TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sile0 Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by sile0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So?
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:56 AM
2

To me, creepy means 'I don't like that guy and I have no idea why, or I don't want to say why.' Very rarely is there anything truly intuitive or meaningful about those feelings. Translate and move on.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:45 AM
2

And then there's the gf that gets hit on whenever she's not with people, by guys she would never sleep with. All the time, except for times when somebody she tells about these things might actually see. Another way that girls can be downright creepy is by lying compulsively about the amount of attention they receive.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:42 AM
-2

It's not clear what his motivation was when he decided to invade her privacy. I'm not convinced that he believed the child was in any danger, or that he read her email with concern for anything but his desire to know the truth about her. Knowing that the child may have been in danger, it's not entirely clear what actions he took then. So I don't think that we really can defend his actions by saying that he was concerned for the child. Taking the emails to a divorce attorney would have been the b…
/r/MensRights27/12/10 06:55 AM
1

The article put the emphasis on what he did to marginalize what she did. So this news story was really about a cheating wife, and the 'fallacy' of the 'irrelevant topic' of developing cases in the new legal area of invasion of privacy was just a media red herring to distract us all from her adultery?! Get a fucking grip dude, the feminists aren't behind everything.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 06:48 AM
2

Hmm. Nice analogy, here's one that's actually relevant: If your neighbor gave you a key, it becomes a lot harder for him to press unlawful entry charges against you. It starts to look like, given the way he acted (giving you a key and telling you to head down), he should have expected you to enter his house.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:48 AM
-1

That violation is not a red herring. I don't think most people would agree that spouses have 0 expectation of privacy. Imagine if a police officer had done this to a potential suspect, after the suspect checked their email on the police computer. Don't think you would view that as a 'red herring' to draw attention away from the suspect's possession charge. Christ you're as bad as a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:46 AM
2

If I give you a key to my house, I have a hard time saying you we trespassing there, now don't I? It's like the difference between photographing people through open windows of a house, and photographing every person that enters or leaves the house over a two year period. The husband is the former case, and faces years in jail. Your employer is the latter case, and they are perfectly within the law to do that. This guy barely, barely put his big toe across a legal boundry. He shouldn't face jail …
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:42 AM
-2

If it's obviously an unhealthy relationship what the fuck is he doing in it? Sorry, "things were already wrong" isn't a good reason for doing something that's wrong. If the relationship is unhealthy, leave. If it's not, deal with things in a way that is healthy. The behavior of your significant other doesn't justify, in any way shape or form, the things that you do. The person he was doesn't justify her cheating on him, and her cheating does not justify his invasion of privacy. Imagine if a poli…
/r/MensRights27/12/10 03:37 AM
-1

No, there's no contest between the two. One crime doesn't 'go up' against another like that. This man didn't act with the interests of the child, hell there's nothing to show that he cared about the child in any way shape or form. He did what he did because he thought his wife might be cheating on him. There are better ways to do that.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:37 PM
1

I'm not sure that's relevant. I mean, he broke the law. If he actually felt the child was in any danger, accessing her e-mail was not the best thing for the child. He didn't do this for anybody but himself. Or at least, I see no reason to believe this is anything but a husband with trust issues.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:36 PM
2

It's stupid, to draw such a thin line between monitoring packets that go back and forth, and actually requesting those packets. I mean, if she left her password on his computer, he has a right to her password. And if you give somebody the ability to access your account, you give them the right to access your account.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:31 PM
1

Bang on. Neither of them are people I'd admire.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:29 PM
2

Don't see what this has to do with mens rights? Dude broke the law, he's prosecuted like anybody else. I can see the contrast maybe with women not facing punishments for actions like this, but as far as I know no data is really available.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 07:28 PM
2

It's fine to repeat that in defense of women. Repeat that anywhere else and it is obviously sexist. Watch yourself, pig.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 01:22 AM
0

Sorry, thought it was you that said: "I can't leave the fetal position for several hours at a time. I can't even get up to go to the bathroom, let alone concentrate on doing work. There is about one day a month that I am completely useless." I'm gonna go log onto a couple random internet boards and try repeating what you said. We'll see how long it takes, not just for them to disagree with me, but for them to actually ban me from participating there because of my blatent sexism. How's the cake y…
/r/MensRights17/12/10 01:21 AM
1

Yeah, but if you both went through basic training I don't think there's any doubt who would kick the shit out of who. You probably have a lot more physical potential, whereas she is probably very close to her top physical potential right now.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:27 PM
0

You say convicted in bold like it means something. Do military courts in these cases have the same standards as civilian ones? Or does 'conviction' in this context mean something completely different, like 'accused'.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:25 PM
2

So generally women are less capable then men because of their cramps? They can't do things that men could do? Because being unable to push paper 7 days a month might explain a few 'inequalities' that feminists like to go on about. tl;dr Careful, you're sounding awfully sexist there.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:24 PM
1

The OP wants that too, yet somehow you two don't seem in agreement.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:19 PM
1

Yeah, you've been told you're not going to sit in the most dangerous seat on the bus. Life can be so unfair eh?
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:18 PM
1

No. Pissed about a movement saying it's about equality when few things could actually be farther from the truth.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:15 PM
1

oh look more trolling.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:11 PM
1

I think that the definition of feminism as given nowdays (the fight for equality between people, primarily between genders) is sexist to begin with.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 12:12 AM
1

Women have the right not to fight for their country. Men do not? Also, go away troll. You can't just wipe away this inequality by saying 'oh in abstract theory we don't believe men should be drafted either.'
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:51 PM
3

Well obviously that would need to change too.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:45 PM
0

At least you've met some. I have never met a single feminist fighting for anything but exclusively female interests. As far as I knew, they didn't exist, and I'm still not %100 sure I believe you. Wouldn't that person have to call themselves something other than a feminist?
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:44 PM
2

Do you have any source at all? Cause I'm gonna put this to an end and call bullshit right there otherwise. If you can actually provide sources, we can continue with the 'equality of result' vs the 'equality of opportunity' debate.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 11:40 PM
1

Of course people can change. I hold that 'modern, mature view' as well. It seems like you want to give the appearance that I am against that somehow. I am not. I did nothing as a teenager that came anywhere fucking nearing ruining the lives of three innocent men. This is not a stupid, self-centered thing. It's not like she did not understand what these men would go through because of her lies. She knew, and she considered it worth getting what she desired. She may change. She may not. But when c…
/r/MensRights09/12/10 12:19 AM
29

Naming her when she's proven guilty is different from naming them when they are merely accused. Name anybody who is found guilty. Age used to be an indicator of innocence, which is why we protected children. A 16 year old today is every bit as dangerous as anybody else, just as able to kill, or completely and totally ruin a life. The public has a right to know her name, for their own safety. To take away her ability to do this again.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 12:06 AM
9

So, the men were named when the were merely accused, but the women's name was hidden even when she was found guilty?
/r/MensRights07/12/10 11:59 PM
1

Give this man a cookie!
/r/MensRights01/12/10 06:29 PM
2

Argh that's supposed to be 'too'. Damnit. sigh
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:00 PM
0

I support the idea of equal pay to the extent that I think it may a) encourage men to work less overtime for other people and b) encourage men who are truly determined to work overtime to start their own business and do it for themselves, not so somebody else can get ahead.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:25 AM
6

I did to. Stop underestimating the intelligence of your audience, stop simplifying for the lowest common denominator. Too much of culture looks down upon intellectualism.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:22 AM
2

I think that considering physical capability might shed some light for you. Overall I think that men are physically capable of overpowering women, say about 9 times out of ten. People abuse power they have, not power they don't.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 11:38 PM
1

What are you talking about? I'm not assuming that she's lying, or that she's innocent. That's what physical evidence is for. ...as the article claims... How do you perceive the article as claiming anything? This article repeats what she says and very little else. If there are claims in it, they are hers. The newspaper makes no claims here. Consider how "the newspaper claimed that she was innocent." is not at all the same as "the newspaper said that she claimed innocence."
/r/MensRights28/11/10 12:24 AM
1

Yeah, but it's important to distinguish that the article doesn't say that she isn't lying. What you mean to say is "If the women's story makes out," since the article does almost nothing aside from repeat her allegations.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 04:17 PM
2

What is it in this article that makes you believe he is guilty? Was there any physical evidence?
/r/MensRights27/11/10 03:02 AM
1

And yet you associate yourself with her movement...
/r/MensRights14/10/10 03:59 PM
1

I think the problem arises when feminists say things like "I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." - Barbara Jordan
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:55 AM
1

Wow. Despite posting more than 2 pages worth of links, the person answering that question completely fails to provide any actual facts. Aside from the point that almost half of the links resulted in 404 pages, the data behind those assertions simply isn't present. I mean seriously, look at the shoddy quality behind some of this research, the way they cleverly avoid the point. They point out that rape happens to people of all ages, from 2 months to 90 years (hardly provocative dressers), ignoring…
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:42 AM
1

Just as there a varying degrees of rape, there are varying degrees of rapists. And I think that a poster like this just might make a drunken frat boy think twice.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:14 AM
1

Y'know, I see so many people in this thread talk about how feminism is about equality between the sexes, and then I find somebody that says things like this under the wiki category 'American Feminists'.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:09 AM
1

Mostly I think people are leery of a movement which claims to preach equality yet names itself after a specific group and acts only to further the interests of that specific group. If feminism is just a belief in equality, why not just say you believe in equality.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 06:05 AM
1

I only said that because I know it's what every single female I know would say to any female friend in the OP's situation.
/r/MensRights26/09/10 06:07 PM
10

Or find a grown up that doesn't play childish games anymore. This isn't normal, it isn't something 'people do', like so many problems people have it's very indicative of low self worth.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:32 AM
5

Wouldn't you say it's obvious that this relationship is unhealthy for him, and that he should leave? Abusive behavior is a cycle, it may stop temporarily after a nice conversation, but it will come back.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:20 AM
2

What really bothers me about this is the way it presents sexism as something that the vast majority of respectable, educated, hard working and rational human beings partake in. For many years I accepted the completely unfounded claim that inequality in the workspace was entirely due to sexism. And realized that the overwhelming majority of people must look down on women, because this problem is something that is all over, and something that's not going away Obviously most people are sexist, is w…
/r/MensRights12/09/10 03:06 PM
1

What? Why would I skip town just because a women was pregnant? I don't think you understand what I'm saying. You keep talking about pro-choice as if that was somehow relevant to the discussion. Unless you're talking about pro-choosing-an-adoption, I don't really think you're paying attention. Accidental pregnancies happen all the time. Accidental child raising doesn't happen at all; adoption is a choice (for the women at least), each and every time. Perhaps it could say: WARNING: If you decide t…
/r/MensRights13/07/10 02:39 PM
0

What are you even talking about? I think maybe I missed your point, because I'm not seeing anything that has to do with the issue anymore. Women having sex with me face the exact same risks as those having sex with any other fertile man. They might end up pregnant. They face exactly zero chance of having to raise an unwanted child. So do tell, what exactly should this disclaimer say?
/r/MensRights11/07/10 12:35 AM
0

Sex comes with a 0% risk of raising an unwanted child, for women.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 06:53 AM
0

No. The moral fallacy lies in equating an unwanted pregnancy with raising a child. In modern society, the two don't need to have anything to do with each other. This is accomplished through adoption. If a sexual relationship ends up in an accidental pregnancy, then the man is responsible for the pregnancy. But if the man wants to put it up for adoption, and the women decides she wants to have and keep the child, there is nothing accidental about that. She is responsible for raising the child, be…
/r/MensRights10/07/10 06:40 AM
0

We didn't reach an impasse. You have failed to address any of the points I made, you failed to provide any reason for the things you believe, and you failed to make any relevant points of your own. Your entire argument rests on the ignoring the fact that women and women alone have the choice to raise children, and clinging to the false notion that being pregnant must result in raising children. To expect others to take responsibility for a choice you and you alone made, is childish. That's not a…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 05:41 PM
-1

The moral fallacy here is equating an unwanted pregnancy with raising a child. The two are completely unrelated in modern society. A couple might end up in the first situation. Only women have the right to chose the second, and yet they try to avoid the responsibility that comes with it. If a child is produced from a sexual encounter I believe the father has as much of a responsibility to provide for it as does the mother. What responsibility?! The mother has zero responsibility*, she can have a…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 06:40 AM
0

So when you said "your inability to take responsibility for your seed makes me very sad." what you really meant was "A women you had sexual relations with once decided to have a child and your refusal to pay for it makes me very sad."?
/r/MensRights09/07/10 12:45 AM
4

Never mind abortion. Adoption. All these dead beat dad's I hear about, most never wanted children. Most never made any promises. Most are people who would have given the child up for adoption, but never had a choice.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:28 PM
4

And whatever happens with that pregnancy, the mother is the only one to blame, because she is the only one who had any choice. She could have had an abortion. She could have put it up for adoption. She decided to raise a child, you can't hold the guy responsible for a choice he didn't have.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:26 PM
2

Or like don't trust a girl when she tells you it's a parachute? If a guy lies about, or fails, at using a condom, that's a dick move. But if a girl lies about, or fails, at her pill, the guy is to blame? That's a lot like blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:23 PM
-2

Um, adoption? If you don't want to raise a child, you don't have to, plain and simple. Unless you're a man, and the women decides that she's keeping it regardless of what you want. Then you owe money.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter