TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skankerhunt42 Archive

View 4 posts and 36 comments by skankerhunt42 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well then, since you're trying to get hung up on definitions now, in an attempt to distract from the fact you just got caught straight up lying, then by your own lack of definition of what you even mean by 'food studies', your statement that they are bullshit is absolutely meaningless and itself bullshit. You're not only asserting things without evidence, you are doing it without even definitions, hence it can also be dismissed without evidence. Lol. I specifically said food studies and you said…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 11:46 PM
1

So you don't know what I mean by food studies and you still argue against it? You're just arguing to argue. A vegan diet is dangerous because it's not nutritious. It increases blood pressure when compared to other diets and increases weight. Weight is also a good indicator of blood pressure and diabetes. A vegan diet isn't healthy.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:44 PM
1

I didn't say that medical studies are bullshit, I said food studies are bullshit. Please don't put words into my mouth. A vegan diet is not the best diet for blood pressure. The DASH diet does better and it includes lean protein and dairy which is missing from a vegan diet. Keep in mind, you brought up blood pressure. I brought up low cholesterol is associated with death. I don't eat lab created supplements, because my diet has enough nutrients.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:33 PM
1

Food studies are bullshit. If a vegan diet was so good at lowering blood pressure, why is the DASH diet suggested instead of a vegan diet? Because it has calcium, one of the many nutrients that vegan diets are missing. Where do vegans get their B12? From a lab... because vegan diets can't sustain human life.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 08:45 PM
1

Vegan food has a lot of sugar and starch. This causes a lot of problems with high blood pressure and diabetes. This diet increases the morbidity rate in men and decreases boners. If you Google low LDL and morbidity, it'll surprise you. What's surprising is the feminist diet is more devastating to women, especially if they're pregnant. Men can subsist on bullshit diets for years, but "bullshit dieting women" fall apart within days. And it's always the most obese women bullsplaining their fucking …
/r/MensRights20/01/18 07:48 AM
1

While the statement was ironic, it doesn't detract from the fact that the sample size isn't significant so no conclusions can be drawn from such a study.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:06 PM
1

Evidently, you didn't get it. "39 people" is a fact directly from the article, proving I read it.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:30 PM
1

I did read it, I quoted directly from the article.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:08 PM
1

Why read it? It's not even a study, it's based on 39 people, the sample size is way too small.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:42 PM
1

Nah, that's fucked up. Unwanted doesn't mean unenthusiastic. No means no.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:17 PM
1

I kinda lol'd : My findings indicate men are motivated to have unwanted sex through a process where they try to avoid embarrassing themselves or their partner and seek to behave in interpretable ways. In particular, men consent to unwanted sex because accepting all opportunities for sexual activity is a widely accepted way to perform masculinity.” "Motivated to have unwanted sex."... Could I apply that to women? "Motivated to have unwanted sex?" Why interpret that as something other than rape? T…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 10:32 AM
2

This is great, now the divorce industry will finally pander to men and men will get to spend 105% of their household's wealth. /s
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:56 PM
5

I googled the question and found this interesting study. It doesn't appear to say anything new, but it is a study: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=156986 The results indicate that, while men and women are treated differently by the criminal justice system, these differences largely favor women. It is true that women are less likely than men to commit crimes, but self-report figures indicate that official statistics exaggerate the difference, women also tend to commit diff…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:19 PM
35

All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others. ~Animal Farm
/r/MensRights05/10/17 03:32 PM
–

Reddit is strong about virtue signalling that pedophilia and hemophilia is wrong. Pedantically, these terms merely explain attraction, not action. I think most pedophiles have never touched a child or even collected child pornography. All pedophiles are sexually attracted to children under 13. It doesn't mean they acted upon their sexual attraction. Some might point out pederast. Sure, that's an action geared towards male homosexuality. A pederast is an adult male engaging in sexual acts towards…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:41 AM
3

Kris Bucher and Jessica Fuller is another case where the boy specifically said no and now has to pay child support to his rapist.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 08:10 PM
1

If CPS tells the police that a child is in danger inside a home, the police don't have any reason to doubt CPS which gives the police probable cause to enter the premises and remove the child. This is called exigent circumstances. This makes sense when children are in actual danger. If the police did not remove a child from a dangerous household and the police knew the household was dangerous, the community would be quite outraged. Here's a news story where CPS did nothing: http://www.nbcdfw.com…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:21 PM
–

Unfortunately, child protective services isn't considered to be a law enforcement agency and there is no violation of the 4th amendment. A CPS person can show up at your door and you can tell them to fuck off and they can instruct law enforcement to invade your home and take your kids. It's a loophole. Be very careful with CPS, it's an anti-family government organization that can fuck your life up with no government oversight or accountability.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:08 AM
–

The sentences given to women for "sex" crimes should also be given to men. I say two years jail sounds fair, now give that same sentence to men.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:52 AM
1

I think sexism would be stereotyping on the basis of sex. Even if the stereotype is true (or based on an unflattering statistic), then it is sexism. This would make "sexism" a neutral term rather an identity politics term.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:07 PM
–

I think that the answer is going to be sexist no matter what. Men commit suicide more than women. I could say that men chose more violent methods of suicide and that would be a sexist statement, even though it is a true statement. I think it's true that women are more prone to depression, but isn't attention seeking a coping mechanism for depression? This would support Mens-Advocate's assertion that females may simply be wanting attention. Simply put, just because a statement is sexist doesn't m…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:33 PM
1

Thank you for intelligently addressing all my points. I found this particularly interesting: If children aren't entitled to money and aren't allowed to earn money how do you expect them to survive? Like it or not, the responsibility of the child lies with the living parents or guardians so somebody has to take care of them. I actually think it's wrong that children can't at the very least get a part time job and earn their own money, especially if they're from poor families, as long as it doesn'…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:44 AM
–

Food must be cheaper in Europe. $60 a month is about $2 a day which is less than I pay for my kid's school lunch.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:04 PM
1

Speaking from my own experience, I don't think it's horseshit. My parents divorced when I was young and my mother never paid a cent in child support. She fits the legal definition of a deadbeat parent. I never considered my mom to be a deadbeat. My dad simply didn't need her money. I consider it immoral to take money from someone and impoverish them when you don't need the money. The legal definition of a deadbeat parent is “parents of either gender who have freely chosen not to be supportive pa…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:18 PM
3

I'm pretty sure the SAT does correlate with income levels. That's why it's been nicknamed the "Student Affluence Test" https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/5r1f0t/sat_the_student_affluence_test_oc/
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:20 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:32 PM
–

I thought she said she was threatening to falsely claim rape in order to get something out of the driver. I'm at work and can't watch the video, but if that's true, then that's extortion, which is illegal. Extortion does not usually require that the offender threaten to commit a criminal act as long as the threat attempts to obtain money, property, or to force the victim to act against their will.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:31 PM
3

Nothing pisses a feminist off more than a gender traitor. Feminists seem to harbor a special kind of hatred for any female that would dare to stand up for MRAs.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:23 PM
–

It sounds like a bad idea to force stay-at-home parents into the labor market. Doing that would saturate the labor supply which would depress wages for everyone. At least in the U.S., we don't have a productivity problem that requires an increased workforce.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 08:26 PM
-1

It takes two have a conspiracy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal) In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:04 PM
2

That same politician introduced a bill that basically said women who had postpartum psychosis can use the condition as a legal defense for killing their infants. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Farrar In 2009, she proposed a bill that would recognize postpartum psychosis as a defense for mothers who kill their infants. Under the terms of the proposed legislation, if jurors concluded that a mother's "judgment was impaired as a result of the effects of giving birth or the effects of lactatio…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:39 PM
–

In your opinion, I made a stupid decision, but lets do away with personal attacks. Our discussion has been pretty civil. I'd like to continue that. The 53% divorce rate includes couples who have divorced multiple times. People who have divorced multiple times are included in that stat. First time married people are less likely to divorce, the divorce rate for people on their first marriage is much lower than the aggregate divorce rate. As I said before, if you're afraid of alimony, then marriage…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:20 AM
–

The reward is double income with only a marginal increase in expenditures. Another reward is increased health benefits, both mental and physical. A happy marriage is worth about 100k according to these economists: http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/10/magazine/magbr_valentines_loveandmoney_0502/index.htm?section=money_pf Physical health: Marriage and health are closely related. Married people experience lower morbidity and mortality across such diverse health threats as cancer, heart attacks, and surg…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:47 AM
1

http://time.com/4575495/divorce-rate-nearly-40-year-low/ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/u-s-divorce-rate-lowest-35-years-marriage-bit-article-1.2878130 Yup, lowest divorce rate in decades and marriages are increasing.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 07:05 PM
–

I wonder what risk are we trying to mitigate. The risk of being sued and paying a lot of money? If that's the case, then not getting married isn't going solve the problem. You can still get sued for palimony. Is the solution not to live in the same hous as a woman? Getting married has plenty of legal benefits. If a spouse dies, their assets automatically transfer. You can transfer unlimited gifts to your spouse. Social security and retirement benefits can be applied to the spouse. Health decisio…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:03 AM
–

I don't think it's much of a risk if the wife makes more than the husband, and this occurring much more frequently. Women have been getting college degrees and sometimes they become the breadwinner. Thus, more and more men are getting alimony from their ex-wives. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-divorce-alimony-men-idUSBRE9BN0AW20131224
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter