| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Reddit White Knight humiliatedWhy did you quote that part, but not the very next sentence where I said, "I'm not saying that's what happened in this case"? | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 03:08 PM |
| 0 | Reddit White Knight humiliatedI don't think that you're right about the law, because (at least in some places, maybe most) there's the idea of reasonable force. A person has the right to defend himself with reasonable force. I don't think he has the right to get retribution. So if it's reasonable to think that he needed to slug her in order to protect himself, then you're right that he's legally in the clear. But if he did not think that he needed to protect himself, or if he used more force than necessary to do so, then he … | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 01:40 PM |
| 1 | Reddit White Knight humiliatedLaws are different in different places, but in most places, if a reasonable person would expect to be attacked in a given scenario, and a reasonable person wouldn't think that there was a way to escape or defuse the attack, then he's legally allowed to use force first. I'm not saying that's what happened in this case. I'm only talking about the false idea that you can never legally hit first. The next thing is that the law often takes into account the amount of force needed to end an attack. And… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 01:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter