TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

silent_boo Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by silent_boo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

When women in the US got the vote, there was a big movement of women who did not want it specifically because they assumed that it would, or even should, come with the obligations of the draft or other kinds of state service attached. Fathers, along with the full responsibility, used to get full default custody of their kids in case of divorce. Feminism only became relevant when after the industrial revolution some women could feasibly claim that men are superfluous to them.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 07:24 PM
2

I think that if you go back 50, or at most 100 years, it wasn't taboo to advocate for men's rights. And men's and women's rights would be considered complimentary goals instead of contradictory ones. In that sense, anyone who is an actually conservative thinker today does still advocate for men's rights in their own capacity. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few celebrities and popular figures fall in that category but are just not so vocal in their advocacy.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 11:44 AM
6

Calling what she's doing a profession is an insult to the professionals. What she's doing is nothing more than begging in slightly more fanciful words.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:32 AM
2

I did not literally mean that I can't understand but I completely agree with your explanation of why. The issue is that even the people that are quite vocally opposed to circumcision often don't know that its literal skin farming. I think if they did know it, it would even give a lot of the people from the pro circumcision camp a pause. The arguments about aesthetic preferences or tradition should pale in comparison with supporting a skin farming industry for any reasonable person. Then again, I…
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:12 AM
6

They use the "discarded" pieces of skin to extract enzymes that go into skin treatments. I cannot understand why this fact is not more widely known with all the arguments about circumcision erupting everywhere. Promoting circumcision literally turns a profit for the hospital and the doctors at negetive cost, since they charge you for taking that skin off, so why would they ever stop doing it?
/r/MensRights02/10/23 12:25 AM
1

Yk I hear that a lot, "increased awareness", but all I see are cases of over diagnosing and over prescription of drugs that inevitably ends up messing people's lives up before they're even old enough to realise what's happening to them. You can read multiple such first hand accounts in this post itself. Just because a lot of countries are experiencing the same trend doesn't necessarily imply that its organic or that it's going in a healthy direction. And just because you get a correct diagnosis …
/r/MensRights05/09/23 05:35 AM
2

I'm not sure why you're looking for an alternate explanation for it when you're staring right at the answer. ADHD and ADD prescription meds have psychosis and extreme mood swings as the side effects. If you mess around with the dosage enough, which is likely with a kid, you can get hallucinations too. These drugs are strong enough to drastically rewire your brain over time. There's clearly a lot of demonization of things that normal boys do. Its quite obvious that if you treat them with stimulan…
/r/MensRights04/09/23 02:24 AM
1

Is it more likely that nearly half of a population suddenly has an undiagnosed disorder that requires constant medication or is it perhaps calling normal kid behaviour pathological and making it into a diagnosis for the convenience or ideological belief of the adults?
/r/MensRights04/09/23 02:09 AM
1

I would laugh, too. Not because it's funny, but because it's so absurdly tragic that you either laugh at it or break down and have an existential crisis.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:50 AM
6

100% Yes!! This is really getting out of hand. As a woman it is almost impossible making new friends as everything you say can and will be used against you. So many women are just constantly on the verge of a breakdown or of exploding at you for something they found offensive. Any group of girlfriends just constantly devolves into bitter and resentful ranting about the world at large. You're not allowed to be grateful or optimistic about anything and you get treated horribly if you accidentally …
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:38 PM
1

Good work! I only wish I could have done something like that in my school. I would suggest that you mention or actually end your talk with actual solutions instead of just the depressing statistics. One big issue is that the whole mental health infrastructure is oriented towards solutions that optimise for women's needs. Men don't benefit as much from sitting and talking about what's bothering them and often struggle to admit that things are not going well. Solutions that work for men seem to in…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 10:27 PM
1

I already do do that for my male relatives and a handful of friends. Apart from that, if they reach out for a talk then I am open to it. I'm sorry but I can't give moral support to someone giving up on life. I understand how you can end up in such a situation but there's still nothing moral about giving up. And you can't help someone who doesn't want to be helped.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 06:56 PM
1

Thank you for the advice. In my experience, it is really difficult to get men to do anything for their own sake. Most of them will never ask for help and will be ashamed if they are offered it without being asked. That's why I always ask those that are open to it what I can actually do to help. Very few real answers so far. If they stop trusting me on top of everything else because I'm a woman, I suppose I'll be joining all the rest of the hopeles people here.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 11:00 AM
1

I don't think I'd make a good father figure or role model to men as a young woman. I try to help the men in my life any way I can but even saying that sounds so feeble and hopeless after reading this post. How can you help someone who has given up on trying?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 10:05 AM
2

Not really, I'm not that delusional. I guess I'm asking what I can do to help men.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:44 AM
2

Hypothetically, if someone did care and wanted to help the situation, what would it take, do you think?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:39 AM
2

This is one of the most depressing threads I've read in a while. The article itself just lists a bunch of depressing facts and ends abruptly with no real conclusion. Have we all really just given up at this point?
/r/MensRights07/06/23 09:34 AM
1

But surely, at least a handful of lawsuits should have happened at some point and the social media platforms been forced to enforce their own rules.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:43 AM
3

Well you can do it as revenge but when the information is out you can't really hide it again, the damage is already done.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:35 AM
5

If you actually have that kind of time on your hands, you would do better to go find and message individual dudes that are being doxxed. Or find a way to automate that process. I suspect that most guys that are being posted there don't even use Facebook so it really is a difficult task. Otherwise, a better strategy is to avoid the crazy women who do stuff like that in the first place. Avoid them like the plague, honestly.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:26 PM
8

You can't counter doxing with some more doxing. Those groups should be against the general rules of literally every social media platform. I'm not entirely sure why they are allowed to go on.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 11:06 PM
12

The whole world is on the same rollercoaster only some countries are in the front carts and some at the back.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 09:19 AM
1

It's not a female issue, it's a culture issue. In India there is very little awareness or acceptance of mental health issues. In my experience, people in older generations were so involved in each other's lives that you did not need to be aware, rather, it helped if you were numb to them. People in our generation sometimes end up the most ignorant about it because they were lucky enough to not have any issues themselves and they've escaped the older close-knit culture too. You need to seek profe…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 10:36 AM
1

As a woman you want a man who is a potential threat to everyone else except to you personally. If the physical strength of a man isn't threatening to you then it wont be for anyone else either. But once you're in the interpersonal space, the vast majority of men never ever intentionally harm women and so there is no real threat. In fact, the more threatening the man was from afar, the more attractive he becomes when you're involved with him.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:19 AM
1

I'm sorry but it's a bit funny that this is supposed to be some profound revelation about what's at the root of all the grievance politics. Is the female experience of realizing that you're inherently weaker really such news to men? Or even to women for that matter. While I agree that this is one of the reasons for it I think its oversimplification to say that it's the one and only reason behind it. There is also the fact that in the modern world we denigrate and dismiss pretty much everything t…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 10:05 AM
2

It's covert intrasexual competition between women and a lot of men fall for it and nod along.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 10:21 AM
1

Just because it's a "profession" that's existed forever doesn't mean it was considered normal. It is and has been stigmatized in most cultures and civilisations. Women have literally never been as promiscuous as they are now because of easy access to contraceptives.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 05:53 AM
2

If you think that if you turned into a woman your best option would be becoming a prostitute then I don't think I can change your mind about that. It's just depressing to me that we've reached a point where its considered normal. That women see themselves as commodities to be sold for material profits and men wholeheartedly agree with them.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:01 AM
5

Seriously, I'm genuinely scared by how normalized prostitution of all kinds has become. People just take it in stride and get mad at you for even criticising it.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:40 AM
6

That made me chuckle
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:15 AM
1

I don't want to be the internet doctor but I do know that sometimes changing which pill you're on can at least reduce the depression(I know because it happened to two friends). Also, do none of the alternative contraceptives work? Having looked at the literature on it in detail, I don't think hormonal birth control is worth the benefits in the end at all.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:13 AM
7

I don't know either. Do men really think the best part of being a woman is the opportunity of selling your body for a higher price? How unimaginative..
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:59 AM
1

Too much legal risk in relationships. I only get into relationships as a woman because I know that even though the laws tilt my way I can still choose to be completely fair with whoever I'm with. Lopsided, unfair relationships aren't really relationships at all I think.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:58 AM
2

I never said men have it better than women either! But if you're going to self destruct the first good deal you get in life then what's the point of being a woman anyway?
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:53 AM
0

Right, but being treated like and coming to believe that you're ruined or tainted with no way out of it is worse than either of those.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:32 AM
-2

I never said being poor was easy, just that there are far worse things to be than poor.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 11:08 PM
-2

Lol I didn't realise I was replying to a literal child. Sure buddy, you do that and good luck to you.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:31 PM
-2

Lots of girls do it and it always comes back to haunt them, you're just not always there to see it go downhill. Suppose you sell those pictures and make an insane amount of money, what do you do with it then? You didn't really earn it so it won't bring you any satisfaction and everyone around you will be resentful of how easy you had it. You'll be doubting every friendship and every relationship wondering if they're only looking to take advantage of you. Guys will see you as forever ruined becau…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:10 PM
3

If I was a man I'd probably be living like a monk and be a lifelong celibate by choice.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:54 PM
10

You think being a woman would be easy and then you say shit like this.. You think that it doesn't take a toll on your mental health to sell yourself? It doesn't matter if you're doing it to yourself, that actually makes it worse. It seems harmless enough but it really isn't.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:51 PM
2

One way you can snap someone out of this kind of thinking is to point out that their premise leads to the most absurd conclusions. For example, if you say that women have always been oppressed by men, then you're essentially saying that historically women have been so weak and lacking in character that they couldn't even sway their own sons and grandsons in favour of women. They were always the ones responsible for taking care of kids and yet they failed to instill in them things that seem so se…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 09:18 PM
1

You clearly don't know what a 10/10 corrupt government looks like. US government at least bothers to pretend not to be corrupt.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:02 AM
2

About an 8
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:12 AM
0

I believe it's more evil to say that it's better not to exist than to suffer for existing. I'm not downplaying the terrible unfairness of the situation but you have to be a special kind of knuckle head not to notice that there is still much in life that makes it worth living. I mean you clearly think your life is worth living- you're still here- so why is any baby boy's life worth any less to you? Especially if he's clearly wanted by his parents.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 11:41 PM
1

I know this lady says all the "right" things(the one asking the question) but every time I've seen her talk she has this creepy shit eating grin on her face. Its really unsettling, I keep thinking she's only in it to cause controversy and make a name for herself, even though there's better ways of doing that.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:16 PM
2

That's what I thought.. So the man she quoted never makes a case for violence at all. But Elsie here, is making a case for it in what I can only assume is frustrated exasperation. It's not a particularly well written argument but what I think she's trying to get at is the fact that there is no acceptable retaliation for women who are being controlling and domineering. In any society, it is quite acceptable for a man acting in such a way to be punished, even physically, but very few of them will …
/r/MensRights20/11/22 12:06 PM
2

Can you link to the original post? In the excerpt given the only person that seems to be advocating for violence is the author lady but it's such an inflammatory title that I wonder if its deliberately that extreme just to draw people's attention. What is the actual argument she makes? In my opinion, there is definitely an impasse if a wife starts becoming controlling or abusive and there is literally no recourse for the husband or anyone else around. It's possible that the author is writing abo…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:37 AM
19

You'll have to look up the actual stats on this but they do collect data on reported reasons for filing for a divorce and by far the biggest reason is dissatisfaction. There are other categories that cover possibilities of infidelity or emotional, verbal or physical abuse and so on. "Dissatisfaction" is like a catch all term for "nothing was wrong in the marriage but I wanted to end it anyway". Considering the perks women get after the divorce, it makes sense that a big chunk is reported to be f…
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:29 PM
1

As a chemistry student I have to wonder though, is it really primarily affecting men? Of course, there is the fact that women should care anyway that their dads, male friends and family members and partners might be affected by something this drastic. But there are similarly dramatic statistics coming in about endocrine dysfunction disorders, like PCOS, endometriosis, early thelarchy, infertility etc, in women as well. Why is there no discussion of this?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:30 AM
9

Ask him how he stays optimistic with all the statistics and morose and depressing subject matter in his books.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:44 PM
8

One would think there's plenty of money to be made in a large scale health emergency. Most people I've tried to talk to about this are just too scared to contemplate the possibility that it is actually true.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:52 AM
28

I have so far seen this posted on at least 5 other subs and all anyone can say about it is how good it is and how we're a scourge on this planet. Ignoring the usual reddit misanthropy in it, how is almost no one talking about the health implications of it for the already living people? Sperm counts don't just magically start dropping. A drop this fast and this widespread means underlying endocrine disorders to such an extent that I believe it should be considered a global health emergency. It is…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:15 PM
3

Ig even if you hate the game one can't help but admire someone who wins it against all odds? Besides, I do wonder how much of the stuff he says and even does is sincere. It all reeks of kayfabe done to game the system and have plausible deniability while doing it.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:26 PM
1

Thanks for the lengthy explanation I suppose but it was entirely unnecessary. I never suggested that evolution ever dictates how we must behave. It does inform us about why we behave a certain way. But it also informs us about what our biological limitations are, and in that way tells us what are good and bad long term strategies. Pretending away the behavioural constraints that have been literally part of the habitat we evolved for is a dumb strategy. That was my point. You can't overcome or ig…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 08:31 PM
1

How about you bring some of them up that contradict the points made? Just because we can observe our instinctual behaviour doesn't mean we have enough control over it to consciously change it by much. Neither does it mean that it would be evolutionarily lucrative to do so.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 07:20 PM
4

Not biologically, but socially.. Oh so you accept that there is a clear difference between women and trans women but you'll stick to the "transwomen are women" subversion tactic anyway? Why not instead say "trans women are socially women"? You'll find that almost no one disagrees with that statement, but I suppose to not rile people up goes against your goals. It's not discrimination to point out basic truths. Just by the fact that you accept the biological difference, if you insist that one is …
/r/MensRights04/11/22 05:44 PM
1

You don't have to look at how prisoners and big cats behave to artificially base your society on it. Those two are clearly mentioned as examples or a reflection of how things work in reality. Big cats are just one such example but there is evolutionary continuity between species and their patterns of interactions do reflect human instincts to a degree. With the prisoners' statistics mentioned it shows a very specific selection of the population based on behaviour and the demographic breakdown of…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 05:29 PM
4

Identifying as a woman doesn't literally make you a woman. The whole point of the social identity of being trans is that you are not the category you identify as but out of social conventions and politeness you get treated as if you are. The statement "trans women are women" is such a moronic slogan most people wont even bother to engage with it. That's why you're getting downvoted
/r/MensRights04/11/22 05:20 PM
7

There's such irony in the fact that despite knowing and correctly laying out all these facts the man himself is quite feeble against the system. A system that is basically the male "chivalrous" instinct gone rogue, so that it will punish anyone for speaking simple truth just to defend the honour and reputation of the collective Woman. Despite all that men can accomplish, they are blindly beholden to women's arbitrary whims and approval and to such a degree that they will literally destroy everyt…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:10 PM
2

Wow calm down. It's not an accusation, it's an observation. Not one person in that stream ever excuses the male only draft, let alone advocate for it. And people who are free to choose their own values have indeed chosen to serve their countries in the past. That's what they're discussing- that that kind of public initiative is something the authoritarian bullies can't rely upon anymore.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 03:32 PM
3

They do speak out for men and the linked video doesn't have anything of the sort of statement OP is trying to claim here. Give it a listen if you don't believe me.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:41 PM
2

martinez said americans don't love america enough to fight for it in case of an invasion (yes, they're imagining the very likely scenario of of the USA actually being invaded instead of doing the invasion), so men should be drafted until they learn to. of course this leaves women free not to "love america". Where did you get that idea from? He clearly said that a draft wouldn't be needed if men had enough love for their country and a stake in its survival. Meaning that since it is needed that me…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 01:39 PM
1

No, I was pointing out the various scenarios where the “1 man, 100 women” can’t work as well as it would on paper. Where exactly were you pointing that out? Your comment doesn't even mention that scenario. All you've pointed out is a bunch of behavioural patterns that are rapidly growing in numbers and will doubtless lead to species wide extinction if they become as pernicious as you say.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:16 AM
1

It's way more fucked up to say "gays are disposable" then it is to say that men are disposable. How and why? I read all your comments and you haven't explained shit. You just ask rhetorical questions to people trying to catch them into saying something offensive to you and "hey! You can't say that!" Is your entire argument. You can't remove all the qualifiers that go with the argument, which is a mistake OP did as well. In a game theoretical context, with reproductive pressures in mind, men are …
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:10 AM
1

It's 30 years actually. The potency goes up and down but most women are fertile for about 30 years of their lives or more.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:24 AM
1

So species wide extinction is "interesting"? What a morbid thought..
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:17 AM
1

I'm not sure why there's so much squabbling over this but the answer is simple. Yes, in a purely biological sense, gays and lesbians are less valuable than heterosexual women, same as how infertile women are less valuable than fertile ones. The fact is that in most traditional cultures homosexuality is seen as decadent and immoral for the same implicit reasons. Harsh as it sounds, in collectivist societies it is seen as wasteful and selfish to throw away your reproductive capacity for a mere pre…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:09 AM
1

Wow the comments are a mess here. To answer your question, men are more disposable than women because of the asymmetrical reproductive capacities. Notice that "more disposable than their counterpart" does not mean that men are actually disposable. I personally don't like this way of thinking about it. Instead, consider that all humans have inherent value to them but, because of being the limiting factor in reproduction, women get a bonus. That is, of course, a purely biological constraint. We ar…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:58 AM
2

Is this seriously a post in a men's rights sub to discuss what's the correct pejorative for men?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:29 AM
3

Yeah this whole spiel reeks of the same thing I mentioned before. You're not really a nihilist. You just carry around a pet void with you to throw into it anything in life that you don't like. Call it whatever name you want and cite whatever philosopher but that is what you're doing, and the evidence is the fact that of all the different philosophies you purposely choose one niche kind that conveniently let's you think a certain kind of way. The fact is that a "why not" to every "why" is just en…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:53 AM
3

If nothing matters and everything is meaningless how do you get out of bed in the morning? And why? Why do you do anything at all? What makes one decision better than the alternative if nothing matters? Why do you even exist? If you really had thought it all the way through instead of using nihilism as a trash bin you can dump all unpleasant thoughts into, you would be depressed and lonely. Not that I want you to be so. If its working for you then that's good enough for you. But don't look down …
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:24 AM
5

The article linked is so openly bitter, resentful and spiteful towards men I don't even have a response to it. Good luck to the author living a fulfilling life with that attitude. What I'm more interested in is the claim within the very first paragraph that unmarried women are the happiest demographic. I see the claim all over the place and yet even after following all the linked sources I have yet to find any reliable numbers that actually substantiate the claim. There's one book by one researc…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:15 AM
1

Well sweetheart, I'm not "people", I'm one person. Do you agree with the people that say that it's romanticizing violence against women? If you do then I'm surprised you're on this sub. If you don't then you're being hypocritical about the whole thing. I personally think that, irrespective of the gender, if it fits the story and theme of the fiction then it's not "romanticizing" or any other kind of subversion for that matter.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:59 PM
3

Oh there it is! Finally something we can all agree on! you're a clown. Thanks for showing your real face!
/r/MensRights14/10/22 08:34 AM
3

Do you not understand the difference between fiction and real life?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 08:21 AM
3

Yes, it is cathartic, to see the fiction of a hot young woman who turns into a demon and murders people who drugged, beat up and raped her. Do you have the same sentiment about all slasher movies? Plenty have men killing women in gruesome ways, some with a brutal rape followed by the murder. You honestly sound like the feminists complaining about any women being killed in any movies.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 08:18 AM
1

As a young woman, it makes for good catharsis for all the weird teenage stuff. Things like insecurities, body image issues, confusion at betrayals from friends and predatory older men trying to get close to you. I don't think the deaths of the men are taken very seriously by the movie at all. It's just as serious as a slasher movie. Definitely not for everyone, and I don't really understand why its considered feminist at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:43 AM
2

My guess is that two things happened: the censorship got a lot worse over time and the people who only joined after gamergate because it was trendy, found more popular ideologies to feed on so that they became a lot less active. I also think that because of the censorship some of the biggest personalities that used to post on here all the time moved to other platforms or made up their own groups like the Honey Badgers. Reddit is just a very hostile place for these topics now compared to 5/6 year…
/r/MensRights21/09/22 08:40 AM
1

You are already on this sub so is it really that difficult to search for the answer where its directly articulated by so many people? Here: https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Men%27s_Rights_Movement If you scroll down to the "Issues" section you'll find a good outline for the goals of the MRA movement. It isn't an actual list of rights because it's a global movement and every jurisdiction has different legal challenges regarding all the issues listed. If you are really asking in good faith I can find you…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 12:12 AM
9

That is true if she is actually correct about the abuse. So many people call completely reasonable behaviour abusive now, I have trouble taking anyone's word for it.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 04:21 AM
0

I don't think that was her warning. It was because of that end that I actually appreciated the piece: it acknowledges that men having problems are worth our attention just because their own suffering matters. Its very rare to see that. Usually, a man suffering will only get any sympathy if his suffering causes some women or children to suffer as well.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:22 PM
3

Well its different in that it recognizes men's suffering as a problem by itself rather than claiming that it's a problem because it inconveniences women. At least that was my impression of it. It does point out that it's going to cause women problems too of course but I didn't think it blamed anything for anything really. The article is surprisingly devoid of any such judgement.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:19 PM
44

I clicked on the link expecting a hit-piece vilifying anti-feminist men but was pleasantly surprised by genuine and earnest journalism with almost negligible judgement or even opinion. Good one!
/r/MensRights15/08/22 07:33 AM
9

That's what I thought. But for some reason it's not worth a mention that women can't find stable long term relationships anymore? Are we just supposed to pretend that because women are choosing from a smaller and smaller pool of men that the resulting relationships are inherently healthy?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:51 AM
18

Wouldn't the dating opportunities necessarily decrease for both heterosexual men and women at the same time?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:14 AM
2

I don't know about "more" but I make it a point to speak up, and not just once in a while but almost every time. I wish that was enough to take away the resentment.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 04:46 AM
5

I'd also like to point out that women's rights and feminism are not synonymous. One is about rights owed to women, the other about entitlements and privileges above and beyond.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 10:13 PM
9

I'm sorry where are you from? As far as I know there's seriously no place on the planet where there's actual gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:12 PM
6

Probably because anonymity? It's not so easy to tell just from text or even usernames.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:30 AM
-1

It's really amusing to me how self centred and frankly juvenile you made that sound. Truly emblematic of just how accurate the line is. Generation of men raised by women indeed..
/r/MensRights27/07/22 05:54 AM
3

Yes, that is the case in most countries across the world. And what's more, apart from this legal definition of rape, there is a massive imbalance in policy for establishing mens rea. In places where men can actually be raped by legal definition, it's still damn near impossible to get the perpetrator convicted. And when you can get a conviction the punishment is nowhere close to the punishment men get for the same conviction, just because of the personal bias of judges.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 04:17 AM
3

Oh that? I think it happens to everyone, only it doesn't show as clearly for women that's all.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:23 AM
3

Is that because of the way it looks or when it just feels weird? You're raising more questions than you're answering honestly.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:50 AM
4

So men, what's wrong? (wrong answers only!) Sorry couldn't resist lol
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:02 AM
7

I'm actively arguing against name calling here.. idk what you're arguing with me about. Do you think the people calling this sub woman hating or incel are helping or harming the situation you described? Words become actual intention to harm when you give these guys nowhere to turn to for help and understanding. It's a reaction to being shunned and vilified.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:39 PM
4

That's a completely fair criticism except for the part about woman hating. Considering that a lot of other "manosphere" subs got banned making all the discourse on those subjects flood on here, it still isn't anywhere close to actually woman hating. Criticism, however harsh, is not hate. Actual hate does get a lot of pushback on here too. And proof of the fact that it isn't a hateful sub is that a significant chunk of people on here are women themselves.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 07:07 PM
4

There's a vast difference between the misuse of legal/judicial power I'm referring to and the victim narrative that feminists peddle. You're deliberately misunderstanding me here.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:35 PM
17

If that is how you feel then you don't understand the core issue here. If you are given the right to just point a finger and be able to destroy people's lives with impunity, and then to profit off of it, whether you have the moral character to avoid the temptation or not, it still makes you quite a dangerous person to be around. The more one sided the laws become, the more dangerous it makes women to be around. And I say that as a woman who really sees and understands the temptation in it myself…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:24 PM
21

My guy.. I am not a guy. It's funny that you'd assume that I am just because I'm defending men. And in the current legal system women are enabled and encouraged to be mean and scary. That it actually ends up making most women actually quite scary to be around is absolutely a men's rights issue, how can it not be? That's the point you're missing here.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:12 PM
19

Those two things are not mutually exclusive. The laws are skewed because of the feminist lobbying and even then, individual women still have the capacity not to take advantage of them. Posts can be both, complaining about women and about men's issues, and still be completely legitimate. That being said, quite often the top posts here are quite bitter and resentful lately but that's basically any sub nowadays. That's what the platform promotes because that's what gets the most engagement. The fac…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:03 PM
597

If you accept that it isn't the incel, woman-hating sub that people think it is then you're forced to accept that there are legitimate grievances being expressed here. That's really inconvenient for most people when they're comfortably convinced that women are the only ones that ever suffer any injustice.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:42 AM
5

If someone finds that its hygienic and reduces chances of infections to cut off the outer ear, will you then have no problems with cutting them off without anesthesia and when you're still an infant?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 11:32 PM
3

This article doesn't have much to do with men's rights, in fact, its entirely focused on women. Why post this here?
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:46 AM
4

I'm really glad I give you hope but if you ask me you still shouldn't change your decision. Think about it this way- however unjust for men and one sided the laws are, no one can force women to take advantage of them, that still remains a choice for women. But, all the societal poisoning of the well notwithstanding, how many people are there really who wouldn't take advantage of the situation and make their life as easy as possible? I don't know if even I could resist that temptation. If you fee…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:26 PM
13

Among other reasons, because I can't stand to see injustice. But right now I can't do much about the injustice I see men suffering from. Being on here reading what people have to say about it is the best I can do atm. I'm also extremely fed up of older women, professors, collegues in my college and workplace pushing feminism down my throat. It feels like being groomed into the victim narrative and it's incredibly demoralizing. Being here is like an antidote to that.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:09 AM
1

That part is, unfortunately, not likely to change anytime soon. I don't know if we even want it to change. But none of it is a good enough excuse for men to have fewer rights.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:57 PM
6

The double standards for men and women have always irked me. As a girl and woman who has always had the more masculine interests and hobbies, I was always struck by the silently efficient comradary between boys and men. For most men, there's a sense of the utmost dignity in bearing your burdens without making a single peep about it. So when I first heard the outcry about how bad women have it I wasn't ready to just take it in stride. I actually investigated the matter quite thoroughly. I knew fr…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 08:03 AM
1

I think that the whole enterprise of feminism from start to finish has been fueled by resentment, delusionary hysteria and undue feelings of unfairness. Just because the hydra has sprouted a hundred more heads doesn't mean they aren't all still attached to the same corrupt corpus.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:53 AM
1

Screen all women extensively before you spend any amount of time alone with them. Individual women who will not abuse unfair laws on principle do exist, although they might be hard to find. Have female relatives "chaperone" whenever possible and needed. Have a phone recording in your pocket around anyone you suspect of being insane. Sadly, there's not much else you can do.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:46 AM
1

There's a default for how male and female sexual behaviour is perceived. Female sexual behaviour is seen as receptive and Male behaviour is seen as pursuing by default. People don't even realise they have this double standard usually. For example, a woman touching herself, eyeing you suggestively will most often be perceived as a "come and get this" while for a man its perceived as a "I'm coming to get you". This is for biological/evolutionary reasons that I wont get into here. But this means th…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 06:16 AM
6

Well that was clear to me from the start. I've heard people casually claim that we can overcome whatever fertility crisis we're going to have with technology. That artificial insemination can feasibly replace natural conception and so on. I'm extremely doubtful about that idea- it might be enough to keep us from going extinct but that's about it. What this whole paradigm leaves out though is that low T levels don't just mean no viable sperm. It means weaker, unhealthy, effeminate men. It means t…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 12:52 AM
7

I'm sorry to nitpick but what does "western men globally" mean? The only raw data on T levels I've seen has been from western countries but some articles call it a global problem. The more I read about it the more confused I am about this point. The reason it matters whether it's a western issue or global one and whether it's about the same across the world or maybe more pronounced in certain places, is that we can actually point to more specific trends and narrow down the possible reasons for t…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:11 PM
19

These days? More like that's what they always do
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:41 AM
55

The fucking gall on these people! By saying that being a woman inherently makes you innocent by default you're also saying that women don't have the moral agency that men have. That's the worst and most condescending kind of sexism there can be.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 08:06 AM
2

Well good for you, though I highly doubt your claim. Are you really saying that what you don't remember has no bearing on your wellbeing? By that logic, to repeat myself, assaulting or raping babies or even sedated/sleeping/unconscious people should be legal and accepted.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:19 PM
3

If chopping it at 18 doesn't make sense to you why does chopping it when you're a baby make any sense? Are you more sensitive to pain now than when you were a baby? Are babies more likely to be traumatized or are adults? If you seriously think it doesn't affect you to chop a piece of your skin off when you're a baby then you must think that assaulting or raping babies is harmless too. Absolutely fucking insane.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:12 PM
12

It's not an issue of preference, it's an issue of bodily autonomy. Think about what you just said, whether they are cut or not they're happy with their penises and don't care enough. If being cut or not makes no difference in the end why is it a norm to violate men's bodily autonomy when they're 8 days old. Why cut part of their skin off if it makes no difference? If you've seen one of these operations actually happen, it definitely is horribly painful to the baby. I just don't understand the ra…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:58 PM
8

Do you fucking read the stuff you've written here? An operation that is too damn traumatizing for an adult man should be performed on a 8 day old baby while it wails and screams for it's life because it's better that way? In most cases the baby isn't even anaesthetized. And for fucking what? Do you think babies can't be traumatized? I can't fucking believe I have to spell this out for you but it absolutely hurts them and possibly a lot worse than it does adults. There is plenty of evidence showi…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:50 PM
3

I really hope you can find some outlet for your urge for play. Don't listen to people who say its unnatural or mean or whatever. There are a lot of people moralising about it but you can still find people and situations that work for you. Don't give up. I find that I have the urge too and it's mostly expressed in the form of sexual play(which gets pretty intense usually). Maybe that would work for you too? In any case, good luck!
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:57 AM
2

What makes someone a femlurker? I'm female and I lurk in this sub but that's only because I am a men's rights advocate and don't always have a lot to say. I'm here because I like to read what other MRAs are thinking and sometimes to speak up if I feel like it. I hope I'm not "infiltrating"
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:50 AM
2

I think you're mixing up two things that are related but not exactly identical. Actively going against and trying to breed out natural urges seems to be a widespread trend. The gender/sex specific behaviour being frowned upon is a part of the trend. The horse play is part of the first but not the second category here because girls naturally enjoy it too though they maybe grow out of it earlier or have different ways of doing it. I agree that both is incredibly harmful though. I was naturally qui…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 07:54 AM
2

The answer is game theoretical. Male and female are categories based on whether your body is made with the bigger gametes or smaller ones. Bigger gamete cells are more energy intensive and so fewer in numbers and so more precious while the opposite is true for the smaller gametes. It is in our species', and any species', evolutionary interests to favour the females because ultimately the number of females are the limiting factor when it comes to reproduction. That's how fundamental male disposab…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:59 PM
2

I watched this video of hers for the first time more than 6 years ago. I rewatch it about once a year since. The sequence of events she outlined really striked me as impeccable from the start and that is as devastating as she makes it out to be in the video. I keep coming back to it again and again to track the "progress".
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:56 PM
1

I don't think women have any issues on the same scale or dimension as men's issues. The thing is that every society has the intention of giving its version of the best life to women but it doesn't always end up favourably for individual women. Some societies value safety, so the women who want to be independent are held back. Some societies value achievements so the women who want a simple quiet life are coerced into a life that doesn't suit them. I think that the one through line across culture…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:18 AM
5

Wtf is this article? It's the kind of insanity that gets worse the more you think about it, a bottomless pit. I'm out of metaphors to even describe it properly.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 01:02 PM
2

Math makes sense to me like nothing else does. I was a natural at it and so I was always a favourite of my math teachers. Most other teachers hated me because I asked questions in class that they couldn't easily answer.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 06:31 PM
8

Math
/r/MensRights25/01/22 07:46 AM
2

It depends on the kind of persons and interaction you're talking about. I can only speak for myself in this, of course, but it's easy to spot bad actors if your eyes are open. Otherwise, most men are not genuinely threatening- especially knowing that I have all the modern recourses to my benefit. We do live in a very sophisticated society. In fact, I personally find a tiny possibility of danger exciting rather than scary, and I'm not alone in this. By tapping into that instinct, I mean that men …
/r/MensRights17/03/21 02:34 PM
5

Men certainly have a sense of caution around women but it is a really weaker instinct than the reverse for women since the biological cost of a misjudgment is so much bigger for women (without modern inventions, that is). Honestly, men are better served by tapping into this instinct nowadays because we've flipped over all the risks and potential costs to men with the help of technology as well as laws. Think about it- women have multiple unilateral birth control methods and even if they choose n…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 01:33 PM
9

I don't think men can do much about it because it is a deliberate Kafka trap. Innocent men are bound to vehemently deny that they would ever commit such horrific crimes because the overwhelming majority of them are in fact incapable of it. But the denial itself is seen as a sign of guilt and the small number of repeat offenders are given as proof. It's an intentional tactic and in my opinion the only way out is to just not play their game, disengage and ignore the accusations without becoming de…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:35 AM
2

It isn't really a recent discovery but there really isn't anywhere else to express how much I admire the quiet efficiency of men. There are so many men in their own ordinary lives, quietly and tirelessly getting things done that absolutely everyone relies upon, and with no expectation of appreciation or care from anyone. There's a solemn pride in it that I have only recently come to understand. I wish more people noticed it.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 06:58 AM
18

The captain at the bottom really reads like- "happy international servants day to all my loyal unquestioning servants for doing all our work for us! Equality for the win everyone! Tune into our livestream to learn how to please your betters and become a slave" Disgusting..
/r/MensRights19/11/20 10:55 PM
1

Personally I prefer it when people don't act entitled without cause. (as a bi woman) I will insist on paying my way until I really get to know the person, friends or potential gf/bf. Its alright to sometimes demand a treat if the other person is close enough, but someone you've just met is not really worth it. it's a rule that let's you avoid potential moochers.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 01:12 PM
2

If they are put off by you not paying maybe they weren't right for you? Maybe it's a good shit-test
/r/MensRights05/05/20 09:56 AM
6

And that's the ones that know and admit they have been abused
/r/MensRights05/05/20 09:51 AM
21

And who gets to decide what is unsolicited? This is giving every woman the power of a dictator. What's stopping someone from using it as a bludgeon against men? What if someone takes pictures of a guy's dick without his consent and uses it to make allegations? Think these things through people!!
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:02 PM
2

Because they shouldn't and don't need to ask permission, thankfully for everyone, to voluntarily work in a profession that probably wouldn't exist if not for their likes that came before them. I don't understand how the kind of tyrant comes about that feels they can dictate what other people should be allowed to do with their own personal lives.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:56 AM
3

I understand that its not really fight or flight, but fight, flight or freeze. The issue is that you can't convict someone for a crime when the intent isn't clear. Tragically, anything sexual is necessarily messy and not all signals can be mutually understood. I don't claim to know how to avoid injustice in either direction but convictions without mens rea are definitely not the answer.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 04:12 PM
5

I think it's more common than you realise. Maybe not as extreme as what feminists do but definitely very common. Maybe not even done consciously most of the time. I think most people try it in one situation or another but women just get away with it much much more often than men. You're right about being treated like children too. That's part of the victim narrative I think. We do instinctively excuse children's mistakes more than adults after all. But there's the trap of giving up your agency i…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 01:01 PM
10

Well there's usually power to be gained by pretending helplessness. We are all sucker for a victim's story. Its dishonest and can often backfire but the boost must be addictive especially for lazy folk.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:47 PM
34

Honestly, I would say it's exactly the opposite. Women are the ones who get propositioned because they hold the power of decision on whether the relationship will exist or not. We also get to decide the boundaries of most sexual situations(unless pathologies are involved) and anyone who pretends otherwise is playing up a threat narrative. I would go so far as to say that one of the primary reasons men are physically bigger and stronger is that they need that advantage to catch up for power in in…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:35 PM
10

Is not the word "uncircumcised" disturbing to anyone else? Its such an absurd inversion of reality, assuming genital mutilation to be the default.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 06:26 PM
0

From personal experience, men are even less likely to think you're cool if you come out as a men's rights advocate (unless you're in a very niche group of people indeed). Women assume you've been brainwashed but men assume you're malicious against other women. Its usually the fastest way to get dehumanised.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 07:28 PM
0

It isn't acceptable to talk about it and yet it makes you a cool chick who supports men? Sounds like a contradiction
/r/MensRights22/03/20 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter