| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | All women that said "no uterus, no opinion" and are now begging for mens support on abortion can go shove it.Wrong. He said outside the mother. Puppies and newborns are outside their mothers and can live without their mothers. Someone else is capable of taking care of them if the mother dies. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Roe vs Wade has been Overturned; If we truly believe in Human Rights, we must support a Women’s Right to ChooseNo because newborns ARE sustainable without their mother. But you knew I said that. Fetus' that are aborted are not. Again, people in a coma are in a completely, not even comparable situation. Already explained why. Anything else you need me to dispel? | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 09:48 AM |
| 1 | Roe vs Wade has been Overturned; If we truly believe in Human Rights, we must support a Women’s Right to ChooseUh yes. Not conscious fetus' means there is no life, no one to experience loss of life, and no previous ownership of life. Pair that with the inability to sustain itself without living within the mother then you have something that is completely ok to be scrapped. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Roe vs Wade has been Overturned; If we truly believe in Human Rights, we must support a Women’s Right to ChooseYou can take a baby animal away from its mom and care for it yourself. It's life sustenance isn't directly attached to the mother. A clump of a few cells is directly attached to the mother. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 06:56 AM |
| 0 | Roe vs Wade has been Overturned; If we truly believe in Human Rights, we must support a Women’s Right to ChooseNo, it's your argument that doesn't hold up unfortunately. Your scenario is very easy to dispel. A person in a coma had consciousness. They had a life, and there is a chance they come back to said life. You would be taking that life away from them. A fetus didn't previously have consciousness, there is no life they lived, no life to be taken. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 06:24 AM |
| -2 | Roe vs Wade has been Overturned; If we truly believe in Human Rights, we must support a Women’s Right to ChooseEasy distinction. He is conscious and is living on his own. A fetus is neither conscious nor living on its own. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 09:13 PM |
| 17 | Somehow doubt many women lost fingers in factories to make a livingOh so just run of the mill evil then... lovely. | /r/MensRights | 31/05/22 07:33 AM |
| 7 | Somehow doubt many women lost fingers in factories to make a livingThat's crazy, why was the front door locked!? | /r/MensRights | 31/05/22 07:26 AM |
| 4 | Elon Musk walks away from the Democratic Party and one day later he gets hit with a sexual misconduct allegation. What a fascinating coincidence.This is truly retarded. You have your nose so deep in his ass that you can't see he literally swapped to frame it as a political event to rally brain deads like you to his side. He might be guilty, she might be lying, he might have paid her for no reason (although thats dumb since, if he didn't do it, it means anyone he's ever spent 1 on 1 time with could threaten him and he'd pay) but it's certainly nothing to do with politics. "The left" isnt a sentient being hellbent on taking over the world,… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 09:10 PM |
| 3 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?So once again you have ignored me and made the same claim. What benefits do you get that will only apply to babies? You haven't provided one reason as to why circumcision benefits babies only. Why have you ignored once again that people in Europe do not circumcise and their penis' are fine? What kindve mental gymnastics are you doing to conclude that NOT genitally mutilating a child is cruel? The kid will remember FOREVER because the negative effects (loss of sensation, loss of important physica… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 10:39 PM |
| 3 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?Hilarious. "Propaganda". Anyone who is om the side of baby mutilation is on the wrong side of history. It is "mutilation" when an adult chooses to get it done, but it's not morally wrong to get it done willingly as an adult, so the negative connotation isnt necessary. Saying it was ok in the past as proof it should always be ok is stupid. Slavery was "ok" for a very long time. Doesn't mean it's right. Where's the misinformation? Point out specifically what I said which is misinformation, don't d… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 10:14 PM |
| 3 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?"an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal" sorry to break it to you but it is by definition mutilation. I understand you take offense but you are looking at it wrong. The aren't natural men and women who are calling you mutilated as an insult for not having foreskin. These are fellow circumcised men(like you) who are describing the procedure as brutally honest as possible to make others understand how horrific it is, as to g… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 08:45 PM |
| 3 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?Uh, what exactly is it that you think circumcision does? what "benefit" is exclusive to babies? Bare in mind, Europe as a continent doesn't circumcise like the US and they are living just fine. So make your claim very carefully. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 08:17 PM |
| 2 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?So brainwashed you can't even see it. Have you considered that the child isn't going to make the decision AS A CHILD? That maybe, just maybe, the whole point is to let them CHOOSE when they reach adulthood? The decision is not necessary as a baby, anymore then parents deciding what tattoos you are going to get because "as a baby you can't decide". | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 04:11 PM |
| 5 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?Cutting off the clitoral hood is anatomically the same as cutting off the foreskin. It also prevents smegma buildup and reduces the risk of cancer(the same two stupid arguments used for pro circumcision). Would you be ok with me cutting off babies clitoral hoods? The girl won't remember it, it looks better, there are rarely any problems that arise from it, and boys will mostly prefer cut(yes, let's start mutilating babies at the youngest age to model them for sexual attraction, very reasonable. … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 04:07 PM |
| 5 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?This is false. Many American women are circumcising their children, and many make comments using the same incorrect information as men who support it. I know plenty of feminists who are pro circumcision | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 04:01 PM |
| 13 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?You are a good person. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 03:59 PM |
| 5 | Why don't baby boys have "my foreskin, my choice"?an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal. It comes under the definition. It's not an insult, it's validation of the pain they feel. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/22 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Mass circumcision event.They absolutely can be wrong, you are right. It just hurts to see this practice continue. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 04:31 AM |
| 4 | Mass circumcision event.Ok. Just try and use empathy, for just a second. You are happy being cut. I am not. If they instead let us choose when we got older, you would still end up happily cut, and I would remain happy with a natural penis. If they cut us as babies, I get fucked over for no reason. Btw cutting your genitals to appease women isn't great, and women in Europe are the opposite, so it's a learned behaviour. Also you are missing out on one of the most sensitive parts of your penis, less sensation. It'd be lik… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:44 AM |
| 1 | Mass circumcision event.It is a men's rights issue. Where was my right to bodily integrity when this was performed? | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:40 AM |
| 1 | Mass circumcision event.I don't think you are hearing yourself. You say leave those who want to cut theirs off. The baby isn't CHOOSING to cut its foreskin off, that's the problem. They literally cannot choose to "enjoy their foreskin" because the parents chose to mutilate them. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:39 AM |
| 2 | Mass circumcision event.Pro genital mutilation, doesn't understand basic science. No surprise. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:37 AM |
| 2 | Mass circumcision event.Think. Hard. All Jewish men are supposed to be circumcised, but not all circumcised people are Jewish. Not anti Semitic as it's not a Jewish only practice. Try again. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:36 AM |
| 2 | Mass circumcision event.Except it isn't preventing much of anything, just mutilating. Not only are the health benefits spurious or outright lies, but they are also irrelevant. "Reduces transmission of STDs". Cool. Babies don't have sex so there's no reason they can't choose to get the procedure when they are adults. I don't know how dumb you have to be to think that ripping off skin, which is full of nerves and protects the glans, fused to the head of the penis won'thave negative side effects. See Europe as a continent… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:34 AM |
| 3 | Mass circumcision event.If this procedure was done to you as a baby you literally have no point of reference on what it's like to "deal with foreskin" | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:30 AM |
| 4 | Mass circumcision event.The studies behind those claims have literally been debunked, that's why they are refuting it. Besides, the incorrect health benefits claimed are not substantial enough to warrant mutilating babies, the percentage changes are miniscule. giving all girls double mascectomies would help prevent breast cancer, but we don't do that now do we? | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:29 AM |
| 5 | Mass circumcision event.Except it isn't preventing much of anything, just mutilating. Not only are the health benefits spurious or outright lies, but they are also irrelevant. "Reduces transmission of STDs". Cool. Babies don't have sex so there's no reason they can't choose to get the procedure when they are adults. I don't know how dumb you have to be to think that ripping off skin, which is full of nerves and protects the glans, fused to the head of the penis won'thave negative side effects. See Europe as a continent… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 01:26 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter