TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sinfulcucumber Archive

View 0 posts and 301 comments by sinfulcucumber on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The fact you have to ask what inequalities women face in the West shows me that you aren’t looking to argue in good faith, especially when you claim that “nothing comes close to the injustices men face”. Nether-the-less, I’ll attempt to humour your ignorance. Systemic sexism presents itself in many ways, but the most common examples I can think of on the top of my head is normalised misogyny, whether it's through subconscious bias, or social norms. Society perceives men as the default in terms t…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 04:33 AM
0

It could be women raping other women, but I never made the claim that the perpetuators of rape in the NISVS survey are primarily men. Most male and female victims of rape report their perpetuator as male. Your same source that you’ve cited states the following: 87% of male victims of (completed or attempted) rape reported only male perpetrators. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html Your link to r/leftwingadvocates is broken, but I’ve already pr…
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/21 10:34 AM
1

The label ‘egalitarianism’ is in advocation for equality, but the subreddit is not. The label is coined as a dog-whistle approach for men and anti-feminists to congregate together in reactionary response to feminism. It’s a hostile environment for women. Look at the side bar and the top posts of r/Egalitarianism. Most – if not all – of the hot posts are about men’s rights. They have no mentioning of women’s rights or the oppression and inequality that women face. On the side bar it provides reso…
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/21 03:13 AM
0

The most common issue presented by men’s rights activists in response to the 1 in 4 CDC statistic is that Mary Koss does not believe men can be raped by women. The quote often used is displayed below: Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman. T…
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 04:52 AM
1

Citation needed.
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 03:57 AM
1

Did you completely ignore everything of which I just said? Quotas don’t prioritise the “less-qualified” candidate. They prioritise the underrepresented candidate. For example, if you have a black man and a white man with the exact same qualifications, experience, work ethic, and educational backgrounds, the quota will ensure that the black man will be prioritised. Your argument relies on the insinuation that more white men will be hired than black men because marginalised groups are less capable…
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 10:17 AM
1

The bible does not speak on abortion. There are only two scriptures that briefly mention abortion, but it’s not equivalent to the care that people receive today. The reason I provided you with that verse is to highlight to you that the bible is outdated, contradictory, and shouldn’t be applied to the modern world. The numbers you provided me endorse slavery, violence, and murder. This is an astute example of the contradictions presented in the bible. God is pro-choice (Moses 3:17), instructs abo…
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 08:08 AM
-1

Are you seriously claiming that schools and sports are “men’s spaces”?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 06:03 AM
-2

You do realise the same study you’re citing from the CDC is designed by a feminist, right? Or are feminists only citing “anti-male propaganda” when it doesn’t pertain to your agenda? The CDC study is based on the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey in 2011 — a survey designed by a feminist. The table you’re referencing is highly misleading because it doesn’t include more than half of its data to determine the full accuracy of male and female rape victims within the 12-month peri…
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 06:00 AM
1

Consent to sex is not consent to forced pregnancy or childbirth. Understanding that there’s a risk to an action isn’t the same as consenting to that risk. For example, if I were to drive a car, I am acknowledging that I could potentially be crashed into by another car, but I am not consenting to that happening, and the hospital cannot refuse me medical service as a result. You are blatantly dismissing all reproductive rights when you claim that a woman consents to pregnancy each time she engages…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 10:32 AM
2

Egalitarian nowadays is just another term for “men’s rights”.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 09:33 AM
1

The point of this excerpt is to prove to you that any religious “morals” that you inherit are contradictory. God is pro-choice.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:24 AM
1

I agree that equal opportunity does not always lead to equal outcome, however, inequality, by definition, mean a difference in size, degree, or circumstance. There is a lack of equality in leadership roles. Your stance from the beginning has been insistent on placing liability on a woman for equal irresponsibility of actions. I’m not putting words into your mouth. If both partners are irresponsible with their actions, the repercussions shouldn’t fall solely onto the woman. Women cannot have care…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:23 AM
1

This comment – like a lot of your comments – tells me that you haven’t put in the minimal amount of effort to research this topic, despite I’ve provided you with the statistics in a comprehensive manner. Majority of women who terminate their pregnancy report using some form of contraception. I’m unsure why you’re using an outlier to justify a blanket ban on abortion. Even the women who do engage in sexual intercourse with contraception still require abortions, regardless of what you’ve been fals…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:23 AM
1

The idea that women seek abortions for sport is one of the most unconscionably ignorant claims that I have been subjected to in my entire existence of engaging in discourse with pro-life individuals. I am genuinely curious as to where you develop such erroneous bigotry. Your lack of nuance here is perverse, and your observation is myopic to the point I’m trying to convey, but it’s self-evident that you lack the knowledge to be speaking so confidently on a topic you know nothing about. What you a…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:21 AM
1

Women aren’t voluntarily placing a “human being” inside of their womb. This insinuates that accidental pregnancies do not exist, and I assume you also advocate for abstinence? I’m going to say this now: consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy. A woman should have the right to engage in the same sexual activities as a man without being forced to give birth against her will. Your individual morals are not other’s responsibilities. The idea that a fetus is inherently valuable because it is a hum…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:21 AM
1

5:18-29 The Test of the Unfaithful Wife ”May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.” ”If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:09 AM
1

Ever read a religious text? Yes, I have. I find this one in particular quite interesting. 5:18-29 The Test of the Unfaithful Wife ”May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.” ”If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will bec…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 03:02 AM
1

I believe that your incentive to the abortion debate is disingenuous and your belief that women should be punished for engaging in irresponsible sex is misogynistic. It places responsibility of the actions onto a woman and absolves men from their equal participation. Childbirth should not be weaponised as a form of punishment leveraged over women and girls. A child should not be used as a weapon within a dispute of responsibility, because not only is that woman’s life drastically effected, but s…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:51 AM
1

My stance from the beginning is that both genders should be held accountable for their decision-making. A woman shouldn’t be blamed for engaging in sexual intercourse with an irresponsible man, neither should a man be blamed for engaging in sexual intercourse with an irresponsible woman. They are both of equal irresponsibility. The presumption that a man gets blamed for every decision is false. Women are the primary sex that are shunned and ostracised by society for engaging in sexual intercours…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:31 AM
1

Do you understand what inequality means? It means a difference in size, degree, circumstances, etc; lack of equality. Women make up less than 15-20% of leadership positions and governing positions in parliament. I’m not dismissing any of your points. I’m insisting that it takes two to tango, and both partners make a conscious decision to engage in sexual intercourse that could potentially result in conception. You seem to be the one that’s insistent on the idea that a man should have no liabilit…
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 02:19 AM
3

I agree with u/acornfroggie. Im 20 F and the primary women who tend to be against age gaps are women around my age. Occasionally you’ll get the older woman, but I don’t see it often.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 12:34 PM
0

It’s not sexist. Women shouldn’t be making decisions on men’s bodies, either. Example A: male circumcision.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 11:37 AM
0

You made a public post. Expect a public response. It’s common sense, really.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 11:36 AM
0

Your views on abortion are those equivalent to the propaganda disseminated by the pro-life movement. They are not genuine. You are approaching the topic with a black and white view. This idea that women are “irresponsible” and need to be held accountable for their actions and discouraged from engaging in sexual intercourse is not only incredibly misogynistic, but it’s also a perfect example of psychotic puritanism and strict policing over women’s bodies. Majority of women who terminate their pre…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:59 AM
2

Ah yes, the pro-lifer claiming everyone else is morally bankrupt while simultaneously not giving a shit about that human life once it’s outside of the womb. You have zero empathy and compassion for human beings that aren’t a cellular organism residing in another person’s body.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:18 AM
1

I hope you realise that pro-life incentives lead to overall more abortions and more deaths, right? Or did someone not do their research before they spoke with such misplaced confidence.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:12 AM
3

Why do you believe a ZEF that isn't established as an individual person is more deserving of human rights that no human being in this country has? No one has the right to life at the expense of another person's bodily autonomy. Pregnancy and childbirth is extremely hard on women, affects their body drastically, and is very painful. As a man, why do you believe you should force a woman through a risky, intrusive, and life-changing procedure based on your subjective moral values that you place on …
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:04 AM
2

Men have the right to prevent an unintended pregnancy by 1) practicing abstinence; 2) using male contraception and; 3) choosing who they engage in sexual intercourse with. If the woman decides to keep the child, you have the option to 1) walk away from the pregnancy; 2) waiver your guardianship and; 3) terminate your parental rights. There is no law that mandates you to pay for the abortion or the childbirth fees. Women aren’t the one’s lacking the accountability here. Women have more responsibi…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 10:02 AM
1

It’s interesting how you claim that women lack accountability in all areas in life, and then lead off onto this misogynistic rant excusing the inequality that women face in the workforce, and still continue to lack the self-awareness and discernment to recognise your blatant dismissal of a man’s accountability to his actions by conveniently excusing his lack of responsibilities for his poor choices by deflecting onto this idea that a woman has full control of the sexual marketplace. You’re corre…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:46 AM
2

The pro-life incentive stems from psycho puritanism. I read a well-detailed post here which provides the origins of the pro-life unification in the US. I suggest reading it.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:52 AM
-1

I agree. If you lack a uterus, you shouldn’t be advocating for laws that don’t affect you.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:34 AM
1

Majority of women who terminate their pregnancy report using some form of contraception. Stop disseminating blatant fabrications about women and their rights. Also, the bible literally encourages women to seek abortions.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:33 AM
2

Saying pro-life people are trying to control others is like saying people who support murder, assault, drink driving etc laws are just trying to control the people who commit those crimes. That would be a plausible argument if women who seek abortions are committing a crime. Except they aren’t. Facts don’t care about your feelings. Pro-choice individuals want others to have control over their own lives, correct. Most people agree. Pro-life individuals want to have control other other’s lives. Th…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:32 AM
1

You say this, meanwhile men avoid all accountability when it comes to the abortion debate. 52% of men don’t even pay a single penny in child support, and you want to argue that women are the ones lacking accountability for their actions despite making up 80% of single mothers? You’re a bigot, and a biased one at that.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:30 AM
1

Before I begin my premise, allow me to start by saying that pregnancy is not an inconvenience. Missing the bus is an inconvenience. Pregnancy is intrusive, risky, and life-changing. It’s a very simple moral issue. No human being has the right to life at an expense of another person’s bodily autonomy. There is no circumstance outside of pregnancy where a person is legally allowed to impose on a person’s bodily autonomy against their will. Given by the deplorable way you speak about these same hum…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:28 AM
1

It’s not a woman’s choice to “give their children the death penalty”. These are play-on words with the intended result of sensationalism. They are meaningless, and it's futile to use colloquial terms to argue your point. The idea that women “choose” to engage in irresponsible sex is a myth perpetuated by the pro-life community to condemn women for exercising their human rights. Majority of women who terminate their pregnancy report using some form of contraception. Additionally, your statement “…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 08:24 AM
1

Your statement is contradictory. Pro-life is, in reality, “anti-choice”. You’re the one who’s against peoples choices, not feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 07:59 AM
-1

Quotas for the gender that gets pregnant – you know, the same gender employers discriminate against in concern that they’ll take too many sick days due to their period and the same gender employers discriminate against in concern that they’ll become pregnant and require time off, even if they don’t necessarily want to start a family in the near future. What your comment tells me – like most of the word vomit you tend to spew around here – is that you have no fucking idea what the fuck you’re tal…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 05:10 AM
1

You’re justifying women being “treated like crap” based on something they shouldn’t be treated like crap for.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:32 AM
1

I bet you do. However, I do remember statitics saying women are more interested in marriage than men are now. It’s the complete opposite. Marriage benefits men more than it benefits women. https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/men-and-marriage-research-brief.pdf
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:32 AM
1

You made a comparison between the two. It’s called a false equivalency. Look it up.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 02:27 AM
0

It’s a generalisation. If you weren’t socially inept, you’d be able to decipher the context by now. By superficial standards, I mean expecting your partner to be a virgin throughout their entire adulthood just because you can’t get laid.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:44 AM
1

You know what, you’re 100% right. Objectifying women and placing value on their bodies definitely isn’t shameful behaviour, neither is it misogynistic. The quotes below aren’t shaming women either: “When a woman slept with somebody, she lowered her value before” “It is not my fault you can’t kept your legs close.” “It is our opinion to dislike and disencourage other people from going down a shithole.” “Remember, men have no shortage because most women are cheap sell outs.” “A man gain respect an…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:42 AM
1

Ah yes, because a woman having a high body count is comparable to a man abusing multiple women. You are delusional.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:36 AM
1

Yeah, buddy. I can guarantee you’re the only one here that’ll end up depressed and alone.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 01:34 AM
0

Where does he say that? Because this entire times he’s been using whataboutism to justify shaming women for having a body count higher than two.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 12:02 AM
0

I would, but I never made that claim.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 12:01 AM
1

What you are describing discriminates against Title VII and is the reason why quotas exist.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 11:18 PM
1

I’m confused here. Are you claiming it should be legal to discriminate against pregnant mothers in the workplace?
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 08:02 AM
1

The references are embedded in the article. I’m not too sure what you’re referring to.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 07:33 AM
1

That’s a lot of words for: ”I like to shame women for engaging in the same human behaviours as men”. This isn’t human nature – it's sociological. Women care just as much if a man has a high body count as a man cares about a woman who has a high body count. The only difference is that we don’t shame men for it. Scientific studies show that both men and women who have high body counts have the same inability to “pair bond”, the same risk of marital failure, the same risk of unhappiness, and the sa…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 07:23 AM
1

Women don’t initiate divorce for “no reason”. I’m unsure where you’re getting your information from, but it’s wrong. There is always a reason for an action. People don’t commit actions, especially detrimental and burdening actions, for no reason. You sound quite young and completely oblivious to how the world works. I would also encourage you to do some independent research on how common alimony and child support is. Alimony is extremely rare and 52% of fathers do not pay a single penny in child…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 07:17 AM
1

Again, there’s a difference between a preference and shaming those who don’t fit your preferences. You seem to struggle differentiating between the two. I don’t like men with high body counts, either. But I don’t shame them for it.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:42 AM
0

It is human nature to have an opinion, dislike and reject. I never said it wasn’t. Read again. It is not my fault you can't kept your legs close. I can keep my legs closed. It’s not my fault you’re insecure about women with more experience in the bedroom than you.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:41 AM
1

Again, having a preference is fine. Shaming women for not meeting your preferences is not fine. If women were actively encouraging other women not to date short men with small penises, you’d be screaming “misandry”.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 05:40 AM
1

Nice, comparing infidelity statistics to rape statistics. Do you know how they accurately figure out how many women are raped? Through the same studies I just provided you with. You are pathologically stupid. I took one look at your comment history and the amount of time you spend berating women is genuinely concerning. Why don’t you worry about keeping your infinitesimal penis in your pants and stop harassing women who wouldn’t sleep with you in the first place? Jesus Christ. There’s a forum fo…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 02:51 AM
1

Disliking women with high body counts: fine. Shaming women for having high body counts: not fine. That’s the fundamental difference between the two.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 02:16 AM
1

When your opinion shames others, then yes, it is a shame tactic.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 02:10 AM
1

I genuinely couldn’t care less. It’s just hilarious how out of all the things you could’ve insulted me for, you chose to call me a “slut”. It’s the most generic playground insult.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:59 AM
1

There’s a difference between having a preference and shaming those who don’t suit your superficial criteria. Anyone who believes more than two body counts is “a lot” is very likely a teenager.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:56 AM
1

Do you guys ever get tired of calling any woman who doesn’t pertain to your shameful bias as a “slut”? Find something original.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:52 AM
1

r/incels
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:48 AM
1

And I can pull up just as many studies countering that. I’m waiting.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:17 AM
1

Firstly, i never said ALL women wear it for male attention many do. Sure, buddy. “And yes male attention is insanely important to women. Who wear makeup and dresses nice and sexy? Women do. In general are concerned about looks. Its 100% for male attention.” And second, i got you here, that statement i made is not transphobic. I disagree. It was a very naive blanket statement to differentiate between transgender women and cis women. Either way, it was completely false. If it wasn’t false, then we…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 01:13 AM
1

I’ll address a few points here, since you seem to be misrepresenting a few. You’re conflating the initiation of a divorce for the cause of a divorce. If a woman initiates a divorce based on the action her husband made, for example, he was unfaithful to her, then she is not the reason why the divorce occurred, she is the reason why the divorce initiated. The husband is the cause of the divorce and if he hadn’t cheated, there would be no reason for the wife to divorce him. The primary reason that …
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:58 AM
0

Ah yes, the classic “if the studies don’t align with my views that means they’re wrong and the other side is heavily under-reported despite having no evidence of this”. If you’re going to make a baseless assertion, you’re going to have to try better than weaponising an anecdotal experience that is likely completely fabricated. In all honesty, you just sound like you hate women. Either that, or you have a terrible history with them. But I’m going to assume it’s the first option since you’re on Re…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:43 AM
0

I’m just going to repeat a few of my points below. What we are saying is men can still have children age 40 + but women at that age is basically barren and the decline happens like from age 27 + The men who have children at this age are outliers, as illustrated in a previous comment. Women can also have children at those ages, too. My Auntie just recently gave birth to a baby girl at 41 and my mother had two girls in her mid to late 40’s. A woman’s fertility only begins to decrease gradually at …
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:38 AM
1

If you want to engage in a rational discussion, please get rid of the obnoxious petty remarks spaced between each comment. It’s not providing your argument with much merit. It doesn’t decrease to ZERO like it doesn’t with the vast majority of women. The point I’m trying to make is that men and women have the same biological timeclock. Our fertility doesn’t rapidly drop to zero as we hit 35. It gradually decreases until becomes increasingly difficult to reproduce. As women reach the age of 45-50,…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:30 AM
1

What an uncalibrated comment. I’m certain if I challenge you to a debate with succint comments you would back out because its easier to just name call then make a reasonable point. Anonymous accounts are the online embodiment of outcasts who wear paper bags over their heads because they’re too ugly to exist in society. Come back to me when you can introduce your mug head to everyone else, incel. Also, I know this comment made you seethe, but you don’t need to spam me with your petulant remarks.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:23 AM
0

Nope, it’s the same for men and women, except men are more likely to cheat. Source: https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:19 AM
0

It’s not human nature to shame women for engaging in a natural biological function. It’s your psychotic puritanism, aka anti-freedom. The only thing this shame tactic resorts to is women lying about their body count to avoid confrontation from impotent men projecting their sexual frustrations onto everyone else. I’ve never made a plus size campaign, either.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:17 AM
0

Extra context: Men and women are not the same. Women don’t shame and objectify men for superficial standards, while men do.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:15 AM
-1

Women with a body count more than two are abnormal now? You sound about 14 years old from the way you talk about the opposite sex.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:14 AM
0

You’re sitting here pretending like men don’t shame women for starfish sex, lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:12 AM
0

u/levis-side-thot is right. You sound like a young teenager who’s still stuck in that “edgy phase” and has no idea what the fuck they’re talking about. Like seriously? “Take the L. Loser”? You couldn’t sound more petulant than that. This idea that only transgender women use make-up for creativity is not only transphobic because you’re insinuating transgender women differ from biological women, but it’s also objectively false. Source: Abby Roberts, Charlotte Roberts, Courtney Jade, Mikayala Nogue…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/21 12:11 AM
0

The amount of bitter sexism in one comment is absolutely deplorable. Please seek therapy. I’m genuinely concerned for your mental well-being.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:53 PM
0

Sorry, but you’ve been spreading a bunch of bullshit all across this comment thread. Your anti-feminist buddies may be gullible enough to believe it, but the ones with critical thinking skills won’t. Men’s fertility decreases as they age. - The idea that robust fertility for a man will continue well past a woman’s decline in fertility is untrue. (Abstract paragraph 3) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253726/ Men’s sperm quality decreases as they age. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › p…
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:49 PM
0

Found the bitter incel.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:47 PM
1

Actually, a higher body count results in high divorce for both men and women. Men are actually more likely to cheat than women, too. Sources: https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:45 PM
-3

Ability to pair bond is based on biased male pseudoscience. There is no concrete evidence that a higher body count leads to a reduced faithfulness during marriage. Furthermore, this same logic would apply to men with high body counts, regardless of whether they have to “put in more work” to get laid.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:42 PM
0

I don’t understand this psychotic puritanism placed on women’s bodies and the desire to objectify and control what occurs in a woman’s private life.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:40 PM
7

Yikes..
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:39 PM
0

Is this r/antifeminists or r/incels?
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 11:37 PM
1

I agree with the 30-35% figure – you have 40 yo men like Ryan Reynolds and Jake Gyllenhaal who still look to be in their late 20’s. But it’s interesting that you claim that there are 15-20% of women actively seeking older men, when the same studies red-pillers so often rely on for their own confirmation bias cite that only 1-5% of women date men 10-15 years out of their age range. I think when women say they like older men, they generally mean 5-10 years older, but a lot of red-pillers mistake t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 12:09 AM
-1

Yeah, it’s concerning how they conveniently leave out a large chunk of the study that doesn’t pertain to their bias.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 04:50 PM
1

Abortion is an alternative to pregnancy and childbirth. Alleviation of parenthood is only an additional benefit. Abortion has and will always be an issue of bodily autonomy. A man has the right to waiver his parental rights through the court system. It’s easier to do if he refuses to sign the birth certificate and terminates his rights earlier on. But I agree, financial abortion should also be an option.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 04:36 PM
1

They aren’t going to like this one.
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 04:33 PM
3

Stay off FDS From the same study OP quoted: “But there are a few interesting phenomena. For one, men on the site tend to be more generous than women when it comes to rating attractiveness, leading to a nice bell curve with the bulk of ratings falling around ‘average’. But despite their fair ratings, they tend to ignore many of the women they find reasonably attractive and primarily target the most attractive females.“As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as wors…
/r/AntiFeminists07/11/21 04:32 PM
1

Ah, yes, I forget that men’s choice to work in more dangerous careers is a form of anti-male hatred and not the amount of misogyny present within women’s everyday lives that result in women being killed due to domestic homicide, honour killings, and other terrorist attacks. women earn less Men: it’s because of choice. men choose dangerous careers that pay more Men: it’s because we’re oppressed and society is anti-male. MGTOW’s aren’t bad because they’re going their own way. MGTOW’s are bad becau…
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 08:48 PM
0

It’s not a concession, I just realised that I’m talking to a brick wall and there’s no hopes for a discussion of genuine intellect when you have justified: 1) The idea that domestic violence is a normal response for men to instigate in defence of a society that they deem as ‘anti-male’. 2) Every law as a result of men’s rights activism that has had to be deconstructed within not even half a decade because they have resulted in a significant increase of violence, injury, and deaths due to family …
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 12:05 PM
1

That’s quite literally my point, but I appreciate you recognising the contradiction between the two. Also, only 4% of custody disputes go to trial in family court.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 11:19 AM
1

Women make less money Men: “it’s because of choice” Men make up less college degrees, less likely to have custody, affected by divorce rates, and choose more dangerous careers Men: “it’s because we’re oppressed”
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 10:44 AM
1

Defunded because men don’t use them. Example A: Erin Pizzey.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 09:41 AM
1

We have had three mass shootings against women in one year alone and you’re claiming the world is GROSSLY anti-male? No idea what the rest of your word vomit is on about.
/r/AntiFeminists06/11/21 09:38 AM
0

MGTOW’s have congregated to subs like r/mensrights and r/whereareallthegoodmen, and they are very anti-female.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:28 PM
0

Just because I’m engaging with an incel on there, that doesn’t mean I condone the subreddit. Am I against feminism because I’m engaging in this subreddit?
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:25 PM
1

This guy is trolling you lmao
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 02:59 PM
1

And no, abortion laws do not oppress women. Nobody is being oppressed by standing up and finally saying “we’re not going to let you kill your children without consequence anymore” Most scientists agree that biological life begins at conception, which is a misleading representation of the question. Biological life exists, this does not justify anti-abortion laws. When you are forcing a woman to give birth against her will, you are oppressing her fundamental human rights to liberty, privacy, and h…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 02:47 PM
1

Thank you for pointing out that I need professional help based on my observations of MGTOW. Very insightful.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 01:28 PM
-2

Because I am aware of the criticisms of feminism, and I am also aware of the hypocrisy of men’s rights activists when they believe they are in the position to criticise feminism of actions that their movement is equally guilty of. Men’s rights activists don’t want equality, we see that over and over again. Members of your hate cult are famous for your propensity to cherry-pick: demanding equal custody without working to advocate to dismantle societal norms that they uphold and their reluctancy t…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 12:22 PM
-1

You’re literally an MRA justifying theft and fraud. You’re a lost cause. Sorry, there’s no point engaging with you or reading your wall of text that I can strongly predict consists of a bunch of hypocritical diatribes against feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 11:59 AM
1

How? 💀
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 11:33 AM
1

r/againstmensrights ≠ r/Mensrights r/antifeminists ≠ r/feminism
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 11:16 AM
1

Proof of what?
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:56 AM
0

Men’s liberation doesn’t ignore any of men’s issues, they’re just not anti-feminist. That’s why I suggested for her to join r/menslib, as it includes both of her ideological views.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:53 AM
0

Said by the anti-feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:44 AM
3

That’s how I roll
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 09:25 AM
-1

Oh fuck off you meninist. No one cares about your hateful rhetoric. We get it. Feminists are evil monsters that are consistently lying and men are the true victims of an anti-male society and can do no wrong in the eyes of MRA’s. Jesus Christ. Do you guys ever come up with anything new to say instead of accusing everyone who doesn’t pertain to your bias as a feminist? Here are those statistics on divorce figures, by the way: https://farzadlaw.com/divorce-statistics But yes, you’re right. I’m def…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 06:33 AM
-1

The weaponisation of mental gymnastics in an attempt to justify the poor and misleading actions of the men’s rights communities and their activism throughout Australia makes it transparently clear that you’re a bigoted partisan of a pernicious rhetoric disseminated by a bunch of armchair advocates. MRA’s committed fraud and stole funds from a domestic violence support centre and allocated them to a notoriously misogynistic website that incites violence against women, while simultaneously corrupt…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 06:28 AM
0

I agree, it is hilarious, which is why it’s a satirical take of his dogmatism displayed above. You walked straight into the point and still missed it.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:32 AM
1

Do you have any evidence to support your claims that the poverty line is methodologically flawed?
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:31 AM
1

so who is then, let me guess men ?, of course, you are a feminist ideologue so that's a yes. I never made that claim. brothels are not shelters and such women are not homeless, i have no doubt survival sex is horrible but is a lot better than being a homeless garbage collector/street sleeper, you claim women are not more privileged than men yet you are admitting to me, women have more options to avoid homelessness ?. The reason they aren’t “homeless” is because they engage in survival sex for sh…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:28 AM
-2

I agree, which is why your original statement is utter and complete bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:04 AM
1

It’s unconstitutional. You can’t force men to provide the government with their DNA as it directly conflicts with their right to liberty and the 14th amendment, and I can assure you more men would oppose this law than stand for it for the comfort of a man’s feelings.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 05:03 AM
0

Men’s rights organisation sets up a fraudulent website of White Ribbon Australia — an organisation that provides services and resources to victims of domestic abuse — in an attempt to reallocate donated funds to A Voice for Men and disseminate misinformation on domestic violence rates that predominately affect women. Source Studies of men's rights groups in Australia have documented ways in which the movement has influenced changes in family law which privilege parental contact over safety, part…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 04:47 AM
1

Not in Australia, where OP is from… 1) Single fathers are provided with the same amount of financial subsidy payments based on individual income, including family tax benefits and child care subsidy. https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/individuals/services/centrelink/parenting-payment https://www.csmc.org.au/information-referrals/centrelink-and-government-payments/ 2) Single fathers are provided with education subsidies for their child. https://www.amp.com.au/insights/manage-my-money/back-to-sc…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:52 AM
1

That’s my point. But do you know what’s more unsafe? Being on the streets as a vulnerable woman.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:50 AM
1

I have no idea what you’re on about or who you’re quoting.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:49 AM
1

No, I’m saying that women aren’t the privileged gender and there is more nuance than proposed. For example, homeless women are more likely to engage in “survival sex” which provides them with temporary shelter, and women are more likely to have access to domestic violence shelters because they’re more likely to be abused on the streets than men. In what regard is this a form of privilege? If the poverty line is flawed, then the poverty line is flawed, not the demographics of people recorded unde…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:48 AM
0

Women are sexually assaulted or abused by other men on the streets or male volunteers from the refuge. https://vawnet.org/material/no-safe-place-sexual-assault-lives-homeless-women
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:44 AM
-2

Here is my humble opinion - Feminists advocates those, whose basic human rights have been denied just because they are women. They are not against men or men’s rights or anything for that matter. They just want justice for women whose basic human rights have been denied on gender grounds. For example, abortion rights, pink tax, medical disparity, hiring discrimination, domestic violence, and rape. Feminism is against this type of gender bias. There are many more issues that women suffer. I just …
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 03:41 AM
1

Really? Well why has the subreddit been banned then if hate subs against men are acceptable?
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 02:57 AM
1

Again, the comparison you are making is incredibly vacuous. The reason the r/againstmensrights subreddit exists isn’t because it’s against men’s rights, it’s because it’s against the r/mensrights subreddit, otherwise known as the men’s rights movement, which is the opposing side of feminism. You already have the equivalent of r/againstmensrights... and it’s called r/antifeminists. It’s just a difference in the name for both movements. If the men’s rights movement was renamed to “meninism”, the s…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 02:27 AM
1

Because r/againstmensrights isn’t against men’s rights.. it’s against the MRM community. You are literally participating in an anti-feminist subreddit. You cannot be that dense.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 02:16 AM
-2

What social safety nets do women have that men don’t? Aside from domestic abuse shelters, that’s the only thing I can think of, and a lot of the times the women are assaulted or abused in these centres. Hardly a “safety” net.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 01:53 AM
0

Wait until you hear about the MRA’s of Australia.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 01:45 AM
-1

Yes, you’re right. Homelessness definitely defines oppression despite women more likely to be suffering below the poverty line than men. /s
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 01:44 AM
0

Yeah, the men’s rights movement definitely isn’t anti-women when the world’s largest MRA gathering consisted of hateful diatribes against women with Paul Elam, one of the most prolific men’s rights activist, being met with applause for describing women as “opportunistic parasites in the lives of men” and Straughan saying “women need to give up their privileges and take up their obligation to men”. The same movement that carries the name of Paul Elam and Warren Farrell as a front-banner of their …
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 01:39 AM
0

Your criticism of feminism would apply to men’s rights, too.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 12:50 AM
1

You’re not going to get a genuine answer in a subreddit that’s literally against feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 12:47 AM
1

No, I don’t believe women are the only victims. My issue is with the lax insinuation that women are always believed when they are victims of sexual violence when this couldn’t be further from the truth. Are women taken more seriously than men? Likely. Are they believed more than men? According to my data, women are always manipulative liars that will falsely accuse men of abuse and rape for attention or to ruin his life. As we are diverging to a society where men are encouraged to speak up about…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 12:21 AM
1

I would say abortion laws are a big one.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 11:49 PM
1

That’s my point… victims of sexual violence as a whole are treated with a lack of seriousness. There’s no hypocrisy in my comment. These are statistical polls, which you seem to think your personal experiences outweigh the credibility of the consensus of the general public.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 11:45 PM
0

On a usual scale women will be listened to but men would be told to shut the fuck up and grow up... Meaning bottle it up and if you die or it leaks out it leaks out it is your fault and we don't care. This guy is a cuck but.. do you realise just how many times women are disbelieved and accused of lying about their experiences? The grass is always greener on the other side. A national survey conducted that close to half of all people believe that women are lying about their experiences of sexual …
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:38 PM
1

It’s available in all 50 states.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:35 PM
-4

All except for one are related to the US and fairly recent, but nice dismissal of sources. When was the white feather again? In the year 1914? Lmao, you’re such a hypocrite dude
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:34 PM
1

No, if she doesn’t consent he can get a court order. It is his right to establish paternity.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:32 PM
1

Men already have the right to a paternity test. It’s just not mandatory for those who don’t want it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:27 PM
-1

Weren’t they also the ones fighting against selective service for men and also fighting to include women in conscription law? But yeah, you’re right. A few bad apples = feminism bad. History of feminism opposing selective service in the US dates back to 1917 when the Conscription Act was passed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_States#Opposition Feminist organisation The National Organisation for Women opposes the draft and advocates to include women in conscription law. …
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:22 PM
4

Dude you’re a fucking cuck.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:11 PM
-4

Weren’t feminists the one that campaigned for the 2013 military combat law, though?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:11 PM
2

Cuck
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:10 PM
1

How?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:09 PM
1

I agree it should be taken down, but they were not of the same content at all. The anti-w0man sub was up for days before it was banned.. and it was literally posting content and videos of women being murdered and rape. The anti-m3n sub literally only has one photo of a chair.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:05 PM
1

The subreddit was in response to this anti-w0man subreddit. It’s just mimicking the same content to piss off the incels. The anti-w0man sub was up for days before it was banned.. and it was literally posting content and videos of women being murdered and rape. The anti-m3n sub literally only has one photo of a chair. u/anonymouslionn
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:04 PM
1

The anti-w0man sub was up for days before it was banned.. and it was literally posting content and videos of women being murdered and rape. Why would you want that up?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:03 PM
1

There was another anti-male sub that got banned straight away. Quit with the “rEdDiT wOkE sO rEdDiT aLLoW FeMaLe pRiViLeGe” bullshit. The anti-w0man sub was up for days before it was banned.. and it was literally posting content and videos of women being murdered and rape. The anti-m3n sub literally only has one photo of a chair.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:02 PM
0

The forum outside of reddit. Yeah and FDS only talks about “relationship red flags” and the “dangers of marriage” too lmao
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 09:58 PM
1

Because the only reason he wants to be “secure” is because he suspects me of cheating. There should be no reason to need a paternity test unless you believe I’ve been unfaithful, and it seems more-so an irrational fear at the back of the mind. If I remain faithful to you and love you enough to want to bring a whole child into this world and start a family with you, carrying that child for 9 months, and being in pain for 14-24 hours to bring new life into this world and you request a paternity te…
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:14 PM
-2

The entire content of MGTOW was hatred towards women. Even the MGTOW forum is nothing but women. Every single MGTOW I’ve come across has an entire comment history full of calling women narcissistic, toxic, cheating whores and encouraging men to not get married and to also go their own way. That’s what’s ironic about the title. It’s supposed to be “men going their own way”, but in reality, it’s just men revolving their entire lives around women. You’re a man going your own way yet you spend your …
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:03 PM
1

The entire content of MGTOW was hatred towards women. Even the MGTOW forum is nothing but women. Every single MGTOW I’ve come across has an entire comment history full of calling women narcissistic, toxic, cheating whores and encouraging men to not get married and to also go their own way. That’s what’s ironic about the title. It’s supposed to be “men going their own way”, but in reality, it’s just men revolving their entire lives around women.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:02 PM
1

Yeah, that was my point to the guy.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 08:00 PM
1

Fucking thank you!!!
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:59 PM
1

It’ll never happen. Waste of tax money for a bunch of insecure men reproducing with women they don’t see as faithful and it’s a violation of constitutional rights.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:59 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:58 PM
1

Why have you repeated the same response twice? I saw it the first time.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:58 PM
0

I’m not offended for this guy, I would be offended if my partner was basically accusing me of cheating, yes. That’s a normal response, and gaslighting me won’t change how I would feel about the lack of trust my significant other has for me. If you genuinely have so much mistrust for your partner that you believe she would cheat on you without suspicion of such, maybe you shouldn’t be reproducing with her. How common do you think paternity tests are?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:57 PM
1

Well duh.. of course she would be offended. A minority of men who have some serious trust issues doesn’t justify mandating a law that is unconstitutional, though. Have you even thought this through?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:55 PM
1

Whataboutism but.. where has FDS incited violence and rape towards men? Not condoning it, but the red pill is basically the male version of FDS, and that hasn’t been banned.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:53 PM
1

How is it hypocritical? It’s pro-choice to be against mandatory paternity tests, not the opposite.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:33 PM
1

That subreddit was made in response to anti-w0man. You do realise that, right? It’s not even real and they don’t post ANYWHERE close to the stuff on the anti-women subreddits, because these women don’t really hate men.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 06:41 PM
1

Okay, do you know if you can report them for a “cyber crime”? They were posting videos and photos of girls being raped and murdered. I found his Instagram.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 06:25 PM
1

Thank you. He’ll just make another one, though. He’s been doing it all day. How do you get them banned?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 06:10 PM
-1

Take your incel fantasies elsewhere.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:26 AM
1

No one cares that you dedicate your life to hating on women. Jesus Christ. Fuck off
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:24 AM
-5

Jesus Christ, the amount of weaponised ignorance and hostility here is obnoxious. You are fully aware that the primary reason why all these men want paternity tests is so that they can ensure that the child is theirs due to infidelity. If you disagree, just look at the abundance of men within this comment section complaining about the idea that possibility that they are paying for a child that isn’t theirs because their SO cheated on them. Additionally, why would the hospital give you the “neigh…
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:20 AM
1

Lmao you sound so cringe
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:10 AM
-1

A wage gap exists, just not for the reasons proposed.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:05 AM
1

Probably because it’s source is literally an Instagram post.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:05 AM
-2

Or… or… MGTOW was banned on reddit because they were literally inciting anti-female hatred, violence, and rape. Idk, just a thought.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 02:00 AM
1

Religious nut jobs. Has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 01:57 AM
-2

Nope, if my partner thought I was cheating I’d be equally offended. It’s a trust issue. Not everyone woman is a lying, cheating hoe.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 01:56 AM
0

And?
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 01:56 AM
1

I agree, why should it be mandatory? If the father is distrusting of his SO that much, he can simply request for one.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 01:54 AM
2

Yeah the people on this “anti-woman” community are questionable. Every single one of their profiles except for the creator makes posts on subreddits like r/foreveralone and complain about how they have never had a relationship with women.. I wonder why 🤔
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 07:41 PM
2

Ohh. I haven’t seen much of it but I assume it something along the lines of the female version of the red pill.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 07:24 PM
1

What’s FDS?
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 07:20 PM
1

“Why stoop to their level” — guy is out here acting as if men have never been misogynistic unless it’s reactionary 😂
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 04:03 PM
1

“Why stoop to their level” — guy is out here acting as if men have never been misogynistic unless it’s reactionary 😂
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 04:03 PM
0

The above illustration originates from a campaign of male-on-female domestic abuse. If you believe that every campaign should cater to your incompetence and lack of common sense simply because you’re too socially inept to decipher situational context, then go ahead. But don’t blame others when you look absolutely stupid doing so.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 07:02 AM
0

It’s literally raising awareness for male-on-female domestic violence. Are we viewing the same image, here?
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 02:33 AM
1

Perhaps because the above format originates from a campaign against male-on-female domestic violence?
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:21 PM
0

Perhaps because the expression and illustration originate from a campaign of domestic violence against women? Just a thought.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 10:06 PM
1

Men complain about the effects of the Duluth Model and its teachings, and then come out and say shit like this. This is the exact reason why the Duluth Model exists, because men claim it is their right to inflict violence on another person. I truly hope you never deal with domestic violence or experience the death of a family member due to domestic violence, because statements like these are beyond a joke, and the fact the subreddit allows this and mass downvotes my comment for stating that OP i…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:33 PM
2

Unless you’re socially inept, no it’s not. It’s quite evidently a campaign against domestic violence. The amount of mental gymnastics you’re perpetuating in an attempt to victimise yourself by purposely pretending to be obtuse is just disingenuous. The context is already available – it's unrealistic that you’re expecting the campaign to disclose “unless in self-defence" when the campaign isn’t about self-defence.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:29 PM
0

Ah yes, when all else fails, just deny the irrefutable facts presented before you and orchestrate a conspiracy theory that the history books have been infiltrated by feminists. Let me guess, are you going to argue that the earth is flat, too? How about the moon landing was a hoax? Seriously, how detached from reality are you? “It wasn't until the mid-1970s that a woman could access a line of credit (property ownership) independently without a man to cosign her application.” source While you are …
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 11:05 AM
-2

Ooooh.. thank you! I was genuinely worried there.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 10:14 AM
0

Are you sure about that? According to a recent report by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) up to 50 million girls and women are missing from India' s population as a result of systematic gender discrimination in India. source The United Nations states an estimated 2,000 unborn girls are illegally aborted every day in India. source In a first ever global study on female infanticide by Asian Centre for Human Rights, a Delhi-based NGO dedicated to protection of human rights, it has been r…
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 10:10 AM
0

Yeah, just ignore the mass amount of infanticide, honour killings, child marriage, and wife beatings.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:13 AM
-4

Seriously? Are you really making the claim that men only act in self defence when they commit acts of violence, even homicide? What a fucking joke. I truly hope you never have to experience domestic violence or witness your family members die of DV, because what you just said is indefensible.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:04 AM
-8

That would be a plausible argument if the post argued any of what you’re implying it does above. Nowhere within that post does it state that men aren’t also victims of domestic abuse, neither does it condemn men who use self-defence. You’re misconstruing the entire message and I agree, it’s cringe.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 08:51 AM
1

Agree — the guy in OP’s post has a questionable post history, too.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 06:31 AM
0

Really? Because feminism has actually gone to great lengths to achieve the equality and liberation of both sexes, but I guess anti-feminists like to pick and choose what they see.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 09:44 PM
1

It’s ironic because this post is literally from a feminist blog.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 09:42 PM
2

I don’t engage with them so I haven’t experienced that.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 08:28 PM
1

If by “stirring up shit” you mean opposing views, then sure, that’s why I’m here.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 08:10 PM
1

That’s assuming that all people in relationships have sex, which is an assumption, not a fact. I don’t believe in evolutionary-psychology; it’s a form of pseudoscience pushed by biased male researchers commonly used by “red-pill men” who have no idea what they’re fucking talking about. There’s no point arguing it with me. In regards to your last paragraph, that’s my point.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 08:09 PM
2

Lol, typical. As soon as someone asks how this post has any relevance to feminism, you run away with your tail tucked between your legs. Bye bye you brainless mong. Jesus Christ what a mess.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 01:45 AM
-1

Yup, you caught me. We should start by censoring your verbal diarrhoea. Your refusal to answer a simple question is very telling of your stance. I’m arguing with an idiot.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 01:22 AM
2

Not really, it’s pushing for the deemphasis of non-judgement for number of previous relationships. I don’t see the issue.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 01:21 AM
-12

What part of a 53 year old woman’s tinder profile seeking someone to engage in a cuckhold fetish has anything to do with feminism? Please enlighten me, because I’m failing to see your point of view. I agree, where are the moderators? This irrelevant garbage needs to be cycled out of this sub.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:45 PM
-19

This still has absolutely nothing to do with feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:34 PM
1

Nowhere in the original post does it imply women are sleeping around, and even if it did, that doesn’t justify attacking them for it. Get rid of this psycho puritanism bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:31 PM
3

No it doesn’t, you’re drawing conclusions from the small excerpt above based on your own individual implication. It clearly states within the paragraph to “Defend sisters who enjoy having sex” and “Don’t judge your sister’s worth from how many boyfriend’s she’s had”. You’re going to have to explain to me how these statements correlate to a woman objectifying herself, because last time I checked, objects don’t have boyfriends and it’s not wrong for a girl to engage in sexual intercourse unless yo…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:30 PM
1

Claiming that someone’s “wrong” doesn’t really hold much sentiment to whatever it is you’re arguing. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110323105202.htm https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939772/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886910002692 https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/why_we_should_help_boys_to_embrace_all_their_feelings
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:23 PM
1

Because enjoying sex isn’t objectifying yourself. I’m concerned of your biased prejudice if you believe that women are objects for engaging in a biological function.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:12 PM
2

Instead of making a baseless assertion that I’m “wrong” on everything I said, at the very least you can provide me evidence on what I’m wrong on. My opinion is more than just an opinion when it’s supported through numerous psychological studies, but sure — continue telling men that they are weak and feminine for functioning like a normal human being in their natural psychological state.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 11:09 PM
1

No it doesn’t.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 09:57 PM
0

“Support hoes that can’t keep their legs closed” – this is exactly what you wrote, which anyone who doesn’t lack critical thinking skills can easily discern that it’s a satirical criticism of the excerpt provided above, which asserts that girls should protect girls by defending “sisters” who enjoy having sex. Unless I’m missing something and the statement above actually asserts that girls should protects girls by defending “sisters” who enjoy having a lot of sex, right? Either way, my point stil…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 08:51 PM
0

they are just my friends and never lay a hand on them you cocksucker or I'll kill you Confirmed: anti-feminists are 12 year old cringe edgelords who never transcended from their anti-SJW phase. I’m not referring to feminism, you inbred mong. I couldn’t care less if you’re against feminism. The point of my comment was that you had no issue labelling women within polyamory relationships as “cheating whores” based on an out-of-context excerpt fed to you by a brainless cretin while simultaneously of…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 07:59 PM
0

Your presumption that authors do not amplify or – for lack of better wording; “click-bait” – the content within their social media articles for viewership, since that is quite literally what they are paid to do, highlights your lack of discernment and the ability to gauge between what is ‘real’ and what strictly consists within the online sphere. To me, it seems like the male within this article is wearing the feminist label as a banner, when in reality, feminism neither encourages or discourage…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 07:48 PM
2

The issue is that you’re assuming that any girl who enjoys sex is a slut, which is such an unironically played out response towards women and their promiscuity. In reality, these women are engaging in the same sexual acts as men – probably less – and yet they’re the ones who face the societal backlash as a result. These attacks are outdated and overused to the point where they lose all meaning and any woman who engages in sex is now brandished as a “slut”, “whore”, or “hoe”. No one is setting bo…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 07:11 PM
-1

This is so fucking cringe. Boys aren’t “feminine” for refraining from transmuting into emotionless, impassive robots within society that have to fit into this stereotypical mould of enjoying sex – which borderline pertains to this falsehood that men cannot be raped by women – and domestic violence ‘supposedly’ doesn’t affect them. Girls aren’t wanton sluts that lack the ability of self-control and autonomy to refrain from sexual intercourse because they enjoy engaging in sexual acts. The idea th…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:58 PM
3

This has absolutely nothing to do with feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:46 PM
-1

u/dingoperson2 is utter idiotic trash who has cherry-picked a single paragraph from a non-confirmed anonymous source of a man speaking about his and his wife’s polyamorous relationship and weaponised it as a justification to espouse hatred towards feminism and encourage users like u/Longjumping-Back214 within this platform to call out women for being “whores” and cheating while the man within this relationship receives zero criticism for engaging in equal acts because they’ve highlighted an out …
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:44 PM
0

Sooo.. in other words, my statement still holds true. Stop believing everything you see on the internet and weaponising it as a form of justification to espouse hatred towards feminism. In regards to your last statement of cherry-picked anecdotes, there are extremists in every movement. I hope you keep that same energy for the mens rights movement, but knowing the stereotype of anti-feminists, you probably don’t.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:35 PM
-2

Oh no! The anti-feminist called me a femboy!! I’m melting!!!!
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 06:21 PM
-3

Yeah because that definitely happened. Stop believing everything you see on the internet and weaponising it as a form of justification to espouse hatred towards feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 04:38 PM
-2

Yeah because that definitely happened. Stop believing everything you see on the internet and weaponising it as a form of justification to espouse hatred towards feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 04:37 PM
1

Girls and boys are constantly arguing with each other. Were you never a kid? I know growing up as a girl the boys always told us we had “cooties”. Jesus Christ, stop psychoanalysing everything you see on Twitter.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:34 AM
0

Jesus Christ shut the fuck up. Girls and boys are constantly arguing with each other. Were you never a kid? I know growing up as a girl the boys always told us we had “cooties”. Stop psychoanalysing everything you see on Twitter and tying it to political ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:33 AM
1

Exactly, some questions lean towards radical feminism and some lean towards liberal feminism, so of course they’re going to be on completely separate ends of the scale.
/r/AntiFeminists11/10/21 11:33 AM
-2

The test isn’t “saying anything”. These are random questions specifically to determine which branch of feminism you lean towards. I don’t understand why you’re assuming the pornography questions are based on the authors beliefs.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/21 10:16 AM
1

I think you’re looking too deeply into this. The questions are made in a way to detect what type of feminist you are. A few of those questions are based on radical feminism, which is why OP thinks they’re the most ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/21 10:13 AM
1

Feminists Criminalized Gay Male Rapists because they are man haters and need excuses to put men in Jail, that's all! Bullshit. Feminism largely contributed to efforts of reaching inclusivity of gay men, including expanding the definition of hate crimes to fit all (LGBTQ) identities and mitigating stereotypes surrounding HIV/AIDS and gay men. https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/hate_crime_laws https://visualaids.org/blog/aids-activism-and-beyond-radical-queer-politics-of-the-80s-and-90s Feminis…
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 11:12 AM
1

God, you even go to the extent of spamming fathers who are posting joyous news of their baby to get a DNA test. Who hurt you in your lifetime?
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 11:55 PM
1

Buddy, it’s evident you just hold a lot of contempt and hatred towards women. So there’s no point arguing with you. All you do is parrot the same three accusations against women and then blame women when your obnoxious posts get taken down for spam or violating sub rules. Please fix your mental health and stop allowing the opposite sex to cause such pent up bitterness and anger. Also, get off the internet. I promise you women aren’t the evil, man-hating monsters that you think they are.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 11:50 PM
1

Your idea of strength and independence is very flawed. The epitome of reddit doesn’t determine who women are. No offence, but you sound about 12 years old. Come back to me when you grow up and stop playing the victim card. Edit: your post history says it all. You’re a nutter.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 04:31 PM
1

Women have the whole world protecting them from what, exactly? Other men? Well that's obviously because women face more gendered crime and are biologically vulnerable. Not too sure what your argument has to do with independence that women fought so hard for.
/r/AntiFeminists06/09/21 03:47 PM
1

So you mean to say divorced mother of two, liberal columnist Karen Straughen, the founder of the resistance known as anti-feminism was detached from reality and thought she wanted to oppress men? I'm confused, here. Did you read my above comment? I'm not claiming that Men's rights activists are seeking to oppress men. All the examples you've provided below seem to by distinct to radical militant feminism. Of course, with no sources, I can't really look into all of them. However, they seem to be …
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 06:24 PM
0

Are you insinuating that because they are only problematic along the bible belt, they don't matter? I'm also pretty sure that most states allow doctors to refuse women access to a medical procedure to have their tubes tied based on religious and marital status. While I agree that the abortion movement is heavily influenced by religion, there are plenty of pro-lifers who aren't religious. Women's reproductive rights is very much a feminist issue. Planned Parenthood is a woman's rights organisatio…
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 06:11 PM
1

"Hurr durr feminists advocated for a broadened definition of rape to be inclusive of men but that's not good enough because they didn't overturn PIV rape!!! Feminist fault that a government run by men won't accept their petitions!! feminist bad!!" "Hurr durr feminists create an entire resource centre to support men suffering from suicidal ideation and mental illness but that's not good enough because feminists also want to change their unhealthy habits and behaviour that lead to a mental decline…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:12 PM
1

People already oppose these groups.. as I've literally just done above. But of course you want to paint your own narrative whenever you see someone who isn't pertaining to your anti-feminist beliefs. Why is it okay for you to claim feminism is inherently anti-male and harmful to men based on the actions of a minority of militant feminists, but it's not okay for me to oppose this view by bringing up all the good things that feminism has done for men? So it's okay for you to generalise, but not fo…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:12 PM
1

Part 2) I just looked therepproject , its as i expected, 100% Female Oriented:- That's because it's a feminist organisation. Of course it's most recent campaigns are going to be primarily female-based. The organisation is still inclusive of men. You haven't provided anything of substance. I'm still not going to forgive Feminists for blocking Suicide Awareness Event on MEN'S DAY. CALM, like every Feminist only seeks to change Men, rather than seeking to CHANGE SOCIETY to help Men. Upon writing th…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:11 PM
1

Part 1) Ah yes, Erin Pizzey.. the same woman with no academia to back up her spiteful rhetoric against women and female DV victims where she projects her trauma and weaponizes it as an excuse to spout hatred towards women and feminists. This is the same woman who claims that 100% of female domestic violence victims are abusive to both their partner and children. This is the same woman who claims that female domestic violence victims consent to abuse. This is the same woman who holds traditionali…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:10 PM
-1

I don't think we're on the same page. When I refer to gendered issues prevalent in society to women, I'm referring to reproductive, workplace, and parental laws, to put it simply, not that gender pay gap crap.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 02:26 PM
0

No, you just lack the critical thinking skills to be able to do so.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 02:04 PM
0

I’m assuming you’re not one of these “smart people”. You automatically dismissed legal documentation as “misinformation” based on zero reasoning, so that tells me a lot about what sort of person you are. Just say you lack the ability to provide a counterargument and go. Jesus Christ.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 01:56 PM
0

Yes, it is still an issue. I don’t understand what you mean by your comment.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 01:53 PM
0

Misinformation? Comical. They are all sourced by legal documentation. But anything to ignore your anti-feminist bias, right? This subreddit is a circlejerk. At least MRA is open to a civil discussion and exchange of beliefs. This place just labels anyone a feminist as anti-men. I engage in pro-men groups, too. You don’t know anything about me. Let me know when you step outside of your echo chamber.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 01:03 PM
0

Ah, so because you come from a developing country with deplorable laws (not to mention a lack of education) for their citizens, that must mean they represent the entirety of feminism? Please think for a second before you spout such bullshit. I don't know much about India's feminists, but from what I've heard, they invalidate male rape victims, so that alone signifies that youre probably right about them being anti-men. The issue is, you're insinuating that India represents the entire world of fe…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 10:10 AM
-2

This is coming from the person who accuses feminism of advocating to take away all of men’s rights despite feminism fighting for many of men’s rights in terms of gender equality. Anti-feminists are so detached from reality that they truly believe women are seeking to oppress them. It’s hilarious.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:49 AM
-2

You know nothing about feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:45 AM
1

Ironic.. feminism has done the opposite of that. Or do you only account for militant radical feminists and group them as whole? List of things feminism has done for men's rights: 1) Campaigned to broaden the legal definition of rape in the US to include male rape victims. In the spring of 2011, Ms., the Feminist Majority Foundation, and the Women’s Law Project initiated a campaign to change the over-80-year-old definition of “forcible rape” to a broader definition. Using online resources, femini…
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 09:11 AM
1

You received a bunch of downvotes because this subreddit is a circlejerk of people who refuse open discussion.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:44 AM
-1

Despite the fact many feminists and their organisations have gone to great lengths to liberate men and advocate for gender-equality. Sure.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:43 AM
1

Equality and social oppression is still a prevalent issue in the West.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:42 AM
-2

There are different branches of feminism. You can’t group them all under the same beliefs. No, feminism doesn’t advocate to take away all the rights of men. This is the issue with anti-feminists groups. You parrot what you hear from masked misogynists.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:41 AM
1

Wasn’t the incel subreddit banned?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 11:09 PM
1

Do you have any evidence that this is a fundamental belief of feminism in regards to pedophilia?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 11:07 PM
0

Please provide a source for the lobbying claim. As far as I’m aware, feminists (except India) are the ones advocating for a broadened definition of rape and have successfully achieved that within the US.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 05:58 PM
1

Yikes. Red-pill/incel ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 05:52 PM
2

Women have all the rights in the world. This is not only false, but you’re insinuating that rights are the same as equality.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 05:50 PM
0

You asked me how women are oppressed within the US. I answered that question by providing an example of oppression that women face. You counterargued my answer (why? I don't know) by using whataboutism.. in other words "what about men? Men also don't have reproductive rights!" You haven't gone into details of how men lack reproductive rights, but for argument's sake, I'm going to assume you're telling the truth. So now I'm sitting here thinking, what does that have to do with the oppression wome…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 04:55 PM
-15

Every single thing you just provided right now is a form of whataboutism. Please learn to construct an argument before responding. Also, there’s a reason men don’t get a say on abortion. Bodily autonomy is an important right in our country.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 04:33 PM
-18

Reproductive laws is one primary example I can think of. That and social oppression which is still prevalent within society.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 04:24 PM
-17

I would argue that women are oppressed in some ways in the US.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 04:16 PM
1

Objectification isn’t a privilege. What you mean by “all privilege is a result of inequality” is that the other sex faces the inequality as a result of the privilege. This isn’t the case for this example because the sex with the privilege is gaining that same privilege as a result of inequality.
/r/PussyPass21/08/21 01:53 AM
1

A privilege as a result of inequality isn’t a privilege. You can continue arguing that it is, but I strongly disagree. Women shouldn’t be objectified in order to receive free merchandise. This creates a toxic environment for women.
/r/PussyPass20/08/21 01:51 PM
1

Free merchandise at the expense of sexualising someone isn’t a privilege.
/r/PussyPass20/08/21 03:18 AM
1

Except it’s not a privilege.
/r/PussyPass19/08/21 02:05 AM
3

I'm not saying that women aren't targeted either. I'm simply explaining why the media is focusing on women because essentially, women under the Taliban are at much inherent risk than men. But yes, war is detrimental to both parties. It's just that the Taliban and middle-east traditions are notorious for the oppression of women and treating the opposite sex as second-class citizens. Why do you think incel culture is celebrating the Taliban invading Afghanistan?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:47 AM
-3

Pointlessly gendered? The point is that women are targeted because they are women. As mentioned prior, women and girls in Afghanistan in the 90's and 2000's couldn't receive an education, were forced to wear a hijab, forced into marriages, and forcibly raped solely due to their gender.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:25 AM
-3

I'm aware that both genders are treated badly but women are targeted and oppressed solely because of their gender. In the 90's and early 2000's women in Afghanistan were prevented from education and forced to wear a hijab. These same rules were not applied to the male gender. They were applied to women and girls because of their sex.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:47 AM
-9

But they aren't massacred or having their rights stripped from them solely due to their gender. Women in Afghanistan are targeted because they are women. End of.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:43 AM
-17

Because it’s women’s rights that are primarily at risk. By the taliban, women are treated as second-class citizens and they are targeting women in political power.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:27 AM
-1

Women being over-sexualised isn’t female privilege. I don’t know what warped reality you’re living in.
/r/PussyPass16/08/21 01:09 PM
5

The chemical release from “pair-bonding” (oxytocin) is largely associated to whether one climaxes or not. 70-80% of women don’t even report finishing during one night stands. I’d have to look into it further, but by large, it’s evolutionary-psychology pseudoscience. But obviously those who engage in frequent sex with different people, both men and women, see sex as more physical rather than intimate, so it’s a plausible theory. Although, of course, correlation isn’t always causation.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/21 10:01 AM
3

I'm use to it by now - a bunch of seething men who abandon the discussion as soon as they realise that they didn't even bother to read their own source beyond the first paragraph. This entire subreddit is a circle jerk of armchair pseudo scientists who like to dictate what women can and can’t do despite their same sources stating that men are also effected by these actions.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/21 04:12 AM
1

I have no argument for what you said because you’re accusing me of saying or implying something I never said or implied. Lmao
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 10:28 PM
1

Where did I imply that these men are woman-hating or hate women? Please let me know.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 10:26 PM
1

Where did I say this is woman-hating or that you hate women? Please let me know. There’s nothing wrong with this post. I partially agree with it. This comment, however, is false. I’m yet to meet someone to prove it true.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 10:24 PM
0

Yes, just provide me a study done on rodents. No lack of integrity there.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 10:06 PM
0

Yes, I’m aware that NPD produces different effects in women than men. Now what’s your point?
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 10:00 PM
0

More pseudo-evolutionary psychology. Stop coughing up tired, confirmation-bias stroking "theories" on a topic you don’t understand. Oxytocin release and pairing bond is largely related to sociological construct. I’m not even going to mention the psychological effects of climaxing and how 70-80% of women don’t orgasm during sex.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:58 PM
-1

Thanks for proving my point.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:50 PM
1

The irony in this comment is hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:49 PM
0

No, your study doesn’t indicate otherwise. Read your own source.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:48 PM
4

Upon reading this study, I've realised I've actually read it before. The only empirical evidence it provides that decreases marriage unhappiness in women more than men is due to children outside of the relationship. Their data show that premarital sex sometimes leads to premarital fertility, and women (but not men) who have children from other relationships have lower-quality relationships. As for higher body counts, your own source only cites a 3% difference in marriage unhappiness between men …
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:46 PM
2

If you're referring to oxytocin, there is no difference in levels between men and women when engaging in intercourse. Unless you're going to provide me a bunch of evolutionary psychological pseudoscience promoted by biased male researchers. Sociology is a large contributor to ability to pair bond.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:10 PM
3

I’ll read your study now. In the context of the full model, five predictors [...] were significant predictors. Gender was a negative predictor (men cheat more often), satisfaction was negative, while number of sex partners, quality of alternatives and impulsivity were found as positive predictors. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/000712605X47936?referrer_access_token=-7DShhJB3t9NLg7GcTP4NMN5spBk6yCQw6-FGzQytuhZ28kExv_qvwlzpxCDV75mWzW6FORHfRpsDW5Uwd3RvnJVjQry2YNntrTfofAJqP…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:06 PM
-1

No idea what those things are, sorry.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:05 PM
2

Great! A study I have to purchase to read and doesn't even provide any detail of higher body count in women correlating to increased likelihood of infidelity than men. This study, which I'll link below, on the other hand, states: In the context of the full model, five predictors [...] were significant predictors. Gender was a negative predictor (men cheat more often), satisfaction was negative, while number of sex partners, quality of alternatives and impulsivity were found as positive predictors.…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 09:04 PM
-3

Post a study that shows the opposite.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 08:54 PM
-14

I mean, you just contradicted your own point there. The divorce rate is largely contributed by infidelity committed by men, as demonstrated in NCBI studies. Men with high body counts have an increased likelihood of infidelity and less likelihood of commitment in marriages. Whether women initiate divorce has no relevance because the cause of divorce is a two-way issue. Anyway, I'm not going to take someone seriously when they call all women inherently narcissistic, despite NPD being diagnosed in …
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 08:45 PM
-17

With one of the primary reasons of divorce being infidelity and unfaithfulness committed by men. I’m not too sure what you’re arguing, here.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 08:31 PM
-29

Go look up studies. There are numerous ones that demonstrate men having more partners increases their likelihood of infidelity, divorce, and decreased happiness. The effect is more pronounced in men than in women
/r/TheRedPill07/08/21 08:19 PM
1

Please elaborate on what you mean by "this is how women act" and how it is different to how men act. You've provided zero substance to this discourse. Evolutionary psychology is pseudoscience promoted by biased male researchers to justify and normalise terrible actions made by men. Humans have progressed past their primitive state. The demonization of sexually liberated women is a result of purity culture and systemic sexism. There is no such thing as a female being a slut. That's a misogynistic…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/21 03:08 AM
0

Your lack of explanation on the subject is really telling of your entire stance, character, and how you perceive women. Oh well, I didn’t expect much of a response from a red-piller who believes that pseudoscience can justify misogynistic views of the opposite sex. I’d like to clarify, though. I’m not saying that history doesn’t matter. No. I’m saying that the negative consequences of someone’s sexual past isn’t solely limited to women.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/21 12:33 PM
0

There are studies that have been cited on TRP multiple times which show that far more women than men have reproduced throughout history, something like 5 to 1. Evolutionary psychology is pseudoscience promoted by biased male researchers to justify and normalise terrible actions made by men. Even so, if you're making the claim that more women reproduce throughout history than men, then would that not justify women being polyamory more than men? Unattractive women will still get laid, mostly with …
/r/TheRedPill20/07/21 10:50 AM
1

Call me stupid, but I don’t understand the reference.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/21 07:00 AM
1

Simply not true. Even the most disgusting woman will have more success getting laid than a below average man. Simply not true based on who's terms? Yours? Then we'll just have to agree to disagree. Because I know for a fact that there are plenty of women who aren't even close to being conventionally attractive and are rejected by plenty of men for sex, especially because men are more visual, as mentioned prior. You are insinuating that all a woman has to do is talk to any man she wants and she w…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 11:33 PM
-1

Women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of commitment. For fucks sake. I'm sorry, but some of you people really need to grow the fuck up and stop regurgitating this word vomit of a fallacy that doesn't exist. I don't mean to come off as an asshole, but to anyone who believes in this shit, please go outside and touch some grass. An ugly and fat woman is going to find it just as hard to engage in intercourse as an ugly and fat man, if not harder, since men are visual whereas wome…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 09:07 PM
4

God, this comment is far too vague for me to even respond to. Are you insinuating that it’s okay to objectify women because they objectify themselves? Please explain. As for shaming behaviour, WHO here is shaming anyone’s behaviour? Do you mean men who tell other men they’re weak for not being narcissistic ass wipes to the opposite gender?
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 08:55 PM
2

In regards to the second part of your comment, it is theorised by scientists that men and women’s biological clock are of the same. Just because men can impregnate a woman at the age of 40-50, that doesn’t mean they should impregnate a woman due to the high risk of health defects. It is recommended for a man to freeze his sperm before the age of 35.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 06:42 AM
2

https://www.nature.com/articles/mp201570 https://www.healthline.com/health-news/does-older-sperm-cause-autism#Focus-on-cause-as-autism-cases-rise https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5299396/ https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190513081409.htm https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/getting-pregnant/expert-answers/paternal-age/faq-20057873
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 06:40 AM
5

The fact that you correlate non-toxic behaviour as a weakness truly shows how transparently this manosphere feeds such "bullshit" to young boys/men. There's a reason TRP is seen as a breeding ground for misogyny. The idea that men are owed sex, that women are second-class citizens (AKA lesser than man), and that your partner/spouse should be objectified to the state where she is treated as an accessory to you is all perpetuated by outdated sexist ideals. This post is not healthy; it is full-blow…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/21 02:12 AM
-2

It's a waste of time because it's hypocritical to try to push forward a hypothesis based on contradictory and outdated misogynistic beliefs. The idea that a woman is tainted due to how many people she's slept with is the result of purity culture and sociological effects. There is no fundamental difference. A woman could lie to you and tell you her body count is around the 1-2 mark despite having a count of up to 20, as most women do in fear of being shamed, and you wouldn't even know. The key an…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/21 07:01 PM
2

That explanation is contradictory on a biological standpoint when you take into account that older mens sperm is of low-quality and increases the chances of children being born with cognitive disorders. Studies show that older men do not make good fathers.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/21 06:51 PM
4

Sad to see how much men feed into this narcissistic BS. When you treat women as commodities and accessories, you haven’t realised it yet, but you’re going to have such a sad and meaningless life ahead of you.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/21 06:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter