TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shlomotrutta Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by shlomotrutta on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

They will probably get cushiony air-conditioned desk jobs (...) For ex. israel. This is hardly accurate, nor is it fair. Women do serve in combat roles in the IDF, e.g. in batallions along the Jordan border. They do not get into physically demanding roles because the IDF does not lower standards to fulfill quotas. Women actually want into such roles but will only be allowed so if they fulfill the demands.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:46 PM
1

(Frederick) did consider Mdm. Pompadour his actual opponent. While Frederick was well aware of the Pompadour's great influence over the King, that was what she had: influence. Other than Maria Theresa, who had effectively sidelined her husband, Emperor Francis I, and certainly unlike Tsarina Elisabeth, Pompadour had to go through the King. Thus she chose the Abbot of Bernis with only with the king's approval. Richelieu even was the King's own decision - as was, in the end, joining the coalition …
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:50 PM
1

that the coalition of European powers that fought Frederick the Great were all ruled by women This claim does not even fail to work if you claim that France at the time was not ruled by Louis XV but by Jeanne-Antoinette Poisson, Marquise de Pompadour. You would have to completely overlook Elector Friedrich August I. (August II. of Poland) as well as of King Adolph Frederick of Sweden.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:15 AM
1

Was it Frederick the Great? I think that the dude was at least bi. I don't think that the evidence of any homosexual relationship he might have had is rather weak: About Peter Karl Christoph von Keith, Hans Hermann von Katte and Michael Gabriel Fredersdorf, who are often paraded as his homosexual lovers by that strange gaywashing cottage industry, there is zero proof and not even a hint of them having been more than rare friends to the isolated Frederick. Moreover, if we believe despite lack of …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 10:26 AM
3

Hi, those were but examples of infant boys killed by circumcision. For the US, the number of boys killed every year through this procedure is estimated to be above 100.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:53 AM
6

Circumcising infant boys carries a non-negligible risk of permanent damage an even death, see here, here and here, while providing no medical benefit. Either all parents are prevented from needlessly endangering their children or none are, religion providing no rational argument for an exception.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:27 AM
6

What are you trying to tell me?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:51 AM
6

Not only is the loss of over half of the nerve endings and the removal of the protective foreskin a problem; baby boys die as a result of having their foreskin removed. Circumcision-related mortality rates are estimated to be at 9 per 100,000, or about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. The boy in this case was lucky.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:44 AM
27

It was not the father making the decision. The parents made a deal: the father would have the children carry his name, the mother would have them have her religion - and thus, she would have all sons circumcised. And it's not "the Religion" choosing us, we choose our religion. I cannot oppose male circumcision for certain private reasons. For professional reasons, I would object against it: Even if rare, still too many infants boys die or carry permanent damage from the procedure.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:34 AM
48

I find your assertion that male-dominated work teams cannot have a "productive, creative, efficient and sustainable" to be presposterous; particularly in light of the fact that women seem to preferentially bully each other at the workplace, which is why female-only companies often don't work out.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 06:59 AM
1

These systems aren't bad for everyone involved. They are great for the administartors, who advance their careers by pushing such "progressive" projects.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:06 AM
1

It has been made legal as per Art 141(1),(4) EC and EC Council Directive 2006/54 Art 3. These explicitly allow discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:43 AM
5

Sports in their current state should be a meritocracy, we don’t need anymore participation trophies Then let's take the female soccer professionals by their word: Make them play with and against men, make all soccer leagues and tournaments mixed, and see how much they earn then.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 06:13 AM
3

the war against tourism rages on.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/19 09:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter