TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sir_wooly_merkins Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by sir_wooly_merkins on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No one's buying the act, dude.
/r/PussyPass18/12/16 09:00 PM
1

I'm not sure you even know what argument you're making.
/r/PussyPass18/12/16 06:59 PM
1

You're calling for a society in which only one segment has a right to bodily inviolability and to determine if they are being threatened. While the other loses the right to decide if they have been violated, and loses the right to defend themselves. I am absolutely against violence as a first or even second resort. But apply your argument to any segment of society other than gender and you will see how ethically bankrupt it is.
/r/PussyPass18/12/16 11:44 AM
8

Is this guy an asshole? Sure. But you are appealing to different standards. All manner of contact has been taken seriously as assault by the courts. Either a push and a slap are nothing, or they are something. We can't maintain two legal standards and call ourselves a just society.
/r/PussyPass17/12/16 02:46 PM
3

That refers to the "threat of violence". That is probably something a court could determine, but is at the same time subjective, and would have to surpass standards for free speech. Which are pretty broad in what is allowable for a reason.
/r/PussyPass17/12/16 02:41 PM
13

Even if you're a tough man, there is always someone tougher than you. Men learn this by middle school.
/r/PussyPass14/12/16 10:06 AM
9

They weren't going after him to care for the child. They were going after him to pay for the child.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:22 PM
2

Meanwhile, if you've ever had sex with more than one person you know how much it can impact the success or failure of a relationship, and the idea of marrying anyone - man or woman - without knowing if you are sexually compatible is the definition of insanity.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 01:42 PM
2

Brenda Ann Spencer, 1979. The inspiration for the modern era of lone gun school shooters.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 11:23 AM
1

Ok, but that's a material offense involving an actual object (the video). It's not a crime to think about the contents of that video. (As I said- yet).
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:32 PM
110

There's no such thing as an illegal fantasy. (Yet.)
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:44 AM
1

No idea why I've never used "they're" this way. It's going to be my new thing.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 12:14 PM
12

I don't think someone deserves 30 years for having sex with a 16 year old, regardless of gender. There are homicides with sentencing guidelines less than that.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:04 AM
30

It's pretty chilling how utterly incorrect they are in describing what happened in the video. They also say another friend "attempted to intervene" before the first altercation, when the second girl threw punches after. I mean.... the video is right there... on your own site...
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:46 AM
15

Your resistance scenario is based on the assumption that you are/will be only slapped, which you have no way of knowing. It is both reasonable to not want to be struck, and to resist being struck again. It's the wrong question, and an appeal to emotion disguised as logic. The son escalated. Reverse the genders and ask yourself this question. Would you still excuse it as "tearful passion"? Why not? How do you possibly know the medical status and history of a homeless man you are passing on the st…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 07:28 AM
10

I once saw a man and woman in an argument in the street and felt concerned for the woman's safety. I intervened, only to be yelled at by the woman to mind my own business. Ok, then.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:36 PM
1

Well now we've simply circled back to discussing the burden men face.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 11:38 PM
1

Well that's fine, but I was addressing another comment in which it was suggested she couldnt choose the subject. The issue of whether the entire exercise is scientifically sound is absolutely debateable.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 09:28 PM
13

"Anything from sports to soap operas." It sounds like he basically let her choose the topic.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/16 05:31 PM
2

He wasn't house-sitting, didn't know the deceased girl, and was invited. You don't even have to accept that she did anything wrong to acknowledge it was not the same thing.
/r/PussyPass09/09/16 03:35 PM
1

You took her argument too seriously. You should've just said : "Fantasy. Monsters. Lol."
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:11 PM
12

This is completely ok, Everyone involved is a consenting adult. Hooters is completely ok, too. Yes, there is a double-standard.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 09:10 PM
1

Well in a sense this could be understood as a call for women to be recognized as being the more "emotional" sex, or as push-back against the modern media requirement that female characters all be PhD Ninja Astronaut CEOs. She said nothing about the "shaming" deriving from men, specifically.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:46 AM
3

It's simple. A vocal proponent of inequality is revealed to have no intellectual or ethical foundation from which to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:56 AM
1

prototype theory has nothing to do with either strict binaries or ideal archetypes The binary I'm referring to is the one you put forward: submissive/dominant. I would consider this a topic to proceed from, if that can't be acknowledged. What they say this demonstrates is that our understanding of what is ‘normal’ (i.e. prototypical or ‘ideal’ - where ideal means typical or canonical not 'perfect') varies according to the environment Classic subjective ethics. It seems obvious on its face that s…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 10:59 PM
1

I'm not really going to go into the "ideal" subject very far, except to say that college taught me how to see, & I thought we were shying away from imposing strict binaries as a means to understand the subject at hand. In any case, I am aware of no universal council on the establishment of ideal archetypes, except perhaps for the media, who stoop to the lowest common denominator in all things. I'm all for ignoring them in instances such as these, and also when they ignore genuine equality in the…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:04 AM
1

I also have indeed been summarizing or condensing some positions for the sake of establishing positions, and I think we are beginning to see why. But in keeping with the "devil's advocate" nature of how one might respond to a hypothetical argument being put forward, I'll try to succinctly demonstrate how I would respond to a few key positions. but from a feminist perspective this doesn’t apply because not all feminists would hold to a strictly biological understanding of gender in the first plac…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:34 PM
1

Ok, good stuff. & here might be a response to that, to clarify. If biology can be separated from behavior, a la Thatcher being a woman but behaving to all other intents and purposes as a man, then you have essentially destroyed all arguments based strictly on biology, and it cannot be put forward that women would rule better based on biology. It also undermines that wing of feminism which holds simply being biologically male as a negative. The only way to maintain that argument is to argue that …
/r/MensRights12/06/16 04:28 PM
1

From a strictly logical standpoint, and assuming an all-dominating context of patriarchy applied, the apparent next response to these responses would have to be: If the negative behavior and accomplishments of female rulers in the past could be said to be attributable to men, to what would we attribute the positive behavior and accomplishments of female rulers in the past? Now, for the sake of argument we can assume the answer will not also be "men". The most likely answer will be that the posit…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:38 PM
1

This has been obvious for a long time. He's the ultimate troll. Even he doesn't believe what he's saying most of the time - he just knows what will piss people off the most.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:44 AM
54

Holy shit: "The truth is a political construct..." That's the position of every tyrant throughout history. Terrifying.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:46 AM
11

Not sure if someone's done this already, but there should be a list somewhere of movies that fairly treat the subject of men in modern society. I just watched "the Lost Honour of Christopher Jeffries" on Netflix. Based on a real criminal case, it examines how a man was demonized and accused of murder simply because he was different, and didn't match society's prevailing standards for how a man should be.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:23 PM
5

Is there any evidence that shows it is just as damaging for a teen boy to have sex with an adult woman as it is for a teen girl to have sex with an adult man? Why would you assume otherwise?
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:37 AM
2

You seem to have some insight into the scientific determination of facts. Are there no non-observable facts? (I.e., if a person is blind, does the color red factually exist?) Or rather, are there no facts that can be observed only indirectly? (Say, only by evidence of their impact, or the corroboration of additional information?). Because the argument MG is making is one rooted in modern social sciences, and seeks to place women's word above men's in cases like these specifically because observa…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter