TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skee_ Archive

View 8 posts and 252 comments by skee_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Jesus, I didn't realize you were an obsessive. Bye.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:47 PM
1

I hate to use that old cliche but -- get a life. Browsing other people's comments on Reddit is right up there with voting for a Clin-ton. Seek help kid.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:45 PM
1

I literally just scrolled through 50 comments you made Lol. How sad are you? You're like the dork in the sub, sub, sub basement. Word to the wise: Hillary's not all that great. Go outside, smell the fresh air, there is life beyond Clintons.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:41 PM
0

I think you're wrong. I've posted some articles here with anti-capitalist subtext and the mods have stickied it. Possibly your post was just lame.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:24 PM
1

Hmmmm....Hitler and Stalin...People who killed tons and tons of people. Where can I go!? Since you're a Stalin fan you must get that often. Jesus -- A Stalin fan. That takes serious balls, I have to admit. I assume you subscribe to one or another "Stalin didn't kill EVERYONE theory." Well, that's bullshit. Stalin may not have killed everyone but he killed lots of people. So fuck right off. If and when you start to develop some sense, re-read Kropotkin.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:18 PM
1

Sure. As soon as you tell me how anarchists deal with Hitler. Not by emulating him. That should be obvious at this point.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:02 PM
1

That's a recipe for atrocity and you know it. Yes, Stalin has been vilified beyond all sense; but he also ran a dictatorship. The seeds were planted with Lenin and Trotsky because they insisted that only state power was truly meaningful. Bullshit. There is no reason -- none whatsoever -- that "average" people shouldn't be allowed to take control of their own lives. Anything prolonging that is right wing reactionary bullshit -- and by advocating communism you are a part of that.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:35 PM
0

z
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:55 PM
1

"If the anarchists had run things what would have happened? And not just for mother Russia." Well, they didn't, and we inherited this lovely world. Do you realize that the "we're not ready yet" argument can go on indefinitely?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:20 PM
1

Stalin killed everyone in his nearest vicinity. He was a murderous prick. That's no way to run a fucking country. The anarchists offered a sensible path: worker-owned cooperatives, self-management, and efficiency. The attacks against the SU were terrible. But by centralizing power and killing his opponents Stalin just fed into their hands.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:41 PM
0

What history in power? Paris commune? it's easy to criticize when you've never had to actually do anything in reality. How would the anarchists have stopped the Nazis in WW2? What does that have to do with the way forward? if war is inevitable then war is inevitable. BTW, Hitler was financed by bankers in the US. In fact the entire fascist movement was funded by right wing asshole billionaires. You should know better than to parrot anti-Left propaganda. Stalin wasn't a "leftist." He was just ano…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:18 PM
3

That's where the "batshit crazy" part comes in....
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:52 PM
0

Isn't that anti-anarchist? Rights are things coming from governments after all. And Oxygen comes from the "sky". Do you want an oxygen mask? No? Then STFU. It's as silly as the libertarians. Except for the fact that libertarianism has been tried in countries like Chile -- resulting in mass torture. Anarchy is pretty benign by comparison -- witness 99 percent of our history. You'd quickly devolve into a dictatorship. Isn't that exactly what happened in the Soviet Union when you invested all power…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:32 PM
1

Men should stop paying for women Agreed. Stop offering them provisioning in any respect. Hmmmm, don't think I could go for that if it was e.g. my mom. beta bucks Oh God, not another Red Pill jerk-off. But I like discussing politics beyond "Eat the Rich" Technically it's called "Long Pig." Various attempts to justify war, violating the constitution (especially the 4th amendment), torture, etc. If you were born in Colonial America you would have been shot for those comments. Watch your step scumba…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:28 PM
0

People aren't ready for anarchy yet. You realize that sounds just like "People aren't ready for liberalism yet" a la Hillary Clinton? Be honest: Trotsky and Stalin killed the revolution in both Russia and Spain. I sympathize: you had attackers from all corners. But eg Russia would have been much stronger if it gave the workers actual rights and autonomy. Instead you just created another pathetic dictatorship.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:05 PM
2

Ted Kaczynksi (I'll probably get on some list just for mentioning his name) believed that technology would and will progress to such a state that a member (or members) of the ruling class would simply kill off the majority of the population for convenience. He had an IQ on par with Einstein so probably best not to dismiss his seemingly batshit crazy idea out of hand.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:02 PM
1

There is no such thing as equality between men and women. You're probably right there... The fact that everyone is roughly equally miserable in Afghanistan I was using an example of one of the worst places on earth, that has been plagued by war for decades (if not centuries) due to its strategic location on what Brzezinski called "The Grand Chessboard." In case you were wondering, that's why the US and NATO are currently occupying the country. My overall point was that minor tweeks to the law ca…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:56 PM
3

No, you can have a good form of capitalism (america 50s - 80s) that is made good because it has social policies. The only reason the 50's were "good" is because the US temporarily embraced semi-socialistic policies. In the 1910's and 20's coal minors were routinely shot just for trying to unionize. Full socialism is a foolish idea, as bad as free market capitalism." We lived under "full socialism" (actually anarchism) for 99% of our history. So it probably wasn't "foolish" but "common sense." We…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:52 PM
2

Trump is a huckster. A lot of miserable saps are buying his bullshit. So it goes.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:16 PM
1

Yeah fair enough. But surely you agree that solving "men's issues" will require quite a bit more than minor legal changes.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:15 PM
2

You're a Stalinist (I'm an anarchist). Your kind killed my kind as soon as you got into power in Russia, and Spain. I agree with you about capitalism though.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:13 PM
3

"Its not either or." Sure it is. You've been pushing socialism but haven't bothered to read its precepts? Socialism entails that workers (not the state) own and control the means of production. That is incompatible with fat cats sitting on their asses accruing wealth through no labor of their own. Don't be a pussy: advocate what you mean.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:11 PM
1

I partly agree. Especially when it comes to custody issues. But will legal tweekings solve homelessness, war and Afghan boys [or insert other latest imperial adventure] being raped? Probably not. So yeah, eventually a holistic approach will be required.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:09 PM
2

As for trump, he is playing identity politics. Indeed he is. But a lot of people are really, really stupid. Hence his popularity. I should probably qualify that statement. Some rich people know how to play the working class like a fucking violin, and that also explains Trump's popularity. I will say this though: Trump is (supposedly) opposed to corporate/banking "free trade" agreements, and escalating the new Cold War with Russia, so that's something. The problem is that he's clearly a psychopat…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:05 PM
3

And yet you socialist/Marxist/Statist/WTFever missionaries keep right at it. Are you stupid? Yes, yes you are. Let these hoes go hungry. That will adjust their expectations pretty quickly with respect to bacon. Probability of this happening...minus massive social collapse? Zero. You're an idiot. The socialist answer to this fundamental aspect of the state and violence is to increase the state's size and capacity for violence. Do you oppose NSA spying, the Patriot Act, perpetual war, torture, the…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:02 PM
1

A false rape accusation is the male equivalent of male on female rape -- and by "rape" I mean a man forcefully taking a woman as opposed to "stare-rape" or other feminist silliness. In fact a false accusation against a specific person is far, far worse than rape: False rape accusations are not treated as a serious crime, a strange stance for the "patriarchy." This despite the history of lynching -- a large percentage of black men lynched in the US were accused of sexually assaulting a white woma…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 04:08 PM
7

"Betrayed Women." Jesus Christ on a fucking pogo stick. I'm sorry, but this is beyond the pale. I don't normally link to MGTOW's but here's John The Other laying down the fucking law on this bullshit trial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PndQ78lJNpk Either women are equal with men or they have no sense of justice and are purely self-interested. You CAN'T HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT TOO.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:49 PM
0

This is a joke...right?...Right?.....RIGHT!?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:46 PM
6

Fair enough. But she also styled herself a real victim -- at the hands of significant males in my life -- so the point stands.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:11 PM
1

Reminds me of "stop resisting!"
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:53 PM
18

Here's the first reply to the top comment: The data is now out there, and despite the contrary view often pushed through here and the media, it is still overwhelmingly men who are the perpetrators of domestic violence. [false] NB: Not an "imaginary victim" - but a real victim - at the hands of significant males in my life. Please refer to: Bianca Hall's piece - elsewhere in Fairfax this evening. So she claims that male victims of DV are "imaginary victims" -- unlike her. How fucking disgusting i…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:46 PM
2

Haven't watched the video yet. Does she actually say that?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:41 PM
1

Kathleen Turner? Yep, she's a ball-buster alright.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:09 AM
1

Which one? Krissy from Three's Company?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:00 AM
19

Killing a baby is worse than rape. Far, far worse.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:04 PM
1

MAN UP...IN ORDER TO MAN DOWN.... Yes that should work. Or we could give men equal rights.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:17 AM
5

[female attorney] [sex offender for life -- link?] The people on this sub are supportive, I think you're taking advantage of them. Maybe I'm wrong. I doubt it.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 03:32 AM
2

Quite a few accounts of shenanigans and fraud coming out of Iowa if you go to r/all. Hillary is the elite's choice. She will do nothing positive for women or men. Her constituency is the billionaire class. Women voting for her just because she's a woman are useful idiots.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:02 PM
106

One down. ten thousand to go. I would have no problem with "gender studies" if it actually studied gender in a scientific way and didn't use propaganda, misandry and revisionist history instead.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:50 PM
1

There's a rather hilarious interview with Eazy E on the subject. The white female interviewer asks him about one of his lines, "So what about the bitch who got shot? Fuck her! You think I give a damn about a bitch I ain't a sucker!" Eazy insists that the word "bitch" does not refer to all women; it's more like the female equivalent of a douchebag. I think this is how the term is generally used. Women probably use the word "bitch" more than men.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:45 PM
3

Please talk to me in specifics Are you capable of reading? I just gave you dozens of examples. Pick one and run with it No one is "in power". I see. So you have as much power as the leadership of the National Organization of women? -- Which directly lobbies politicians and has a budget on par with large corporations?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:47 PM
2

can you give me a specific example of how feminism oppresses men? I just gave you a rather lengthy list. 99% of Christians are not like Westborrow Baptist Church That doesn't make any difference if the Westborrow Church are the ones in power.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:37 PM
1

I would be surprised if even half of what this guy writes about his overseas adventures is true. He appeared on a TV show in...Ukraine? Can't remember. But they brought on a woman whose picture he showed in his book and she claimed to have never met him. He's just a professional provocateur trying to stir up outrage and sell books and clicks. Protesters only increase his exposure and therefore cash inflow.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:34 PM
6

It's not just the number of voters or the feminist lobby. Men in power like catering to women and acting chivalrous. They generally don't like catering to men (their competition). To assume that they do ignores both basic biology and rudimental class analysis. Patriarchy theory is female projection of their own in group bias onto males. It's unscientific and irrational.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:25 PM
3

I'm a feminist and it makes me sad to think that you think we hate you! Your ideology is anti-male. There is simply no way around it. I just posted this on another thread: Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who spearheaded the movement in the US, wrote that women were "infinitely superior" to men. This viewpoint has been reflected by every single feminist theorist since that time. Some of the most important feminist thinkers, still taught in gender studies courses, advocated the culling of the male populat…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:18 PM
2

Yes fair enough.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:42 AM
20

Pretty good article, however he drops the ball here: We may live in a world where men as an aggregate have more economic and (arguably) political power, but that doesn’t mean that women have no power to hurt men or that male lives don’t matter. Men do not have institutional power. The exact opposite is true. Females are institutionally privileged in education, family courts, criminal courts, health care, and increasingly the workplace (quotas etc -- young women now out-earn young men). Privilege…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 12:23 AM
4

From Mean Streets, Raging Bull, The Deerhunter, Taxi Driver, Goodfellas, Stanley and Iris and Heat to Meet the Fockers and The Adventures of Rocky & Bullwinkle. Marriage in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:49 PM
2

Thank you for the civil reply. feminism should work to eliminate female privilege Indeed. If they did that, just once even, I might gain a modicum of respect for their movement. equal level with men's status I'm not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean that men have superior status? I think that is true of rich men; they have more status than rich women because they are generally perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have earned their wealth rather than marrying into it. But for the rest of the p…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:38 PM
1

I wouldn't say that. The fact that a woman was just let off for raping a baby boy shows that there is quite a bit of room for interpretation.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:03 PM
5

If a woman grabs you by the balls tight to coerce you into drinking the kool aid, it's not sexual touching. If I grabbed a woman's vagina would that be sexual touching?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:50 PM
0

Attacking a person's genitals is by nature sexual since they are sexual organs.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:49 PM
5

I believe feminism is the fight for equality for women It isn't and never has been. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who spearheaded the movement in the US, wrote that women were "infinitely superior" to men. This viewpoint has been reflected by every single feminist theorist since that time. Some of the most important feminist thinkers, still taught in gender studies courses, advocated the culling of the male population. Equality? First wave feminists reformed property laws so that married women had the…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:45 PM
10

Barbaric bitch. The fact that hundreds of baby boys die from the procedure every year should be enough to outlaw it.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:22 PM
1

Heh. If you say so.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:19 PM
11

This isn't men's rights this is just anti feminism Feminism is the primary obstacle to men achieving equal rights. Traditionalists are the secondary obstacle.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:13 PM
2

You're making the claim that the duluth model is the "law of the land" in most western nations - source it. I can find no immediate evidence that that's even remotely true. http://www.batteredmen.com/HamelDomAggressorViewpoint.pdf Lesbian couples have the highest rate of domestic violence. So? Lesbian couples alone discredit the Duluth model. Classing false accusations as violence? The state is the most violent institution in history. When, for example, a woman makes a false accusation of rape, …
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:51 PM
4

Are you joking? The act of attacking a child's genitals is "lewd or lascivious" by definition.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:21 PM
7

Child abuse (and in this case, torture) should be punished at least as severely as adult on adult abuse. Yet the opposite is true. I suspect this may be because the majority of child abusers are female.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:09 PM
6

If a man mutilated a little girl's vagina he would be charged with sexual assault. Hence the double standard commented upon.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:08 PM
5

Feminists are specifically to blame for allowing the mass abuse of children by women. They advocate the discredited Duluth model which claims domestic violence is caused by a patriarchal conspiracy. Despite the absurdity of their beliefs, they have effectively made Duluth the law of the land in all Western nations. Women can of course be arrested for abusing children, but efforts to combat the problem at its source are prevented by feminist models. Additionally, the most common form of child abu…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:06 PM
6

Mothers are more likely to kill their children according to most studies. One recent study claimed the opposite, but it was conducted by feminists and as usual they misrepresented the data: http://www.therebel.media/new_study_fathers_more_likely_to_kill_their_children
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:01 PM
26

Women happen to have a bit of a legal advantage now A bit of an advantage? Women can abuse their male partners and the man will be arrested. They can rape boys and be given child support by their rape victim. They can murder their husbands and get off on "abused wife syndrome" even if no evidence is produced that they were abused. They can kick men out of their own homes with false DV claims. Men are twice as likely to be arrested for a crime, twice as likely to be charged and receive 63% longer…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:54 PM
2

That isn't feminist logic, you're just fabricating stuff that sounds good. You need to research the topic. Feminists believe that domestic violence (and sexual violence) is caused by a patriarchal conspiracy. Look up the "Duluth model." It's the law of the land in most Western nations, despite being utterly ridiculous. Feminism perpetuates the mass abuse of children because women are their primary abusers. men are far more likely to commit acts of violence than women - a hypothesis which is clea…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:47 PM
3

No she doesn't. Men were the ones hunted in that mob. If you had brown skin, watch out!
/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:57 AM
2

The Guardian is right, for all the wrong reasons.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:09 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:59 AM
4

I gave you an upvote. Not all MRA's are right wing, it's actually a pretty even split politically speaking.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:41 AM
2

Isn't the far more serious crime the stabbing of the guy? pick-pocketing and pinching a woman's butt are hardly equivalent to attempted murder. Shouldn't there be vigils and protests on behalf of the guy who was stabbed? Edit: word
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:07 AM
6

Surveillance is in need of renovation, it was dark they say. Was that meant to be ironic? I hope so. This is what rape hysteria leads to: calls for more surveillance. Calls for more anti-male laws. Calls for reversing due process. Calls for lynching. Calls for gynocentrism. The video someone posted above to "prove" the rape epidemic showed dark-sinned guys lighting off fireworks and an interview with a bouncer who said that several frightened females ran to him for protection when some poor guy …
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:05 AM
3

You're welcome! :)
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:49 AM
48

The other thing about the "friendzone" is that women frame it only according to sex. If men just wanted sex they would use prostitutes. Most men in the "friendzone" have real feelings for the object of their affection. Claiming that these men are only interested in sex is cruel and degrading.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:06 PM
15

How can they say that being a stay at home mother is "in the hopes of attracting a mate"? Most feminists are rich white females. If I could afford it, I would prefer to have a wife who raised the kids rather than using daycare or a nanny. The problem is that they extrapolate their own privileged bubble to all of society. In truth, polls show that being a housewife is the "new American dream" for women. Turns out that being a wage slave wasn't all it was cracked up to be.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:59 PM
14

Young, single, idle males are dangerous. Work and wedlock can tame them Fuck right off. I'm not a wild animal or a slave who needs "taming" and I ain't going back to the plantation. Men need incentives, not more whipping. We've had enough of that.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:25 PM
2

No girl would even consider to report drunk sex as rape for example. I very much doubt that, unless German women are a different species. Hysteria wasn't desired, not by the police, not by the left media, not by politicians. It was and is clearly desired by right wing media.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:17 PM
18

You're not wrong. Everything related to men and masculinity is being progressively demonized. Feminists daily come up with a new derogatory term or portmanteau ("manspreading" etc.). The term "bro", short for brother, is now used to mock male activities. "Dude", "guy" and "dude-bro" have replaced "men." When men are the victims of some crime, they are referred to as people. Boys? Children. Meanwhile, the female versions remain. There's a really good episode of manwomanmyth about the denigrating …
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:12 PM
3

What are the implications of a society in which women earn more than men? We don’t really know, but it could be disruptive to family stability. It will be catastrophic. Hypergamy appears to be non-negotiable for the vast majority of women. They seek to partner with someone of equal or greater "value" -- meaning wealth/status/prospects. Most women would prefer to be alone rather than "date down." Their perceptions of value have nothing to do with a man's honor, integrity, work ethic, morality and…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:00 PM
2

I agree. It's incredibly narcissistic, as well as callous toward the real victim (the man she accuses). I remember seeing a post recently on TWOX titled "I think was roofied last night." It had like a thousand upvotes, with all sorts of sage advice given to the poor dear. She mentioned that she had a "few drinks." Yeah, I bet you did. There was some study where they actually looked at "date rape" cases and found that ZERO of the women who thought they had been drugged were correct in their asses…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:11 PM
3

I'd be interested in reading that article. I'm skeptical because I don't think you can compare Sweden to any other country in the world when it comes to batshit crazy feminism.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:00 PM
4

Bravo.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:56 PM
0

I honestly think false cases make up the majority. Not always due to malice but misunderstanding (eg she has sex while drunk and can't remember it the next day).
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:50 PM
3

Split between theft of phones, purses and sexual harasment. I'm sure lots of petty crime occurred, yes. Sounds like a problem with lack of jobs, not "rape culture."
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:45 PM
6

that's what you get for not taking responsibility for your own fertility and knocking up a girlfriend. Interesting that only the man has to be responsible in this arena. Perhaps if she didn't want to get pregnant she should have kept her legs shut, and perhaps the man should have been allowed to surrender paternity. Kidding of course. We all know that only men are expected to be responsible, whereas women can remain eternal children with the full blessing of society.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:43 PM
11

Hedge fund managers are parasites. If "success" means ripping people off who actually perform productive labour then, okay, technically you're right.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:40 PM
10

Only the rich can afford to marry. If you're worth $10 million and she takes half of it you're still doing pretty well. If you're broke, can't find a job and owe child support you end up in prison.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:38 PM
26

This is where all those "woman forced to marry her rapist" articles come from (referring to countries like India). What actually happens is that the woman gets pregnant then demands marriage, otherwise it becomes "rape" in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:37 PM
21

PMS has been successfully used as a murder defence. However don't you dare claim that women can become irrational during that time of the month -- that's sexist.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:34 PM
14

This was codified into law by the first wave feminists that everyone thinks are so wonderful. Originally, a man's earnings were his, however he was liable to support his family under threat of imprisonment ("abandonment"). Women could of course own property outside of marriage. Feminists demanded that women be allowed to own their own "special" property in the marriage while the man still had to support her financially and be responsible for her wellbeing. He was even responsible for her debts. …
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:30 PM
3

How do you feel about people who are simply "neutral"? You can't be neutral on a moving train, as the saying goes. People can claim they are neutral, but nobody, anywhere, actually is. As for problems in the MRM, I would like to see more leftists involved beyond just on internet forums. Most of the leaders are right wing on economic issues. Unfortunately this is difficult because people can literally get fired for expressing anti-feminist views, to say nothing of social capital. Feminists are ex…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:22 PM
1

This doesn't belong in this sub. Take it to r/politics.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:04 PM
12

Thank you. Really glad to see you taking a rational/non-hysterical stance on this issue. At the very least we should maintain a healthy skepticism over claims of "mass rape" considering the history. The historian Mike Davis has some interesting literature on rape panics and immigrants. For example in the US, pretty much every wave of new immigrants -- especially the dark skinned variety -- were accused of sexually assaulting white women. Filipinos, Italians, Japanese, you name it. Typically a mi…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:33 PM
1

Yes I agree with that. But let's not trade one form of rape hysteria with another.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:56 PM
14

The great irony is the earnings gap actually reveals female privilege. Women get to work less and in less dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:25 PM
0

Don't bother. This and every other post that questions rape culture hysterics involving non whites will be downvoted. It's a really good example of how politics can trump common sense and logical consistency. It happens on the left and we see it now happening on the right. These idiots don't seem to realize that laws passed in the wake of these hysterics will target all men, not just brown men.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:21 PM
1

I often get the impression that portraying men as rapists and monsters is only convenient when those men are white, if they're black, arabic, whatever, they're put in that 'victim' or 'oppressed group' box. I understand. I just don't see any compelling evidence of a "rape culture" in either case. Ultimately rape hysteria, whether propagated by the left or the right, is going to lead to yet more anti-male laws.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:16 PM
-1

That video shows people lighting fire works. Then an interview with a guy who claims someone was stabbed, and that a few females felt frightened. Woop de doo. Sounds like a pretty typical new years. I've seen much worse in Vancouver, and females themselves tend to be the biggest gropers when they're drunk.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:08 PM
0

Show me the video.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:24 PM
-4

According to whom? Sargon of Akkad? There have been several posts here called something like "checking Sargon's facts" showing that he has completely misrepresented the data. Sweden has a high "rape" rate because practically everything there is defined as rape.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:24 PM
-2

Fair enough. Just a rough estimate based on my experience in threads on the topic. Anyone who said, "ah, fellas, maybe we should wait for actual evidence and not succumb to rape hysteria about foreigners, which is a common theme in history" was downvoted.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:06 PM
1

That was great: Berlin police rejected a 13-year-old girl’s accusation that she was raped by swarthy foreigners from the “southern countries.” I was curious what a “southern country” is relative to Germany or Russia. It appears to be short hand for Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece (thus the reference to swarthiness). The Berlin police also warned internet white knights to settle the hell down, take off their capes, and stop rushing to save hoes. The girl claimed that three men of the swarthy p…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:04 PM
3

Good to know that the MRM supports due process rights and doesn't assume guilt in sexual assault cases.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:59 PM
6

He was to put be up to his waist in a three-foot wide hole dug in the ground, with one hand tied behind his back. The woman was to be armed with three rocks, each weighing between one and five pounds, and each one wrapped in cloth in form of a small sack. Still much fairer than today's family courts ;) Although the article claims that some women won these battles, I suspect that they were abandoned precisely because the man usually won despite all of the handicaps. They disappeared by 1200 and p…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:55 PM
1

Media silence over what? The only video foootage to have emerged from this supposed sexual assault epidemic (that is proven to have come from Europe) shows a couple of black guys setting off fireworks. I'm sure some sexual assaults occurred on New Year's eve (against both men and women) but I have yet to see any evidence of anything outside of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:43 PM
-12

Gee, what a surprise. Yet 70% of MRA's bought into the rape hysteria and "rape culture" claims since they coincided with their political beliefs about immigration. Right wing media sources have their own spin and sometimes just make shit up. I myself do not support current immigration policies, but innocent until proven guilty applies to everyone regardless of skin color or religion. Note that many of these countries are now considering increasing punishments for alleged sexual assaults. Guess w…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:36 PM
245

I'm unsure where such self entitlement comes from with some women. They call it "emotional labor." Theoretically that means supporting the husband emotionally. In reality it often seems to mean "getting emotional and nagging the husband."
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:31 PM
12

I remember when the Onion was politically incorrect. Now they're just pandering to feminists. How the mighty have fallen.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 02:34 PM
20

Wait a minute. When did we start calling them "woman's rights advocates"? They are feminists, and they are not pro-woman's rights, they are anti-men's rights. I support equal rights, but not female supremacy (including reversing due process), hence I am not a feminist. Has the term "feminist" become so toxic that they're going to start calling themselves WRA's?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 02:32 PM
3

It's projection, just like patriarchy theory itself. Women have in-group bias, men do not. Women talk constant shit about men in their groups, men do not reciprocate. Feminists thought to themselves, "how would I act if I was in power? Why I would oppress the shit of men! They must be doing the same thing!"
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:55 PM
4

"Bernie Bros"? Oh Stfu you swine.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:50 PM
8

Not a single country in the world gives a fuck about kids. If we did we would have shared parenting and massive campaigns against the single largest group of child abusers -- women. Instead we have "white feather" campaigns that amount to "teach men not to abuse women and children." Feminists use children as human shields for their hate campaign against men. It's disgusting.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:41 PM
7

Not only do feminists not care about female-on-male rape, the feminist Mary Koss excluded "forced to penetrate" from the very definition. They are also trying to abolish female prisons. People really need to read up on the history of feminism before embracing the movement. At minimum you should acknowledge their profound errors (assuming they are working in good faith, which is highly questionable) and work to correct them. The term is ultimately not what's important, it's the policies.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:37 PM
24

The number is very high. I think it's something like 65%. The single best way of stopping male-on-female rape would be to draw attention to and increase the penalties for female child molesters. Strangely enough, feminists -- though utterly obsessed with rape -- are not doing this. In fact despite the already egregious sentencing gap in women's favour they are trying to eliminate female prisons entirely. That is when they aren't trying to change the definition of rape to include normal heterosex…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:33 PM
1

I think you're missing an important point. Barbie dolls are for girls and maybe 1% of boys who like to play with barbie dolls. Girls don't want a fat short bald Ken in the same way that boys don't want fat blue-haired ball-breaking feminists in their video games. The "double standard" issue with men's rights is fine, and if this is a "meninist" satire then more power to you, but overall it's just silly. Girls have to worry about self-esteem. Boys have to worry about severe violations of their hu…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 12:14 AM
1

Better still.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:33 PM
1

Much better.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:19 PM
3

Something clever.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 08:49 PM
1

No need to apologize. Peace works as well :)
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:06 AM
3

piece...steel. But PEACE works in this context.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:00 AM
4

Honestly I was much more surprised by the solid MRA posts there. Unless the mods have deleted everything since I last viewed it. I found the counter-posts to the feminist bullshit quite inspiring. I mean, this is Toronto we're talking about.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 12:57 AM
1

Bullshit. Feminists are trying to eliminate female prisons, reverse due process rights for men, and continue to oppose shared parenting. Etc. It's not just about a few crazy broads teaching gender studies: these nuts have the ear of state power. The Council on Foreign Relations and JP Morgan count amongst the not-so-minor groups that push new feminist campaigns. Their popularity is at an all time low, but their power is at an all time high. Vigilance is required.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:39 PM
3

Great post. Double standards, time and time again.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:05 PM
44

Women are at least as violent as men. It's just that they prefer to use proxy violence. The state is the ultimate proxy, and the ultimate source of violence.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:25 PM
3

Meh, he's a good actor but I don't think he should be winning any awards. He gets chewed up and spat out by his costars in most of his films. I mean look at Gangs of New York -- Daniel Day Lewis basically had him for breakfast. Ironically, I think his best recent performance was the overlooked "Shutter Island."
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:21 PM
4

Even an omnipotent monarch is somehow oppressed if she's a woman. This is actually really interesting, because it cuts to the core of supposed female non-agency. Someone should write an essay about this. Even when fucking Queens are sending off boys to die in some war, we still search our tiny little minds for justification. Surely some man must have been responsible for her actions!?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:16 PM
8

Femalez ares teh victimz and menz teh evil. Call your local lawz enforcementz agency to fuck someone up! Big Sister Forever.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:05 PM
18

I saw that too. It's absolutely fascinating how both males and females will bend themselves into pretzels to excuse women of responsibility. Adding another layer of irony: feminism is supposed to be about equality and female empowerment. But they only want the good stuff. Truth be known, women are at least as awful as men.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:57 PM
6

a dance aimed at only woman asking people to it? Sounds great. I don't know if you are male or female, but it kinda sucks having to be the one to always initiate. It's not the same with sex; in my own experience my girlfriends have initiated even more than myself; but asking someone out is pretty tough. Every man here, unless he's Leonardo DiCaprio, will have suffered a rejection at some point. It's hard, but you pick yourself up and move on and try again. I honestly think that women could benef…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:54 PM
2

Wow I didn't know that. Will have to check her out.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:38 PM
-1

Who is "them" -- child molesters? I have no interest in currying their favor, I don't care how powerful they are.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:24 PM
1

I do now.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:04 PM
11

You need some paragraph breaks.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:03 PM
1

Think about it like a woman being bossy while acting as an actual boss, perhaps that will help.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:02 PM
1

It's like a lame attempt to emulate men without actually emulating men. Does that make sense? Men don't do it, you're right. Women are trying to be aggressive in general terms because they don't understand how masculinity actually works. This tactic *does work for Serena and a few other players, but overall it leads to a poor viewing experience. I LOVED watching the old female tennis matches, where it had more in common with chess than football.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:59 PM
1

I didn't like Seles either. In fact she started the whole screaming trend. You don't see Roger Federer screaming when he hits a ball. So-called "grunting" is essentially a way of distracting one's opponent. It's poor sportsmanship.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:50 PM
1

Well, Greer is at minimum a little unusual. Most women prefer a man who is a few years older than her. Germaine likes the young stuff. Nothing wrong with that if they are of age and it's legal, but yeah, she's a weird duck. At least one boy has condemned her predatory practices.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:46 PM
5

Hilariously stupid: Machismo affects white men differently than it affects black men; Oreeally? Lol. What does this dumb bitch know about "masculinity"? Nothing. Absolutely. Positively. Nothing. Edit: this was posted on "Best of Reddit"? LMAO
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:36 PM
1

Sounds plausible enough.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:29 PM
1

Uggh. She's pretty but she screams too much and just bashes the ball. Radwanska actually has game, like Martina H. Female tennis used to be about grace, now it's about poorly emulating men.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:27 PM
1

Who was or is your favorite player?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:22 PM
1

I would like to fight you.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:15 PM
1

Someone doesn't like female tennis. Well, we're not all sexists like you.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:14 PM
1

I hate Axe, but only a commie does'n have some love for Burger King. You know, flame-broiled and everything. US vs Them I certainty don't buy into that sort of paradigm. Which is why I oppose feminism. Your ads were pretty mild. A better sexist example would be: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBHewH8dlfc
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:53 PM
1

"Buy AXE because you won't get laid without it". Right. Because the male has to really, really try to get laid. Whereas the female...sits there. How is that demeaning to the female? She's the boss. This is not unique to humans; it's the rule in the mammalian animal kingdom. So suck it up. I'm talking about how embarrassing it is that men are assumed to be such horndogs Men are horndogs. If men weren't hordogs the species would have died out a long time ago. Why do you shame male sexuality? That'…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:36 PM
2

Hot chicks using their sexual power to achieve goods and services and freebies. What's the problem? The problem is that some young girls get insecure about their bodies. Okay, that's a fair complaint. But I'm not arguing against sexuality in media, I'm arguing against portraying men as fucking imbeciles.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:14 PM
2

Great post. Unfortunately you will just be downvoted. People don't want to hear information that conflicts with their ideology.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:00 PM
1

Like what?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:53 PM
1

They also fight against those who are opposing the fight against the fight. I just wanna fight someone. But who is left to fight?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:51 PM
0

There's a book called "American Psycho" if you would prefer the reverse. MRA's celebrate the book...actually no they don't. They rightly consider violence against women appalling.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:30 PM
1

You're welcome! Always glad to help.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:27 PM
0

So you're saying that unless women meet your quality standards for playing tennis, you think they ruin the game and you need to insult them. I don't need to insult them, but yes I do find it gratifying. You sir, are the worst kind. There is no need to promote what you like by demonizing what you don't. Since when did disliking something become "demonizing"? Never have I suggested that Serena Williams is a demon, although that's certainly possible. I make no apologies for the fact that I apprecia…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:03 PM
13

I think it's time for women to work all day and for men to stay at home with the kids and prepare delicious sumptuous meals. This should be state-mandated if necessary. Men have been working themselves to death for thousands of years. It's about time that females did their fair share. We need to recruit females into all of the most dangerous occupations. Edit: also, only women should be subjected to conscription. Females should fight our wars and we men should stay at home and chill. Why didn't …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:52 PM
4

Trolls, trolls everywhere, and not a drop to drink.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:50 PM
-1

So you have no respect for your neighbours? I GUARANTEE a bitch like Sharapova screams in bed. You would live your entire life saying, "sweeheart, please STFU" while boning her. Like that scene in Porky's with Kim what's her face.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:39 PM
-1

I take offence at your "knuckle-dragging buffoon" comment. It is problematic because it stereotypes silver-back gorillas. It's also highly ableist. As for male-female tennis or male-female anything, of course the males are superior. That's biology, and no amount of whining will make it any different. Luckily, women have their own set of advantages and skills. Why poach the male ones? It doesn't really work anyway. And yes, I am an unrepentant admirer of traditional female grace as exemplified by…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:36 PM
1

Lacrosse is awesome. Ironically it's Canada's national sport, rather than hockey. Traditional lacrosse by first nations was fucking brutal though. People literally died during the "game."
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:29 PM
3

A few minor criticisms: Karen is an angel, which she absurdly denies in this video Engels developed his theories about sex far before his publication of the Communist Manifesto the Communist Manifesto didn't reach America until several years after first wave feminists were mostly not socialists but Christian Conservatives who regarded females as morally superior many of the original socialists and anarchists opposed feminism George Orwell, a socialist, was a self-described anti-feminist After se…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:16 PM
0

...
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:10 PM
0

I'm not really surprised by what the women's motivations to make this kind of music are here. You know, I would honestly have no problem with this whatsoever if feminists were actually a dissident movement. The problem is that they already have profound institutional power; have argued for censoring the internet; and have argued for androcide. So it doesn't work the same way of Gil Scott Heron talking about "whitey on the moon." These are people with real power. And despite their delusions they …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:54 PM
3

By the same logic of using russia during WW2 as somekind of data point of male/female generalisation, men are vile rapists because the rapes that occured in germany by soviet soldiers were common place I have no problem with that analogy. Better to be raped (and men and boys are often raped during war) than have your legs blown off or be tortured to death. But it's already clear that males make up the vast majority of deaths in war. Do you dispute that? Describing Soviet war deaths is not a matt…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:24 PM
0

Have you seen John Waters' "Serial Mom"? It's a hilariously offensive satire about a female serial killer played by Kathleen Turner. L7 makes a cameo under the band name "camel lips." Krissy from Three's Company also makes an appearance.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:09 PM
3

There is an article in the corporate media every second day about the danger posed by men's rights activists. Similar to articles in the early 20th century about the dangers posed by unions, or the articles in the mid 20th century about the dangers posed by civil rights activists. Granted these articles usually refer to some comment on the Return of Kings website rather than actual men's rights activists, but I think it shows a real fear that the movement is gaining steam. It is. There is no que…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:42 AM
1

sacrifice or distraction of some sort Sacrifice is an excellent way of describing it. Whereas the Soviet leadership would never have dreamed of intentionally allowing a million women to be slaughtered, they were okay with doing so for men. That is female privilege, in essence. Certainly women can "aid the war effort" in numerous ways, though I'm not sure that's a good thing. A former Mossad head argued that female intelligence agents are more effective on the ground due to the sympathy their gen…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:36 AM
4

Do feminists actually buy in to their own shit? It's a really interesting question that I haven't been been able to figure out. Are they just really, really dumb or are they Machiavellian James Bond villains?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:19 AM
9

Shouldn't Asian and Jewish males be charged even more?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:08 AM
0

It's not a typo. The Navratilova martini is an excellent drink. And who doesn't love butts?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:06 AM
4

Women can be funny. Tina Fey and Julia Louise Dreyfuss have made me laugh via their comedic prowess. But it's a relatively rare thing. I doubt we'll ever have a female George Carlin or Bill Hicks. Christopher Hitchens wrote a famous article about this, titled "Why Women Aren't Funny": http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/04/funnygirls200804 Tina Fey was asked about the article, and she responded, surprisingly, with a complete lack of humour: http://www.beamsandstruts.com/bits-a-pieces/item/768-ti…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:55 AM
2

It's not so much a matter of training as biology. Ie sexual dimorphism. Native Americans did not have any significant number of female warriors and neither has any other culture in history, Amazonian myths notwithstanding. Males make up not only the vast majority of warriors throughout history but the vast majority of victims. As far back as Alexander the Great we can see androcide in practice (in Tyre he crucified all the "military age" males); and even today, the US labels any "military age" m…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:39 AM
1

But indeed, even in Patriarchal times, men were the disposable gender. Even patriarchal leaders started wars where 80% -- 90% of casualties were men. ...as well as "matriarchal" leaders like Queen Elizabeth ;)
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:32 AM
2

That's really interesting. Was not aware of that.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:31 AM
6

I still don't think men really fight. That's true. I mean, if men really decided to "fight" against the female gender it would be over in about ten minutes. It's all very frustrating, because we are instinctually disinclined to stand up for our own rights. We would rather fight on behalf of women and children. But I do think that feminism has become so absurd, and males so disadvantaged, that we have no choice but to act. Anti-feminism has greatly increased, with only 8% of British people identi…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:19 AM
7

Quite right. The Declaration of Sentiments (interesting that even the title of their manifesto refers to feelz rather than facts) was essentially a declaration of war by women against their protectors and providers. Utterly revolting if you stop and think about it. They knew in advance that men would not fight them, and they went ahead and declared war anyway, using the male protective instinct as a weapon. It is worth stressing that the majority of women, then and now, did not agree with their …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:40 AM
38

A joke stealing child molester who falsely accused a man of rape and a rapist -- modern feminist icons.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:29 AM
1

This is one of the most appalling things I've ever read. Feminists truly have no shame.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:54 AM
10

they actually fought the guys who started work in the 20s, 30s and 40s, and didn't want to see women in the workplace. This is a common misconception. The reality is that women themselves were often opposed to female workers because it created competition with their husbands, and because, well, they didn't want to work. Nevertheless: Between 1880 and 1900 the number of employed women rose from 2.6 to 8.6 million. This occurred not because of "female liberation" but because industrialization allo…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:31 AM
-4

lol but Sharapova is actually kinda hawt. She's no Genie Bouchard but she's alright. Still, a screamer.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:30 AM
8

Buttheart much?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:48 AM
1

...
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:13 AM
-6

Female tennis has always attracted male fans, not just horndogs, but men who appreciate the feminine grace of eg a Martina Martini Hingis. Alas, that is gone now, and we have grunting pseudo-males like Sharapova and Serena. Yuck.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:06 AM
2

History is full of those sorts of intrigues. For example did you know that Allen Dulles -- CIA Director for decades -- did business with the Nazis and was a Nazi sympathizer? Go figure!
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:01 AM
4

Yes I've seen it. Utterly disgusting. It's like saying, "well, a black man caused the shooting," so fuck it; since he was killed by another black male, his case is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:58 AM
49

How dare you insult Martini Navratilova and Serena Williams. But yeah my female feminist friend prefers male tennis, go figure.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:55 AM
12

Actually "white men are privileged" is a very common theme. Feminists rarely add a qualifier.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:43 AM
18

Indeed. I mean just look at the previous gargantuan slaughter, WWI. Feminists are obsessed with the idea that the patriarchy denied women the right to vote. In fact, as Christina Hoff Sommers has demonstrated via solid research, the majority of opposition to female suffrage came from women themselves. In NY alone, 25,000 women joined an anti-suffrage group, arguing that "Holy Scripture inculcates for women a sphere higher than and apart from that of public life." Does that sound like an oppresse…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:16 PM
6

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3259491/Hillary-Clinton-beats-husband-Bill-terrorizes-staff-new-book-claims.html Of course should be taken with more than a grain of salt as nothing has been proven, and Republicans have a vested interest in demonizing her, however the allegations come from quite a lot of different people and they certainly seem consistent with her character. Apparently she also abused members of the Secret Service. She's hated for good reason. "She also claimed that Clint…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:42 PM
8

It is nothing short of appalling that feminists continue to pretend as though this guy deserves to be locked up for disagreeing with feminists online and making a few salty comments ("fat asses" was basically the worst of it; they dished out far more than they received, falsely accusing him of being a pedophile; and they even created a fake GAE twitter account which spouted homophobic nonsense). This case -- and continued feminist attempts to justify it -- should send a chill down the spine of e…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:32 PM
1

It's not so much anger as grim bemusement.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:10 PM
3

What would the male equivalent be, a band named "Rapist"? Still all tickety boo? A more accurate comparison would be "The Ted Bundy Fanclub" or some such, performed without irony. I seem to recall Nick Cave making some songs about serial killers but it's not as though he celebrated their activities. To be fair, some male groups, such as N.W.A., have incredibly misogynistic lyrics, and have been praised despite this. However since they're not straight white males feminists don't seem to care much…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:04 PM
4

At the same time about 100 of their songs are about slaughtering and mutilating their male enemies and nobody cared ... And there you have it.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:42 PM
8

It was certainly superior to our present system, and arguably much more gender egalitarian since both men and women suffered disadvantages, whereas currently women have all the rights and none of the responsibilities. The no-fault-divorce-single-mother-I-don't need-no-man experiment has been an unmitigated catastrophe. Either we go back to patriarchy or men achieve equal rights. There is no other solution except collapse and extinction.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:38 PM
5

This is true, but it reflects terribly on womankind as a whole that these adverts are effective. Women should oppose them as well. Only an insecure, childish, petty narcissist enjoys seeing an entire class of people constantly degraded.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:29 PM
5

It's not just liberals promoting harmful messages. Conservatives are constantly droning on about "deadbeat dads" for example even though the majority of divorces are initiated by women and the father often gets screwed in family court. Conservatives should be supporting the MRM but they cling to outdated "man up" philosophies and general gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:25 PM
1

I don't listen to death metal. Is misogyny actually common? My understanding from the comments is that the "gore" stuff is usually targeted at both men and women, and is therefore rather egalitarian. But I'm no expert. I have a problem with neither. They are of course free to act like cunts and make whatever shit music they want. I just find it interesting to see feminists like the interviewer wallowing around in sick revenge fantasies and misandry on the one hand, then claiming in the next brea…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:16 PM
1

Are you a female? 'Cause it seems to me that an alarmingly high number of females "can't help but smile" when they hear of a woman castrating a man. Exhibit A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDjUjhexTQk Penis envy much? One thing is clear: men have significantly more empathy for women than vice versa, and this presents a real problem in terms of female leaders and gender equality. I can't imagine men laughing about a woman having her vagina carved out. I agree that in the case of this band (unl…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 09:02 PM
2

L7 has some pretty good jams.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:31 PM
1

No it doesn't. Globally, the people who are executed for homosexuality are overwhelmingly male. Gays are also much more likely to suffer violent hate crime, and there are still laws on the books in many countries against sodomy with no corresponding laws against lesbian sex. Having said that, gay rights already receive a lot of attention in the West; it is heterosexual males who are suffering the worst abuses at the moment.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:25 PM
17

It's pretty remarkable that both the interviewer and the subject don't seem to realize that equating feminism with hatred of men and indeed taking pleasure at the thought of mutilating male genitals is not exactly good PR for their movement. Maybe they just don't care at this point. They hate men and boys and are proud of it. As for "revenge," what exactly are they taking revenge for? The horrible history of women being sheltered and privileged while men worked all day in dangerous conditions to…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 07:55 PM
12

Weird article. Basically an attempt at psychoanalysis. Camille does not support her claim that Hillary Clinton's brand of feminism is anti-male. She could have used Hillary's frequent quotes about women being superior to men, or her "women are the primary victims of war" bit, or her policy positions. Instead she tries to paint Hillary as a victim despite many, many accounts of her own domestic violence against Bill.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:49 PM
0

Females determine how masculinity is expressed. If they rewarded emoting then men would emote. It's as simple as that. The idea that you can analyze male behaviour in isolation and without any reference to female power and sexual selection is absurd. Also, men do open up to relatives and close male friends. They just don't dwell on their feelings because they need to keep the world running and these women safe and privileged.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:25 PM
47

Sorry, but you can't spend a hundred years "dismantling the patriarchy" then demand its return when the going gets tough. Well, you can, but it's bad form, ladies. Men do not owe women protection. They're strong and independent, they'll be fine.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:37 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:26 PM
2

Yes that's a good point. Personally I prefer the scandavian model of prevention, reasonable jail time and rehabilitation rather than punishment. But they may go a little too far in the other direction.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:22 PM
12

urge men to be more emotional -----> take sip from "male tears" mug urge men to talk about their problems ------> shut down men's groups where men talk about their problems. claim to be for equal rights --------> oppose men's rights claim to be oppressed ------> wield institutional power
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:43 PM
33

As a man I find it irritating but nothing to get too upset about. Boys are a different matter. Especially those with single mothers. It can't be healthy to raise boys in this sort of environment.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:28 PM
4

There are quite a few gays involved in the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:12 PM
3

The people on this sub are well aware of what is going on in Canadian universities. Feminists have been trying to shut down men's groups and even lectures delivered by non-feminists about men and boys. Evidently you are ignorant, but there is absolutely zero controversy here.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:08 PM
3

You could have stated that you think feminism infantilizes women and creates a toxic relationship between the sexes. In other words: feminism harms women too.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:12 PM
11

That's not possible. Powerful feminist groups specifically oppose equal rights, eg NOW opposes shared parenting, and the white feather campaign embraces the discredited Duluth model which discriminates against male domestic violence victims and ignores woman-on-child violence. Feminism is certainly not about "equality." If it was they would be demanding longer prison sentences for women. Instead they are trying to abolish women's prisons entirely. Or they would be addressing the fact that school…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:51 AM
70

Ironically this demonstrates that feminist theory is hogwash. If men actually held collective power they would be the ones shutting down feminist groups, not vice versa. Not that men are interested in reversing female rights. MRA's support women's rights; feminists do not support men's rights. It's clear as day. Feminism is the establishment. They are the reactionaries. I would like to see the specific names of the people responsible for this decision. They should be publicly shamed for their ap…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:14 AM
5

After the first few years the dad is far more important than the mom. Single fathers succeed where women fail.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:11 PM
0

Cats are evil, no doubt about it. But nature designed them that way, it's not their "fault." When it comes to house cats, and I'm assuming all cats, they are both affectionate and diabolically evil. However they are also real characters, and constantly do hilarious shit. They are lovable little devils. I also love dogs, especially wolves and Huskies. I love the piercing blue eyes, the ability to withstand extreme cold, and the general exuberance for life. What's not to love? The Japanese made a …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:32 AM
0

http://www.twainquotes.com/Cats.html
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:39 AM
6

Marriage has become a luxury. Let us imagine a very rich man, worth $100 million. If he suffers divorce rape, he will lose half. Well, that's still $50 million, nothing to cry about. Now let us imagine a poor man, worth $10,000 dollars. Losing half of his income means choosing between rent and food. He may have to move back in with his parents, assuming they are still alive. The ruling class favours feminism because it disempowers working class men. But they are playing with fire.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:10 AM
1

A woman in the comments wrote: Daughters are pretty great. But sons are even better, from my experience, and I have both. The mother/son bond is a secret romance that goes on and on. My daughters are actually a pain in my ass, now that they're grown, while my son is still the love of my life. I usually keep this a secret. I'm not too articulate this morning, sorry... I found that quite touching. There was a time when the mother-son relationship was the strongest of all relationships, even more t…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:02 AM
7

Comments are universally negative. The tide is turning my friends.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:43 AM
-9

I'm gonna have to agree. Anyone who throws cats against walls deserves a paddlin stabbin. Without our feline friends keeping the rodent population in check we would still be hunter-gatherers. Perhaps that would have been for the best (according to my anarcho-primitivist friends) but this is the path we chose.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:37 AM
4

This is brilliant. The title "privilege grant" serves as a provocation, but when you click on the site you realize that non-rich white males really have become a disadvantaged group. Indeed in the UK poor white boys are the most disadvantaged group. What "intersectional feminists" seem to have forgotten is that society is not static. Their ideas do not even make sense from their own favoured theorists such as Foucault. Quoting another poster: The irony is that Foucault has become the eternal fav…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:24 AM
0

Why the Cosby obsession? This is dumb. I can think of 100 cases (*referencing my computer) that are more important. Like, people who are actually at risk of going to jail.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:06 PM
10

This is brilliant. The title "privilege grant" serves as a provocation, but when you click on the site you realize that non-rich white males really have become a disadvantaged group. Indeed in the UK poor white boys are the most disadvantaged group. What "intersectional feminists" seem to have forgotten is that society is not static. Their ideas do not even make sense from their own favoured theorists such as Foucault. Quoting another poster: The irony is that Foucault has become the eternal fav…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:59 AM
4

middle-class white guys Interesting that they added "middle class" for once. Evidently they are starting to recognize the absurdity of accusing all white males (including the poor) of being "privileged." Still, aren't middle class white males in Canada at the highest risk for suicide, outside of indigenous males? Seems really nasty and sadistic to keep trashing said demographic in light of the suicide stats alone. And the snark thing -- yeah. Snark is what feminists use in place of logic. It's t…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:34 AM
55

I was reading an article about the population crisis in Japan. It had various officials brainstorming ways of solving the problem, including the absurd idea of a tax increase for "handsome" males. It never seems to occur to these idiots that men are rational creatures and require incentives, not ever increasing levels of shame and punishment. How about supporting Men's Rights and reducing female privilege? The feminist movement -- combined with traditional gynocentrism -- has created so many mas…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 05:25 AM
14

Don't forget his social status and the size of his bank account.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 07:32 PM
4

The Council on Foreign Relations -- where the American super rich go to talk shop -- is strongly feminist. http://www.cfr.org/women/help-feminism/p29931 The hilarious thing is that feminists actually think they are "fighting the man." When your campaigns are being supported by the richest people in the world it is a safe bet that you are not on the side of the oppressed. Aside from the rich woman factor you mention, feminists are evidently useful idiots for some other purpose. If I had to guess …
/r/MensRights23/01/16 07:19 PM
2

Far be it from me to give advice to Straughan, but I would be interested in hearing her take on some of the scholarly MRM books out there, like The Second Sexism and The Privileged Sex.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:19 PM
-3

Yep. The hypocrisy is astounding.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:14 PM
1

Quite right.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:49 PM
3

You know what else raises the GDP? Car accidents and house fires.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:43 AM
1

Link isn't working for me.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:59 AM
4

The reality is that the left is being parasitized by feminism. It's been happening since at least the 70's. Bourgeois women wanted to earn social status via "oppression." The problem is that they weren't actually oppressed, and they quickly received tons of funding by elite foundations. If you look at the late 19th/early 20th centuries, many socialists and anarchists (including women like Mother Jones and Elizabeth Gurly Flynn) were either anti-feminist or non-feminist. Today, leftist class anal…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:36 AM
1

Well, it's not a popular opinion but I loved "Wolf Creek" Also, Canadians generally love Ausies and vice versa, since we're both sometimes-victims of the Crown and America. Edit: one word. Added "America".
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:55 AM
1

Well in that case he seems like a fine man. A very, very uncomfortable little bit of history is that CIA and MI6 worked with Australian intelligence to overthrow the Gough Whitlam government (CIA is technically prohibited from engaging in "operations" against American citizens, but also the other Anglo citizens in countries like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Britain. Collectively, the so-called "five-eyes."
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:36 AM
1

Despite the length of your headline I didn't get any real info. Not everyone here is Australian.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:21 AM
3

Don't marry. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:19 AM
1

There was enormous opposition to first wave feminism amongst women. That's a little known fact that Christina Hoff Sommers has discussed. She notes that 20,000 women joined an anti-suffrage group in NY during the late 19th century. Not because they felt women were incapable of voting rationality. But because they were wary of merging the traditionally male and female spheres -- they already had lots of power, but what about conscription? Similarly, feminism has always been rejected by most women…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:35 AM
4

No I didn't notice that. But thanks for adding insult to injury ;) Karen Straughan has spoken of husband-killers in the early 20th Century being repeatedly let off by all-male juries. Would female juries help? Evidently not. Studies show that female judges are even more likely to let off female perps than men. Both men and women are gynocentric. Hence the problem. Before the development of the state, men could balance this shit out quite easily, and no I'm not talking about domestic violence but…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:26 AM
1

Aka Anita Sarkessian is a prude who hates male sexuality. Or pretends to hate male sexuality while raking in cash from suckers. Men like butts. Straight men like female butts and gay men like male butts. Deal with it biatch.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:40 AM
5

Discouraging girls from STEM? That's fucking Beta dude. Whatever happened to good ol' fashioned gang rape and wife-beating? And none of that pansy ass "pimp slap" nonsense -- I'm talking full fist. Time was a man could cold-cock a bitch and the townsfolk would cheer! Actually... It has often been claimed that wife-beating in nineteenth-century America was legal... Actually, though, several states passed statutes legally prohibiting wife-beating; and at least one statute even predates the America…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:33 AM
7

Huh? Doesn't that defeat the entire purpose of men's sheds?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:00 AM
3

Increasingly less so. A new study in Britain found that only 8% of people identified as feminist but a strong majority supported gender equality.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:23 AM
8

There have been some not-so-scientific studies of feminist utopias on "survival" shows. Invariably the women accomplish nothing, bicker, backstab, bicker some more, wake up crying in the rain, then the producers take pity on them and send a man to help. The men, meanwhile, show remarkable cooperation, quickly create shelter, and split up into teams to catch food, collect firewood etc. When a woman is sent to the men's camp, competition greatly increases, and efficiency is reduced, but things tur…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:22 AM
1

Political partisanship is a big problem in my view, but I don't see much hope in eliminating it. For example posts that defend Muslims or promote left wing economic views are often downvoted, whereas posts bashing "liberals" and "lefties" are often heavily upvoted. It does happen the other way as well, but seemingly not as often.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:12 AM
12

Do feminists want to make women into androgynes? Arguably yes, albiet a kind of androgyny where only the best parts of both gender roles exist; female privileges, access to male privileges, and even exclusive-to-women-advantages in accessing male privileges (an entirely new thing), but without any of the drawbacks of either the male or female roles. While I agree with most of this excellent essay, I think it's worth pointing out that there are some drawbacks. Feminists do indeed desire to "have …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:26 AM
1

Alot of MRA's hate Muslims more than they support Men's Rights. It's the height of hypocrisy, since we rightly condemn feminists for blaming all "straight white males" for the actions of a minority (ie men in power).
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:34 AM
14

Mr Bonello said that a woman moved down the carriage to sit opposite him, then shouted: “I’m a woman, what’s your point?” She nodded towards her partner Jonathan Dalton, 27, who came across and punched Mr Bonello so hard in the face he was left needing 12 stitches, Blackfriars Crown Court heard. Female proxy violence at its best. Charging only the man seems a little bit like charging the enforcer and letting the mafia don off the hook.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:31 AM
3

Your title doesn't seem to gel with your comments. I'm guessing English is your second language. But you're right: feminists only have two choices. Either they can censor the internet or they can watch their movement go down in flames. Despite our gynocentric impulses, no ideology this harmful, stupid and contradictory can survive the light of day in the information age. There's a third choice, of course: they could admit they got a whooooole bunch of stuff wrong and welcome MRA's to the table. …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:23 AM
5

It's an interesting paradox. On the one hand, women are indeed weaker that at any time in history. They are enslaved by corporations where they used to have husbands who would literally work to death serving them. They seem to have the emotional development and maturity of small children. And since they are never held accountable they haven't developed the strength of character that goes with being an adult (unlike my grandmother's generation). On the other hand, they have the full power of the …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:16 AM
2

Love your posts. Are you Dr. Randomercam by any chance?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:42 AM
6

Most of the major subs are moderated by feminists. This is presumably one of the reasons that r/videos created a "political videos" sub-sub, so anti-feminist videos wouldn't make it to the front page. It's a travesty, since only a small minority of people identify as feminist.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:41 AM
2

Nobody owes you their attention Lol you sound just like Anita Sarkeesian. We get it: male virgins make you feel icky. Same as sluts make men feel icky (at least when it comes to long term relationships). That's what this comic is pointing out: the usual feminist double standard. Indeed I was just reading Against Men's Rights and the top-voted comment was something like, "for a bunch of guys who've never had sex they sure are concerned about cuckolding." This is an example of (unsupported) female…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:36 AM
2

Positives: A strong majority do not identify as feminist despite believing in gender equality. More people associate feminism with negative words like "overbearing" than positive words like "strength." More people think feminism is irrelevant than identify as feminist. The overall number of people who identify as feminist has declined. The study seems to have taken for granted the idea that it is women that suffer from inequality, rather than men.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:00 AM
5

Holy shit. This is the second case I've heard of of a female threatening a cab-driver with fake rape over a goddamn fare. I am increasingly of the opinion that false rape accusations are exceedingly common compared to the real thing. I'm also starting to think that "chaperones" and such were as much for the protection of the male as the female.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:34 AM
2

Check out Verhoeven's "Soldier of Orange" for another great anti-fascist movie.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:25 AM
4

Always make sure. A good parent/uncle might be a little irritated, but they'll go home and reflect on the matter and realize that they, too, would err on the side of caution. You need to check your fucking privilege. As a female you have no idea what it's like to be accused of being a pedophile just for being in the presence of children. No, the uncle would not "reflect on the matter" and somehow come to the conclusion that a paranoid nutcase with a dirty mind was in the right for stalking him. …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter