TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sherpederpisherp Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by sherpederpisherp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Okay, so any time a feminist does something, it has to do with feminism? If Christina Hoff Summers takes a shit, is it a feminist shit? The ruling has nothing to do with "sex is not a basic need/right/entitlement for men (except for gay men)". It extends the right to marry, which opposite-sex couples enjoyed, to same-sex couples.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:04 PM
1

That has nothing to do with sex, or feminism?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:34 PM
1

"sex is not a basic human need/right/entitlement for men" (but for gay men it is) Hmm, I don't recall ever seeing them extend that to gay men. Do you have an example?
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:22 PM
-1

Fucking hell, guys. Can we just celebrate a huge human rights step forward, without having to try to co opt it?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:10 AM
7

I said "He was blacked out." You reply with "no he was blacked out." What?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:09 AM
11

Yes. The standard in Massachussets for whether intoxication vitiates consent is: if they are intoxicated to the point where they can't consent (yes, in this case) AND the accused knew or should have known they were intoxicated to that degree. Sometimes, blacked out people can act like they are barely drunk. However, it seems like she knew he was drunk enough that "the official story" was that he was puking and she took care of him. So yeah, rape.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:56 PM
2

Okay, there are several posts here describing him as passed out, unconscious, or comatose. He was blacked out. That means continuing to act while having no memory of it. It is important to support victims, both of sexual assault and false accusations. Misrepresenting what happened, unintentionally or otherwise, is harmful.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:46 PM
6

Yep. Feeling regret for sucking a guys dick while he was passed out and rape are NOT the same thing. I can imagine it's be pretty shitty to have to live with yourself for sucking a comatosed man's dick, While supporting victims of sexual assault is important, he was blacked out, not passed out.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:16 PM
2

Well what I mean is, the oldest and most common unit was the tribe. Children weren't raised by mother and father -- they were raised by lots and lots of parents. Heck, some of them didn't even recognize "father" per se -- they thought that you should contribute multiple fathers (this father's sperm made the kid strong, this one made them smart, this one made them hard working, etc.). The tribe's resources were almost entirely shared. You go out hunting as a pack and bring back food for everyone.…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:49 PM
2

The nuclear family as the basic social unit is a VERY VERY new institution. Extended family, clan, and tribe have been around (and still are) for much longer.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:52 PM
2

Well, good to see they dropped the Charter argument, that was a non-starter. Defamation is always a tough one, might be able to get an injunction against it but damages would be hard to show. The best avenue is the contract angle. While I'm sure they had a term in the contract saying "We reserve the right to remove you from the con for any reason," courts generally don't look too favourable on terms that let one side unilaterally frustrate the entire point of the contract.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:56 PM
1

You do realize that the "traditional family values" being pushed is a recent reinvention of the wheel?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:47 PM
3

Except they are 100% wrong. The ACLU has fought on behalf of transwomen to use woman only facilities before.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:28 PM
8

I don't think saying you were raped by a female as a male child really plays into the whole "we're just a bunch of good ol' boys" image they carefully crafted.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:29 PM
15

I'm upvoting because I think the movement needs constant self-examination, criticism, and skepticism, otherwise we go down the path that feminism took. But this guy is badly, bady misinformed on a lot of topics.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:47 PM
9

The SPLC generally does not put left-leaning groups on its hate list. They've never put a transexclusive radical feminist group on there, for example. Also, their ration of incoming donations to actual financial support of legal needs if fucking terrible. (Note that I'm a strong leftist myself. They are a junk organization).
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:42 PM
3

Well, that would be inaccurate. They allow transgender men.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:22 AM
10

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_throwing#Gender There's no centralized tracking of acid attacks. A literature review found men to bemore commonly victimized, while a charity organization for victims claims victims are mostly women. Note that the wikipedia article is feminism-tagged, so there's a good chance people watch it carefully to make sure it's kept slanted towards female victimization.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:14 AM
1

What resources are available depend heavily on where he is located. If you are uncomfortable with saying what city, then at laeast what state/province/country would help.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:46 AM
7

The comment in question: I MADE THAT VIDEO. I have to make it clear that I no longer endorse what I said in it. HANK (/BSJ/whatever) DID HARASS THOSE GIRLS. He scared them and he is scaring them now. He lied to me, he lied to Janet, the information above is nowhere near complete. The truth is that if he is not a dangerous person capable of inflicting physical harm on those girls (one of whom lives 12 minutes from him, with her young son)- he does a fucking great impression of it. They had no cho…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:39 PM
1

This looks purposefully written to make the narrator look bad. It's probably a troll.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:48 PM
8

Well, considering they linked to the good men project, it doesn't seem likely that they are MRA.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:44 PM
5

I follow the men's rights movement because I think the social enforcement of gender roles is incredibly unproductive and the cause of a lot of misery, as well as a huge waste of resources. I don't trust feminism to help dismantle these gender roles, as I've seen it directly promote some of the most basic ones (women as hypoagents, men as hyperagents). When it comes to how the different genders are treated, well... Women in the US, compared to men, live longer, happier, healthier lives. They have…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:42 PM
2

Yes, that's called a presumption. That's not what chafed is advocating.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 04:53 PM
0

Vive la diversite. Good day, fellow being. Oh hey, you're back. School doesn't enter into this discussion, it has no part in custody. Of course it does. School is one of, if not the biggest influences in a kid's life. Any discussion of where a child should live has to include where they are being schooled. And you're ignoring how men are being turned into absentee work mules by the current way of things, Where did I ignore that? My position is that the default should be equal parenting, and then…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:55 AM
0

As a seperate discussion thread. I think it's important to note about how it's the excepttional cases that determine how the law works. The majority of issues in family law do not get the official legal system involved. The vast majority of issues in family law do not get to the point where a trial starts.. The vast, vast majority of issues in family do not get to the point where there's a full trial and a decision. But, those rare few cases that go all the way to a trial end and get a decision …
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:27 AM
-1

If you don't want to respond, that's fine. I'm adding this for others. I gave a rare example to show how it can be in the extreme. If you want stuff that comes up over and over in family court, it's about where kids go to school and parents moving farther away. You did not address at all how your idea of "automatic 50%" isn't workable in the real world.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 01:18 AM
-1

Well that's one of the day to day problems of having two parents, whether they are separated or not. There's always the problem of the tie-breaker. It's not an unworkable problem in shared custody though. I've seen a lot of custody agreements that have provisions about what happens when the parents can't agree. A very common one is for medical decisions, where an outside medical professional who both sides agree to casts the tie-breaking vote. The problem is, both sides have to agree to the same…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:31 AM
0

Because "being equal" isn't the point of determining child custody. The guiding principle is "best interests of the child". And yes, in ideal circumstances, having both parents equaly involved in the child's life would be best. But there's often times when the facts of a particular case doesn't make equal custody/access the best fit. The obvious example is instances of abuse or neglect. But there's plenty of other situations where equal tiem with the children just doesn't work. For example, when…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:44 PM
-2

Automatic 50% custody is a terrible idea. A presumption of shared custody that can be rebutted is fine.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 09:11 PM
52

Umm, do you seriously think non-white men have an easier time when accused of rape?
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:48 PM
1

Yes. We should promote acccuracy and being factual. Circlejerking may feel good, but it doesn't get things done.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 10:52 AM
2

From the story, it sounds like she uncritically accepted one viewpoint, and now she's uncritically accepting a different viewpoint. Progress?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:33 AM
13

Can I have a cookie?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 02:40 AM
1

The rough guideline is support lasting from half to the full length of the duration of the marriage. The guidelines are here, they are a 150 pages or so mind you.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:31 PM
1

No, no it isn't. I'm not sure where you're getting your information. Spousal support is very context specific in Ontario. In a 15 year marriage with two children where one spouse is the primary breadwinner, spousal support would be from around 7-15 years in a normal case. If the lower-earning spouse has custody of the kids, for the amount, you would look at their net disposable income, and jigger the payments so that the lower-earning spouse has about 40% of the net disposable income. That would…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:22 PM
1

What? Yes, spousal support is pretty normal in Ontario, where one spouse wasn't working over a 15 year marriage.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:40 PM
-1

Needs a write-in. I cast my vote for 'swole'.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:52 PM
2

Don't let facts get in the way of the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:23 PM
2

Yeah, it's a really blatant violation of medical-legal standards that gets a pass due to cultural reasons.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:51 AM
3

Just a clarification. When it comes to medically necessary procedures when a child's life is in danger, parents do NOT get to make the decision. Courts have repeatedly ruled that Jeohvah's Witness parents do not have the authority to deny their children blood transfusions.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:33 AM
1

Bad Luck Brian having his IamA removed is so perfect.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:19 AM
3

I think you mean Poe.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:14 PM
6

I don't downvote them, but I generally don't ever watch videos posted here. It's usually information that could be conveyed in about 1 minute of reading stretched out over 10-20 minutes of video. I do tend to downvote meme posts, and posts with zero-content titles like "This is important!" or "I can't believe what happened".
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:44 PM
5

The lower courts misapplied the law. The Supreme Court, well, I disagree with their decision to stay proceedings.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:45 PM
15

The Crown's position was that even if what she said was true (that he was abusive), it wouldn't meet the requirements for duress or self-defense. So they didn't bother to rigorously challenge her claims. Turns out they were right when it came to the law, but she still got a stay of proceedings.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:41 PM
19

Umm, he wasn't found guilty of any abuse. He wasn't even charged. The reason why it's in the court record is as follows: The Crown charges Nicole Ryan with counselling to commit murder her husband, Mike Ryan. She goes with an affirmative defense, saying that while she met all the elements of the crime, she is not guilty because of duress (I believe she also claimed self-defense, been a while since I read the case). The duress stems from her claim that Mike Ryan is abusive. The Crown's position i…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:38 PM
2

Honestly, between feminism from the left and traditionalism from the right, I'll go with feminism.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:23 PM
1

Yes, thank you.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:53 AM
1

Seen a few people tossing around mens rea. To be clear, mens rea is NOT your mind thinking "I'm gonna rape." It's you intending to commit the act, whether you consider it a crime or not. The "I'm going to commit a crime now" mindset is a higher level of culpability, called specific intent. It is a required for a few crimes, such as first degree murder and theft. Under regular mens rea, accidentally taking someone else's coat that looks just like yours would be a theft. You certainly intended to …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:47 AM
1

Fuck this traditionalist bullshit. Men who can't / don't want to DIY aren't less of a man.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:10 PM
5

His arguments seem about as loose as his mother. Pathetic little mangina Oh fuck off. Juvenile rhetoric like this is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:59 PM
1

They're trolling. It's pretty obvious.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:27 PM
9

It's blatant victim-blaming as well. I was the only man present when I was raped. I should have stopped it, according to them.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:24 AM
1

I can't seem to find it offhand, but I recall a study showing that when times are tight, companies lay off single men first.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:49 PM
1

Yeah, that's a better way to put it.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:42 PM
2

So because he doesn't like trannies or gays he's somehow bad? Yes. Seriously, do you not understand this? Not liking people based on their sexuality, or gender, or race, is bad. It makes you a bad person.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:04 AM
3

the majority of western society Not even close.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:56 AM
1

There's a difference between not being serious and being funny. Just yelling out "go kill yourself!" is about the same level as "I know you are but what am I?".
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:37 AM
3

You misunderstood, Mykeru was making a joke. It's an easy enough mistake to make, as usually jokes have, you know, humour in them.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:29 PM
3

Yeah, if the story is true then either he has terrible lawyers or he didn't follow their advice. Springing a last-second prenup and the other party not having independent counsel seems to be begging to have it tossed out.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:25 PM
3

No, it isn't. You can't remove the entire clitoris without doing some serious invasive surgery. The majority of the clitoris is internal. What you're thinking of is the clirotal prepuce. In some forms of FGM it is removed, in others (more common) it is not. Note that it contains less than half of the sensotory nerve endings that the foreskin does. The foreskin is not "just some skin". You have no idea if your health or life has sufferred from it as you don't know what your life was like before i…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:58 AM
9

Circumcised men have higher rates of premature ejaculation. More sensation does not equal faster orgasms.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:55 AM
2

For anyone intact reading this, it is generally not a good idea to use soap on the areas protected by the foreskin. It is an inner mucosal membrane and cleansers can cause trouble (for similar reasons, douches and enemas can be a problem). Rinsing the area while lightly scrubbing with your hand is enough. If you must, use a small amount of mild soap.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:54 AM
11

It depends entirely on jurisdiction ahd whether you are speaking of crimes or torts. It could be considered assault, battery, both, or some other term depending on where he lives and whether civil/criminal.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:46 AM
2

How much someone likes something is only one of many inputs to how much they value it. Other influences are how much it costs them, what their other options are, and so on. So, for example, if men and women enjoy sex the same, but the repercussions of sex for women are higher, they will value it differently.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:11 AM
5

The foreskin is naturally fused to the glans early in life. This can last well into the teens, completely normal.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter