TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skepticalbob Archive

View 0 posts and 1,558 comments by skepticalbob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,558 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-10

Most protests are mostly men.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 08:35 PM
-8

1 - What you did is a classic example of whataboutism. Please don't change the topic away from the draft. Thank you. Giving an example of gender privilege in another country makes it about the gender privilege in that country. The mobilized women are also being made to be prostitutes too. Thanks. 2 - It's legal to beat your wife then. Glad we cleared that up. Since same-sex unions are not recognized in Russia, the only time that there's no punishment for beating your wife is if you're a female p…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 11:45 PM
7

Russia was 5 women for every 4 men after WWII.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 10:04 PM
-8

Men served to honor women, to try and get laid, plain and simple. Oh right. But women were asked work outside the home suddenly for some reason. You need to see the bigger picture, but I don't think you've ever had a woman destroy your life or your children's in anti-family court buddy. And there it is. You married poorly and seek to demonize all women because of your shitty choice. And that system in family court? Who do you think set that up? Oh right, men. Women are the problem and the evil i…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 08:28 PM
-4

You asked what it is called when women aren't allowed to serve, forcing the entire service to be comprised of men. Well that decision has almost always been made by male dominated political leadership, so that would be properly called "patriarchy". You learned something today. You didn't because you aren't really thinking this through, but you could.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:39 PM
-21

Patriarchy. Men in charge refuse women joining up.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:24 PM
5

Yes, total war isn’t fun. But the notion that feminism fades during total war isn’t accurate. Women have more leverage during these times, particularly with their labor, which increases in scarcity with men off fighting.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:05 PM
4

Labor rights, for one.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:04 PM
-12

Saying that women are lazy and entitled is textbook misogyny. I guess that’s welcome in this sub.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 07:03 PM
-18

It is legal to beat your wife in Russia. It's not like they have it easy over there.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:50 PM
20

When societies fully mobilize, women actually get more rights, not less. Look at the US in WWII.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:49 PM
-14

Not misogynistic at all.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:48 PM
1

This letter wasn't entered as evidence of anything. It was simply received, so...
/r/MensRights23/02/23 02:07 PM
-7

That’s a Hill headline, a garbage outlet catering to people with poor thinking skills. And you’re blaming a polling firm for it. You aren’t that bright.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:42 PM
-12

Sampling errors are a thing. Before embarrassing yourself using a poll to call five million people liars, but of course it can’t be men lying, learn about polling.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:19 PM
11

It wasn't an accusation in the hearings, primary or otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:13 PM
4

Who believed this anonymous letter with no return address?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:12 PM
1

A crazy woman sent an anonymous letter with no return address.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:11 PM
-27

Or there is a sampling error. Weird how you didn't consider that the men were lying.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:07 PM
-12

At least 5m women are lying. Pew didn't poll the entirety of the country. This survey was conducted among 6,034 U.S. adults from July 5-17, 2022. And vast majority weren't 18-29. But you immediately call 5 million women "liars". Okay. The data also shows that it flips with older people. All this shows is that women prefer older men and men prefer younger women. Groundbreaking.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:06 PM
0

Bullshit and buzzwords go together like carrots and peas.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 03:09 PM
1

Than I see this video of her and her bf talking. wut
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:31 PM
-69

Did a child write this?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:51 PM
-1

I doubt HR did nothing when he reported it. HRs are highly risk averse and have protocols they follow to a T when stuff like this happens. Sounds made up to me.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:49 PM
-21

Because it isn't about special treatment denied because she's female. The whole sub is frankly a dumb misogynist cesspool, but this is about defending yourself when someone is trying to shoot you.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/21 11:55 PM
-28

Not sure this fits the sub, unless this sub is about bad shit happens to a female, which is what it mostly is.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/21 10:15 PM
0

She's not a good interlocutor about the state of research on a subject. She's just biased and makes you feel smart because there's rEsEaRcH. You're projecting.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:54 AM
1

I have standards. One of them is to have it written down. YouTube is literally a place for uneducated morons go to hear people they think sound smart. They aren't, but they are on a video which is easier than rolling your sleeves up and reading.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:43 AM
-2

I've seen her before and she's an idiot. I'll pass.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:38 AM
0

It's not that they don't discuss it, it is that they actively pretend that sexism is not and never has been a problem for women. They minimize sexism that happens to women, even rape. That's just ahistorical nonsense and motivated by misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:38 AM
0

This isn't unusual in these kinds of cases at all. You are just ignorant. Look at Henry Hill or any of a whole slew of other very bad actors that got very small sentences, many for much worse crimes than this. It's literally the FBI playbook they've done for decades. But if you hate women, clearly it can only be because they are women. No need to even bother looking at other prosecutions.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:14 AM
0

I think there are very few men where this is the main problem in their lives. There's still plenty of fucked up shit that happens to women, this sub just doesn't want to deal with it. It's not really about that. It's almost always about the individual that is angry and takes it out on "those privileged women".
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:12 AM
0

I don't think these issues are the big problems in your life, bud.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:58 AM
-1

The point is so bizarre it seems like you need help. Get some.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:50 AM
-11

Again, she cooperated with the prosecution. This isn't unusual at all and when you completely ignore that to push some gender bias narrative it is transparent.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:50 AM
-5

Your sitting around spinning fantasies about rejecting women for being raped multiple times? I'm sorry you aren't happy with your life, but it isn't women's fault. Get some help.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:31 AM
-10

I'm aware of this story, having seen multiple documentaries and podcasts about it. She cooperated against Rainere. That's why she was treated more leniently. This is extremely common in trials with a head of an organization and their associates testifying against them.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:29 AM
-8

Eh, this sub loves to whine about women as if they are privileged, but it has mostly been conservative men "privileging them" to control them and limit what they can do.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:21 AM
-4

Bruh, you sound like these aren't your real problems at all.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:19 AM
-10

Eh, he was the mastermind behind her and other women doing the same thing. He was also guilty of different and more numerous crimes. But whatever grinds this sub's axe, I guess.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 12:18 AM
2

*diagrammed *out You were saying?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 06:24 PM
2

You are just throwing shit at a wall hoping it sticks. This is all completely incoherent.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:39 PM
0

Red flag laws are about firearms, not children, and Florida has one. It is also been found constitutional so far. And racists sure seem to be in the old South and other rural areas flying confederate flags and not Democratic strongholds. Thanks for showing us stupid though.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:14 PM
7

and got him back from her in the most dramatic way. Seems like the whole story hinges on what this means.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:10 PM
10

Where's the evidence this is different in blue states versus red states?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:08 PM
10

Where's the data that men are driving the changes in marriage decisions? She didn't present it. She just asserted it. It's basically one big just so story where she uses a story to explain a phenomena, but doesn't use data to show that her story explains the data. It's a classic fallacy.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:07 PM
2

They are great. They also aren't group bathrooms like whatever bullshit story this is.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 04:05 PM
1

I've never seen a gender neutral bathroom that had more than one place to do your business. Have you? Many have an area for handwashing that is mixed. This sounds like bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 04:04 PM
1

I agree! You can jerk off knowing that the chances of abuse directly connected to the porn is minimized.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/21 09:26 PM
1

But enough about onlyfans subscribers...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/21 05:28 PM
4

Whoosh!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/21 05:25 PM
-3

That totally happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 05:00 AM
-7

I mean...we know nothing about this case. What is claimed happened after they got to her room? Just because someone goes to bed willingly with someone doesn't mean they didn't pass out, withdraw consent, or refuse consent for something she was forced to do (anal, choking, whatever). Did she even accuse him to the police? The video only says that she didn't file a police report and her roommates triggered and investigation where ? happened and a judge subsequently dismissed it, reportedly after s…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 11:35 PM
1

It's probably policy to always review and accusation. Make sense to have a different standard than legal for employment, university, etc. Perps get off on technicalities when the truth is evidence all the time. No reason to have that force a university allow someone on their campus. Or a workplace.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 11:20 PM
1

Arguing against "feminism" when I'm not proposing that is lazy. I'm done here.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:52 PM
1

You are parroting him because black and white idiots think alike. Be on the side of human happiness and stop justifying your bigotry.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:24 PM
1

The choices aren’t male dominance of extremist feminism. You are just dumb if yikes think it is. Get off Jordan Peterson and wake up.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:08 PM
1

You can get rid of gender heirarchies and everyone wins. The notion that it must be based on gender and helping women hurts men is lazy zero sum thinking. Thanks btw for showing the intellectual laziness and bankruptcy common on this sub.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:47 PM
1

The notion that society must enforce certain kinds of hierarchies or they will happen in ways that make you sad is destructive. Telling women or men that you cannot have a certain job or position because you are the wrong gender isn't useful. There are great women supervisors and plenty of men that don't want supervisory position. The rest is just nonsense to have a "feminist" boogeyman to argue against. Most feminists are reasonable and simply want an end to discrimination against their gender,…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:39 PM
1

Fundamentally, we cannot escape the concept of hiearchy. Meaningless, but okay. Are you going to talk about lobsters soon? Feminism is a movement for female supremacy to put women at the top and men at the bottom for example. Is it? I don't think most self-identified feminists would think that. Somebody will be at the top and somebody will be at the bottom always. Also meaningless. The point is whether or not we want to sort society by insisting that one gender is usually at the top of the heap.…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:15 PM
1

Women still have the supremacy no matter how you slice it. Its still matriarchy. Yes, which is why men were forced to suppress and deny them rights all these millennia. We were just making it fair and anticipating dating websites. Sure, we didn't let them fight, but that was a small price for us to pay to keep them in their proper place without getting to choose their dates online.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:10 AM
1

I'm a man with an account on a dating site, dingus.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:08 AM
2

If people with masks are robbing, you might pass a law that people can’t be out in masks. Same thing.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:41 AM
1

You are making a claim about frequency and the statistics make it clear that you are wrong. It's really simple. "Men in India get false charges any time they don't marry the women they screw." "Uh, the base rape of rape charges makes them extremely rare." "Well, screw the statistics, amarite?"
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:44 PM
1

This is base rate fallacy. In 2016, there are 38,947 rape cases in India, a country of 1.36 billion in a country where the average age is 26. The US sees over 3x that with a pop one quarter the size and average age of 38. Age matters because younger people are far more likely to be the victims of rape. If the data says that rape cases are rare in India, which it does, then false rape cases are also rare.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:31 PM
1

"oppression" is just Cultural Marxism wut
/r/MensRights28/03/21 05:51 PM
1

Who said women determine hierarchy?
/r/MensRights28/03/21 05:51 PM
1

wut
/r/MensRights28/03/21 05:45 PM
20

2x more likely in a sample of n=2.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 05:30 PM
1

Cite your research.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 05:10 AM
0

It is not true that any random Indian woman can say this and the dude just goes to jail. That's bullshit. Actual rape goes largely unprosecuted in India. That's a fact. There's always a huge difference between the law and what gets actually prosecuted with rape in every country.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 03:46 AM
-7

That’s not true.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 07:28 PM
1

I care more about titles and prestige.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:33 PM
0

Look in the mirror kid. You are the one that went off on "neurotic women" because...checks notes...you were unmatched on a dating platform. Whew lad. Work on yourself.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:39 PM
-4

I'm not offended at all. But this is becoming increasingly clear that it isn't "neurotic woman" that are the problem with your lack of success, but you. You sound like a fucking incel. "I don't give a fuck how those fucking neurotic women feel if they reject me I can't have done anything that I should have a speck of introspection about." Grow up.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:22 PM
-2

I'd say this reaction probably has a lot to do with why you have some of these experiences, but you do you.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:15 PM
1

If you want to have less false accusations (and less rape), then we need to fully fund full investigations of rape accusations, regardless of who is involved. Right now, the vast majority of them get a cursory investigation and the nothing at all happens. If it's a false accusation, nothing happens because there is no evidence because there is no real investigation. If it is a real rape, nothing happens because there is no evidence because there is no real investigation. In that context, the num…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:58 PM
0

I see men being falsely accused and charged regardless of truth and evidence. I see men having their lives stripped from them because of baseless allegations. I’ve seen fathers say goodbye to their children because their wives brewed up a slightly convincing story, regardless of truth or evidence. It's worth noting the majority of people accused of any crime did in fact commit that crime. That's just a fact that is obvious from all available data. And the truth is that nearly every perpetrator o…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:50 PM
-7

As a woman, they are expected to be skinny, beautiful, spend money on their looks, etc. Yes, its difficult as a man on dating sites if you aren't really good looking, good job, etc. And yes, it's difficult on dating sites if you are a woman that is overweight or, god forbid, over 40. I have two reactions to your story. The first is that women get a lot of attention, particularly thinner, prettier women. They are going to use heuristics to sort. Many of them want (and say they want) for you to re…
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:46 PM
1

This sounds like something nearly no one has ever heard of, is touted by those outside the mainstream, and is being attacked as typical by people outside the mainstream.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:41 PM
-3

Well then grow up kid.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 01:30 PM
-8

Sorry no one wants to marry you.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 12:11 AM
6

I call all extremists extreme. Now what?
/r/MensRights03/01/21 05:06 AM
7

Because I criticized a men’s rights advocate. Even his take down of her was weird and extreme as hell, at least the few minutes I could stomach watching.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 01:49 AM
4

That guy is pretty horrible.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 11:06 PM
-7

I agree. I also think men be taught not to use alcohol to get around sober consent and lead to rapes? That's the source of a lot of sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:42 PM
-30

Not according to the article. Gay male relationships were the most violent.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 07:00 PM
1

You are so dumb you think that women's rights is somehow about Marxism. Whew lad. Learn to read and read up on both of them to see how dumb you actually are. Then you can stop being dumb.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 06:29 PM
1

Nice derp.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 04:47 PM
1

Like I said, these are obvious things people know. Not in this sub. Housing, taxes and many things became more expensive and more people had to work, so women went to work. This is especially true after WW2 when many men were killed off, many women had to start working to make up for the loss of men, so naturally more women started working. Female employment was at historic highs during WWII. It fell after WWII because they were laid off so men could work the jobs. Some went from welding to secr…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 03:25 AM
1

If women didn't ever want these positions, men would not have had to discriminate. Therefore your assertion that women were allowed to do as they wish but simply didn't want to is obviously false. And it is the underpinning of so much on this subreddit. An assertion of obvious nonsense underpins most arguments about discrimination here. If you didn't know, now you know.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 02:53 AM
1

I'm making it quite well. You are making claims about what women do and don't want to do in history because reasons and using that say that discrimination was therefore okay. Women couldn't own property, create a contract, be a lawyer, a doctor, or have her own separate money for much of US history. Single women could be denied a credit card and married women could be required to have it cosigned by a male until it was made illegal in 1974. Pretty sure this fits none of your historical explanati…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 02:42 AM
1

and still don’t want to do things like vote Women in the US vote at higher rates than men.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 02:35 AM
1

Again, if they simply didn't want them, they wouldn't have been forbidden in so many societies across the world from having them. You don't have to ban men from nursing jobs. They mostly don't want them because they are "female".
/r/MensRights29/12/20 02:32 AM
1

If they didn't want to do it, then you wouldn't have to prevent them from doing it. Even wealthy woman weren't allowed in across many cultures. These were prestige positions and those were for men.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 02:28 AM
1

I did. I don't believe most societies turn on a dime in 20 years. Domestic violence is usually pretty stable with slow decreases in good times/political change and rapid increases during tougher times. For example you can find multiple articles/data/studies from this last year of increases in domestic violence in Lebanon that is likely related to Covid. That's not surprising.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:57 PM
1

This doesn't seem rare.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:44 PM
1

If high-ranking positions are of such little import, why is it common historically that women are prevented from assuming those positions?
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:16 PM
1

He can beat her for it though.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:14 PM
1

About most things outside her own culture and legal frameworks that oppressed women. She relies on silly and simplistic arguments while actually enjoying an absence of these legal frameworks that historically oppressed women.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 06:04 PM
1

She’s ignorant af.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 04:50 PM
0

Oh this idiot again. She’s a grifter and y’all are falling for it.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 11:32 PM
1

That’s not what it said. It said men claim this when interviewed. That’s not quite the same thing. I know manchildren (and womanchildren) who feel stifled by simply being asked to be a good partner. “I can’t believe I’m suppose to clean up after myself and help with chores help I’m being oppressed!”
/r/MensRights23/12/20 10:09 PM
-1

It's worth mentioning that Patriarchy theory explicitly states that men are victims as well. It isn't just a one way street.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:17 AM
-19

Now do the pattern of bias in this sub. Or better yet, do yourself. Just checking for intellectual honesty.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 09:30 PM
-2

Now apply those exact standards to nearly every post on this sub.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 07:57 PM
1

I really don't care female victims of domestic violence. Why should I? Because you aren't a selfish asshole and care about abuse, regardless of gender? Who upvotes this trash?
/r/MensRights27/11/20 07:57 PM
-15

all of the comments would be telling her he is clearly cheating her with his patient That's speculation.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 07:54 PM
2

Aren't feminist whatever always saying It doesn't matter the category or descriptor, the answer is no. Need more information. You are making the same mistake as the feminist in this story.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 02:43 AM
0

Oh god. This is like derp bait for this stupid sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/08/20 04:22 AM
-2

She had stepped back when he grabbed and threw her. Maybe she was going to attack again, but he approached her to give her the toss.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 09:19 PM
-2

I'm not talking about legally. I'm just saying they might have know he was dangerous and would attack her, just like he did.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 07:59 PM
-6

Or the person that said it knew he outweighed her by a couple hundred pounds and was a psychopath that would assault her.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 07:49 PM
-7

Without context, I'm not sure why. He looks scummy as fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 06:22 PM
2

This is how abuse works.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:22 AM
0

Or...stay with me here...you are both assholes and shouldn’t be celebrated.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/19 05:38 PM
-8

Who watches this shit? It's so dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/19 11:23 PM
0

Nah, you've already dismissed them as "feminist" and shown your cards. I've got a lit review for some research I need to do. I'm not doing one for an idiot on reddit.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:29 PM
0

I cited zero papers, because I'm not doing legwork for someone who is close-minded. Thanks for showing my how right I was not to waste my time doing it and dismissing academic research you've never even seen nor looked for as feminist. You are disingenuous and I'm not going to waste my time. As someone that has actually done academic work, I know what I do and don't know and don't care what some idiot on an activist sub thinks.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:11 PM
0

Hey look! It's not one Harvard professor in that one Atlantic article again! If you can really only cite one piece of "science" for your "research" you haven't done any. There are dozens of studies about this stuff out there. And no, one guy from Harvard that studied trained soldiers in combat's experience isn't a good analog for the many, many studies of rape victims. I don't suspect you care about the truth, but you probably should actually do a literature review if you are serious about this.…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 05:43 PM
0

Aka a science guy. This guy might be traumatized by this. I guess you don’t care.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 07:53 AM
0

You can tell most of the time wjen the guys a dick in court and when the woman are making shit up. You sound like you've seen a lot of these then. Are you an attorney or something?
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:38 AM
0

What were the specifics of your case? What did she allege? What really happened? What's the story? Sounds interesting.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:37 PM
1

I know how the system works. I'm asking about his specific situation.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:09 PM
0

How'd you wind up in sexual assault court?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 08:38 PM
1

Any zero subscribers to this sub could fuck her. And they sad about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/19 04:04 AM
0

Yeah that's just false. We are social creatures. Always have and always will be. You are delusional if you think you do it alone right now. You are helped along literally every day.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:53 PM
1

You live in a society, bro. We all need to help each other. You don't live on an island. Activism is literally complaining about how society is or isn't helping/recognizing/respecting certain groups.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:50 PM
1

That's your shitty moral compass then. If you don't expect different people to help groups they aren't a part of, then don't expect help from any normally adjusted men or any women.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:46 PM
-1

Now you want to share victimhood with an old man in an old video. Truly pathetic.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:29 PM
0

Being a shitty person isn't the way to get women to notice you.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:27 PM
-1

I haven't stepped on cracks and haven't broken my back! Checkmate, feminists. The lady doth protest too much. You're lonely. It's okay. It gets better. Well it does if you stop being a scared bigot.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:08 AM
-1

Oh they definitely are. You're one of them.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:29 AM
0

You aren't in any danger because they don't pay attention to you anyway. And you know it.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:29 AM
0

Let's pour one out for your victimhood.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:21 AM
-1

So it's only toxic when they do it, eh?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:39 AM
2

Fair nuff.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:22 AM
1

You know fuckall. So stfu and talk about something you something about, like being lonely and disliked by women.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:00 AM
-7

Which has fuckall to do with what trans people go through, which you mocked. If you don’t know, just shut up. They have it fucking rough. They are bullied, have trouble with finding love and partners, are discriminated against bigly, and are raped at extremely high rates. Talk about something else.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 02:14 AM
1

Tell me what you think the typical transgender person faces. Let's see what you actually know. I'd bet a weeks pay its fucking nothing but ignorance. Go for it chief.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 02:01 AM
-1

More broad brush bullshit. What a toxic sub this has become.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:45 AM
0

Fucking really? Transgender folks have a rough time of it as it is and you are making up some stupid story where they are all men that are just tired of the hard time that poor men have. Wtf is wrong with this sub? Is this the kind of nonsense that seems reasonable around here?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:44 AM
-7

Ah yes, some women are bad so all women should be avoided. Let me guess, you are one of these MGTOW losers?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:42 AM
-2

That's a pretty broad brush you using there. Can you imagine if I picked the most misogynistic posters on this sub and held that up as all men's rights activists? You'd lose your shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:39 AM
1

How is it an evolutionary response to scarcity? There isn't much "malagency" in scientific literature that studies early man, from what I've found. It seems mostly an online meme in men's rights circles. So I'd be surprised if someone managed to make a strong evolutionary case that isn't a just so story. I'm asking because you sound reasonable and I'm honestly curious the case being made here.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 05:15 PM
1

That it was evolved from scarcity.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:23 PM
1

I would note that you made a lot of generalizations about father's day and mother's day that aren't evidenced here. I think when it comes to control, something like 80% of marriages have the man routinely giving in to the wife, and the wife routinely getting her way. Unless I missed it somewhere, you cited a study that found that it was 43%. which is a plurality of those surveyed. I'm not sure why a study into demand versus withdrawal behavior in relationships is that relevant, tbh. While it see…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 09:55 PM
0

The realities of the "ball and chain" are pretty well established on an academic level though. I'm a research guy. What are you citing here? It sounds like your arguments are anecdotes about this. I'm old enough to remember 30 years ago and other than social media magnifying idiots in a way that wasn't done then, which is probably driving people's perceptions, it seems about the same. Social media isn't reality. All my dad friends enjoy father's day with the families every year, if we are going …
/r/MensRights14/11/19 08:46 PM
2

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:34 PM
3

you're not 50, you know you're not, I know you're not. 50 year olds don't talk about these what ifs, what I want it to be is irrelevant. Go talk to a few and you get a feel for how they talk (protip, they don't talk like a millenial) You're right. I'm not 50. I'm 49. But let's unpack how stupid your line of reasoning is. I'm not old, because I don't know things. But I'm old-fashioned because I think that marriages imply commitment and people that make them shouldn't selfishly cheat. Thinking tha…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:18 PM
2

Narcissistic != NPD in casual conversation. So now you doubt my age because my experience isn't what you want it to be, despite not really sharing any of it. Some of my friends are happily married with both spouses committed. Some have a spouse that has or is cheating. Some have a dominant male, some a dominant female. Some have a male breadwinner, some have a female breadwinner. Some have kids, some don't. Some are happy, some less so. Committing to a family comes with costs and it comes with r…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:08 PM
-5

Having a personal crisis isn't really that insulting of a frame. They are called cheating whores, not someone having a "crisis".
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:51 PM
-5

I thought we were talking about the stereotype of mid-life crisis, which in my mind usually involves using that status symbol to sleep with other women.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:44 PM
-7

That's pretty selfish when you have a family that you have made a commitment to. We are talking about the stereotype narrative here. Obviously not everyone is the same. It's narcissistic. I'm nearly 50.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:40 PM
-12

It's about a man who buys that sports car to attract the attention and sex of younger women, while the wife stays at home tending the family. It's not just about a car.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:36 PM
0

The point about marriage is almost a given, especially when you look at engagements and weddings and everything. We could pull out statistics about nagging, and how women control most marriages (the so-called "ball and chain"). Or how husbands tend to be used for free labor around the house, and for money that the wife doesn't have to work for. But all of that has been covered a bunch of times around here. Married guy here. Nowhere in that overgeneralization of men and women is anything about ga…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:34 PM
-6

You are comparing someone that cheats and/or leaves their spouse and shirks their responsibilities to their families with someone getting plastic surgery, a victimless crime. Really?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:27 PM
-12

It's a characterization of men that don't meet their obligations to their families. There is some line where self-interest becomes selfish and inconsiderate to a family and this term describes going over that line.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:25 PM
1

The main issue with malagency is that it was evolved as a response to a dangerous and scarce environment. Do you have a source for this?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:23 PM
1

That's pretty vague. Is your life really that bad?
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:18 PM
1

Anyways, I blew up on my friend who won’t believe me and told her that men have gone to jail for this kind of thing and that she shouldn’t be saying that. For pressuring a girl into consensual sex? If this has ever happened, its an edge case. I would technically have committed a felony and courts are typically very biased against men in these kinds of cases. Where do you live that you think a prosecutor is going to take up this case? You are worrying about gossip. I'm sorry that your friend didn…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:26 PM
2

What is your solution to getting more men in college?
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:23 PM
1

How has it made your life worse?
/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:21 PM
1

These seem like marginal concerns. These mostly aren't anything to worry about because people don't have that much trouble getting along.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:30 PM
1

Notice how you have to change it to criticize it. I'm done here. You are just wanting reasons to be rude to people. That makes you an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/19 01:44 AM
1

You are making up some stupid story to try and make something easy hard. If you meet someone, you introduce themselves. If they are trans, they will literally tell you their preferred pronouns. Stop trying to make it hard to discriminate against people you are scared of.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 11:51 PM
1

You are trying so hard to make something easy hard. And you probably think that SJWs are snowflakes. Buahahaha!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 11:38 PM
1

Where's that research at? Any good research will put potential confounders and strength of research in the paper. It will be published in a high quality journal and peer reviewed. You'd know this if you were a statistician. You'd further know that statistical criticisms of research is extremely important. So where's the research?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 11:16 PM
1

Would you really say the same about any social science? And if you would, then why bother saying it at all? I would. It's observational, emergent phenomena, among the most difficult to get right. You say it because it's true and partly explains why the research doesn't exist. Kinda punctures your argument, eh? But let's dispense with this. You made the claim. Pony up the research and stop pretending you know what it is or what it says.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 09:48 PM
1

You get introduced. They will literally tell you what they prefer. Reading is hard. You don't care though. You obviously just want to hate on them and pretend it's hard. Anyone that has done it knows it's not functionally different than any other introduction. But whatever preserves your sense of unearned superiority, I guess.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 09:25 PM
0

You aren't operating in good faith. Difficult doesn't mean impossible, but it does mean difficult. Pretending otherwise is being dishonest. Why are extremists always so dishonest? It's weird thing. Its almost like a general moral failure.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 09:09 PM
0

You either don't know anything about research and are lying about having a degree in statistics (likely) or you are just wanting to handwave away the literal fundamental basis of science. Or both. You can't cite it because it doesn't exist. It is so incredibly complex that it is extremely difficult to tease out anything meaningful. This is obvious to anyone that has much experience consuming research. I'm positive you don't or you wouldn't say the stupid shit you are saying here.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 08:11 PM
1

No, that's what people that are ignorant believe based on nothing but listening to JP and his bullshit. And I never said that because it's not true. It's no different than people's names. You get introduced. They will literally tell you what they prefer. And if they expect you to magically know it, they are assholes. And guess what? They don't do that. But if you decide ahead a time you won't call people what they respectfully request you call them, you are the asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 07:59 PM
1

Oh, so you don't know how this works, which isn't surprising. But you feel so passionately about it! Maybe learn first before siding with someone that is being needlessly toxic then. This is what he relies upon to sell his bullshit shtick. He knows that it's not a big deal and that it doesn't lead to fucking Nazi concentration camps. He's relying on people being so stupid that they'll ignorantly cheer it on like some caveman with a turkey leg in their hand.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 06:43 PM
0

So you’ve got no research backing and pretend that confounders are a made up concern. Get the fuck out of here. You got nothing but bigotry and you know it.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 05:48 PM
1

He is extremely unlikely to run into any of these people. I live in a liberal city and know transgender folks and I know exactly one they/them. And I know like five regular transgender folks. If you can remember someone's name, you can remember a fucking pronoun. Being a whiny little bitch and being so put out about having remember a literal name when everyone has a different one is just bigotry. Boo fucking hoo. And he goes around telling guys they need to toughen up, be men, and take care of t…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 05:32 PM
0

Then you should know that there are so many confounders that haven't been teased out in any good study. All you have is messy observational data. That's it. Learn to science.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 04:26 AM
-1

Probably best I don't talk about racial differences in criminality Oh Jesus you are one of those. Okay. I recommend taking some actual classes on statistics and science to learn how to think more clearly about this and race and crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 04:11 AM
2

No one is saying that biology is irrelevant. It's tremendously important. Yes, it affects culture. But yes, culture can be used to encourage our more positive traits. Or not. It is unnatural to ride around in cars, use spreadsheets, and all the other technology we use. It's not immoral though. It's also unnatural for the Taliban to ban music. And it's natural for ISIS to engage in mass rapes, taking of sex slaves, and all the other horrible shit they do. What's the different between places that …
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 03:08 AM
1

I totally agree. I think he practices what I’ve read described as obscurantism. He purposefully talks in overly complicated ways that are difficult to parse that hides the fact he isn’t really saying anything. And when he is, what’s right isn’t new and what new is wrong. He’s like listening to Russell Brand. You go on this verbose word journey and when you decode it, it’s just empty bullshit. He is what uneducated people think someone educated and smart sounds like.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:51 AM
1

I dunno Peterson, put aside your political axe you are grinding and say the "damn pronouns" who are simply people who earnestly believe they were born a different sex than their gender. It's not hard to call people what they ask you to.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:15 AM
0

You are simply taking it to the other extreme and assume it's all biological and presumably biology is therefore moral. We need for culture to impede natural biology in many cases or we get lawlessness, unpunished rapes, murders and stealing. We will be complete assholes to people outside our tribe. All of that is natural and immoral.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/19 02:04 AM
0

Can you be milked?
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:02 PM
3

Men like titties.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:23 AM
0

Well then be sure to avoid fucking children. We wouldn't want the world to have another pedo..
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:34 AM
0

If you're talking to a 7 year old about sex, hormones, and transitioning - you're a pedo. You're talking about it. So you're a pedo. Good to know, Mr. Pedo. Seriously though, are you okay? It seems like your life might not be going to way you want it too. You all right?
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:13 AM
0

You're asking why people hate child abusers and pedophiles? So your delusion is that anyone that disagrees with you is a pedophile. That's not insane at all.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:20 AM
0

Why are extremists so insulting if you dare to disagree with them? It’s an odd thing. Makes sense though. If you knew how to get along with differences, you wouldn’t hold the views you do. You can’t. So here we are.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:10 PM
0

As is bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 08:19 AM
1

Is it wrong to take advantage of some sexually when they are drunk? Funny how everyone pretends no one does it, yet nearly no one will condemn it. Simple question. Is it wrong?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:21 PM
1

Do you think it’s wrong? I’ve asked that over a half dozen times and only had one admit it was wrong.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:09 PM
1

Now you’ve run out of arguments so pretend I’m admitting something. What a loser.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:09 PM
1

Go to college and find out. You agree that would be rape, right?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:01 PM
1

Studying troops, who have training and in wartime isn't a good analog for sexual assault and it strains credulity to use it. And he is comparing trial testimony of people that have processed traumatic events with people being interviewed within 24 hours of the event. It's like he doesn't even know what issue he is addressing. But here we are. Funny how they can't find anyone that studies trauma and memory in sexual assault survivors, isn't it? You aren't troubled by that because you decided the …
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:56 PM
-1

I go to daily wire for all my science!
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:24 PM
-1

You believe in science? How dumb. You need to hear this anecdote instead
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:08 PM
1

Of course. That’s the definition. He has to consent. Very few women claim rape because of simply regretting sex. That’s a nonissue in the real world. The vast majority of rape claims are true. Of the false ones, a good chunk aren’t even named accusations. Of the ones that are, revenge is by far the most common reason. People are taking issue because they don’t actually know about the topic and are activists that live in a bubble.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:49 AM
0

That’s all rather ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:45 AM
0

That’s just assertions.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:44 AM
1

You don't have to report. In my wife's experience, most people that come for an exam after this kind of rape don't report. They just want to know their health is being looked after and they might collect evidence in case they change their minds. There is nothing wrong with you deciding to not report. The data suggests that most of the female perpetration happens when the boys are kids. It scoops all of that into one lifetime bucket. During adulthood, it happens but is less common. But everyone n…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:54 PM
1

Sounds like those women needed someone to tell them, at some point, that was immoral. Don't you think? Most feminists would agree that you were raped four times, I'd bet. Many men on this sub would argue that you shouldn't have gotten that drunk. I know because I've had multiple interactions with these men (presumably). Btw, my wife is a forensic nurse and, depending on the state and statute of limitations, you can still make a report. Did you make a report at the time?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:57 PM
-1

Given how many men think it's okay to take advantage and have sex with a drunk woman, I'd say some conversations need to be had. You agree that would be wrong, correct? It's obvious and you don't need to be told that. Right?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:04 PM
0

I'm asking a hypothetical. Assuming that is what they are doing, that is wrong, is it not? Remember how it was so obvious what was right and wrong about rape just a couple posts ago? Good times.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:52 PM
1

What's odd is that you say this is obvious, but I've had plenty of claims on this sub that it is fine and the responsibility of whoever is drunk, so preying upon someone drunk for sex is a-ok. Maybe people on this sub need to read this, because it seems many don't know this. And I don't think it's just this sub. Taking advantage of a drunk female was damn near considered a right of passage when I was college age. I'd say those men needed to hear that it was wrong too. The same goes for the membe…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:15 PM
1

So all these college parties where guys are trying to get some freshman girl wasted to shuttle her off somewhere and fuck her. They all know that’s wrong and do it anyway. Is that what you are saying?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:41 PM
1

Didn’t answer my question. It is not equal during adulthood.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:39 PM
-3

Men and women routinely take advantage of people that are drunk because they are less likely to say no. In my experience it's far more commonplace with men taking advantage of women, but I've seen it happen both ways. Do you believe that it is immoral to take advantage of someone that is intoxicated in order to have sex with them? Why or why not?
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:56 PM
1

You sound pretty sensitive to someone suggesting boys and girls need moral instruction. Somehow that's "disgusting."
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:54 PM
-2

Your hostility over nothing makes you sound unconfident in your beliefs.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:10 PM
-2

That’s not the same as teaching boys (and girls) not to take advantage of wasted people for sex. I’ve literally seen it defended here as acceptable. So it seems like conversations could be had to improve the status quo. Women are on guard for this btw. That “cockblocking” women do for their drunk friends can sometimes be rape prevention.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:30 PM
2

There aren't details on the case, but if a woman brought the suit in the US, she wouldn't have standing to claim discrimination based on her male gender.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:25 PM
-1

There are plenty of all male boy scout troops and camps.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:22 PM
3

I'm not sure who "people" are in this case, but men can sue successfully for title ix stuff.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:21 PM
1

I'm not sure I would assume those are all the same women. That's just lumping half of humanity into one strawman bucket.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:15 PM
1

I think it's reasonable to tell boys that no means no and not to prey on overly intoxicated women, don't you? I have a daughter and when it is appropriate, we will have a conversation entailing sexual assault prevention. If I had a boy, I would have a similar conversation about the subject from both sides, raping and preventing rape. Although the concern during adulthood is higher for the female than the male, as most male rape happens during childhood from older predators.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:12 PM
1

Sounds lonely and assuming women are all terrible. You sure it's not your assumptions embedded in the approach that is the problem and not all those women and their "bullshit"?
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:09 PM
0

His "reasoning" is links of evidence. Yours is a just so story fed by your biases. Come on now.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:01 PM
0

"Chemical castration" is the more controversial title given to using puberty blockers to give more time to ensure a kid is positive about potential transition at a later age. They are puberty blockers. Doctors won't chemically transition a child at 7 years old. If you find one that did from a reputable source, I'd like to see it please.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:00 PM
13

Where is this school?
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:56 PM
0

Screenshot a minute after it was created. I'm sure that's a completely organic post.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:32 PM
2

Or maybe you are missing the point in that this case was groundbreaking and a new legal concept. She was the pussy example.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 04:45 AM
1

That’s not how statistics works.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 04:35 AM
0

Okay rapey dude. Keep apologizing for sex crimes. And learn what ad hominem means. You sound dumb and rapey.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:51 AM
0

You don’t even know what that means, but okay. Try not to rape people. And tell women that you will try and fuck them if they get drunk around you whether they want you to or not.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:59 PM
0

As evidenced by a media article with an anecdote. And then calling someone obtuse and stupid when they point that obvious fact out. Whew lad. Your self-awareness is so poor it should be studied.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:59 PM
1

I'm not saying you are wrong because you sound like you want to rape. But you sound like someone that wants to rape. You are claiming that someone can use someone's drunkenness to get around their consent. That is immoral. Full stop. And it's how rapists think and behave. The notion that you get to fuck someone that wouldn't normally fuck you because they are drunk is immoral. If you are such a loser that you can't get someone to have sex with you while making the decision while they are sober, …
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:19 PM
0

One person made it up so all of them are just making it up so I can just make it all up. Sounds persuasive.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:59 PM
-1

Found the wannabe rapist.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 04:29 AM
0

I get that. My partner is a SANE nurse manager in a top 12 city. In 2017, this city took exactly one sexual assault to trial (city > one million population). The victim was male, oddly enough. She has first-hand witnessed the lack of appropriate response of police and prosecutors. The investigators are overworked and cannot possibly conduct proper investigations. They are mostly looking to leave sex crimes and see it as a stepping stone to "sexier" investigations, like robbery and homicide. They…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:10 AM
0

Rich, K. krich@maryu. marywood. ed. (2019). Trauma-Informed Police Responses to Rape Victims. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(4), 463–480 I can go on, but why bother. You don't really care. There dozens of links you won't go through in these reports. Some are behind paywalls reserved for those that conduct research, like myself.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:50 AM
1

Lathan, E., Langhinrichsen, R. J., Duncan, J., & Stefurak, J. “Tres.” (2019). The promise initiative: Promoting a trauma‐informed police response to sexual assault in a mid‐size southern community. Journal of Community Psychology.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:47 AM
1

Cuevas, K. M. ( 1 ), Balbo, J. ( 2 ), Duval, K. ( 2 ), & Beverly, E. A. ( 2 ). (n.d.). Neurobiology of sexual assault and osteopathic considerations for trauma-informed care and practice. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 118(2), e2–e10.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:46 AM
1

ADAMS HILLARD, P. J. (2019). Why and how to perform trauma-informed care. Contemporary OB/GYN, 64(8), 15–17.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:46 AM
1

Neurobiology of Sexual Assault and Osteopathic Considerations for Trauma-Informed Care and Practice Kristen M. Cuevas, OMS II; Jane Balbo, DO; Krista Duval, DO; Elizabeth A. Beverly, PhD
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:43 AM
1

Trauma is an enormous field. This is stupid. If you care, do your homework. Hint, Campbell isn't a researcher. It is in education, healthcare, and many other fields. I'm doing a masters thesis on it as we speak. Either look it up or don't. But claiming it is all political is the height of ignorance. You aren't worth my time, so why would I bother?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:30 AM
0

The irony is that you accuse anyone that is a feminist of being untrustworthy based on your assumption that they are feminists. Of course you are a self-admitted activist expecting people to take you seriously, despite your claims that activists should be ignored. Hilariously stupid and ignorant.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:24 AM
1

If trauma informed police investigations mean never remarking when an accusers story contradicts itself, or is a provable lie, then how can any man accused of rape ever hope to be exonerated? Turns out that isn't what it means. But you don't know because you don't actually care beyond media reports that aren't science. You are completely ignorant and full of shit.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:22 AM
0

You just implied that having sex with someone that cannot legally consent is fine and allows ugly dudes to get laid. That's so stupid it deserves no response, except to say that have no moral compass.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:00 AM
1

If you care, look it up. There is vast research on trauma affects. Hell freeze response is known for literally decades. That article is shit and I'm not referring to Campbell, who isn't conducting science.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:59 AM
-1

Feminists feminists feminists. Ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem. Anyone that thinks that false rape statistics are misleading and inflates claims from people like me are wrong because feminism. That's just pathetic dude. And you are so blind that you basically delusional at this point.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:38 AM
0

Trauma based investigations stem from the "Believe the Victim" movement which has been thoroughly debunked. You have no clue what you are talking about. Literally none. Just stop. You are embarrassing yourself. You are pretending the trauma informed care comes from rape cases, when it is used in health care, education, as well as police investigations. It's also used in police involved shootings for interview protocols to get accurate statements from cops that shoot people. I guess those cops ar…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:36 AM
-1

That is actual psuedo science that means if a person lies, it is evidence that a rape took place. It is far from pseudo-science. That you say this shows that you have no idea what you are talking about. You don't even know what the implications are, as what you are saying is the opposite of what is being discovered. You also seem to place actual stock in the 1 in 6 statistic, which includes drunk sex and in many cases, those surveys are self selected. It's not a single study. They find different…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:18 AM
-2

Which doesn't mean that all studies aren't useful and that simply making shit up based on anecdotes like this sub is famous for is a reasonable substitute. And these studies have essentially been replicated, given the number of them. If you actually care about science, you know that I'm right and you'll admit it.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 12:46 AM
1

A single idiot is the best explanation for a single stupid note. It’s not some conspiracy.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 11:05 PM
1

These numbers don't come from "proven claims" whatever that means. They come from a category that includes reports that are believed to be true by police, but simply aren't rape. They come from rape reports that are unnamed, meaning that it is likely a "boogieman" which doesn't actually exist at all and incapable of destroying anyone's life. It also can include: Victims deciding not to cooperate with investigators Inconsistencies in victim statement Insufficient evidence to proceed to prosecutio…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:45 PM
-4

I'll first take issue with the terrible title of a blogger who isn't a researcher, but uses a smear against actual researchers that are simply writing what researchers have actually found. It's an ad hominem in the damn title and we are meant to take this seriously? In other words, the studies the report cites are admittedly inaccurate, which in turns means that neither the researchers nor the police have any real idea how frequently false accusations occur. They merely have data on the instance…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:21 PM
-3

I'd bet a weeks pay you haven't done the research to know whether this is true or not and simply assumed.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:35 PM
1

You are a child. Now you are a blocked child yelling at nothing.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:25 PM
-1

As to your question, do I think it's wrong to try and fuck somebody that wouldn't fuck me when I'm sober, the answer to that is no, I don't think it's wrong. But at the same time, that's not something I would do because I wouldn't personally be interested in that. Guys who aren't terribly attractive or who have a hard time socializing might be less picky about that. Your moral compass is broken. Getting people to consent to much of anything they wouldn't normally do because they are intoxicated …
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:11 PM
0

There is ample research on this. Try looking it up instead of asking misspelled questions to strangers on reddit.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:05 PM
0

I waded through irrelevant shit to your point for about a thousand words. Either post it or don't. I'm not reading a bunch of crap to find out you have no data. you fucking feminist. How immature are you?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:04 PM
1

Because they are measured through means other than reporting. Assuming a crime didn't happen because it isn't reported is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:56 PM
1

Cite the relevant data for your claim. I'm not reading some layperson idiots blog.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:53 PM
1

Then post the data.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:36 PM
1

2% is the minimum figure produced by a methodology that measures provably false allegations. This isn't true. Claims are almost never provably true nor false. If you mean legal process, that isn't true. If you mean an investigation, that isn't true either. Sex crimes investigators are overworked with caseloads that are too large to properly investigate. This is different than other crimes, like homicide. So investigators will triage the claims and try and put them into some category to allow the…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:16 PM
1

Lack of data doesn't mean you make up whatever number you want. Here is a good breakdown of how police data is gathered and problems with using it to make claims about false reporting.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:05 PM
1

There are different reasonable studies and you chose the one with the highest rate. I don't think that should be considered a credible claim.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:51 PM
0

It's designed to prevent people from taking advantage of people who are blind, falling over drunk. Do you agree that it is wrong to try and fuck someone that wouldn't fuck you if they were sober?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:45 PM
3

This to me seems like some sort of feminist action group. Based on your investigation of...checks notes...looking at a pic. Let the upvotes flow! What else could this be?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:39 PM
2

How do you know it's because she is pushing for it and not some other collection of causes?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:35 PM
-12

So if I generalized men's rights advocates based on some of the more misogynist comments on this sub, you would say?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:31 PM
0

This sub does a lot of that, tbf.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:30 PM
1

Oh please. That was idiotic.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:13 AM
-1

It's clearly sarcasm to anyone with a middle school level of social interaction. Jesus Christ you are fucking dumb. I'm blocking you lest I become dumber by interacting with someone so dumb.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:37 AM
0

Except I'm male and don't. Your heuristic is garbage. And if you believe I was mind reading, then I was correct in my thoughts that you do hate men. That's the dumbest fucking thing I've read this week. And I read a lot of dumb shit on reddit.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:34 AM
-1

You downvote a comment simply because you disagree and then respond with a non-sequitur, mind reading, straw man. Dude, grow up. That's pathetic.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:20 AM
-1

Clearly that means men are disposable and not anything else.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:14 AM
1

Only the links I provided that proved my points. A general search that didn't show much of anything and a men's rights link? That's hilarious, but illuminating as far as what you consider "proof".
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:45 AM
1

No. And that video isn't the only source of information either, now is it. Do you claim to know anything beyond this video?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:34 AM
1

So this is based on an assumption that MEN’S rights supporters over there know the law. Well they don’t over here and make absurd claims about how easy it supposedly is to falsely accuse and “ruin lives”. I guess they don’t either.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:40 PM
1

Which laws? The ones that criminalized rape? Be specific.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:11 PM
1

Remove the women or the rape laws directed at penalizing men and the extortion ring falls apart. Remove the male perpetrators and the crime can still work. You seam to want to make it the men's fault that the crime happened and turn the women into victims. I didn't bring up feminism but since you did this "men bad woman victim" assumption is a very common feminist thing to do. Show me where this is happening in a ring run solely by women. You can even cherry-pick the story. You made a positive a…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:09 PM
2

Those are peer-reviewed, empirical statistics. Then you should be able to provide citations for your claims. And yes these views where women have always had it easy and men have always had it harder, as if work type was the only thing worth measuring and as if women didn't also have jobs and raise kids and as if single moms are at always at fault for being single moms are rooted in sexist ideas. You are blind to it. Feel free to evidence your beliefs with actual science though.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:23 PM
1

I didn't make a claim except to give context to the situation. And those numbered questions were in a response where you ignored most of what I said. I guess the sequence doesn't matter here. The picture of the ring is showing the gender of those that are committing the crimes. I'm guessing the men are in charge. This clearly isn't feminism run amok. And you have no clue as the greater context, which you didn't address. Show me evidence of rape gangs that didn't just turn out to be isolated inci…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:18 PM
-4

That's clearly not what is prompting my response. Are you always completely dishonest when defending your sexist statements?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:04 PM
1

Clearly we should ignore obvious statistical trends because petrostates exist. Or something. I'm sure you are living in SA because it's so nice, right?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:03 PM
0

Like this one? Turns out cherry-picking articles isn't a good way to decide what is happening in a country, as I just demonstrated. Why does that article exist if the rape and extortion of women isn't some big problem? Huh? Checkmate bro. That's not how it works if you care about the truth. It is how it works if you are looking to justify your biased beliefs. You didn't respond to the vast majority of what I said. One of your negatives is asking me to prove a negative. "It is your job to prove t…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:48 PM
-1

Those things are all actually pretty easy, which is why men used to let women do them. That's not any more real than the other stuff you are trying to argue with me in the other thread. It's just ignorant and sexist.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:21 PM
0

they will end up unprosperous shit piles. That's patently false in the US and every country where women have greater access to labor markets. The reverse is true. In fact, female educational attainment is one the biggest correlations for economic achievement around the world.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:20 PM
0

India has a huge problem with rape and gang rape going back a long time. This had led to the rape of foreigners and their governments issuing travel advisories regarding this issue. Their legal system has been behind the times with poorly written laws that allowed many sexual assaults to occur that were simply legal. These have only recently been remedied through legal changes. India has lots of organized crime. The article posted has very little facts and it's hard to know what was going on. Bu…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:10 PM
0

You have a source, that's good. What laws are you talking about? You could claim that any law could be used as extorting for a false accusation though, right? Here are the extorters, btw.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:37 PM
-4

That doesn't sound sexist at all.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:17 PM
1

Like the US. Wait...
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:14 PM
0

I have heard Sounds like solid evidence.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:13 PM
2

This seems important. Or something.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 05:55 PM
1

I agree. Fist bump.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 10:15 PM
1

I would caution you not to treat your anecdotal experience as gospel. People have wildly different experiences and this is the exact reason we have science. There are plenty of mothers and female teachers doing great work with boys. My mother and wife are great in this regard and I'm a teacher and know some fantastic women. We need more male teachers though (and teachers of color). Have you considered going into teaching? We need men to help raise these boys, because many of them don't have Dads…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:55 PM
0

This isn't even a good way to measure that. If you care about this, the better path forward is to teach men to talk about their feelings and to listen to the feelings of other men. Until we stop calling men pussies that do that, and it's mostly men doing this, we are going to have trouble making progress.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:16 PM
7

Only the month is "overwhelming" of those three. And as a way to try and measure whether or not men are disposable? Really? Reddit is overwhelmingly male. So you are basically measuring that men like to upvote selfie's of women. I mean...so?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:59 PM
24

Seven of the top ten posts on that sub right now are men. That's more data than two cherry-picked posts.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:48 PM
5

9 is far different than a highschooler in regards to agency.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:44 PM
1

So brave.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/08/19 06:21 PM
1

Because plastic surgery is the same? Great comparison. It's damn near identical. You said you can't change someone's sex, which is trivially correct. But when it comes time to understand that same point when it works against your position, now it's off topic. All the changes are cosmetic. I'd bet a weeks pay that SRS has a higher satisfaction rate and lower rate of reversal than the vast majority of other cosmetic surgeries. And you know this is true. It's just inconvenient for you. Many of the …
/r/MensRights09/08/19 08:44 PM
1

And butchering a healthy body is not the product of a sound mind. I guess we should outlaw plastic surgery. I'm sure if I peruse your posting history you will be railing against that with the same vigor. We both know I won't find that. What experts that disagree with your position have you read? List them. If you can't, you are being dishonest. Go.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:30 AM
1

In other words you made claims without bothering to even google the hard work of other people because you have biases. Now that you are called on it, you wuss out with "no you". I didn't make the claim. I'm questioning your knowledge base. And we both know that you don't know jack shit. And you know it.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:41 PM
1

I asked for research and you cite YouTube. 😂😂😂 So you are very emotional about something you haven’t found research for. I get it. But it’s not convincing to people that value science and not emotions. Show me your data. Or not. But blathering on without having even a serious discussion isn’t convincing. Changing ones appearance to match the opposite SEX is a SEX Change. Cutting the penis off and digging a six inch hole is a SEX change. It's implicit. That you think that pointing out that the la…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:30 PM
1

Do you know that people die in hospitals from medical errors? Clearly we should get rid of hospitals. I’m a science guy. Show me your data.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:24 PM
1

One more thing you cannot change your sex. No one said you can. Why would you think this is some kind of point to make? So you are unaware of any research that gave you pause? None? What has your search consisted of?
/r/MensRights08/08/19 04:11 AM
1

I’m not really interested in talking to them, as I don’t think they are open minded and truth seekers. I’m also not knowledgeable enough to give a good representation of the science and research. As I said, I don’t think they care about that nor are they persuadable. The fact is that activists are by and large disinterested in the truth, in my experience. I’ve interacted with Honey Badger and she was frankly rude and embarrassingly confused in her thinking. The science is there and you have goog…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:16 PM
1

I have. That’s why I’m pushing back.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:38 PM
-2

Do you have any credentials in this field? Can you cite research you have showing the rate that people decide not to transition after puberty blocker and any related health effects? Because my wife's a nurse involved in transgender health care and I'm pretty sure she knows her shit better than a reddit men's right's poster. We are interested in the truth here and not opinions formed by browsing the internet, right?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:07 PM
-6

I don't think you know much about puberty blockers, because you are using a term that isn't synonymous. Boys and girls put on puberty blockers can and do reproduce if they are discontinued. It's more akin to hitting a pause button on puberty. You don't know anything neutral about this specific case. It's all filtered through. Again, you are passionate about something you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 06:18 PM
6

This isn't useful to the cause, which I think is actually important. Trespassing, jamming cameras in a doctor's face, getting into physical scuffles with her. They come off as unhinged. Protest legally, lobby legislatures, go to the media, these are all good ways to go about it. This is terrible.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:19 PM
-5

We have no idea what the real story is here. We do know that claiming "chemical castration" is dishonest, as that isn't what happens at this age, even if you find a doctor to sign onto this. And the Story section is filled with other myths, like using Post-Pardum depression to stigmatize the mother and claiming that it is still going on years after the fact, a diagnosis made by the father himself, which would be an extreme outlier. If we only have one side of the story and we know some of it is …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:12 PM
-2

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:23 AM
-5

If you can't understand the degrees of effect and focus on sexism like a binary thing, you won't understand what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:45 PM
-5

Or include women. But let's stop pretending it's cramping anyone's style. Because there are real men's right's issues that need addressing and if you focus on silly shit, no one will listen to any of it.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:25 PM
2

Politics is another source, in all likelihood. Men are more likely to be Republicans. They seem to view recycling is something liberals do.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:29 PM
3

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:25 PM
-10

If this is a big complaint among men's right's activists, they will look like fools and continue to be ignored. We haven't had a draft in forever and are unlikely to have one in our lifetimes. This is whining about something that is completely symbolic at this point.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:12 PM
5

But if you are breaking arms, breaking everyone's is fair. You seem to think unfair means anything you don't like.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:11 PM
-27

You know when people say this sub is full of ignorant wingnuts? This is the kind of stuff they are referring to.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:09 PM
1

Your the one that can’t fathom bodily autonomy and think people are obligated to have sex because they went into a room, ignoring any of a number of good reasons that might happen. It’s so fucking retarded it’s breathtaking. You didn’t mention any of those things guys do that are so horrible. Feel free to actually do so.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:54 PM
1

It’s real straightforward. It’s not your body and you don’t control it. Funny how you aren’t mentioning anything men do to lead women on. Guess that doesn’t happen.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:49 PM
1

No it isn’t. No one is obligated to begin nor continue any sex act ever. This is human rights 101. It doesn’t matter the gender or orientation either. Take an ethics class or something.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 09:10 PM
1

So you go into a guys bedroom and he starts mistreating you, you just have to fuck him because that's what women should do so men don't get sad. And don't change your mind or decide to do something other than sex, because that's no longer your choice. You went into a certain room and that means you do what the man wants, you dirty slut! Not rape apologia at all. Not even a metric ton.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:37 PM
1

And if then the guy asks you to go to his room and you go what are you expecting? Just talking? Seriously? Women cannot change their mind and can get raped so that they don't hurt men's feefees. Wtf is wrong with you? I'm betting you are male and just larping like a loser.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:31 PM
1

Because a woman can’t dance with a guy if she doesn’t want to fuck him. I’m trying to imagine actually believing that in 2019.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 03:50 PM
1

And this is why we can’t have nice things. Unless women behave the way I want they are “cunts”. What a loser.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:28 PM
1

Women should change their behavior so as not to have fun, but ensure that fragile men don’t get hurt. After all, they are here for you!
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:36 PM
0

That’s not how it works. You can dance however you want and still decide not to fuck someone. Guess y’all don’t know that.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:39 PM
-1

No it plainly isn’t. The truth is in the name.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 05:45 PM
-5

Better than enjoying women being beaten and acting like you think your lack of wax is funny to you. Try acting human. They will fuck you too!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 05:27 PM
-25

Laying next to a naked woman right now. You have your pathetic little dick in your hand. We both know I’m right. Turns out not hating women gets them to willingly fuck you.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 02:41 PM
-27

Sorry you have trouble with other people getting laid and like to see women get hurt. Poor little loser.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 02:36 PM
-43

Oh look at woman is hurt and the neckbeards are happy because they are losers.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 01:23 PM
3

The fact that people aren't much leaving in droves says it's not that bad. Not that it can't get better, but it's pretty damn good.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/19 01:22 AM
1

I know far more about your views than you do mine.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:20 PM
1

Says the guy in an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:13 PM
1

Thank goodness this one person no one much knows said something we can read. Get a life Jesus.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:20 AM
-6

He didn’t get what I said. Cool spelling bro.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:03 AM
-7

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:07 AM
-16

Women will let you die if there isn't a man to step up and put himself in danger. Sure was. Just like this was.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 10:26 PM
-23

You mean like men are violent and need to be socialized not to be savages? Or only the women stuff.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 10:18 PM
2

Looks like there was a court appearance.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 10:13 PM
2

That’s an editorialized headline. Where are men sent to prison without a hearing?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:54 PM
-11

Pretty sure he did it. He told a lot of lies and misleading statements and she came off as credible. Sam Harris has a great breakdown of the difference in their testimonies and he is far from an sjw. And if you read articles that took a deeper dive on his statements, like how that party wasn’t close enough for him to attend when it wasn’t far at all, you start to see a clear pattern of deceit.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:51 PM
11

Seems obvious to me. If I was that guy I’d rather young strong men as a chain is only as strong as it’s weakest link.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:48 PM
-24

Let’s generalize!
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:46 PM
2

I wrote all of that that directly responds to what you said and you post a video about Keanu hand hovering. Okay.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 06:57 PM
2

If I say "I'll give you a part in this movie if you have sex with me," and a girl has sex with me.. is that rape? Most of the time, no. But in the case of Weinstein, turning him down was the real threat of loss of a career. He had some of them stalked and harassed by former Mossad, which is chilling. In that case, the implicit threat puts it in the category of rape, although it would be hard to prosecute for that, since it wasn't explicit. But he could and did ruin careers of women that turned h…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 06:46 PM
2

I'm going to suggest that you know more about the rape data to back what you are saying. I'm not interested in your personal anecdotes, because you weren't in the room when it happened and don't have a real investigation with teeth that can look at what happened. This leads to gossip, innuendo, and rumors. And a sample survey of people you know is the worst way to see if something is pervasive. That's not useful here. You wouldn't accept it from women talking about how all of their friends have …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 06:17 PM
0

It isn't illegal for a woman to rape a man in the UK by having sex with him. Rape requires penetration there. But if a man rapes another man (which is the most commonly reported rape by adult men) it is a crime. So it is illegal in the UK for men to be raped by other men in prison, just as it is in the US. You speak of a fact that people don't care that men are raped and there is some truth to that. But if men's rights advocates really want to gain traction stopping male rape, they need to focus…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 05:46 PM
2

Do you think the meetoo movement is very important?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 05:30 PM
0

"I think the meetoo movement is a very important movement." Agree?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/19 05:20 PM
1

So you are one of these idiots that thinks middle school talk is like sounding smart. Cool. Have fun being a cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/19 09:46 PM
1

What a dishonest liar you are. You pretended that men never do that and challenged me to find very specific media stories to doubt you. This is what extremists do.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/19 06:15 PM
1

If the slipper fits, Cinderella. Of course an extremist that claims only women falsely accuse of rape isn’t an extremist. 😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 09:29 PM
1

Funny thing about extremists is that they never identify as extremists. Bigots are the same way.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 06:28 PM
1

It’s funny how Men’s rights folks act like such assholes. I wonder why that is? Maybe it’s because they are a bunch of angry extremists that can’t be civilized. And they are almost certainly over represented in the rapist department as well. Keep on reinforcing that stereotype so people continue to ignore you. Great for your cause!
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 05:25 PM
1

So men never accuse falsely because they are just better people or something. Men rape men too. My partner works in sex crimes. I don’t have to look anything up to know it happens.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/19 05:15 PM
1

Men make rape accusations too. Why would you assume only women make false rape accusations?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/19 10:59 PM
0

This story has so little information that it is unclear what is going on, tbh.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/19 10:48 PM
0

(((Deep state brah.)))
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 12:55 PM
0

I’m sure it’s all a conspiracy of the deep state and you are a very smart person that believes in that shit for morons. What a fucking loser.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 12:23 PM
0

You post on the conspiracy sub. 😂😂😂
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 12:13 PM
-1

the damage caused (and intended) is entirely different and should not carry the same penalty. That's what you said. So now you admit that you don't actually know anything about the variables that contribute to this, but pretend you do.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 12:13 AM
0

What is the typical outcome for a rape accusation. Do you know? If a woman makes a false accusation against somebody and is quickly identified as such, shouldn’t it be prosecuted for the heinous act it is instead of a mere “false report”? Before I answer that, let me ask you to tell me the different kinds of false accusations. Do you know the common kinds?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 12:00 AM
-5

the damage caused (and intended) is entirely different and should not carry the same penalty. Depends on what is accused. My partner is involved in investigating sex crimes. Most accusations hurt no one and go nowhere. Most false ones are quickly identified and either ignored or (less common for a number of reasons most people don't understand) prosecuted.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/19 11:43 PM
-1

Welcome to MEN’S rights sub, where a dozen research projects are dismissed as “opinion”.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:16 PM
-1

Bury your head in the sand. Your mind is unable to be changed. And you know this.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:10 PM
1

You have presented nothing. You have picked nits of the commentary that accompanied a ton of evidence and ignored everything you didn't want to hear. It's not credible. If you don't want to be accused of rape, the absolute best way to make that a reality is to refrain from raping someone. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:58 PM
0

The type of accusation these folks fear is rare. Many if not most false accusations are unnamed. Most of the rest are parents accusing on behalf of children. If you talk to sex crimes detectives, the false accusations are pretty much all obvious and don’t harm anyone. You can’t look at a statistic that contains a bunch of different situations in one number and make up credible fears about your vulnerability. The vast majority of accusations are real. Keep reading and stop getting lies from this …
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:39 PM
-1

There is a ton of data in the post you responded to. Read it or fuck off. I don’t care.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:16 PM
0

The vast majority of accusations are truthful. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/9hr341/fact_checking_false_rape_accusations_and_why_you/
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:15 PM
-1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/9hr341/fact_checking_false_rape_accusations_and_why_you/ You're right. False rape accusations are rare. As rare as women being raped in first world countries. Citation or admit you’re wrong. I know you can’t. It’s fine. Run along.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:32 PM
-1

But you don’t then, right? It’s like playing tennis without the net. You made the claim. I asked for a citation. Now you wanna get out of doing that. You’ve done a literature review on it right?
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:14 PM
-2

Citation needed. Given available data, that is wrong by a factor of ten.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:49 AM
-5

Citation needed. You made the claim. Anecdotes aren't data.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:28 PM
2

If that's all you have found, you aren't really doing any research. If you think you have, present the other one's that have attempted to measure this, because they exist.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 08:27 PM
1

Governments get money to spend on a program so that’s why judges blah blah that’s nonsense. Don’t be a conspiracy theorist. And they do survive in donations and making the problem seem as bad as possible is how all of these groups get money. So whoosh!
/r/MensRights22/02/19 04:23 PM
2

So you believe activists who will never tell you anything different than that so they can raise money from you and you suspect the government who somehow makes money that it can simply get by taxing? I don't know what to say here.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:19 AM
2

So what you are saying is that both genders are treated the same in this policy, is that correct?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:11 AM
4

Title IX does no such thing. There is a men's group at my university that just sent me an email. Let's not make up things to be victimized by.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:31 PM
1

Barely touched the largest disparity that men face, which is racial. Black men in particular suffer the worst of any male group in the US. This is measurable in good research by Raj Chetty and its hard to come up with an explanation that isn't racism.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:45 PM
25

Way to cheapen male rape which is already cheapened. This is a reflection of the problem.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:38 PM
4

This a problem with the law. Does anyone know an advocacy organization for changes in these kinds of laws?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:35 PM
5

If anyone else is allowed to do the same thing, how is it unfair? I like men's focused organizations, since we can be different than women and can have different needs.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 08:33 PM
0

What does this mean?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:15 PM
0

How many police departments, by percent, use that model today?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:15 PM
1

That’s not what it means, but how some assholes use it. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:14 PM
2

Are you aware that the kinds of posts you are describing are also true in this sub?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:11 PM
1

You just don't understand what I'm saying which is fine. I'll give you a different example. Let's say someone says, "Influenza is a real problem and kills lots of people. We need to change our healthcare system to deal with it." The first question is obvious. This person advocates a systemic change for a systemic problem. Great. Is it a systemic problem? So they post a few cases where someone went to the hospital and died. Is that evidence for their position? Of course it isn't. You don't change…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:30 PM
1

"Systemic" in this case is a vaguely defined term that gender ideologues are using to distract the public's attention away from men's issues. You've lost it now. That's an absurd claim. I don't even read that crap, but I'm guessing it's less prevalent than economics, which I do read. If you say something is a problem, it's not because it happens three or four times, or its not a problem. Some that happens hundreds of times is the problem. Show. Your. Data.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:56 AM
1

Then we agree that it's not a systemic problem. Carry on then.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:13 AM
1

Systemic claims require systemic evidence. This is very basic science. If you say something is or isn't a problem, you don't trot out a few news stories. This is very basic. If you don't know this, you aren't really going to make sense. Your ignorance of anecdotes is painful to watch, tbh. Its such bad science. So so bad. Go learn.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:12 AM
1

Also, these are not anecdotes. They are documented incidents. facepalm
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:35 AM
1

So the women that have been raped and their rapists unpunished doesn't show a problem with the rules. But find some anecdotes where men are the victim and OMGWTFBBQ ITS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IN THE WORLD PROVE ME WRONG.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:52 AM
1

That is correct. And most people that abused that dog have the most culpability. They are the proximate cause. Without that abuse, this doesn't happen. My wife works with victims just like this girl. What they often go through is a living hell. The men that exploit sixteen years by pimping them out do things just like she described. They choke them, beat them, rape them, take money from men that rape them. They often inject drugs into their rectum, a booty bump, so they can stay up for days and …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 04:59 AM
1

If you don't know that blacks get higher sentencing for similar crimes, then look it up. If you are going to wade into judicial biases, that's a pretty big one. Where's your evidence OP's case was about gender more than other factors? What specific facts about this case indicate that, when there are other, explanatory variables. Its time to put up or shut up. You've provided no explanation, no evidence, no anything, yet pedantly ask for well-known information. And this is after being dishonest a…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:40 PM
1

Notice how well you can parse this. Gender isn't the only nor most important variable. Glad we agree.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:18 PM
1

So you say. So I explained with evidence-based reasoning. Are you able to do that? You are assuming gender is the problem, but clemency is give to men for [very similar reasons to this case.]9https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/politics/gov-hickenlooper-orders-release-for-inmate-sentenced-to-life-as-teen) History of abuse, juvenile, murder, "turned life around" clemency,and male. This is the shit feminists do. Take a story where something happens to a woman. Even though many variables could ex…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 08:00 PM
1

I'm glad you are finally being straightforward. We could have avoided all this if you would have been more honest and admitted you weren't just asking a question. It's not that hard. Plucking gender out of all of the variables is just speculation based on your biases, where mental state and minor status are well-known and oft-used and explicit legal criteria considered in every case. History of abuse is also considered, but on a case by case basis. Gender isn't, but has statistical effects on th…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:41 PM
1

You being evasive and disingenuous. You are pretending you aren't making an assertion and just "asking a question," when we both know that's not true. Why don't you be honest and just say what you mean. It sounds like a tacit admission that you know you are wrong, or you'd just mean what you say and say what you mean.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:55 PM
1

So you thought someone could answer that question. Could you be more disingenuous? That's a rhetorical question btw.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:24 PM
1

Rhetorical questions exist, but let's pretend they are a foreign concept. If playing dumb were an Olympic event etc.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:05 PM
1

The real fight is to stop over-sentencing men, particularly black men. This is about wanting vengeance on someone because they are female. If she was a he, this wouldn't be on this sub. Period.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:48 PM
1

She has continued to be violent while in prison and has bragged about what she did. Citation.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:47 PM
1

Why can't they both be victims? If you abuse a dog and it attacks someone, they are both victims. How do you completely ignore the fact that this is a sex-trafficked child that was mentally ill and just focus on gender? This is what feminists do.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:47 PM
1

Ignoring she was a sex-trafficked, mentally ill child. Nope, she's a "murdering cunt". And nice gendered insult. I'm sure that's a coincidence.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:45 PM
1

How do you look at this case and think the relevant fact is gender? This was done because she was a child that was sex trafficked. You sound like a complaining feminist. Take an anecdote. Assert that it must be gender. Act outraged.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:42 PM
2

This logic is as mature as the memes your are defending. My 7 year old knows that "they did it too" isn't a response.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:40 PM
2

Morally and legally, we hold children and the mentally ill to different standards. This is part of our jurisprudence and any reasonable ethics standard.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:38 PM
2

She claims he tried to have sex with her. It’s not really that relevant. She had diminished capacity. In any case, this isn’t a men’s rights issue. This is a wanting a woman to spend more time in jail issue.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:12 PM
2

Especially a black man, yes.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:09 AM
2

We don't actually know. She claims he was. He's not here to tell us. I'm not aware there is evidence either way.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:07 AM
1

Google the name. There is plenty. He's the one that said fuck you though. I quoted his words back to him for the lulz.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:06 AM
-3

Fuck you kept it reasonable Choose one. You can't even be honest about how you are discussing something. This is what the block feature is for.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:41 PM
1

Professor Peter Stoet said the complexity of the Global Gender Gap Index makes it difficult to distinguish whether gender differences are the result of social inequalities or personal preference.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:01 PM
-8

You sound very reasonable and articulate. Good job! Make it clear to everyone that you are unhinged and shouldn’t be listened to right off the bat.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:11 PM
1

Depends on the circumstances, obviously. But you aren't discussing in good faith when you pretend she didn't get punished.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:04 PM
1

This isn't a good faith conversation. Have a nice one.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:02 PM
-16

I’m not sure what justified means in this context. But she was punished. Given the circumstances, seems like enough to me.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:18 PM
-1

It's clearly a one-sided post that leaves out a lot of details. She was a 16year old kid being forced to prostitute herself for a pimp. Anyone that knows people that live like this knows that her life was filled with rapes and beatings etc. That's just how the streets treat young runaways. My wife (forensic nurse) sees a fair number of trafficking victims and homeless and they are targets for these kinds of sociopaths. She ended up killing the guy. She was tried as an adult and given a long sent…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:03 PM
1

Lol. Okay. If you can't talk numbers, you don't have anything. Systemic claims require systemic data. Period. Statistics 101.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:35 AM
-12

Oh look. The sub where people like watching women get hurt.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/19 12:46 AM
-4

It’s not like that in the US either. This whole stupid shit is overblown.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:01 AM
0

Man here. Yes.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:54 AM
2

Only creeps say what he said. Oh wait, generalizations are wrong. Or something.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:52 AM
-1

Doesn’t matter. He is innocent.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:15 PM
0

I don't think its all that obvious. Even professors like Jordan Peterson struggle to understand that these kind of gender averages aren't that useful for judging people. You see it with men judging women and the opposite. You see it with racial differences. People just don't understand statistics.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:26 PM
1

Singling our progressives is just as dumb as what you think they are doing. Look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:07 PM
0

The thing to understand about these kinds of statements is that they don’t reflect differences within populations, which can be quite profound. Many men are less risky than many women, even if the group average is the way you suggest. It might very well be that knowing someone’s gender isn’t as useful as many other types of information to understand their likely behavior. We also need to be careful with just so stories about evolution. It can make sense and still be wrong.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:40 PM
1

I have read many articles documenting that the rules themselves are very poorly written. I am under the impression that they were rushed into place without adequate review. That doesn't really answer my question. How do you know this is even a big problem? Anecdotes < data.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 08:52 AM
1

That is not the same thing as a court being biased against defendants who it is supposed to be judging based solely on the facts. Have you actually sat down and reflected on that or are you just assuming it's the way you say it is and dismissing it. Being an activist means that you are a person who is trying to change public policy. It does not have to mean that you are a person who doesn't consider both sides of an issue. It doesn't, but the vast majority of time they aren't considering all sid…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:51 PM
1

You seem just as biased as you claim these courts are, aren't you? You aren't a neutral observer here, but a passionate activist that is biased against these proceedings. That's fair, isn't it? You also don't seem to know what this is in response to, so I'll quote your own article, which I suspect you didn't fully read. There is no doubt that until recently, many women’s claims of sexual assault were reflexively and widely disregarded—or that many still are in some quarters. (One need look no fu…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:09 PM
1

Because of the way the law is written. Planning a shooting is illegal. It takes an affirmative step (in the US) and you are committing a crime. If you intend to publish classified material, it's not illegal (see New York Times Company v. United States). But if you actually publish it, it could be illegal. I'm not familiar with the law in Sweden (which is why I ended the sentence asking a question), but I doubt planning a violation of gender whatever is an actual crime. Feel free to dig up the la…
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:42 AM
1

I was asking. So it’s fine and the women’s festival is fine then?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:30 AM
1

Depends on how the law is written. In the US bomb construction is illegal. So possession is a crime. But I can have a gun and it isn’t a crime until I go use it. See the difference?
/r/MensRights19/12/18 02:29 AM
-6

So men's clubs that existed forever before this were wrong. Is that what you are saying?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:10 PM
-3

If the festival didn't happen, there is no crime, is there?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:09 PM
1

What was your methodology for determining your conclusions. From the outside, you seem just as biased as a kangaroo court. Is that fair to say? What was using title ix for women to sue a response to? Do you know?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 03:10 PM
1

This was in response to something. It's also not a court. no one went to jail from them.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 04:45 PM
1

So there is a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 03:12 AM
0

I've never heard of this.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:18 AM
3

Then they can be sued, just like the rest of us. Congressman don't deserve anything special here.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:18 AM
1

Who is?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:11 AM
3

In Austin.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:57 PM
1

It is used by men too.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:54 PM
-1

No it doesn't. Don't upvote without actually reading.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:50 PM
2

Yes there is. My wife works for one.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:48 PM
1

And so friendly and reasonable! “Anyone that isn’t really like me, is a fascist! I’m off to check old Reddit threads for people that need abuse. Brb!”
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:10 PM
1

Sounds open-minded!
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:06 PM
1

Whoosh! Odd that two people respond to a four day old post of mine within hours of each other.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:36 PM
1

You didn’t understand what I said.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:30 PM
1

You don’t know how to see this from others perspectives. So you can’t see how it can mean anything other than your own uncharitable assessment. So this will go over your head, like a lot of other stuff, I imagine.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 09:08 PM
1

Will try and remember to do that.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:49 AM
2

Fair enough. Nice having a civil, thoughtful chat with you. I'll make that post after my finals and expect you to upvote it.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:08 AM
3

Gender-wise, I think there should be more promotion for male students who may be interested in female-dominated fields like elementary school teacher or nursing, but feel discouraged due to social stigma. Bingo. Totally agree here. I think we need to make school more hands on and out of your seat. We need more project-based learning. We need to raise teacher pay and show hiring preferences to male-teachers (this already happens, but not explicitly). We should consider paying them more. We need t…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:05 AM
1

Again, what is the charitable interpretation here? Is it that she means only women have a future? Or is it that she is rallying women who support her and see themselves as under attack from politicians like pussy-grabbing Trump and sexual assaulting Kavanaugh? Think about it and look at it from someone else's perspective.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:01 AM
1

I am very concerned about that kind of thing. I have been very explicit about using words like "likelihoods" that describe these generalities. I'm also arguing against someone elses generalities, which is going to change how its discussed.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:59 AM
4

Maids, nurses aids, and nannies are not on the level of transportation drivers, groundskeepers, roofers, HVAC techs, and industrial workers. They are paid less than those industries as well. Why did I pick those jobs for men to compare? Because they kill the most people per year. Women don't go to the dangerous, menial fields. You brought up menial jobs as a category. Women have historically been overrepresented in menial, lower paid jobs. Yes, men do more dangerous work. There is a phenomena wh…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:57 AM
0

Feminism on reddit is toxic as fuck, no question. And its toxic on twitter and in many liberal universities (most people aren't educated in these places though). I'm not questioning their existence. I'm questioning their power. Little dogs can be louder, but not much to worry about. Its important to look where the power actually lies.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:47 AM
0

I'm having polite conversations with grownups right now. You can do it to. You just have to be comfortable being challenged and making arguments, instead of hoping to bathe in upvotes in an echochamber.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:46 AM
2

I agree that there were efforts to do close the gender gap, as women weren't getting educated as much. But there are other variables at play since then, as the labor market has radically changed as well. That has to be driving this stuff. So does free trade, which ships male-dominated jobs overseas. Read some of the work of the economist Autor to see these changes.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:45 AM
1

Sorry to butt in, but where on earth did you get your "statistics" that men are more likely to be conservative/less likely to want custody and so on? Polling, voting patterns, etc. Look into it. More men are Republican. More more identify as conservative. Men are less likely to seek custody. Men are more likely to be the breadwinner. How don't you know this? I never said they were monolithic. But they are similar enough that it has effects in the data. Its not news to you that genders are biolog…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:43 AM
3

Men are willing to work the more menial jobs than women. Maids, nurses aids, nannies, and many other menial, female jobs would like a word with you. I don't think educational outcomes are occurring because of why you think they do. Its much more about how the labor market itself is changing through technology. I would read up on skill-biased technological change in economics for more information on this. That is the largest change in the world labor market. That's driving most of this.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:41 AM
3

But currently, men find it twice as hard as women to get into STEM focused schools like MIT or Caltech, and there is a 70/30 gender split at Google. That data isn't decomposed by major. MIT just achieved parity in mechanical engineering graduates by gender. They had to try to do so. I'm not commenting on whether or not they should try to do that (I suspect there are arguments both ways and haven't thought enough about it in this specific case), but if they have had to try and do it, that meant m…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:37 AM
2

Also I feel like u keep bringing up "men" as though it's a well interconnected group? Is the solution to the problem men or are there ideas held by individuals that should be challenged, because it sounds like you are just blaming the majority of a sex ( no offence) I'm mostly critiquing the notion that feminism is this huge threat to society that has turned us into some kind of gynocentric society. By and large, people are tribal and vote for their group. In the US, Democrats tend to do what mo…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:21 AM
1

I do agree that it is easier to classify me into a category that allows you to not be challenged than actually think about what someone says, even if its inaccurate. You are no different than the hardcore feminists you criticize and you don't even know it. Two sides of the same harmful coin. Funny how rude people are in this sub for the "sin" of simply disagreeing with them.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:22 AM
1

I think that is a cynical and unrealistic view that seeks to blame feminists, tbh. Even the word "gynocentrism" seems to focus only on what advantages women are perceived to have and are a frame that ignores any disadvantages that they have. I don't find it useful, as there are areas of society that advantage men and areas that advantage women. And there are difference both within and without of different societies.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:39 AM
3

I'm skeptical of this assessment. I think school has always gone against boys. I went to elementary school in the 70s and it was basically the same as it is now, as I'm getting my masters in education with an intent to work in elementary schools. There have been changes, but now particularly anti-boy. The system has always been set up to make kids sit in their chairs and listen for long periods of time, which is better for girls than boys. If anything, teaching is more engaging with an emphasis …
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:37 AM
1

These are laws passed both by men and with the support of men. Yes, feminists advocate for them. But you need to distinguish between who has the power to do such a thing and who is doing such a thing and who is simply advocating for such a thing. Men have a lot to answer for what they do to other men. And they have been doing since the dawn of time, well before feminism had a word to describe it.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:27 AM
1

Just because they "are men" doesn't mean that they are just going to pass laws that benefit all men. They are passing laws approved of by most men. Guilty until proven innocent in rape cases on college campuses sometimes to the point of absurdity where both people say it was consensual but a third party makes the claim and hence the man is still prosecuted Not all cases, not all campuses, and its not a court of law. If you are suspected of cheating, stealing, destroying property, or any other cr…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:03 AM
-5

Not a big one for politeness, huh? Hard pass.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:42 PM
-5

If you are criticizing it, tell me what your interpretation is.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:21 PM
0

Not really. It showed that certain gender studies journals would publish fake papers that seemed to follow certain passages of Mein Kampf that had lots of citations to other gender studies papers. If you actually read the papers, its hard to tell what they are even talking about and seem to be nearly gibberish. I didn't see anything in the paper that suggested all men should be killed or whatnot either. Are these "top journals" in gender studies? I have no idea. I haven't read a lot of gender st…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:58 PM
1

What is the cause and what is the solution to this?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:49 PM
2

Its silly to generalize based on this picture. Also...let's generalize based on this picture.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:48 PM
2

Nice to see a respectful back and forth. from other posts I have gathered that the sway they have in governmental institutions seems a problem to reaching equity from the male perspective (equal custody starting position etc.) I think that the effects of hardcore feminism are dramatically overblown outside of niche environments, like very liberal colleges on the coasts and other unusual places. I'm in graduate school in classes full of women, women of color, and almost no men. I don't feel all t…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:47 PM
-5

If you are going to complain about this, why don't you say what you think she means by this with a charitable interpretation. Otherwise you are no different than screeching feminists on twitter. "How dare Jordan Peterson try and help men. That means he doesn't want to help women. In fact, it means he hates them!"
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:26 PM
1

Biases do that. We all have them. This is just tailored to match some people's. In fairness, most people seem to realize its bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:09 PM
1

You can't know anything is fake, so you should be alarmed about everything omgwtfbbq the world is ending!!!
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:08 PM
2

I'm with you. It seems like a troll with an axe to grind. Anytime a post checks every box that triggers certain group's biases, be suspicious. This seems constructed to upset conservatives who favor gender norms. Its how some judgmental conservatives believe people that don't teach explicit gender constructs talk.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:07 PM
-1

Based on what?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:54 PM
18

This is a good thing. Society is moving towards this and it is clearly progress.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:46 PM
9

I only counted two examples. Why did that stand out to you?
/r/MensRights05/12/18 09:46 PM
1

You aren't an opponent. You are an idiot on reddit who doesn't really care about the topic, but just wants to make other people jump through hoops. So put on your big boy underwear and click a fucking link you already looked at. Or keep being a pussy that knows you are wrong and bury your head in the sand. Either way, I'm blocking your lazy ass so you stop clogging my inbox with your bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:26 PM
5

When activists don't understand the system they are criticizing.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 02:57 AM
1

So now you have to attack me too and not what I do or don’t know or my argument, which is that you don’t know enough to You are so blind to your own bullshit it’s practically a case study.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 12:09 AM
1

People can read what you wrote and see for themselves. You denigrated medical professionals and child psychologists generally with literally no specifics. You know little to nothing about these fields and use your accusations as a shield for your ignorance. And you are too cowardly to own up to what anyone can see that you did. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:10 PM
1

You are calling into question the character of like entire academic fields. Now you are projecting what you are doing when someone points out that you lack the knowledge to make these claims. You cannot know the bias or lack in entire fields without deep knowledge and systematic investigation of the research and the researchers. We both know you haven't done that. So to win your argument, you assassinate their character. That's lazy and frankly pathetic. Yes, we are done, because you don't have …
/r/MensRights01/12/18 08:07 PM
1

Stop pretending you are in the field and know what is happening "throughout academia". Your claim that they think it's a blank slate is counter to the idea that you should do anything medical, so it doesn't even made any sense. You don't know what you are talking about. You have an ideology that cannot function without other people being evil that you oppose. You don't know nor have talked to no doctors in this field, no people that are transgender, have never been to a conference, don't really …
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:26 PM
1

Is it fair to say that if you cannot demonize those that are part of this, your argument is much weaker? Your entire post here is demonizing child psychologists, academics, doctors, and parents that you think, without evidence, are making gay kids trans at some concernable rate. Its as if believing these massive groups you are painting with a broad brush cannot be good intentioned or you don't have a case. Otherwise, why do it? With all of this accusations of an axe to grind, you seem like someo…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:03 PM
1

It’s the first link you dishonest loser. What a narcissistic piece of garbage. Keep avoiding that info because you are a coward.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 01:05 PM
0

Just gave you the link. You didn't even click it, did you. Damn, can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 08:09 AM
1

This is definitely a problem with investigations. Feelings are substituted for knowledge. Cops go on their guts. Sex crimes is a very unique kind of investigative process. Victims are almost always traumatized in a way that other crime victims aren't. This leads to really counter-intuitive behavior. Police aren't trauma-informed because they lack the leadership and budgets to do it. And there just isn't much will to prosecute rape. Otherwise we wouldn't have nationwide backlogs for rape kits. Th…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:44 AM
1

I'll start by saying that you can find anecdotes to make any case you wish. I can come up with a long list of transgender suicides, where people are hopeless and discriminated against and kill themselves. These treatments and support without judgement can save lives. Yes, its important to gather data. Until then, its more important to listen to transgender people and medical professionals without a moral or religious axe to grind to evaluate this. Again, we can come up with anecdotes for anythin…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:23 AM
1

You are playing tennis without the net now. That's clearly a service that he offered for straight couples. He refused based on sexual orientation. You can try and talk around it, but that is the simple facts of the matter. If this was a dick cake or a swastika or someone taking a shit on the baby jesus, he doesn't have to do it because he doesn't do that for anyone. But he makes wedding cakes, so he should make them for gay people too. And there is literally nothing in the bible that says you ca…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:22 PM
1

If you are concerned about this problem, then start advocating for the full and proper investigation of sexual assault allegations. There is recent reporting that makes clear that this isn't happening in the US in basically any major city. My partner is in sex crimes investigations and rural areas are even worse than urban areas the reporters looked at. She has an insider view of a top 15 city and knows that it isn't happening here. The longest sex crimes detective on staff is less than three ye…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:14 PM
1

He denies a service based on sexual orientation. That's discrimination. It doesn't even conflict with his religion. It conflicts with his bigotry against gays.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 09:40 PM
1

Making people serve the people with equal access isn’t discrimination. Keep defending bigotry though.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:56 PM
1

You d don’t even understand the research and are making claims about my thinking backed by data? Lol. Whatever dude. Enjoy your biases.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:54 PM
1

Read the study that deals with that before you start acting like what I’m says no is immature or whatever. The try and knock that down. It’s pretty hard because of how smart the research is and what it looked at to try and tease the causes out.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:54 PM
1

You just don’t understand the research. That’s fine and there is nothing no wrong with that, but that doesn’t change the research of one of the world’s top economists. You need to learn what phrases like “conditional on family income” mean. Understanding that makes it clear how those statements aren’t contradictory. The research finds that black men coming from identical neighborhoods with parents that are identical in income and education (conditional on family income and education) achieve at …
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:05 PM
1

And southerners were sad to have to serve blacks. Boo fucking hoo. It’s not an argument for allowing discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:54 PM
1

Naziism isn’t a sexual orientation. And they didn’t ask for a swastika. It’s a wedding cake whose only differential was the customers sexual orientation. You know that’s true.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:11 PM
1

At discrimination based on sexual orientation, race, religion, etc. This wasn’t because of the cake. This was because of the customer’s sexual orientation. Could he refuse to make a cake for a Muslim wedding? No.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:03 PM
1

Putting an extra groom on a cake instead of a bride or whatever isn’t a big deal. He wasn’t asked to draw a dick in someone’s mouth.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:59 PM
1

Again, shouldn’t this depend on the data? My wife has spoken to doctors that do this sort of thing and it has nearly 100% satisfaction rates so far. That seems more important than the issues you raised. What evidence do you have of parents persuading kids into this that don’t want it?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:55 PM
1

That’s a wedding theme.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:25 PM
1

So when men’s rights activists focus on false accusations and pretend that it’s an important issue affecting men, you have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:24 PM
0

You have spent more time refusing to look at what has been provided than it would take to perform a simple search. We are talking about less than thirty second search here. Think about how stupid this is. Anyone normal reading this can see you desperately and pathetically refusing to look at evidence to cling to your sad little ego and protect your fragile little self-esteem. What a fucking baby.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:22 PM
1

What is a “gay theme”?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:13 PM
1

This is simply not true. Your reaction to this information will be telling, right? You should be outraged and admit that you are wrong. To quote someone you trust: Your reaction to actual discrimination when it is found is pathetic. We should all be disgusted by ANY and ALL discrimination. What kind of pathetic person first needs to justify these sorts of practices to push their own agenda. If you cant see your own red flags you have no hope.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:08 PM
1

What if the satisfaction rate among kids that goes through this is measurable higher than those that don’t? That should decide it, right? If you are worried about targets in backs, you are worried about quality of life.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:09 AM
1

Christ dude. It’s absurd to suggest that Christians are oppressed. How many people in power are Christians? Virtually all of them? Clearly in danger of being wiped out.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:07 AM
0

Have you performed a google search? We know the answer.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:31 AM
1

I could do something I’m not, so that’s bad somehow. Okay.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:31 AM
0

Help, help, Christians are being oppressed!
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:51 AM
0

How much have you seen? This isn't forensics, but the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion. You asserted they were all a bunch of biased, unethical feminists. Now you can't produce a single name and why they fit that description. And you have sudden amnesia that I haven't already told you where to find the reporting that examine 70,000 sexual assault in the top one hundred most populous cities and found exceptional clearance overutilized throughout the country. And I'm confident…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:48 AM
0

without the country going to war with you and your cake shop That's an odd way to say "calling out bigotry".
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:44 AM
0

Lots of white men get scholarships.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:43 AM
0

Name all of these researchers. You must know them all to be able to say that with such certainty. I'm referring to journalists with propublica and reveal. Of course you already know they are feminists, because that allows you to never even bother looking into what I'm talking about. That way you can just dismiss it and not have your beliefs challenged. Not unusual for around here.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:32 AM
1

You believe that rape is properly prosecuted? There is some pretty good reporting coming out in the last few weeks that make it very clear that's not the case. Most cases that are cleared are done so with the police stating there is enough evidence to make an arrest, but they don't. Hard to argue when that's the status quo.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:34 AM
2

That doesn't change the standard for kicking a student out. If you are accused of cheating, stealing, or destroying school property, the same standard will apply.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:01 AM
2

Claiming harassment over a Reddit disagreement is pretty delicate brah.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 12:37 AM
0

It's not really a contest, sparky. As a narcissist, you will discover, but not have the self-awareness to know, that people don't really care about your "rebukes" on the internet. They won't care if you are sad that they won't spend a half hour of their time doing legwork for someone like you, someone that is clearly a waste of time. You will pat yourself on the back and go away feeling like you did something, when you just look like an asshole and proved their point. Have a nice day. :)
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:50 PM
-1

Getting angry and being rude because someone won’t stop what they are doing to spend their free time looking for shit you can look up yourself. Not narcissistic at all! At this point I don’t have to really do much more to prove my point that people that post here act like how I say they do. I just point at you. Case in point.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:42 PM
-1

I've had many conversations where women have only had privilege for the entirety of civilization. That's not an exaggeration. These comments receive their share of upvotes as well. If you don't see that, I don't think you are looking, tbh. All of what you are asking citations for are equally obvious to anyone that isn't already wanting to agree with you. I can't help it if you don't see it. And look at the way you are responding here. You turned angry and rude over what exactly? You are precisel…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:17 PM
-5

Or perhaps you can communicate more clearly and be less rude about the whole thing. Big lift, apparently.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:13 PM
-2

Calling a Jew a nazi while pretending to criticize racism. Whew doggy that’s rich.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:29 PM
2

He literally provided information that you are ignoring. Poor little baby feeling harassed by information. Boohoo, poor little snowflake.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:28 PM
1

Try reading what I’m saying and get back to me. You’ve presented like three bullshit straw men. That’s not easy. And maybe look at the research you are still refusing to read. You aren’t confident in your beliefs if you won’t expose them to simple information.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:26 PM
0

Look at the way it’s written. And I know for a fact that no one is getting chemically castrates. That’s just a lie. People need to understand bullshit, sensationalist activist writing when they read it. Look for journalism. This isn’t it.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:24 PM
-2

So you didn't read the research. And now you are accusing me of not reading what you are posting, when you haven't read the research you are accusing of "being pc". Even your generic criticism is bad econometrics.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 08:23 PM
-4

The problem is multi-faceted. First, this is an advocacy sub. Advocacy groups attract people that are angry and often just engaging in identity politics. There is a lot of angry and hateful comments that are highly upvoted. There is a complete dismissal of any kind of structural disadvantage that women have faced at any point in history. Any problem thought to face men seems reflexively blamed on "feminism", which as you point out is ill-defined. Even in cases where men clearly wield the power, …
/r/MensRights28/11/18 08:02 PM
-1

So we can assume the same about you being here then, right? Or is it only people that disagree with you that are bad people.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:53 PM
2

I think there is some truth here, although a suggestion that we use a legal standard can be argued to be a needlessly high standard. There aren't the resources to meet that standard and its not one that is used in similar environments anywhere in our society. If you are accused of stealing or sexually harassing in a company, they will fire you without meeting some kind of beyond a reasonable doubt standard. They won't even use a preponderance of the evidence standard. They will just fire you. Th…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:50 PM
1

This isn't the legal system.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:41 PM
-1

What do you find problematic about the methodology? You don't know the methodology, do you. And yet you accuse the researcher of bias. That's funny.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:40 PM
1

Nobody is operating on a child. You have to be an adult for that. They can administer medication to delay puberty to wait for more adult consent at a later point. And why are you accepting the article at face value? They are garbage.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:33 PM
-4

Why are you taking this garbage source at face value?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:32 PM
-2

Yawn.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:30 PM
0

A better question is, "What do we do with children who are continuously and clearly experiencing life as a different gender than they were declared at birth? What is best for that child?"
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:30 PM
1

Why don't you go look for them.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:29 PM
3

You've provided nothing, so by your own advice, shut the fuck up until you do. :)
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:28 PM
2

This is spot on. A doctor isn't going to delay puberty without the child's overt and continuous consent and enthusiasm. Period. Funny how the rights of the father are paramount, but the rights of the boy to be happy with his gender aren't. What kind of bias is that?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:27 PM
2

This sources is trash. Fakerfact AI rates this story as sensational and opinion, not news. The language used and the framing isn't remotely journalistic. Why are you accepting any of this at face value?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:25 PM
2

You seem to be the one that has a bias affecting your analysis here. This story is complete garbage and is clearly written as advocacy and not news.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:24 PM
-2

The good news is that this is what is happening, except a lot more than 10 rapists and molesters go free for every innocent that is charged. If we really care about this, we should all be calling for sex crimes police to have far greater staffing and funding to be able to full investigate allegations and either charge the accuser (if they are actually naming someone, which they usually don't in false accusations) or charge the suspect.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:52 PM
0

That was a survey showing the prevailing opinions of "feminism"?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:49 PM
1

Most people that leave their jobs under most circumstances aren't homeless. The average time of unemployment for most people is quite brief. I wouldn't stay at a job where I was being harassed though. I'd bounce. I'd line something up first, but I'd leave. I've left jobs before that way, although not for harassment.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:29 AM
1

Then you will have a tough set of decisions. Leaving is probably the best options. If it's bad enough, you can sue. I wouldn't stay if it was my boss and there was no HR though.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:50 PM
1

I don't understand the question. Isn't the norm for what?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 10:48 PM
1

I think we mostly know how to solve this problem. Companies just need to do it. I’m not saying that this one is fabricated, although there have been obvious fabrications on this and other subs. I’m says no the pattern is to take an anecdote and pretend it’s what happens everywhere. There is also a near refusal to blame men for any of this. Take the stress OP story. Reading the article, it seems that men were most of the problem after the initial act by a female supervisor. He was bully ed for th…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 09:51 PM
2

I don’t think ignoring it is useful. I agree it should be addressed. I would suggest that in larger companies, HR will almost always act on a complaint. Smaller companies are usually more problematic, as they might not even have and HR. Or it’s the boss, who might be doing the harassment. Do you think we should give multiple accusations more weight?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 09:43 PM
0

I think that’s a great way. Bear in mind I never said it didn’t happen. I’m reacting to the thread seemingly believing this is a huge problem confronting men. It’s not. Men have a different experience of this stuff in many ways. If we want to talk about how to solve these problems, let’s do that. I have asked three people what they see as solutions. Nothing ends the conversation faster because I don’t think people really want to solve this. They want to foster a persecution complex. Prove me wro…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 08:48 PM
0

I’m a humanist. Why do you try and turn this into identity politics?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 08:16 PM
-8

Ever thought I’m not? How do you think we should determine this in a non-biased way?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 08:16 PM
-1

And what is the solution to these workplace problems?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 08:14 PM
-9

So what is the solution to these kinds of problems? What kind of framework should be in place to prevent this? Assuming this happened between the two of them, should he simply be believed? This is a workplace full of cops, who are very unlikely to be feminists. It certainly isn't a culture dominated by feminism. In fact, this seems like men bullying a man for being weak. How do we deal with that culture to prevent this kind of harassment of a man for being perceived as weak?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:21 PM
-1

I think this can be also be a gender difference. The same stimulus can lead to different feelings of safety/danger, depending on whether someone is male or female. Women receive just as much, if not more, harassment from other women in the workplace as they do from men. They don't feel unsafe from the female harassment the way they do from the male harassment, particularly sexual harassment. I would feel much worse if I was publicly humiliated than receiving unwanted sexual advances from women i…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:15 PM
-6

It might. I'm conventionally attractive and am fairly "alpha". I think a lot of it depends on the culture that comes from leadership and who they hire. Men's right's activists and feminists need to both understand that gender isn't the only nor the most important variable in workplace harassment.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:00 PM
-25

This thread is full of hyperbolic claims that try and make these outlier events the norm. It isn't. It's worth pointing that out.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:55 PM
-30

I've worked in mostly female environments all my life. This has never happened to me. I'm male.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:59 PM
1

You aren't really capable of having a civil conversation that is intellectually honest. Too bad, it started well. Have a nice evening.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 12:30 AM
1

Repeating "its a logical fallacy" isn't saying anything so there is literally nothing to respond to. They are doing what most men want them to do. Period. You can either respond to that or not. It's obvious you're pretty partisan here and you want to believe Democrats good, everyone else bad. I have plenty of problems with Democrats. That's called a straw man and is an actual fallacy. So you've discovered one at last! You asked what policies favor men over women. Abortion is one of those policie…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:35 PM
1

I think you are conflating different issues here. There is a difference between doing what someone wants and doing what you believe is good for them. Republican voters are mostly men and agree with what Republicans do. Whether you view that as "men's rights" because of how you evaluate the policy isn't material when talking about whose bidding is being done. You might think that Democrats aren't actually helping women or black folks, but that's their base. That's who puts them in power. That is …
/r/MensRights25/11/18 10:00 PM
1

We are talking past each other. I think we actually agree that men's rights issues should be something that is legislated. There are government solutions here. The overlap between men's rights and libertarianism is substantial though. Many men don't want government intervention out of some kind of principle. You can see it in this sub. They don't want a special program for men as much as end any special anything for women. It's practically a meme. I would agree that Republicans aren't actually h…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 07:32 PM
0

Republicans are the party for men, obviously. They certainly aren't feminists and they are out of step with feminist concerns of the mainstream. You have to very narrowly define it to make them not an MRA-friendly party. And you're going with Trump and Kavanaugh. Two of the most powerful American politicians are completely repulsive to mainstream feminism. Of course that's important. He's the pussy-grabbing appointer of a serial, sexual-assaulter to feminists. The problem with your standard is t…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 02:56 AM
1

MRAs dominate the US government right now without question. It’s obvious. Look at Trump and Kavanaugh. These are feminist candidates or candidates supported by feminists. They are the exact opposite. When you blame women for men’s behavior while these men are in power, you are just trying to find a way to blame women. It sounds a lot like gaslighting, tbh.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:53 PM
1

Lawmakers are men. So they have passed the laws and they can change it with new laws or repeals. They make up most of these judges that prefer women in divorce courts, most of the judges that give longer sentences to men, most of the police that supposedly believe every rape accusation. Blaming feminists for that is like blaming the backseat driver for where the driver goes. Men have the power, by and large. These problems, to the extent they exist, are our doing and our ability and responsibili…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:51 PM
1

I don't think coaching/encouraging the individual man to be less isolated and talk about their problems is the key issue at all. That's where you may have bought a harmful message. That puts the blame while on that particular man, which is an unconscious bias we all have. It puts the blame on the environment. It's not seeking to blame a group or individual, but describe a problem. Men are going to be the key to solving our problems. We are going to have to change the society and our own environm…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:54 PM
1

It is also important to realise that a high proportion of mental health issues arise from the man's situation. Fixing or supporting a change in those situations is a key way to avoid male suicide. I agree. I don't think that feminists are doing anything to cause or maintain this. We are doing this to ourselves. And part of the solution is going to feel "gynocentric" to a lot of MRA types. Men need to be less isolated so we can have camaraderie and actually talk about our problems.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:34 PM
1

I just think men are that bit more pragmatic You are ascribing a conscious process to one that is unconscious. There is a lot of evidence that men are lonely. We have isolated themselves in a way we have never done before. Social media, video games, moving for a job, etc, have all conspired to rob us of our face-to-face friendships. Thinking that men also need to be around people and socialize isn't "gynocentric". Its reality. We are social apes. We need one another and some of it is being able …
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:22 PM
1

A man kills himself, he must have had a mental health issue. Then it must have been his toxic masculinity that did it. Which was caused by patriarchy. I don't think that's how it works at all. Most people just think someone must be mentally ill to kill themselves, because they wouldn't consider it in their own darkest times. That's the simple explanation. I've literally never heard someone jump to patriarchy and toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:15 PM
-1

Where I think this sub has still got a blind spot is we rarely are arguing for specific support service for men. As long as this sub's focus is on demonizing women and feminists by posting anecdotes, its not accomplishing anything. Its actually harmful. Much of what fucks men over is foisted on us by other men. Feminists still have far less power than men do. That's the seat of power right now. That's the power to change it.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 06:12 PM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:38 PM
0

If it’s something important. This isn’t. No one is even a victim here, best I can tell. It’s an article where the magazine reports the woman wasn’t even taken seriously. The biggest problem with this sub is it’s obsessive focus on shit that doesn’t really affect men. For example, men are wildly underrepresented in college. This goes mostly ignored except to complain about elementary school teachers not liking boys, which clearly isn’t responsible for this. Is this sub actually about helping men?
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:37 PM
-1

Which is totally the same as telling me I can't talk about something, right guys? Help, I'm being oppressed! Saying we should focus on more important problems than this is exactly what it is. That you changed what I said to argue it shows you know this. Now doesn't it.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:23 PM
-1

More victimization fetish. “There are actual problems to discuss” is actually “I’m being told what I can discuss waaaahhh.”
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:14 PM
-1

This is the top link on a Men's Rights forum. Is this some systemic oppression of men? Did this have a terrible effect on someone? No. This is literally an example of this sub engaging in victim fetishization. It's a stupid mom describing a non-existent policy. If it was an actual policy and this policy was getting more common, complain away. But if this is the biggest kind of problem we men face (it isn't), then we have no problems (we do). Maybe we should focus on them.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 07:49 PM
1

I think that's fine. Your comment was fairly vague and wanted to make sure no one was advocating for sexual assault here.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:55 PM
8

The conversation must be had ahead of time though. You can't just start fucking your girl when she's asleep because she fucks you when she's awake. Can you elaborate on your statement? What kinds of things require consent when hooking up but don't when in a relationship?
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:40 PM
2

Nice broad brush, brah.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:18 PM
-1

Depends on what is meant by that. Is consent assumed when they are passed out because you are in a relationship? No.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:18 PM
7

Public opinion would think it was rape if it was someone you didn't want to have sex with, but were coerced into it with alcohol.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:16 PM
2

Where does it say that?
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:15 PM
1

You realize the first sentence you just restated what I already said, right? I’d like a neutral source on the claim that men can’t be discriminated against. There is no reason for your uncharitable attitude towards me. I am simply skeptical of claims, particularly ones made by activists. And you should be too.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:55 PM
2

If she is lying, why put two people in the room? That makes no sense. If Kavanaugh is innocent, why hem and haw about investigating and clearing his name? That makes no sense. Why lie about his yearbook, his drinking, how close he lived to the party? That makes no sense. He plainly and repeatedly lied. But keep on pretending it’s only a partisan issue for everyone but you.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:52 PM
0

That's so political.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 12:11 PM
2

That's insanely political in tone. Jesus.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:47 AM
-4

Yawn. More brainless partisanship. “How dare you inject partisanship by recognizing partisan behavior! Next, we claim calling our racism or sexism is actually racist and sexist!!”
/r/MensRights26/10/18 02:43 AM
2

For what crimes?
/r/MensRights26/10/18 02:41 AM
-3

Boring when it’s your tram. Outrageous when it isn’t. This is what is wrong with our politics in a nutshell. Has this woman retracted? Has there been an investigation? Nope, because “innocent” Kavanaugh inexplicably didn’t want to prove his innocence. But somehow that’s a referral. It’s a joke and you are the butt of it.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:34 AM
1

Literally what I addressed. Want it avoid accusations? Step one is don’t rape.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:30 AM
2

No clue what decisively proven means, but the second sentence couldn’t be more wrong. It takes very strong evidence to convict someone of rape.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:12 PM
1

How are you measuring this?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:06 PM
-3

Kavanaugh made false statements under oath and dissembled his ass off.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:04 PM
4

For what and by whom?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:03 PM
-1

If both genders are similarly underrepresented, the relative difference between genders will remain the same.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:02 PM
1

There are 90k rapes reported to law enforcement every year, the vast majority of which are true (the highest study with a good methodology is 11%). Of the false ones, the vast majority are from homeless or otherwise mentally ill, unnamed, or parents of children. So if you have consensual sex with a woman, your chances of being falsely accused are tiny. You are more likely to be murdered, killed in a car wreck, die of a disease, or any number of horrible things happen to you. So it is absolutely …
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:00 PM
1

Black men have nearly no chance in the US. Plummeting college rates for men. Please don’t include false rape stuff. It will destroy your credibility.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 09:40 PM
1

Imagine actually having this kind of victim complex. Sound like a hardcore feminist.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 06:39 PM
2

Seems like you just have an amputation fetish. That's assuming an extremely unchartible position of someone that hasn't taken a position. At least be honest about it. Jesus dude. I can read.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:27 PM
1

So this is conflict theory in action. I have literally not advocated for a policy at any point in this discussion. Not a single time. All I have said is that it is unlikely the CDC is involved in some anti-male conspiracy. I have also questioned the methods people are using to try and decide the policy. They pretend they know the literature and boil it down to three studies, when its more than that. They pretend that its simply about HIV, when its more than that. That's it. If you are going to c…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:03 PM
1

They do recommend it.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:17 PM
1

Some discrimination against males is unacceptable. Some discrimination against females is acceptable. Read it. Don’t you think it’s important to be accurate and not misleading? We aren’t feelz before realz around here, are we?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:15 PM
3

I’m not having an argument. Maybe that is your problem. If you seek to discuss rather than engage in conflict, it is far more useful. It helps you avoid mistakes like telling someone they believe something that they don’t and being more receptive to new information. In your case, you should understand that a variable need not be the most important independent variable to be worth designing policy around. For instance, seat belts aren’t the most important variable for driving safety. That doesn’t…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:28 PM
3

I'm not sure you realize it, but you don't really come off as someone that is thoughtful and composed.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 04:35 PM
2

Dang dude you need to take a statistics and public health class.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:37 AM
1

This is the correct analysis.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:25 AM
2

even if there is just a correlation it shows that you CAN be circumcised and STILL have a higher chance of getting HIV than other people. Who was assuming circumcision was the most important variable in HIV risk?
/r/MensRights22/10/18 06:25 AM
1

Just find a kid and give it to him now. If you get enough for another one, do it again. Men are underrepresented in college. It’s a big problem.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:17 AM
2

That’s not true. It’s written gender neutral. There are exceptions for amelioration that will allow discrimination in favor of disadvantaged groups.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:16 AM
1

How long did you spend investigating those links? Can you honestly say that you know enough to intelligently describe what is in them? You can’t and we both know it. No scientist would make the claim you are making and they actually perform research. They wouldn’t look at a list and just dismiss it and pretend they know what must be in it.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:30 PM
1

You have an identification problem. You aren’t drawing a conclusions that is reliable. Do you know what I mean when I say that?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:27 PM
1

And men take great pride in working hard. It’s a well-known and well-studied phenomenon. I haven’t seen data suggesting women have more free time. I’d be interested in that. Not that it matters because American men work too much as it is and it affects their health and probably their happiness. Good luck getting them to stop though. As a general rule, you shouldn’t think you are getting good economics by reading mainstream press. They can engage in bad econometrics. The article you cite is writt…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:48 PM
1

I found my beliefs on research. I don't put my beliefs on research I haven't read.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:24 PM
1

When the evidence is that societies in which circumcision is the normal practice have lower rates of HIV than others, I might believe there is some value in it. That's not how science works.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:23 PM
1

Tell me about the literature review on the subject. Its pretty extensive.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:21 PM
1

It might! But if you actually read it, you might do more than make up speculation. Try learning something that might disagree with your prior beliefs sometime. Builds character.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:19 AM
1

Past idiocy isn't science. You didn't read the study cited, obviously.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:56 AM
1

If you can’t understand it and make up wild stories to facilitate your anger, that’s on you. Not my circus, not my monkeys.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:44 AM
0

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:33 AM
1

Feel free to to quote where I took a position other than the CDC isn’t engaged in a conspiracy theory to export bullshit or whatever. You’d rather argue that though, I agree. It’s much easier. And you did the exact same thing to me. Rather than take on what was actually said, you took the least charitable interpretation. That’s on you bud.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:30 AM
3

Not quite a rape kit, but I get your point. Now I’m wondering why they would collect that evidence unless you told them you didn’t have any sexual contact. Sounds like smarmy small town bullshit to me. Surprised the girl was even prosecuted, given her family’s connections.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:27 AM
6

They are. He’s describing evidence collection, which is somewhat different, despite many similarities. Rape kits are performed by medical personnel.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:24 AM
1

You didn’t read it. You just came up with a narrative that fits your biases.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:22 AM
1

It is a direct response, you just don't know enough about its application in science to understand that. :)
/r/MensRights20/10/18 11:08 PM
5

That sounds terrible. Were they well-connected? Was this a race thing? Who performed a rape kit on the suspect? That's really unusual.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 11:04 PM
0

Circumcision is a value judgment, to be sure. I wouldn't personally circumcise my kid, if I had a boy. But I'm saying that its not some conspiracy by the CDC to "export bullshit" to Africa. They are in the business of saving lives and to cast those kinds of ignorant aspersions isn't helpful. Its just brainless activism.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 11:02 PM
0

It doesn't take 61 pages of a lit review to go over three studies. Maybe you should read it first. This section describes the evidence base about the biological plausibility; results of randomized clinical trials and observational studies, including meta-analyses; on the effect of male circumcision on acquisition of HIV and STIs. It also describes study results about the frequency of penile and prostate cancers among circumcised men, cervical cancer in female partners of circumcised men, urinary…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 11:00 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endogeneity_(econometrics)
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:54 PM
0

This will be my last comment, but you don't really understand how science works. A 61 page lit review is far more persuasive than "europe which doesn't circumcise and has less STDs than the US or other cutting countries." There is nothing I can say to someone that doesn't understand science. You will either go learn or you won't, but I'm not going to be able to convince you in a reddit post.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:18 PM
1

It is.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:09 PM
3

No problem. Most people don't. Sex crimes also has the most junior investigators, as most investigators only do it for a year or two and seek "sexier" detective jobs on the force. So the already underfunded investigations are usually poorly executed.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:08 PM
1

USA has highest HIV and circumcision rate. We don't have remotely the highest HIV rate.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:07 PM
2

The CDC is using a 61 page literature review to determine this. Its clearly not just one study.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:06 PM
-3

You are taking the least charitable position towards what they are doing. I'm not weighing on this one way or another, but you are so angry that you can't even analyze this clearly. Circumcision is shown by research to reduce HIV transmission to men through their penis. That's clearly the purpose of the policy and not "Just the US pushing shit on the 3rd world so it can keep promoting it in the 1st world too." The CDC supported the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) infant MC policy4,5 (B…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 10:04 PM
-2

Then we need to advocate for larger sex crimes budgets (and prosecutors) to actually investigate claims and determine whether its false or not. The notion that we just make it harder to prosecute rape in the current system, which is wholly inadequate, is backassward. You want people to go to jail for false accusations? Then you need to put in place investigations that both send more rapists to jail and put more false accusers in jail. Tbh, this never gets advocated around here.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:58 PM
4

Proving claims beyond a reasonable doubt isn't stacked against the accused.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:55 PM
1

Can you tell us more about this?
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:53 PM
12

I'll answer this. We can fully investigate claims, which aren't happening and sex crimes doesn't have the resources to do it even if they wanted to. If someone makes a rape accusation, then the accusation should be fully investigated. This will go towards reducing both false accusations and rape of both men and women. The same incentives are at play in both cases. If people know there won't be a full investigation, then they will be incentivized to come forward with true accusations and keep the…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:52 PM
25

The average man is just another utility for women people to use. Its not limited to women. Powerful men are some of the biggest beneficiaries of male disposability. In fact, it wouldn't exist without them.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:44 PM
1

You cannot simply make up a story where societal pressure is only a problem in the male labor market. But if you really believe that people make choices influenced by biases, traditional gender roles, then you must believe the it has a non-trivial effect on the pay gap. Right?
/r/MensRights19/10/18 01:01 PM
1

You aren’t giving a nuanced view. You are giving an ideological view of anything a man does they are forced into and bad, but anything a woman does it is freely chosen and her fault: that’s the opposite of nuance.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:13 PM
1

So when women take certain jobs, it’s their choice and we shouldn’t care about pay. But when men take pride in manly jobs and work those jobs willingly, they have no agency and only do it for society. Whew boy.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 09:08 AM
1

Men take pride in serving during war and doing hard jobs. Men unable to serve in WWII were humiliated and many killed themselves. Much if what’s driving Trump is the elimination of hard jobs that gave poorer men status and income. If you can’t acknowledge these obvious and well-known facts, you are choosing cherry-picked, ideological delusion.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:22 PM
1

Wow. You have no clue how to analyze this. Fucking marxism lol.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 06:14 PM
1

Look at a narcissist checklist.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 02:36 AM
2

You wouldn't consider it power if you had to convince someone else to give you basic rights. If they didn't like not laying paving slabs and mining coal, they would have said by now. Look at the psychology of dangerous jobs and the status it incurs to the men that do it. Given that men aren't forced to do such jobs and take pride in it, it's ridiculous to say that they are being taken advantage of. They choose these jobs. If a modern woman decides to stay at home and take care of the kids, I don…
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:29 PM
6

Do you know who forced through prohibition? Women tired of being abused by their drunk husbands and no real way to make a living outside of marriage. America has a long history of alcoholism that began with the advent of whiskey. This destroyed families, battered wives, and led to derelict men that, when they weren't losing their livelihoods through drunkenness, were beating their wives into submission. It isn't the story of female privilege gone awry. Its the story of a misguided attempt to sto…
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:14 PM
5

So stripped me women of rights is really their privilege. But choosing to have only men fight wars is also their privilege. See guys? Everything we choose for them is always their privilege! You just compared women to children and generalized about all of them. You are probably confused when someone calls you a misogynist.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 05:02 PM
2

Nah, she's character disordered and those are the most likely pair.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 07:23 AM
1

There is a lot of whining about feminism causing problems for men, when the reality is that its men doing it to men.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:37 PM
2

I wouldn’t trust her for accuracy either. She’s at least a narcissist if not a sociopath.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:57 PM
0

Clearly male judges have been secret feminists for centuries.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:55 PM
5

And you believe those men had no benefit or desire to work to support their wives? Who do you think had the power to institutionalize this arrangement? It was men. Or do you think that feminism has been a force throughout the globe to institute similar arrangements? Of course not. Think it through and do more than blame women and pretend they have been running the show.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 12:12 PM
-2

They weren’t partners.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:00 AM
-9

Women didn’t do this. A male judge did.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:55 AM
1

As if men don’t have agency and can’t choose other, safer jobs like the vast majority of men choose. Stop pretending men are a bunch of victims. I refuse to be some helpless loser. It’s pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:47 AM
6

It never ceases to amaze me how stripping most women of much of their freedom and agency can be seen as favoring that gender. And then you blame feminists that didn’t much exist and certainly didn’t have power for what men did to other men. It’s okay to admit that men had the power and made some crappy decisions. We are apes.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:44 AM
1

We live in an unprecedented "age of information," but we use very little of it. Dieters prefer not to look at the calories in their tasty dessert, people at high risk for disease avoid screenings and people choose the news source that aligns with their political ideology. Science, bitches.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:57 PM
0

Yawn. My lack of outrage is actually outrage and you are outraged. Focusing on this bullshit hides actual men’s rights issues. Maybe don’t do it.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:15 AM
1

Comfort to extremists everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:07 AM
4

Welcome to the radical center. People that can think and don’t fall for fake conflict.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:38 PM
-2

Be polite and share seats is now punishing men for their genitals. Persecution complex much? Jesus.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:37 PM
1

There is victimhood culture in this very thread.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 06:00 PM
3

I've never heard of any of my friends or acquaintances having this happening to them. Seems to me its pretty out of the norm. If you have some data that would paint a different picture, I'm open to being wrong.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:54 PM
12

Got a link for the list of 14? That sounds awful.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:52 PM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:13 PM
1

Oh look. You used a big boy word and called someone a name! Good boy! Good little activist, that's right. Good job buddy!
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:11 AM
1

If you think the norm is a belief in gynocentrism, a made up MRA word, you are delusional. You have no idea what views I have. But feel free to continue to make up a reality that keeps the feelz like want them.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:51 AM
-5

My post history makes it clear that you are completely wrong about that. What I won't do is engage what is basically an evidence free gish gallop from an uninformed activist that has beliefs so outside the norm they are probably unreachable. But whatever story makes you feel better kid. Go with that.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:38 AM
-10

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:37 PM
0

What argument?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:37 PM
-15

Lots of unsupported assertions. I’m guessing you don’t actually know much about rape research. In fact I’d put a months salary in it for even odds.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:49 PM
1

When you question what someone knows to be true with a high degree of certainty, especially about their own behavior, that's textbook gaslighting. But this is easier than responding to the substance of what I said, which you are both seemingly unable to do.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:48 PM
1

Says the guy gaslighting instead of responding to the substance of what I said.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:28 PM
0

Now you are simply exaggerating. "Maybe" and "exactly the kind of statement" to explain "maybe" aren't strong implications. And you are talking to the person that said it and knows what they meant. I'm sure I know better than you what I meant. But its easier than responding to the substance of what I said.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:19 PM
1

Fair enough. Sorry I misconstrued.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:10 PM
-9

I do agree that its easier than responding to the substance of what I said. Congrats on the dodge.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:02 PM
1

They are different categories within a question that aren't necessarily compatible. You could just as easily turn it around and combine minor problem and not a problem and claim "a majority doesn't really think its a concern". So yes, people think it happens. Of course it happens. But the vast majority of the time the claim is true and pretty much every research into false claims backs that view. And a majority of people think its not much of a concern.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:50 PM
-9

Think it over. If someone is a predator, that's exactly the kind of statement they would make. I literally said I didn't know and I didn't accuse. But you are pretending I did. I guess its easier to complain about this than respond to what I said.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:44 PM
38

Nope. Metoo is only in the title. It also isn't even helpful to the narrative being pushed. A plurality (exactly half) of people believe men are getting away with harassment and its a major problem and women not being believed is a major problem. And a plurality believe that men being fired and women making false claims are a minor problem. Its the opposite of what is being presented. It does present a divided country on these issues, however.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:39 PM
-7

What we're heading to is that in that situation, without a verbal consent, you're sexually assaulting her if she changes her mind or whatever. No, we aren't. But you have to believe that to be as concerned as you are, because the current situation is record numbers of men and women working together just fine. But that's not the sky falling, now is it. If the body language indicating enthusiasm and consent is there, most people don't think its a problem, including most of the women supporting met…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:34 PM
-6

That's pretty terrible analysis. You are combining two things that are occupying different polls. "Fuck yeah. Bitches be making shit up about men in the workplace!" That's a major problem belief. "Yeah, it occasionally happens, but its not a big deal." Minor problem belief. Pretty sad when you look at the whole data set, which is counter to the narrative being pushed here.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:15 PM
42

Its not. Here is the research.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:13 PM
9

Where is the 75% claim coming from? Pretty much the entire rest of the data set goes against OP's narrative.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:12 PM
1

I find this claim dubious and completely antithetical to everyone I’ve ever heard give their experience with this.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 07:23 PM
1

Men’s rooms are far grosser in my experience. Ask a women, who will occasionally use men’s rooms when the women’s is unavailable. I was just in Canada and literally texted my wife because the men’s room seat was both raised and not the peed on, a rarity in my experience.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 07:21 PM
1

In what ways are women disadvantaged in a typical divorce? There always tradeoffs. What are they? If you can’t answer this, you aren’t thinking it through.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 04:59 PM
1

I don’t think they are screwed by marriage. I don’t think women have more power.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:46 PM
2

This post is bullshit spoon feeding to biases.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:45 AM
1

Cherry-picking this or that guy is ridiculous. It literally means nothing. If I come up with a women that is raped, does that convince you that rape is everywhere and dangerous and women would be wise to completely stay away from men? You need to learn how to turn it around and put it in a different situation to check how reasonable you are being. Pull the camera back and take off your activist hat off and actually analyze the world. Let me ask you a question. How have you been personally harmed…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:29 AM
-2

I’m interested in actual threats to men and not fantasies of feminist domination or whatever.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:27 AM
-1

That’s not correct. They believe that sexism affects the labor market. That’s a straw man.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:33 PM
-1

Very few people think they are just the same. That’s a bit of a straw man.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:26 PM
4

Then few women should be on the front lines. Or change the standards for everyone. Edit: downvotes for suggesting men and women be treated equally. Okay.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:48 PM
1

You believe this? I mean...
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:36 PM
-3

Whether or not they are feminists seems way down in the list of considerations, even for having a better divorce. Source: Old enough to know a lot of feminists that got divided.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:34 PM
0

In if the opinion that jobs that have physical requirements should be gender blind. Aren’t you?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:32 PM
-1

I think misogynists are more likely to think it’s funny as it reinforces traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 09:31 PM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:52 PM
1

So so many women and moms prey on young boys and their kid’s friends. It’s not uncommon yet these destructive man-hating women would never break their narrative than admit that. There is no topic of required reading needed to describe this hateful statement as sexist.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:46 PM
1

I don't care if you have some kind of statement from research of different rates. Men and women are different. But lets not pretend that's what's going on around here. So you agree, that these kinds of statements that I presented are sexist?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 06:04 PM
1

It brings to light the fact that women feel entitled to being treated as a special class. That's not reasonably interpreted as "women are, on average, more entitled than men". Its not based on any research. And if the genders were reversed and presented a pic on tumblr, it would be frontpage for a whinefest on this sub. Example: It brings to light the fact that men feel entitled to commit acts of violence against women. Yeah, that's a bullshit statement and is the mirror image of the demonizatio…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:56 PM
1

That's why you do a peer-reviewed metastudy, like the one provided. Its also not the only link that deals with this. This isn't a genuine effort at truth. You first dismissed the data as only being from the US. You aren't even looking at what is provided. The information is there if you simply stop avoiding it.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:42 PM
1

You said the amount of false rape statistics was completely unknown. Then I provided them. You ignored them, claimed they were from the US, and still won't look at them apparently.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:01 PM
2

You haven't looked at the research then, because that's not true. The very first metastudy is from multiple countries, including the US, Canada, England, Scotland, etc. I'll be honest. If you can't even look at the research provided, it doesn't look like its research you are interested in, but a certain finding.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:45 PM
1

You can gather that, but I've literally provided you with most of the research available at this time on false accusations in that link. The OP spent 23 days putting together the post. No need to duplicate the effort.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:24 PM
1

And this is an example of the latter being not even right.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:20 AM
1

Well looky who is soooo "confident" about his position he turns into a raging asshole. Holy Kavanaugh! Here is how an actual labor economist says. I'm sure you are right with your GED in econ from /r/mensrights though. He's still active if you want to talk to him and learn something though.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 02:07 AM
0

Lol at pay gap “myth”. Read some labor economics instead of manworld be angry nonsense. The truth is that feminists and men’s rights activists are wrong and misinformed about the data. Carry on.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 01:52 AM
1

Here is an effort to look at it. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/290511.php
/r/MensRights01/10/18 11:26 PM
2

Depends on the details. And whoosh!
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:13 PM
1

Damn did I nail my analysis of you and you just stepped right up to claim the title. You desperately want me to be a member of some group you desperately want to virtue signal your opposition to and feel outraged, yet victorious. You even ignored my correction if your obviously and awfully flawed characterization of me and doubled down. Can’t make this shit up. I’m out now though. I’m not interested in Dunning-Krueger conversations.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:10 PM
1

I'm not a feminist. I'm a supporter of human rights for both men and women. Yeah, but Affirmative Discrimination does not help most men, and the same can be said about college admissions discrimination, and then there's this diversity thing. But somehow I don't think these forms of discrimination are things that trouble you. You'd be totally and completely wrong. I think that the growing lack of male participation in college is tremendous problem with serious implications that need to be remedie…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:57 PM
2

You are going to start citing logical fallacies and you are literally modding the naturalistic fallacy sub? That's rich.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:48 PM
2

You didn't read the article. If you haven't, then you are lacking data. grounds for ending a man's career and professional life. Oh look who also lies like rug? You do! He is a federal judge and is going to remain a federal judge after this. He doesn't have the temperament for a federal judge and is a blatant and obvious partisan and liar, so he should be removed. But the man is just fine. If he was that concerned, withdraw your nomination. This has been so harmful to supreme court that he didn'…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:47 PM
7

You should go back to the donald. This is a sub for people that care about human rights and not weaponizing men's rights for political reasons.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:37 PM
0

More whoosh! There is a difference between sober assessment and activism. Not everyone that comes to a different conclusion is an activist. You are an activist and they tend to believe everyone thinks like they do. I'm open to being wrong, but there are reasons to believe that discrimination still exists in the labor market and there is a long history of discrimination, so I think that it probably still exists and is non-trivial. If you earnestly believe that a feminist would say "discrimination…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:36 PM
1

You didn't read the link because you saw a prominent member of the red pill community and jumped to the first reason you could to refuse to read it.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:33 PM
-6

Ford's testimony is completely consistent with being a victim of sexual assault. Kavanaugh's testimony is completely consistent with someone lying to hide something. I don't know who is telling the truth with certainty, but there are good reasons to think she is credible and good reasons to think he isn't. And his behavior was so bizarre and deceitful that it is disqualifying from being a judge in any court. He should resign or be impeached.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:32 PM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:27 PM
1

Unethical behavior in the past means its subjective so I can do what I want. Change my view! Confirming my priors that trp advocates are unable to argue in good faith and have poor reasoning skills. Congrats.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:23 PM
1

Disparity is an occurance. I'm talking about research into that occurrence. You are reading advocacy into description. I don't know precisely how much the disparity is due to discrimination. Based on history, I'd say that its more than nothing and likely non-trivial. And that question is frankly absurd. How much of the disparity in the prison population is due to discrimination based on gender. 90%? 75%? 50%? If you can't answer that, it must be zero checkmate mra's! You seem upset someone might…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:22 PM
-8

I'm guessing someone with that username is a waste of time, so I'll pass.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:18 PM
2

You didn't even read what I linked, which is prominent members of pua and red pill communities. And they were frequently cited on trp. You clearly no nothing about the philosophy of ethics (and don't really care about it). Most of the don't in ethics are against natural behavior that hurts people. But again, you don't really care. You also don't care who you hurt in the process of dominating women. Just be honest about it. If a woman walks away from a sexual encounter feeling victimized and trau…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:17 PM
0

So you assert that women should be 50%? Of everything? Look at it again. I'm clearly citing research that suggests that female choice increases due to "feminism" reduces STEM selection. No, discrimination isn't responsible for 100% of choices. Yes, discrimination is responsible for some percentage of choices and that number is probably non-trivial, given the history of discrimination. This cuts both ways.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:00 PM
3

What a persecution complex you have! Using biology in place of morality leads to immorality. TRP encourages boys to engage in conduct that is unethical, disrespectful, and harmful to both men and women. It preys on young men that aren't able to have sex because of their position in the pecking order and gives them advice that won't work with most women, but will work with victims of abuse and trauma. It openly encourages sexual assault and if I was a reddit admin, I'd go much further than quaran…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:56 PM
-5

Says the guy whose entire reddit presence centers around their hurt little feelings from liberals.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:42 PM
3

I'm here to actually focus on men's rights and not misidentify common male problems and whine about feminism and tumblr memes. Hating women has zero to do with men's rights. It takes power away from men as we are viewed as hateful, callous assholes because of the behavior of a few paranoid basement dwellers.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:41 PM
1

The percentage of false allegations is completely unknown. The same goes for the amount of unreported rapes. You need to look into the data. Its not "completely unknown", unless you want to redefine those words. ;)
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:39 PM
1

Yawn. Not what I said at all.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:18 PM
1

"Routinely" in this context clearly means something like "common". Men aren't "routinely" jailed pending investigation. In fact, the routine is that they are free while the investigation is conducted. Its routine for nearly all suspects of nearly all crimes to remain at large during the investigation. I'd like to hear a reasonable definition of "routine" that describes that reality. I don't think there is one. And this sub "routinely" misunderstands the risks facing men from false accusations, w…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:18 PM
-1

I think that using Kimmel is stupid, but the intent is clear. Its a rubber stamp for advertisers. But using an unreasonable person isn't the same as it being unreasonable to ban certain subs that offend most people that see them. Or quarantined.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:13 PM
0

I'm certainly not like most in this sub, but I'm pretty open-minded about women in STEM. My hunch is that most just don't want to do it and ones that do face discrimination, which affects how many want to do it. There is an interesting piece of research that suggests that in countries that are more feminist, academically qualified women choose to enter STEM fields at lower rates than countries that are less feminist. That suggests to me that the disparity probably isn't solely because of discrim…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:02 PM
1

You are talking to someone that loves research and whose partner is involved in sex crimes investigations. Any normal definition of "routine" is the opposite of the truth. Most rapes aren't reported to police. Most reported aren't prosecuted. Most prosecuted don't lead to jail time. So the truth is "men routinely get away with rape". Look it up.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:59 PM
-1

Putin's policies... If you think supporting that is useful, you aren't thinking clearly. Is the Taliban the pinnacle of men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:42 PM
-2

I would say its their company and they can do with it what they want. I would tell the sub they should look in the mirror and actually read some of the more cancerous comments with broad support of the sub and ask themselves how most people would feel about them. Some of the shit on here is offensive. Full stop.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:41 PM
10

They didn't even measure discrimination. The title is just making shit up. They didn't even get a baseline for the field to know if women have more depression than men. And they didn't try and tease out if discrimination could have been a factor in depression, which would be necessary for evidencing causality. Its correlational research that says this is linked with that.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:39 PM
-2

So you set up a straw man to argue against. Try responding to what was said, which is harder than "I won't do that thing you didn't say whargarbble!!1!"
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:36 PM
-5

Reddit, the company, doesn't want people stumbling onto that sub because its offensive to most people. Its simple.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:35 PM
6

Does this sub want to be known as supporting Putin's policies? This is about divide and conquer. He wants to get his country and all other countries fighting each other so he and his kleptocrats can continue stealing with impunity. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:10 PM
2

It was fixed to be equally moronic I guess, so there's that.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:08 PM
-4

This is correct. A trial also is far different than a job interview. The burden of proof runs in completely opposite directions. If I'm sending you to prison, I need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you should go. If I'm sending you to a lifetime appointment on the supreme court, you need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you should go. Its pretty clear to me that there is reasonable doubt on Kavanaugh that he both committed the assault and deserves to go to the court. He should be …
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:05 PM
0

You are on a sub that treats false accusations as worse than murder. Activists do that. They pretend whatever is their pet concern is the most important thing in the universe. We do know through statistics that actual rape is a far greater concern than false accusations. Men are more likely to be raped themselves than falsely accused of rape, and its not close.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:03 PM
0

there has to be some reasonable person standard where you would say, when you agreed to X you implicitly agreed to related activity Y. That's not a reasonable standard. Someone consents to Y if they consent to Y. That's it. Maybe this helps. That's where the feminists want to absolve women of all responsibility and agency for saying "no I don't want Y", and make silence an implicit "no" that can convict any man after the fact in the event of buyer's remorse. The point of making sure you have con…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:00 PM
2

Here you go. This doesn't mean its reasonable to say "men are entitled", because they aren't overall, as a group, even if they are at higher rate than women. Its a sexist statement.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:53 PM
-1

Well it turns out that there is good evidence that men are more entitled than women. And when women are more entitled, it tends towards wanting to be coddled, but when men are more entitled, it tends towards violence against women. So...you were saying?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:51 PM
3

a lot of it has to do with making a convincing argument. That's an assertion. Compared to censorship, almost anything can be considered a more convincing argument. Its about as meaningful as that statement, whatever it means.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:44 PM
1

Well that does not fit the narrative. It also isn't what the research says.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:42 PM
6

This article and headline aren't science. A new study finds that depression, rather than discrimination, is driving the exodus of PhD-trained women from STEM fields. No, it didn't. It found correlations between women that leave stem and depression and perfectionism. It didn't compare them to men in the field. It didn't even measure discrimination in any way. People need to stop reflexively trusting activist interpretations of research.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:41 PM
-1

You don’t enough information to know this. We literally don’t know what happened except they drank, she thought he was drunker, they had sex and she says she didn’t want to. And she is in a far better position than us to know what that looked like, which matters a great deal.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:34 PM
1

I didn’t make the claim that women are entitled. ;)
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:05 PM
1

You mean women aren’t all entitled? Be careful saying that here. It makes people sad.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:03 PM
-3

It’s important for men’s rights to come off as whiny little bitches complaining about the internet. /r/tumblrinaction is over there.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:02 PM
-1

This is much more accurate and certainly inconsistent with “routinely”.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:00 PM
0

Define “often”. Back up these assertions. For instance, what is the percentage of names accusations among false accusations? Do you know? Do you know the most common categories of false accusations? You don’t, because if you did you wouldn’t say dumb shot like that.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:58 PM
1

If you think anecdotes are data, this is over your head.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:56 PM
0

Cool story. Show me your empirical research that says women are more entitled. Do you not see that “on average” isn’t the same as “women are”. For instances, men murder more, on average versus men are murderers. This sub is cancer with these kinds of shit generalizations.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:56 PM
-8

Clearly this is a pressing matter. Or something.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:31 PM
-15

Men aren’t routinely jailed for rape. They are routinely not charged. Rapists are lucky to even get a proper investigation.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:28 PM
4

So it’s a police corruption thing. That’s different than OPs claim.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:27 PM
-8

Do you tell them they are a bunch of entitled women?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:11 PM
-3

So male power has decided to make women special, therefore they are entitled. And here’s some cherry-picked stuff.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:10 PM
-14

This woman isn’t all women. And alimony wasn’t out in place by women. There are plenty of entitled men. Have you told these women friends how entitled they are?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 12:16 PM
-17

Women are no more entitled than men. Stop generalizing your biases. Do you have any close relationships with women? Friends even?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:35 AM
-43

Clearly a pressing issue that will help men or something. Fucking wake up. Ask yourself a simple question. Does this advance mens rights or is it simply meant to make you emotional with no recourse? Obvious.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:51 PM
1

This seems an important issue for mens rights. Tumblerinas are clearly part of the deep state feminist conspiracy ruining men’s lives.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:49 PM
-2

If you watch their testimony, they couldn’t be more different. She seems earnest and straightforward and believable. He lies, is disingenuous, is completely disrespectful, and blatantly partisan. He actually brought up the Clintons in some unhinged conspiracy rant. You have to be hopelessly biased not to see it. I have no idea what happened that night, but he is unfit for the Supreme Court. Just a disgrace and a liar.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:47 PM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:03 PM
1

What if the standard is “wait until someone starts getting hurt before putting myself at risk”? If that girl was a smaller boy, it would go about the same way. There are many reasons people don’t intervene. Researchers make careers studying it.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:39 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men’s rights. This shit belongs on street fights. This is trash. If he had started it and she beat him up, is that feminism? People fighting says nothing about human rights. I think some people just like seeing a woman get a beating tbh.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:43 AM
-2

I guess it doesn’t matter if he tried to rape her. Or participated in gang rapes. Investigate it. Clear his name if he didn’t do it. I think he has already disqualified himself, but if more is found maybe we can all agree he should stay off the court.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:39 AM
1

Okay OP. Turn it around. What if the find damning evidence against him. Who owes Ford an apology? Do you?
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:35 AM
2

He’d be banned before being answered.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:33 AM
8

Clarence Thomas took three days. Let’s stop the shit and admit why you really don’t want the investigation. It’s an obvious tell.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:30 AM
1

And now he is getting checked again.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 12:29 AM
1

TRP is a cesspool. No advertiser wants to be associated with those hateful losers.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:48 PM
4

Bingo. Kavanaugh is a piece of entitled shit that lied more than was honest in that hearing. He showed no demeanor for a pairing that he wants. He’s an embarrassment.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:47 PM
0

She’s a piece of shit, but metoo is much bigger than her. And you are delusional if you think most people that come forward are like her. They are regular people that have been victimized and empowered to come forward, like Terry Crews. Pretty sure he wouldn’t approve of this demonization of victims of abuse by this sub.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:45 PM
1

It’s very simple. They are a private company that has advertisers that don’t want to be associated with these subreddits. It’s business.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:43 PM
0

Let’s see, Trump is president, republicans control al branches, Kavanaugh is getting confirmed, but this little snowflake is feeling victimized. Toughen up buttercup.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:36 PM
2

They didn’t talk to any of his accusers and didn’t verify any of their accusations. They didn’t investigate this.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:53 AM
0

Just did, kid. Its not relevant as its not a criminal investigation. Can't help it if you don't understand what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:04 PM
-1

Dunning-Kreuger does that to people like you.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:02 PM
3

That's not true. There is corroboration with the therapist and character witnesses against both Kavanaugh and Judge. That is evidence. Most evidence isn't something like video evidence. Circumstantial and witness testimony is just like this. Lets say this was a murder accusation. We have someone that claims they saw it. She told her therapist about it years ago and claimed it traumatized her. We have character witnesses saying that the person behaved in other circumstances that might be consiste…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:01 PM
-1

Not relevant as its not a criminal investigation. But you know this and just can't formulate an argument that makes any sense, because there isn't one. Look at your posting history. Troll much? Lol.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:31 PM
-1

What horseshit. Investigate it. There are allegations. That's how we find out if its true.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:26 PM
-3

Then back an investigation by the FBI and clear the man's name. Doesn't he deserve to have his name cleared if he is innocent? I think we can agree that we don't want someone on the court if they did what these people claim he did, right?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:21 PM
3

Lol. What a joke. You can't even make a case without lying. A politician cannot order the FBI to randomly go off and do something outside their jurisdiction without having the legal authority to do so. Nice lie. Its not random. And you know it. This committee does not have that authority. Nope, the president does. Apparently you don't know how this stuff works. Maybe step aside and let the adults handle this one, kid.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:20 PM
-3

That's just bullshit and you know it. Allegations get investigations.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:14 PM
1

Aw, look who is projecting. You don't want the FBI to investigate because you fear what they will find. Its that simple. There is no reason not to investigate multiple allegations against a nominee. Your position and others that hold it make clear what is really going on here. You don't care if he raped them or not. Otherwise, you would favor an investigation that would clear his name if he was innocent. Don't you want his good name cleared from these terrible false accusations? No? Isn't that i…
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:11 PM
5

They've been used to investigate nominees before. There is precedent, so clearly the powers exist. They are federal investigating authority. Your ignorance isn't an argument. I don't have to waste any more time on some reddit troll. Out on your big boy underwear and look it up yourself.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:05 PM
5

It is well within their jurisdiction and has precedent. You are simply afraid of what they will find. Investigate it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:59 PM
4

Investigate then. Very simple.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:56 PM
-2

The only reason not to investigate is that you fear the results and would prefer to have a rapist in the court than not. Pretty simple.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:56 PM
2

Thats not an investigation. That’s a tv show. Have the FBI investigate. The only reason not to is that you are afraid of what they will find. Period. Anyone that doesn’t want an investigation makes it clear what their concerns are. And it’s not about the truth.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:52 PM
3

Then investigate me, especially if you are willing to testify under oath that I did it. Or anyone else. And this reveals the true intention, which has nothing to do with the truth. It’s purely political. Thanks for demonstrating to the group how this looks. And how fucked yo is it that people think criminal accusations should be ignored because that’s somehow unfair to criminals.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:50 PM
5

Don’t cry unless you investigate. It’s simple. There are multiple allegations. The FBI could have already started. But they haven’t been asked because republicans are afraid of what they will find. If he’s innocent, it should be really simple.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:33 PM
2

Then investigate. It’s really simple. No nominee since Thomas has had these problems and we’ve had a bunch. They hid a bunch of this guys files for a reason. They knew it would be a problem but Trump did it anyway. Is it that hard to choose someone not suspected of gang rape. Then again it’s not hard to choose a candidate for president that doesn’t brag about grabbing pussies, so maybe it’s a taller order than it seems.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:31 PM
6

Democrats are asking for an investigation. Republicans want to sweep it under the rug except they can’t because of how obvious it will be they do t care whether he did it or not. You agree we need an investigation right?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:26 PM
0

Yup. Par for the course when the goal is to appear as victimized as possible because of your gender. It would be nice if this sub cared half as much about male victims of rape, especially boys not raped by teachers, as they do about this nonsense. The data makes it clear. Men are far more likely to be raped than falsely accused of rape. Most false accusations are from parents of children and the mentally ill. Most aren’t named. Focus on the larger problem here, actual fucking rape.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:22 PM
1

Only posting parity and ignoring the huge disparity of results of violence isn’t useful. Results of violence is the largest problem with violence. Disparate results are absolutely relevant to that end. Im aware of this research and it doesn’t contradict anything that I said.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 03:16 PM
1

Your not getting laid with that attitude, sparky.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:32 AM
1

There are a lot more statistics than that. You seem to be pretending that’s not true. I gave some examples in a forum that has shorter answers. It isn’t a point in your favor that something wasn’t presented. It’s also a bigger problem than you let on. Intimate partner murders is half of female murders. That ain’t nothing. Feel free to check some statistics.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 02:37 AM
1

What kind of evidence do you need to have to believe someone was raped? What's a minimum threshold? Give me an example. This question is easy mode for most people.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:37 AM
1

That's circular. What evidence will you believe? Well actual evidence! Why not just answer the question? I don't find the timing suspicious, given she sent it months ago. I thought you weren't following the Kavanaugh hearing?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:23 AM
1

Domestic violence statistics are definitely related to domestic violence statistics. And the attitude of cops is absolutely meaningful, considering their role in responding and investigating domestic violence. Tbh, what you said is so weird it sounds like you don't understand how statistics work.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:20 AM
0

What would it take for you to believe an allegation?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:58 PM
0

Lol. Okay. What would convince you not to support Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:43 PM
1

I don’t respond to rudeness except to block. See if you can not rape, okay? Seems like a real challenge.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:32 PM
1

Depends on the accusation, the evidence, and their response. The evidence and accusations are mounting for Kavanaugh. I’m not interested in having an unapologetic rapist in the bench. Gorsuch went to the exact same school and didn’t have these allegations.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 11:30 PM
1

That's totally fair. I misjudged you a bit and I apologize. I mostly want the focus on OP and his trauma. Cheers.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:38 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/9hr341/fact_checking_false_rape_accusations_and_why_you False accusations was put forth as one of the reasons he has it bad. Pretty straightforward why I addressed. You seem needlessly hostile.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:37 PM
1

I simply knew human psychology better than you and care about other people and not my own selfish desires to have sex at that exact moment. I can’t make you feel compassion.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:20 PM
1

Much of ethics is the study of avoiding what we naturally do. Humans are driven to violence and rape, for example. Ethics is reasoning why these and other activities are immoral. It’s also the study of why certain positive behaviors, like helping others and politeness and consideration are moral virtues. Being considerate of others that are minorities isn’t some kind of suffering. That’s an exaggeration. Given that most people would agree with that, it fails by your own naturalistic standard.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:17 PM
1

A lot of successful marriages started that way. And even more events that women remember as a sexual assault start that way. This isn't a moral argument, its an argument by tradition, which is fallacious. We traditionally give women more custody than men because traditionally women take care of the kids. That doesn't make it right. Do you think OP just missed out on his chance to find a spouse? So your law would have to criminalize those games too. I would favor a law that when the man in this s…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 08:05 PM
1

I want to criminalize refusing to leave people alone. That's not simply speech. So you are arguing that you don't want it to be okay, but it is okay, because reasons. That seems like mental gymnastics to me. No where do you address the moral issue I raised, which is that speech designed to pester people into consent is immoral. You made zero case against that except some implication that all speech should be considered legal and, apparently, moral. How about addressing that?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 07:16 PM
1

It can be considered harassment if you won't leave someone alone after they have made it clear they don't want you interacting with them. Not in all states, since laws vary. Can you answer my question? Why do you want it to be okay to verbally pressure someone into sex that has said no?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:55 PM
2

Actually, you do have a right to tell people to stop talking to you. If they don't, it can be a crime. Pressuring someone for sex is immoral. Doing it while they are drunk is a recipe for committing a crime. No means no. Let me ask you a question. Are you afraid that you can't have sex with someone without harassing them verbally until they agree? Do you really want to have sex with someone that might give in because they either don't feel safe or they are afraid of upsetting you? What's driving…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:46 PM
1

So was I. It needs to stop. And that doesn't change the reality of what I said. Men aren't some widespread victims of false accusations. That's statistical nonsense, if you actually understand the research and not just biased presentations of the research.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:39 PM
1

Except that's just your speculation. What we know with certainty is that the user in question was breaking the stated rules.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:38 PM
-1

Men have comparatively few resources when it comes to domestic violence, despite some studies showing that over 40% of domestic violence victims are men. This is basically a misuse of statistics. Yes, men are just as likely to face an attack, but the attacks are far from similar. Here is an analysis of Maryland's domestic violence statistics. Domestic violence kills in many ways. When it comes to male deaths by domestic violence, men are more likely to be killed as a result of attempting to murd…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:34 PM
3

I'm sorry this is happening to you. I think right now you need to stop worrying about this other addict and worry about your own addiction. Focus on you. You need to stay clean and get your life on track again. Her IG feed is the least of your concerns right now. She could die right now and you still have a long road to sobriety and success ahead of you. Cut off this toxic relationship centered around heroin and conflict and take care of you. You are important here and you won't get better focus…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 06:01 PM
3

No means no. Further efforts after that aren't romantic and aren't seduction. He said no.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:55 PM
-2

It violates multiple rules on their sidebar. Stop trying to claim victim status when the real victim is the OP. Its not useful relationship advice on how to deal with his gf and this incident to bring up politics and a personal gender-based agenda. I don't know what their reasoning was, but I'd bet its some version of that.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:53 PM
1

I'd wager they didn't want it to devolve into some gendered politics food fight, which isn't what that sub is about. If you read the sidebar, there are multiple different rules this could have violated, like "No Politics!" or "Do not use the sub to push your personal agenda". The man is the victim here, not the people that tried to push some other gender agenda in the comments and are acting like they are also the victim.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:50 PM
4

If what OP is saying is correct, then this is an effort to incapacitate someone with a drug in order to have sex with them. He said no. She did it anyway. He gave zero consent. Let's call it what it is.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:43 PM
1

If what OP is saying is correct, then this is an effort to incapacitate someone with a drug in order to have sex with them. He said no. She did it anyway. He gave zero consent. Let's call it what it is.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:43 PM
-1

You tried to drag gender into it, saying that no one calls it rape if its a man. You are also claiming someone only called it "inappropriate" when they also called it rapey as fuck. Seems like you are trying to be a victim here by glomming onto a man that was an actual victim of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:40 PM
1

I always took my toddler into the men's room and it wasn't ever a problem. I probably did that until she was like five years old.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:32 PM
3

Its in Russia. Its not some female empowering paradise.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:17 PM
10

I'm not seeing anything that you are describing in that thread, except the guy claiming he was raped and people supporting him and calling it rape.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:15 PM
-8

This is the kind of ignorant whining that does nothing for men. Has it occurred to you that educational choices like these are decided locally and are addressing local needs of the community? Nah, its got to be the boogieman of feminism. This has zero to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:09 PM
4

Oh look, a racist appears.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:06 PM
1

You are making some strong claims, which I think require strong evidence. How do you come to believe these things? I don't disagree with in principle, but women can get away with it almost every time, SH is written to punish men, not any specific behavior, and that's primarily what it does. How are you measuring such a claim? How do you even evidence this? Do you think that a lifetime appointment to the supreme court should have a higher standard than firing someone in a work place?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:43 AM
1

Yes. What are the circumstances in which you would fire someone for harassment. How many claims? What kind? What circumstances? When should someone get fired for harassment?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:11 PM
1

It’s really simple and I suspect you know that. What kind of Turin would you agree to. It’s so incredibly open-ended it’s impossible not to have some kind of answer if you are being genuine. So what’s the answer? Have you ever seen a firing for harassment you agreed with?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:19 PM
1

Okay. But what would lead you to fire someone for harassment?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:17 PM
1

So you can't answer the question honestly. I'm trying to see what you actually believe and don't really have time for this intentional avoidance. I suspect you won't answer it because you don't actually have an answer that satisfies you and doesn't sound awful to pretty much everyone. I guess we'll never know though.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:59 PM
1

What would it take for you to fire someone for harassment claims? What kind of evidence, what kind of claim, etc. What is a minimum scenario where you would fire them and everything that false beneath that doesn't get fired.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:50 PM
1

I'm not sure you are correct that that is how it is mostly defined today. I've not seen evidence of that outside of twitter and whatnot. Can you answer my question? What would you fire someone for in regards to harassment claims?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:53 PM
2

I didn’t think you were being rude, for the record. You were quite polite and seemed genuine to me. Cheers!
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:32 PM
8

From the reasonable and balanced answer he already gave, I'd bet yes. I think his answer is spot on and I think there are common female aspects that are toxic, like emotional abuse. I'm all for being even handed, but that is going to require for men's rights and feminists to actually admit to their gender's more common faults and not pretend they are only victims. For instance, in relationships between men and women, she is going to be a lot better at destroying him emotionally and is far more l…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:29 PM
-5

Or maybe, just maybe, men don't have it as bad as you want to think. With that user name, you are biased as fuck and not worth listening to about this stuff.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:25 PM
0

Downvoted for presenting what research tells us, almost certainly because they don't like the first sentence. Sad.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:23 PM
1

That doesn't contradict his statement, which is the notion that one presents a larger problem. What people need to understand about statistics is that they aren't always measuring what you think they are when you are using them to justify your beliefs. Take domestic violence. You probably think that domestic violence is simply one partner attacking another. And you probably think that a domestic violence homicide is one partner attacking and killing the other partner. Its not really that simple.…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:21 PM
2

This comment is trash.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:04 PM
1

What does "supported" mean? What would you fire someone for in regards to harassment claims?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 05:49 PM
1

Feminists have a lot less power in Hollywood than people think. That’s how Weinstein freely operated for decades.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:54 PM
1

I’m talking about data. It’s the best time in regards to your concern.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:58 PM
1

This doesn’t change the data. Rape accusations are down 40% in 20 years. It’s the best day and age to not worry about this stuff.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:02 PM
1

I'm guessing English isn't your first language. Is this comment serious?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:41 AM
13

You don't sound like you can have a simple conversation without spitting at your monitor. Go for a walk, dude.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:37 AM
2

I am NOT fine with their being 0 tolerance for male predominant films. You will be relieved to know that's not a thing, unless you mean some idiots on twitter wanting attention. That's a thing. Rest assured, there have always been and always will be movies containing plenty of men and male-driven stories. This is good, because I love me some war movies and want more of them. Btw, when are we going to get a Korean war epic? Long overdue.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:35 AM
0

Nice anti-sematism, brah. "Bro, you can't make a law preventing me from raping chicks I think are hot," - Men Lovely... Its the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:25 AM
14

He was a child. She was an adult. Your argument, to the extent you are making one that is coherent, is that a child didn't feel threatened when explicitly threatened by an adult to coerce them into sex. You don't and can't know that, as it is his mind, not yours. If someone, particularly in a relationship with power dynamics, has sex and doesn't want to because of threats, its rape. Period. Making threats to coerce sex is rape. Every time.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:23 AM
2

And men and women are fully capable of sexual assault. This is conservative media that is being published here, not activism.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:17 AM
-3

This is another one of those articles that is literally designed to play on your biases. It has a specific agenda, which is to make you angry. Its also an unconfirmed and unconfirmable story. Its not journalism. Its activism, sensationalism, and trash. If it wasn't for the content punching bias buttons, this kind of phrasing would set off everyone's alarm bells. Older son – possessor of an immense dignity even at 16 – politely informed the man that his brother was in no way mentally deficient, h…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:14 AM
32

Using threats to coerce sex is rape. This isn't gendered and this isn't difficult.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:49 AM
-7

The “joke” has it backwards. Since the clinic is making a decision that could victimize someone, they must check in to make sure that consent is continuous. So what this sub is advocating is for a more strongest form of consent, like those pesky feminists.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:31 PM
2

Cool story bro. The plural of anecdote isn’t data.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 08:20 PM
3

Are you suggesting he should have tackled them for entering the restroom because that's what women would do to men? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:58 PM
3

The captain was blamed by all those feminists running Exxon...or something.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:56 PM
2

This isn't unusual for most signatures, even really important ones. The problem is when you cannot undo the damage done by forgery, not that we need the burden placed on any organization involved in the contract.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:48 PM
-30

So people that have a freeze response should get freely raped with no punishment? Or should someone not have to make their legal consent for fertilization clear?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:46 PM
26

However, how fucked up is it that there is literally no sympathy for this guy. Everyone has simply turned to him and said bad luck. Not even an arrest of the woman for what is literally fraud/stolen identity. I didn't see that in the article.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 07:44 PM
1

What is wrong with their approach?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:55 PM
1

Because I care about men’s rights and not just pretending the biggest threat to men is women and some “gynocentric” whatever. Turns out that if you look at the data and not just reading angry anti-woman bullshit, you get real concerns about men. Boys are victimized mostly as children. Men aren’t much at risk of rape as adults except from other men. Let’s focus on taking care of those boys, not pretending we have to worry about women raping us. How much time does this sub spend on preventing sexu…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:34 PM
1

Their prime minister ran on a platform of everyone having a toilet connected to sewage.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:50 PM
1

For being an actual human rights activist?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:49 PM
2

The reason I bring up her occupation is that she has done over 300 exams and manages a group that has conducted more than 2000 in the last three years. Her experience in how sex crimes operates and who is and isn't getting accused is completely consistent with the data that the link I posted measures. So you wanna turn this into anecdotes? I got you covered. You wanna look at data? I got you covered. Here's the kicker. If you were really at that kind of risk as a simple ER nurse, you wouldn't be…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:07 PM
1

You didn't look beyond that number to see who is making the accusations. Its parents of children and homeless people, mostly people that are crazy. The notion that there is some epidemic of women accusing men like you is a myth. Are you "the boogieman"? No. Is your dating life threatened by parents of children accusing people of raping their kids? No. So stop making up a story where every accuser that is accusing someone like you is somehow a large problem in the world of rape. And you don't inv…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:04 PM
-1

Somehow there isn’t enough content for this to not be in the front page.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:00 PM
0

I’m all about the plight of me. But this sub likes to pretend that feminists, who ha e very little power, are somehow the group responsible. Men are the ones in power politically. Men are the judges passing these sentences. Men are running the companies with the policies being complained about. It’s not some female boogie man. You are a thousand tones more likely to be raped as a male than falsely accused. But what does this sub focus on? Focus on the problem where it actually exists and stop ju…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:58 PM
-6

If there were more than this, it would be posted: see how that logic works?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:13 PM
-4

This is an idiot in Twitter. Have some perspective.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:57 PM
1

If opposing idiots on Twitter is what men’s rights is about, we are in trouble.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:56 PM
1

What studies are you referring to? How many men pursue shared custody, but are denied? Numbers matter here, right?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:54 PM
3

His ass.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:32 PM
-1

Most rapes aren’t punished. Stop making shit up too.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:31 PM
1

Today, in "I feel passionately about data that doesn't exist..."
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:18 PM
2

We don't need anecdotes when we have the data. Let's be honest here. No one is worried about demented patients and homeless people that think the boogieman raped them. As you can see from the data, the biggest threats are from parents of children and the homeless. Notice none of the stories pimped on this sub are those groups, yet that's the only real worry statistically. None of your scenarios were likely to result in charges to anyone. You know this. And my partner is a SANE nurse, if you like…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:17 PM
2

Based on what?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:42 AM
1

Prisoners should be 50% female!
/r/MensRights24/09/18 04:41 AM
1

Or maybe he tried to rape her.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:56 AM
1

Who did this happen to? The ones that come to mind for me are Kramer guy from Seinfeld going on an n-word rampage. That would get you fired from any job, even a comedian. What is this referring to?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:55 AM
2

Insurers like it to both prevent assaults and false accusations. Its like a dual control bank vault.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:51 AM
-1

Woman sentenced at 16 to life in prison for killing classmate released from Arkansas prison Chesapeake woman gets life in husband's 2017 murder Woman convicted of killing husband is sentenced to life in prison Life sentence for woman who shot, killed friend during fight over man Woman sentenced to life in prison for killing her ex-boyfriend in 2016 That's like one page of a google search.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:50 AM
1

I know what both terms mean.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:35 AM
1

Nice straw man false choice. Working hard buddy.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:44 PM
-6

Welcome to reddit! Nice brand new account bro.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:28 PM
1

Are you an enemy of women?
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:23 PM
1

No one uses a trial standard of evidence e for their beliefs. No one.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:17 PM
1

He’s not accused of crimes nor arrested or prosecuted.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:29 PM
1

To me it depends. How many accusers have stepped forward?
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:28 PM
1

What’s the most anti-female cult there is? Just curious.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:28 PM
2

Not unusual. A doctor in Houston just got probation for repeatedly raping a sedated patient. Rape isn’t much punished in the US.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:20 PM
2

This kind of view is odd to me as someone that is married. My schedule for my wife and I are a team. We both wanted a kid. So when she takes care of the kid, it’s for both of us and the child, not just her. When we work, it’s for us, not her or I. When we cook or clean or do anything domestically, it’s for us, not just one person. And hours are hours. One person’s explicitly monetized hours are the same as another ones “free” hours. When I see couples splitting up their money and credit for the …
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:18 PM
9

In fairness, they literally are right now.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:11 PM
-33

Wrong sub for that.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:10 PM
10

People should treat each other better.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 09:09 PM
1

This is so stilted and weird it’s like a bot. I’ll pass.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 02:55 AM
1

Do cite the area of the law that says a publication must take an advertisement it doesn't think fits its business model. You aren't a lawyer. You don't even know much about the law.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 02:13 PM
0

Do I have to hand walk you through the link?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:11 PM
1

Run away. Don’t learn.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 11:11 PM
-1

Its a reddit thread. https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/9hr341/fact_checking_false_rape_accusations_and_why_you/ There is so much data there that contradicts your position that is presented better than I could do here, its pointless to spend the time doing it. But there it is. Clicking links isn't hard to do and presumably you can read.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:55 PM
1

You didn't even look at the pile of research I dropped into your lap, did you. I understand why. If you did and still make that claim, you look like an idiot. Information avoidance is a well-known cognitive bias that protects the ego against acknowledging that they were wrong. For you, given your user handle and posting history, being right about this is among your most central identities. There is no way you are going to take a hard look at that data. But that also means you cannot possibly kno…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 09:54 PM
1

Here is a knowledgable and comprehensive presentation of the data. There is no reason to believe that some large number of men are falsely imprisoned for this and a ton of data suggesting its not. If you understand the nature of sexual assault and how it affects its victims, both male and female, then you wouldn't think this was fishy at all. Accusations go unreported for years. Victims try and bury it. If Kavanaugh had raped you or me, we might be motivated to brave the death threats and smears…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:38 PM
1

If we are dealing in likelihoods, then lets talk about some data. At least 90% of accusations are truthful. Combine that with reporting it to her therapist alone gets us to a much higher likelihood. Any claim you make, convert it to percentages of likelihood. You claim mental quirks causing false confessions. So what is the likelihood that simply being mentally is enough to cause a name rape conviction? Extraordinarily low, because by your own admission there are millions of the quirky people an…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:49 PM
0

Here's the data. That's what your claim is up against. As you can see, its absurd and unsupported by the evidence.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:45 PM
1

So you aren't familiar with legal challenges to discriminatory laws against women and are covering it up through deflection. Gotcha. Maybe the donald is more suitable for you. And you basically didn't respond in any meaningful way to what I said.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:43 PM
1

Define your terms. Post your research. State the methodology. Show an deep understanding of how the data was collected, what the categories mean, and what they don't mean. I've never met one men's rights poster that has a grasp of how the data is collected. They tend to glom onto one or two they think they understand and don't and pretend one other one is all the rest of the research. Now you wouldn't be doing that, would you? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, I'm sure you wil…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:25 PM
1

Don't say the one of the fundamental rights in a democracy? That's a pretty big deal. When women talk about patriarchy, what they are referring to (when not being pedantic and silly) is that what you refer to as "gynocentric" and think of as advantages, they didn't have the freedom to decide on. Male voters electing male politicians have decided these policies. From child custody favoring women to the draft to any policy you want to name, its men doing it to other men. And then this sub gets ril…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:16 PM
2

Can we put away the pitchforks until we find this in an actual journalism article and not this trash?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:20 PM
0

What is “extreme prevalence”?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:19 PM
3

Its not giving a day in child birth. It’s letting them off the hook for child support.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:18 PM
12

Abortion is safer than a pregnancy to term.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:16 PM
0

Do you have a relationship with the kid?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:13 PM
1

And most people, since they favor these laws around the world. What do you make of laws that have discriminated against women historically?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:07 PM
1

India has a well known problem with rape generally.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 08:34 AM
2

Not sure how that's relevant, but okay.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:03 PM
1

Dunning-Kreuger personified.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:33 PM
1

A woman who went to the school wrote an open letter. She knew all three people involved in this. Uh...people do all sorts of crazy things and suffer from all sorts of psychoses. Certainly, a political motive does not seem outside the realm of possibility. Reading comprehension lesson - I'm not saying that this is true, just that we need to ask the question and contemplate the possibility. Do you understand the difference between "likely" and "possible" when evaluating explanations? What evidence…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:33 PM
-10

FakerFact AI says this article is opinion, activism, and sensationalism and not journalism. Get a real source.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:14 PM
-10

No shit. Nothing says journalistic integrity like promoting that douchenozzle.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:13 PM
2

So 90% of the time and you glom onto 10%. But less than a thousandth of a percent of the time, and you go with it. The power of cognitive bias. Case study.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:10 PM
1

So she just so happened to go to school with Kavanaugh, suffered an attack from someone else, told her friends it was Kavanaugh, and told her therapist about the rape, and for reasons unknown to you and for which you have no evidence, she decided to blame Kavanaugh. What a set of coincidences! Its almost like him attacking her makes far more sense.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:58 PM
2

You brought up social science. If you don’t want to sound stupid, don’t say stupid shit. How many social science professors aren’t accusing someone of rape? Thousands. That isn’t predictive except to someone that is look g to justify their biases. Contrast that with the fact that about 90% of rape accusations are founded. Who is being an idiot with data here? You are. Pathetic. The rest is just as pathetic. Imagining a fantasy where she lies about it to her schoolmates and her therapist because …
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:36 PM
1

She is a witness. Don’t claim the mantel if evidence if you don’t k is what it is. And look in the mirror. You aren’t producing any evidence by speculation. Practice what you preach.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:27 PM
2

It cannot have been politically motivated that she told her therapist and high school all those years ago. Thats an absurd suggestion. The simplest explanation is that it happened as she said it. Notice how you had to make up a story where she did it for political reasons 37 years ago and how ridiculous that is. That’s cognitive bias. Think about it.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:21 PM
1

Using something for political gain has no bearing on the veracity. It does however affect people’s judgment because of cognitive biases. That’s simply a fact. The best path is to employ Ocanas razor to avoid these biases. The simplest explanation is that she was attacked, she told her therapist, she told people at school and it got around. If this was any other kind of attack and an apolitical situation, people would just assume she probably got attacked. Cognitive biases around politics is powe…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:19 PM
2

See my other comment. You are making up a story to deny the simplest explanation. He tried to rape her. She told her therapist. She told her schoolmates. She is now telling Congress. Or its a conspiracy to endanger her and her family to stop someone for purely political reasons. Is that something you would do? Because that's what you are claiming she is doing with no evidence. Circumstantial evidence is evidence. So is witness testimony. Apparently this is hard to understand for people. And this…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:14 PM
2

The problem is that your doubt requires you to make up an alternative theory where she tells her therapist about it, despite it never happening, because reasons. Or she tells her therapist about it, but its really someone else because reasons. Or she is making it all up to both her therapist and for Congress, because reasons, where she will almost certainly testify under oath about the event. And you have no evidence of any of that. The simplest explanation is that it happened, she told her ther…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:11 PM
0

So men, who have most of the power, are helpless to feminists and therefore it isn't men to blame, but women that are feminists. Seems like the real effort is to blame women for the legislation you don't like, despite men being the ones that passed it. That's a claim that makes no sense.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:08 PM
1

Witness testimony with two points of corroboration is the opposite of arbitrary. This whole effort to find reasons not to believe her is fucking awful cognition. The fact is that not matter what research you believe, people are being honest about rape when they say it happened. And there are two other data points that corroborate her claim. And throw in the fact that she knows she will pay a price (and is paying it now with threats to her safety) and there is little personal gain. So when you go…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:15 PM
1

Kids never discuss things that happen during the summer? Look at the mental gymnastics you have to go through to find "holes". Jesus Christ kid. Wake the fuck up. Its from a credible witness with two points of corroboration. Thinking that's good enough not to give someone a lifetime appointment isn't feminism. Its just not having Trump's dick in my mouth. Keep on sucking though. You'll get some eventually.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:58 PM
0

There is a whole cultural thing going on here that isn't particular to gender. This is targeting muslims, not men in particular. India has a well-known problem with rape generally. So the effort here is sectarian blame-shifting. And I wouldn't make defending Muslim men the men's rights hill you want to die on. They have terrible treatment of women. Its part of the religion.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:48 PM
1

So because you make up something with no evidence, we should ignore the evidence of eye-witness testimony. Gold medal in mental gymnastics right there. "I'm making shit up with no information. See how easy that is?" Wake up to your own biases.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:46 PM
2

This isn’t a court of law. This is an interview for a lifetime job. No job interview has similar standards to a criminal proceeding. The only reason that framing is chosen is to defend Kavanaugh. And there is some corroborating evidence from her therapist. And another piece from a student at the school suggesting this was well-known. In any job interview, if someone says to the person interviewing “hey, that guy raped me in high school”, they don’t get the job. Find a candidate without an attemp…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:44 PM
-1

India seems to have a history of failure to properly prosecute rape.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:37 PM
2

Its a special right muslim men have to ditch their wives by saying something three times, when she is stuck in the marriage with a much higher requirements for divorce. Not sure why its being defended here.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:36 PM
-2

That checklist didn't stop being mentally ill when they adopted a new framework. He's just called a personality disorder that meets the same criteria, which is a...wait for it...mental illness. And that you trot this out to defend his mental illness is hilarious. "He's not called a narcissist, he's just mentally ill! Pretty convincing there sparky. I'm pretty sure defending your god emperor is just a full blown fetish at this point. And one of these sounds like an actual fetishization.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:06 PM
-4

Did you just get your little feelings hurt by your God Emperor being mentally ill? A personality disorder is a type of mental disorder in which you have a rigid and unhealthy pattern of thinking, functioning and behaving. Oh wait, its a mental disorder? Well what is that? A mental disorder, also called a mental illness[2] or psychiatric disorder, is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning. Its one thing to be ignorant. But to be ignor…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:49 PM
-7

The symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder include: grandiose sense of importance, preoccupation with unlimited success, belief that one is special and unique, exploitative of others, lack of empathy, arrogance, and jealousy of others. Checks every single one of those boxes. Its not hyperbole. You just don't want it to be true.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:38 PM
-2

Responding to jokes from comedians about his penis in a presidential debate is fucking bizarre. Its mentally ill, tbh.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:29 PM
3

“Her college degree says she is a democratic operative”. Genius! You actually write that. And aren’t trolling?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:02 PM
1

Cool story bro. The taliban probably beats both parties with that. That means something something.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:59 PM
2

I’m saying we can make up anything without evidence. And that’s what you are doing. Wha evidence do you have that she’s lying? None. But her comes your fantasy as if it’s evidence. Is it fair to say that you are making up that story without evidence because yuh are biased? You post in this sub, right? That’s more evidence than you have for your fantasy.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:58 PM
2

So the memories you have of traumatic events from your childhood probably didn’t happen? I doubt you believe that. You want this to be true with her. You are desperate to believe she is lying without evidence. The notion that someone is required to come forward (when you don’t know why and don’t really care) to protect criminals should they wind up on the court is fucking sick.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:56 PM
0

Feminist politicians have little power. That’s absurd. Or don’t the men in congress have agency?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:53 PM
0

Witness testimony is evidence. He is claiming she is lying. Why would she? His reasoning is terrible.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:52 PM
1

So you would do this for a book deal and death threats?
/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:50 PM
-1

Nothing matters because of women. Jesus dude.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:01 AM
1

What if we make up convenient and unlikely stories? “Gee, I remember an almost rape guy the time seems to have made the identity of someone I knew go completely away. How weird? Because it can’t be that she was raped, because that doesn’t happen:
/r/MensRights20/09/18 07:01 AM
1

What if I’m actually a space alien and secret lizard person? What then?!
/r/MensRights20/09/18 06:59 AM
0

I can’t talk about research conducted by “they”. What study(s) are you talking about? How many have you read? How many false accusations are named in your 10% number? What study is this? Why are you choosing this one over the others? You keep saying there is no evidence. That’s not true and I’ve presented it. You might decide not to believe it, but it is evidence nonetheless. Ironically you dismiss this evidence and in the very next sentence make up a story from whole cloth about someone you hav…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:57 PM
1

Thanks, but requires a login. So use a one off gmail. Are you avoiding information likely to challenge your biases? Bias doesn't start after the article written and read. It starts when deciding what stories to cover in the first place. Sure, but even then political leanings is way down on the list of what's wrong with media, behind laziness, competition, sensationalism, sex, violence, money, etc. I suggest giving it a try. You will find it very hard to find prepackaged opinions if you don't rea…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:48 PM
3

Sure it exists. Thinking otherwise is poor reality testing. Even for the crappy "journalism", they rely on actual journalism for the knowledge it takes to know the context of their sensationalistic, opinionated, activist bullshit. And you know this, because you used CNN to give us the information you wanted for your biased conclusions. Here is a great tool for sorting what you should be reading. Its a AI that analyzes natural language to decide the quality of what you are reading. I'd wager our …
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:39 PM
-5

Of course it would. The problem with this story and this sub, is that it is tailor made for so many of them to have trouble overcoming their biases to see the truth. Most Republicans. Most supported Trump. Most have probably been burned by a woman. Most think most rape accusations are false, regardless of the data. Its very hard to see alternative narratives with those biases and this story, despite obvious explanations like the one you gave. Instead, folks are willing to believe that a series o…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:32 PM
0

If you care about the truth, you don't really watch any of that shit. You read straight news from real journalists. You are pretending to learn by engaging in conflict. And you clearly have an agenda, just like your news consumption would indicate.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:26 PM
0

Why are you posting in xxchromosomes? That's kind of weird. Why are you spamming posts in multiple subs? Why are you pretending that attacking Kavanaugh's accusers isn't defending him? So many questions...
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:18 PM
1

I have been falsely accused of stalking. So you are wrong. If you think "possibility" is good risk assessment, you are confused. Anything could happen. The question is "how likely is it to happen?" And the answer is pretty clear for the vast majority of men that act like civilized people, "not very fucking likely". Nothing about what happened with the therapist is really that strange. You just have biases that make you want to grasp onto anything you can to deny her story.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:16 PM
0

Everyone has confirmation bias. I don't rely on my biases for claims about society. I rely on research. I love having my biases proved wrong by research. Its happening right now in grad school, where some of my beliefs are challenged by research. I go with the research over my prior beliefs. Do you have examples of when that has happened in your life? I have read the studies and not impressed with them. Just as the statistics on rape on campus is a poor study. Which study are you impressed by? W…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:12 PM
8

Imagine she is telling the truth for a moment. Can you think of a reason that isn't political that she would want this? Because the OP reason is nonsensical. Lying to either the FBI or Congress after talking to both is two different crimes, regardless of the order.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:57 PM
1

Using that is itself poor reality testing. Its a cognitive error and a logical fallacy. These are well-studied phenomenon. So is how most women handle being raped, if you bother to look for academic sources. Btw, one of her classmates came forward and said this was well-known at school.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:41 PM
-3

Sure, let's discuss it. Why can't you work?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:23 PM
-4

Sure, let's discuss it. Why can't you work?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:23 PM
-1

There is an explanation of why she is doing this now. She doesn’t want an Originalist on the Court. If that's your goto opinion, you aren't reality testing very well.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:21 PM
-1

Excuse me for supporting our president and wanting equality for both sexes. In one of your very few posts, you implied you were apolitical. That was a lie, as evidenced by nearly everything else you posted. And you are trying to characterize Trump as someone favoring equality for women. Just keep pressing those buttons, girl. Tell me, were you comforted by a Swede telling you that right-wing articles trying to scare you about Sweden were bullshit?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:19 PM
1

Walt is a natural language AI program. He uses language to categorize the content of articles by looking at its language. Walt says this article is opinion, agenda driven, and sensational. Walt doesn't think this article is journalism, wiki, or satire. I'm in school studying education, one of the more liberal departments at any school. And I'm male. I'm having zero problems. Stop believing agenda-driven, sensationalist trash.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:13 PM
-1

I'm starting to think a lot of this sub's traffic is driven by men that are just fearful people in general. I'm almost fifty and seen loooots of societal change and I see no reason to be afraid of the shit people are afraid of. You have highly upvoted posts fearing to be alone with any female ever. They are either regularly engaging in shit women should actually be afraid of, want to and can't trust themselves, or paranoid to the point of needing some help. If you are in the west, it's completel…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:09 PM
1

You know what? Mansplaining is a first world problem. You know what? Complaining about this facebook post is a firstworld problem. No women needs to hide the fact that she cooks dinner. Jesus Christ. For those keeping score at home, this post seems designed to hit the buttons most people on this sub agree with. A female mocking feminism, implying she can't tell someone she cooks dinner, obvious bullshit danger to men from feminism gone awry (fucking losing the right to vote? that's idiotic), and…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:06 PM
-2

Lol. The old "fear of getting doxxed" chestnut. I doubt you are so important that there would be a concerted effort to dox. But you are implicitly admitting you say shit that is so indefensible that you could be harmed by people knowing it. That's either paranoid or a convenient lie. You are attacking the nominee's accuser. Did you forget which thread you are in? I'm guessing you are lying about both here.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:56 PM
-2

The most reasonable explanation for her telling her therapist is that it happened. So unless you believe she made up a gang-rape or that she is taking a true story and sticking Kavanagh's name on it, both of which require mental gymnastics, then the more likely explanation is that it is true. If she hadn't told anyone and there was evidence of some kind of subterfuge, agreement, bribe, whatever, I would agree. But there isn't. And if you don't think she is going to pay a personal price for no ob…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:53 PM
2

I've found two suspicious ones in the last few minutes. This place is being brigaded.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:38 PM
1

And a disabled first responder who likes to lounge on boats in Republican hats from 1984 who announces their month old account isn't a Russian troll. And "she" says this: I’ve never voted, therefore never voted for Trump. I don’t identify with either party. And praises Donald Trump on the_d. I have no idea if this is a troll account, but I couldn't construct one that looked more like one if I tried. Second suspicious account I've found browsing this sub for five minutes. We are being brigaded.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:37 PM
-7

When a sub is upvoting complaints about the comment section of fucking NZ being full of idiots like all comments, something is wrong. Focus on what's important, men's rights. This is just trash.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:25 PM
-3

So we have a six day old account that has posted on xxchromosomes using this sub to try and defend the president's nominee. We can discuss this issue, but OP is suspicious as fuck. He's has more posts in a few days than most people have in a few years. And his complaint doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:21 PM
-5

He did and we don't know if she is making it up or not. But telling your therapist about it is either the longest and most thoughtful conspiracy ever or there is probably something to the story. My money is that she is remembering something real.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:17 PM
2

Let's assume her version is what really happened. Does that change anything?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:14 PM
1

How were you used for sexual pleasure? What happened?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:08 PM
3

All women?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:02 PM
2

All of the top comments aren’t saying it’s cool. It’s exactly the opposite of what you are claiming.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:02 PM
1

You are counting What? You’re being pretty sensitive.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:47 PM
3

When women have special rules that make it easier because they are women, it’s insulting.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:40 PM
1

Two whole question marks.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:31 PM
1

It’s not being objectively measured.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:30 PM
2

The problem is assuming that most women agree with the extreme. Or men. This sub frequently has misandrist comments that go highly upvoted. It looks really bad.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:17 PM
-2

NOW doesn’t control shelters. We need to stop thinking that just because everything that’s group supports that happens is causes y that group.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:15 PM
3

Rule enforcement is often squishy. That’s life.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 12:14 PM
0

Just made it. No one seemed to have a decent answer. So step up, sweetie pie.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:29 PM
1

So you can't present an argument against your position. Got it. Carry on, science dude.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:25 AM
1

Funny how most men don't see this. We must be stupid or something. Its just so obvious, right? Of course you presented nothing against your position and pretend to present "analysis". But that's science, right? Oh wait, science doesn't work like that. Carry on.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:12 AM
1

And statistics I’ve seen have female names with identical resumes getting hired at a lower rate than male names. Seems similar, eh?
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:03 AM
0

Just to point out to people that might not catch what you did, ignored what I said, and pretended to speak for everyone on this sub while disagreeing with someone on this sub. Can't make this shit up, my dude. Carry on.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:56 AM
-2

Who is we? Men aren’t as interested in school. Men aren’t as good at school. The same lazy bullshit that conveniently allows you to make up a just so story happens with both. You are just more charitable to men than women.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:38 PM
-6

If this is where you “win”, you are the loser.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:31 PM
-8

If you don’t understand the critique, you aren’t worth my time. I’ll pass.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:34 PM
-8

Imagine believing a cherry-picked list of an activist is useful.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 09:15 PM
-7

This sub: Women just aren't as good at certain jobs, so we can ignore gender bias explanations for any pay differences. Also this sub: Men aren't given the correct climate for education and so it is gender bias as an explanation for any school differences. Be consistent. For the record, I believe that climate has an effect on both.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 08:09 PM
-3

Imagine literally believing this.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 07:36 PM
36

I'm very suspicious of a movement that gets glommed on to in great stridency and rage and without nuance. And even when people try to discuss it in a nuanced way, the nuance itself is attacked. I see this when trying to discuss the misuse of rape statistics on this sub.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 07:33 PM
1

This isn’t a legal thing.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:41 AM
1

I think you are answering the wrong post.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter