TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skatlols Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by skatlols on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Why you acting like a wuss because a woman tells you you don't look like someone that would choke and spit on her? Seriously, what is wrong with you? Do you want to be that person? If so, why? If not, why do their comments matter? Why do you even want to be with such girls? They may have daddy issues, but you certainly have your own lot getting insecure about an insane person calling you "not insane enough" and reacting that way.
/r/seduction03/04/22 06:32 PM
-3

Wrong.
/r/seduction31/01/22 07:34 PM
0

That's one: "What are some open ended questions to keep the conversation going?"
/r/seduction30/09/21 12:33 PM
2

"girls" Are you saying Indian girls aren't attracted to Indian guys or are you just intending to go for White girls? I think I already know the answer. Personally, I wouldn't complain that black chicks aren't into me since I'm not black. Maybe go for a nice Indian girl? If you're in the Netherlands, so will a bunch of them. But it's politically incorrect to say so.
/r/seduction09/09/21 02:20 PM
-1

Lol. Why would the trolls even know you're White and 6 feet tall? Why did you think it was useful for you to mention that information? This is Reddit. Ever heard the expression "le Redditor moment"? I wouldn't be caught dead telling a bunch of dysgenic "egalitarians" that I'm a good looking straight White guy.
/r/seduction04/09/21 02:23 AM
4

"how would you lead back in?" Are you just relating an anecdote or actively seeking advice? Because you said so yourself: she's moved cities. And Nashville is 7 hours from Chicago. Why are you trying to have a go at a girl 7 hours away that you knew so little that you did not even know she was engaged?
/r/seduction14/01/21 03:03 AM
4

"If I say just be yourself it doesnt mean stop improving on yourself youre fine the way you are." Yet you had to make a post clarifying it. Lol.
/r/seduction04/01/21 01:58 PM
3

So much this. Gets tiring seeing girls with daddy issues or a bazillion male friends post here saying to a dude that clearly knows his stuff (OP): "nah, you're wrong, lol" with lame arse arguments that are there solely to hide the fact they feel slighted that these red flags applied to them.
/r/seduction18/11/20 01:58 PM
0

"we need to police /Seduction! The reality of dating is offensive!"
/r/seduction18/11/20 01:55 PM
1

"take advantage of it". Serious question: are you out there to find an actual relationship or just get your sausage wet? There's so much wrong with your points... For instance, you saying that since most girls have daddy issues we should just deal with it because otherwise the dating pool would be smaller (and?), or that as an older man you like women with ex-boyfriend issues as they usually treat you "better" since they think you're "different" (even though you say "take advantage of it") lmao
/r/seduction18/11/20 01:54 PM
1

The post is called "red flags". How is what you're describing not a red flag? An example: if a girl had a very violent and abusive childhood, and does not want to talk about it, how do you think she'll fair in a relationship given her past and how it'll have influenced her opinions on men, family, kids, discipline, etc.? And if she had extensive therapy, why would she not be able to speak about her past? Guys, pls pls pls pls don't date crazy, even if she has a tragic past. You cannot "save" her…
/r/seduction18/11/20 01:41 PM
6

King.
/r/seduction18/11/20 01:35 PM
2

Monogamy is a choice. You asking this question is like asking "can you not do drugs?" or "can you quit doing drugs?" Yes.
/r/seduction14/10/20 07:36 PM
1

The more partners you have, the harder it is to pair bond. The risks of divorce exponentially grow.
/r/seduction17/05/20 10:55 PM
-2

I appreciate the sentiment, but the logical conclusion for such an advice will likely result in people losing their best and most fertile years to introspection and, let's be honest, wh*ring around. Particularly detrimental to women whose fertility skyrocket down at 30, and, really, to anyone given that guys also end up with a less viable sperm and more likelihood of a trisomic child, etc. I know this may sound grave, and ridiculous, but look around you: all those careerist arguably tried to wor…
/r/seduction17/05/20 07:20 PM
0

Ok. I'll remember to tell my pastor not to call me "dear", or the 40s something female neighbour. First you ascribed condescension to my person, now you're implying I am feigning ignorance. Why don't we just leave the conversation to where it is?
/r/seduction05/03/20 07:50 PM
1

A Karen is someone that passes moral judgement. I already mentioned promiscuity is wrong and that moral relativism is simply nihilism. I have thus no problem being called a Karen. Enough with telling everyone that they're perfect little snowflakes and everything they do is marvelous and a-ok even when it's detrimental to their psyche, their sexual health, and them leading a meaningful life.
/r/seduction05/03/20 07:20 PM
0

If it "makes it seem like a personal attack" then your statement that I am "using a condescending word like "dear"" is wrong. Either I am being condescending (and hence it is a personal attack), or I am not. You are the one ascribing condescension to the word "dear". I am addressing a young virgin lad that thinks that promiscuity may be an avenue as "dear", yes. You thinking that the word is automatically condescending says more about you and your intentions than I.
/r/seduction05/03/20 06:40 PM
0

I could tell you weren't big on religion. Like said, your statement on sexuality was one of moral relativism. It's pretty simple, dear: you implied that your sexuality is dependent only on yourself and not on society's or your peers' judgment. You may have solely meant "opinion", but "judgment" is not semantically the same as "opinion". Divorce rates and money making are just another example of how truth exists despite your own wants for it not to. How as society not failed you? You mention bein…
/r/seduction05/03/20 05:57 PM
2

Science says that having had multiple partners lead to weaker pair bonding. This is not an opinion or "judgment", but a fact. Science also says that divorce rates are much higher when the woman makes more money than the man, no matter how much this figure may displease feminists. Your position is one of relativism ("anything I do sexually is okay") and an expression of you feeling frustration in a society that judges, mistreats you and conditions you in regards to virginity and sex. Your virgini…
/r/seduction05/03/20 05:15 PM
5

I agree. They may say I'm a simp or beta coping, but I am sad that a lot of users on here focus on trying to get as much sex with random girls as possible. This is bad for your psyche and your ability to bond long-term with a woman. Unfortunately, it feels that those that want to learn about seduction to find a good woman are in the minority, and anyone that hasn't f*cked hundreds of women is deemed as not knowing what he's talking about on the matters of seduction. Think about it: the only way …
/r/seduction05/03/20 04:13 PM
2

Looks legit, lol
/r/seduction04/02/20 08:14 PM
1

So you're taking advice from the same generation because of which Zoomers and Xers cannot own land or a house? The same ones that made maybe 2 kids, if stretching it, and invented helicopter parenting? Yes. Please have under the renewal rate an amount of children, decry global warming, while also arguing that living in Western nations is more so a right than a privilege for all of humanity. You're not ready for the real redpill but here it is: the same elite that pushes you towards promiscuous s…
/r/seduction04/02/20 02:13 PM
1

So you think your purpose in life is to have casual sex with strangers, as a man? "Beta" is not just synonym to a lack of social skills. Having goals besides promiscuous sex does not entail an "alpha" personality either. In this fallen world, knowing game can be helpful for the extremely awkward, but for most everyone else, it just fogs their judgment and maks their best years fade away in what can only be deemed as highs, as "fun", rather than joy or happiness. I never was a crazy good player, …
/r/seduction04/02/20 01:44 PM
1

"put her in her place". Dude, does she have daddy's issues or something, and do you really wanna go there? These type of girls are good fucks but not girlfriend material. You said you wanted a girlfriend, not a fuckbuddy. There is no excuse whatsoever, much less "it was just a shit test!" to her telling you "will you stop fuckin mumbling?" Like the other guy said, there's a difference between a shit test and being a bitch. Are you also just be like "I gotta be alpha and pass the shit test!" if d…
/r/seduction27/12/19 08:02 PM
3

Woodcarving. Knife sharpening. Collecting straight razors. Make kombucha. Make my own deodorant, hair pomade, beard wax, etc.
/r/seduction27/12/19 05:04 AM
2

I'm not gonna give you a quickie because you're negging me, you know.
/r/seduction23/12/19 11:08 PM
1

I have like 400 matches on tinder, and I do not put much effort in it, granted, but: I never ever match with girls that are 19, 20, 21, etc in Canada. Youngest was like 25. I'm 31. I matched with tons of 18s, 19s, etc. abroad. I went out with girls that were 6s to 7.5s. Fucked them all except one. Not quality girls though that I would like to date. Tl;dr: tinder is still crap.
/r/seduction23/12/19 03:51 PM
1

What ya think?
/r/seduction13/12/19 06:19 PM
2

???
/r/seduction11/12/19 01:06 AM
7

Do you want sex or do you want sex with multiple men? You can have sex multiple times a day with the same person, especially when you are in a committed relationship. What's more, I think you are conflating "off putting" and "awkward"/"not serious". If a girl walks up to me and says very directly she wants to bang me, my first reaction would not be to think she's joking. I can only imagine someone with very low self-esteem jumping to the conclusion that it is a "joke". That being said, for most,…
/r/seduction10/12/19 07:34 PM
3

Dude. I don't even approach, but: the journey. The experience. You may not live happily ever after but you will have learned lots. Right now your outcome dependent, and mistakenly think you have any control in your life on things other than seduction. Guess what? You could get hit by a truck tomorrow. The hell you mean she's gonna leave you? Only thing you have control over in this life is your own behaviors and feelings.
/r/seduction09/03/19 10:45 AM
2

Nice video. I'd only say that when in an actual relationship comfort takes over intent, even though intent still needs to be there. So I guess I'm trying to say these concepts still apply to some degree, but not as much. Like I'm not sure about "screening" once you've actually committed to the relationship to begin with. Sounds like the kind of thing that may backfire if you actually wanted to be with her. So I would not use screening as a technique/tool unless I REALLY meant it.
/r/seduction20/02/19 03:34 AM
-1

I think you haven't looked at anything pua in the last decade...it's been centered around inner game. Yes. He does need to keep gaming. That doesn't mean being an asshole, but that means, for instance, saying "I love you" after a high point and not just because she said it first. That also means joking (nicely) when she says it at thr end of a phone call....or winking and smiling when she says it in person at a low/average point.
/r/seduction29/12/18 05:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter