| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | "Military service requirement for presidency = sexism" -r/feminismIt is not. Mandatory military service for both genders is the most realistic basis for the position of president, who is usually the highest military position in the country. Your statement would ring true if militaries and wars haven't been the path humankind had to go through to obtain free societies. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/20 05:54 AM |
| 2 | The reason feminism is so destructiveThe fact that sociology studies have a terrible replication track record in comparison to the hard sciences that they try to refute. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/20 01:27 AM |
| 1 | The reason feminism is so destructiveThe reason a large part of the nature vs nurture debate bears no fruit is because of this. People arguing empirical sciences vs sociology theories which aren't sound even by their own metrics. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/20 11:53 AM |
| 1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)And no I never claimed it was emperically studied. absolutely linked to an increased suicide rate. I guess 'absolutely' means something else once the comments get more than 3. Still waiting for that link though. And again you are arguing things no one has stated. what you've said, and misinformation is rife in this area And like I said. Irony. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 10:00 AM |
| 1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)What specific point are you looking for hard data on? The first comment you claimed has been empirically studied which you are now claiming is hard to study. You keep mixing factual data and trying to corelate it to your some weak theories which is rather boring. You are now even arguing points no one made so can you just point to that data to your first comment. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 09:43 AM |
| 1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)This comes back to my statement that factors involved in psychology, social sciences are difficult to empirically study by their very nature. Weird how they numerically study literally everything every other cause apart from your theory then at that point they become difficult to study. Why do men commit successful suicide at a higher rate? You mean like being more prone to risk taking behaviours, more lethal methods, more likely to look for a final solution etc. All those things that have been … | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 09:16 AM |
| 1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)Your first article has no data on the effect of anything you have claimed to suicide rate. Infact it has shown data and numbers for everything it has stated from employment to divorce to illness except on the theory you claimed. Because for someone who claims to be passionate about such issues you throw in baseless theories with empirically studied phenomena just muddies your statements. And ofcourse developing countries have a majority of cases they have 75% of the worlds population. That is wh… | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 08:19 AM |
| 1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)but its not the hotspot, most suicide takes place in to middle income countries, No. Suicide 'rate' is highest in upper middle income countries to high income countries. That is the western world. Which is what I hve stated. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate extensively studied that sex as an independent risk factor for suicide. Where have I stated this.None of my statements have anything about the suicide disparity by gender. And please post that link that shows … | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 07:11 AM |
| -1 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)absolutely linked to an increased suicide rate. Climate has a more robust and concretely studied effect on suicide rate than what you have claimed. The western world has a more comprehensive support system but is still the hotspot for suicides. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 04:59 AM |
| 57 | Humor mixed in with truth? Good points the middle section throws me off a bit. (Discussion)The vast majority of suicides aren't anything about feelings not being heard. They are related to consequential realities that they see have no solveable route like unemployment. You could talk all day about how you feel and that wouldn't eliminate the pressure from having no job or losing your kids to a divorce or a chronic illness. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 01:47 AM |
| 3 | Reddit is now openly admitting that it will allow promoting hate against "groups who are in the majority" (So, like women?)Yet every media you have pointed out is still in existence today. People moaned and whined for sure but their whines were background noise that didn't affect the product itself. You want to try to say the same about the media right now? How many things have been revamped or removed just within the first month. The whining might not have changed but the effect certainly has. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 01:42 AM |
| 1 | Scottish gov just published a Statutory Guidance on gender representation, 100% female representation is acceptable but 51%+ male representation is discrimination. Equality of outcome achieved.That is literally the same as every International NGO. Whether its the GDI, GII or Gender Gap by WEF or UN. Any advantage women have over men is calculated as equality. And most of those measures are then used in other areas such HDI. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Gender_Gap_Report The report measures women's disadvantage compared to men, and is not a measure of equality of the gender gap. Gender imbalances to the advantage of women do not affect the score. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/20 10:25 AM |
| 4 | 70% of missing indigenous people in Canada are boys/men... $350 million inquiry is only for women?? Huh? & in the report feminists say it wolud be "a grave mistake to include boys and men" in the inquiry. Meanwhile UN policies are formed to ONLY feed women. Feminism has no place in egalatarianismhttps://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/tradition-authenticity-and-the-fight-for-indigenous-identity-1.3281731/are-we-ignoring-missing-and-murdered-indigenous-men-1.3284322 https://nationalpost.com/opinion/adam-jones-aboriginal-men-are-murdered-and-missing-far-more-than-aboriginal-women-a-proper-inquiry-would-explore-both The man who wanted boys and men to be added was fired. https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/missing-indigenous-womens-inquiry-adds-men-and-boys | /r/MensRights | 05/06/20 04:59 AM |
| 4 | Democrats Add Anti-White Male Identity Politics legislation in the Economic Stimulus BillHow do taxes work right now then? The progressive scale has the input from income tax as top 10 pay 70% 50-90= 27% and bottom 50> 3%. The bottom 50 in US is roughly people making 40k a year. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/20 03:14 AM |
| 2 | Democrats Add Anti-White Male Identity Politics legislation in the Economic Stimulus BillThere isn't a single test of UBI that has been done on people earning 60k a year and below. The Ontario one was 25k and the Finnish one was done on the unemployed. How will they come out even when they aren't recipients? Unless I am missing a study? And thats not even the finer details. Will UBI eliminate welfare and other social programs or be an added system. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/20 02:30 AM |
| 1 | Democrats Add Anti-White Male Identity Politics legislation in the Economic Stimulus BillNo. It means the middle class also gets taxed more in comparison to either of the classes. The rich are already taxed more and the poor are already exempted. To fix that deficit in a progressive scale you have to tilt the slide even more, that means a large chunk of the middle class will get hit with a higher rate. Shit gets expensive whether or not exceptions are added. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/20 01:39 AM |
| 1 | Found this in r/funny commentsDo you genuinely believe sanitizing this sub will stop the demonization. As long as you aren't saying what they want to hear you will always be in opposite camps. You are trying to create a scenario that pleases literally no one. And this notion that you cannot be critical of a position without it being a direct attack/ bashing is cringe shit. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/19 04:39 AM |
| 17 | Because your degree matters more to women then your personality apparently.Wasn't there a recent study that disproved this. https://www.psypost.org/2019/08/men-on-tinder-do-not-appear-to-be-intimidated-by-highly-educated-women-according-to-new-research-54187 | /r/MensRights | 11/10/19 04:33 AM |
| 8 | Death by Police is Now the 6th Leading Cause of Death Among Young Menhttps://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2015/all-males/index.htm Its not sixth not even in the top ten causes of studied deaths. https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/07/30/1821204116 Even by the study itself it is not stated as sixth. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/19 12:02 AM |
| 33 | No such thing as sexism and racism against white men.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers%3fcontext=amp And when it comes to inter-racial homicides. Black people kill white people at double the rate than vice-versa. Whatever this woman is on, not even statistics can help. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/19 03:17 AM |
| 18 | 'Traditional masculinity' deemed harmful, could lead to sexual harassment, medical group says“Traditional masculinity ideology has been shown to limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict and negatively influence mental health and physical health,” the report warns. The “masculinity ideology” is defined by the APA as “a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, r… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/19 01:43 PM |
| 10 | The US Senate has voted to confirm President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court - BBC NewsNo, it won't. The same people who claim the emotional toll of recanting their side of story mocked the guy for his emotional outbursts. You can claim how its not an action fit for a judge but then forget that is an actual person with things he holds dear. For them, this is a blemish that needs to be eradicated and they will just double down as they have with every other issue. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/18 10:16 PM |
| 25 | Anyone else notice that most of the news today on the Youtube shooting is in the form of criticizing Youtube’s ‘demonetization’ practice.Its pretty easy to see how this has broken the gun debate. You can be anti-gun (Im in the middle)and i would have no issue but its clear to see how the gun narrative at the moment isn't about gun safety. Piggybacking on the emotional angle of children was to ignore facts and criticism. Nothing those teenagers can say now is able to be critiqued without it being an adult cyber-bullying a child. -It has proven that the gun is just a tool. The perpetrator even with a gun didn't pull a massacre just… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/18 07:02 PM |
| 123 | While the shooter at YouTube today was found to be a woman, I urge you to not use this tragedy as an opportunity to score points for the MRM, it will only make MRA's look like bad.Its so far beyond an "Us v Them" Issue. Its at the same levels as "Good v Evil", "Oppressor v Oppressed". According to sources, ADL,Vice and the likes ,this place is a Hate-speech group. You can claim whatever facts you want and you will be dismissed as a rabid MRA or incel. This post isn't a blip on the other side's radar. They sure as hell will find a 0 karma comment to include in their next hit-piece but all the normal posts here will never be a screen-cap in their editorials. Trying to claim… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/18 11:25 PM |
| 5 | Why are people not talking about toxic femininity as much as they are with toxic masculinity? Why do they even refuse to acknowledge that it exists?Because using broad-brush terms on nuanced scenarios isn't something we should also want to take part in. There is nothing like toxic masculinity the same way there is nothing like toxic femininity. Humans are different and experience life in different models. Claiming being a masculine man is bad for all men is not smart. The same way being overly effeminate is not bad for all women. That term is used to condemn being forced into stereotypes while doing what it claims to be fighting against. Ju… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/18 12:09 AM |
| 3 | Why does it have to be mens rights or women's rights?Have you heard of the gender suicide paradox. It is where women contemplate and attempt suicide 2-4 times higher than males. While males die from suicide 3-4 times higher than females in the Western world. Female attempts are at times attributed as a sign for call for help. This is not about emotions and no study had been able to co-relate how men handle emotions and their suicide rate. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/18 03:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter