TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

simplepill Archive

View 3 posts and 54 comments by simplepill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think he's just trolling, look at his argument with redpillschool below.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:48 PM
1

According to whom? I don't think there's anything immoral about persuasion. Persuasion is not coercion. Nothing you've said actually gives any tangible reason for why morality doesn't apply to sex. He didn't say that actions themselves are above morality. He said that morality is relative and differs between people. Most people's morality systems are based on social contract. And that when deciding on your own actions, you do so through your own lens of morality. Did you read it at all?
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:48 PM
1

Man, he's right though, you didn't read his article did you?
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 04:46 PM
1

Glad to hear things are well!
/r/ThankTRP22/04/16 12:37 AM
1

Awesome!
/r/ThankTRP22/04/16 12:36 AM
3

So the problem I've noticed in Boston is higher bitch shields, less friendly women, frigid attitudes and a much tighter need for game. Also the train shuts down long before the bars do. Allston is a decent place to game, lots of college students there.
/r/GEOTRP12/01/15 07:24 PM
0

Yeah I mean she wakes up!
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:52 AM
6

It won't last. He'll beta up. She already senses it, why else is she here?
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:46 AM
-5

I'm very serious. After reading trp I know I don't have her attraction or she'd blow me. She doesn't. Should I dread game her?
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:45 AM
2

A 'truly red pill' woman needs a man to control her, so I see this post as an obvious example of that, and a real need to help her get her future husband into the roll of driver.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:38 AM
0

Why? It's a serious question facing my marriage. What do you do? She clearly doesn't respect me as captain.
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:35 AM
1

The advice here is quality, nobody needs you. OP here clearly just needs a way to get her man to start being alpha. Not a bad question!
/r/MarriedRedPill23/12/14 02:32 AM
-1

Have you tried /r/relationships ? They actually give really good perspective on this stuff.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/12/14 08:59 PM
-4

No way, compliance is key. It's important to convey to your wife that you understand your place in the social order: Grandparents (elders) -> Husband -> Wife -> Children.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/12/14 08:58 PM
1

I wrote a song like this for my woman, sang it at the wedding. She melted.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/12/14 08:56 PM
4

Another good tip I like to suggest is when she's around for the holidays you start calling MIL "boss" because it really appeals to her ego. Make sure to do it around your wife for extra brownie points.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/12/14 08:53 PM
3

Hey thanks for graphing these out. Looks awesome. Obviously the data doesn't support that guys are totally sexless, but I don't think it takes into account the work put in for the guys vs the girls. It does illustrate that girls either can't get sex at 30+ or don't know how to try. For guys, it could be 500% more difficult to get laid, but since they'll work for it, they'll do it, and the numbers look nice and even. It's also worth noting that this doesn't comment on number of partners either, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 04:13 PM
18

Maybe we should print out just a few more of those stats in a way that should give you some clearer info, shall we? How many single people are sexless... Ages 18-24: Men: 56.9% sexless Women: 50.8% sexless Ages 25-29: Men: 46% sexless Women: 43% sexless Ages 30-39: Men: 39.6% sexless Women: 72% sexless sexless sexless Holy shit- single men get laid more as they approach 40.. and single women get laid.. LESS? This is the SMV graph. This illustrates it perfectly. Women it the wall at breakneck spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/14 03:22 PM
0

By blue pill's definition, being sexist is misandry/misogyny and that does mean hate, which is a dislike for somebody. dislike men in groups discussing women. not just some men, all men if they dare discuss something she/he deems unworthy. Also, black people should avoid talking about white people too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 09:36 PM
1

He's wrong in that we could ever return to a christian form of morality. But even then I'm not convinced he thinks we could, I think he's still illustrating a point. It's the reason I don't like republicans. They have good points some times but really get there the wrong way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 09:27 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1nlpy8/why_are_bluepillers_so_quick_to_excuse_poor/cck7cqv?context=1 I, generally, dislike men in groups discussing women. I think it mostly creates discussions like those had at TRP, which is to say, largely bereft of positive content. On a personal level, some men are fine, some men are not. I am marginally sexist against men, though, that's true. We'll let your words do the talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 09:26 PM
3

I think it's dumb to use a different term. I think rape is rape. But again, I don't think red pillers are arguing that being raped by a date isn't rape, only that feminists are trying to blur the definition and move the posts on the term rape (by using new terms like date rape) to include things that simple do not compare at all to actual rape. Consider: Had sex buzzed with a dude, wake up next morning, regret it, claim rape-- vs -- man breaks into house and forcibly penetrates somebody while ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 09:24 PM
5

My understanding is this: RPS discussed the history of rape specifically in the case of marriage as being a crime against chastity, not a crime of consent, which meant that marital rape wasn't defined. He then goes on to say, but culturally most westernized cultures changed rape to be an issue of bodily autonomy. Which caused an issue since marital rape wasn't defined. So in the 1970s basically all states in the USA gave definition to marriage not to include perpetual consent for marriage. He th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 09:20 PM
1

I think it's pretty obvious, the author is conservative, likely religious, and is kind of nuts, but he really hits on a topic that dismisses feminism's approach to rape, which is why I think it's worth a read. Realize, of course, that it's not there to agree with everything but instead gain a perspective. He has some good points and some stupid ones. Some of his points show that he's severely out of touch with the way things are progressing. And some of his points are clearly hyperbole or illust…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 08:33 PM
0

That SUiP is suggesting that rape shouldn't be a crime. What it is saying is that awkward sex isn't rape. The same belief is described in their "required reading" in the sidebar where, in the "Sexual Utopia in Power" it suggests that date rape isn't real and instead of treating date rapists as criminals, their victims should just be forced to marry them so then everyone is happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 07:45 PM
0

I don't think most reasonable people disagree with me- I just can't figure out why MRSAMSA insists on repeating this known falsehood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 07:41 PM
1

According to you, my submission was both clear enough (thanks!), Your side-speak is incredible, but doesn't escape this dear reader. Your submission title was clear enough to show you wanted to link this anonymous comment with the return of king writing staff. and correct (thanks again!). Had the plausible deniability of being technically correct while still serving your purpose of making a link that didn't exist. I'll ask you again, though you'll just keep evading me: Why didn't you word it the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 07:38 PM
2

A yes or no will suffice. Come on, why are you evading the question? Do you think RPS is not in favor of raping women? Rape is rape, it's a simple question. Either he thinks rape is good, or he doesn't. He stated he doesn't think it's good. All you have to do is answer, Do you think RPS is not in favor of raping women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 07:00 PM
2

I don't want to debate it. I want to know, do you think RPS is not in favor of raping women? It's a simple question. In case you're wondering, RPS has stated that he does not think raping women is morally or legally ok, so we do know his position. My question is simple: Is he allowed to be anti-rape? Or is your (uninformed - you've never met him) opinion of what he does more important than his own stance on the topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:53 PM
6

I'm not the only one who notices. It's noble and helps make discussion move forward, but I think makes a consession few others are willing to make. I also notice /u/nicethingyoucanthave does this as well. It really gets on my nerves because it's basically one side demanding the other side be compliant or leave the discussion altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:39 PM
3

I realize that when I basically gave up on trying, my level of discourse dropped. I apologize that it happened, but I don't think I'm goign to be an isolated case
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:37 PM
1

I will edit
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:32 PM
5

I'm disappointed that blue pillers are abusing the opportunity by misquoting, quoting out of context, and generally ignoring the position red pillers take when formulating future arguments. I'm disappointed that there is no leader here enforcing people to a higher standard of discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:31 PM
2

Do you believe that /u/redpillschool is not in favor of raping women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:30 PM
3

It's not just an interpretation, Mrsamsa's is literally just out of context, like actually just drops paragraphs before hand to make his point. He was called out on it, and RPS said "he was describing awkward sex, not instances of real rape, and arguing against that definition of date rape." You wouldn't know that because mrsamsa conveniently continues to throw around the out-of-context version. Anyway, maybe you can't change that. People will be people. I'm just saying that it's absolutely poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:22 PM
1

It's an example of a particular behavior. It extends to many users. Let's look at MRSAMSA's sticking point that the red pill doesn't believe in date rape because of his misinterpretation of sexual utopia in power. I remember reading RPS explain what it meant (can't find it now), and yet, it's easier to win a debate by just "forgetting" the explanation (as what it means to red pillers) and keep repeating the easy-to-swallow line.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:11 PM
3

So your rebuttal to my point that shows your intentions is basically to ignore it. You don't get to end it by saying "the end." Can't close a case you opened. Why didn't you word it the way I did? Answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 06:04 PM
1

This is a difficult question that deserves it's own topic, but all I'm saying is that I've had many friends ruined by false rape or false abuse allegations, so it's a lot more common than you think. This is why the sexual utopia in power addressed it. Awkward sex isn't rape, it's awkward sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:55 PM
7

Listen, the first time soulcake brought up rape, maybe I'd agree with you. But soulcake has been trying to shoehorn rape into this debate since the subs inception. If you don't see this as disingenuous, then I simply cannot help you. Every time we come to the conclusion, "ok maybe they really didn't mean rape is good, I guess we just misinterpreted everything.." soulcake starts a new pro-rape debate as though we hadn't just settled it. This is a refusal to accept our position even exists as our …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:54 PM
5

Should not have assumed that "rape should not be a crime because it no longer causes the economic damage it once did. (17 upvotes, 1 down on TRP website Return of Kings)" doesn't mean it's a quote from return of kings... like everybody else understood? Like purplepillmod? Like saint morning mistook originally? No I think the meaning of your words were quite clear and were there to edge your side of the debate. I mean, let's think about it for a second... how strong would your argument have been …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:51 PM
3

It's an example of somebody trying to do regret-rape. You don't think many people try it, but I'm showing you just how much some women try to get away with in regret-rape world. Imagine if the video didn't exist. Do you really think he'd have gotten away with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:35 PM
4

Thanks for the demonstration. PPD is only unproductive for debate when you choose to make it unproductive for debate. Instead of asking for the source to confirm or whatever, you instead suggested it was similar to my writing--any reasonable person understands the implication here. Then, you got upset and ragequit the sub when I gave a reasoned argument in defense of myself. I wasn't doubting the source, I was explaining that it wasn't from a ROK author. It still isn't. And that's my point. It i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:33 PM
7

Ladies and gentlemen, my case in point exactly. Here you are arguing the semantics of whether saying "we got this from return of kings" implies that it was a blog post from return of kings verses a totally anonymous user comment... when just yesterday somebody decided that I suggested a massive blue pill conspiracy because I said two people have similar views. Pedantic when it helps you, and totally clueless when it doesn't. Clever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:30 PM
7

Then the debate will continue as it has been. Ancillary debates on semantics of wording and literal interpretations of out-of-context crap. Blue pillers skirting the line as close as they can by blatantly misrepresenting points as often as they can while claiming it was just a simple misunderstanding or that any commoner would easily confuse the true meaning. It will continue to be a debate that never touches on the spirit of red pill topics, but instead continues to slog forward on the semantic…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:28 PM
0

Wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:25 PM
3

I admitted that it's probably on there. Did you read my post? Of course you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:24 PM
1

https://pay.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1s8twu/i_believe_ppd_to_be_a_circlejerk_and_no_longer/cdv56rz
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:23 PM
4

Then you haven't spent much time on /r/mensrights . http://totalfratmove.com/public-oral-sex-at-ohio-university-blows-up-on-social-media-rape-alleged/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:23 PM
5

on TRP website Return of Kings This clearly implies it's an article, and that it reflects the opinion of return of kings. Go ahead and weasel out of it though. Let the pedantic argument commence. "But but but blue pill only takes things exactly literally. it was on return of kings, so what I said is technically correct!" You know exactly what you were doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:20 PM
5

Right, but that's not what sexual utopia in power was writing about, so it's very disingenuous to implicate that the red pill is for raping drunk girls because the article said a particular scenario being called date rape was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:13 PM
10

But that's not what we get. We get out-of-context quotes from the sidebar that distill things like sexual utopia in power into snippets like "date rape shouldn't be a crime and rape victims should be forced to marry" which ignores the spirit of the article and really the context. Until blue pillers pick up the responsibility of arguing with a little honor, I don't see how the quality of this discourse will improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 05:11 PM
9

I think one rule would have to be "no assertive statements about the other side's viewpoint." Instead, only questions about the other side's viewpoint or statements like "I read this and understand it to be xyz, is this a correct interpretation of what you wrote?" Cut out that.. "but you can't be anti rape when you're clearly a rapist!"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 04:52 PM
3

This is what we call just plain old rape. I understand the idea falls under the broad usage of the term "date rape" but it also includes women who drank too much and regret the night before, or just plain old sober regret-sex. Also, roofies are extremely uncommon. http://www.fdlreporter.com/article/20131127/FON0101/310280235/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 04:50 PM
11

it is up to the Red Pill to defend those claims. While this is true, it is also up to the group claiming the red pill is wrong to defend those claims. Believe it or not, claiming somebody is wrong is an assertion, and not the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis here would be "I don't think i've seen sufficient proof that it works," which can easily be argued against with- well the proof is in the pudding, seems that it's working for these guys. The blue pill hypothesis is that it's not just unp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/13 04:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter