~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -2 | Woman decides, man paysThe woman in this case had a job... it's mentioned in the judgment. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 01:19 PM |
| -3 | Woman decides, man paysFor something as material as this to be left out by the mother, the lawyers, AND the judge? Honestly improbable. Your question is: was it sufficiently communicated? Your reason: this is legally material. If you read the judgment, the mother says it was sufficiently communicated. The father doesn't disagree. So... why would the judge or the lawyers spend time on a detail that the parties don't disagree on? You (who are not a lawyer) decided you feel it is legally material to be mentioned in the j… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 01:16 PM |
| -5 | Woman decides, man paysUnless the father had agreed to pay the fees she should not have enrolled in the school. Simple as that. Non-response should not be assumed as agreement. The child's prior school said the child would be waitlisted for the next level. So who looks after the child while the child is on the waiting list for childcare? The mother informed the father. The father refused to participate. In the meantime, the child still needs to go to school / be cared for. If the father refuses to participate, is it o… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 09:26 AM |
| -1 | Woman decides, man paysthe state effectively giving a blank cheque to the ex-wife for child support This was pointed out to you in the original thread that the judge explicitly said there was no blank cheque. 34 Having said this, I would caveat that my views as above should not be taken by the Complainant as a carte blanche to incur expenses in an uninhibited manner, or with disregard to the Respondent’s views. It remains open to the court hearing an enforcement application to decide that it would be unjust to enforce… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 08:19 AM |
| 3 | Woman decides, man paysSo I was trying to explain this to OP in the other thread... Basically, in 2019, Mother and Father agreed that Father would pay for the kid's childcare arrangements. The fees at that stage were $2,000. In 2021, the kid's childcare said that he would be waitlisted from promoting to the next level because of quota issues. In 2021, Mother told Father she was going to switch childcares to another childcare centre that had no waitlist. The location was also more convenient (15-20 minutes less travell… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 08:14 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter