| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What's up with the post-makeout ignoring?Maybe they're just not that keen on you or they regret it. | /r/seduction | 19/09/15 01:12 PM |
| 1 | Girls taking a long time to respondIf she's not responding quickly without valid reason she's just not that into you. | /r/seduction | 07/04/15 11:08 PM |
| 2 | Don't let women know that you are learning from the PUA community.After going to a male friends house and seeing the game I have to say my opinion of him changed and not exactly in a positive way. I know I'll get hated on for this, but when I talk about the cult of PUAs and teaching seduction techniques/this style of self improvement to other girls it's never seen as much more than sleazy & something to avoid. That's my experience. If I was learning how to pick up men by diligently reading reddit I'd be ashamed if the guy found out. | /r/seduction | 24/02/15 08:45 PM |
| 2 | Long-time friend, hooked up recently but makes out with guy in front of me... How to proceed?She's just not interested in you, move on. | /r/askTRP | 07/02/15 01:55 AM |
| -2 | She’s bluffing.Wat? Have you met many women? | /r/TheRedPill | 08/06/14 12:15 AM |
| -11 | She’s bluffing.Preach! | /r/TheRedPill | 08/06/14 12:14 AM |
| 4 | doesn't get much more absurd than this, fellas.whether this is a troll post or not it's pretty insulting to both sexes. Christ alive it sounds like they've been beaten around the head with too many journals and dissertations of 3rd/4th/whatever wave feminism. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/13 12:08 AM |
| -1 | doesn't get much more absurd than this, fellas.Doesn't get much more absurd than this. [ftfy] | /r/MensRights | 29/05/13 12:03 AM |
| 1 | I got a vasectomy two years ago in order to have control over my reproductive life. Since then, I enjoy the same freedom and power that women do: The freedom to only have a child when I want to. AMA.I went from Microgynm 30, to depovera and now the IUD and not a single period between them. It only seems to worry my SO not me, he's also worried about what a male pill would do to his fertility. | /r/MensRights | 22/01/11 12:45 PM |
| 3 | I got a vasectomy two years ago in order to have control over my reproductive life. Since then, I enjoy the same freedom and power that women do: The freedom to only have a child when I want to. AMA.It's a Smörgåsbord of womb altering delights. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 11:55 PM |
| 1 | I got a vasectomy two years ago in order to have control over my reproductive life. Since then, I enjoy the same freedom and power that women do: The freedom to only have a child when I want to. AMA.My boyfriend is far more worried about my fertility than I am mainly because I've been on birth control since I was 15. He has never known me to have a period (chose to not have them, it's freakin' brilliant) so I supose that could be a reason for his concern. I'd like to hear about some women's stories about enquiring about sterilization in comparison. I understand a doctors questioning but I can't imagine being told no. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 11:54 PM |
| 3 | I got a vasectomy two years ago in order to have control over my reproductive life. Since then, I enjoy the same freedom and power that women do: The freedom to only have a child when I want to. AMA.Not every /2x-er is the same. I find it deeply unfair the attitudes some people have towards men's rights regarding reproductive power. It's no equality if men aren't getting a fair say in their own reproductive life. When hearing news/gossip mag articles (not exactly academic but is at least a small anecdotal 'evidence') about girls continuing pregnancies or secretly trying to get pregnant even after the heartfelt plees from the father to do otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 04:20 PM |
| 3 | I got a vasectomy two years ago in order to have control over my reproductive life. Since then, I enjoy the same freedom and power that women do: The freedom to only have a child when I want to. AMA.I've tried several birth control methods and found that now with the IUD it's just the easiest most convenient thing I've tried, I won't have to worry about pregnancy for the next 10 years. On the other hand it feels like you've been punched in the womb after you get it done, if anyone's SO is considering it, I'd recommend it if you're not too squimish or too much of a wuss. My boyf said he would be very apprehensive about taking the male pill if/when it became available, which was a little disa… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/11 04:06 PM |
| 2 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.you were going to get an upvote until 'are what churches and women do'. I don't tar your sex all with the same brush please don't mine. Uncool. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 04:34 AM |
| 0 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.If the someone rapes someone it's wrong yes. This issue was a legal and moral one, I'm trying to say that the legality or illegality of a rape is crazy, rape in ANY circumstance should be illegal. Don't you agree? | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 03:48 AM |
| 0 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.it doesn't matter about whether the law said that after someone signs a marriage licence that they agree to consent to sex at any time no matter what the feelings of the other individual. A law like that I feel is morally unjust. If someone (including married, single, young or old) has been in a situation where they do not want to have sex with someone there should not be a law protecting a rapist from prosecution, how ever old that law is. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 03:14 AM |
| 0 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.sorry I missed out a word 'and the moral judgements of those people who get the abortions would doubtfully NOT change because of the imposition of a new law' The point I was trying to make I suppose is that, I see no reason why people should be prosecuted for having consensual sex with someone who through a change of law becomes 'under age', if it is consensual on both parts I see no moral problem over the basic age of 16(but I suppose it may be a different story when a legal age starts at somet… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 02:32 AM |
| 6 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.What is wrong with you? O.O | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 01:49 AM |
| 1 | A 79-year-old man can be prosecuted for allegedly raping his wife almost 50 years ago even though it wasn't a crime in 1963.When you mention the points about under-age sex and abortion you are discussing things that are acted on with consent and the moral judgements of those people who get abortions would doubtfully change because of the imposition of a new law. Why should there be a limit to this? if someone is raped, it is exactly that and no amount of time absolves the act. It is odd to see that it has taken so long for the issue to come to court. But no rape conviction should be brushed aside because it would inc… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/11 01:47 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter