TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shortmanlongfingers Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by shortmanlongfingers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. n. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts. No, it's pretty factually informed, reasonable, and fair to think that wall street execs have it coming
/r/MensRights31/07/19 06:28 PM
-44

okay but its wallstreet execs in the movie so thats not really a bad thing
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:01 PM
0

nobody cares about manspreading, it's something you see in sjw OWNED compilations on youtube, but in reality there's like two articles from 2016 and no feminists are enraged by men sitting
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:34 PM
0

No addition to the conversation thinks their opinion on social commentary is unique Actually I added a pretty unique side of the issue to the conversation, when I stepped into this thread nobody else was critical of how unfunny, low resolution, and surface level the comic looks. I think that's cool and rad. frequents Donald Trump subs Nothing wrong with that. Not a Trump guy, and not an echo-chamber guy either. Gotta challenge them, and also sometimes let them know that people on the left can be…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:20 AM
1

Caricatures of feminists and what kind of things they do that are goofy aren't facts that would prompt refuting, it's not even an argument or a full narrative. If you think I inadequately addressed the feeling of this comic, I'm open to debating pretty much any feminist issue in depth exchanging facts and sources on discord. I'm not an echo chamber person, and I'm and empiricist.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:15 AM
-12

Low image quality, poor art, unfunny comic ripped from ifunny making level zero social commentary about how feminists are crazy SJWs? Must be r/mensrights
/r/MensRights27/06/19 12:33 AM
2

Not even almost true
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:51 PM
2

it sounds like you're extrapolating your personal experiences to a trend in a multinational movement
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:22 AM
0

Why does the left worship “people of color”? They put them on a pedestal just because they are “people of color” People of color shouldn't be worshiped or put upon a pedestal, but there are specific problems that uniquely affect them and progressives are starting to acknowledge that. Also what a dumb fucking term some faggot made up to not offend anyone cause she was too afraid to say “Mexican person” or “black person” "People of color" is different from "black person" or "mexican person", becau…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 03:20 AM
0

But you're conflating the release of the letter with the time of the accusation. The accusation was made in a letter privately, and at a later time the letter was released by anonymous democrats.
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 12:22 PM
-22

What rape allegation do you have evidence of being politically motivated?
/r/MGTOW24/09/18 06:06 AM
1

i got dumber reading this
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 03:40 PM
1

The last three pictures I've seen on this sub today I had to check whether or not it was r/forwardsfromgrandma
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 08:19 AM
2

Paul Joseph Wattson is among the dumbest people on the internet, considerably a snowflake of the right. Steven Crowder on the other hand, whose watermark is on the image, is pretty intelligent, but extremely dishonest.
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 08:10 AM
1

I'm not effeminate, I just don't like indian sweatshop made memes
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 10:13 PM
-4

this is the shittiest meme I have probably seen in my life
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 07:04 PM
5

A fundamental misunderstanding of the movement and the commonly accepted nomenclature around sexuality is worth removing you from discussion when this misunderstanding is paired with a dogged unwillingness to approach the discussion respectfully. So many of the comments in this thread seem to agree with the thought in the picture because this community has a lot of members with a tenuous grasp on sexuality. Bisexuality is it's own spectrum of people who are sexually attracted to both sexes, to b…
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 06:14 PM
4

most therapists are women and will be actively sabotaging the therapy sessions Can someone explain this a little more in detail?
/r/TheRedPill16/05/18 02:21 AM
17

Having multiple surgical abortions has not been shown to heighten the risk of infertility in a way that isn't common among multiple pregnancies in general, and having multiple medical abortions has never been shown to affect fertility.
/r/MGTOW28/04/18 11:01 AM
1

really bad job of censoring this persons name
/r/MGTOW28/04/18 03:13 AM
3

why is nobody talking about how shitty this meme is
/r/MGTOW16/04/18 05:56 PM
39

two of the top three posts on r/videos are political
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:02 AM
2

But each abortion potentially means that someone who could have been evil in the future has been erased. The person that could have been born isnt any more likely to be helpful to the world than harmful, so citing the fetus' potential value is negated by its potential for harm. And this is operating from the idea that the mother is responsible for the potential of the child they might have had. Not only that, but the decision to not raise the child is made in both contraception and abortion so t…
/r/MGTOW10/03/18 07:17 PM
2

You don't have to cop out on semantics just because you don't have any counterpoints, you can call a fetus' hypothetical nonvalue anything you'd like to indicate value. Asset, article, force of good.
/r/MGTOW10/03/18 07:39 AM
1

Abortions prevent all kinds of people from being born, I don't take the position that abortions are justified by the evil people they might have killed because it's a very weak argument to say that what the fetus might have become is any sort of a commodity that the mother had destroyed by getting the abortion.
/r/MGTOW10/03/18 12:40 AM
1

That's not a study or polling so I must have slam dunked that guess, but if you're arguing whether it's ethical to give women the choice to have sex without intending to have a child, I would say that an action is morally neutral and the onus is on you to show that it is morally wrong
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 05:50 PM
1

But the amount of abortions performed because of rape doesn't indicate any change in use of contraception, frequency of sex, or sexual promiscuity. in the future this person could have been someone great but his/her mother denied that opportunity. So the value of the fetus is the hypothetical adult it could have become? By that logic contraceptive would also mean that a child that could have been someone great was denied the opportunity to be born. Abstinence also denies someone who could have b…
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 05:43 PM
0

Do you have any evidence, study or poll or anything at all to suggest that women think and act like this because of access to abortion? Any peer reviewed research that concludes that women with access to abortions will neglect using contraception and be more promiscuous and careless with sex than women without access to abortions? This bit here is pretty silly too immoral removal of the fetus that's already developed enough to feel pain Your strawman baked in the assumption that a fetus has righ…
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 08:02 AM
0

Abortions cause women to have casual. Sex w chads I'm guessing that there is no study or polling evidence at all pointing to this, and that you just pulled it out of the abstract of your mind?
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 04:46 AM
-2

If you could find a shortcoming in the thoughts behind this judgement of mine you would feel inclined to share, correct?
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 12:13 AM
1

What kind of equivalency is that? I really dont understand the comparison, excuse me if im being thick
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 12:09 AM
0

It doesn't improve the lives of fetal people, but that's not a problem because the life of a fetus doesn't matter
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 07:21 PM
2

Just not wanting a baby is a credible reason
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 07:18 PM
10

they have aborted tens of millions of infants thats is a very weak start to a list of ill doings, abortion access improves peoples lives
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 07:01 PM
2

What if i am gender fluid and i jump in between on the fly?
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 06:35 AM
17

What about DUDES
/r/MGTOW21/11/17 04:07 PM
1

I think the man with the card is more right than the one answering him, and he has much more of a conquering attitude in comparison
/r/MGTOW14/11/17 01:01 AM
1

Deep fried instagram
/r/MGTOW01/11/17 12:47 AM
1

village India confirmed. What is great success over there, ten dollars an hour?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 08:09 PM
248

This is such an obviously made up caricature of entitled women, fake text messages are some of the lowest quality content that gets positive upvotes anywhere on reddit
/r/MGTOW14/10/17 04:34 AM
1

Cleopatra. Joan of Arc. Marie Pasteur. Catherine the Great. Queen Victoria.
/r/MGTOW08/10/17 04:15 AM
-3

i dont think women having the rights that men have is cultural marxism
/r/MGTOW07/10/17 08:10 PM
1

The acronym men growing up their own way means i dont grow up your way by fufilling whatever steps you think are necessicary, i do it my own way, which could have any opinion about self image or women or manhood
/r/MGTOW01/10/17 08:30 AM
1

You take in what you see in the real world through this scope, and then perpetuate your limitation to just that scope returning again and again to a place you wholly agree with. Circlejerk.
/r/MGTOW27/09/17 10:24 AM
1

Someone making an accusation has a responsibility to prove their accusation, because everyone is innocent until proven guilty. This contrasts with a discussion about gender equality, not only because I don't enter the discussion defending an idea but rather attacking one, and also in the way that I did actually make my case. If you found it wanting, you have the freedom to explain why. I think you won't because you can't. Your question about why I am here when the community consensus is against …
/r/MGTOW27/09/17 10:20 AM
1

So you think an incel has a "BP" perspective, and although I am not an incel or bash women, this makes me incel anyway? Huge leap of logic. Now we jump to the justice system's unfair treatment along gendered lines. I never took a side in that, you just made a profile of me and assumed what you'd like. That I'm celibate, or that I don't recognize the way men get the short stick in court. You clearly have no interest in discussion if you only want to frame my argument in a way that makes it easier…
/r/MGTOW27/09/17 10:12 AM
1

An appeal to emotion has no place in discussion on the grounds of reason. Your idea about anecdotes is correct, but of course this case is a horrible example of it. Having had a personal relationship with maximum thirty women, from the scope of someone on this sub, walking into an echo chamber to reaffirm your thoughts, this doesn't build any sort of a case that women all behave the way you might think they do. There's billions of them.
/r/MGTOW27/09/17 09:43 AM
2

a sex robot with a cold death stare is a thousand times creepier than a vibrator
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 04:04 PM
2

Attack the argument, prove your point. You made an accusation that you can't prove, and now you call me immature, stupid, and press me to defend what is established, that executive action isn't unconstitutional. If you think there has been an infliction, the onus is on you to support your accusation. The justice system doesn't run on claims because just accusing someone of something proves nothing, so back up your argument with evidence.
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 03:44 AM
1

Its not my responsibility to show you where executive powers are in the constitution, its your responsibility to show where limits on executive powers are and explain how this stops the president from making executive actions. You are one hundred percent the only person with something to prove, and if you cannot prove it, it is assumed to be wrong, because if we assumed every infraction on a rule was truthful before it was proven, the truth would not matter, and accusation would hold the power o…
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 03:31 AM
0

Innocent until proven guilty, its on you to prove that there has been a violation, not on me.
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 03:16 AM
0

No, if you claim that something is unconstitutional and unlawful the onus is on you to prove your accusation
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 10:53 PM
1

Im just saying, executive orders arent unconstitutional, and if they are you need evidence
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 08:26 PM
-4

There is a program called DACA that lets law abiding, working, educated people stay in our country because they make it better
/r/MGTOW23/09/17 06:06 PM
2

i cant tell if this means this sub has become more or less self aware, since this is satire and all
/r/MGTOW20/09/17 03:05 AM
2

no, this is why a SJW shouldn't be in a scientific field, because this represents an idea, not a sex. There are plenty of women qualified for scientific fields
/r/MGTOW18/09/17 06:07 PM
1

Not only do we not have the full story, but we don't have a reason to think this represents all women. Shouldn't this sub do a better job thinning out all of this anti-women content, and maybe go back to the roots of redefining the journey of manhood?
/r/MGTOW18/09/17 06:00 PM
1

I think the only trait all women share is womanhood, and that they're individuals with free will and personalities
/r/MGTOW17/09/17 07:04 PM
1

It's not bizarre and it does make sense, men did not "do it all", there are plenty of extremely important women in history that have made great accomplishments. The meme is worded horribly actually, since it says women have contributed next to nothing. And if you think my use of the word "merit" is incorrect, google the phrase "on their own merit", words often a different meaning depending on context
/r/MGTOW16/09/17 05:08 PM
1

But you can't, you havent observed all women
/r/MGTOW15/09/17 07:47 PM
3

Which women do this? Do we have stats?
/r/MGTOW15/09/17 04:54 AM
4

No, this meme is literally just bashing women and saying that men have made all great acomplishments, all on their own merit. And it's worded really poorly too. I would consider it punishable just to keep a standard of quality, disregarding how unintelligent the claim it makes is.
/r/MGTOW15/09/17 04:47 AM
5

Very /s
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:59 PM
8

God H A T E S your foreskin, it makes you G A Y
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter