shvedsky Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	If you think that some feminists hate men, why do you think they do?		shvedsky	/r/MensRights	28/02/13 06:24 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
7	Another predictable You Go Girl / Men Suck article in mainstream media explaining decline in marriage I "like" how the article says, "women don't want this, women don't want that" but makes no attempt to question if men want those things, and how come they put up with them for centuries.	/r/MensRights	15/10/14 08:09 PM
1	It is important to know why women leave the IT industry. Men? who cares! Can you take a good natured joke? In other words, you're a bunch of bros who brought what belongs to a party with friends to the workplace. You didn't even change what you say when someone calls you out on it. Hopefully, bystanders will notice that nothing in your post is specific to software engineering, and make a fair conclusion that it's not something inherent. Mexiben my ass. What if I didn't just laugh? What if I called you a bunch of immature pricks you really are?	/r/MensRights	06/10/14 05:06 AM
0	It is important to know why women leave the IT industry. Men? who cares! The culture like this is not everywhere. You are just typical Valley brogrammers, disgrace to our profession.	/r/MensRights	06/10/14 02:32 AM
2	I enjoy creatively written children's books and have been labeled by very overly-concerned females as being a potential pedophile because of this. Discuss. You see, overly concerned females are very protective of their roles. Their identity--and sometimes livehood--rests on a belief that only a Mother is capable of caring for children. Every man who's not acting indifferently in proximity of children or anything childish (including books) is seen as a threat to their identity. Such a man is subconsciously labeled dangerous. Be merciful.	/r/MensRights	30/12/13 02:07 AM
1	Angry student viciously attacks random men in her class, says "hit me f*ing back!" also circulated on the whitesrights forums This is literally Godwin's Law. Please avoid.	/r/MensRights	30/12/13 02:02 AM
2	Feminists angry that welfare no longer focuses 100% on women's needs: "Americans have viewed men as capable of caring for themselves ... women were always viewed as people to be cared for and protected." Just a quick comment: where is a homeless person supposed to cook the sausages they buy at a grocery store? They don't have a stove at home because they don't well... have home.	/r/MensRights	27/12/13 04:44 AM
1	Advice needed, in a tight spot. You insist to continue to insult a person for what could have been (and probably was) a traumatic experience inflicted by others? Great job, sir.	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 06:46 PM
3	Advice needed, in a tight spot. It's very strange that you've mentioned all possible scenarios of what happened with the poster's life except for the obvious: a woman once left him after his finances shattered.	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 06:31 PM
3	Further criticism of Feminism is officially banned on Wikipedia. Yes, my reply reads like this, and your attack on Wikipedia looks like one of the millions of similar attacks by activists on all sorts of issues, including religion, politics, controversial historical figures and events et cetera. I find it extremely valuable that the website successfully resists most of such attacks, and keeps the encyclopedia up to some standard. My reply sounds disingenuous because this is not the first time I see an activist proclaim how corrupt Wikipedia is, and most of th…	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 06:54 AM
1	Radical feminists steal $2,000 worth of calendars Which simply confirms that everyone who's working on Men's Rights Issues is a criminal! \s	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 05:46 AM
37	Further criticism of Feminism is officially banned on Wikipedia. This post has a sensationalist title. Appropriate title: "Further criticism of Feminism is officially banned on a single Wikipedia article named 'Feminism'".	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 05:41 AM
12	Further criticism of Feminism is officially banned on Wikipedia. Wikipedia shouldn't be a battleground for opposing activists, so there's nothing wrong with setting standards. There's nothing wrong with long accounts on history of the movement that doesn't offer any criticism, and there's nothing wrong to offloading criticism to separate page--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-feminism. The reason for such offloading is probably because, unlike, say, Men's Rights Movement page, Feminism page is quite long. Why longer is ok? Because the movement is much older…	/r/MensRights	19/12/13 05:34 AM
9	Student Suspended For One Year and Stripped of Full College Scholarship for Hugging Teacher So which scenario made this sexual assault? Probably the one where he hugs somebody from the back which is usually much more than a friendly hug?	/r/MensRights	16/12/13 06:59 AM
3	Wikipedia censorship at its finest. The conversation was shut down in 52 mins. Are you serious? This article is probably the most exuberant and concise enumeration of MRA causes. Wikipedia rules require to provide both sides on such controversial issues; that's why there are references to research we combat as "misinformation." Apparently, they haven't found anything better than misinformation, so we're good, right?	/r/MensRights	14/12/13 09:43 AM
1	Main programmer leaves project after public shaming for rejecting gendered pronoun changes as trivial. So it looks like despite all the pondering on resignation or termination, this guy is still on the project, and haven't actually resigned. Well, good for him: he didn't crush under such pressure.	/r/MensRights	12/12/13 06:04 PM
1	Main programmer leaves project after public shaming for rejecting gendered pronoun changes as trivial. Care to link to a proof that he or she actually left?	/r/MensRights	12/12/13 04:26 AM
2	Boy with asthma dies at school because he wasn't allowed to keep his inhaler with him. Ontario mom urges schools to let asthmatic kids carry puffers (X-post Canada) Some people of power took away kid's medicine because of a zero-tolerance policy induced by fear of lawsuits. The solution you propose? More lawsuits against them!	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 08:08 AM
1	Mansplaining and its gender-reversed corollary I liked your post and found it very insightful. It's sad to see other commenters focusing on non-important parts. Probably, you could have started with the second half?	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 08:02 AM
1	women aren't the only victims of violence.... [img] Thanks! That's hilarious!	/r/MensRights	07/12/13 08:59 AM
24	women aren't the only victims of violence.... [img] Somebody, please, shop this to say Violence against women happens to men too	/r/MensRights	06/12/13 06:47 PM
-3	"What Happily-Married Women Need to Know About Divorce" - #2 nauseates me She loses 5 years out of 10 (50%), and he loses 5 years out of 30 (17%). This is the female risk. Whether it should be written into the law, and to what extent is a different question; I simply described the risk.	/r/MensRights	05/12/13 09:15 AM
-6	"What Happily-Married Women Need to Know About Divorce" - #2 nauseates me The male party typically has significantly more of that time.	/r/MensRights	05/12/13 05:19 AM
-7	"What Happily-Married Women Need to Know About Divorce" - #2 nauseates me You're not seeing it, huh? Women assume a risk of wasting their youth on being faithful to a wrong man. Sorry for being harsh, but we're all adults here, right?	/r/MensRights	05/12/13 03:44 AM
0	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development I can state that they are wrong as long as /u/yakon or you or somebody else doesn't back up their findings with research similar to the one linked in the OP.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:25 AM
1	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development The point I was making is, one could consider her "creepy" but would not "crazy". There is a difference between these concepts.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 08:22 AM
7	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development You are wrong. To label someone crazy, yiu have to actually know a lot about her character or have a refwrence from someone who did. The "creepy" label, on the other hand doesn't require this.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 05:52 AM
1	Is loneliness a men's issue? I mean, your description of "just doing stuff alone" is kind of gender-neutral. Why you think did OP see more men than women then?	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:21 AM
17	BBC News - "Clare's Law", which enables women to check the police record of a new boyfriend, will be expanded to cover all of England and Wales. Unsurprisingly no mention of the other way. I wouldn't be surprised if your statement was one of the Murphy's laws.	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:20 AM
1	Is loneliness a men's issue? Why is it unfortunate to be sitting alone? How can you explain 9 out of 11?	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 07:10 AM
10	Who put all that sexism in Google's autocomplete? Just so you know, manipulating autocomplete in search engines by spamming them with keywords you want tgem to display is not a novel idea. It has been around for at least several years in SEO and I wouldn't be surpeised if political activists adopted it.	/r/MensRights	31/10/13 02:27 PM
7	Atrocity: Man wrongfully convicted of rape released because prosecution withheld evidence casting significant doubt on accuser's credibility; then, police wrongfully arrest him again in sex offender sweep Why doesn't this man sue for wrongful arrest due to "clerical error"? It seems like the only way to prevent this in the future.	/r/MensRights	30/10/13 02:51 PM