TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skanking_lawyer Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by skanking_lawyer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Americans have this motto that "those who can't do, teach" and immediately someone like me who isn't American has to ask himself "why?" Why would a country choose to hire the least qualified people to teach the next generation and for a meager salary no less. Couple of reasons: Nearly all local school are funded via property taxes. The are notorious for increases property taxes to pay for infrastructure improvements, more and more administrators, and silliness like i-pads for every student. Teac…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:29 PM
2

The problem here is that the SJW minority is using an extraordinarily broad definition of "rape" that is at odds with what most people understand the word to mean and with how the criminal offense of rape is defined under the law.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 03:31 PM
4

Right...but the law does not provide a remedy for every wrong. Without evidence, crimes no unpunished. True, her testimony in a court of law constitutes evidence, but if he denies the charges (as he likely will), no criminal case will be brought because there is no way to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did what she is alleging. However, this case seems unique in that from her description, it appears that other were on set and witnesses the incident and "did nothing to stop it." Police w…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:32 AM
1

I said that it's one of the contributors to social and political divisiveness that causes an empire to tear itself apart from the inside and leave it vulnerable to foreign invasion. Ok, well I agree on that. But you have to remember any "feminism" in Rome was very much limited by the fact that legally the paterfamilia could kill his daughter for premarital sex/adultery.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 04:42 PM
8

Your analysis is off on a couple of major points. Empire decline is not the result of feminism. Feminism may be a symptom of decline. Empires declines for several reasons, including: 1) defeated in war (Persia); 2) natural disaster destroys economic system (Egypt), 3) poor economic policies eventually bankrupt the state; 4) loss of legitimacy of ruling class; and 5) comprehensive systems failure Comprehensive systems failure is often combined with some of 1-4. Comprehensive system failure theory…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:21 PM
7

I think part of it is value of time. Other part is just being hardened to the shittiness of people and the world.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 03:25 AM
1

Can you give me a single example of a man like this who couldn't also be described as an " MIB"? Sure, college buddy of mine who was "alpha as fuck" back in the day and slayed pussy turned completely beta when he got married and had kids. Wife orders him around the house; he is confined to his man-cave most of the time, and spends his evenings drinking himself to sleep after the kids are in bed. It is just solely your frame holding you back at this point I don't disagree. I have yet to figure ou…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 02:07 AM
1

I disagree. This post is useful in determining and analyzing where some people's beta behavior comes from. For some people, they get lazy over time. Others have fallen into the societal feminist world view through constant indoctrination. I think MIBS are the "hard cases" and betaness is hardwired into us. I lift weights, read the books, developed a MAPP, and still can't shake the fact that deep down I will always be a Beta. This post is useful to me in that it explains just how far down the rab…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 01:44 AM
2

I'm also a manipulative liar. $65,000---Do you try and change that, recognizing it is a product of shitty upbringing or just "roll with it" and say, fuck it, its who I am?
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 01:37 AM
1

Add into the mix an absent/abusive father and 18 years of catholic indoctrination....no wonder why i am so fucked up.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 01:33 AM
2

Not in that exact situation, but many of my married friends are. I'll I can say is "fuck man, that sucks."
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 01:00 AM
11

Thats trivial. I'm married and nothing I say is ever taken at face value. "Could you use less onion next time" = "The dinner was a failure and my wife is a horrible cook." "I'm quiet because I do not have anything to say" = "My wife is uninteresting and unimportant to me. Don't I want to hear about her day?" etc., etc. ad naseum. Everything you say to a woman will be interpreted in terms of how it relates to her feelings. You can either learn to lie and play her game or just be brutally honest a…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 12:56 AM
17

With age comes perspective. My 25-year old self would agree, as I did something very similar with an ex-fiance, although not as elaborate, at that age. I had a great need for vengeance. Today me would just be like, fuck it, get out, bye.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/15 12:23 AM
8

Ok, may be generational difference then. Being an old geezer, I, perhaps underestimated the exposure the video would get. I don't ever watch people's private channels on youtube except when linked on reddit. So, if this is the modern equivalent of dropping pictures of your finance in bed with someone else during the engagement dinner party with family and friends, I stand corrected.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 11:48 PM
64

Also note the fact that he says at the beginning that he has had this happen to him before with "Becky" The real sad part is that this guy is probably going to have it happen again if he thinks candles, music, rose petals, and love poems is what makes women swoon.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 11:45 PM
344

See, the thing is, with this particularly brand of skank, she probably HATES the fact that he went through all this dopey romantic shit. I know the guy's intent was to show her all the "emotional investment" she was going to be missing out on. On some girls that "slipped up" that might work. But, you can see from the look on her face when she first sits down, she is thinking "I actually have to read through all this shit and put up with this nonsense just to get the ring?; ughh, whatevs" All she…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/15 08:57 PM
3

This article confuses 2 issues. First is the issue of male friends. Second is the issue of "sharing problems" with said friends. Like many men, I have 2-3 very close friends--my old college buds--we see each other only 1 every 5 years or so. We went through a lot of shit together, so are very close. I have several male acquaintances that I hang out with in my various hobbies. None are really "friends" in that when we hang out, we are all just trying to have fun and forget about life's problems. …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:28 PM
2

Unless its a blond 22 year old teacher and a 12 yer old boy. Then its just a good time. /[scarcasm]
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:20 PM
9

Just for a total mind fuck, realize that the evidentiary standard for overturning a college football call is more stringent than the standard used to expel someone for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:14 AM
3

Can't write love notes, but mandatory training on how to put on a condom and use dental dams.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:46 PM
1

My wife makes around what I make, so If there was a divorce, yes, I would lose a lot in the separation of assets, but I would not wind up with huge maintenance payments. My wife and I are both busy professionals and work within walking distance of each other, so there would be no reason not to allow for a 50/50 custody split. I also kept all of my premarital accounts separate and have not spent any of the money in the accounts since we were married, so I would get to keep those (as the funds wer…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:44 PM
1

I mean, not when saying "hello" to them on the street is tantamount to rape. Stop literally raping me with your eyes!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:45 PM
3

legally duress means threat of physical harm. In feminist/pop culture, duress means emotional "pressure" or "persuading."
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:18 PM
5

They will enable people who enthusiastically participated in sex to deny it later and punish their partners. They will function as protective legislation that encourages weakness among those they protect. They will install traditional social norms of male responsibility and female helplessness. All of these will be the costs we pay for the benefits affirmative consent requirements deliver. Exactly. As a fellow attorney, I am quite distressed with the legal ramifications of these laws. In my view…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:16 PM
2

Islamic death metal?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:08 PM
1

No doubt things are bad, but it is possible to have a fulfilling marriage. I married someone of like mind, education, and values. It isn't perfect (nothing is), but it works. We support each other and have a wonderful son. Yes, we have had rough spots, but we have weathered through them so far. So, while I completely understand the aversion to marriage, it is not impossible to find someone with whom a marriage will work. The key in my case is that I did not meet my wife online, by friends, or in…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:07 PM
2

or date women who want to settle down and marry and have kids before the check has even arrived. When I was dating, I remember a first date where the woman asked me straight up 5 minutes into the date: "So, are you just window shopping"? I noped the fuck out of there.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:59 PM
20

And where is the outcry for the hard-working, blue -collar men who can't find a mate because they are only good for a couple of one-offs with rich "sophisticated," sex-in-the-city type harpies who are having fun "slumming it" for a weekend?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:24 PM
1

they usually are styled to look like fancy dress "Fancy dress" over here means "expensive outfit" as opposed to whimsical attire.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:39 PM
11

Non-sequitur. There is no "commitment" in a marriage under no-fault divorce laws. Men are willing to commit. Women aren't. Men are not willing to agree to "commit" to a "while you make me happy" arrangement.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:47 PM
2

I am interested in exploring legal mechanisms by which 2 like-minded people can contract around existing law and legally bind themselves to a lifelong marriage, with whatever opt-out terms they want (infidelity/abuse, etc.)
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:45 PM
1

You obviously failed to learn that ONLY WHITE MEN can be racist/sexist because there is no "ist" without power. White mean have all the power; ergo only white men can be racist/sexist.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:23 PM
1

"Boys are seen as defective girls." Pretty much sums up feminism.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:20 PM
1

Feminism has become a parody of itself. I wonder if the author considers the "emotional labor" of men putting up with a harpy nagging them 24/7 to do useless shit like buy a birthday card for their great aunt they never see or care about
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:16 PM
2

Just further evidence that in their view "everything is oppressive/racist/misogynist--you just need to point it out.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:04 PM
11

men are not "scared of commitment." They are scared that their would-be wives value and understand commitment. There is no "commitment" if you wive can willy-nilly leave you. I wish the idea of contract marriages would gain more ground--i.e. people entering into contracts where they disclaim no fault divorce and agree to stiff penalties (liquidates damages) for breaking the contract. Really no different than entering into an arbitration agreement.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:02 PM
8

Men rarely leave because "the grass is greener." I swear, some women look at marriage as just an excuse to have a big party and achieve status. The actual vows/promises have no meaning. Or, they may mean something AT THE TIME, but it seems the vast majority of women are quite fine with saying "oh, I don't feel that way anymore, I am leaving." Do people even contemplate that marriage is supposed to be an irrevocable bond for life?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:59 PM
12

Or they realize the reasons they liked their husbands 10 years ago when they were both kids are the reasons they can't stand them now because they went for the "cool" guy instead of choosing wisely But the reverse is also true. Around 40, wives who "chose wisely" and settled begin to cheat on their "boring" husbands with the nearest Chad at the gym.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:37 PM
17

There is a vast disparity between what men want and what modern women want. A modern woman wants a loving, caring, good-looking, successful, rich man that is friends with all her besties and that "brings joy"--i.e. feelz--to her life. A man wants a semi-good looking, responsible, RESPECTFUL, non-skanky, FAITHFUL, TRUSTWORTHY woman to raise a family with and who will stand by his side in the long term when shit hits the fan; and someone who will fuck more than once a month after marriage.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:11 PM
3

I am very lucky to be an intellectual loner introvert who married a kind, trustworthy intellectual loner introvert. Marriage is not perfect, but there is simply no way I could imagine marrying any of the 20-30 yr old vapid, vacuous sluts I see walking around glued to their facebook and tinder accounts.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:58 AM
6

Jesus.. Finally a study by a reputable institution confirmation that which everyone actually in the work force already knows: The "wage gap" is due primarily to differences professional specialties and hours worked. If you control for such variables, the "gap" shrinks to about 4%. I have seen other studies attributing any latent differences to reluctance to negotiate salary.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:43 AM
2

Yes...only attractive men can be cheerleaders...no creeps allowed.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:49 PM
1

To be male is to act upon the world. Bravo, sir, bravo.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 10:36 PM
1

What about: Oh...you actually look like a hag without your 3 layers of makeup, push up bra, and high heels?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:04 PM
1

No, that's only a vocal minority of idiots out there. The legal system does not treat rape that way, and most people don't believe in that insane definition either. Tell that to a 20 year old college sophomore. Doesn't matter how the DA will treat it. You will be kicked out of school, branded a rapist, and have your life ruined. And, this is more than a "vocal minority." The whole purpose of these "consent classes" is to brainwash an entire generation into believing this garbage. Then, in 15 yea…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:43 PM
23

Jeez, I don't know. Maybe it has something to do with being told we are dumb, useless, oppressive, rapists, perverts, and nothing more than walking ATMs on a daily basis by tv, radio, movies, media, and college administrators. If you happen to be a smart, introvert you have no value to society except to give your resources to women. You are mocked for not being attractive enough to get a mate, told you are "creepy". If you do secure a mate, she cheats on you, takes your kids, and leaves you brok…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:39 PM
15

Fuck. I was a cheerleader in HS, along with other of my weightlifting buddies. What is more manly than working out, shouting chants, and putting your hands up girls skirts on a daily basis?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:32 PM
1

Sounds like you've gone into the proper field. I dont like it; but its the nature of the beast. The same thing is true in finance, banking, and most corporations.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 10:48 PM
2

Who gives a shit? Get your piece of the pie and go home.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 10:08 PM
1

But you are essentially arguing that talent always overcomes ambition. In my field, you can be the best damn attorney, but if no one hires you, it doesn't matter. When real money is on the line, my partners will lie, cheat, and steal to get their share. Indeed, in order to become a partner to begin with, you have to successfully navigate the lower ranks of associates. Its not good enough to succeed, your competition must fail because there is only a limited number of spots on the ladder up. Thus…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 10:07 PM
1

But in that case you could never seduce anybody That is a good point. I don't think the feminists would disagree with that. Under their logic, you shouldn't have to "seduce" or "convince" someone to have sex; they either want to bang on on the spot or not. To them "seduce" implies "trick." I have seen some pay that the can be no true consent if their is "seduction" because the person is acting against their true wishes.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:01 PM
1

yes, but not rapists.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:03 PM
1

I think this girl (and probably other like her) were raised by prudish parents, had self-esteem issues, and was just "putting out" to keep the guys happy and be popular. She literally undressed, got on the bed, and laid on her back the whole time. Did not want oral sex. Just laid there and took it with a blank stare up at the ceiling.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:42 PM
2

You can't "accidentally" rape somebody. But that is EXACTLY what is being taught on campuses. "You are a rapist and don't even know it." Right along with what they tell the girls "If it feels like rape [i.e. you feel bad] it is rape." It all boils down to does the girl have hurt feelings.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:33 PM
1

Rigidly passive and silent? Rubbish. Not rubbish. Promiscuous female classmate in lawschool was referred to as "C.F."--cadaverus fuck.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:31 PM
2

The problem with the tea video. It does not address: I did not like the tea, so, in retrospect I wish you had not given it to me. Had I known it would taste so bad, I wouldn't have agreed to drink it. You misrepresented the contents of the tea. I though you were providing me with top shelf leaves and instead you give me tea ash that the proles drink. I retroactively withdraw my consent to drink the tea. Even though I seemed in control of my faculties, agreed to drink tea, and seemed to enjoy it,…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:43 PM
2

Its not the "skinny" per se. Its the lack of proportions and curves.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 03:41 PM
10

It is quite simple. Rape has literally been redefined. It no longer retains its LEGAL definition as forcible sexual penetration without consent. A few days ago I had an argument with someone on the r/relationships sub that genuinely believed that it is "rape" if you engage in quid pro quo sex. [in response to a post about a student whose teacher agreed to give him better grades if he slept with her. The student didn't really want to sleep with his teacher, but wanted the good grades and so slept…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:11 PM
7

Am I the only one that does not think she is "smoking hot." Thigh gap, no hips, small tits. Not my cup of tea.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 02:42 PM
1

Yes, you are RESPECTED by your peers by taking advantage of people. Its a winner's club. You prove how alpha you are by displaying how you take advantage of the wage earners, moralists, and "honest men."
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 12:35 AM
1

DERP...didn't read the comments first
/r/MarriedRedPill02/11/15 11:55 PM
3

I thought you were going to say your wife was being bitchy, so you went on a fishing trip at 2:00am.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/11/15 11:54 PM
7

But it's still important to genuinely EARN shit. First of all, you have to give respect where it is deserved, then you will get it in return, when it is deserved. In my experience, "earning" only gets you so far. When you start talking about REAL money, you need to steal, blackmail, cajole, or otherwise TAKE IT from someone else using whatever leverage you have.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 11:49 PM
1

women still want to marry a man that makes more than themselves. But, I constantly encounter female lawyers, doctors, and corp execs that are married to younger "tradesmen"--carpenters, welders, etc...I am not talking about business owners. Just some dude who doesn't shave, and has occasional employment.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 11:43 PM
1

We went from a single 40 hour job being enough for a family of 5 in the 1950s to now needing 2 40+ hour jobs being needed for a family of 4 in the 2010s. My ultimate point is that women entering the workforce was a major (but not sole) contributor to that reality Well, we agree on that. [Aside: I intentionally attempted to non-politicize the supply side economics discussion by stating what the theory posits and expressed no opinion as to its actual effects. I don't think anyone contends that sup…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 08:04 PM
1

You: 1) implied that supply side economics does not work and 2) that consumer spending has stayed the same since women entered the work force ("women were having their needs met but financed by other people"). As to the first point: Supply side economics posits that by decreasing the tax rates on businesses and costs of regulation (and other barriers to production), the drive to maximize profits will result in businesses expanding their operations with the extra cash/lower barriers, such that mo…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 07:33 PM
1

when they entered the workforce demand did not scale 1:1 with the influx of labor. One would not necessarily expect it to be so. Until very recently, if a family unit was having its needs met, extra income was saved. Also, a greater portion of a family's earnings is now consumed by taxes. Thus the relative value of labor (wages) decreased. No disagreement. Larger workforce = greater supply of labor and reduced price of labor. Those demands were simply being financed by other people. The "demands…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 06:55 PM
2

As a society how do we communicate that we value the feminine as much as the masculine? The ancients had this figured out. Monogamy, religion, and public shaming. It is perfectly possible to control for hypergamy. But, you need to structure your society in a fashion such that female exposure to true "alphas" are limited...both physically, and situationally. Most alphas were out fighting to expand the kingdom. Access to domesticated alphas was limited through heavy indoctrination of women, and th…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 06:31 PM
1

Sorry, this analysis is wrong. Fails to account for all of the cheap imported shit women buy on credit. Shit they couldn't purchase without their own credit history and jobs. When women stayed at home, most men still ran the finances and could control spending. Once 2 income families became ubiquitous, it became far easier to spend "our" money, even if the wife was making less. Your reliance on GDP is misplaced, as it fails to account for two key facts: 1) most women went into service jobs...not…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 06:27 PM
10

Listen and believe!
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:39 PM
6

These anti-rape campaigns are so anti-feminist it is unbelievable. My wife, who is a paragon of old school equity feminism, remarked that such posters are: "Ridiculous. They imply a woman has no power to act and is a helpless person that needs protection from all the evil men around them." She went on to say: "When I was in college, all the females attended sessions on avoid dangerous situations and stand up for themselves; You know, don't go to a party alone, leave with a friend, make sure peop…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:17 PM
3

Feminism actually is about equality. No, its about promoting woman's interests ahead of men and championing a de facto socialist society where equality of OUTCOMES matters instead of equality of OPPORTUNITY.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:26 PM
8

Almost as if my mother just didn't really know how to raise a boy. Mothers do NOT know how to "raise" a boy to be a man. They can comfort, protect, and care for a boy. But it takes a man to make a boy a man. My father was absent most of my life, so I never learned basic lessons I needed to. I picked up everything through trial and error in my 20s and 30s and could have saved myself a lot of headaches, heartache, and money had some man told me how the world and women work.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:48 PM
5

Every single one of these pieces focuses on the survivor/accuser's "feelings." I said it before and will say it again. Objective reality, evidence, proof matters not anymore. All that counts is that a student "felt" raped.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:59 PM
1

So, according to her men are evil if they are: a) disinterested after learning of her radical views and have a realistic appreciation of the risk she will claim she was raped in any sexual encounter; but also when b) they "say all the right things" and still want to have sex, because thats weird; or when c) they protest that they are not rapists. What other possible outcome does she expect when she starts out a conversation that way? Also, does she not realize that Tinder is used almost exclusiv…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:36 PM
5

Weel, under English law "rape" is defined to require PIV penetration, so legally, women cannot "rape"--although they can commit sexual assault
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:32 PM
2

I feel so lucky to have married a woman that rejects this SJW "all men are rapists"; "i;m entitled to your money" B.S. If my wife ever dies or divorces me, I dont think I will even contemplate another marriage for a second. I have seen too many of my friends' lives ruined by women they thought were fun, flirty, and sweet, only to turn into coldfish hags that demand more and more of their money and time.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:31 PM
3

Again, I was said to be derailing and not helpful. "Not helpful" = "you are not validating my feelings"
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:18 PM
5

This comment sums it up I think Marc's decision to keep his generosity towards your family hidden from you was a mistake that kept him from being able to properly communicate in your love language, and since he's reading this right now I hope he learns not to do so in the future. Did you read that "communicate in your love language." I.e. gifts and pretty things = love.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 04:51 PM
18

No no. The magic happens as soon as they "identify" as a trans woman.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:23 PM
1

Don't you guys understand that you are raping girls without even knowing it? You have to be made to learn that if she feels she was raped, then she was raped.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:57 PM
4

TL;dr. I am a slut and feel bad about it and dont understand why....must be patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:38 PM
11

More proof that all that matters in these rape tribunals is how the "victim" feels. Actual "evidence"--photos, texts, testimony from 3rd party witnesses, is irrelevant. And, this case highlights the flaw with "affirmative consent" in that one can say "yes" but claim they didn;t really mean it or felt "coerced" into saying yes. "I dint feel like i could say no."
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter