| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GirlWritesWhat on the News! over "Dont be that Girl" controversyI agree with a lot that you stated. Since my original comment I have had some discussions with other people (redditors and otherwise) and agree that the original posters were specious. The phrase "Don't be that guy" shows that the target market for the posters are males, and as you stated, males already know the activities engaged in the posters are wrong. Those men who do that aren't morally confused, and are fully aware of the moral implications of their actions. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/13 03:03 PM |
| 2 | GirlWritesWhat on the News! over "Dont be that Girl" controversyGood video, and you make a good point. At first I thought about saying the posters could have been better by being egalitarian: "It's not sex...when they're passed out; Don't be that person" but you're right. Those who are committing those acts are not confused about the morality of the situation. Their moral "governor" might have been affected by alcohol allowing themselves to commit the crime and rue it when they're sober, but at no time are they confused as to the morality of their actions so… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 04:31 PM |
| 1 | GirlWritesWhat on the News! over "Dont be that Girl" controversyThis one is stating that it is wrong for guys to have sex with unconscious girls...good poster, good message. Perhaps you can provide an example of one of the original posters that you find bad and/or with a bad message. I might not have seen them all, or we could have a lively discussion if we disagree :-) | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 02:23 PM |
| 1 | GirlWritesWhat on the News! over "Dont be that Girl" controversyThe original posters were targeting men who victimize women. Good posters with a good message. The new posters about "don't be that girl" were targeting women who victimize men. Also good posters with a good message. The kneejerk reaction comes from the fact that when people make a "response" poster, they tend to think it is applying to the original parties (eg bad men, victimized women). Because of this, they think the new posters are telling legitimate victims to not be "that girl" against bad… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 11:58 AM |
| -1 | Ramifications of accepting a false accusation in a divorce.I think that we all agree that we side with OP based upon the evidence provided and are thus not amiable to OP's wife/soon to be ex-wife. However, calling her "princess" is the exact type of behavior militant feminists use as fuel against MRM when they equivocate it with misogyny. Try to abstain from needless pejorative remarks. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 06:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter