit/vulva-centric terms like cunnilingus, her humping his balls, taint, buttocks, thigh, pelvis... If the definition of sex were such things instead, it would be women having the easy time of having orgasms during sex and men the hard time. Piv is just the main reproductive act. There's n…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/25 01:58 PM
1	Male sexuality is a net harm to women and women are better off decentering men or entering relationships with each other. Older comment but: the idea any and all clitoral stimulation is just foreplay, nothing to do with sex itself as defined and practiced, that women have sex with their vagina and even anus, not their clitoris (the actual homologue to the penis), and piv and even pia are sex itself, is the problem, not the solution.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/25 01:50 PM
2	Men are more sexual than women. This is what I was going to say. What a shock that if sex is defined as piv and is otherwise phallocentric, men want more sex than women. No freaking duh. If sex was defined in vulva/clit-centric terms like cunnilingus (which most men in hook up sex, and many men in relationships won't even do) and her humping his balls, taint, and buttocks. If even most forms of foreplay were seen as clitoral/vulval stimulation (eg on his thigh, breast, back, arm, foot...) and not penile (seen as just possible …	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/25 11:37 AM
1	Men are more sexual than women. Progesterone influences spontaneous/cyclical desire too.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/25 11:28 AM
4	Men are more sexual than women. Because, according to you, they are motivated by getting sex. They both get to have sex with her, instead of just one or neither of them (she could even find two other guys who are down for her being with both of them instead). Winning all around. Lol, I love how you argue "men just want sex, and lots of it" and then when presented with two men having lots of sex with a woman, it becomes "why the fuck would they want to do that? This must be fiction by some mentally ill woman who ended up like t…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/25 11:25 AM
1	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. Next time, maybe read the original post my initial two posts and this whole thread were responding to. Also you love repeatedly asserting I'm telling these men to have sex with gay men when I'm saying why don't these lonely sex is a need, men have needs, we need to ensure men have access to sex, society must enable this men have sex with each other.	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/08/25 02:46 AM
2	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. Water is a need. If a man offered you water, would you not drink it and only accept it from a woman even if that meant going without for days? So either sex isn't a need, or... If it absolutely matters who men have sex with, if they decidely will turn down sex they don't desire with other sex deprived men whom they don't desire it (sex they want and enjoy, how they want it, with those they desire) matters for women too and there's no need to "fix" eg pressure, coerce, guilt, shame, pathologize a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/08/25 12:08 AM
1	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. It really is worrying how many men cannot fathom male bisexuality and the fact "straight" identified men can have sex with other "straight" identified men, and often do. Or at least claim they can't with the false dichotomy of 100% gay vs 100% straight your (you and other men bristling at this, acting all outraged) arguments rely on.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/08/25 11:31 PM
3	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. The fact male bisexuality completely eludes your brain says more about you than me	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/08/25 03:56 PM
–	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. Hey bro, get all touchy feely (and sexy) with your bros then.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/08/25 06:31 AM
–	Sex is a need, and men are losing today because they are not needed, which is a result of the Industrial Revolution. Then said men should have sex with each other. Problem solved. If you don't like this solution, why do you expect women to have high risk low reward for them (eg piv, otherwise phallocentric, pregnancy risks, disproportionate STI risks, orgasm gap, clitoral stimulation seen as optional foreplay at best, not sex, most forms of said stimulation erased...) sex with men they aren't attracted to but not men?	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/08/25 06:29 AM