TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shinarit Archive

View 3 posts and 974 comments by shinarit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

breitbart
/r/PussyPass04/06/20 05:48 AM
0

Hence the archive link.
/r/PussyPass03/06/20 04:01 PM
-1

I could compare it to how homosexuals were excluded from donating blood for a long time, because their sexual activities tend to be riskier than heterosexual people's. These things are not pure homophobia, they are generalization based precaution.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 12:20 PM
-3

To be fair, pedophilia and homosexuality are somewhat correlating.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:18 AM
1

Patriarchy theory was always a load of horseshit.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:12 AM
14

I found the reasoning meh as well, but I take what I get.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 11:07 AM
43

Why did you think for a second that Emma Watson was an intelligent, rational woman after her speech at the UN?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:10 PM
3

I hate male feminists too, so what?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:03 AM
1

We talk about special forces, not simple mooks. There only the peak humans get.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:09 PM
2

So fucking what.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:40 PM
1

Even if they are equally qualified theoretically? That will never happen. That's what he says. A woman would have to be a serious mutant before that might happen. Until we get to real genetic engineering, peak man > peak woman, hands down.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:39 PM
8

That's actually painfully true. I literally had this conversation with a girlfriend (we were young, she was only 15). So I'm expected to pay for dates and shit? And what are you adding to the relationship? My presence and love. It wasn't a long relationship, not solely because of this, but it certainly helped ending it early.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:02 AM
1

If you want pussy then yes, obviously the owner of the pussy is in a good position. But thankfully that's not life.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 11:00 AM
1

You seriously want me to dig up studies about testosterone? If you give it to women, they become manly. Also, just an indirect indication, it works this way in the whole planet.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:20 PM
2

You can't expect a perfect explanation in a short, one sentence comment. Obviously there are differences between male and female thinking, studies prove it. On the question if it's learned or not, we have a lot of data on that too. Also, men are better "suited" to become criminals, that's a fact. Taking more risks, being more violent (to strangers).
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:02 PM
0

And what do you think science is based on? If you guessed observations, you get a virtual cookie. But to provide the answer to your actual question: there are studies that show that men have better results in all kinds of tests, like the spatial awareness and logical thinking and shit.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:59 PM
1

While you are right in that I didn't exactly expressed why women are incapable, there are very good reasons why women tend not to go STEM. Generally men's brains are just better suited to that kind of thinking.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:04 PM
3

Women are not capable of it. Maybe you could gather enough women from all the world that would be capable. Maybe. But that doesn't really mean women are capable. Some women are good, they work and earn the respect of their peers. But women in general tend not to go tech.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 11:33 AM
1

Not exactly. This pay is 23% lower than the man's would be, but his would be ~29.8% higher. That's how percentages work.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:16 AM
2

I imagine they feared the Milo will chase the black guys screaming for their dicks or something. Seriously, what does safety mean anymore?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 12:02 PM
1

I think this comment added a lot of value to it. But yeah, this is self explanatory.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 12:01 PM
2

This is so ironic it's like I chew lemon and something sweet at the same time, I don't know what facial expression should I make at this.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 12:00 PM
-3

So you say there can't be more reasons for something, adding up for the final decision?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:36 PM
2

Well, I went to see Iron Man partially to see Gwyneth. I love her (looks, not her personality) and women in suits. But I'm the minority and that's not her movie, so what is she talking about?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:49 AM
4

What the fuck did I read?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:48 AM
1

While that's true, not every assault is equal.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:59 PM
5

For FUCKS sake that wage gap... when will it die?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:17 AM
3

Did anyone see the actual thing? It was not assault. I don't think any of them are right, the guy can't bring up a good argument why the double standard is justified and Ana is just overdoing the whole "wow assault hurr hurr" thing.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:12 AM
2

I just hope she does a Suey Park, turning around 180°. She said retarded things before, but she tried to remain rational (and failed). Soon she will realize that you can't win with these people using rationality.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:29 PM
4

This is true for everything, since you know, men are the ones who generally do stuff. The good old "women complain, men solve the problem" routine.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:29 PM
2

Then he wouldn't concern troll. The main point of trolling is that it's not sincere. Start using words correctly.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:26 PM
1

You should. But you still did invest a lot of time in the relationship, no matter if it worked or not.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:18 AM
3

Assuming this story is true, saying that you actually SAVE money with a gf... that tells the whole story about the girl's knowledge about relationships. Having a girlfriend is an investment, and a big one at that. Even if you don't spend money, your time is invested.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:34 AM
1

It doesn't. You just used the world pedophile incorrectly, and I don't like when people are called pedos who are not.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:02 PM
2

I agree, I got called a white knight not once for not assuming someone woman's guilt at first sight. I don't agree with the downvotes but calling it a very good point is a bit too much I think and I understand why people downvote it.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:48 PM
3

You never listened to offensive comedians then I assume? Lot worse stories are told, with fucked minors, dead bodies and so on. Nobody takes them seriously, because they are comedians. And this accusing /u/DavidByron2 with white knighting because he doesn't grabs torches to burn the witch on an allegation... well, i accuse you of being hysterical and bandwagoning and a generally retarded person.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:43 PM
1

It's not about what YOU find funny. Don't assume guilty until proven so. If we believed every comedian's words, all would be in jail.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:42 PM
3

Probably because Polanski never confessed, it was never clear that he actually did what he accuses him with. But AFAIK Schumer made the "confession" in an act, so I wouldn't hold that against her either.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:40 PM
1

It's about being prepubescent. That's the key. When all kids have the same basic bodyshape, no estrogen or testosterone forming shoulders and hips and boobs and shit.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:40 PM
1

That's because you think in lines and not in effects. Parallal effects strengthen or weaken each other. Perpendicular effects don't.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:51 AM
2

Orthogonal, as in they don't affect each other. But parallel works too, depending on your angle (haha). In math, orthogonal vectors are said to be independent, because they don't affect each other.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:59 AM
1

I don't say you are wrong, I just don't see the point. Race is important, but it's perpendicular to gender. Neither feminism nor the MRM should consider it. Intersectionality is just bullshit to make whining easier by washing stuff together.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:43 PM
1

I'd like to think that it's overreaction like the fears feminism instilled in women.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:15 AM
3

Yes, obviously. It's like when instincts and preprogrammed reflexes were not enough, we introduced feelings. Much more abstract, much more flexible, and much more prone to misfire. Men have a drive, and this drive allows them to mate with women. But we are so far from tribal times... it doesn't work that way exactly anymore.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:56 PM
5

You don't go far enough. All leads back to impressing women, because that leads to the survival of your genes. Indirectly. Indirect methods sometimes lose aim. How do I explain gay men's ambition: how do you explain gay men? Gayness is an error in the population. They are obviously won't pass on their genes, at least less so than non-gays. But the human population can take it.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:31 PM
5

And why do men have that drive? You don't think abstract enough. I said directly or indirectly.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:15 PM
6

It's terribly offensive to reduce men to that, and is most definitely offensive to (and disproved by the achievements of) gay men. You might be offended (note the difference between offensive and you getting offended), but it's the biological truth. Directly or indirectly, men make achievements to impress women.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:08 AM
3

I don't like DD cups.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:02 AM
1

Except after war or other loss of population. Also women live longer and die more rarely from stuff like diseases, so not at birth, but it evens out or turns around, depending.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:56 AM
1

Also, the last time I checked- women have died in many wars too. Quantities, man, quantities. Death or public execution is a standard for women based on alleged allegations that don't even have to be proven - in some countries, all the man has to do is say that his wife committed a crime and they believe his word, even if she hasn't done anything. Now just imagine how bad the men have it if women are treated like this! It sure sucks to live in a non-western, fundamentalist society. Women are sub…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:55 AM
3

You don't know much about humanity and history, I see. Believe me when I say this: men always have it worse. No exceptions. This is biology.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:50 AM
2

Why did I know it will be one of Karen's explanations? She grabbed this whole thing so well.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:48 AM
3

I mean, I would actually put them all in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans. K, would be fun for a while. I would give them a choice of vehicles to drive around with, give them no porn, they wouldn’t be able to fight – we would have wardens, of course! No porn? Well, good luck with your wardens. All men, in camps, with no porn, it's a straight way to rebellions and a lot of dead and raped women.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:14 AM
2

I don't live in the US, so I can't know, but what is the basis of your racism claims? Note that class and money usually has much more to do with anything than race.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:30 PM
3

Image is just as important for men, it's just that women has more emphasis on appearance. But it's crucial for men too.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:27 PM
2

That's a bad example, there are only two genders (gtfo tumblr), but there are a lot of races.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:24 PM
1

I think it's now getting to the point where there isn't as much of a need for women to assert their rights Was there ever?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:24 PM
1

how is that not the only thing you guys talk about? Probably because most of us are not sentenced.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:29 AM
0

No, it should be SCIENCE that decides in academia. Of course if any man wants to open and attend such spaces, it's their right, and that is anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:31 PM
3

This can never be told enough. There is the misconception that feminism turned bad somehow. No, it was never good, so it never turned.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:12 AM
1

What are you talking about? If the argument is that 1 in 4 women are suffering RAPE in their lifetime and they are dead afraid to go out at night, and you say that's bullshit and here is the CDC or whatever statistic to disprove it, saying that the majority of victims are men, you belittle women's problems. And there's nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:05 AM
5

We have to belittle women's problems, because they are blown way out of proportion. You have to belittle them just to make them look more realistic.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:51 AM
2

and looked exactly the same That would mean that either you didn't disable it or they don't have ads, which kinda defeats the purpose of asking users to disable adblock.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:49 AM
2

The title is sensationalist as hell. The actual content is yeah, ok, we seen it a thousand times already. Also, this whole thing implies that feminism was ever a good movement.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:48 AM
1

Political activism. Journalism. Get into spaces occupied by feminists!
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:38 AM
1

Yeah, it's better how? You feel you did something, so you won't do anything useful. It's a valve that lets out stress, not letting it build up until it could cause actual change.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:09 PM
0

Because a petition will change everything!!
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:12 PM
1

So you want to hide such content from sight? :)
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:54 AM
2

Inclusive but not intersectional. Just how I like it. Intersectionality just mushes things together, making it harder to talk about shit.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:42 PM
1

Patriarchy hurts men too!!
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:30 PM
6

Well. To be honest, no feminist is a normal person. No, not even them, whoever you thought first. Patriarchy theory is a huge pile of bullshit, the idea that women were ever more oppressed than men too.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:30 PM
26

I wouldn't complain about those anyway, block/ignore the person and get on with your work/life. What is concerning is that this implies that if a white person says the same things they will get punished. I really should get off github.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:27 PM
2

Encourage personal connections. It's awesome to have a hivemind white knight echo chamber community of like-minded people to correspond with. This really proves it's a circlejerk. Who even knew about that sub that you had to bring this up?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:22 AM
0

This post is at least four times longer than it should be, you repeat everything so much.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:20 AM
1

I love watching Milo, but who gives these retarded titles to vids?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:58 AM
0

The fact that it's about THIRD wave feminism being wrong, implying that the first and second waves were not malicious movement should tell you everything about her stance.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:56 AM
1

Yeah. I see the intent behind the post, but it's misguided. It won't actually help those who are there right now.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:48 AM
4

This regulation is retarded. Australia is very excessive sometimes. But this comment is just hilarious.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:29 AM
7

Nah, young people are genuine, just immature. Trolls are deliberately behave like they do. But I meant feminist PR campaign.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:54 PM
5

No, I think this kind of post does not give any value to the sub, on the other hand it shows the MRM as bitter, petty assholes, which can be cause by any of the three mentioned reasons.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:53 PM
10

Shitpost, trollpost or OP is just too young?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:46 PM
1

This is ironic as hell.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 09:54 AM
3

Well, there are people having less obligations but retaining the rights, even in the US, mostly from colonization. But the general laws apply to them as well.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:11 PM
54

I have no fucking idea what a free inhabitant is, but this "THIS IS RAPEEEE!" was funny. And "I'm relaxed" she says with a voice so strained I thought her vocal cords will rip. I'm not sure it belongs here, but it was fun to watch for sure.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:04 PM
1

I don't feel that looking at my comment history, which is public, would be any different. So what's the problem? Let them.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:30 AM
1

The biggest myth about rape is that the police thinks women lie. This means that the biggest myth is that the police thinks X. Being a myth that would mean that the police actually doesn't think X. X being women lying, if the police does not think they lie, it would be a positive thing for feminists.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:13 AM
9

Why should I put arguments? What against? You said something in need of arguing? I didn't notice it. You spew bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:09 AM
2

The quoted sentence means that police actually doesn't think that women lie. You would think they would be happy for that.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:04 AM
10

Ok, so you admit to being retarded. Great.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 11:02 AM
1

Who cares? As long as it's not an official thing, I don't give a fuck. They can tag whoever they want, I even support it.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:57 AM
5

Wait, what does asking for it means? What do you want to say with your post? You yourself write that they deserve reprimand. So what do you imply? They should be let off easy?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:14 AM
13

Fuck you. When we have stories about men beating up women in self defense I always defend the men, because they are simple people with no martial training, they are not required to know what the appopriate response and force would be. But when we talk about MMA fighters, they ARE perfectly capable of gauging the opposition and what is required to fend off an attack. Yes, if the story is true, he was a jerk. Being a jerk means you are allowed to be beaten? No, it does not. If a man does it, it's …
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:12 AM
2

Less exclamation marks in your titles help you being taken seriously. Edit: in general, not you OP. I see that the video has this title.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:34 AM
-4

THATS THE FUCKING THING I WROTE YOU MORON. Just read this fucking post you answered to indirectly. O M F G. And I get downvoted to shit while you guys are retarded. How did we succumb this far?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:49 AM
-10

Depends on your definition of making X on Y.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:08 PM
4

They do, just not for the same work.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:58 PM
0

I could ask the same with this title. Why give such a shitty title? It says nothing about the linked content. Please learn to give better titles if you plan to submit to anywhere, but even more so if you plan to submit to more serious subs.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:56 AM
1

It doesn't matter how you call it. Sexist, prejudiced, whatever: it's being an asshole. It's called arguing over shit, or if done in an argument as a defense it's simple derailing.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 08:54 PM
1

And what did the first 99% of human history had? A tiny fragment of the current population with basically no technology. Anything great requires structure, structures come in tree structure, with important people at the inner nodes.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:28 AM
0

Anarchy doesn't work. What's not at fault there?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:32 PM
9

As an Anarchist Muhaha. Even though I agree with your first paragraph, this is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:10 PM
0

Never, we are hardwired to act this way. Well, maybe with genetic engineering.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 08:26 AM
2

Just like this subforum likes to grab the most absurd quotes off of anyone who self-identifies as "feminist", and paint the whole movement with the same brush, feminists do the very same to "Men's Rights Activists". You realize that the MRM doesn't have a boogeyman "theory", right?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:31 AM
2

it goes against social norms for women to care about men's issues. That's why they are so powerful as spokespeople and we need them. But threads like these? I'm not so sure.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:29 AM
1

Canadian man potentially faces 6 months in prison for refusing a feminist to dox and harass. What does this mean? "refusing a feminist to dox and harass." I have no fucking clue what the title wants to mean.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 07:07 AM
14

manages to blame Men's Rights for her removal as well I would call it a victory if the MRM were responsible for it, but no, she was so painfully bad basically reddit as a whole ejected her.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:06 AM
1

I'm more bothered by the "where does minions come from". Who the hell cares? It's not science fiction. They are blobs. They are probably genderless, and plopped by the jelly plopping machine.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:11 AM
3

No, he said that when you want to create dumb and stupid characters, they have to be male, because that's what the audience will consume.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:09 AM
-6

I don't find it hypocritical in itself. Men and women are different. It could be that women need women-only spaces and men don't. It's not the case, but she might have some theory or argument for her case.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:23 AM
2

More like a spiral. A spiral descending to hell.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:16 AM
7

It would be much more credible if these were actual posts shown, not just comments written under the pictures by one person.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:41 PM
0

I don't mean screenshots in general are bad. Just this way. There are extensions to create shots from a whole page, from selected regions, whatever. If you are on mobile, don't create these posts, because it will look like this.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 08:23 AM
-2

Ah ffs, this screenshotting is terrible.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:12 AM
1

Well, if you identify as insect, I won't tell you otherwise. But I think you will have better luck on tumblr, search for the #otherkin tag.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:12 PM
1

What can I say, when I see the truth, I tend to write it down.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:44 PM
0

I read them, and still find it hard to believe that you are real. I thought only feminists have this kind of batshit crazy, defensive, smarter-than-you retards. You are like a neckbeard fedora-dualwielding radfem on ritalin.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:33 PM
1

Wow, and you really believe you are somehow intellectually superior in this "debate". Wow, just wow. People like you exist. This is a happy day.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:25 PM
-1

Wow, now we play spot-the-misogynist? You wouldn't believe people like you exist, but they do. Thankfully most of the MRM is actually sane people.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:52 PM
2

But that is a stupid joke by the professor. If you can't step at least half the distance, you will never get even close to the woman. If you can step MORE than half, you will get there in finite steps. So it's NOT Zeno's paradox. Even if we knew they can step exactly half of the distance as first step, it wouldn't be Zeno's.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:56 PM
-16

As for your take on what happened, you can defend that animal all you want. I've seen dozens like her. She needed to be checked. This sounds dangerously like some TRP bullshit. Please escort yourself from this sub and never come back. Though considering the votes, the sub is agreeing with you, so screw you all. She is not an animal, she is a voilent person. Yes, your original post is perfect, because it tells about the MEDIA reaction, which is biased. But /u/bobbage is right: that second punch w…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:46 PM
12

Police were called to the restaurant and following an investigation found that the manager was acting in self defence, according to NY Daily News. He later declined to press charges against the woman. Why? Okay, probably she wouldn't get anything, but it's still worth trying, isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:38 PM
1

I read an article about it a while back which contradicted this: that they can only attract people with cheaper tickets. And how unfair that women still get paid the same.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:09 AM
-1

Now we only need the same for tennis. Which is already a casualty.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:07 PM
-5

Basically you acted like a douchebag and she got violent. Nothing to see here. Both of you: grow up.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:29 PM
1

Linking to your watchlater list?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:39 AM
8

I think I can, I'm over the first rage. It's simple: equal pay is not an issue. It does not exist.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:40 PM
11

I’m not spitting in the face or being lazy about what still needs to be done — but I don’t think it’s just women anymore. Yes, because it were just women back then. Men always were the kings of life. The Sex and the City star believes equal pay and paid sick leave are America’s most pressing political issues. My fucking equal pay when they learn FUCK. I just can't. Anymore.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:31 AM
3

In your wording racism is perfectly fine as well: acknowledging that the races have differences cannot be wrong, right? Yeah, but that's not what racist or sexist means.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:40 AM
5

What. If you hire 10 workers with the same skillset, you will divide the work to 10 parts (or so, considering shifts or whatever). Just because men and women complement each other it doesn't mean that for example two men couldn't be an effective unit. And the total is almost always less than the sum of the parts, what you get is speed.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:50 PM
19

My guess would be that her intend was to show how ridiculous the complaining about false rape accusation is, and only succeeded in actually showing that you have to go to extreme measures to really be safe.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:17 PM
17

It's ironic that she intended this to be satiric, and completely failed at it.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:52 PM
-1

But you see why it might be reasonable to treat men and women differently in sports, right?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 02:03 PM
1

You try to say that men and women handle heat the same way? Do you have any studies for that?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 01:56 PM
0

You are not, this is a shit thread. Even without knowing that they are separate leagues with separate rulesets, men and women are different physically, that's why they play in different tourneys. So it's perfectly logical that they might have different rules for the sexes.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:47 AM
1

Why are you downvoted? I came here to say the same thing. Until we know the ratio this stat is meaningless. It's like we are really turn into feminism, see some statistic which MIGHT suggest discrimination, get to full speed and go without actually validating.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:54 AM
1

I still can't decide if Denise has accent as Swedish or a speech impediment. Adorable anyway.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:38 AM
6

The fact is: feminism is not a good movement. The so called sane ones are the ignorants.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:26 AM
1

Then don't write the source on it. It IS important who said it, because there is a context for everything. But thankfully it doesn't matter, because it's retarded, no matter who is the source. This is like quoting Einstein on political shit. He was a physicist.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 08:11 AM
1

Well, less prudish countries have the age of consent at 14 or 16, so 17 is just fine. But this just proves my point. Not that I don't agree with you, you do something that's against the rules -> you bear the consequences. But I still think it's a pretty huge overreaction.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:45 PM
3

I understand what you say. I don't feel sorry for them, because I don't know them. But just to imagine to go to jail for having consensual sex... this sounds very stupid. I don't think that 4 year old will have nightmares, you have to explain to them what happened. It's not like they involved the kid.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:49 AM
3

The US is prude.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:02 AM
2

You can argue, just stay calm and classy, don't get into the murking water. Be fast to agree to disagree, even if she doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:59 AM
7

There is no indication that she won't be charged in the future. Though this should be in Eastern culture category.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:56 AM
2

First: everyone knows women casualties are more effective as news. Second: women are usually not combatants and considered defenseless, so when we talk about war, "women and children" is basically the name for the unprotected civilians. Third: nobody gives a fuck about men. But these days I mostly hear X people, Y children among them. So that's good.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:38 AM
5

This is retarded. Not the discrimination, I see none here (at least not provable), the title is clickbait and OP can go fuck himself. The retarded part is going to jail for fucking on a beach. Fine them, give them public service, but JAIL? It's not like they caused any harm or cost to anyone.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:36 AM
14

Yeah, men are animals, just how women are animals. We are the same species, it would be weird not to be or not be animals together.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 09:30 AM
-1

Wow, epic burn bro! I think I rest my case, you prove my point more than anything I could say.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:35 AM
-6

I would stop whining about people poking fun at men when they don't do at women. Poking fun is OK. What we need to reach is that women can be targets as well. Or not, men and women are not equal, this is how biology works.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:29 PM
-2

No, it's about him not being taken seriously. This whole thread is not about how he was humiliated, it's about how people don't take it seriously (as you said it correctly).
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:27 PM
-10

Are you simple minded? Who talks about the poor guy? Why are you arguing like a feminist? It's not about the guy, it's about how people react to the guy, the comments.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:31 PM
-19

Why are you guys whiny bitches? WHY? Yes, double standard, but the solution is not being as oversensitive as feminists, it's getting to a healthy middle ground.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:17 PM
2

I remember a couple strongly worded threads here, pro and con too. But anyone can post here, so...
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:40 PM
2

I definitely agree with you, no argument there. As everyone else, his words and actions should be judged in their own context. Sometimes you lax that for people with a history (good or bad), but here it's not the case.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:40 PM
1

Well, the Mad Max thing WAS stupid in my opinion, and for sure, it divided the MRM, so he is not against the majority. But yeah, he is not an MRA, and that's fine. Here he destroyed that woman with logic. That last sentence was as simple as it gets, no way to dance around that.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:59 AM
-1

Seriously, this is retarded. OP is retarded. There is NOTHING implying there it's about you being a male and dangerous and woohoo. It IS weird for adults to be friends with teens. Teens are stupid, immature.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:40 AM
2

“I think there’s no boys so it can teach girls no matter what gender you are, you can still be what you want to be,” said Josie, a 6th grader. Yeah, except if you are a boy. Then you are fucked.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:22 AM
6

This is not humor, it's retarded.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:56 PM
0

I know I will be downvoted, as usual, but can we not call consensual sex rape? If the partner wants it, it might be sex with a minor, sex with whatever, but rape should be when one participant is there when they don't want to be (and they communicate it). Of course real children, like under 12 can't do it, but we talk about teenagers.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:00 PM
7

So now we support feminist bullshittery just because it's men who would benefit from it? Pay is the result of how desired the work they do and what is the supply of workforce. It's just like the porn industry, women get payed more, and it's fine.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:36 PM
0

This is more retarded than anything I saw today, and I browse /r/TumblrInAction. Seriously. There is no such contract. Nobody has written it down. Just as any new contract will not be written down. These are gradual changes. You can't have all men break camp and leave society. This is our society too. We are responsible for how it looks right now. It's like some 12 year olds write pieces about anarchy. Adults just shake their heads or smile jovially.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:18 PM
2

There are numbers between the current and 2 billion. Think hard and not in extremes. The fact that a lot of of European countries rely on immigrants to keep up their numbers show that they need more people.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:43 AM
1

That's true. But I'm really afraid of robots. I'm in the best place as a programmer not to be replaced, or be replaced last, but when the masses lose their jobs, things will be hectic.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:42 AM
1

Constant population is ok-ish. Yeah, you can't grow forever, but western countries are not nearly there yet.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 10:38 AM
1

instead of simply fighting for equal rights for both genders? Then they would have to give up privileges, because right now women has every right that men has and more.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:27 AM
8

Society wants more children. Aging societies are bad. It's your own interest to have a lot of young people in your country. Also, don't be jealous of them, no matter how much money (time = money) they get, they will still be in the negative compared to you, children are not cheap.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:19 AM
49

#HeForShe She talked a lot about issues, and in the end concluded, that while men has issues too, we should all talk about women. The most dangerous kind of feminist, because makes no sense whatsoever, but not obviously retarded, so people will cheer her.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:49 PM
68

After Emma Watson I don't expect much from UN Women. They don't disappoint.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:13 PM
2

Even if the whole thing is filmed, and he only uses force enough to constrain that creature? I know the legal system is stacked against us, but that much?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:02 PM
9

I have to cringe about the retardedly, titled posts that are so high for this sub. If you can't give a good title then go with the reddig suggestion. Or ask your neighbor. Writing "wow... just wow" is simply sensationalist, and we don't want that. We are not feminists, ffs.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:38 AM
16

Thank you OP. This is the kind of post we really need. Even MRAs and close people usually think women were so oppressed and first wave feminism was some great movement, and only modern days are different. But why would modern days be different? People rarely change, we are still the same humans we were a thousand years ago, a bit higher but not much else.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:36 AM
2

What if he continued filming but go and stop the bitch?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:31 AM
15

Basic rights without basic responsibilities, don't forget that. Feminism was never about equality.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:44 PM
5

She really deserves a tramp stamp.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:43 PM
1

There are more salons which offer haircuts to women than to men. There are more clothing shops exclusively for women. It's demand based. Most men don't want to be in a male only dorm, so they don't offer it, it's not economical to maintain a half-empty dorm. Try to think without instantly getting offended, we are not feminists afterall.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:38 PM
1

This comment should be higher up, along with some others. It's not sexism, and please try to not be crybabies, whining for non-issues. This is not an equality thing, women and men are NOT equal, most men will always want more women around them, and women want the same thing. It's not symmetrical.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:27 AM
2

What's it called when a woman supports MRM? Sane, informed woman?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:23 AM
3

The funny part is, her answer is totally reasonable. I screenshotted it, because I don't want further edits to totally alter it. I don't know what the original was, but this version is fine by me.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:15 AM
7

They couldn't leave without bringing up fucking rape culture.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:43 PM
7

Do they have proof? Or it's a witchhunt, but against a woman this time?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:56 AM
1

Where are all the outraged feminists?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:40 AM
4

Nnnnno, you simply ignore them, and I can't decide if you are a 12 year old trying to be tough or a feminist trying to make the sub look bad.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:50 PM
2

How about we ditch all the "Tell Men Not to Rape" and "Tell Women Not to Make False Rape Claims" posters, and start getting serious about it. It's time to teach our sons and daughters how to have mature relationships without all the angry, politicized baggage that swirls around these issues. This is great.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:57 PM
2

Shitty title, link reposted at least the 3rd time. Go away.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:23 AM
0

And blacks are better athletes than white. That was racism as well, if you believe the propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:10 PM
8

Because feminists base their whole movement on something that doesn't exist, and they defend it with aggressive shaming and censoring.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:50 PM
1

I would rather have toxic feminism than the disingenuous, stealthy one that calls itself an equality movement and people believe it. At least with this kind it's obvious.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:58 PM
1

No, I don't think we should be retards just because other people are.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:27 AM
1

That really depends on the country you are talking about. I wouldn't call 2-3 years a small period.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:26 AM
1

I would consider this a win, not a defeat.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:05 AM
3

LGBTTIQQ2SA Hehe. It's like they parody themselves.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:05 AM
4

It worked! Reverse psychology at it's best.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:02 AM
4

150k in a couple hundred million, basically unsearchable because no other data associated with it. Yeah, I don't think that's harassment.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:12 PM
8

You have to realize that you cannot harass someone by speaking about them. To harass someone you have to be in contact with them. No doxxx means no harassment.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:56 PM
1

I thought you will say that: one is literally a hate sub and the other is just a jolly place to laugh with fat people. That would have been funny. This, thinking you are serious... it's rather sad.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:55 PM
25

You would think this is a joke. But it's not. Being that bigoted is something. Not even trying to accept your worldview, calling you a terrorist, it's just dangerous. Don't let it get to you.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:53 PM
5

Considering SRS is still active... I wouldn't take that "policy" seriously.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:49 PM
3

2000 sounds enough to be representative (if other criteria is met).
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:41 PM
1

Insulting someone usually doesn't seem to help much. So you can stop it. The one with a reading comprehension is you, as you argue with strarmen, not with my point. Also, hitting puberty without testosterone producing organs will not do wonders to your malehood.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:26 AM
6

Now this is one of the vids I was looking for. Very good points about why even 3rd world countries are NOT feminists issues.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:24 AM
1

It was a nitpick, but what can you say to these "arguments"? You can only ridicule it, because it makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:52 AM
1

Biology, chromosomes, hormons and anatomy are not the feel of gender identity. We don't talk about the identity as in if you can identify him as male, but if HE HIMSELF identified as male.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:43 AM
1

I agree with you, but stripping away rights from women might be harder than giving them to men, even if morally it would be the better choice.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:07 AM
3

It's probably because the statistics showed 3 bumps, one in each range. So it makes sense from that PoV, but it tells very few about the yellow countries. But 20+ is bad. But it looks bullshit a little: I really-really doubt that Slovenia has 80+ rate. They are neighbors and decent people, not really unlike us.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:04 AM
1

And how is that contradicts my post? I didn't say he caused it himself, I said it's complicated, and explicitly said it was caused by the psychologists experimenting.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:01 AM
7

That... that doesn't make it less of an issue. Just think about how many of men's issues are caused by men.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:32 PM
14

Considering that passing as a woman is much harder work, I don't see it happening from someone who is not transgender. And good luck finding one who lived years as an adult male, then became passable female and then wants to talk about the experiences.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:26 PM
5

We know since long that equal treatment is considered sexist, by everyone involved. So this wasn't really a question.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:22 PM
15

I like you, love your efforts. Props for the dog too. Those animals get seriously protective if they feel their pack threatened. The most friendly and waggly dog gets all ruffed up and bitey when a stranger starts to act funny.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:19 PM
5

In actuality, she just wanted me to listen, agree and sympathize rather than try to solve the issue at hand, something I feel is part of who I am. This is classic gender asymmetry. Men don't ask women because women don't provide solutions, and women get frustrated with men because men provide solutions. It's a general topic.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:15 PM
1

That was the point. If it's legal for Moms, why not for Dads?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:09 PM
2

I just wanted to point out that if we go for equality, leaving the Mom part and only allowing Dads what /u/9outof10experts said would not cut it.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:08 PM
-74

I think David's gender identity was not "male" but "complicated". There's only so much a personality can take from tinkering psychologists.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:21 PM
14

I... don't think anything in the middle east is a feminist issue. It's a human's rights issue. Believe me, you don't want to be a man where it's bad to be a woman.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:44 PM
89

It reminds me of that case when the twins got circumcised and for one of them they rolled a 1 (critical miss) and they decided to make him a girl instead. He/she/??? committed suicide in the end, gender identity issues all his/her/whatever life. Found it: David Reimer.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:26 PM
1

Yeah, at first I downvoted too, because it looks provocative. But then you think for a second, and he just asked a question, a pretty relevant one. So up he goes.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:17 PM
3

And you are OK with someone playing Mom until they get bored?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:16 PM
2

Also the title is typically shit.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:53 PM
9

This was a much better post: why nobody tells men to smile. Not precise, but the important parts are in: nobody gives a fuck about a man.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:11 PM
5

I'm happy for you, and while it's not really important, because it's the past, but women were never the oppressed class. Beating your wife? Nah.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:24 AM
2

So they have no arguments. I knew it, but it's nice to see with your own eyes.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:17 AM
2

I don't think we should call it cache, it's archived. Cache is for speed purposes.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:47 PM
5

No, I have an opinion, and want to know if it holds any merit, and if so, what sources can I cite to convince others. See: Or if I'm wrong, could you tell me why?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:29 PM
4

There's got to be a better justification than that. Usually it's the "it should look like my husband's".
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:07 AM
3

Well, I must say watching some wretched person having sex is somehow arousing. I don't know what it is exactly, maybe it's the feeling that she tries to say something with it because ARTZ, and I just don't give a fuck. I have no shame for what my penis finds attractive.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:58 AM
1

That's why I used the distinction of LEGALLY and MORALLY. Rape has a definition, and is present as a legal term, and the two are very different. Or more precisely, the word consent is the differing part. You can consent to sex without the legal system acknowledging your right for it. Consent is saying: yes, I want it, please do it. Legally it's only consent if you are over a certain age (and there can be other conditions too). But many legal systems don't call it rape. They call it sex with mino…
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:33 AM
1

In the US, legally, but that doesn't mean it's rape in a moral sense.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:01 AM
1

By myself, mostly.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:00 AM
1

Legally, in the US it's rape. I don't know about the UK. But morally it's really not rape. The boy is 14, capable of making decisions. Not legally allowed to consent, but that doesn't mean it's rape. Just as a 14 year old girl can be fucked without it being rape, even though in some more prude countries you would commit a crime.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:59 AM
1

And write a manifesto about the MRM? /r/feminism would love that.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:57 AM
2

I think I agree with you on disagreeing with the other responses. I think what they describe is not the kind of down that you and /u/MagicalPowerfulEvil calls depression. That's why I tend to not use the word, it's meaning is not clear anymore, even though it has a psychiatric definition, people use it to too many things.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 07:57 AM
11

There are problems that simply don't have a solution. And sometimes they hurt. Sometimes they don't. These are one of the worse days, so I guess that's prompted my post.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:01 PM
1

The question was, what is modern about 16? Newer maybe, but modern has a positive connotation.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:00 PM
6

I don't know how does it feel like being dead, but I can get seriously hopeless sometimes.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:00 PM
199

Mrs Balsamo said her husband was usually "laid-back" and had never shown any suicidal tendencies. This fucking scares me. What if this happens to me as well? Not child support, but all those not expressed shit has to surface sometimes. I feel I live dangerously suppressed.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:53 PM
-2

Raping? Not if he or she agreed.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:23 AM
0

everywhere in europe had modernised to 16 at least. Modernised? MODERNISED? Da fuq.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:22 AM
2

This is a very important point to bring up. If you think we are equal now, you are very much mistaken. But I feel she thinks we are.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:39 AM
3

And you are right. But brighten up, from the 13 comments this thread has, you are the 2nd with this same opinion! So not all is lost. Also, we are not banned for disagreeing, so there's that too.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:39 AM
1

Also, it says "these days", which shows that they really don't understand why feminism is a bullshit movement, it just went so overboard it started to register as bullshit to even them. That's not a good thing.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:37 AM
3

Linking to any semi-active imageboard is like throwing a rock on a river expecting to still have it there when you look back.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:36 AM
-1

these days Now you can start to educate them about past day feminism and why it was bad.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:35 AM
3

I don't think Hillary is a Hollywood personality. But I could punch Emma Watson for being the most disruptive retard in the last year (heforshe my ass). And the whole brigade for equal pay, it was a dozen old women, I don't remember who. Mostly it's women in music though, who spew bullshit, like Beyonce and Taylor Swift.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 10:51 AM
22

Like having sex? Because if you call it rape, you basically took aways the legal right. The fact that the man is punished in this case is just standard procedure.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 10:48 AM
15

Also: equality.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 10:47 AM
6

Anti-feminism is not anti-women. This is pure concern-trolling.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:01 PM
1

Feels nice to live in one of the really dark areas.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:54 PM
1

No, the scary part is how popular that opinion is. Some extremists are always there, but this makes it seem like the majority opinion. Though it might just be a voting brigade.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:48 PM
2

I thought similarly: I don't care much for men's day, and I definitely didn't give a fuck about women's day. But it's about attitude. I won't sign it or whatever, but I see the point of it.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:34 PM
12

>unimaginative name (activist114) >sensationalist bullshit This is fucking bad guys. This is the seal on the coffin. Something must be done to fights this. I know this is not an activist space, but we need to push hard against this measure. This is trying too hard.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:29 PM
-1

If you don't know what to call it, just copy the title or ask Reddit for a title suggestion. Thread titles like this are fucking useless.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:41 AM
1

No, I did not. Consent is a legal thing again, that's why there is a thing called age of consent. Under that, you can't possibly give consent to the thing it's used on.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:10 AM
2

She did, but this is TV, not a real sport.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 09:56 AM
5

May I suggest not using titles like this?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 09:51 AM
1

No, it shouldn't. Some legal systems call it rape, some not. In a non-legal sense it's child molestation, sex with minors, whatever. Not rape if not against will (note I didn't write consensual).
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:51 PM
1

We can assume that any of the pictures are about abused males, because women use more emotional bullshit than men.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:05 AM
3

I don't think that an artist's intentions are more important than what is actually communicated in the end product. If they can't express themselves clearly, it's not the viewers fault. But in this case it's just pure feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:48 AM
10

I imagined your example, the pig's confused look when it is told that it is discrimination. The pig thought it is just a pig.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 09:31 AM
4

It's fucked up, because the title and the whole article is implies that only women are suffering, only that half sentence reminds us what happens with men.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:32 PM
4

Considering what we did in CC (killing each other in Quake), it really doesn't matter, everybody is pink on the inside.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:42 AM
3

I'm always vary of Molyneux, because he likes to play around rationality, but he has a lot of valid points. It's always fascinating how many intelligent people are around the world, thinking so differently about things.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:39 AM
4

EDIT3: This has sparked a really nice and balanced discussion, so thank you CMV. It's a controversial topic because while Men should have the same rights as Women, the rights of the child seem to take over that of the father, but not the mother. I think /u/Billy90 put forward the best argument against this. I read for a while, and I don't see the balanced discussion. It's full of bullshit arguments and strawmen.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:32 AM
74

I think Asians would have some objections to that.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:26 AM
1

Yeah, but try to sell that to your average "obviously i'm a feminist, i want to vote" Sunday feminist (girl or boy).
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:35 PM
-2

#NAFALT Seriously though, everyone knows there are retards. What you have to prove is that feminism as a whole is not better than this. And that's a tough cookie.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:43 PM
-3

This sounds like an excellent fantasy.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:59 PM
1

Yeah, I guess you guys are right, and I'm too much into this shit to notice how the average people feels.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:01 PM
-1

SJWs pull that when you show support. This is not support, this doesn't tell you that MOST men are OK. It just tells that they know one or two who are not abhorrent monsters. I don't see how these two are equal. But I understand your point, something positive is better than anything negative.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:59 PM
-3

Why does the content has to be the same amount? What's wrong with having less content? Just because there are no worthy things to post it doesn't mean you should post nibblets.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:11 PM
-7

Aaaaand it continues. Whatever, have fun with your graphs and muh oppressünz attitude ^^
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:59 PM
-10

I'm sorry you're offended, it's only a graph. Oh ffs get away from me with your passive aggressive condescending bullshit. NOW you made me mad a little.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:47 PM
-5

I know, but see this thread, similar title, with some actual content. This on the other hand?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:15 PM
18

I mean, deserving salute for being not retarded?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:14 PM
-10

Yes, it's awful etc, but FFS really? Are into feminism now? Manspreading and all that bullshit? Why spam crap like this? Yes, everyone knows that men are not valued. Move on, do something about it.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 01:09 PM
1

No, I talked about how it's different here compared to the article, so it's not Canada. The fact that I don't see any problem with a 29 - 16 relationship in any direction may come from that.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:13 AM
1

I don't see any problem with it, if they were never teacher-student, and even then, I saw some examples and yeah, people gossip, but you won't get ostracized. Of course age of consent is 14 here, so it might mean we are more relaxed around sex.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:39 AM
2

Edit: I mean radical feminism. I completely support the original feminist movement, what I mean is the feminazis in our culture. See, this is the problem. If support the old feminism you don't look into things, just parrot what you hear. That's a direct way to become someone who can't defend their arguments, just shouting them, like feminists!
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:36 AM
2

You what? He didn't edit, and his post seems fine. If this level bothers you, you are mental.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 05:14 PM
2

You talked about the post quality. I think the highest rated posts are the most relevant to post quality. Anyone can post anything, the community decides how worthy that opinion is.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:51 AM
12

I saw a lot of pretty funny posts. But the highest rated posts are either supportive of men or just trying to critique the study, which is fine in my book. I wish feminists were this skeptic with their studies.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:55 AM
18

How the fuck is Lena Dunham a feminist icon? HOW? Someone please, I just don't understand. You would think feminism would show her under a rug after being proven a liar and a child molester.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 07:52 AM
2

Just tell him that most people are not cut, especially outside the US. It's not a normal thing to do.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:02 PM
8

I just hope the child has some tools to prevent this monstrosity. I don't know, throwing a tantrum, hit the doctor, becoming sick, whatever.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:05 PM
12

If I were a feminist, I would call this rape.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:03 PM
2

The statement was about how tame or wild the rape scene was. If they show her anus ripping apart, that's hardcore. If they just show some tears that's tame. The scene in Irreversible was semi-hardcore, it was pretty showy. This GoT scene was not, it was more implied than explicit. That's what he said, not that Theon suffered more in that bedroom.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:05 PM
2

And it's such a tame rape scene, too. The worst of it seems to be happening to poor Theon, just having to watch it. When it comes to Sansa, there is a brief shot of her face and that's pretty much it. Just read it. Do it. Especially the last sentence should be clarifying for you.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:45 PM
3

That's... that's not what /u/ThePigmanAgain said. They said that SCENE was bad on Theon. The things we actually see. Most of the action was off camera. Non-tame rape was one episode before the current one, when Myranda was fucked, that was a rape, and not a tame one. I don't know why people are not outraged about that if Sansa hurt their feels.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:14 PM
4

Thankfully it's only for male feminists. If any sane person (male or female) sees this list, they will know what to expect and never be feminists.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:45 AM
2

Please link with np as this bot says here.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:53 AM
1

No, the SJW land is when people post shit like "THIS WOMAN TOLD ME XY AND I WAS SO OFFENDED!!44!". Your post is more subtle, more like feminism, trying to emotional abuse to coerce others.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:10 PM
1

You know, trying to shame others into accepting sub-irrelevant posts because they are heartwarming and they wouldn't want to seen as heartless. Textbook manipulating.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:31 PM
2

I see the positive story, but just because it's heartwarming, I won't say it belongs here. This, what you and OP are doing is manipulative to say the least.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:37 PM
3

Just browsing through it you could even think it's a well written piece. But at the end they expose themselves. This is golden: What could make a big difference would be if workplaces reconsidered how they compensate their employees — and were more transparent about it. Rather than disproportionately rewarding workers for putting in long hours and making themselves available around the clock, they should reward high-quality work and allow employees more of the flexibility they need to balance wo…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:36 PM
4

The only question is: does masturbation counts?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:14 PM
3

I don't care about religious dressing, but how is this /r/mensrights? No, seriously. Someone explain please.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:13 PM
1

That's actually pretty realistic. Women protected and all.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:11 PM
2

This should be much higher up. The OP is really not informative. OP doesn't even say where did he post his link. If I don't want to have politics on my sub, I would discourage posting shit-stirring articles as well. If it was in a debate about this thing, than I understand why he is upset.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:11 PM
3

But they DO generalize women. As incapable baby victims, needing special attention.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:20 AM
8

Not only that. Being scared and being in danger are two very different things. What makes women scared is exactly feminism, not the "patriarchy", whatever it is.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:34 AM
0

I couldn't read after the first part sentence, it's just too mannered. So I can't say about your line, but your methods are...
/r/MensRights16/05/15 07:08 AM
1

I still have no idea what are women's issues these days.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:06 AM
2

Which was still shit.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:02 AM
4

Yes, once, feminism was about the idea of re-evaluating gender roles, and offering equality to all. That's why they never strived for equal responsibilities? I don't need that kind of "equality", thank you. Feminism is rotten from the beginning.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:01 AM
2

When someone in power speaks out against not just modern feminism, that will be the happy day. We have to kill this myth that feminism was good and got bad, it was never good.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:00 AM
2

Obviously that would be an ideal world. What we don't agree on is hat feminism is any kind of answer to the problem. I say when you go for rights without the responsibilities (which is feminism, even in non-western countries)., you are not striving for this ideal. (Not you as in you, but general feminists) The women's rights movement is the perfect example of this. More rights, no more responsibilities.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:54 AM
0

I don't think she is a moron, I think she just tried to ask all the questions people might have when they hear his arguments. I feel she made very good questions, and wasn't judgmental at all, good interviewing skills all in all. Though he could have been more clear on the custody thing. Just say that "this is a starting point, but each couple of parents are different, most will come to an agreement where the woman spends more time with the children, but some will make a different one, with the …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:15 PM
2

I don't really understand dress codes, we don't have those in my country, at least not in schools, so I can't be sure, but if the dress codes are there to make everyone look acceptable then men in skirts would violate that purpose.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:37 PM
2

Now you did it right ^^
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:10 PM
3

Why should I care about someone's uneducated opinion? Why should the sub care about it?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:39 AM
2

The dress code of a school should reflect the dress code of the work place . A public school is not a vacation resort or a night club.....it is a place of learning . Teachers , support staff , and students should all be dressing for a learning environment as many work places have dress codes that must be followed......students need to learn this before they enter the work force..... I already had a downvote-heated argument about this, but I have no problem seeing that dress in a workplace. Not f…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:33 AM
1

I... don't think banning men in skirts is a sexist rule right now. Skirts are not a normal wear for men, therefore they cause distractions and unnecessary disruptions. Maybe in a decade?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:30 AM
2

There is no rape culture, case closed. But even assuming the ridiculous idea that dress codes for girls are there to protect boys, the entitlement... if a boy is distracted by her upper back and shoulders, then he should be sent home and 'practice self-control.' Why is your rights to be bare shouldered is more important than a boy's right to no self control? What makes you more important than a boy? What if some boys are biologically unable to control themselves? I know this sounds retarded, and…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:28 AM
11

Why the fuck are these "remove this" or "I'm soooo offended by that" posts are here all of a sudden? Are we meninism now?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:19 AM
2

No one should ever use "/s" unironically.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:11 AM
2

This post doesn't have enough upvotes.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:10 AM
3

The solution is not censoring others but to remove censoring. Just because feminists are retarded, evil and oppressive, you don't have to be. Let free speech flow free.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:09 AM
9

Not that this post really belongs to this sub, but following their logic, what are women's rights? Don't women already have all the rights (and more)?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:07 AM
3

They should state it in places which are less friendly. Here it's simply a call for attention, even if that's not the intent. Do this in /r/feminism or tumblr or whatever.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:29 PM
2

Care to elaborate? /u/Josh-P gave a reason here, but I'm not sure it's a good one. But I agree, it does matter, but it should not. And if we just lay down and shrug our shoulders, "it's bad but what can we do?" then nothing will change. I refuse to wait for women's approval in anything, and it's a "I'm one of the good ones!!!" cry from women. I love when women talk about our stuff, but they should do it in other circles, in neutral or hostile ones. There it matters. Here it's just attention crav…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:28 PM
10

(I'm female). This really shouldn't matter, therefore shouldn't be stated.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:20 PM
-2

I called her an attention whore contingent on stuff. And attention whore is a phrase with a very well defined meaning, not some slur. If you are that, you are called attention whore, no other phrase defines it that clearly. It's possibly a cultural thing, western people have much lower tolerance in their communication.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:59 PM
1

It's not really inherent though. Like a lot of middle east countries, women got the right for education and work, and they still don't bear the responsibility of providing. Or China, very similar.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:42 PM
1

I think principles are important. I don't see any raging or attacking in my post, I just explained why I find her post distasteful.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:40 PM
8

By going for equal rights but not equal responsibilities (like the always brought up draft or simply the social expectations to protect women) you don't aim for equality, you are actually a female supremacist. Economically and politically women obviously have the same or more rights, it's guaranteed in the law. Socially it's debatable, it's not about rights, but something much harder to quantify.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:26 AM
7

but they don't really understand what feminism means "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men." I don't want to burst your bubble, but having equal rights but not equal responsibilities is not a worthy goal. That is why I always say that not the extremists are the dangerous ones, but the "normal" feminists, who really think they do something good.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:06 AM
1

No, this is not. I have no idea why anyone upvotes you. Actually I have some ideas, but it's just sad. You didn't do anything worth apologizing for (or didn't admit it in the post), and considering yourself a sinner for your sex is something feminists do and we try to avoid. The other possibility is that you don't consider yourself faulty, then it's pure attention whoring in the "see guys I'm a good one" sense. We see the same fucking thing when white dudes apologize for being white, or men apol…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:04 AM
2

All I can hear is: But what about the womyn?? This is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:59 AM
1

It doesn't really matter. Lets call them bananas instead of sexists, it doesn't make it better.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 07:32 PM
1

Says who? The question was if the guy has a study on the topic or no. Just because you say it on the internet, I won't believe you.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:54 PM
2

Millions every day Wut. That would be at least 700 million newborns a year, 1.4 billion if we count the girls for the ~50-50 too. Most newborns are not circumcised, so it would be much higher. I think this girl doesn't know her numbers.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:42 PM
1

I have no idea what the frenulum is (will look up right after posting this), but I still can argue about foreskin, because there are obvious points about it. I doubt the frenulum can be anything game changer with bodily autonomy and sensitivity on the table.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:40 PM
0

I get that your link has nothing to do with the wage gap. It's slightly related, but the link only provides "return on degree" stats.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 03:33 PM
3

Legal rights are just one thing. And feminism is not the answer to that either. Feminism concentrates on one gender when the whole society is somehow skewed.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:49 PM
1

But... the so called wage gap is not about 'where' but 'what sex'.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:23 PM
1

/shrug
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:16 PM
0

You don't fuck with a guy with a Ranger scroll. I don't, because 1) I'm not gay (and no women yet, as the article says) 2) I'm a programmer, not a fucking soldier. But that doesn't mean other specialist units will not beat rangers in friendly or other competitions.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:13 PM
3

You don't understand reserve spots I think. Women have a shot, the same way as any man.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:10 PM
2

Reinventing the warm water, but glad it's happening.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:06 PM
11

I don't see what's the obviously laughable about his theory about poverty. Did he prove that blacks in Africa have lower IQ poverty is caused by lower IQ? If so, it's the overreaction of the PC police. I'm not an expert, so I can't say if any of the assertions are wrong or right. What I know is that genetics are only a part of the picture, so being black doesn't really that important, it's more like poor people are prone to give birth to lower IQ children, for environmental reasons and the mothe…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:59 PM
3

modern I don't see the need for the distinction.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:56 PM
-1

I understand you, just wanted to be pedantic.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:07 PM
-1

I want a girl who can keep up with me at least Then you are pretty lazy, compared to the girl. If you were exercising as hard as her, she couldn't keep up with you.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:50 PM
1

Some context on what am I looking at? I'm really not familiar with this thing you photo'd.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:48 PM
7

How is this a mens rights related topic? Unless it's explicitly said that men and women are distributed evenly, I don't see the relevance.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:46 PM
3

Yeah, the dating up phenomena is on point. Most women, no matter how they want to change or deny it, want a men who is stronger than they are. Strength can be measured in a lot of ways, but it comes back to: the man has to dominate the woman in some way. This is simply biology. And as women has the same opportunities as men (or more, with retarded sexist rules), it's getting harder to get ahead financially.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:16 AM
9

Learn: objectifying is NOT bad. It's normal. What we should reach is that everyone knows this. Not bad when it's done to women either.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:31 PM
5

This is so retarded it belongs to /r/TumblrInAction
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:21 PM
0

It's like arguing that we don't need English because we have Esperanto. Nobody used reverse question mark, not because they don't have it, most keyboards don't have ™ either, and people still use soon™. It's just a retarded fad and most people just conform. Sarcasm is NOT a grammar construct, it's semantics. A certain intelligence needed for it. Imagine if someone behaved like an Elcor and prefaced everything with "With sarcasm: your points are very good and make total sense".
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:39 PM
-2

That came to life like a year ago. People talk on the internet since much longer. But as more average or less than average people join the communication, they need crutches to navigate, I understand.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:27 PM
0

I'm not sure about that. Many of the problems are not directly concerned with relationships with women. And that is the only difference between gay and hetero men. At least in my interpretation, most of the problems deal with the societal domination of women's narratives.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:00 AM
-3

(vocal tone/pitch, body language etc) doesn't translate to text. I would assume that people realized this a while ago and they communicate with different words and phrases in writing and in live speech. Like, centuries ago. Or you speak as you would write a book?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:58 AM
3

It sounds like some Christian propaganda. I would claim that telling what a real man is terribly sexist and patriarchical, but considering we talk about a deeply patriarchal system...
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:31 AM
1

I think Karen is one of the best people to represent anything reasonable in broadcasted stuff with an image (TV, streams, youtube, whatever). She is persuasive, convincing. She takes shit with a straight face.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:12 AM
-1

Well, you might be wed at one point of your life, either to a man or a woman, and then you will be affected. But most of these go back to male disposability, so every man is affected.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:00 AM
1

I don't think any Christian literature says "cut your sons". At least here in the EU only Jews used to cut their sons. And no, just because some men don't agree with this, it's an important issue for others. So it won't be toned down.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:59 AM
3

That's the point: they shouldn't be compared in the sense that which is worse. Both are worse enough that they should be banned. Anti-intactivists are the ones who tend to compare, saying it's nowhere near FGM.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:57 AM
-8

/s is for retards. Humans recognize sarcasm. Don't use it.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:52 AM
1

That really depends on the evidence we talk about.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:35 PM
1

Not to mention the countries where men are worse off. You mean all countries? More rights doesn't mean you are better off, believe me.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:07 PM
1

In my opinion the best way to fix this is to contact the authors of the cited articles and tell them that he wasn't an MRA and provide evidence. If you can provide evidence that overrides the publications.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:06 PM
1

Yeah, the sexism is not in the assertions but in the double standard: if you state similar things of men, then you are labeled sexist.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:17 AM
7

The title misses the "in the US" part.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:12 AM
2

I outwardly dislike what it has become No, it was always shit. Never believe anything else. Revisionists are the worst.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:10 AM
14

It wasn’t the distance. It wasn’t that my husband was gone for so long. It was that he took my identity from me. Yes, it was the distance, it was that you married after knowing each other for a short time, and then you were separated, obviously the flames will die down. It's perfectly normal. Don't try to justify it in a weird way. You should have file for a divorce first, you are morally in the wrong. But these things happen. Long distance rarely works.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:00 PM
3

I wouldn't call myself an MRA, I'm just bothered when I see injustice. And feminism as a whole is pure injustice, propaganda thrust down your throat. (yes, first wave feminism too) The MRM looks like a nice place to talk about these things.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:44 PM
10

No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion. Who upvotes these angsty posts? I almost cut my self on the edges here.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:11 AM
-1

You realize that there is a huge difference between post your feelings and jumping at any perceived slight, right? If you read the comments here, it's full of assumptions and cry over hurt feels. People LOOK for something to be offended by. We don't want to become the new feminists, right? Because that's what they do.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:30 PM
-5

You being downvoted is the fucking proof of how right you are. These comments are so bad, I don't even know where to start.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:35 PM
2

These posts are actually retarded. Like this, or this, people don't even try to be level headed and intellectual. Guys, becoming feminism 2.0 is not the goal here.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 02:34 PM
1

I don't know. Bioware is as SJW as it gets, but the bromance with Garrus is just perfect. I don't agree that it's nonexistent, you just have to play with good games, not shitty mass produced ones.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:14 AM
0

No, I would not. As I said, when you are scared to death, you are not reasonable. The brain is a funny thing, it blocks out shit sometimes. If you ever read Iain Banks's Surface Detail, there is a great scene in there, when a husband and wife finally get the chance to escape from (virtual) Hell. The wife is so traumatized for their time spent in Hell, she is not really coherent anymore, doesn't even believe the real world exists. So when they get to the gate, and the husband cannot be sure they …
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:51 PM
2

There are more basic problems with it. Since there are only two genders, and discrimination will favor one and disfavor the other. So discrimination is negative, no matter what.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:43 PM
1

I wouldn't blame the woman. She was probably scared shitless. You don't think straight then.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:26 PM
1

Ok, but doing STEM and earning equal wage is not the same thing. The wage gap is real (just not discriminatory). Also, women are different biologically. We know that. So I don't think social relations would become equal.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:57 AM
37

Great post. Some of the responses are playing the "but women have it worse" tune, but whatever, that post is golden, literally, multiply.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:21 AM
1

Yeah, because most women REALLY earn less than most men (not their colleagues, but friends, family), so they find this wage gap to be true. Which is bollocks, but that's what you have.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:13 AM
1

I respect your opinion, and you might be right. But so far I don't see why. Well I strongly disagree. I think if there's a way to get a whole of women genuinely interested in STEM fields (as opposed to bribing them into it), then it would help alleviate a lot of problems for men, gender relations and society in general. What would it help in your opinion? Why would it be beneficial? People like to parrot equality is good, but why 50-50 in everything is desired?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:04 AM
9

You can womansplain that away. But UN is serious business.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:05 PM
3

I don't care about her solution, because I don't see the problem. She feels despair watching the low number, I shrug my shoulders and be happy these women had a choice not to come to engineering (or do so, depending on which women we talk about).
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:04 PM
38

We must go beyond creating equal opportunities to ensure equal outcomes, So now we have definitive proof that meritocracy is the enemy of women and feminism.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:35 PM
0

That is perfectly true. I just see here that the posters sometimes pretend that fucking a teenager is the same as fucking a preteen, and that young boys really don't want to have sex with their teacher (which is quite true for a lot, and not so for others). Teacher-student relationships should be punished, but consensual sex is not rape, no matter what. And it was clearly consensual in this case.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:56 PM
-1

I absolutely agree that these are horrific stuffs, but please, PLEASE don't become genderist retards! Guys, men are women, boys and girls are NOT the same, there ARE differences. If you pretend there are none, you are just as stupid as feminazis.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:08 AM
3

What I try to express is that painting a problem as a women's problem, like some middle east countries where they can't go to school or China where female fetuses are regularly aborted is just false. These are never women's issues, because where women live shitty lives, men live even shittier ones. Male disposability is not a joke, it's a reality, and the more primal we go, the more it becomes dominant. The issues are complex, and trying to solve the symptoms that affect women in the name of fem…
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:05 PM
1

If they succeeded with their war campaign it would probably had spread nazism even further. I'm not sure I agree with that. Europe as a whole didn't really need a dictator, it would have crumbled, subsided pretty fast.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 10:03 AM
2

the harsh reality that -real feminism- is needed in counties that arent as developed as ours. We don't really agree on that, and I think there is no consensus that feminism was ever really needed, anywhere. It's a myth that's holding strong.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:58 AM
0

Brave or foolish? Is it worth sabotaging your academic future?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:56 AM
4

I remember being misunderstood and therefore downvoted to hell, so I try to find what the fuck are you talking about, but I just can't. But the model's perceived parsimonious ways were not the only thing to draw the ire or online critics. Twitter user Zaira Cross said "Sam isn't half as fit as he thinks he is, with the personality of a porridge oat." "Model Sam had a beautiful face, even with manbun, beard & tattoos but Zzzzzz personality," Junie Woonie posted. Seems like shaming to me.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 03:33 PM
5

They call him SAM which is a giveaway that they talk about him.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:35 PM
13

The double standard here is when women get meaningless death threats, they are not shamed for it.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:05 PM
5

So why is that "Equality = " is before the title? Why is this here?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:35 PM
2

Yeah, he is fun and all, but really not the guy who should be promoted here. Respect for him not trying to attach himself to the movement!
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:29 PM
2

See, and that is what these people want to eliminate from schools. They mostly killed it already, but they want it gone totally. This is a huge motivator for many children.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:11 AM
0

I think you miss something very important. If you portrait women as suffering things, you imply that men don't suffer. You imply that the problem is gendered, and not a complex social issue, that hurts everyone. Like China's one child rule, and how many female fetuses are aborted, it's definitely NOT a women's issue, and it's still portrayed as one. Or things like Boko Haram will happen, and people will only know about the female victims, because that's what fits the narrative. There are no diff…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:07 PM
6

This title... you are a fucking idiot. Don't judge someone before you know the truth. Even when you judge someone, don't presume bullshit. You have no idea who is this woman, what did they do and why did they do what they did.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:29 PM
5

I don't learn in order to beat my classmates; I educated myself to make myself better. That's you. Most boys want to beat the others. You learn to be better than others.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:22 PM
1

Lets see. It's fucking OLD, everybody saw it already Even in 1915, women were not targeted by violence and there was no war against women, physical or other. Feminism was never needed.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:20 PM
2

Better not. Low quality shit, good for nothing but rustling some jimmies.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:18 PM
1

And the irony when feminists constantly talk about how women don't have a voice. They do this a lot in big television shows and internet channels with big following. The fucking irony. I hate the world.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:17 PM
-5

But WRA is still bullshit. If women have it bad somewhere, men almost definitely have it worse. You can't change a system by focusing on women's visible struggles and ignore men's more subtle ones.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:14 PM
1

Exactly. I seriously get sad when I see posts like these, upvoted and all. This is almost like behaving like a retarded feminazi, but worse, because you expect a cookie for it.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:12 AM
3

I got to 21. It's... I don't know what to say. It's depressing. This intelligent woman thinks she is right, thinks his son's most important task is to "level a playing field" that is already skewed towards women. Fuck this.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 10:13 AM
2

Happy mining then! Probably no institutional sexism there.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:59 AM
5

You got downvoted because people go to WTF to gape and laugh.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 11:14 AM
0

Yes, but they are really not in the top of the competition. The real top is this two girls I mentioned.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 04:07 PM
0

Polgár and her two older sisters, Grandmaster Susan and International Master Sofia, were part of an educational experiment carried out by their father László Polgár, in an attempt to prove that children could make exceptional achievements if trained in a specialist subject from a very early age. As I said, it's empirical evidence. The sample for women is still too small.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:05 PM
6

Yes, we do. Your link is interesting, but I wouldn't be so sure with the conclusion part.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:35 PM
2

That can happen for a thousand different reasons. We DO have empirical evidence that when raised as a professional chess players, they are not worse than men. But they are rarely raised that way, and they rarely have the will to be raised as such.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:30 AM
-1

I just mentioned that considering how few girls choose to be professional chess players, they have some pretty neat results. If you have 10 million male players and a thousand female (overall), it will be a miracle if one of the girls get to be in the top10.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:28 AM
3

They don't think it's relevant. They can't think logically, but they are really good at emotional manipulation. If they can't beat you with logic, they will shame you. Fuck, they will shame you no matter what.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:26 AM
2

The latest/first two women worth mentioning in chess were Chinese and Hungarian/Jewish. Not Slav at all.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:26 AM
9

There are no MALE tourneys. There are the normal and the female ones. Any woman can play with the guys, and the better ones do so. Considering the amount of female players, they have pretty good results.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:24 AM
-3

I really think this is the case when encouraging is the only missing thing.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:21 AM
5

First of all, I don't think Judit was ever women’s world champion, she didn't really play in women's leagues. But... this is such bullshit. Women are not better or worse by genetics, or at least we don't have the data to support any claim. What we DO know is that the Polgár sisters were raised to be chess players and they became pretty successful. This makes me think that being a good chess player depends on the upbringing more than the genetics, and the difference between men and women is that …
/r/MensRights20/04/15 08:19 AM
-1

This so much. If you can make her not a feminist (by citing facts instead to replace the doctrine she got fed), you are good to go. It's worth a try. If not, it's not a bright future.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 07:52 AM
2

No, most of them are females being treated in some way and THEY assume it's because they are females. You know, victim complex, oppressün and patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:50 AM
2

Yes, and most of the examples are not about treating people differently based on their gender.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:47 PM
-1

Oh, I missed the baby girl part. You are right obviously. But then it's a retarded example.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:04 PM
-3

digital marketing firm See, that's your problem there. I EMPHASIZED really hard that we talk about programming jobs. The girl in the article applied for a programming job. If not in finances, programming jobs are casual as it gets.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:03 PM
-7

I'm a programmer. I got hired twice wearing tshirts. I won't be surprised when I will get hired for the third time. You have to convince the tech guy, not the HR person.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:02 PM
-4

When I interviewed so far, I mostly did that with tech guys. I don't give a damn about what the HR person thinks about me, they don't really get a say in if I will be hired or not. If a company sends their managers to do hiring, they are doing it wrong, and I don't want to work there. We still talk about programming jobs.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:00 PM
-28

Nonsense? No, this is reality. Seriously, I have no idea about you guys, but you are basically saying I'm lying. Which is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:17 PM
-41

That's simply not true though. I never wore a suit to an interview and I'm not alone. Most places, even multinational companies, are not really strict in this sense, especially with programmers.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:29 AM
7

You have any proof of that? I don't like sentences like this just thrown out. I mean yeah, male tend to get harsher sentences overall, but medical failures tend to not be handled on the same level as intended, planned manslaughter. What is really bad in the article though: Goodluck's parents said after sentencing "not for one minute" did they think the procedure would cause him harm. It shows the bigger picture, some people still have no idea how unnecessarily dangerous circumcision is, especial…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:48 AM
5

Yeah, if the laws let you, record everything.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:09 AM
-40

But she said everyone worked in jeans and tshirts. In a place like that, this attire should be perfectly acceptable. Well, at least to my standards. I interviewed for many kinds of programming jobs, but leisure places never had a problem with my jeans + tshirt. Banks and other financial places required more dressing up, but she says it was not one. I don't know what should a woman wear to an interview though.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:09 AM
14

Not that hard to look up age of consent. It seriously starts to wear on me when we have some news that some 18+ girl fucked a 17 year old guy, and how outrageous RAPE it was and if it were the other way blahblahblah. Yes, the discrimination sucks, but it was just normal sex. Stop the prudery.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:53 AM
5

This is about the small everyday stuff that a lot of people might not even recognize as sexism. Because it's not sexism. Why do we pretend it is?
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:50 AM
3

Meritocracy is the enemy of feminism.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:19 AM
1

That's the problem, feminism is not based on hate. It's much more subtle and malicious than that.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:57 PM
12

Being anti-feminist is not a men's issue, it's a human obligation. Feminism is a dangerous, oppressive ideology, it was never about equality, and should be cast into the box we put other such ideologies.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:02 AM
-52

It's not textbook, because it's published, it happens in the public. This just makes it even more fucked up.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:42 AM
2

Yes, but this is a serious topic. When some video game's sub gets shitty content, that's tough luck. But this should be a cornerstone of MRM.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:57 PM
622

Totally agree. The sub is losing quality at a rapid pace. Oversensitive crybabies popping up everywhere. The culture of the sub is deteriorating.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:33 AM
21

AWARDED. That fucking word, like it's just given out for kisses.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:47 AM
1

See, you still don't even CONSIDER that what reasonable people tell you might be true. Don't become defensive, try to learn!
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:30 AM
1

That's perfectly true. That's why I said in some other comment that until we can measure someone's skill in a really reliable way, this will never happen.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:28 PM
2

That's not true at all. You see, the employer won't pay you money they are not willing to give up. Therefore no matter how much you negotiate, you will fall into a predestined bracket. The weapon in the employer's hand is that you don't know the bracket's borders.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 10:43 AM
5

It is correct, but here is the issue: it's not wrong because of the age. It's wrong because it's a teacher-student relationship. If someone wants to fuck a 17 year old and the 17 year old consents, there is nobody to blame. Other than retarded age of consent laws in some states and countries, but thankfully most goverments are not that prude. This girl is definitely a predator, and I'm pretty sure not all the boys are happy with the outcome, but we really shouldn't pretend that 17 year olds are …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:55 AM
5

Even more importantly, why is it about women? There are men who are intimidated. It's really not a gender issue, more like an assertiveness issue. And I'm one for standardized salaries, not only because this would make my life much easier and more stress-free, but because negotiation benefits the employer, almost always. I don't know why people don't get this. If you are not the hot shit negotiator right out from some Hollywood movie, you will get less than your work's worth.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:52 AM
2

Yeah, sure m8. You don't even entertain the though that you were just a rude, unimaginative asshole to her - who happened to be a retarded feminist, but that doesn't alleviate you at all. It's not us whiteknighting, it's you acting like a butthurt feminist, you know, the ones we should laugh at.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:57 AM
1

I almost read that as women are socially constructed.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:49 PM
-1

You still make false equivalencies. Making a shitpost is bad, because there will be more shitpost. Downvoting shitposts is good, because it doesn't increase the amount of shitpost but contributes in telling the opinion of the community. Commenting on shitposts? It doesn't increase the shitposts, it's basically voting with details. With your kind of reasoning (everybody who says something you don't like is mansplaining, or as you called it, whining) you would be better off in some SJW sub I think…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:48 PM
0

I tried to post, but every time it was already posted. But to be strict, commenting on threads and adding your voice is actually contributing (you know, 90-9-1). But lets put that aside. What is your point? How is my non-contributing relates to the actual shit content of the sub? If someone has nothing valuable to add, they just shouldn't post. It's simple. The amount of posts is not fixed. I would be happier with less posts but higher quality. There are subs where all the posts on the frontpage…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:20 PM
1

It's a company. That's what it means.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:00 PM
-1

Why are there so many shitposts here these days? All these unimportant stuff...
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:27 AM
0

It's not insulting, OP is being oversensitive. Seriously, go find something that is REALLY a problem.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:25 AM
-2

Shitposting at it's best.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:43 AM
8

You don't understand satire either. You were a passive aggressive bitch, not satirical.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:26 AM
2

Why do you say that? Some subs are shit, some are not. What makes reddit as a whole shit for you? I know that when they removed the ability to see comment scores (the up- and downvotes) I was like wow, we now become facebook or what.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:19 AM
1

Ideally yeah, I'm much more happy when I know beforehand what's worth what and that I cant haggle. But this is not reality, first because employers want workers for the cheapest possible price and second because you can't really measure skill (yet?), so you have to rely on self valuing.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:18 AM
3

What do you don't know about it? Github was proudly a meritocracy (it was not, but it advertised itself as one, with a fancy mat), until some feminazi retards took offense and so Github leadership pulled the meritocracy mat. They were always very socially sensitive, and still function as a company.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:19 PM
3

That doesn't mean that other person should get more money now, does it? The company will not profit more from their skills than from the other one's.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:17 PM
6

Yes, I think that if job A requires a skillset that doesn't include negotiating than it shouldn't be included in the pay. I have no idea how can you say otherwise, but you are free to do so.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:51 PM
1

Many people said Voat, Quora is another good example (it's a really different approach though).
/r/MensRights06/04/15 06:03 PM
22

The funny part is, the content is entirely created by the users. So the usernumber is directly linked to the amount of content. If reddit becomes a shit place, people will go somewhere else, and then that place will become the new shit. But I bet it won't. Github went down the SJW path already, and they are still a great service. I guess it's about - and here I will be chauvinistic a little - that men will thrive. Men always thrived. If there is a product that can bring you money, men (and sane …
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:58 PM
3

Obviously. It's a quote (apart from the last part), and even if you don't know that, it's painfully obvious. But the downvotes show that most people are actually functional retards.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:54 PM
15

There are actually are. The problem is the same as with social networking sites, the greatest asset a site can have is it's actual userbase. Users lure users. Reddit is an aggregate site, ALL the content is produced by the visitors. The more people, the more content. The site's only task is to give you a framework where you can filter the content to get what interests you. Plenty of pages do that.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:53 PM
95

That's such a fucking bogus thing to bring up. I'm a guy with a shitty negotiating skill. I get paid less. No feminist came to me to fight for my wage gap. It's not discrimination against women, it's discrimination against less assertive people. And in theory it's a good idea to eliminate that, because in most jobs you need other kinds of skills. But it's a job market, and it's called a market for a reason.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:47 PM
38

It looks like a meritocracy is oppressive to equality. At one hand, fixed salaries are fine by me, because I'm one of those guys who is the girl when it comes to assertiveness and wage wars. On the other hand you can never estimate someone's worth perfectly.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:44 PM
1

After reading this, I'm even more confused. Well, I guess nobody knows the actual reality, we only have sides and opinions.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:20 PM
1

a lovely sight then. i was just confused, because Stross was mentioned as sjw-approved, but he is a great writer.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:25 AM
1

if you understand this, can you explain what is in the article? iread it and the comments here, and still have no idea.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:45 PM
1

Please, I almost cut myself on your edges. It's about making the sub less like feminism.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:12 AM
3

While I DO think men are more prone to make such "sacrifices", I agree, I don't see why is this posted here.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:15 AM
1

Now we are into intersectional MRM. God no, please.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:08 PM
10

This whole shit is really not surprising, after feminists crying about Github's meritocracy mat. It's like being judged by your skills and knowledge is oppressive to women.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 11:25 AM
2

On the other hand, there are guys who specifically go for fat women. So I don't see the problem, if you don't want to change, and he doesn't want to change, then the relationship is over. Nobody is to blame, well, maybe you a bit, because entering a relationship is a mutual contract that you will keep your positive attributes.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 10:15 AM
10

The original is not there anymore, but the rest is not much better. Given the reality of women's oppression Muh oppressunz. But. Why is this linked here? You seriously think urbandictionary or any independent website should adhere with your standards? And Why Are You Writing Like This?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:15 AM
-12

The girl is cute, but if someone is nagging you, any gender, you say no. If a girl behaves like the guy in the vid, it's really not better, and it's not more tolerated, I would hope.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:59 AM
17

They test the waters. Waters not ready yet for THAT amount of bullshit. Soon...
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:56 AM
2

Meh. No thanks, this post itself is very "hurr hurr imma so honest durr durr" and the article is painfully badly written.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 09:09 PM
1

Meh, there are some places where it was needed, if we consider equality with respect to sex a desirable goal. That's the point: it was never about that. The whole women requiring a male cosigner for loans thing was bullshit And in the next part of the sentence you disprove your own point. There are plenty of feminism-related things that have been positive changes in the world Feminism-related? That's pretty vague. And how do you define positive? I guess you think the traditional muslim countries…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 07:32 PM
2

Unarmed, but how will the cop know that?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:55 PM
3

If you don't have that strong, raspy voice that Goldberg has, you are out of luck on that panel.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:54 PM
2

When that stupid cunt (no other name for her, sorry) says that's blaming the victim... what victim, sweetheart? Who is the victim if you start flailing and I hit back? Don't answer, in your distorted worldview, women are always the victim, regardless of the circumstances.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:53 PM
4

When people say that feminism was good once, back then, and that it's still needed in other countries, I always remember Karen's talks. Fucking enlightening. These believes are deeply rooted that when you realize it's bullshit, it's all just male disposability and the "women are beautiful" effect, it makes you watch things with a different eye.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:43 PM
-1

I'm not a fan of bashing subs, it's too generic for my taste, but 2x is like /r/feminism light, where people who, deep in their hearts agree with the message, but don't want to show it because they know it's distasteful go.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:55 AM
5

So, there are women who want no men around them, there are men who want no women around them, and then there is the most of society, which is fine living with people of the opposite sex. I think we should just remove the minorities, not the majority. And I bet you that men will survive longer on their own.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:43 AM
1

I have no idea, I didn't read the article after the first couple paragraphs, not my taste, this sentence put me off: To which my own, irritable response was yes, of course, they/we, can; why state the obvious? Why state the obvious? Because you still don't do it. Duh. But this guy made a more in-depth analysis.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:08 AM
2

Can't take this article seriously. Non-Roma children bullied, teased and ostracized Roma students It's just not realistic. If someone knows gypsies, they are not the kinds who will get bullied by white children. It's actually the reverse.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:22 AM
1

It's called perspective. There is a ton of context which is assumed by many people, text is never just the letters written, it's always a ton more. If you know more about the speaker you will understand their real message better.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:18 AM
1

Tried it (in small), now everybody just hates me :)
/r/MensRights25/03/15 11:13 AM
1

Well yeah, Swedish are already broken. Seriously, I read shit I wouldn't believe true if not for the shit I already know for being true. The guilt forced into those men is just too much.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:15 PM
2

Thank you for not putting /s after your text. The most annoying trend in reddit for me right now. Takes the fun out of sarcasm, rendering everyone to a children's mental level.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:44 PM
1

Thought it would be a great idea, men probably open up easily to women (like everyone else), they don't want to show weakness before other men. But the article doesn't even mention them. Well, fuck.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:40 PM
8

you guys are the epicenter of the war on men. I think you mean Sweden. It's funny and sad at the same time that we can have contests on who is more PC and feminized.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:39 PM
5

I think he got it from the wrong angle. It is expected of a man to have a job, to support himself. And that's fine. What is not fine is that the same is not expected of women, and if you complain to your girlfriend/wife about it, you lose man-points, and if you do it publicly, you are shamed before all people. There is this weird double thinking, on one hand it is shameful for a woman, on the other hand you can't hold it against her, because then you are a failure as a man.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:07 PM
5

A bit too obvious, but still provoked the right response.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:46 AM
1

Ignore it?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:08 PM
6

The usual answer from feminists is that it's not about being parents, it's about bodily autonomy. Hard to argue with this, because it's really not symmetrical between the sexes, but i just feel it's bullshitting and it IS about being parents and female privilege, they just know that can't be defended.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:20 AM
0

And to pretend that has already been accomplished? What was not understandable in the "until then" part?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:55 AM
1

Not only that, women are generally not eager to get into visible leader positions. Then you don't have the plausible deniability. It's responsibility for money. Women can get the money without such responsibility, and who would choose responsibility if they could avoid it?
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:21 PM
1

Fuck yeah. As tumblr would say, oppressed are justified to rage against their oppressors!
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:34 PM
1

These are all shit you CAN change. Socially, genetically. But until then, you just have to fight it.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:33 PM
23

Me neither. I stopped at "Yeah, there is no competition". I get so fucking raged when I see shit like this. And my company does this too, "we need more female programmers yaaaay" fuck you, we need more programmers, period.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:10 PM
5

You are fucking right. How easy would it be to ungender a ton of the problems that exist in the world. Wage gap is one of them. Many men take home less than other men, solely because of their decisions. It's not a gendered problem, you could argue that it's not a problem at all, but I wouldn't go that far.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:28 PM
1

Could you NOT link to youtube playlists? Otherwise, would have loved a less US-focused video, because it suggests that the problem is not so prevalent in other 1st world countries.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:54 PM
4

It did generate a shitstorm, just check TiA. The more important thing is, is it necessary (both this and the original)? The message is very bad, it just makes people entitled assholes, and as an added plus, if they are boys, they will fall VERY flat on their faces when reality comes saying hello. Girls will only become feminists.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:26 PM
12

Not necessarily women in class, maybe it's only that one girl. Don't make assumptions, even when we KNOW there is systematic bias. Individual cases must be handled as such.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:20 PM
3

Considering that 50 is a female erotic fantasy, I fail to see how it's misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 12:11 PM
1

It's actually simple. If men are privileged, they are privileged over women (who else?). So there is no sense talking about male AND female privilege, in a binary world view.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 12:13 PM
3

Degree of English literature. Sure, that's more than most, but so does serial killer's death toll. It doesn't mean it's BETTER.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:23 PM
9

This girl is retarded. I guess everyone would be asked how do they look, which includes their garments. Being a bard, you are pretty much lean on your looks, so it's extra important to ask you what are you wearing.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:49 PM
1

He never said that a kilt is a skirt. Get a hold of your English, Scotsman!
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:02 AM
2

This fucking article. Just look at it. The first FOUR paragraphs (including the title) as the same fucking sentence. Who writes these? Who edits them? Why?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:01 AM
5

Okay, maybe softwired. But from an early age this society teaches you this. It doesn't really matter from the perspective of the already developed man if it's biology or sociology. We can only really save the future, if at all.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 06:21 PM
1

They are right actually. The fact that maleness is all about protecting women and bashing other men who don't protect women is what keeps men back, because still, most politicians and basically the majority of people with any power are men. So if men wouldn't be so fucked up by evolution to do anything to protect women we wouldn't have this problem at all. We are hard wired to place women's interests above ours and other men's.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:01 PM
4

I would agree. But most people only see women suffering, and if you say that women and men are almost always share their suffering you get downvoted (on reddit) or banned, shouted down etc.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 08:51 PM
2

It's blabbering about terminology and nitpicking bullshit. No, thanks.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:55 AM
11

I'm much more concerned about getting people to understand that in those infamous Islamic worlds it's not that women are oppressed and men live as kings, it's that men and women both live shitty, oppressed lives (to OUR pov, they might as well enjoy it for all I know). It's so hard to get it into someone's head that if women suffer, men will suffer much worse shit, because disposability.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:49 AM
1

I am the sorry one if you feel my outburst was unprovoked. It's probably that I spent too much time on 9gag (don't ask why, I have no idea, probably a fiddling activity to avoid work) which is full of 12 year olds thinking they are the shit for discovering something common knowledge.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:38 AM
-5

Has anyone else ever Yeah, you are the first, the true hero of the MRM! Seriously, what do you think NAFALT means? What is the "no true Scotsman" fallacy and why it's mentioned with feminism so much?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:20 AM
3

Or you are ugly as hell. I don't say she is a prize, but she is not nearly ugly enough to not receive shit like this. I don't see how this is sue-worthy, but then again, that's America.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:17 AM
1

I don't understand. Why would the non-rich parent have to go work if there is no alimony? Yeah, they would have less assurance overall, they would have to trust their partner and create a relationship based on real shit, but it doesn't make it impossible.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:48 AM
1

A relatively poor country (poorer than western ones, still high above the average), the eastern parts of central EU.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:43 AM
1

They are not really a thing here
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:54 PM
1

Legal options? You mean legal obligations.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:20 PM
1

I know, I live in a relatively poor country. I guess people would WANT to stay at home if they could afford it. But is it worth it?
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:25 PM
3

This is pure bullshit. I have no idea who Paul is, but this screen, without more context reflects pretty badly on him. Passive agressive, insecure, basically an all around cunt.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:32 PM
1

Are stay at home parents necessary? They are not really a thing here, because you can't support a family from one person's earning.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:29 PM
1

Yeah, and I talked about that. Looks like it was not clear.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:57 PM
-2

doesn't matter anymore. English, do you speak it? When you will be dead, you won't care about being dead. Until then, yeah, it's fun to be alive.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:28 PM
1

Well, you HAVE TO attack some women (and a couple men), because they actively working against gender equality.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:03 PM
-1

Love how you spare one handwaving sentence for feminism.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:02 PM
-6

Well, from an atheist PoV, it really doesn't matter anymore. But yeah, I would love to live a bit longer.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:14 PM
38

Body integrity is a much better example, it's still legal to circumcise boys in a lot of countries, while this selective service thing is really specific to the US.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:13 PM
1

Wait, so now we have to think everyone is a retard and won't recognize obvious satire? I seriously think this /s-ing everything lest someone has to use their brains is degrading as hell.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:11 PM
21

He’s a white male. I’m a black Jewish female. So Adria is a fucking racist and a sexist and religionist. Basically an all around bigot. Why should we feel any empathy towards her?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:57 AM
-2

I hate it when comedians talk shit like this, because I feel like I'm somehow be the idiot when I say fuck you. But to Aziz: fuck you. You are retarded.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 08:31 AM
2

It's the opposite: everyone knows sexism is wrong, so redefine sexism to exclude what we do so everyone will think it's not wrong.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 08:18 PM
11

This so much. People (here as well and any average person, not just feminists) have no idea what words mean. They call everything sexist, racist, fascist.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:09 PM
7

It's simply derailing the conversation. Call it whatever you want, it's shitty behavior that should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:08 PM
2

I don't think any of it is sexist, being dumb is not sexist, being male or female is not sexist.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 12:07 PM
0

This so much. The girl is beautiful, her voice is ok, but the whole thing is off, forcibly artistic.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 08:25 PM
32

The fact that you felt the need to put that /s to the end... there are people who would take it seriously.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:38 PM
8

I'm fine with the flowers shit. People surprise each other with stuff all the time. I bring some flowers, she cooks me some cookies. Perfectly fine if it's in balance.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:37 PM
2

Change the last word to human and I agree 100%.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:35 PM
1

Interestingly enough, the same is true for feminists. When men speak up on such issues, their motives are suspicious.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 10:51 AM
6

Well, many MRAs ARE frustrated men. If you have a problem you cannot solve that causes frustration. And many people become MRAs when they start to have problems.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 10:50 AM
2

What is not nice is she can think and say with a straight face these contradicting stuffs.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 10:42 AM
2

Little story. My company had this "girls to code" event (a series of event, actually), where they invited a dozen or so girls to code and show them how a software company works etc. When I asked why is this a gender-specific thing, I only got the usual shit: girls need to be encouraged (boys don't? I think a ton more boys would come with a little encouragement), it's good to have a diverse workforce, that women have a different way of thinking (so you say that women are so different that you hav…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:19 AM
2

python for like 2 years. I dont need that shit. Hey, Python is a great language, and apart from heavy graphics or physics or whatever, I don't see how is it inadequate.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:00 AM
3

No, feminism never worked in these clear ways. But you are on a good way to reach it, step by step.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:34 PM
2

The case when women come and want to make the place SAFE and WELCOMING to people, and by people I mean women, because men are used to dealing with assholes. I'm more into gaming, but this is a fucking mirror of that.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:56 PM
3

It depends on the feminist. Yeah, and no true Scotsman would X. Acts speak louder than words. Anyone can call themselves a feminist and anyone can do anything, therefore feminism is what I want it to be? No, feminism is a hate movement.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:16 PM
12

That's something people try to avoid answering. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:08 PM
-2

This Thorin guy... not the first time he steals some great comedian's special and dresses it up as some womanhating shit. It's like someone forcing him to buy shit to women.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:46 PM
2

I see. I think I sounded more attacking than I intended, or more precisely more attacking than I should have sounded. You are actually right, this is (or might be) an important factor, at least to my slim understanding of this racial issue, living in a mostly homogeneous country.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:08 PM
3

And I know a couple dumb ones (and some good). Anecdotal evidence is not really evidence. Women are good or bad just as men are, just more rare. Simple enough.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:06 PM
2

minority male students Why is that so important?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:02 PM
7

Surely because women just don't use paper towels, and it's still the first fill.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:39 PM
1

I just pointed out that she didn't say anything like you trying to tell us she said.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 01:28 PM
1

To be honest, she did not say you are sexist/etc for subscribing. She might have checked your actual post history.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:53 AM
3

But if hippies sit in juries making stupid verdicts, then yes, hippies are a problem. And by hippies I think /u/ThePedanticCynic meant the brainwashed masses that nod to feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:45 AM
1

Usually women are only violent when the man causes it. Well, that IS true, true for men as well. Nobody is violent without some (sane) reason, except insane people. That doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:39 AM
4

Don't get me started on Emma, please! I can't decide if ignorance or malignance is worse.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:37 AM
7

Seriously? Fighting oversensitivity with oversensitivity? Even if I would be interested in the movie, I wouldn't care. It's one character. To quote from your post: I am all for free speech and freedom of expression. So leave it at that.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:46 PM
1

Yes, you are a part of it, and sadly a not too bright, but rather more enthusiastic one. Your kind of people lead every movement astray. You still didn't give any good reason as to how something's past is any basis on judging it in the present when you have GOOD INFORMATION about it's present behavior. It's like holding someone accountable for something they already had their jail sentence for any they obviously regretted and changed.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:27 PM
1

So you don't understand what I'm saying, you write a wall of text explaining to me how you don't understand it, and then you accuse me of not getting the point. Try to read it again. My STARTING point was the assumption that feminism got to be a good movement. I don't care how or how you measure it, this was the basic assumption of the conditional sentence.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:24 PM
1

If a group are calling themselves nazi's and their sole activity is rescuing orphan ducklings, I would support them after making sure they really are not national socialists with interesting ideas about race and superiority. Similarly, if feminism becomes something I could support under a different name, I will support it, regardless of the word's and movement's past.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:55 PM
1

Remember them talking about genital mutilation? Where the girl just insisted that any FGM is MUCH worse than MGM. With no basis whatsoever, just from emotions. That was bullshit as well. And Karen has a LOT of experience remaining calm I guess, the amount of idiots you have to confront when going against the common opinion (not only feminists, but the common knowledge about female oppression in history).
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:49 PM
1

I wouldn't mind a feminism that would act rationally, and bringing up the past doesn't help anyone.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:43 PM
1

The phrase benevolent sexism is pretty fucking sexist though. It implies that sexism is when women are discriminated (against by default) and benevolent sexism is therefore when this discrimination is beneficial. But as there are only two sexes, if you discriminate one you discriminate the other.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:41 PM
0

women are often treated like absolute shit in certain countries (particularly Saudi Arabia and countries practising similar religious bullshit in their legal system) Wait, you think MEN are treated better in those countries? See, that's why I'm sad. Even people who think they are for equality are blind to the actual truth of things. It's always in balance, rights and responsibilities. Well, more-or-less in balance, except when social changes happen, but if you say that women are so badly treated…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:31 PM
3

No, you downvote something because it does not belong. As I said, I totally agree with Bill.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:15 PM
3

Yeah, but you know, being a Jew is pretty much decided when the child is conceived. That's the joke. Not the anti-semitism.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:28 AM
2

I was thinking about downvoting not because I disagree with Burr (he is my favorite comedian so far, no bullshit, no obviously fake approach), but because 1) it's only marginally relevant to the sub 2) the MGTOW decoration around the special. You can find links to his specials on youtube, you could link to those.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:21 AM
19

He does address those stuff though, so it's quite fair to not blame him for not bringing a whole and equal table of arguments to a comedy show.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:18 AM
-1

Must know more. Was this her ex that called? Your ex? Till now I agree, wanted to know the same. Is her name Jenny? Now this starts to sound personal! Even more intrigued.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:16 AM
3

Not even Bill Burr? :D That guy is hilariously spot on with a lot of shit, about women and relationships as well.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:15 AM
-4

Well not, actually. Hitting girls (specifically girls) is a gendered issue by society. If we talk about boko haram killings, then yeah, this is an issue. Here we have pictures to the kids, and they are obviously boys, so I don't see the fucking issue. /u/rhinotuna is right, more and more people find offense where there is none.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:15 PM
2

Kids of Color are kind of rare in Italy, compared to the US.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:13 PM
-1

Ok, this thing is pretty old and it's pretty sexist, but the title here is just stupid. No, it's just a phrasing, everyone sees they are boys. It's not a feminist conspiracy to call them kids.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:13 PM
1

Wait, now we are back to argue on the basis of authority? Seriously? Patriarchy is bullshit, but how is it relevant that one guy is a 33 years old vet and the other is 22 with a worthless education? We should only focus on the actual arguments and opinions, not the person behind it.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:02 PM
1

I wouldn't say 100 kilos are needed for muscle to be an issue. Even a fifty kilogram stuff can be a hassle if it doesn't have a good handle, it has a big momentum and all. If I can lift something with a good handle (like a bar or a dumbbell) it doesn't mean I will be able to handle a furniture the same weight. But if I can lift it easily, then I probably will be able to navigate something with a less handy reach.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:46 PM
0

What do you want to say? Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. You can easily switch the genders. I won't participate in a relationship which is not beneficial to me, and I expect the other to behave similarly.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 12:21 PM
1

TiA: /r/TumblrInAction All your needs of tumblr feminists and all the other retards.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:04 AM
1

They are a very little oppressed, but it's nothing compared to womyn or POC. At least that's what TiA leads me to believe.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 08:37 AM
1

No, he is not. You need to spend less time on tumblr.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:34 PM
1

It feels good to be just awkward around crying people. I'm pretty sure I'm not a sociopath, but my social awkwardness protects somewhat me from manipulation.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:31 PM
2

Being male (especially white) overrides any "oppression" you might suffer in the eyes of sjws, see gays.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:07 AM
2

Well, you know. Those men who are not in the privileged group are hurt by the patriarchy as well, so it's menz fault. Feminist logic.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:12 PM
16

This. Should we turn into oversensitive femi maninazis, or what? I think not.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:22 PM
2

The repost-warning didn't fire, because you didn't sanitize your URL (you should always remove the clutter from the URL, usually most of the shit after ? is superfluous, in youtube's case, anything other than the v=XXXXX part is something useless (except if you want to link to a list, but you don't want to do that, right?))? Well, you should sanitize URLs, and check the front page anyways.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 12:28 PM
3

It IS gendered though. I can't cite a study, but from experience, women tend to move out of the way less than men.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:53 AM
11

Apart from your very interesting defining points. The point is: I don't care about if you are a man or a woman. If you are treated badly because other people see you as a man, that's MRM area. If for some other reason, then it's some other movement and basic empathy.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:15 PM
8

Yeah, but the question is still valid, the sub mostly focuses on points where men are treated in a worse manner than women. To answer that question: I think transmen are perfectly welcome as men, the problem arises when you try to include intersectionality, the newwave feminist buzzword. It's not a men's rights issue if you are discriminated for being trans. It's a shitty thing, but not an issue for the MRM. Obviously as individuals we support more than one movement, therefore equality for every…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 11:59 AM
2

Why is this an Outrage?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:33 AM
-4

Hey, diversity is important, right?
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:38 PM
1

In every movement, there are people who try to ride it.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 12:43 PM
1

I hope everyone saw what I saw. A woman with an annoying voice (and I'm not talking about her natural pitch or voice, it's HOW she uses it) spewing lies all around and misguiding the talk with half truths and irrelevant data. Emotional arguing at it's best.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:29 PM
2

Women in general are not that assertive as men in general. The thing is, a lot of men are not that assertive as the more assertive men, there is a huge spread in the distribution. And we don't do anything about it, because we don't need to.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 10:25 AM
1

So basically we have the same knowledge, but don't agree on the word scientist. I think it's like artist. Is anyone an artist who draws a stick figure? Is anyone a scientist who thinks and works on problems? Hard to identify. I like to draw the line at people who have published papers or work on their first one. Obviously not perfect, but at least more or less exact. But I agree, a master's thesis can be a serious research, especially in theoretical areas. It's just that I wouldn't necessarily c…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:22 PM
1

I might be mistaken, if so, I apologize to Master's students and /u/Atheist101 If I understand correctly, Master's is the 2nd step of the high end education. At the end you write a thesis, but don't do much research before that, you still learn the ropes. Most people who want to research go to Phd programs and such.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 09:33 AM
1

Not rational at that moment, at that topic. All of us have these moments and topics, some more, some less.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 09:30 AM
1

I should show my arguing diploma? It's all just personal experience. I don't think anyone who treat women preferably are white knights, the latter are some extreme cases of some mental stuff.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:12 PM
0

Well, they are not. I have a masters, and I really don't consider myself a scientist. And looking through my (ex)mates, I wouldn't consider them either. Ok, it's just CS (not even called CS here, it's more like engineering), but real sciences are not much better either. Those are scientists in TRAINING. Until you have some papers published, you really can't be considered a scientist.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:50 PM
3

Thank you. This is great. I really hate when people from all backgrounds just awe that how good her speech was, when in reality, it was an awful thing. Awful, because it was not an honest feminazi spewing of shit, but a very malicious and misguided message hidden in a beautiful cocoon of nice words and Hermione. She says that men has it hard too, THEREFORE let's all help women! She uses the 3rd world countries to propagate feminism in the west. I was shocked that so many rational people found th…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:47 AM
3

This. I don't understand why people try to use their western logic on terrorists' minds. They are different, vastly. They are ready to die for something (for us) stupid.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:35 AM
3

Yeah, that's what bothered me as well. This is a thesis. It's nothing really significant, until actual scientists start to work on it.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:32 AM
24

Not really. I have a ton of experience arguing with people about stuff, where if you don't treat women preferably, even the most rational guys will attack you. It's too deep in our society.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:30 AM
0

you'd say that a gender-based sentencing disparity of 60% was "retarded" as well. Seriously? Are you 12?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:32 PM
0

And your thesis is that there is extreme bias, but only in sentencing. This is not my thesis. I don't have a thesis. YOUR thesis is that the bias is the same at all levels. Which have no basis whatsoever.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:31 PM
1

I have no problem finding this funny in a way, I have no emotional connection to strangers. It happens once, it's awful, but I don't really care, people die every day. But when it happens twice it has a twirl that might be considered funny. The problem comes when it's considered bad manners to laugh at similar things happening to women. The only problem is the asymmetry.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:22 AM
0

First of all, fuck off with this white knight bullshit. You are retarded, and I point it out, this doesn't make me anything but a rational person. Second. You make two assumptions, which are highly dubious. One is that there are these 5 distinct steps and the second is that at every step there is this same chance of advancing forward. Totally without any base whatsoever. Your 0.63 number is the ratio of sentence for equal crime. That doesn't mean ANYTHING whatsoever to the actual probability of …
/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:15 AM
0

How the fuck am I a white knight when you are spewing nonsense and I just point it out? You pulled a number out of your ass (5) and used it to prove that the same amount of women are criminals as men. Which might be true, but we have no way to prove it as long as the justice system is so biased towards women.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:59 AM
1

Flipping a coin is a simple matter, especially if you reduce the whole problem to a given chance. Flipping it TEN times gives you the power 10. But what about being arrested? How on Earth did you find that 5? Oh, I know, you tried other numbers, and this was closest to the desired result.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:47 AM
0

Just as easily I could say it's two steps (1. is the person even considered 2. if the person is guilty, how long are they sentenced), and then the whole calculation goes down the toilet. These 5 steps are chosen as 5 exactly so it gives the correct value. Having a result and later building up the theory behind it is propaganda and radical feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:42 AM
4

It shows that you care about her and that you’re capable of being selfless. What the fuck am I reading.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:04 PM
-6

That power to the 5 was a retarded math. Didn't read after that. Okay for a joke, but you seem serious, so down you go.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:58 PM
2

I'm a man. I like to rape, kill babies, consume them over a period of months, and, of course, molest children. Why repeat it?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:57 AM
2

Ouch.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:49 PM
1

So you say that those people in the congress decide everything on their own, based on their own experiences? You try to imply that?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:19 PM
1

Tell me why is that better.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:58 PM
2

But OP talked about wider things than this case. I talked about those. For the current case is simply: why do you think terrorists and their motivations are relevant for our society? MRM is still mostly about western countries (hence the flag on this sub for eastern issues), and terrorists are not at all ordinary people.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:33 PM
0

The current situation was NOT a combat situation though.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 04:02 PM
0

Well, in combat situations it's more likely that men are considered as threats, and women as harmless civilians. Don't know, in this current case, if two armed guys come in and say you can live if you have a pussy, I would grow one instantly, and not worry about discrimination or otherwise. You shouldn't look for reason with terrorists, they are not representative of our society.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:36 PM
-2

That's really flawed logic. By the direct orders of the prophet and God, you don't protect HIM from the morons, your protect YOURSELF by killing the morons. If you don't do it, you will be punished as well. Not that I agree with radicals, just that if you want to argue, argue well.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:33 PM
1

How is this a problem though? You can't have equal representation of everyone, there are too many types of people living in a country. Equal representation makes sense when we talk about groups that are not necessarily friendly with each other, but men and women are not two such groups.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:31 PM
1

I can't think of a better company in the video game industry about this womyn issues than Valve. They just don't give a shit, treating women just the same as men, and just give us awesome games, for free (with hats), for fair money, for whatever. No pandering to retarded PC audience like BioWare.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:11 PM
13

That... was unexpectedly funny from this sub. You are my favorite mod as of now, until further funny stuff I stumble upon!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:01 PM
0

Seriously, is this red pill or what? Some good points with a ton of bullshit, sexist or straight up idiotic.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:17 PM
-1

As it's a US only thing, only from solidarity. It's a fucked up thing. Well, at least you have a choice in the matter, a lot of countries have draft, mandatory. But it's a very choice example of inequality.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:26 PM
5

This BUT THERE IS WORSE!!! argument is total bullshit, you know that, right?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:23 PM
2

“And I have a lot of insecurity about taking up space and learning how to do something that involves my body, falling and making mistakes.” Guess what, a lot of guys have this too.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:22 PM
2

Just lets hope he doesn't die of his cancer.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:02 PM
1

While this might be true, I would like to think that we go towards a more rational age.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:11 PM
2

You know, racism is power + prejudice, so you can't be racist against whites (lets ignore where even this skewed definition makes you racist, like in South Africa). So lets invent a new word, neoracist or whatever, to everyone who is a dick to someone based on race.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:26 PM
1

Obama said that? The fuck is wrong with that country?
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:50 AM
3

I don't think it's that. Wikipedia mirrors the known stuff, or at least should. Right now, feminism is the mainstream idea, therefore that is what's written. But anything can get in if sourced and relevant.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:27 AM
3

I agree with the title: lets close women's prison and make them ungendered prisons. The article is bogus.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:56 PM
1

I don't want to mansplain your mansplaiton, but the opposite thing is Newton's third.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 06:16 PM
1

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. What phenomenon does it explain? I don't see any. And lets not imply that it's scientific, using a word hypothesis sounds too much like something an actual scientist would create.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:13 PM
0

This is some low quality stuff. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:48 AM
1

It's interesting, because outside the US circumcision is not an issue, it's a small thing, but I can emphasize with that the most, as I have no family or children yet and I never got raped or hurt too much. I'm also intact, but I feel the pain of others who are not. For me, the biggest issue is not a legal one but a social, so it's very hard to grasp it. I have a very strong sense of justice, and the every day double standards just hurt me. Like, the international woman's day, I said ok, everyth…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:11 AM
6

This is a very nice thing to do, bringing these issues to the mainstream. At 6:30 when the girl talks about the boy not having issues with his penis... just look a bit more far, like to Europe. You don't have to chop off skin for a boy to be happy.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:31 AM
5

Didn't read it, but it's pretty obvious: men are competition to each other.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:45 AM
2

My first thought. I can totally understand Canada, the punishment is hugely excessive. The thing though, try to reverse the genders. If they give a man asylum in a similar situation, than it's fine.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:43 AM
4

While that's true, we moved away largely from this evolution thing. I mean, the human race is not in danger of extinction, and children grow up with bad parenting, and will make more children. So actually being a good mother is not exactly an important job from an objective perspective. For the children and society, yeah, it would be nice.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:40 AM
0

They are right, if that is the only concern about dress code that you have to be dressed up. Women can look professional without being all buttoned up. You have to make them understand that there are other concerns.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:25 AM
1

Ok, it's not worth talking about worldwide statistics. Talk about the wester world, the "white" culture. I think it's even higher in the developed countries.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:51 PM
8

And he has no idea how many women go 30 or more years without being assaulted at all. He needs some facts in his life.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:45 AM
1

There is a reason, a reason you hear every day if you are a programmer and working on a large codebase: historical reasons. Things change faster then their names.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:24 PM
1

Hey. Marx wasn't a Marxist. Machiavelli wasn't a Machiavellist. Names are just names, you can't argue with that. Yes, it's not the best name, but we don't live in a vacuum, history affects us.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 09:17 AM
1

First of all, I don't call myself a feminist, as I personally agree with you that mainstream feminism is gynocentrist. But not everyone agrees with this, and it's actually not an important point of the MRM, it's just a consequence of the actual values and believes of MRAs. Talking about if you are anti-feminism or not is exactly the derailment you don't want in an actual debate. It may give leverage when people try to defame you.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:33 PM
1

Nah, feminism is a very broad ideology. When you say anti-feminism you usually mean anti-radical-feminism or something like that (who knows how they call themselves these days). The subreddit is not declared against feminism, it just happens that in many issues feminists and MRAs are on opposite sides.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:08 PM
1

Yeah, but not in the mainstream media, supported by mainstream everything. It's the same as when the socialists still called it a revolution, even though it was going on for decades and it was the established order.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:07 AM
1

If you think this about ALL the women, then yeah. If you think this about this particular person then it's a bit weird but understandable.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:07 AM
0

So you want to degrade yourself down to the feminists level? No, gender is not important in that we want equality for all. Feminists already have their answer to women who are not feminists (or even actively oppose them): internalized misogyny. We know that not only men are for men's rights, with this many people out there it would be quite weird if there wouldn't be overlaps in every area of life. We don't need to prove this to feminists, it's proven. We, as a movement are not even anti-feminis…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:30 PM
-10

Yeah. This is exactly why i pressed down automatically. If she feels her gender is actually important, there must be something wrong. Either with her thinking, her intentions or her maturity.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:52 PM
1

Ok, so you don't want to be actually productive or even make sense. That's fine, just don't rob my time.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:43 PM
1

What is wrong with you. I wrote it down pretty clearly. They claim they are in a war zone because people wear bullet proof vests. This is what i said. Don't try to strawman me. I never said what you try to say i said. And actually, "rape culture", if it would exist, would come from exactly these cultural things, so even if we are retarded and try to misinterpret my sentence, I was right. But I didn't say anything like that.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:30 PM
1

Ah, so you dragged this shit this long to argue about semantics. See, this is the definition of "not worth". Also, if you would think twice, you would realize that formal logics are not easily applied to spoken language. That because is not a simple implication that X because Y. Actually the predicate was that "they claim", not that "there is". So to clarify: you dragged this, not wanting to reveal your "ace", and you were wrong all along. Don't mind if I flag you as a troll/autistic/loser.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:23 PM
1

I read the article. I made my conclusions. They are true, as far as i'm concerned, as nobody provided any proof against them. You didn't prove them untrue, just added yet another meaningless paragraph to your denial-series, spiced up with some subreddit-bashing.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:27 PM
1

Rape culture as we see it in North America mostly exists with the handling and aftermath of rape cases. This is seen through the treatment of the victim. If the victim was a woman, often questions like “well, what were you wearing?” are asked, which is indicative of rape culture. Try to be a bit more constructive, because so far you only denied what i wrote without providing anything.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:01 PM
1

They claim there is rape culture because police asks questions of the alleged victim. Why would they ask questions? If they would have said neighbors, relatives and "friends" ask these questions then yeah, it can be stretched to be victim blaming. But the police? It's their job to protect the people, best protection is prevention. Only feminists deny the usefulness of risk minimization.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:43 PM
1

Ok, this is one paragraph, the others are meaningless bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:06 PM
1

They say nothing specific, just claim that there IS a rape culture, because police wants to protect others from being victims. This in 2 pages.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:16 AM
5

This. Patriarchy is (even though it does not exist in the western world anymore) a system, a system of habits and social rules. It's not men's fault that it became the norm at some point, it's everyone's and nobody's. The problem is, blaming the patriarchy is not enough, because you can't picture a system as enemy without actual people to hate. That's where men come into the picture. But once again, the whole discussion is moot, because we do not live in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:03 AM
2

Reading this, seemingly rational people claiming bullshit and jumping huge logical steps (like with the pay "gap"). It's sad.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:57 AM
0

Did i say anything about it being digital?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:54 PM
3

Would have been more funny (yes, being banned from r/feminism cannot be called anything more serious), if you would be the other guy who asks where are you from. Banned by being sympathetic to a bad guy.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:11 PM
4

It's still called confirmation bias. Imagine this person's "in depth" dialogues. Probably got downvoted to hell for saying stupid bullshit, showing 0 tendency to actually consider other things that already support their worldview. Then one person says something stupid, and there you go, MRAs say women don't face a single issue.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:33 PM
-2

I'm just thinking, how can you talk about computer centuries before Alan Turing was even born? I mean, a calculator is not a computer (even though it computes, but that's not what we call a computer). Meh, whatever, it's offtopic.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:47 AM
10

It happened too many times that an issue got solved, but only for women. Shelters, healthcare etc. See the pattern? Men are left behind, and a gender neutral problem becomes a men's issue.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:11 AM
1

It's not about self-esteem. If you think cooing your girlfriend on Valentine's is degrading for you, don't do it. Nobody is forcing you! At the same time, start to investigate yourself, try to get some self awareness, because it's only crawling if you crawl. And this is how the other men would see it, they don't crawl, they are kind to the ladies. Gender roles and all. Men and women are not equal, and never will be, sexual dimorphism and all. You sound like you want to "revenge" something, which…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:16 AM
1

My first thought. The more men act rejecting, the more the remaining men will benefit from it. And every men knows this, so it would never work. And it shouldn't. What do you want to demonstrate? I never bought anything on valentine's, never did anything special. It's just a thing you have to speak about with your SO.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:45 AM
1

It was very nice to see you argue with them, even though they don't want to understand. But the question still stands. We have a definition of patriarchy which contradicts our current reality, so obviously the feminist buzzword patriarchy must mean something else. So what are we talking about? Shouldn't we define first what is the thing in which we believe or not?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:40 AM
1

The primary difference between the two is The Illuminati is considered an actual group of people whereas The Patriarchy is more of an abstract idea. Nah, this the truth, the problem is, in misguided people's heads the Illuminaty is an urban legend and the Patriarchy is a real thing, an organization of men oppressing women and men.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:35 AM
3

He says so retarded things sometimes, you can't not downvote some of his posts. I would love to have a debate, but this is not one. This is him coming here with a strict worldview that has women suffering, and not willing to think about the reality. We don't need that.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 08:15 AM
0

Nah, still no need to be an ass. You see that i'm not an ass, also i'm not pedantic, i myself told that in everyday talk they overlap. Now to the topic. I didn't learn this in English. We call arithmetic mean as 'average', everywhere, every place, every*. Any other means are not called average. Therefore average IS sensitive to extremes. The median is NOT the average (it can have the same value of course with specific data).
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:47 PM
5

This so much. Simply looking at statistics would tell them the picture: much-much more women die of diseases and accidents than actual violence. Even being hurt counts. What is wrong with these people? The saddest part is the first picture, probably a father - son together. He makes his son a loser for life this way, who will never see how he is oppressed and will feel always guilty about stuff he didn't even commit.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:28 PM
-1

Maybe you learned at a different school. We did distinct them very strictly. No need to be an ass about it.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:23 PM
-1

colloquial language See, this is your problem. We talk statistics.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:21 PM
0

but it doesn't mean OP is wrong for calling it average Of course he is wrong. Median and average are two different things. There is nothing to discuss here or call it opinions. They are different things, with different definitions.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:06 PM
6

It wouldn't be sexist if statistics would support that women are victims. But as statistics say that men suffer more violent crimes, it is sexist.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:47 AM
0

I didn't see any extremity in the article. Where is this bending over? Yeah, the whole pretense is sexist, that we need to force girls into IT, because reasons or whatever. But nothing that cannot be justified by enough talk. It's a slimy subject.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:39 AM
3

Maybe usable when you talk about everyday stuff. In statistics they are very different. Average is sensitive to extremes.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:10 AM
1

Nah, there is no point in challenging definitions as part of a debate. Agree on the definitions, and then you can argue about something. Maybe this something is some other word's definition. But if you argue about if being a feminist is a must or not, you better have a definition of feminism accepted by both parties.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:10 PM
11

I hate this word-bending sport. Rape is what we tell you is. Minority is what we tell you is. To hell with dictionaries, right?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:17 PM
1

There you go. Pop songs satisfy a demand. The demand should be killed off, people should stop being nuts.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:04 PM
2

Did i say i think highly of Blurred Lines? I don't remember doing so, and lo, i did not. I talked about taking offense. Should I feel offended by a music i never heard and probably never will, because the lyrics is some bullshit? No thanks, i have more important things to do. Again: this is pop music. Why give a fuck, either way?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:39 PM
3

Now tell me, what else is there to being transgender than your gender being different from your sex? It's the definition of transgender.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:20 PM
1

Nah, transgender doesn't say anything about if you are a woman or a man. in this case it's pretty important. The word you were looking for is: transwoman.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:19 PM
1

Not actually relevant to the thread, but relevant to the subreddit his penis was accidentally destroyed during circumcision Yeah. Lets just call it what it is: MGM.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:06 PM
1

Reminds me of this.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:01 PM
5

Pop music. Why anyone gives a shit? It's the same as being offended by Blurred Lines. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:58 AM
3

The only reasonable thing to do. If someone is a retard, there is nothing to do. If you like them, just avoid the sensitive topics, otherwise break contact.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:53 AM
7

exponentially larger scale What does this even mean. They are values, not functions. What. One out of six American women has been or will be the victim of attempted or completed rape in her lifetime, ... Street harassment and catcalling is by FAR the most common form of sexual violence. Ah, if you measure it that way, than yeah. Rape != sexual violence then, though. And I'm pretty sure 1 in 1 men has been or will be the victim of street harassment. Misogyny hurts everyone. And feminism isn’t jus…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:46 AM
2

I aggree completely with it. That sounds extremely sexist, you know? Yes, we are different, but saying that most women are incapable of rationality is too much. I mean, it's not exclusive to women. Most people are utter retards. Your experiences are bad, because you 1) let it be bad (relationships depend on two, one can only be abusive if the other lets it) 2) search for the bad women.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:01 AM
0

Well, there is that patriarchy , but i guess not much. So down it goes.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:51 PM
2

Why are you downvoted for asking a valid question?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:18 AM
2

When i talked about how female and male sexuality are vastly different, i got boo'd to oblivion. Nice read anyways!
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:15 AM
2

feminist friend See the problem? Okay, this is an exaggeration obviously, NAFALT and all, but if someone's identity is rotating around being a feminist enough to be identified as "the feminist", there are problems.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:46 AM
3

This is what bothers me the most. If I (a man) say something about women: I can never know what it is to be a woman. Also stop talking over women. If a woman says something about women: she has internalized misogyny. If a woman says something about men: she must be right, because she was abused by one. If a man says something about men: stop making feminism being about you!! Double standards everywhere.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:37 AM
5

I'm getting defensive, because you are getting offensive. I can't dismiss you simply as an idiot, because you showed earlier that you can be reasoned with and you are not a total retard. But getting offended by a word? A word that perfectly describes those people i'm talking about? A word that is a common name for those people? What?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:06 PM
5

What is your problem? Did i call you that? No. I did nothing wrong here, don't get offended over nothing. Seriously.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:44 PM
3

And i say it happened, because of the many-many retarded tweets and messages, which were written from a hardcore feminazi pov, blaming a murder spree on the MRM. The mentioned stories about abuse and other stuff were not mentioned, because they don't cause outrage.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:36 PM
14

In my opinion, women do have more to fear, and it's a reality many of us face daily. Nah, it's not reality, it's your perception. Men have more to fear, but they are conditioned not to fear, or at least not show it. Women are less likely to be violated in any field or way. These are the facts. How can you pretend to fight for equality of the sexes when you get so upset that women are voicing their own struggles? The hashtag is annoying because of the tons and tons of idiotic responds. Show me on…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:32 PM
7

People, students, women. Typical usage of words.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:20 PM
34

It's called confirmation bias. The sad thing is, we can't call it that, because it would hurt fee-fees.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:25 PM
1

Ok, we don't have them here, so i have no idea: what is the point of a gender restricted college?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:39 PM
-7

This is not a reason to write it down. I feel that this just proceeds to make mensrights about women as everything else is about women.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:52 AM
-9

Just why wrote this: Female here Why. Not relevant, nobody should care. Think on it.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:43 AM
4

One feminist says that the young girls are not calling themselves feminist, because they didn't experience oppression. Doesn't this mean that feminism reached it's goal and should be left behind as a tool that served it's part and now obsolete?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:31 PM
-6

That's true, if you want to make a statistic. If you want to protect yourself, you will work on a very different basis. Why it's hard to grasp? Not everything is sexist in the world.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:02 PM
-7

Yes, your suspiciousness level increases if you are a male, and that's because most of the violent crimes are committed by males. I don't say she didn't overreact, that all her fears were based on facts. I say that I'm more afraid from males than females (as a male), and there is no sexism in that. So yeah, she cared about your girlfriend's safety, and that is a good thing! She was quite incapacitated as you tell it, we just have to hope she would have been so considerate if both of you were men…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:42 PM
-60

It's nice that she cared but to imply that all men have ulterior motives is the height of prejudice. This didn't happen, she just wasn't sure you are trustworthy, for whatever reasons. Don't see sexism where there is none.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:53 PM
4

This. Downvote because it doesnt belong here. You can criticize the case, which King did not do. Calling people names is not an acceptable way of arguing.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:50 PM
2

The problem is when they call such things study, while having no scientific aim at all.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:06 PM
0

Wanted to ask the same question, but i guess OP wants to show this to feminist "science" doers?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:40 AM
10

Fuck this woman. She is so dogmatic, when she had that talk with Thunderfoot, it was so obvious that she is not bright actually.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:26 AM
3

That is what bothers me. First: I get extremely angry when I come across articles that insist there are gender differences that extend beyond physiology. Then she writes an article about differences between men and women. It's like, what the fuck, how can you be that stupid?
/r/MensRights17/05/14 09:09 AM
3

So why is this not an np link?
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:35 AM
1

men and men and women and women are just as different as men and women See, this is where you are wrong. You will find two men who are more different from each other than a man and a woman who you found. But if you select randomly, you will find that the same gender pairings are more alike than the different gender ones. Obviously depending on what you compare them in, but sexuality is typically one of these points. Men usually don't want to have sex, don't get aroused when stressed. But that ha…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:31 AM
1

So you say it's not true for you, therefore it's not true for the majority of women? And I don't see how is it damaging or how is it a myth. There is no shame in the fact that men and women are different. Yes, emotions are important. But they are not tied tight to arousal in most men. Why would you erase this truth and pretend it's a bad thing?
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:24 AM
1

I never said ALL men have something. We have 7 billion people on Earth, 3.5 of each gender, we will have all combinations of... well, everything. To name some examples of traits: 3D vision for men, verbal skills for women. Typically they are better at them, but as i mentioned before, when you have so many specimen, you will see all kind of extremes. Back to sexuality, men usually use imagination and visual stimulation more, female arousal is more based on actual emotional state.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:07 PM
1

The fact that everyone has their own taste doesn't mean that there are no traits peculiar to one gender.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:33 PM
-1

Female and male sexuality is vastly different, and gays and lesbians are no different. I would dare say heterosexuality as a concept is only valid when we talk about men, as women find things arousing that are not tied to actual gender. But I may be wrong, it's just my imagination and extrapolation.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:28 AM
1

We talk about systematic oppression. There is no man strong enough to throw off a military. many of them died fighting for their freedom, their families, their livelihood, their land You mean the nobility's freedom, the nobility's families, the nobility's livelihood and the nobility's land.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:30 PM
1

Being forced to go to war sounds pretty oppressive to me, by your definition. Either way, oppression is not a short term thing. Being hurt in extraordinary times has nothing to do with oppression.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:24 PM
4

It's not about politicians. I wouldn't be able to live together with someone much less intelligent than me. By making the leap that because most politicians are are male therefore every male should suffer she disqualifies herself from being taken seriously in any and all questions, ever.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:18 AM
2

Most of history's wars over land included the raping and pillaging of other villages. What the actual fuck are you talking about? You just pulled a Hillary Clinton, I hope you see that. Women are oppressed because they are hurt in wars, disregarding all the men who actually die in those same wars.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:12 AM
3

Oppressive? Women had less rights and therefore less responsibilities. These are always in balance, except for the power holders.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:11 AM
2

Uppity broads have no implication that those people are bad because of their womanhood (also because they were not all women). It doesn't tell anything about women as a gender. Therefore the term is not sexist.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:30 PM
2

How is that term sexist? Really, people don't have any clue on the meaning of words these days.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:54 PM
1

Try to read jenny's post history.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:14 PM
0

However, these inequalities are not comparable to what women experience. This is where i sighed, knowing that this was linked here because of it's stupidity. Then the wage gap. Then this gem: I personally believe that by enforcing women’s empowerment, we would also be mitigating some of the gender inequality males experience. Then the bullshit about women in CS, disregarding the fact the "programming" in 1967 was a vastly different thing than what it is now. The comment section is nice though.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:50 PM
1

The screencapped thread's OP was another guy who argued really well, he got this "beautiful" answer from leafitiger. So that reply came to a very good comment not written by Baydude. Can't find the thread but he opened one here on mensrights about it (he was deleted pretty fast from the feminisms topic).
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:25 AM
1

This is not that OP. That was another guy. That guy was very well argued and polite while firm. It's not that i don't agree with OP, though he made some fairly basic rhetoric errors. It's that his style will not win him or mensrights anything. The way he phrased his comment it will only provoke a ban and insults, and no thought.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:22 PM
1

See, this is a reasonable response, not like the other two. OP used bad reasoning, the fact that both sides have issues doesn't warrant a men's rights movements (or a feminist movement for that). The fact that both genders have very valid, very serious issues on the other hand...
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:43 PM
-1

Yeah, but they won't know it, because the guy comes off as an imbecile. "I know i provoke a ban here with my comment that goes against the norm (whatever shitty norm that may be), but you are bad people for banning me brrrrplplaslkdlj" Provoking a ban and then be on a high horse when you get one is not a grown up thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:34 PM
1

This was a beautiful comeback, if it happened. Grat!
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:26 AM
1

This is pure butthurtness, from your side as well. This is not how you argue with people, and adding that last part about bans is just childish.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:23 AM
1

Obviously I can only guess. But either way, it's definitely not a men's rights issue, the would have held back any mother who tried to get into a burning house as well.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:42 AM
1

See, now you are bargaining. Is it worth dieing for your son with no hope of saving him?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:56 AM
2

There are worse things than living in a feminist dominated world, but you still would like to avoid it, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:27 AM
-2

Fact 1: men are more likely to be victims of violent attacks. Fact 2: people like to be vigilantes when police is not a strong force. TracyMorganFreeman says: the topic is important because it happened to men and no one cares. I say: no one cared because it's in Brazil, and it happens there every fucking day. The man was hurt not because he was a man, or because feminism. He was hurt because people are primitive mob creatures. If a woman does something wrong, she gets punished too. It has nothin…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:56 PM
-7

No one gives a shit when it happens in fucking BRAZIL.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:31 PM
3

Hey, don't compare feminists to white people ok? Not all whites are bad!
/r/MensRights11/05/14 03:39 PM
-10

This has nothing to do with mensrights. Mobs are mobs everywhere, even in my country (fairly developed, first world) we have a dozen murders out of vigilantism because of some primitive people. It happens, it's not directed at men (although men are usually the victims, as with all violent crimes).
/r/MensRights11/05/14 03:38 PM
0

I downvoted because fuck any person who tries to tell me or even imply it how to be a man.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:27 PM
1

I'm sure she knows this, just as any intelligent person. The problem is the use of the language. She did say all areas (without saying all, obviously), it's implied in the sentence women are just as capable if not more so.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:51 AM
2

Hmm, the thing is, if you say that women are just as capable as men if not more so in some dimensions, you say that women are better than men. Women are NOT as capable as men in some areas. Fact. Accept it, talk about it, drive feminists crazy, and when everyone can calmly accept the differences between genders, then we can start to be happy about equality. Not as long as we have to pretend that women are better.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:37 AM
3

the transit officers reacted quickly and appropriately Appropriate as in cuffing the man and supporting the woman?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:11 AM
0

That's the thing. Attacking a person for something and disarm his arguments with the same thing are very much different. I didn't hear this in the video.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:49 PM
0

Care to give a timers? I watched the whole thing, but didn't noticed this.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:32 PM
1

There is no such spoiler, so stop trying to be witty.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:02 PM
-1

Why is it important that it's not a white person? I'm curious, does it have some significance i'm missing out on?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:23 AM
-5

Meh. Girl with frilly style talking the wrong things. Yes, it's bad to judge people based on their skin color or gender (called racism or sexism, respectively), but the problem with CYP is that it's plain and old ad hominem.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:20 AM
2

Women online, and especially women in gaming, have it very, very tough in ways that men absolutely do not understand. This isn’t an argument for the community to have, it’s a fact. What the fuck is he talking about. Otherwise, just the usualy GURRL GMRRR thing, nothing special here. I'm all for female only groups if they want, though if i would be female i would never want to be part of such, but why not allow it? The thing is, how would this be a safe space? Separated by rules from the others? …
/r/MensRights07/05/14 09:36 AM
3

So how did a 3 years old get out?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:41 AM
1

Repost, from the front page. Please.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:36 AM
6

My question is, if it already happened, why did you leave any door open?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 09:33 AM
1

I think most of the people on the internet are pro choice, because 1) they are more city folks 2) not only US on the internet.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:22 PM
3

Well, glue is a very good material to stop bleeding, but doesn't substitute for sewing.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:37 PM
2

LONG LIVE THE MATRIARCHY!!!
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:32 PM
1

So many people don't understand this. Generalization is the way people think, everyone. It's called induction, and logically not a defensible way, but works. You just have to know how it works and not apply to a specific element of the group.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:48 AM
11

This is a joke. Why can't you realize this?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:22 PM
1

Never forget to add "in the US". More lucky parts of the world see MGM as something unnatural as well, though not as abhorrent as FGM.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:08 AM
2

Well yeah, women are better as long as there are men. After that...
/r/MensRights30/04/14 05:16 PM
3

So most of them don't want feminism, cause you know, we already reached that.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:58 PM
1

Assuming a patriarchal society benefits most men. Assuming we live in a patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 11:56 AM
4

Twenty years ago, this would have been a boring, obvious thing to say, like feed your baby rice cereal before bananas, or don’t smoke while pregnant. So if something is obvious, it must be true? Like that the Earth is the middle of the universe, right? Her reasoning is much like the reasoning behind vaccines: if enough people are vaccinated, there won't be an epidemic. But it's just not true, check any western European country, where people live similarly to the US, but have their foreskins, and…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:31 AM
6

Probably because you dad is living in denial about his own cut dick. Your mother knows nothing about it, but protects your dad's feelings.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:12 AM
2

I have no experience in this way about other countries, but i would strongly think that people not living in the mediterranean zones shower daily. We are culturally similar in this weather zone think.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:10 AM
3

They do actually, the anus itself does not however.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:07 AM
40

Now THIS is rape culture.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:44 AM
1

You don't get it, right? Have you watched Game of Thrones? You are like Tyrion and Joffrey. You just can't shut your mouth and endure, you have to make a snarky remark. Your pride can't take it, you have to make a passive aggressive gesture. And you are punished for it. Is it fair? No. Is it how the world works? Yes, very much. It's like talking back to the officer who wants to screw you up. You will get a ticket, probably with a higher fine than you would have got if you just shut your mouth.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 07:47 AM
6

Full of shit. If I am trash-talked or verbally berated while playing online, it will not be because I am male nor will my gender be invoked as an insult. So who the fuck cares? Harass is harass, no matter the subject. Or more pointedly, the harassment is topic-neutral, it's aim is not to talk about the topic, it's just a tool.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:48 PM
3

That's a great indicator, though not an absolute one. There are interesting talks around here. For my answer: we need to reach post scarcity economy, and the ability to change our bodies at will, and everything will be fine.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:30 PM
4

Sexual dimorphism.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:25 PM
0

There is a difference between simply ignoring and ignoring and making a scene of it. The first works, but your pride may suffer. The second one provokes the response you got, and is a passive aggressive douche move.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:17 PM
1

Why repost something from the front page of the subreddit?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:14 PM
2

The thing i don't get, distracting boys is not equal with being afraid of boys. If it's distracting, because too much nudity, because it's out of place, because whatever it's bad. But it doesn't imply anything to be afraid of.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:07 AM
2

She surrendered rather than having to go through all of that and end up surrendering anyway. Why would she surrender anyway? Because she wasn't consistent. If someone is nagging you to give you $500, you say no. Even after the 10th time, right? So if you DO give him/her the money, is it his/her fault? He was emotionally abusive and manipulative and it doesn't matter what gender you are. That's a very good point, it doesn't matter what gender you are. But also irrelevant. Yes, he was abusive, but…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:56 AM
5

You wrote a bullshit long comment to negate and dismiss my experiences and to mansplain what rape is. This i beautiful. My experiences > all the studies out there, so stfu! How can people be this deluded?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:30 AM
4

Pressure someone and forcing yourself on someone is two very different things. She set boundaries which she didn't hold. That is actually a very bad teaching behavior, it's similar to when children start to scream for something, and if they scream enough, they get what they want. Just reinforces the bad behavior. And no, I didn't compare men to children, I pulled a simple and obvious analogy from somewhere that can be applied to any fairly intelligent being (around mammals).
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:29 AM
6

Yes it is. Coerced consent where the alternative is not murder or a beating but an ARGUMENT is consent. People coerce other people all the time in all things. This is perfectly natural and OK. You try to get your will to other people, yes, women and feminists too. Your responsibility in this is only to stay in certain boundaries. She wasn't threatened. If she thinks this is not a behavior she can accept, have that argument, if nothing changes, break up. There is no force used here. She CHOSE to …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:27 AM
-1

Just a small reminder, that kilo is lower k.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:39 AM
3

Wanted to make an excuse on his part, that being national socialist is not necessarily an evil thing, but then checked his history too, and it paints the picture of a rebelling 15 years old boy. Bah, whatever. On the point: it's interesting, I would have fucked the shit out of that girl when i was 17, probably, but I don't go and assume the same of others. Stupid people.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:53 AM
11

This is so fucking disgusting. As an experiment, it's interesting, how people react to crimes. That is a very good thing to know, for yourself. I was happy to find out that I react well when two strangers start to fight (I jumped in and pulled them apart), I was unhappy to find out how I reacted when a guy possibly had a heart attack and I let myself hushed away by him and did not call the ambulance or at least call in to the station guards to watch out for the guy. These were live situations, b…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:37 AM
3

Well, this kind of content would look better at tumblrinaction, you don't take tumblr seriously (I hope).
/r/MensRights23/04/14 11:38 AM
13

Did she get alimony? Asking for it is one thing, but shouldn't it only be a right if you actually need it?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:04 AM
1

Thats the point. If you are asked the question: "what do you think about feminism?" And you answer: "I dont." That implies that you don't think about feminism. Which is a very witty comeback, but not true. Do you understand now what i wrote earlier?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:20 AM
1

Soooo you think anyone who is in this subreddit does not think of feminism fairly regularly?
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:15 PM
-1

i don't. Best. I don't approve of this post, but this is a perfect answer. Sadly it's not true.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 04:48 PM
6

Where is the man-hate?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:48 PM
0

I see now why people put /s after being sarcastic. There are people who won't get it, no matter how obvious you are.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:55 PM
6

because they had suffered at the hands of men for so long. It's not only stupidly false, but is no cause for anything. Feeling guilt for the doing of your ancestors is irrational, but making others feel guilt for it is simply evil and selfish.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:53 PM
0

for every baby girl who suffers FGM, the law should demand the castration of a senior member of the family concerned. Yeah, because they are the same. Castration is not on level with removing the ovaries (removing the ability to make babies and kicking the hormones), but on level with cutting a sensitive part which has no impact on sperm or egg production whatsoever. What an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:50 PM
1

The fact that Europe uses the internet too may skew your statistics. We have a much higher ratio of white people than the US.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:45 PM
2

How to respond? I just ask about their whetstones, as their edges are really fine.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:13 PM
-5

Da fuq. Is this real? These things actually happen? I can't believe it, I don't want to believe it. How dare anyone touch my fucking food? Fucking bullies. The sad thing is, if you beat up your bully, it will stop. But you can't beat up these and they know it.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:57 PM
6

See, this is exactly what I meant by annoying. You don't act civilized, you act like an offended child, on the brink of throwing a fit. Calling someone a bitch is never okay. Never. There is no room for interpretation there. It's excusable sometimes, but the fact that it has to be excused says it all.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:24 PM
0

I didn't say you have to act perfectly every time. Just don't judge others if they criticize your erroneous ways. Yes, Sweden is crazy as hell. That's no news sadly.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:17 PM
8

Don't be so fucking condescending. Calling other people names is not an appropriate response, no matter what. You seem like an annoying person (who are you to interrupt two people arguing over something?), and that probably showed through you. Yes, some bitches are crazy, but that is no reason to be a douche.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:05 PM
71

The end is perfect: Sorry dudes, feminism is, in the end, about women, and they make the rules. There goes your "equality".
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:37 PM
3

Yeah, i saw where my comment could be confusing, so made an edit to be clear. Everything is fine here, where we live, not fine elsewhere. No problems, my bad (at least partially).
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:50 AM
2

The paper also states that studies show circumcision has no adverse effect on sexual function, sensitivity, or pleasure. Sure. Cutting out a million nerve ending has no effect on sensitivity whatsoever.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:32 AM
4

So you agree with me?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:28 AM
3

Yeah, and whoever calls themselves equity feminist and still lingering around in the western world is a liar, and you know it. We reached it, end of story. Go and free the muslim girls, they need you.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:44 AM
-1

I suggest that the two things are perpendicular, and while usually don't go together, there is no direct exclusion.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:56 PM
-1

And so how is this about feminism and equality? We knew feminism is a hate group, but what does this have to do with equality? CosmicKeys had a problem with the title of the thread, not the video itself.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:46 AM
4

Actually yeah. When you said feminist, i was like ok, many women feel they are feminists, it doesn't mean anything. But this level of feminism is definitely on the 'too much' side.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:28 PM
5

Or if you have to iterate orally, you just stand up, say "List of ways women are oppressed by western society:" take a big breath, hold for a second "end of list."
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:20 PM
4

This. Even if you know it's bullshit, that is the task. You have to do it, so you do it. If you don't feel creative just give in an empty list, it's an honest answer. If you feel creative, try to provoke thoughts.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:19 PM
3

It's hate speech according to some commenters. Lawl.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:04 AM
12

The best part is, they don't say that, they just imply. If you take what they wrote literally, it's quite correct.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:58 AM
6

Internet == publicity. Many people read what you write, without any notice. You change the public speech by (shocking, i know) speaking in public. If you let them spout nonsense without a reply, people will know that to be the truth (truth is what everyone thinks to be the truth, that's how we work).
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:58 AM
1

Off, but huffingtonpost always kills my browser, makes it into a slug. Otherwise, campaign. Don't believe anything a politician says, especially before elections.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 01:32 PM
1

There was that video about pickpocketing with different genders, that was quite interesting. This is nothing.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:24 PM
3

Awareness, prevention, risk reduction and avoidance? What a fucking rape culture we live in??
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:54 PM
1

Excluding women from Reclaim the Night marches in order to include men is an anti-feminist position, but it is one that women are pushed into making because excluding men is somehow seen as unkind. I was laughing at this SO much. Yes, she writes it down, and then fails horribly to understand what she wrote. She just wrote down why anti-feminism is the only worthy step in this question. Because that's just and that is equality. She wants to say she hates anything that is not beneficial to women (…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:38 PM
-1

Ok, yeah, in an anonymous community like your typical imageboard, shunning the stating that you are female and "tits or gtfo" makes sense. How is this relevant to the mensrights subreddit?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:43 AM
1

Yeah, i soaked it. I searched for the perfect word in English, and in the end forgot to include it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:38 AM
2

Also, if you don't dress in too revealing clothes and don't drink yourself unconscious, you might miss out on some inner journey in vomit—but might also avoid getting raped. rape apologist victim blaming patriarchy
/r/MensRights19/03/14 10:19 AM
3

I know that, and really thinking hard if it's worth 5 minutes of my life. I think i can imagine her bullshit pretty well without listening to it. But maybe it can be considered entertainment?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:46 AM
8

Women are like bread. After a couple of days they get dry, so you them in eggjuice and fry them. Wait, what?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, we have the power with our language. But can you fight other people's language? Is it worth the effort? I communicate the way i want, and try to be a worthy person to mimic, to get your communication and thinking routines from. But i'm not sure if it's worth your time to try and fight what people share on a social site.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:39 PM
4

Ok, where is point 9?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:21 PM
1

Yeah, from my non-representative experiences, about half (a little less, 3 of 8) of the women like the look of a circumcised penis, and the others don't. I guess in the US it's a bit more in favor of it, but there is no basis to say it's nicer.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:21 PM
4

Well, last time i checked, respect was earned, not given freely. See, i can post meaningless shit too.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 01:22 PM
1

Seriously, with her relatively thin frame (we don't see any good angles), HOW can she support those racks? Dang.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:02 PM
11

People are full of shit, men are portrayed as uncivilized bums everywhere. Good luck fighting against it.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:47 AM
3

They are not a minority. They are many. To the family's standard, they are doing nothing extraordinary. I don't see it as a problem, and even if i would, that is the reality. The girl is not alone, not a hurt child, just a normal young person, among millions.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 06:05 PM
5

Wait, you think a 13 year old that tries to act like an adult is some kind of a special thing?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:34 PM
-3

The conclusion? Age of consent should be 14, maximum. And then you can relax the other rules, so simply having sex with minors is still a crime, but you can weight in circumstances much-much easier.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:19 PM
0

And the law should protect the people, and if the letter of the law is against the spirit of it, the latter should win (one letter difference, but how much it feels!). No harm was done, the girl won't be broken from THIS encounter. She would be harmed if she was a "normal" girl, virgin, tricked into sex, but this is not the case.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:17 PM
1

So this is me, trying to tell the world that if you’re a decent person, you’re a feminist. Umm, thanks, but no thanks. Feminism isn’t me refusing to wear a bra, or dresses, or makeup, or heels. Feminism isn’t me saying that all men are reinforcing patriarchy and hegemony simply by being men. Maybe for YOU it's not. But when people do that and identify as feminist, and the majority of feminists just stay silent or passively like it, reblog it, share it, it becomes feminism. If you have a wide mov…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:31 PM
3

Yeah, i got to number 1, and can't find the other 6. Well, my loss i guess, but the whole website doesn't look too... serious to me.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:15 PM
2

At first, as women do, I internalized the problem Yeah, because only women do that. Especially a girl who whines about rejection-shy geeks who do not approach her. Yeah.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:46 PM
3

Starts ok-ish, but quickly becomes total bullshit. Whatever, goes to the trash.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:28 PM
4

You forgot to mention that you were cut withtin a systematic effort to cut little boys. Systematic means a lot here.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 10:52 AM
-7

It is sad when you realize your relative lacks the capability to set up a coherent thought process. But life is tough, suck it up, are you a man or not? dont hurt me pls
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:34 PM
2

When i see or use this word i always have a smug smile on my face, because i know it does not mean what people think it means. It is simply a name for a social structure where the head of the family is the man. It does not imply anything else. And it was true 50 or 100 years ago. It does not exist in the western world now.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:30 PM
2

Asking if he saw anything suspicious, even in hindsight? Why would this be victim blaming? It's more like, "how to avoid getting into your shit" kind of question. Go back to tumblr, if you only want to label stuff mindlessly.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:00 PM
4

The article says nothing new, but these comments. Argh, god, why people are so fucking stupid (while thinking they are so smart)? The fact that having a child or seeking flexible working hours to raise children permanently lowers one’s earning potential is itself evidence of gender bias. What is this. I would also add, that we need to be much more critical of saying “women chose to work lower paid roles/leave the workforce/abstain from higher level positions”. Inequality is a structural phenomen…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:31 AM
6

Similar happened when a colleague went to China to a client to fix something, and they took his passport until he solved it. Never sent anyone there again.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:18 AM
1

Would say thank you, because half the threads are about the sketch i have no idea about, and no one links it anywhere, like i should know about it. But Hulu says fuck you person out of the US.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:26 PM
-1

Sounds right as you phrase it, but the article is a bit misleading, the phrase "head start" is not a good one i think. It's a gender challenge: who can beat their gender's limits more. This is a nice thing. Should be made obvious, so little novice MRAs don't get offended.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:12 AM
0

If it gave the sense it's possibly because that's literally what he wrote. Still doesn't make it true or a good analogue. Yes, in some raster graphics gray (and every other color) is represented with dots from a limited set of colors put next to each other. Is it generally true? No, not really. Your LCD is perfectly capable of generating gray without generating alternating black and white.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:31 PM
5

This video made me fucking sick. It tried to imply that this is a normal, common thing. Choose your fucking boyfriend carefully and if he hits you, leave. Why is this still a thing? Domestic violence is ugly, but if you portray it like this, you just lose your credibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:39 AM
1

I tried very hard to decide if it's satire or not, but still can't come to a conclusion.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:49 AM
1

Situations DO give skills, to some extent. You are not static from birth, the circumstances form you. If you have to endure X you will be more resistant to X. But you say this too, where you write "or develop". Yeah, developing is the effect of the environment.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:44 AM
5

Not only what you say is totally false, it sucks as an analogue too. Good job, you can be a feminist one day!
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:41 AM
4

The interesting thing is, the article mentions only two behaviors: the Queen Bee (where the female frowns on any competition and actively tries to thrust down other females) and the 'sisterhood', which would be women helping each other. The first is simply being a cunt, the second is plain discrimination by sex, that is, sexism. The third option would be simply act like any man would act, and don't give a fuck about the gender of the colleague.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:50 AM
2

It was dumb as fuck, why are you upset? The only thing jiggles my jimmies is that women get discriminated positively on this day, by my own fucking company. They get free beauty and wellness services (in work time). And most of all, for this they block the company showers and dressing rooms. I hope many people come with bikes and will smell all day.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:04 PM
1

I don't know if you were serious or sarcastic, but it's actually true. Feminism tries to kill freedom in almost any form, so if you practice it, you actually go against feminism. Sad. Though the BG picture set is a good point: those female characters look feminine without being slutty, so it can be done. The problem, it's not done. Is it a problem? It is not a problem, at least for me. If people want to show barely dressed chicks, let them! If people want to show chicks in realistic armor, let t…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 11:32 AM
1

Sadly, you can't. I mean you can, but those are exactly the people you have to convince. Not all, but the not radical ones, who sucked up all this bullshit about a secret society controlling and oppressing women AND men.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:04 PM
1

Great opportunity to wear heels in public if you have the kink for it. Why is this posted in mensrights?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:38 AM
3

or a Guy Fawkes mask doesn't hurt anyone. Well, it hurts the wearer's reputation as most "anonimoose" ppl do it with a face and facebook profile. Kinda beats the purpose.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:14 AM
0

Thats what i said, they are NOT punished yet. Is that hard to understand? They are suspended until investigations close, and they are not punished until they are found guilty, so they don't lose money.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:19 PM
-1

No, they are not punished without being found guilty. That is a huge difference.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:54 PM
1

I'm a red pillar. Don't erase me!
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:48 PM
3

What this guy says. Gender is irrelevant if the child is small enough.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:36 AM
1

No, I'm sure there is a perfect system. A system I have no idea about. If you always create justice, people will know what to expect, and can't have complaints.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:47 PM
2

Why all men? Why not all human beings than? I don't agree with being in shame for something i did not commit, but if i am, than all the women should be too, they bear the same responsibility in this as I.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:30 PM
2

Thanks Obama?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:23 PM
13

“If the father is sexually aroused and you the mum is not there, his only option will be his daughter, the only other female in the house," he said. All my fucks.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:22 PM
-10

Jew.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:38 AM
5

I just work by justice, eye for an eye. Obviously a girl usually hits with much less force, but the intent is what's important! Usually men don't want to kill each other, on the other hand, girls are nasty. On a serious note, women usually don't hit me, and if they tried, it's easy to restraint them. The situation is not symmetrical. If a woman can hurt me, i have no problem handling her as a man (or: general human being).
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:34 AM
3

Hah, from half of the vid, the girl looks positively sick, like she will throw up any time now. I guess the actress wanted to portray dismay or something, but didn't really succeed. Yeah, great message, if you drink, you become a helpless sack of meat and everyone else's responsibility to protect you from what exactly? Because yeah, when you go party with friends, you watch out for each other. But if a big girl wants to fuck someone, just let them fuck.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 10:02 AM
17

While i agree with everything you wrote here, i can't go away without words. The ending message of the feminist, finishing with patriarchy and oppression... even if it was not productive and pointless, damn if it wasn't satisfying. That blabbering of the buzzwords...
/r/MensRights25/02/14 09:42 AM
8

If they apply rules with no regard to gender, it's fine, only the irony of realizing it only at their own cost...
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:40 AM
7

It's not that I expect help, it's just the harshness of it all I find a bit surprising. So you actually expect help. The thing is, help should be handed out on a need to basis, not a gendered one. If a woman can lift her own bag, we should let her. If a person is not able, for whatever reason (being a weakling, a child, too short or with only one hand, really whatever), the able people will help. Well, except if feminism made them scared, that is.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:11 AM
1

So we are back to that "everything is possible" against "yes, but not everything is likely". Yes, it is possible. But if one partner does not enjoy something, they won't do it that much. If you want different things in bed, consistently, you are not really compatible. Thankfully for society, most men are ok to be top most of the time, and most women are ok to be bottom most of the time. The ones who have problem are the ones in the minorities.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:50 AM
-1

Yeah, but females do it in a much more subtle way. Luring the prey and tweaking the competitors, not outright aggression.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:04 AM
-4

Well, at least mine is true :) No, really, think it through. In human society, males are in constant contest to get females. To get pregnant you have to do nothing. To impregnate someone, you have to be an assertive, aggressive one. That means you will want to be on top. Now, our society changed things, but old habits die hard.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 10:41 PM
0

Equality as in we are not equal, we don't have equal sexual desires.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 10:38 PM
0

Politics? What? Where?
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:29 PM
-2

Everything in biology says males are the active ones.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:27 PM
0

I don't think modern society really expects genders to act out a certain way in the bedroom. Yes, society doesn't care about your bedroom. Who cares is your partner. Good luck finding a woman who is acceptable in every other way AND belongs to your kind of sexual minority. Lets face it, women who are ok to be on top in a significant amount are rare. Communication can only go for a certain distance.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:23 PM
33

The difference is, being on your back is considered natural for women, and being on top is considered your duty. That is the fucked up thing, but whatever, you have to live with your biology. Just don't pretend we are equals. We have equal rights, but we are not equal.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:52 PM
2

Obviously there is a context to consider here. Blacks were generally discriminated against in the past. Women are generally not discriminated against presently. There is no regulation in the LCS regarding the participants' gender, and obviously most viewers would be happy to have girls playing, that is the whole point of female only leagues. So to answer the original question: i assumed that there is no exclusion, because everything points to that, and from that i concluded that there is no bias…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:08 AM
1

How do you have a bias against something that is not present?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:59 AM
2

Oh, now i defend assholes? Nice strawman.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:42 PM
2

Basically the gaming community needs to grow up up. One of the worst communities surrounding any hobby in the world. Every other community surrounding something competitive is shit. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:19 PM
0

So you say football fans are not rude and are all mature?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:10 PM
1

I was thinking about how exactly is this men's rights, but then realized the immense emotional pressure even i endure to show myself strong, the expectations i get from people, even those who shouldn't make the demands.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:09 PM
4

But it doesn't. His point stands: videogames, and the related industry does not handicap by gender. I would be happy for the girl who got into a LoL pro team or get consistent good results in SC2 (Scarlet doesn't count for obvious reasons). Everyone would be happy for her. There is no actual or subtle bias against women in esports, there cannot be because there are no women in (big) esports.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:47 PM
4

And when people do find out they move to being insulted because they are female ontop of just generally being insulted. That's bullshit. If they are targeted by gender, they won't get the same insults as men. Not on top of, but instead of.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:42 PM
0

I have no idea how these things are tested, but from a personal point of view, the foreskin is the best place ever. You can easily cum just from stimulating that, especially if it happens with a tongue (and of course the visuals help too). I would be a very sad panda without it.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:54 AM
2

But that is plain false. I mean, even if we accept the bullshit that prejudice has to be accompanied with power, women DO have power. Just as not all men are in powerful position, some women are in those positions. It's not about gender, it's about the individual. There is no secret male society.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:45 AM
2

It's not about men and women. It's about a place that is dominated by one kind of people (who happen to be men mostly, but not any men, but a specific kind). If you go there, you blend in or get thrown out. Not the newcomer dictates the rules. It's the same treatment for women and men, it's just that if it happens to females someone will cry discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:48 PM
1

Most points are shaky, but 10 is spot on. I try to tell every girl who complains about this that men do it all the fucking time to each other. We call each other pussy, fag, crybaby, cunt, whatever. If it's not ok for you, get out. Simple. You adapt to the place, not the place adapts to you.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:29 PM
2

But nice, crackless, spotless, pure diamonds ARE rare enough... diamonds that can cut we create cheap in the industry. Thankfully, we have no such tradition here, rings are usually there, but the fabric is whatever, i saw beautiful wooden rings, gold is most common though. With or without stone.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:52 PM
7

Okay, but it's not the victim's gender is what's important but the aggressor's. So you can get the bald scalp as a man too if you are attacked by a woman.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:17 PM
1

And they are a minority between programmers.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:14 PM
2

And you try to imply that in other industries it's not the case? Because i call bullshit on this. Yes, there are lazy, uninterested people everywhere, so what? They can do some jobs too, they will get employed, they will be your colleagues.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:45 AM
1

So you say there is no in between. Someone devotes all his time to his hobby, or he is just a lazy slouch. Welcome to the real world, where real people exist. We are spread over a continuous spectrum, some people do more programming, some people do less. None talked about the best programmers, we only talked about programmers. If you want your field to be something special, not just a job, go to research. In the industry, efficiency always beats your need to feel special, and that's exactly why …
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:43 AM
2

The definition of hacker is not an exact one, so probably you think of something else than me, but here is one: hacker is someone who is extraordinarily good at something, usually technical, devotes significant time to tinker with the field. To be a programmer, you need neither. Programming is just a job. There are enthusiastic people in other fields, and there are less frenzied ones.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:40 AM
-2

That is fine, i just said you don't have to be a genius to program, you don't have to devote your life to it. I see a great many programmers who are perfectly normal and functional social creatures with perfectly normal lives, interests and so on. They may not be the best programmers, but they do the job regardless. To be a programmer, to be in tech you don't need to be a geek or a hacker.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 01:36 PM
10

I don't like the preposition that to be a geek you have to take apart stuff from an early age and if you are not the weirdo kid in the class you are not a real geek. Women are much more present in tech in countries like India, where it's not a pride thing, but an opportunity to earn good money. If you want to act like "hacking" is a special thing that you have to be born to, you are gravely mistaken.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:38 AM
3

I'm not sure it's worth the fuss. You would sure to be reported for threatening people, and they have witnesses to sway the story, you only have one fragile video recorder.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 10:31 AM
0

I seriously hope it was in a sarcasm tag.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:43 AM
4

This is what fucked up my mind as well. Why is this even a consideration? Why is this brought up in the article? What the fuck is wrong with people?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:42 AM
1

So your point is? Women are overrepresented in some places, men in others. I said nothing else, don't try to see into it anything, just refuted the Coke company's article.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:01 AM
6

they are under-represented anywhere you look, whether it’s politics, business, non-profit, you name it. Ok, just to name a few: teaching, medical fields, social workers, general office jobs, stay-at-home parenting. Fuck you, Coca Cola. Ok, i get it, it's for PR, but still. Fuck society that you can get points to Gryffindor by stating stupid shit like this.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:06 PM
27

That's what i wanted to say. Saying that i have obligations just because i was born with a penis is extremely sexist.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:49 AM
1

I totally agree with you, but i don't think they get enough PR out of it. But it's their decision, just let none say it's not discrimination, and we are good.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:34 AM
4

Yeah, but they should hire people who have the qualities they seek, not hire women. If women have these qualities in the majority, than naturally women will fill the places. It's this simple. Explicitly searching for women is plain old discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:51 AM
4

But in the real one you can torture animals who disobey and maintain a network of spies and coerced animals who report on each other. Would be marvelous. Pigs are cheeky, sheep are... sheep, bunnies are jumpy etc.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 11:45 AM
-7

This man is very bad at picking women and fights. Awesome writing, i could very well place myself in the happenings, even though i can't really relate. I was never told to leave a woman being right even though she is not, so i never did humiliate myself for this reason (there were other opportunities for that).
/r/MensRights30/01/14 10:11 AM
39

The funny part is, in a "debate" in my country about female quotas (organized by one of the "green" and "liberal" parties (these words have a very bad connotation here)) it was mentioned by both supporters on stage (a man and a woman), that how better a 100% female parliament would be. After arguing that no one represents women in the lawmaking, and how that's unfair. What the fuck, why do i expect logic from these people? One of the arguments were that the guy's grandmother said so wise things …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:50 PM
5

I see this at home. I work at a full job, doing 42-45 hours a week, and help at home some. Girlfriend works a half-job, and that's not every day, some weeks only 3 or 4 days. Still, we do the housework at a half approximately, and she doesn't even understand what is my problem with it. It's her lifestyle that makes it look equal, she gets home earlier, drooling a couple of hours behind the computer, i get home, both do some stuff, and then she gets active and doing some stuff on the computer whi…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:27 AM
1

Well, there must be some pressure on girls when playing against better opponents, as quoted in the article ("Girls particularly underperformed (relative to their skill rating) when playing a male opponent with a higher rating than them"), but the same pressure is on everyone. Everyone. The fact that boys handle it better than girls may be a social thing, might be a biological fact, i don't know. But the mentioned Judit (and the other Polgár sisters) are the proof that ordinary people can be good…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:09 AM
2

Because being gently might work, even if not just, and being blunt will provoke a defensive reaction which is bad.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:10 PM
1

It's like we are in China... you shouldn't get in trouble for helping people. Fuck the idiots who pump gullible people's (C) heads full of shit.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:07 PM
7

He said federal laws.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:00 AM
9

Well, sexism and all the other discriminations are totally natural, thats how mankind survived for so long, by making broad categories so they could make decisions fast with a good accuracy. It's natural, but in these days unnecessary.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:01 PM
1

Oh, you believe in the wage gap. I see why you don't understand me.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:39 AM
1

Why not just hire the better applicant? That is what happening. But better encompasses the risk of leaving the company in shit. The fact is, women are still more prone to leave for a child than men (in my country it's perfectly feasible for the father to stay at home with the baby, but still the majority is women), and a capitalist company has to be based on facts, not ideals to make money.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:20 AM
1

Well, there are professions where males are discriminated against, like stripper or even secretary. But i wouldn't compare women getting pregnant (which is the way of life, and most of them will do, sooner or later) to acting on pedo surges, which is a pretty rare occasion.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:46 AM
2

Yeah, but all is because the PATRIARCHY!!44
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:48 PM
1

But the employer has to make a profit. If you don't discriminate between risky and not risky people, the not risky people will pay the price of it (someone has to pay it, hence the profit). Is it fair to them?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:27 PM
0

Yeah, but what fair means? Equality at the cost of the employer's? How much risk can we put on the employer and still call it fair?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:54 PM
0

Yes, it's a complicated issue. I just wanted to point out that there is no clear answer.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:39 PM
6

As you are forbidden to ask such questions (as: do you intend to have a child in the next 5 years?), you have to rely on generalization. Police is using profiling for crimes committed by one or the other group of people, headhunters use profiling too, why being a woman should be left out of the picture? It is counting.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:52 PM
1

You talked about the situations she describes. I quoted her, when she writes about something much more general than "enabling someone to be lazy, useless, and never have to solve their own problems or pay the price for their own mistakes". She has a problem with the man way of handling complaints, and then brings up anecdotes about something slightly related. This is not correct rhetoric, proving something with unrelated things.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:56 PM
1

But whenever I so much as mentioned a problem, no matter how trivial, their first response was to offer up not encouragement but to solve the problem for me. Because they were “nice” guys. They were attempting to protect me from the possibility of failure, which for me is at the heart of my motivation. Without the possibility of failure, how could I continue my struggle to be a fucking grown up?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 12:14 PM
1

I would add that the justice system should treat women as responsible beings and give them the same sentences for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:39 AM
7

I don't agree with some of it. When you jump in to solve a woman’s problems and valiantly save her from any possibility of failure or discomfort, YOU are patriarchy. Men do this, not to women specifically, but just do. When faced with a problem, we try to solve it. It's not patriarchy, it's just a mindset. If you bring up a problem, you probably want some help with it. Women usually don't want help, but they don't state this in advance, and many men just don't know it.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:58 AM
3

No, funny how people look for excuses when they don't get something.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:20 AM
2

A natural person that commits rape.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 07:46 AM
1

Arguing with feminists on social media: not even once.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:17 PM
-1

Yeah, you have no idea what you are missing out on. The foreskin is a wonderful place to have stimulated.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:13 PM
1

The lack of surprise or upset about this makes me a bit depressed. We just accept that this is true, which is perfectly normal. Why women can't accept that some other things are not about them?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 10:20 AM
8

It looks like a parody, satire to me though. This line makes it pretty obvious: Important side note: I’m trans. I’m a genderqueer person who doesn’t identify as a woman or a man, and my presentation is pretty gender fluid. He was not only being sexist, he was also misgendering me and erasing my identity in front of all my friends and other people in the bar. You literally can't be sexist to someone without a gender/sex.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:52 AM
4

Hah. Came to say this. Never heard of them, never will listen to them, and reading their comments about rape culture, i didn't lose much, in fact, only some annoyance.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:48 AM
20

This will just fuck over women who want donated sperm... i just can't see how feminists don't see it.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:26 AM
1

IF the object of the blackmail is something nasty in your past. If they kidnap one of your relatives, than you are totally innocent.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:52 PM
0

First lets examine your view. Can you think of any crime where i can be faulty when i'm a victim at the same time?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:29 PM
-2

I didn't say EVERY time. I said sometimes. Yes, there are crimes committed against people who can't prepare against them only with extraordinary effort. But there are other kinds too, and saying you are NEVER at fault is just as false as saying it's always your fault. Sometimes you are at a fault for a certain ratio.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:52 PM
-9

I don't know if i agree with this "its not your fault" thing. Sometimes it is, partially. If your car gets stolen because you were careless, whose fault is it? But if you are faulty in your rap, so what? It was an incident on your part, you were not careful. You shouldn't feel guilt, you didn't betray anyone.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:02 PM
1

Human beings are just Earth's way of getting a bit warmer (cuz she/he is cold). And plastic, don't forget plastic.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:49 PM
0

The decision to have (unsafe) sex was his though.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 10:04 AM
2

If love the sudden dramatic level drop of your allegories. Or socks are serious business?
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:53 AM
3

Well, maybe Nicky rapes people, than I agree, he should stop. I never did and probably never will rape someone, so I feel this thing shouldn't concern me and so I can talk about rape. Yay! Ok, read the article and Nicky is a full-fledged idiot. He quotes the guy who says perfectly reasonably things, and replies to them with retard, biased opinions which he tries to state as facts. He seems like the type of person who thinks it’s okay for men to act irresponsibly while they’re drunk, but expects …
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:34 AM
1

Came here to reply the same. No point in arguing with irrational people.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:19 PM
3

Hungary. Age of consent is 14 here, so the question itself comes up pretty rarely, but i would strongly believe that i can't be charged for touching a twelve year old's breast if it's not against her will, but i'm not sure as it never happens, it would be wrong. With this 18 years things get pretty weird.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:00 PM
4

I thought the age of consent is only relevant when we talk about actual sex. Weird countries you guys live in.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:00 PM
2

This pic describes it pretty accurately. He is fucking dedicated.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:19 AM
3

Wait, why is it a crime to feel up someone?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:58 AM
1

Because mothers are the head-of-household in contemporary American society And considering our society should be patriarchical...
/r/MensRights17/01/14 08:37 AM
1

Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:08 AM
1

No, not without practice, without working out. We had a rod in the apartment, so i could and did pullups whenever i walked under it when i was young. I miss it so much. I would say the average desk jobber can't do 3, but someone with physical training should be able to.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:00 PM
3

For people who are required to perform heavy physical stuff? Yeah, really.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:50 PM
1

My average chick can't do a single push up. Does that matter? Not really. We talk about marine wannabes, after an intensive bootcamp.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:13 PM
0

This is pure bullshit. I mean, yeah, we use women's bodies to advertise. Does this mean anything? Maybe. But probably nothing like what Laci tried to imply as a consequence. Men are objectified? Yes. Is it wrong? Hell no, who cares? They got paid for their roles, they probably made some woman's heart beat faster, good for them.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:53 PM
8

Dunno. 3 pullups don't sound much, when i wasn't fat i did 5-6 without any working out. Why can't somebody whose job is to be physically and mentally strong do that?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:39 PM
9

You shouldn't assume they are women. There are retards in every gender, and feminist propaganda is strong.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 11:26 AM
1

Now yes. I saw some map of the world here recently, and GB and some other smaller countries were the "recently went out of fashion" category.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:11 PM
1

Western world - you mean the US. The other western countries were never big on circumcision, except maybe GB? Europe in general does not support this shit.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:47 PM
1

It's so obvious, i can't even comprehend what are you guys think.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:22 AM
0

Than you shouldn't call them fat. Offending people just for the sake of offending is mental masturbating.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:32 PM
0

See this
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:16 AM
2

The problem I have with OP's poster is that it's basically saying "it's OK to not respect [females] if you know a few [females] who are assholes." So, you answer to someone's perfectly rational explanation why the misunderstanding happened, and then proceed to ignore it and interpret the post in your own one sided way. Good job. Dullahan, you rock.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 10:14 AM
-1

That's not true. If i take it as a joke, i will stay on good terms with you later (if i were in good terms before).
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:37 AM
2

Should be like: "Don't call any person fat who you are not sure will take it as a joke." Why do we differentiate between the genders? Oh, i know, because females are allowed to show low self esteem.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 07:31 PM
-4

Well, 1.9 is smaller 1.10. 1.1.0 would be a different case. There is no sense writing 1.05, he probably meant 1.0.5. I don't see what this has to do with decimal system, versioning is some numbers (in decimal, but thats not really the point) separated by points.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:41 AM
17

Well. She is obviously white, and from her text she obviously doesn't have those problems muslim or African (hell, even Asian) women have. I always think about this picture, and it gives me a good grasp on what is feminism today, and what it should be. Probably she thought about this kind of feminism too.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:31 PM
-4

No, the post is about western feminism.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:56 PM
1

Best example of the feminist contradiction. She says it's for equality, and then proves it's not. You can't go for equality by solving one part's problems. If you would solve every difference of one part (both good and bad), that would be fine, but i guess no feminist would say that "yes, women have this better, lest make it worse!".
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:53 AM
14

And that's exactly what feminism should fight for. But why do you bring it up here?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:39 AM
0

Care to explain? I can't imagine why a parent would benefit from the boy being cut. Not thinking is sadly common tho, but it happens in every part of life.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:08 PM
3

Sue who? Your parents? They thought it would be to your benefit. The hospital? They just go along standard procedure. You have to change people's minds: don't mutilate your children. It's like teaching not to rape, but with actual sense.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:01 AM
15

That would be awesome. I'm pretty bear sized, hairy, with normal male voice. I can just imagine the hilarity when someone calls me out, probably some middle aged woman and i tell her "I'm a woman" in my deepest voice.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:39 AM
-1

I just... what the fuck did i read really. This girl is retarded or what? The probability is that MY son (if i ever have one) will never be a rapist, but my DAUGHTER might be raped with more chance (as she may be attacked by any rapist). Gah. I can't.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:42 PM
1

But than he would be all negative...
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:18 PM
18

She has to take your absolute value to make you real.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:50 PM
7

This. Love when people realize the error in their ways. I always say i don't have moral problems with hitting women. I hit a woman for the same thing i hit a man. Thankfully i didn't have to do neither so far.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:49 PM
7

I feel for you guys, thankfully it's not practiced in Europe. Those who lost their foreskin don't know what they are missing out.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:21 PM
2

Honestly, i just cant believe this is really happening. Fucking absurd. Sincerely, from Central Europe.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:20 PM
1

Are you a retard on purpose or its a birth deformation? Really. No one told women only care about money. That would be a conscious decision, and most people, including women don't do that. Its just how society works.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter