TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sickpharaoh Archive

View 2 posts and 74 comments by sickpharaoh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not the first time she's tried m8
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/16 10:20 AM
1

the truth is woman-hating lol
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/16 10:09 AM
1

P P D P D
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/16 10:09 AM
-1

2GUD4WORDS
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 07:57 PM
5

First of all See And second See
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 07:54 PM
9

That's what being a cunt will do to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 07:31 PM
5

She's nothing without TPB, they don't need her. And she has no credibility after what she did to Ghomeshi.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 07:30 PM
2

Skanks will get naked for a camera for free because they're skanks. Why wouldn't I resent a skank who thinks she's worth $20k a week to do it? Yeah I've jerked it to porn, but I never paid a dime to do it. If I respected porn stars, but never paid, it wouldn't make me any less of a "hypocrite" in your eyes.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 05:39 PM
7

It's a job you shouldn't be defined by your line of work, but your actions Your line of work is part of your actions, dumbfuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 12:22 AM
4

le mom's basement xDD Found the butthurt camwhore.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 12:21 AM
2

Ah, good point.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:42 PM
8

It's not a "Christian idea" you fucking fedoralord, most people have to actually work for money. For most people, sex is something recreational that they do in their spare time and for their own enjoyment. It's not something the average person will ever or should ever view as "work." But I already know you're a cuck just by using the term "sex worker."
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:29 PM
19

The reason most people look down on pornstars is due to the fact that most people actually have to work for less money than one of these cumdumpsters makes, while objectively contributing more to society. I know a girl who's a veterinary assistant and she makes like $12/hr to get peed and shat on and bled on every day by sick animals most people wouldn't know how to care for, after spending years of her life studying biology. You're damn right she deserves more respect than fucking Bree Olson.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:25 PM
9

And then she has the audacity to imply that she's underpaid because she didn't make as much as the producers and doesn't get royalties. What I don't understand is where all this money comes from. Who the fuck pays for porn especially in this day and age?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:19 PM
13

By the way, she still cams on her own time. Sounds like she really regrets her life choices.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:05 PM
5

If you're not retarded it's fairly simple to figure out.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:05 PM
23

It's not a word of caution, she's literally asking to be treated the same as a woman who actually had aspirations in life and thought of something better than sucking dick for money. At one point she says "employers can deny you for any reason and you can't ever work with kids" as if this is somehow wrong, bad, or should be changed. She's crying about how unfair it is when any idiot could've told you this would be the result.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:04 PM
5

It's a few days old, Jizzabucket was late to report on it
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/16 11:17 PM
10

MUH BATTERED WOMYN SYNDROME why is it even called a syndrome, this shouldn't be allowed
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/16 10:10 PM
27

It probably won't be. Women always get off easy even when they're convicted.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/16 08:50 PM
5

B T F O T F O
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/16 12:46 AM
2

W O M E N O M E N A N D N D W O M E N O M E N F I R S T I R S T
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:39 PM
3

I'm sorry you exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:10 PM
3

Did we see the same video, retard? The guy has his hands at his side. You're blind.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 06:10 PM
6

It doesn't matter if that's your point or not because your point is stupid When one side is showing up with the intention of disrupting their opposition's ability to assemble and to hear their chosen candidate speak, and the side being disrupted is not doing that, you don't get to call it an equivalency. If these whiny losers would stop showing up, there'd be no incidents to speak of. Unless you think Trump supporters would violently attack each other for no reason, which you won't be able to pr…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 03:35 AM
17

You're getting downvoted because you keep posting this tired example and ignoring all the documented instances of anti-Trump people disrupting people's freedom of movement and assaulting people because it doesn't fit your fucking narrative. Get fucked.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 03:33 AM
6

It doesn't validate it, but there's nothing to show that there would be violence if people were not showing up to instigate. No one is getting into violence at Bernie or Hillary rallies because no one is showing up to protest ideas they don't agree with, or screaming in people's faces, or putting their hands on people/spitting on people/throwing blows. Stop pretending that none of these "protesters" are behaving violently. Here's an idea: if you don't like what somebody says, don't listen. If yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/16 03:32 AM
1

It's in place in most states. It deems evidence such as social media posts, text messages, voice mails, etc as inadmissible if they concern the alleged victim's sexual history, which is obviously a sticking point in the case of someone like Mattress Girl, who is on the record as repeatedly contacting her alleged rapist for sex and affection after the rape was alleged to have occurred. If that case had ever been credible enough to make it to a criminal court, it's likely that that documentation w…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/16 05:21 AM
2

these practices are in place Not properly, no. Rape shield laws prevent full and proper cross-examination of the plaintiff, which in turn can and does lead to innocent people being imprisoned.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 08:10 PM
2

It's horrible enough that they went through the rape Relying on the assumption that this is actually the case now you're saying that they should feel obligated to go through the additional turmoil of telling and retelling their story That's how it works though. When you accuse someone of committing a crime, you have to provide evidence and actually prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they're guilty. getting accused of being a liar Asking for proof is not accusing someone of lying, it's asking f…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 06:17 PM
2

Someone going through the shame of being victimized doesn't tell everyone who will listen, save for the police. And yes, most of them were confirmed liars, and the ones who weren't confirmed had holes in their stories at the very least. By contrast, every actual victim I've known only confided in their most trusted friends and took steps to handle the situation properly. Like any other crime, there is at least some responsibility on the victim to report it to the right people.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 04:23 PM
2

My legitimate reason for not believing someone who's telling me that is that they should be telling the police, a doctor, or a lawyer instead of me. Avoiding someone who can actually do something about it and instead telling me, a nobody with no power isn't consistent with the behavior of an actual rape victim. In fact, every person I've ever known to lie about being raped told people they knew (and as many as possible) instead of the authorities. Even if all of the above is incorrect, I still p…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:48 PM
10

MISOGYNY! HELP, ADMINS, THIS SEXIST MRA HITLER NAZI IS REPOSTING CONTENT THAT SHOWS WHAT A WOMAN IS ACTUALLY LIKE PLS HELP ME FEMINISM
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:11 AM
10

muh women You have no logical reason to just "give the benefit of the doubt." When someone makes a claim or accusation, it is their responsibility to prove that the claim is true, not the other way around. You don't owe them "the benefit of the doubt," nor does anyone else. Automatically giving "the benefit of the doubt" is how situations like this end in an undeserving person's life being ruined.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:01 AM
5

I've been in a similar situation except the girls (yes, they teamed up) who were spreading shit about me never made the mistake of documenting it to anyone who would sympathize with me. I would love to sue them into the ground for libel, but I have no proof. This kid should do that since he has record of her admitting she lied. Cunt needs to learn a lesson.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 02:00 AM
2

Milo, with the way the media has become so slanted to the left, and the ease with which the average person eats up the narrative and fails to do their own research, answer me this: Do you think we (meaning, everyone who isn't a leftist) actually have a chance?
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 02:01 AM
2

To compare this to being made to feel physically unsafe is hyperbolic at best. Who is "making" a person feel physically unsafe? Is it the unassociated person simply walking down the street? Is it the socially-instilled falsehood that all men are dangerous? Is it a past experience being projected onto a stranger you don't know? "Being made to feel" physically unsafe is hyperbole if I've ever fucking seen it. If you're "made to feel" physically unsafe because someone else is using the same sidewal…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:03 PM
3

Oh, anecdotal hurt feelings aren't valid when it's a man's feelings. They are when a woman is uncomfortable walking down the street when a strange man is around, or when a man glances at her in a way she doesn't like, or when a man she isn't attracted to asks if she'd like to get coffee. But then, it's not just hurt feelings, it's a deeply sexist irony, it is the falsehood that men's opinions on gender issues are not valid because being male is EZ-mode for life, and what would he know about oppr…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:46 PM
3

Regardless, Sarkeesian is not calling for censorship, just criticism. Such pointed and indignant attempts at criticism are as good as censorship as far as anyone should be concerned. The aim is to illustrate how disgusting and intolerable she personally feels the content is, not to meaningfully critique where it came from. The censorship is of the truth of the media she "critiques," rather than directly trying to stop the content from being produced. However, I can't even give you that she doesn…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:36 PM
3

That they chose not to ask for donations (and plenty do, or receive funding from other sources) doesn't have much to do with the money people freely chose to donate to her project. Well, for one thing, there needs to be actual research going on, rather than opinion and conjecture provided by an individual with a DV camera, which is bulk if not the entirety of her "endeavors." Know why they didn't ask for donations? Because they didn't need them and were honest about it. It's not just plain old v…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 08:17 PM
1

I don't care about whatever opinion you have on my education. Right, this is why you were so quick to throw it out when someone challenged your logical skills. Because you don't care what we think.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:54 PM
1

Please provide a documented example of this occurring. This is cute that you think anecdotal, spur-of-the-moment experiences of belittlement in the classroom are going to be documented, particularly when the people with dominion over any possible documentation would also happen to be the ones doing the belittling. gender theory research lol
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:51 PM
2

Do you know that even feminist queen Amanda Palmer says that everything must be fair game in art, right? Even she doesn't respect the likes of Sarkeesian, and I'm pretty sure Palmer is legitimately moar feminist than thou. You know, an actual activist and creative mind, rather than some whiner on tumblr.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:40 PM
1

Well, I guess since Anita's such a brilliant analytical thinker, she could just get right on developing that game. She already recognizes it, so what better what to enlighten us all than by making a game she'd actually be happy with? We already know what she'll have to say about every game under the sun.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:39 PM
3

That it is being presented for free on youtube has no bearing on the money required to produce it. The fact that thousands of other youtubers do it for free, research and all, with no donations has plenty of bearing on it, though. That you choose to ignore this says a lot about your motivations for defending Anita. Didn't you just tell somebody else that she "needs to pay rent and eat" and whatnot as a justification for the dosh she got out of this? You change your tune awfully quick. It's almos…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:37 PM
1

OOOHH HOO HO HOOOO MASTER'S DEGREE In what? And yes, it does matter. But I think I can guess.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:32 PM
2

I have no argument and will now resort to belittling shitposting There is nothing intellectual about a body of "research" in which two people can write virtually the same paper and one is not taken seriously because of what's between his legs. Seriously, if you're a woman and you do a project on male victimhood for your gender studies course, you will at the very least receive earnest counterpoint and be taken seriously. If you happen to be male, people will at best pretend to take you seriously…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:31 PM
4

Considering she rarely even gets her facts straight and deliberately misinterprets plot points and the roles of characters in order to fulfill her predetermined conclusion, no, she doesn't contribute shit She is merely attempting to further her ideology, just like the professors she parrots it from and the writers she quotes in lieu of producing an iota of original thought.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:27 PM
4

You say all of this based on the premise that a person actually needs a sum of money three times the average household income in order to make YouTube videos. How are all these other vloggers doing it for free? The answer is that Anita is at worst a scam artist, and at best an incompetent who thinks she deserves money for youtube videos.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:25 PM
22

Why not avoid gender entirely and call it all genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:02 PM
2

And by the way, all of this is coming from someone who fucking despises children. I may hate them and find them irritating as shit, but that doesn't mean they're not human beings.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:42 PM
2

It's curious that, if police officers consider men so much more dangerous than women, that they don't purposefully avoid approaching men whenever possible, simply to keep themselves safer. It's because it's legally easier to make charges against a man stick, because it's more believable to the courts, to a jury, and to the general public that a man is a threat. This is a good example of how some forms of discrimination can have actually have a positive effect for the victims of said discriminati…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:53 AM
3

I should add that this is not the fault of the women, moreso the fault of the greasy pigs who are sexist against women as to perceive all of them as harmless and sexist against men as to perceive all of them as dangerous
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:38 AM
2

Neither men nor women who do this should get locked up unless it's deliberate. Yes, they should. This is a basic form of child negligence and anybody who thinks it's okay to leave their kid in a hot car on a hot day is obviously not qualified to be a parent. Since the kid is already gone in this situation, the parent at fault should be placed in a setting where they can't create and harm any more children. If they're caught and the child is alive, it should be taken from them immediately and irr…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:32 AM
2

Two points: You don't have to consider yourself a feminist to believe any of these things. Simply trying to be a reasonable human being would suffice Not everyone who calls themselves a feminist would agree with your list, and honestly, most of the modern post-feminists I have spoken with personally would probably disagree with much of it
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:19 AM
5

Just looking pretty is probably good enough for most of the fat greasy pigs out there
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:07 AM
1

Why not just link directly to the KState article?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:05 AM
8

It's not "reverse sexism," sexism is sexism
/r/MensRights14/05/12 11:44 PM
2

You didn't answer her question.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:48 AM
1

May I suggest that this is a manifestation of fear? The fact is that most women are physically weaker than most men. Can this then be used as justification for me to fear and resent women for the legal advantages they have over me, not only because of what might unjustly happen to me but because of the emasculating feeling it would give me on "some primal level?" Does that all sound like fair reasoning to fear and resent all women instead of judging them as individuals?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:36 AM
2

As far from the ideal, perfect definition of feminism as these "retards" may be, they still go around calling themselves feminists and doing things in the name of feminism. Whether they are in line with what feminism is "supposed to mean" or not, they are polluting the public understanding of what feminism means and where problems of freedom really lie. Today's world is much more divided by class than it is by gender.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:29 AM
1

I want a source for this. Not that I doubt it in the least.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:26 AM
1

I think it's more the concept of it being a FB meme for teenage/college age girls to post as if to say "why aren't all men like this for meeeeee?"
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:43 AM
1

Notice how his comment didn't actually imply anything having to do with femininity, except residency of that particular subreddit. Which has men on it, just like this one has women on it. There was nothing sexist about his comment.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 02:29 PM
1

From the article comments: And how telling is it that this morning, at the doctor's office, I saw no fewer than six old people being wheeled or walked into the building by what had to be daughters or daughters-in-law. And since I brought it up, myself (a-hem), let me just also state that my mother-in-law would never see her granddaughter if it were up to her son (who would be too lazy to drive the 2+ hours there)! And my MIL is one of those women who only values men! (And yes, loves her granddau…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 02:07 PM
7

The funny part about it is that Apple is like a technological manifestation of patriarchy/matriarchy; all products must be uniform and proprietary, and will only work in the ways we mandate that they work.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:54 PM
5

assure nervous parents that all new model baby boys born will come wired with a microchip that makes them incapable of date rape (this isn't to say that men are rapemonsters; I've got a good set of men in my life. But one bad man is capable of covering a lot of ground and hurting a lot of people). Any criticism of remarks like this is immediately met with claims that it was "just a joke." Jokes do not belong alongside points which are meant to be taken seriously. This is akin to Limbaugh crying …
/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:51 PM
2

What makes me sad is that much of reddit accepts jezebel as a legitimate source.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:49 PM
2

Sounds like a feminist, but she's no gender egalitarian. "Women should be equal. But men should be less equal."
/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:49 PM
7

Goddamn, dude, not all feminists hate men.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:10 PM
2

I remember this time I was dating this one control freak of an ex. We were having sex, she climaxed and I hadn't. She then just announced she was done and for me to stop, as I was still working towards my own climax. I'd never had anyone in my life just announce they were done before I was, and to stop. She may as well have said "YOU HAVE A PARROT ON YOUR HEAD!" for all the sense it made to me at the time. So, still humping, I start to say "Wait, what?" and then she proceeds to start kicking me …
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:07 PM
2

AKG makes great headphones
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:02 PM
1

Cannot downvote enough
/r/MensRights06/08/11 02:40 PM
2

/r/feminism: "Yeah, well, it's not feminism's fault. The justice system just became this way one day."
/r/MensRights28/06/11 10:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter