TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skazzaks Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by skazzaks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It is obvious he hated men. It is also obvious from the post that he hated them in different ways.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:26 PM
0

You are telling me that, to you, it is more likely that: 1) He was born with a mental illness issue which caused him to become misogynistic. than 2) He was misogynistic and killed at least in part due to these views. and that further, you are so confident that it is it the first (with no presentable evidence) that you think considering the second is silly? I must say, I am happy to see people accepting that he is in fact misogynistic overall. At the beginning of this discussion that was also a d…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:01 PM
2

I do? Mental illnesses can be caused by social factors and need not be due to a chemical imbalance. His killing was directly related to his feelings about women. If he didn't feel that way about women, he wouldn't have killed. He states that clearly in his paper. Please answer this question: is that correlation worth exploring to try to prevent these things in the future?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:57 PM
0

Do you believe the contra is also true? That you can skew a something to your cause even though it clearly has something to do with it? Or is it just "the other side" that does that? The dude was a clear misogynist and that is worth exploring. There are other issues as well worth exploring. But ruling this one out prima facie seems ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:15 PM
0

They can be correlated with each other, can't they? The guy says in his manifesto that he had a very happy childhood. Do you believe it is highly likely that he just had a latent "mental illness" gene that popped up later in life and not at all possible that societal issues affect people and thus should be explored?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:11 PM
1

The fact that you think that my position must be biased because it isn't yours as well as the fact that you think there is a correct forum to express this view both illustrate problems that prevent us as a society from making progress on issues, regardless of what answer we come up with. I have presented reasons for what I think and have cited the text the person left. Is your "Dude. (and so on)" supposed to be weighed equally against that?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:09 PM
3

It is clear from the first sentence of his manifesto that he hated women more. Why do you want the opposite to be true? Admitting that he hated women and that there could be things about that that we could explore given that seems to be such a hard thing for many people to accept and I just don't understand it.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:37 PM
0

There is no basis for your strawman claim. No feminist holds that these people are responsible for their own deaths. If that is your view of what feminism means, please open your eyes.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:34 PM
4

I didn't mean to cherry pick. He did indeed say that too. I don't think what your quote is representative of the text, however, whereas mine is. We can even look at the first sentence: Humanity... All of my suffering in this world has been at the hands of humanity, particularly women.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:32 PM
0

Let me get this straight: you believe the only view he held about women are that "women are wonderful"?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:31 PM
4

I think this is the problem with the whole issue. That is says nothing about "normal men". Of course he was mentally ill, but that does not mean automatically that his motives were not a result of culture or societal views. To not take his manifesto into a psychological calculation would be a big mistake. We can use that information and move forward to try to prevent things like this from happening in the future and through the lens of masogyny seems like a reasonable one, given the things that …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:11 PM
44

Obviously people care that men died. People care that there were deaths in general, regardless of sex/gender. The next step is to figure out what is going on. Normally we aren't so "lucky" as to get a manifesto from these killers, giving us insight into their mindsets and what led them to do what they did. In this case we got 140 pages that allow us that very thing, and with statements like the following, it is not hard to see how we could start a conversation about misogyny: Women are like a pl…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:24 PM
0

Perhaps it is the feminists and their supporters who block funding and education going to boys’ and men’s issues that are to blame. I don't see how anyone could seriously read this. Is this a real theory?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter