| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woman slaps and chokes football player, no charges. He hits her back, gets probation and suspended from playing.No one's buying the act, dude. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/16 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Woman slaps and chokes football player, no charges. He hits her back, gets probation and suspended from playing.I'm not sure you even know what argument you're making. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/16 06:59 PM |
| 1 | Woman slaps and chokes football player, no charges. He hits her back, gets probation and suspended from playing.You're calling for a society in which only one segment has a right to bodily inviolability and to determine if they are being threatened. While the other loses the right to decide if they have been violated, and loses the right to defend themselves. I am absolutely against violence as a first or even second resort. But apply your argument to any segment of society other than gender and you will see how ethically bankrupt it is. | /r/PussyPass | 18/12/16 11:44 AM |
| 8 | Woman slaps and chokes football player, no charges. He hits her back, gets probation and suspended from playing.Is this guy an asshole? Sure. But you are appealing to different standards. All manner of contact has been taken seriously as assault by the courts. Either a push and a slap are nothing, or they are something. We can't maintain two legal standards and call ourselves a just society. | /r/PussyPass | 17/12/16 02:46 PM |
| 3 | Woman slaps and chokes football player, no charges. He hits her back, gets probation and suspended from playing.That refers to the "threat of violence". That is probably something a court could determine, but is at the same time subjective, and would have to surpass standards for free speech. Which are pretty broad in what is allowable for a reason. | /r/PussyPass | 17/12/16 02:41 PM |
| 13 | In a disturbing new MTV show, men are stabbed or beaten up by women, in the name of feminismEven if you're a tough man, there is always someone tougher than you. Men learn this by middle school. | /r/PussyPass | 14/12/16 10:06 AM |
| 9 | Kansas judge rules sperm donor not on hook for child supportThey weren't going after him to care for the child. They were going after him to pay for the child. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 03:22 PM |
| 2 | Female writer tells women not to have premarital sex or else end up divorced. Somehow it's men's "typical" behavior.Meanwhile, if you've ever had sex with more than one person you know how much it can impact the success or failure of a relationship, and the idea of marrying anyone - man or woman - without knowing if you are sexually compatible is the definition of insanity. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/16 01:42 PM |
| 2 | Feminist smackdown of Michael Moore on twitter.Brenda Ann Spencer, 1979. The inspiration for the modern era of lone gun school shooters. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 11:23 AM |
| 1 | "Campaign Against Sex Robots warns of danger to women and children." Any "danger" to men is, of course, totally irrelevant...Ok, but that's a material offense involving an actual object (the video). It's not a crime to think about the contents of that video. (As I said- yet). | /r/MensRights | 25/11/16 09:32 PM |
| 110 | "Campaign Against Sex Robots warns of danger to women and children." Any "danger" to men is, of course, totally irrelevant...There's no such thing as an illegal fantasy. (Yet.) | /r/MensRights | 25/11/16 10:44 AM |
| 1 | School made all the boys take an oath to never hit a women today. They spoke about the "wage gap" and the 1/3 statistic. Pretty insulting.No idea why I've never used "they're" this way. It's going to be my new thing. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/16 12:14 PM |
| 12 | Teacher sentenced to 30 years for molesting a female student files appeal, says she wouldn't have been punished so harshly if her victim had been a boyI don't think someone deserves 30 years for having sex with a 16 year old, regardless of gender. There are homicides with sentencing guidelines less than that. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/16 09:04 AM |
| 30 | Girl attacks boy. Boy defends himself. Boy is ridiculed on Social Media for putting hands on a girl.It's pretty chilling how utterly incorrect they are in describing what happened in the video. They also say another friend "attempted to intervene" before the first altercation, when the second girl threw punches after. I mean.... the video is right there... on your own site... | /r/MensRights | 20/10/16 09:46 AM |
| 15 | Girl attacks boy. Boy defends himself. Boy is ridiculed on Social Media for putting hands on a girl.Your resistance scenario is based on the assumption that you are/will be only slapped, which you have no way of knowing. It is both reasonable to not want to be struck, and to resist being struck again. It's the wrong question, and an appeal to emotion disguised as logic. The son escalated. Reverse the genders and ask yourself this question. Would you still excuse it as "tearful passion"? Why not? How do you possibly know the medical status and history of a homeless man you are passing on the st… | /r/MensRights | 20/10/16 07:28 AM |
| 10 | The only reason why women came in is because it's safer for them break up an arguement when a man is abusing a woman. If a man came in and tried to stop the arguement,I once saw a man and woman in an argument in the street and felt concerned for the woman's safety. I intervened, only to be yelled at by the woman to mind my own business. Ok, then. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/16 05:36 PM |
| 1 | A simple test for her = epic failWell now we've simply circled back to discussing the burden men face. | /r/TheRedPill | 20/09/16 11:38 PM |
| 1 | A simple test for her = epic failWell that's fine, but I was addressing another comment in which it was suggested she couldnt choose the subject. The issue of whether the entire exercise is scientifically sound is absolutely debateable. | /r/TheRedPill | 20/09/16 09:28 PM |
| 13 | A simple test for her = epic fail"Anything from sports to soap operas." It sounds like he basically let her choose the topic. | /r/TheRedPill | 20/09/16 05:31 PM |
| 2 | Another British woman with no respect for other's privacy, and of course another pussypassHe wasn't house-sitting, didn't know the deceased girl, and was invited. You don't even have to accept that she did anything wrong to acknowledge it was not the same thing. | /r/PussyPass | 09/09/16 03:35 PM |
| 1 | Another delusional feminist claims women never ever abuse or kill men, because "it's impossible"...You took her argument too seriously. You should've just said : "Fantasy. Monsters. Lol." | /r/MensRights | 16/08/16 03:11 PM |
| 12 | Becouse men cannot be objectified...This is completely ok, Everyone involved is a consenting adult. Hooters is completely ok, too. Yes, there is a double-standard. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Winona Ryder Opens Up About Double Standards and Anxiety- Oh, poor Winona! Give me a break.Well in a sense this could be understood as a call for women to be recognized as being the more "emotional" sex, or as push-back against the modern media requirement that female characters all be PhD Ninja Astronaut CEOs. She said nothing about the "shaming" deriving from men, specifically. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/16 01:46 AM |
| 3 | Feminist Kiva Smith-Pearson also known as Kiva Bay received over 31,100 USD through Kickstarter for her project A Feminist Deck, but decided to run with the money and defraud all the 912 backers. Feminism shows again its true face.It's simple. A vocal proponent of inequality is revealed to have no intellectual or ethical foundation from which to be taken seriously. | /r/MensRights | 08/07/16 02:56 AM |
| 1 | Refutation of "Women Would Rule Better"prototype theory has nothing to do with either strict binaries or ideal archetypes The binary I'm referring to is the one you put forward: submissive/dominant. I would consider this a topic to proceed from, if that can't be acknowledged. What they say this demonstrates is that our understanding of what is ‘normal’ (i.e. prototypical or ‘ideal’ - where ideal means typical or canonical not 'perfect') varies according to the environment Classic subjective ethics. It seems obvious on its face that s… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/16 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Refutation of "Women Would Rule Better"I'm not really going to go into the "ideal" subject very far, except to say that college taught me how to see, & I thought we were shying away from imposing strict binaries as a means to understand the subject at hand. In any case, I am aware of no universal council on the establishment of ideal archetypes, except perhaps for the media, who stoop to the lowest common denominator in all things. I'm all for ignoring them in instances such as these, and also when they ignore genuine equality in the… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/16 12:04 AM |
| 1 | Refutation of "Women Would Rule Better"I also have indeed been summarizing or condensing some positions for the sake of establishing positions, and I think we are beginning to see why. But in keeping with the "devil's advocate" nature of how one might respond to a hypothetical argument being put forward, I'll try to succinctly demonstrate how I would respond to a few key positions. but from a feminist perspective this doesn’t apply because not all feminists would hold to a strictly biological understanding of gender in the first plac… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Refutation of "Women Would Rule Better"Ok, good stuff. & here might be a response to that, to clarify. If biology can be separated from behavior, a la Thatcher being a woman but behaving to all other intents and purposes as a man, then you have essentially destroyed all arguments based strictly on biology, and it cannot be put forward that women would rule better based on biology. It also undermines that wing of feminism which holds simply being biologically male as a negative. The only way to maintain that argument is to argue that … | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 04:28 PM |
| 1 | Refutation of "Women Would Rule Better"From a strictly logical standpoint, and assuming an all-dominating context of patriarchy applied, the apparent next response to these responses would have to be: If the negative behavior and accomplishments of female rulers in the past could be said to be attributable to men, to what would we attribute the positive behavior and accomplishments of female rulers in the past? Now, for the sake of argument we can assume the answer will not also be "men". The most likely answer will be that the posit… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Trump's popularity is sign of the backlash against feminism, politcal correctness, and SJWsThis has been obvious for a long time. He's the ultimate troll. Even he doesn't believe what he's saying most of the time - he just knows what will piss people off the most. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/16 01:44 AM |
| 54 | Hey guys! Want to end rape culture? Just take one for the team!Holy shit: "The truth is a political construct..." That's the position of every tyrant throughout history. Terrifying. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/16 08:46 AM |
| 11 | "The Hunt" is a very interesting movie, about how a false accusation can ruin a mans life. Worth a watch, if you have the time.Not sure if someone's done this already, but there should be a list somewhere of movies that fairly treat the subject of men in modern society. I just watched "the Lost Honour of Christopher Jeffries" on Netflix. Based on a real criminal case, it examines how a man was demonized and accused of murder simply because he was different, and didn't match society's prevailing standards for how a man should be. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/16 12:23 PM |
| 5 | Student teacher who sexually abused three students, as young as 15 years old, sentenced to probationIs there any evidence that shows it is just as damaging for a teen boy to have sex with an adult woman as it is for a teen girl to have sex with an adult man? Why would you assume otherwise? | /r/MensRights | 16/02/16 12:37 AM |
| 2 | "Mattress Girl" Quotes from talk at Brown University. Unsurprisingly, she appears to be anti-science/facts.You seem to have some insight into the scientific determination of facts. Are there no non-observable facts? (I.e., if a person is blind, does the color red factually exist?) Or rather, are there no facts that can be observed only indirectly? (Say, only by evidence of their impact, or the corroboration of additional information?). Because the argument MG is making is one rooted in modern social sciences, and seeks to place women's word above men's in cases like these specifically because observa… | /r/MensRights | 28/04/15 12:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter