TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

slam9 Archive

View 3 posts and 542 comments by slam9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9059233/Women-girls-groomed-gangs-forced-sell-drugs-NOT-face-criminal-charges-CPS-says.html It is policy to give women lighter sentences and more benefit of the doubt. If people are concerned about gangs forcing people to work with them, why not say that anyone forced by gangs to cooperate shouldn't face criminal charges? Why limit that to a gender?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:46 AM
1

The narcissism of people like this is so tiring. When are people like this going to start paying others for their failed relationships? Why do they think their time is so valuable but everyone else's time is worth jack shit
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:08 PM
23

I was in an optional lecture hall like this where I heard songs of the most sexist and terrible shit in my entire life. I remember the god awful lecturer, bell hooks. The entire lecture was about how resources should be diverted to help black women and none should go to white men, with black men barely getting any, and white women a little bit more. Just about every joke was so overtly sexist against men that if something a fraction as hostile was said against women they would have been kicked o…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 07:14 AM
2

"People created society so people can't complain about society". It's literally just pointless pandering without any real argument
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:10 AM
2

Where in the article did it ever say he had a gun
/r/MensRights24/04/22 10:07 AM
8

I don't know if you're intentionally avoiding the point, or if you're actually incapable of understanding, so I'll say it one more time. Yes not all military jobs are on the front lines. You're not a genius for pointing that out. The fact is that there are jobs on the front lines that require being shot at, and often killed. Women aren't drafted for those jobs. Men are. No woman in recent western history died on the front lines from being drafted there. Many men have been in that position. TL;DR…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 02:11 AM
12

Can serve in combat roles isn't the same as being forced to serve. Again, literally the entire point of the post
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:57 PM
46

Literally Israel is the only one that requires combat service for women. Lying and saying Norway, Sweden, etc, fit the bill shows you don't know what you're talking about. Women are required to help with military jobs, not drafted for combat training
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:50 PM
17

Actually that's kind of important to the point of the post and the thread that you're responding to. But sure, pretend it's not relevant because you don't want to talk about it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:48 PM
17

"Neither here nor there?" What the hell are you talking about? You somehow manage to literally miss the entire point of the post, and still claim other people off topic!? Let me say it simpler for you: Men are required to be soldiers to fight and die. Women are required to help at the home front and hand out food. That's not equality and is literally the entire point of this post. And that's only in the most "egalitarian" countries in the world. Most places don't even require the easier service …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:47 PM
20

Yes they are, they're ignoring the entire point of the post, and avoiding answering the question. Look at the replies. Instead of addressing a single thing they say "more roles than combat ones are required in war", as if we didn't already know that, and as if segregating those by men/women is equality
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:43 PM
14

So literally ignoring the entire point of the post
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:42 PM
12

That's literally not egalitarian. Saying that men have to be conscripted as soldiers to be shot at and killed, and women have to help in non-combat roles, isn't egalitarian
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:41 PM
41

...Which is inequality. Telling men to be the ones to be shot and killed isn't fixed by saying women also have to help the war effort, but not as soldiers
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:40 PM
8

Right, unless you're a woman then that logic no longer applies
/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:53 PM
1

If sex is special then it's hypocritical for you to like sex workers. It's literally just sexism for you to say that sex work is bad, but only for men who participate in it. If sex is special then it's bad for both men and women to have sex for/with money. If it's your right to personally dislike men who have paid for sex then it's also a right for men to not want to date women who have sex for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 01:56 AM
0

Sex workers also choose to do what they do
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:10 PM
-1

You're the one with mental gymnastics here
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:10 PM
0

Sex workers are literally women who have sex with lots of other people
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:09 PM
1

This doesn't make much sense. You wouldn't want to be with someone who pay for sex, but you also think it's bad that people don't want to be with sex work workers? Sorry but that's literally just hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:08 PM
1

They had a suspect. They found have done DNA comparisons to the man who was arrested
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:38 AM
4

She couldn't even identify the man consistently, insisted she could anyway, and it's everyone's fault but hers. Also rich that before she said she was sorry to the innocent person whose life she ruined, she was sorry that she didn't arrest the right person... Almost sounds like nothing happened in the first place and she made it all up
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:40 AM
1

Wait what detail did the Netflix producer notice? How did nobody else notice?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:32 AM
1

Wait what detail did the Netflix producer notice? How did nobody else notice?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:31 AM
3

Because you're one person who maybe knows how you and ~10 friends think, and if you were even slightly honest would admit you have no idea how the majority of men, even those that have other similarities with you, think
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:14 PM
1

No that's kind of my point, but being a guy didn't mean you "know how guys think".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 04:00 PM
7

Yeah I don't think you know what can be considered "typical"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 03:58 PM
5

That's kind of stupid honestly. I only have 1-3 people I would consider a friend with no mutual friends. If you're friends with someone you meet their friends. It also depends on what you do. Your friends don't fall out of the sky. If you live your life/work in an area that's predominantly one gender then you'll only make friends of that gender. It's not really complicated. Just look at men who work in fields dominated by women, or fields about 50%
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 03:58 PM
8

It's funny that you say this is verified, but don't list a single "ACTUAL source"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/21 05:20 AM
28

The amount is so small that it almost isn't. 7k is laughable compared to the legal fees and salary in question.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:53 PM
12

Yeah this is not like a prime example of gynocentrism and pussy passes, where blatant sexism and discrimination only gives a token settlement that amounts to nearly nothing compared to the salary in question or legal fees
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:52 PM
8

The sad part is that justice being done, like the case here, is so rare I don't know how he did it. The blindness to discrimination like this is so rooted in the system I genuinely think it's a miracle how he pulled the lawsuit off.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/21 11:35 PM
0

The overlap of people who think both those things is just about zero
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:51 AM
2

Who the fuck idolizes Russia? Seriously actually give a link to anyone of note doing that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 06:56 PM
1

Lol, this entire thread has been admit you dating we should "respect sex workers". You clearly do think it's an insult because last the last comment you said: throwing poorly crafted insults... You having amnesia is not me making stuff up
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 09:26 PM
1

The fact that you're pro prostitution, but think that it's an insult to say you see prostitutes, tells me how hypocritical you are. If you truly believed sex work is all that, then you wouldn't think it'd be insulting to say you go to one
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 08:30 PM
1

Actually the comment said: "She looks old as hell the literal definition of rode hard and hung wet" Are you retarded?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 08:18 PM
1

Sounds like you know about as much about economics as you do about sex. You're probably the guy at the party who always brags about how much pussy he slays but had actually never had sex for free. You seem to be pretty obsessed about sex workers, and want to prove you like them. I hate to tell you, but that actually won't make them like you any more next time you pay them $3000 to give them oral. Or more likely to compliment them on their only fans lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 08:12 PM
1

Check the original comment. They actually didn't until you responded first.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 08:08 PM
3

Amazing. You didn't even attempt to answer the question or even say something related to it. Since I already know people like you won't ever actually answer a direct question I'll just skip asking you 10 times while you deflect, and address what you brought up. Since you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with prostitutes. People don't actually hate sex workers that much, they hate being told to "respect them and gold them on a pedestal. No sex work isn't a hard job. It requires basically no sk…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 08:03 PM
17

What's sad is the "respect sex workers" crowd actually thinks this unironically
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 07:54 PM
2

True but what did that have to do with what you said or the comment you replied to?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 07:52 PM
2

Sounds like someone who pays for sex. I've never been with a whore, have you? You seem to be quite interested in the topic
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 07:51 PM
2

Only after the relationship has started though. A rich and famous dick won't have a problem getting women, he'll only have a problem keeping them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 10:01 PM
0

How the fuck is that "individualist culture"? The crowd that says there are 90 genders, and your preferences in clothes makes you not a man, is about as distinct from individualists as you can get
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 09:59 PM
6

You don't seem to understand what he's saying. He's not denying everyone has faults. He's saying that women will treat any fault as a reason to hop to someone better if they have the chance. Weather he's right or not you should at least attempt to understand the point that he's trying to say
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 09:56 PM
2

I'm not really a red pill advocate, but nothing here has to be "reconciled" with red pill ideas. All red pill ideas say is that those men will have lots of options to choose from, and they do. If anything it validates the more niche area of red pill ideas that say women only really care about the money. I don't see how this is against "the red pill" at all
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/20 09:54 PM
57

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlatantMisogyny/comments/juchnj/a_comment_on_a_video_of_a_female_genital/gcekgqe?context=3
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:37 PM
4

Have you ever actually been on a date? Women talk the most on dates most of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 06:07 AM
1

Well for starters it's a post asking about men, so not really. When someone asks a question about you it's the default reaction to answer or. Nowhere in the question did it say it's directed to women; it only says that in the flair, which most people ignore because flairs area useless 90% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 06:06 AM
3

Literally no comment is saying how women think, it's guys answering the question instead of women, that's not the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 06:04 AM
3

Then why don't you edit your question to say "question for women" in the post? Most people ignore flairs because they're usually useless
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 06:02 AM
1

Well part of that is the fact that it's a question about men. When someone asks a question about you it's a default reaction to answer. Also it's not stated in the question, it's a flair, which most people ignore because of usually doesn't have important information
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 06:01 AM
6

This comment section is a graveyard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 05:58 AM
4

It's kind of amazing that people don't see this. Porn stars and escorts are all for the easy money when they are young and have the looks, but a ton of them suddenly become sex negative when they can't do it lucratively anymore. If course they still keep the money and never complain when they had it good. And still morons believe that women earning ridiculous amounts of money just for having sex is somehow exploitative towomen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:29 PM
2

They literally have income statistics openly available on only fans, please bother to check that before spreading your bullshit. Yeah most don't make millions but most do make way more than a regular job to have sex. Also, your analogy is pretty bullshit. A lot of female porn stars don't do anal, but even if they do the usually enjoy it. You don't become a porn star without liking sex, and your analogy is pretty stupid because these women aren't straight men
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:24 PM
5

I don't know, but it's not because of some oppressive patriarchy forcing women out of plumbing. It's because women choose not to go into those jobs. But unlike tech fields (another area that women choose to go into less) feminists don't make a massive push to get women into it, because they only care about equality of cushy jobs
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 06:42 AM
1

Oh you were mocking it. Sorry hard to tell sarcasm from text
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:41 AM
5

Not quite sure what the other person's point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:41 AM
6

Why do you think a woman only has to choose between sex and waitressing? I'll say again, what economic opportunity do men have that women don't? There are plenty the other way around, but I can't think of a single job that's harder to get as a woman than a man these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:40 AM
6

In literally the next sentence it says that's about 3% of the military... So I was right. If you can Google that you can also Google the number of women in the armed forces right now of major Western powers (hint: it's way more than 3%, but still a small percentage. Basically the whole point of me and u/OG_walrus)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:35 AM
1

Ok I guess I falsely assumed, but still why are you taking line a prophet? Why are your saying "divine" and "sacred"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 05:32 AM
3

Amazing response. Truely well thought out and not a cop out at all
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:10 AM
3

Lol, why would "red pill" types be glad that women are out of work?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:09 AM
16

....By using sex to gain an advantage over the people that actually work. In what modern country does a women not have basically the same (or more) opportunities than men? Yet there are still many voluntary prostitutes and sex workers
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:07 AM
22

"full". "Eager". Please give a statistic on that. I'll bet money it was less than 5%. Also why are you putting the USSR on such a pedestal? It has basically nothing to do with this conversation. Pretty much all of soldiers were conscripts (like most countries involved), committed many war crimes, and even from the stance of "feminism" had less women serving than modern Western militaries. What makes you think the women involved were so "eager". If I had to guess I'd say you brought it up because…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:05 AM
7

That's literally bullshit. Bother to look at the actual statistics, the top earners are making millions per month (and are all exclusively female)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 03:01 AM
3

Sacred essence? Divine specter? Jesus radical feminism really is a fucking cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 02:59 AM
6

No it isn't consistent at all. There's still a pretty big divide on sex positive and sex negative feminism. Especially with sex work. The term "sex worker exclusive feminists" is a term that's now gaining traction in leftist spaces. Also, it's funny that you not only pretend to arbitrate here what a "real" feminist is, but also claim that people thinking women should do what they want is one of those fake types of feminism. It's truly amazing how toxic you people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 02:58 AM
2

I guess I'd agree on that. Lying to use someone for their money and gifts is way worse than lying to someone to give them an orgasm! Seriously though I can't grasp how women have this disonance of seeing sex as evil if a man does it, to the point that he owes a woman gifts and money, but a woman actually using a man is somehow fair
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 02:49 AM
3

Pretty typical response. Don't address a single point that was made, and basically deny reality by pretending that's not what "commitment" means 99% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:56 AM
3

You say that like women don't want to fuck men
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:26 AM
2

It's funny that the women who agree with this BS don't even pretend to hold fair standards. Women lust after people too, it's just easier for them to get what they want so they pretend to hold some kind of high ground because a man has to work harder to get laid. What's really sad is that women think someone a man wanting have non-commital sex with someone is some terrible crime; but a woman just wanting someone's money or to otherwise use them in a relationship, is A ok
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:20 AM
1

I find it funny that women think wanting to have non-commital sex with someone is on par with, or worse than, faking a relationship to use someone or get their money. Well I guess I should say a man wanting sex, if a woman sleeps around that's empowering and they won't can her a "manenizer", all the while hating a guy that does the same thing, because that makes him a womanizer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:17 AM
2

Said as if women are chaste angels who don't want to fuck anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:14 AM
2

Amazing logic right here. A couple doesn't stay together so it must be the man incapable of committing. Of course by commitment you mean a one sided financial commitment, where if anything goes wrong the woman takes half the money and leaves. It's funny how women complain about men not "committing" when the only thing they put in is time and get free stuff out of it. If the commitment isn't symmetrical quit bitching any how men are "inable to commit"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/20 01:10 AM
13

But not really
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 09:49 PM
3

Ok, I just see this guy's name a lot and wonder why he's so significant.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/08/20 03:39 PM
5

Who's Andy Warhol?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/08/20 04:52 AM
11

We really should be appreciating her seminal work that's a lesbian separatists wet dream about genocide "cutting all men to pieces".
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/08/20 04:51 AM
2

Ok that works thanks
/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/08/20 06:55 AM
1

I mean a link to the picture, like the direct link to imgur or whatever is hosting it, because it won't load at all for me and if I click it, it says "URL scheme not recognized"
/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/08/20 06:44 AM
1

The link seems to be broken to me, could you post it in a comment?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/08/20 06:41 AM
34

r/lostredditors
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/07/20 01:15 AM
1

You don't understand what I'm saying, but I really didn't expect anything different based on your previous comment. You have no idea, at all, how much I pay to go on dates/meet women. It could be zero, and that doesn't change the fact that I'd still be expected to pay. I do move on, what the fuck are you taking about? I'm not talking about some rando expecting it, who cares about them. I'm seeing the majority of women won't pay for dates. I can "move on" all I want, that only proves the point th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:17 AM
1

No, you thinking that it's equally easy to find women that are willing to go dutch is what's against reality
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:15 AM
1

Citation needed
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:13 AM
2

Do you speak English? What the hell does this comment have anything to do with that the other guy said
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:13 AM
2

You're delibretly missing the point. It doesn't matter that they're are some (rare, good luck finding them, dispite having safe sex with them) super cheep prostitutes, but even if they only charged a nickel it would definitively be harder for men to get sex than women, because men have to pay. Seriously, how do you think your string of comments here was even remotely relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:11 AM
1

If men are paying for it and women are getting it for free then it's literally not as easy for men as it is for women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 12:08 AM
2

Where you said that it's equally easy to have sex. If someone has to pay for something, and someone else doesn't, it's pretty obviously not equally easy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:53 PM
2

I think this is a better argument tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:51 PM
1

... except for sex of you're a woman. That's the whole point. It costs much more to have sex as a man than a women. Meaning it's harder for men to have sex than women, meaning your post is total nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:49 PM
1

It's amazing how you can say that and still not even understand what you're saying. That proves that it's even harder for men to get sex because regular relationships are even more expensive for them than prostitutes. It's almost amazing how you showed the ability to miss the point so completely that you think that's an argument against his case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:47 PM
0

This is one of the most ignorant comments I've seen on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:45 PM
1

You aren't even making sense. A lot of men don't "buy a woman a drink every time they're interested". It's the fact that it is always the man that's expected to pay in basically every circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:44 PM
0

That still doesn't address the claim that the post makes saying it's just as easy for men to have sex than women. If every option requires the man to pay, or be super attractive, then it's pretty clearly not equally easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:42 PM
2

That's like saying it's not hard to buy illegal drugs because dealers have lots of clients. Basically, that's not an argument
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:39 PM
1

This still doesn't answer the top comment, how is it possibly fair or "equally easy" to get sex by expecting men to pay for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:38 PM
3

Are you a woman, a really attractive man, or have you never used dating apps? Because pretty much every statistic about them shows it's really only easy for women or super attractive men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:36 PM
2

Depending on where you live. Your statement is objectively false in a lot of places. In fact lots of countries have laws making it illegal for men to pay for sex, but not for women to charge (or in done countries them to pay either). Meaning that a prostitute can be totally open about it and not be touched by the law, but the cops will still arrest a man if he comes and pays. When is the last time you heard of a sting operation to catch prostitutes? Even if you have heard of such a rare case, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:35 PM
1

WTF? One has to pay money, the other doesn't, that is pretty clearly easier for one than the other. The roughly even number of sex partners also doesn't mean anything, no matter how much really it was for one partner than the other, if a couple have sex that's going to be about the same number for men and women. There are also more young men alive than young women, so even numbers actually still means it's harder for men to get sex
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:31 PM
1

Don't you mean "not a percentage below"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:24 PM
17

It reminds me of that video where a woman thought she had such good pick up advice that she could easily get tons of tinder dates with a male profile, and failed. All iit proved is that most women actually don't know anything about how women choose men
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:24 PM
19

"Why don't you ask just be good looking brooding artists with an instrument that I like!? Can't you all just do it?"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:21 PM
15

I'm not sure what point the poster was trying to make, but all it proves is that a lot of women really don't give a damn about men. They complain if men do anything sexual that they don't like (like objectifying ), but they will only ever pretend to give a damn if you do something that they think is sexy. Women complain that men get turned on looking a nice boob, and then don't see any problem with women only caring about men who are sexy dancing monkeys to them. Top it off with "hey I like basi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:20 PM
3

Maybe because there's more to life than channeling our "festering emotions"🙄 into music just to try and be sexy to women? Not everyone is an artist, not all artists like to make art about depressing emotions, and not all of them want to choose a instrument(not necessarily musical) that "gets into panties" instead of something they actually like. I don't need to be sexually pleasing to you to be taken seriously for non sex related matters. There more to life than sex. You sound like a 15 year old…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 06:03 PM
1

That 98 percent figure isn't even accurate
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:59 AM
8

It's funny that the stupid analogies people use to disparage "all lives matter" (like saying it's giving a band aid to both an injured and uninjured kid), are objectively incorrect about race; but actually a good analogy about gender.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:17 AM
3

I agree that black on black and white on white murders aren't super relevant here. But when people bring up white on black murders why do they not bring up black on white murders? Are you willing to say that they have a motive?
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:11 AM
2

I don't think this is a valid argument because we don't have to only focus on one thing. Why do you have to ignore one in order to focus on the other? The only relevant crime statistic to use against people saying "black lives matter", is others interracial violence stats. White on black violence is one of the least common types of interracial violence.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 04:08 AM
2

Climate science is real. Climate scientists are real scientists. Climate change is real. Large climate movements have been coopted by powerful special interest groups. Powerful right wing governments and figures have made an effort to go against climate change (since Reagan. Before that right wing governments actually took climate change more seriously. Margaret Thatcher for example was the first major political candidate in the UK to take it seriously). The reason why climate movements are pret…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/20 10:26 PM
2

All that shows is that insane feminists falsely use climate change to promote their own agenda. Sorry to burst your bubble but climate change is a scientific theory, been around longer than most of this intersectionality politics has, and (since you seem to care) originally discovered by male scientists.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/20 09:44 PM
1

I see I touched a nerve there asking you to back up your argument. I know you're not going to answer my original question so here's another. Care to explain how any of what I said is sexist? Or when I ever associated myself with murders? Again, please be specific. Maybe take a walk before you respond, you're getting a little too angry for somebody asking you questions on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 09:40 PM
1

Interesting, before you were an expert on rape culture, now you're an expert on my personal life. What exactly do you think is going on in my dating/sex life. Please, be specific
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 09:27 PM
1

I know that people like you only have personal insults at your disposal instead of arguments, but it still gets tiring to see you pretend to know anything about my personal life. What exactly am I doing wrong, be specific. You don't have to be bad at getting sex/dates/commitment/etc, to realise that the only thing women have to put in is time, while men have to put in money, and have more against them. (Obviously women can and do put put a lot into relationships, and obviously there are men who …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 09:25 PM
4

Ah, someone who swallowed the "rape culture" idea unquestionably I see. Even if you do actually believe that, surely you can see that every other aspect of dating/courtship is rigged against men. Edit: this fucker edited their comment after I posted to make it seem more reasonable. How about actually standing by the statement you made instead of one you did not? Stating that there are men that can't make their partners cum isn't even relevant anyway. It might be true, I don't really care; that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 06:23 PM
3

What's the context here
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 08:53 AM
1

What other sub was this posted on? I've never seen it before
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/20 08:53 AM
1

How the hell did she keep her job?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:27 PM
7

I have seen sexist men that look down on women, or even think women are inferior; but I've only ever seen women actually hate the opposite gender. I've never heard someone say that women are the cause of all problems, or a twitter hashtag (or some equivalent) of #killallwomen or #womenaretrash, but the I have seen it for men. So while I'm not a psychologist, I'd say that it's a form of feminism that causes people to truly hate an entire gender, because that's the only case where I've seen it act…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:27 PM
6

Did you respond to the right comment? What the hell does this have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:25 PM
9

Looking at examples of people who say they hate an entire gender, I have an idea. While I have seen sexist men that look down on women, or even think women are inferior; I've only ever seen women actually hate the opposite gender. I've never heard someone say that women are the cause of all problems. I've never seen a twitter hashtag (or some equivalent) of #killallwomen or #womenaretrash, but the I have seen it for men. So while I'm not a psychologist, I'd say that it's a form of feminism that …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:24 PM
9

Can you explain how prostitution is possibly legalized rape? A woman voluntarily selling sex to someone is in no way rape
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 08:01 AM
4

Yeah, that's not what they are saying at all. You're just reading what you want to read, to avoid addressing what's actually being said. This has nothing to do with women being "inheritly untrustworthy". It's the fact that a person can totally destroy your life (practically on a whim) if they decide to. The fact that it's more men worried about women is because divorce courts overwhelmingly support women, but a woman who makes more money than their husband has a lot of the same things to fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:38 AM
5

You obviously don't have good reading comprehension. You're seeing what your want to see, not what anybody is actually saying. Nobody is dating that only women about people on divorce courts. This applies to homosexual relations and the (rare) cases where a court sides with the husband. It had nothing to do with mysogyny or sexism on the part of the person that's scared. I'd be just as scared if I was tying myself to a man that could ruin my life of whenever they decided to
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:34 AM
8

Pretend what? You're confused and think that marriage is the goal. A family/sex/companionship is the goal, marriage is just a construct to make it official in the society you live in
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:23 AM
0

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 05:44 AM
9

Again, literally give me a single example other than physical strength. The double standard exists for a lot more than biological differences. Even then, in a lot of questions that involve physical strength it's not relevant. If you tell someone that they are weak, is you being an asshole dependent on the average strength of that persons gender? I'd say not a much. Telling someone they are weak for not lifting 30 kg has a lot more to due with individual circumstances than their gender. Is it ok …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 05:28 PM
9

An important thing to add of this doesn't just apply to girlfriends. Wether you're in any relationship, guy or girl, sexual or not, then treating you like trash is rarely a one time occurrence.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 05:10 PM
9

Not that strange, I see people accept being treated like trash by their gf/bf all the time
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 05:06 PM
11

How on Earth are you supposed to tell if that's a shit test, she actually wants you to back off, or just the innocent truth.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/20 05:04 PM
24

Lol, pick something other than average physical strength. r/amitheasshole has nothing to do with how much you can bench press. Give me a single practical example of when your gender would actually make a difference in a situation being an asshole or not. Like the example the post of literally talking about where a woman who wants nothing to do with her kids is says to go live her life but a man saying the same thing is told he's terrible for doing that. How does average physical strength change …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 04:05 PM
0

I never gave that number, I never said I agreed with that number, Jesus read the username
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 07:02 AM
0

Can you point to where I pulled an "80%" number out of my ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 06:24 AM
0

Where in the hell are you getting those numbers? Pulling them out your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:05 AM
5

what is r/K? It's a private sub our doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 04:00 AM
0

Did you even click on the link? It links to a comment elsewhere on this post
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:21 PM
1

Did you even click on the link? It links to a comment elsewhere on this post
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:20 PM
24

So in less flowery terms, you're agreeing with TRP ideology saying that women only care about men for what they can give them? Basically you're saying that young women are low key prostitutes, and if women don't have money they go straight to being a whore. Then as soon as they get older and have either whored themselves into the money they want, or hit the wall and can't whore anymore, they turn around and say they were oppressed and coerced into their previous situation by "society". Ignoring …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:19 PM
8

Yah, he's linking a comment from elsewhere on this post
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/20 07:17 PM
0

Errrr... Please do a little more research than linking a dankmemes post.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:45 AM
41

Haha, the clitoris is skin you fucking baboon.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:41 AM
4

Depends. Some forms of FGM include sterilization procedures, or at least cause complications. Traditionally though you are correct
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:40 AM
11

Literally every problem that FGM causes, male circumcision also causes. Yes, FGM causes it now dramatically, but literally every bullet point against FGM applies to circumcision (male genital mutilation) as well. The foreskin is part of the sex organ. It's removal: denies significant pleasure from sex; is incredibly painful; even when done "correctly" causes problems down the road, including much higher chances of chaffing and pain on the area it's supposed to cover/protect; results in the harde…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:32 AM
1

Which means they'll try even harder for such quotas to be mandatory
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 06:56 AM
7

I have to disagree. Sex work is not work, not honest work anyway. Edit: I don't only why this person deleted their comment, it was still positively upvotes and I didn't see anyone harassing them. It said something along the lines of: sex work is work, but playing a video game in your underwear is not
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 06:03 AM
30

Losers that have been conditioned by a society that demonized their sex drive so much that they actually believe they owe people money just to get a brief and counterfeit taste of someone desireing them back.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 05:53 AM
25

God I honestly can't believe nutbag feminists actually think women are at a disadvantage in today's society. Jesus, just being born a not completely ugly women and your life is so easy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 05:49 AM
41

She's mad that men aren't giving her money for existing. You know, the feminist way. "Equality"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 05:47 AM
2

I think this is a joke, but seriously prison.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 03:08 AM
2

I travel to any state. Yah no way this is real. Who's going to drive across the country for a ~$200 job?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 02:58 AM
0

Report? To who? Saying what? Is it even illegal to advertise this stuff
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/20 02:56 AM
2

who's coercing men to but nudes. You're not thinking the big picture, I'm taking about nudes/porn/prostitution. The entire "e-girl" industry is a result of societal and biological coercion of men to both both desire this form of sex and hold women on a pedestal. Just to confirm the issue is money more than morality. No, I'm saying that money is a large part of an industry being moral. As for your part, I just have to disagree completely. There are few industries in the world that are as predator…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 06:30 PM
1

Ok before I write out my response, are you a libertarian capitalist? If not, then your argument is incredibly hypocritical. Are you really saying that if a market demand is created, and people will consent to buy into the market (regardless of how they were coerced to consent), then it's ok? Because I'm getting the vibe that you don't think that's true when it impacts groups you care more about. considering drugs are illegal this is a terrible comparison. Really? So being illegal magically chang…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 08:14 AM
5

Ok, I agree that whore mongerers contribute as much to the problem as whores do. Putting all the blame on the buyer, and pretending none of it is on the seller is inane, and frankly sexist. To take an extreme example: If everyone would stop buying crack there wouldn't be a market, but only an idiot would say the dealers are blameless. Yes I totally agree the men who buy it need to stop, but saying "well men create the demand" as a response, is not only wrongfully shifting all blame; but really j…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 05:43 AM
15

... executed? Jesus you're insane
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 05:32 AM
25

And according to radical feminists somehow this voluntary, incredibly overpaid, self acclaimed whore is actually the person being oppressed here
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 05:31 AM
3

Yah it's getting worse. I don't deny that, and fuck that aspect of the future
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 12:22 AM
2

I'm just glad that most people aren't so heavily invested in the gender war as they are in this sub. If even half the population was so dedicated to gender games, or subscribed to "men are all fragile assholes, and only care about sex" or "women are all hypergamous narcissists that don't care about average men", life would suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 04:01 PM
2

I'm just glad that most people aren't so heavily invested in the gender war as they are in this sub. If even half the population was so dedicated to gender games, or subscribed to "men are all fragile assholes, and only care about sex" or "women are all hypergamous narcissists that don't care about average men", life would suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 04:01 PM
1

That is literally not even close to true. I'm not a fan of TRP, but you're so dead wrong here it's like you've never got information about TRP from anyone who believes it. TRP believes that the majority of men are "betas", and the superior man gets what they want. You're also confusing TRP with thinking women are subhuman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 05:27 AM
3

You did it first dude, I'm not even part of this but you make no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 05:22 AM
1

Really? Could you link some examples, because I don't
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 05:20 AM
3

Something to add, maybe it's not totally bad if you think of what you can bring to the relationship as a prize, but if you just think of yourself as being the prize, yes I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 05:17 AM
2

I want disagreeing with you. I'm saying that this whole sub is pretty much "can you believe this man said this! All men are hypocrites!"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 09:49 PM
1

A lot of people making this argument keep saying "they". Who? Who specifically gets so mad when women say they want attractive men, and simultaneously say they want attractive women. Not "men in general". Most men aren't like that
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 09:02 PM
1

No, they say this in general Who says this? "Men" in general? Bold assertions, without any evidence. I'm going to call bullshit. No there are not a lot of people who act like you're saying, and of those who are, they're not just men. They speak for all men No they don't, but if you're the type of person to say that in the first place there's literally no way to convince you otherwise. So I guess for anyone else reading this, that's genuinely interested in the debate: no, there is nobody in the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 08:57 PM
5

Like most of this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 08:49 PM
2

most men Doubt. Also, I don't think there are many men who thing that and also think that women having preferences is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 08:46 PM
1

Yah if the same person says both things. But I'm not surprised that you don't actually link any examples because, while these people exist, it's not like they're everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 08:36 PM
0

So are you going to admit you were wrong yet, or just Downvote and move on?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:36 PM
1

It also lists Trump as more authoritarian than Mao
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:03 PM
-2

Kind of a crappy political compass meme though. Among other things, listing trump almost as authoritarian as Stalin and Mussolini? Sanders being libertarian?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:07 AM
0

How about you actually respond to any of the comments instead of just downvoteing them and refusing to admit you were wrong? How about you actualy give a timestamp of the video for your claims? If you're being even remotely honest it shouldn't be hard at all to vindicate your assertions. The kid did nothing wrong. If you think otherwise please actualy explain what they did with a timestamp. But you won't, because you can't, because it's a lie that you're either complicit in spreading, or gullibl…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:27 PM
0

Dude seriously, respond. Give a time stamp to verify anything that you think the kid(s) did wrong. You're regurgitating the lies the media told you that were so flagrantly false that a lot of them retracted their statements and apologized within a day or so of this happening
/r/MensRights24/01/19 08:23 PM
0

The kid didn't mock the native, but hey why let facts get in your way. Edit: lol just Downvote and move on. How about you actualy give a timestamp of the video for your claims? If you're being honest it shouldn't be hard at all to vindicate your assertions. But you won't, because you can't, because it's a lie that you're either complicit in spreading or gullible enough to believe dispite all the contradicting evidence
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:29 AM
1

So you didn't watch the video. Got it. The kid didn't laugh, but nice try though. The old man told him (unprovoked, right as the old man walked up to the kids) to "go back to Europe" The other maga hat wearers weren't making fun of him either. (The kids are all in high school and probably don't even pick out their own clothes anyway) If you're to lazy to actually even do even a cursory amount of research; this is what happened: The old man walked up to the kid and started banging a drum in his f…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:28 AM
1

How the hell is saying a woman shouldn't advocate for someone to beat up a minor "alt right". The kid isn't alt right, so it sounds like you just don't know what you're talking about
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:12 AM
2

alt right piece of shit. You're a god damn liar. Seriously you should either own up to the fact you were wrong, delete this comment, or actualy provide a single source for what you're saying. The kid wasn't racist, wasn't antagonistic, wasn't a "piece of shit". The kid did nothing wrong. If you had the slightest amount of integrity you would post a timestamp of when in the video he was being racist. What actually happened was the native American approached him, banged a drum in his face, and tol…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:08 AM
2

Well he's not. A lot of the media outlets have now retracted their statements about him
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:04 AM
0

She advocating violence to a minor that did nothing wrong over some demonstrable lies that anybody who bothered to watch the video can see through. But apparently advocating for child abuse over a lie isn't bad
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:03 AM
1

the kid is a racist harrassing an old man. Lies. Provide a source. You won't because you can't, but everyone needs to know how much of a liar this guy is. Looks like you didn't bother to watch the video. You saw a bunch of lies on the media and then ignored all ofv their back pedaling and retractions about the kid. I guarantee you didn't watch the video. Seriously. Respond with a timestamp on the video of the student being either racist or harassing.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:01 AM
1

You liked what she said why exactly? An offer for a blowjob by assaulting an innocent kid is what turns you on?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:57 AM
1

Funny because even the morons who claim it exists can't actually agree to a definition of what it means, but hey just keep pulling definitions out if your ass
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:55 AM
1

hey lets start punching people for outright lies being said about them. Lets not do that. if you're offended by this post or comment then you're part of the problem
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:53 AM
1

Never mocked their culture. I'd ask you for any sort of evidence but I know you won't give any
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:51 AM
2

(((Smirking))) while someone else is telling them to go back to Europe after approaching them and banging a drum right in their face. And by smirking you mean just standing their not knowing why the hell some moron is shouting at them to leave the country and banging a drum in their face. But good god, how could they have ever had the gaul to not keep a stone face while someone approached them banging a loud instrument in their face.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:49 AM
1

How so
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:46 AM
2

It was so bad that an unrelated kid who looked like him revived death threats to his address and was doxxed
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:44 AM
1

Oh yes, because your political philosophy is so great... Oh wait
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:43 AM
2

Beating up a child for hurting your feelings. How brave
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:42 AM
1

What did the kids do? Seriously you've yet to answer except vaugely say "disrespect" with no further explanation or proof of it
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:41 AM
2

They want to push a narrative. Don't let facts get in the way
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:40 AM
1

Troll? Or seriously this stupid. Again, please state what exactly the kids ever did that was uncalled for
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:39 AM
1

Care to explain how the students were racist at all? Because it seems like you made that up. The black Israelites called the kids racial slurs, invest babies, degenerates, etc. The kids did not say racist stuff back. Wether you just swallowed the media lie unquestionably or made it up yourself, there is no excuse because there is a video proving you wrong. Then the native American walked right up to the kids, banging his drum in their face and told them to go back to Europe. Not a peace message,…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:38 AM
1

Actualy the kid stood still the native American approached him after the black Israelites also approached him. You seriously don't know jack shit about what you're talking about
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:34 AM
1

Can you just stop for a moment and bother to articulate what the kid(s) did that was actually wrong? Seriously, what did they do? Every single one of the initial accusations were proven false. Respond seriously
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:32 AM
1

And communists too right? Especially ones less than 16 years old like the one you're referring to?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:29 AM
1

Could you actually articulate what the kids did wrong? (other than wear the MAGA hat that their mom probably bought for them, because that send to be what most of this is based on) Because it REALLY seems like you didn't bother to watch the video at all. Seriously what did the kid(s) do that was even a little bit wrong?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:28 AM
5

it's insane how many people jumped on the fake news story and was calling for violence to a minor. It turbs out that none of the original accusations had any merit. Crazy world we live in
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:26 AM
3

Or you could just throw money down the toilet, but to each their own
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:24 AM
4

A minor that ended up not even doing anything he was initially accused of doing
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:23 AM
2

Gender studies is such a joke. An insult to academia
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:20 AM
2

Got it. So hot male rapists are probably fine as well in your eyes
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:19 PM
3

Sexual predators are cool if they're women apparently. Sad that some people like you actually think that
/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:43 AM
1

Not true at all. It's directly measurable, so not a social construct. Just because it isn't constant in all reference frames doesn't make it a social construct somehow
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/19 08:27 AM
1

Lol, I never "admitted to brigading", nor did I think it was a great or good thing to do. I was pointing out hypocrasy. Read my comment again, slower this time. I'm sure even someone like you can understand
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:04 AM
1

Interesting username
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 07:02 AM
13

And pretending that masculinity is somehow the culprit for not treating people well
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:57 AM
8

Something tells me that you wouldn't feel the same way if people were brigading other types of hate speech, but I suppose consistency is too much to ask from people like you
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:55 AM
22

Whoa. 700 people "brigading" a public video. What a crime
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:54 AM
50

I wouldn't say that. More like feminists are stupid as fuck or something
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:30 AM
22

Once again you're deliberately using the new definition of gender only accepted by some people, and blatantly ignoring the old and current definition that we are all still using. How you honestly think you're clever by literaly pretending we're saying things that we aren't, by redefining the words we use, is beyond me
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:29 AM
3

Neither is gender. Gender is your sex, always has been. Suddenly sine useless gender "studies" majors decided to redefine gender to mean something else, so now it's a homophone. Gender is not a social construct
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:26 AM
6

Except you literally made that up (well, some brain dead gender studies morons that you unquestionably believe anyway) gender literaly originally meant sex
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:23 AM
7

And gender is a sex, literaly in the original definition
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:22 AM
24

Gender (in the traditional sense) doesn't mean what you say at all. Traditionaly gender is a synonym for sex. It's only recently people decided to make it mean something else. So you can quit your bullshit
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/19 02:21 AM
2

Olly twice r/fuckOlly
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 10:37 PM
10

Who's saying that? More like anyone who disagrees with marxism is suddenly a facist
/r/PussyPassDenied11/01/19 10:36 PM
2

Hit them back, say that's a joke as well
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:37 PM
2

Feminists who claim to be empathetic and for gender equality don't give 2 shits about male victims. If you want your blood to boil read about the Duluth model, and how in states that implement it men are always initially arrested in domesric violence cases, even if he's the one that calls the police on a female abuser, the police are still required to arrest him
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:32 PM
23

Man abused: he deserves it. Woman abused: poor innocent victim, nothing ever could have deserved this. These people also probably call themselves non sexist. I'm sick of man hating feminist BS
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:27 PM
6

Unless you were a woman. Then he's a monster
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:25 PM
3

So I can assault anyone who is larger than me without any repercussions? And they are in the wrong if they hit back?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:24 PM
1

Of course a woman never deserves it in the mind of these retards, and only women can assault people just because they are smaller or need to vent. Sexist nonsense
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:21 PM
3

I've hard stupid crap like "we are stronger and weigh more". So I'm allowed to assault anyone who weighs more than me? What a load
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/19 09:20 PM
1

then I'm not going to change your mind. Or, you know, you could actually answer the question. I asked for evidence because I change my conclusions based on evidence, and it would be trivially easy to do what I asked, if what you're saying is true.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 07:56 PM
10

Name a single modern western feminist leader or spokesperson that fits your description of "real feminism". When the entire feminists movement doesn't consist of "real feminists", it's probably time to scrap whatever definition you think makes Someone a real feminist
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:41 PM
2

Or you could cut out the gender BS and say treat other people kindly. If you think only one gender deserves your respect, it's no less sexist if it's the opposite one or your own
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:39 PM
5

Name one modern western feminist that actually advocates for equality
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:37 PM
2

Would be better if you switched tge he/she as well instead of only the man/woman
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:17 PM
1

That's messed up
/r/MensRights18/12/18 09:34 AM
-4

I don't think either patent should have this right, it's a plain terrible idea. But you're right that there is a double standard when women have it but men don't
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:51 PM
1

What sub was this from?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/18 05:44 PM
2

But if course there are still sexist, women only success centers, women only university recruitment, women only scholarships, etc. Dispite the only gender discrimination in modern universities being against men. Don't forget all the women only hireing recruitments for jobs, and sex discrimination in the name of "diversity". But according to brainless feminists women are somehow being discriminated against in schools and the workplace, dispite the opposite being the actual truth.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:53 PM
3

Just say you're a feminist and suddenly all details become unimportant to those that claim to be on your side
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:26 AM
1

Shoot, what did it say. It's gone now
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:37 AM
1

Except that I know where the phrase " it's ok to be female" comes from, and even if it shouod be taken out if context, it's pretty clearly not for gender equality
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:23 AM
0

Bullshit. Show me a single leftist chat group that doesn't say this. Show me a single woman who says this stuff that isn't on the left. And I don't have some grudge against liberalism, you should stop pretending you can read peoples minds, you're really bad at it
/r/MensRights06/12/18 02:06 AM
2

The future is female. So only believe in each other if you're a woman
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:06 AM
1

intersectional Or white. Basically that belief is limited to women of color, or white women that properly hate their own race
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:05 AM
1

Not a trump supporter, but whatever makes you feel better buddy
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:03 AM
1

Except you have to go pretty far right of center to get the same damage as going left.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:03 AM
0

Lol, only the left that says men are trash, in which case, yes mens rights is in direct conflict
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:02 AM
2

Only white males are the butt of her ideology
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:00 AM
1

No It's far more sinister than that. It was coined to represent the radical lesbian idea of aborting 90% of all male babies
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:59 PM
6

Literally killing of baby men, the radical lesbian feminists literally wrote a book about it. If too many slipped past being aborted, they would kill them as babies
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:58 PM
3

That leaves out the critical details that it was used in her book to mean a society that aborted 90% of all male fetuses and hormonally drugged the remaining to be sex slaves
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:57 PM
6

That leaves out the critical details that it was used in her book to mean a society that aborted 90% of all male fetuses and hirmonslky drugged the remaining to be sex slaves
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:57 PM
8

No It's far more sinister than that. It was coined to represent the radical lesbian idea of aborting 90% of all male babies
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:56 PM
2

They also intend to treat that 10% with hormonal injections and basically use them as sex slaves with no say in anything important. It's not just manually aborting 90% of men. But if bring a sex slave is your thing there are legal options available to you
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:54 PM
2

It's important to know the context behind this one. It literally comes from a radical lesbian feminist stance to abort male babies so they are only about 10% of the population, and then give them hormonal treatment so they are hyper sexualized, and basically use them only for sex slaves. Seriously look this up. And this phrase was on a Google add campaign! Bring this up the next time simeone says "feminism is for equality" or some other BS among those lines.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:52 PM
1

It's still like that. 2xchromosomes, OffMyChest, feminism, and many others auto ban you just for participating in subs they don't like. As far as I know the easiest example that was big was when OffMyChest auto banned everyone from TumblrInAction
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/18 09:17 AM
2

People like this horrible person deserve life in prison.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/18 09:11 AM
1

KiA is weird. They were almost banned a while back, and they are constantly being slandered by some version of SRS or AHS. Mods decided a while ago that protecting the sub was more important than allowing for free speech and giving a platform for unrelated things that need to be said. Basically the admins won a soft victory because the mods there are to afraid to even talk about reddit in a meta way for fear of being quarantined/brigaded. It kind of sucks
/r/TheRedPill02/12/18 08:40 AM
1

You assume he was the one that killed the kid and himself
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:08 AM
1

A feminist. Don't you know, men are evil.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:07 AM
1

A feminist. Don't you know, men are evil.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:06 AM
1

Don't settle. There is nothing special about being a man, don't let the feminists bullshit get to you and think there is something special about being a woman. Don't marry someone for sex or someone doesn't respect your core values.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:06 AM
1

How about not
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:04 AM
4

No, if this story says anything it's don't get married, or at least don't compromise in your marriage. Feminists society has preached for women to be more choosy and men to settle more, for a long time. Don't marry someone who doesn't respect you and your ideals
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:04 AM
2

Doubly horrendous because he was a stay at home dad, and she worked. She should be paying him alimony. Plain sexism
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:51 AM
2

Doubly horrendous because he was a stay at home dad, and she worked. She should be paying him alimony. Plain sexism
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:51 AM
2

No It's not. It should be a percentage, but it is an arbitrary number. If you loose your job while owing alimony or child support you can go to jail for bot being able to pay
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:49 AM
1

Yes. There was a story posted here a while ago about a man who was held hostage by criminals for months. When he finally returned he was arrested on the spot for unpaid alimony and child support while he was captured and not making money. If you loose your job while owing alimony you better get the judge to hear you fast because until they drop the amount you owe (if they do at all) you're still on the hook. The alimony system is so broken and sexist.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:48 AM
2

Yes. There was a story posted here a while ago about a man who was held hostage by criminals for months. When he finally returned he was arrested on the spot for unpaid alimony and child support while he was captured and not making money. If you loose your job while owing alimony you better get the judge to hear you fast because until they drop the amount you owe (if they do at all) you're still on the hook. The alimony system is so broken and sexist.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:47 AM
1

Yes. There was a story posted here a while ago about a man who was held hostage by criminals for months. When he finally returned he was arrested on the spot for unpaid alimony and child support while he was captured and not making money. If you loose your job while owing alimony you better get the judge to hear you fast because until they drop the amount you owe (if they do at all) you're still on the hook. The alimony system is so broken and sexist.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:47 AM
3

Don't you know? Patriarchy and shit. Seriously though it's doubly bad because he was the stay at home parent, she should be paying him alimony. Pure sexism, nothing else
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:43 AM
3

The horror. A man actualy wantimg to know where his kids are? Way to aggressive. Just pay the 100% alimony and leave so we can instead call you a disinterested pig with no regard for his family. You can't win against these people, they have no concept of logical consistency except man = bad.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:41 AM
2

I bet you 100 dollars this will be removed if you post in on r/mensLib
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:39 AM
2

The alimony system is so sexist and broken
/r/MensRights02/12/18 07:36 AM
1

Excluding rape it's a choice. Not the best informed choicr necessarily, but still 100% a choice
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:25 PM
1

Found the furry
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:12 PM
1

No. That would show that men actually make less than women in that case. You can't have a well done study with a control group if it doesn't prove you right. Science is sexist you know
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:11 PM
1

Math is sexist
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:10 PM
1

So you're saying that if the pay gap isn't 50% percent it's not a problem? Don't you think any pay gap is a problem? 39% is closer to 45% than 20%. 45% is basically 50%. Pft, what don't you MRA trash understand? /s Seriously though I've heard brain dead feminists multiple times in real life say that questioning the actual size of the cited pay gap is the same thing as saying you're in favor of a pay gap if it's smaller than 40%, 33%, 20%, or whatever BS percent they keep changing.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:10 PM
1

The whole point they are trying to make is that the gender pay gap is due to sexism. This isn't an argument for that. Having a child is 100% a choice. Paid maternity/paternity leave is a different issue than claiming the gap is due to sexism, because it's due to you not being able to work, nothing to do with having breasts
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:55 PM
1

That used to be largely the case (time off to take care of children), but surveys show that more and more women are taking extended periods of time off and bot being mothers
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:52 PM
4

It's funny how feminists just add the "for the same work" despite the fact that literally every study that actually looks at men vs women that are equally qualified and doing the same work, say the pay gap doesn't exist, or is actualy against males. It's like they can't even admit to themselves how bad their arguments are, and need to lie just to sound good to themselves
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:47 PM
1

It's like that article posted here a few months ago that said women work more hours a week than men, and need more paid breaks and time off to compensate, and contradicted themselves like 2 sentences into the article when they actually gave stats on the average number of hours each gender works per week
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:43 PM
6

You realise this is crossposted from a sub about things people doubt actually happened
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:43 AM
4

You realise you're linking to a sub about things that people don't actualy believed happened right?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:41 AM
1

I'm not. In sure there are sexist individuals here who only care about mens rights, but just from commenting being here I confidently say most people are for mens rights because they are for mens rights and women's rights. If you went to ask a direct question to her, ask what exactly the MRM advocates for that's misogynistic?
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:39 AM
2

Dude it's the incels that are buying it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 01:11 AM
0

Incels.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/18 01:09 AM
46

I'm not sure how premium Snapchat works. Is this scenario wity the IRS actually possible?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/18 12:54 AM
2

I'm not sure how premium Snapchat works. Is this scenario actually possible?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/18 12:53 AM
4

Except for the gaslighting about mensLib. Pretending that sub is anything other than a man hateing cess pool
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:45 PM
2

Of course they recommend mensLib, and completely lie about it being a place to reasonably discuss mens issues. When the whole sub is built on the lie that the MRM is against women's rights, and you'll be shadowbanned just for pointing out facts, it's not a place for reasonable discussion
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:44 PM
3

Yah. Making an anonymous "someone on the internet is mean" post (with no proof it's even real, or that the person isn't being ironic, etc) seems like pretty pointless bait to me.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:36 PM
6

I wish OP would actually give a statement from someone who has an important role, or influences a large following. Just posting rate bait of some annonymous person really doesnt mean anything. We don't even know if this is real
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:34 PM
2

Esoecially because (being anonymous) we have no proof that they have any influential voice, or that it's not a false flag troll
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:32 PM
3

Yah, without actually revealing OP it's useless. You can always find someone saying stupid crap. What meters is if they are prominent figures, or have lots of support. Also, keeping posters identity a secret is a recipe for false flag attacks
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:31 PM
9

And while you can't be sure what most of them believe, all of the ones who are actually in charge of anything, are the crazy ones
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:27 PM
2

Why not?
/r/askTRP17/11/18 05:52 PM
8

They are so desperate to feel, and appear, like a hero fighting an oppressive system; that they have to make up their own enemies.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:42 PM
29

This confusion comes from people deliberately mincing definitions. You can't define feminism as wanting equality for women, then claim that modern feminists are actually feminists. By that definition I'm more of a feminist than Anita Sarkeesian. The simple fact is that with modern feminism, the women in charge frequently advocate for sexist policies, not equal or fair ones. This leads to people wasting everyone's time by switching definitions mid thought and claiming anti feminists are against w…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:40 PM
1

The second article is a double standard alone. Women shouldn't have to settle for fat guys just because they are fat. They have standards. Yet those standards can't be applied the other way? Convenient
/r/MGTOW17/11/18 01:18 AM
19

Hands on your head! Hands in the air! If your hands drop below your waist I will shoot you! Now crawl towards me! (Wait....)
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/18 12:37 AM
33

The officer gave contradictory orders that were impossible to follow
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 11:06 PM
4

Daniel shaver
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 11:04 PM
1

Damn that was over 2 years ago. I remember that story was the one what jarred me into realizing we need better police control.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 11:04 PM
5

You don't even need hypotheticals. Just watch the video if Daniel shaver. He was shot for much less
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 10:59 PM
1

Daniel shaver wasn't intimidating, and he fully complied with the cops. They still gunned him down
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 10:59 PM
3

Neither did Daniel shaver. He was compliant and much less threatening than her. He was gunned down (interestingly enough the video of shaver being shot shows another pussy pass. He was with a woman, who the cops allowed to come forward and surrender peacefully. They didn't give him the same option)
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 10:57 PM
5

Just look at the video if the police shooting Daniel shaver. Far less threatening than her, and was still shot to death
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 10:54 PM
1

Just look at what happened to Daniel shaver
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 10:53 PM
10

White Man: 50-50 % chance of being shot and killed, or just tazed and aggressively pepper sprayed. Black man: more like 90-10 % chance of Dane thing. This woman has nothing other that her female privlige to thank for being handled so gently
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 09:31 PM
3

Yah. Still would happen. Still does happen
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/18 09:23 PM
5

Falsely accused of rape by one bitch =/= justification for murder of random people. WTF is this?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:28 PM
4

Even though he was found innocent?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:25 PM
5

He can sue. That doesn't mean he would win. Court bias against men is terrible
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:24 PM
12

Also keep in mind that if she decided to go to his house and attack him (instead of making a false accusation), and he called the police on her; the deluth model would demand that the police arrest him. They would need to arrest him and remove him from the scene regardless of how clear it is could potentially be that he's the victim
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:21 PM
7

What a load of crap. If I falsely accused my friend of non-sexual assault, I would be punished. But she is a woman, so it doesn't matter
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:18 PM
17

How do people justify this? Make a false claim against someone for theft, non-sexual assault, murder, etc; you'll be punished. With this case, rape shielding laws mean that if she tried to pull this again, the future judge won't even know about her history of false accusations.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:15 PM
7

It's equal protection under the law, and modern feminists don't give a damn about it.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:12 PM
54

Courts have become so sexist, that if they rule against a woman when she's accusing a man, they feel afraid of a leading sexist to others. So if a man and a woman get in a legal battle where gender stereotypes are remotely applicable, it's a kangaroo court. I just read about a divorce case, where the wife cheated and wantee to cut all ties and leave. She didn't want to see her children or be burdened by custody or child support. The judge refused to allow the divorce to proceed in that manner. N…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:10 PM
1

Actually it's not because there is no other way humans can determine stuff like that
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:18 PM
0

The law is unconstitutional
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:10 AM
4

No you have to follow evidence. The MRM doesn't say "believe men". The only way to try and catch rapists is to follow evidence. If there is no evidence backing a claim someone is a rapist they shouldn't be punished. Same for false rape claims, you shouldn't be punished for a false claim unless there is evidence you lied
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:45 AM
4

You're absolutely wrong on your first point. To convict someone of theft they neef evidence against them. Same with any other crime. You're right about the harassment part, but other than Ford in the recent Kavanaugh scandal, (which only happened because it was politics) when does that actually happen.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:41 AM
3

Well this sub isn't. The most upvoted (or maybe 2nd most upvoted) comment on this thread is saying " I don't like Trump, but this isn't wrong". So I'm calling your bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:38 AM
6

One that has catered to much to the very radical feminists that think women can't lie
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:37 AM
2

Did the user edit the comment? It doesn't say that stuff now
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:36 AM
6

"Victims" We don't shit on victims. We require evidence, until that point they are just accusers, and even then I don't see then being "shit on" unless it's obvious they are lying, or pulling crap like blaming all men.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:35 AM
0

They aren't wrong about everything. Just a lot of things
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:32 AM
10

By the most base definition yes. But the context clearly means evidence to back your story, which requires more than your own story. Besides testimony is just about the weakest evidence out there. Even ignoring the huge problem of lying, human memory is pretty garbage when it comes to specifics or traumatizing events.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:32 AM
5

Your comment confuses me. You're making fun of the people claiming this is a Trump sub right?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:29 AM
4

Yes. I don't want to come off as uncaring or dismissive. Just require evidence for punishment, because it's important that justice is done to the right person
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:27 AM
5

I don't think (s)he's forgetting it. Just not emphasising it. There definitely exists punishment outside of court, and that should be included by the term "punishment" in the above statement.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:26 AM
1

Username checks out
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:23 AM
2

The above comment was specifically taking about outside the court of law
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:23 AM
18

Exactly. You need more evidence for more serious punishment because you need to be more certain what's true. But for just talking to people you shouldn't need much evidence unless something requires more certainty of truth.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:22 AM
21

Exactly. I want justice done and rapists punished. It's unforgivable. But, just like murder and theft, I want it done to the right people, which requires evidence
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:19 AM
6

It's being downvoted because it's not what they mean. Everyone knows Acosta didn't do anything sexual to that girl, it's the double standards that are being emphasised
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:16 AM
11

Except when it comes to privacy rights and the NSA spying on people. But the democrats didn't complain about that because that's one of the few things both parties agree on
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:14 AM
9

No one says men should be believed without evidence. I don't know where you get that from
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:12 AM
0

I know. A lot of people will reflexively go against the idea because she said it, but you have to admit that sometimes Trump has valid points, he is just a sick about it almost all the time.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:11 AM
3

Did you even read the comment? It should like this was a pre written response. I literally said that The whole reason circumcision was adopted was to reduce the pleasure of sex and to prevent boys from masturbation. I literally said that, you should really actually read the comments you argue against. The foreskin and clitorus do serve the same purpose. Maybe you can argue that the clitorus is a little more important to that end than the foreskin is, but it is entirely beside the point; the poin…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:42 PM
3

That's what I said. I accidentally typed being instead of beyond, but the sentence clearly meant the same thing
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 07:24 PM
4

The entire reason for removing the foreskin is to make it less pleasurable as well. Seriously what's your point, they serve almost the exact same purpose in multiple areas; maybe the clit is a little more important for pleasure, but that still means it's comparable and still means they serve salmost the same function.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 07:22 PM
6

How the hell does saying a baby should have the right not have a part of their body pointlessly cut off comparable to that? Now tell me, because I'm 99% sure you're a hypocrite in this regard, do you think that it's ok for parents to cut off functional parts of their baby for no reason? Are you ok with FGM, or hypothetically removing the earlobes or fingernails of a baby? If not then you're a hypocrite for thinking MGM isn't bad
/r/MensRights11/11/18 05:01 AM
1

Just make sure that it's innocent until proven guilty the other way around as well. Lack of evidence for falsification of rape should also lead to no punishment
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:16 AM
8

Ford received almost a million dollars just in money we can see, and was praised by a third of the country. Nobody that hated her has power over her. If you ignore the pros, and only focus on the cons you'll next be saying politicians are noble for standing up to slander.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:13 AM
2

You have no reason he is saying that just because she is a woman. I don't know how you have so many upvotes, but this comment is crap
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:10 AM
3

Exception caught: internalized misogony
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:08 AM
-4

Please EDIT to be people. Saying just women is deliberately sexist
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:07 AM
1

How is that full red pill? Since when does red pill mean only attributing faults to women? User is just an ass, not red pilled
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:06 AM
8

Or the person would be fired for rape accusation. Almost every week some story hits the news about a male college student being expelled or losing his job over revoked consent. People should only be punished if there is evidence that they committed the crime beyond reasonable doubt. That includes rape accusers and those accused of rape
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:05 AM
17

exactly. The accuser should only be punished if it's beyond reasonable doubt they lied. The accused should only be punished if it's beyond reasonable doubt they actually raped the person
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 03:02 AM
9

But I was told false rape accusations aren't something to worry about..... Seriously though, did she get extra punishment for this?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/18 02:59 AM
8

Such a turn for the worse by saying men should have the right to choose wether or not they want their own body mutilated...
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:37 AM
5

Baseless claim, denying reality, double standard. Check, check, and check. Pretty much your average genital mutilation defender here.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:33 AM
7

Maybe because I'm right? It serves, (like the foreskin and head of clitorus), as a cover for the tip of the genitalia, and a barrier against rashes and other things from the outside wirkd It serves as lubricating mechanism. The tip of the penis and the vagina both get lubricated by either the foreskin or head of the clit. It serves as a skin to slide on during sex to avoid chafing on the more sensitive inner part of the genitalia. Both serve as the primary pleasure sense for the genitalia. While…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 12:17 AM
8

You mean they want total control of other people's bodies; all while simultaneously fighting against others having control over other people's bodies. They don't say "do what you want to your children's body" they say "do what you want to your male childrens bodies" They simultainiusly advocate for laws against FGM, while wanting those laws to explicitly bot cover MGM.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 08:12 PM
11

Only the minority of female genital mutilation. Besides her whole point is that FGM is worse than MGM, so we shouldn't care about stopping MGM. Even assuming everything else she said to be true, that's not an argument. Stop the genital mutilation of children period. It's incredibly narrow minded and hypocritical to only care about a group that has it worse (which in this case is debatable anyway)
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:37 PM
16

Except it isn't. There are different types of circumcision. The majority of female genital mutilation is done in a way that is actually less intrusive than the common way of male genital mutilation. But just as there are worse types of FGM, there are worse types of MGM as well. Besides, the entire point of the article is to say MGM isn't bad because FGM is worse. Even assuming that's true (which is debatable), that still isn't a good argument, and still doesn't make her right. Imagine someone sa…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:35 PM
8

Or maybe it's downvoted because it has no sources and gives no reason for it to be true?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:29 PM
5

How so?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:28 PM
30

Because all of the problems with FGM also occur in MGM. The body parts removed are very similar and serve almost the exact same purpose. MGM is accepted because it is more common, and criticism of it is suppressed by religious groups (and some feminists also feel the need to suppress it for some reason.) If you're boyfriend really said that, ask him what age he was circumcised. I doubt the claim he "knows what it feels like to be circumcised" holds much water, he probably doesn't remember the ex…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:28 PM
29

Even if you were to ignore the problems with the oppositions arguments, and assume it is a fact that circumcised penises look better, are cleaner, etc; it should still be an adults decision to cut it off if they want to, not the parents of a baby or young child
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:21 PM
18

Literally every study saying foreskins help transfer aids and other STDs has been either inconclusive or rejected by the scientific community. The whole reason that myth was started is because they sampled circumcised people in the developed world, and uncircumcised people from much poorer countries. When asked to sample people with similar lifestyles they were unable to conclude the same results. By the way I like how there isn't even an apology. Just a blatant lie about feeling pleasure, then …
/r/MensRights10/11/18 04:16 PM
40

That is entirely untrue. You sound like you made that up on the spot. The entire reason circumcision even got going in America (is wasnt popular 200 years ago in America, or most of the protestant world) was to diminish the sexual pleasure, and hopefully prevent young boys from masturbation. The foreskin has almost as many nerve endings on it as the entire rest of the penis combined. Where on earth did you get that information?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:54 AM
93

The clitorus and foreskin share almost the exact same practical function, as well as being a large part if the pleasure inducing parts during sex. That is such a load of crap
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:08 AM
8

It's a parody of the historical oppression response used by some feminists to be jackasses to men
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:06 AM
6

He isn't supporting that sentiment, just saying how it will inevitably happen if male doctors take on a non-insignificant additional risk to their personal lives and Carter just by working on women
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:02 AM
10

On the flip side these hyper "all touch is rape" feminists have no problem with women touching men (particularly when the man doesn't like it). Think about it. When was the last time a women ever asked to touch you, or explicitly ask you to escalate a sensual encounter?
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:00 AM
36

What particularly enraged me is how feminists protested the idea of them being included in the draft, yet tried their hardest to shame men into going to die for a pointless war they couldn't have possibly thought was actually for any good cause. Evil
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:56 AM
2

I really hope this doesn't become a standard type of post for this sub. This is shit
/r/MensRights04/11/18 10:39 PM
23

It's like the post about the flier saying 1/4 of the homeless are women, so donate to help those women. Some people genuinely only care about problems if the victims are a demographic they like.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 10:37 PM
1

They really are the minority. Jus look at the the votes with people who agree vs those who disagree.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 06:30 PM
1

You don't need to resort to hypotheticals. Just look at Russia. After the revolution was won there were dozens of different progressive, liberal, socialist, communist, anarchist etc; groups with a decent presence. They were censored, exiled, gulag-ed, and killed.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 01:29 AM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if a few people were hurt by the message that male victims don't matter, but they will walk it off. There is a difference between not being hurt, and tolerating hurt.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 01:20 AM
3

The white feather is only given out by people who aren't fighting themselves. Think for a bit about the hypocrasy required there.
/r/MGTOW03/11/18 07:34 PM
4

The white feather is only given out by people who aren't fighting themselves. Think for a bit about the hypocrasy required there.
/r/MGTOW03/11/18 07:33 PM
4

u/Sol_install
/r/MGTOW03/11/18 07:28 PM
15

r/menKampf points out just that
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:36 AM
2

r/menKampf
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:35 AM
13

Which if people actually bothered to look they would see that's a stupid comparison (jews=Nazis because reasons) But I guess if people looked closely the main stream media couldn't exist as they do now
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:34 AM
6

I posted the article here about the feminist mom trying to kick the young boy off the public playground, wondering what their position was. They removed it because apparently the mom "nicely asked" them to leave, and my title saying "tried to kick out" was apparently misleading and hateful.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:28 PM
2

They said they removed it because it "falsely" said they tried to kick the boy out, when apparently the feminist mother "nicely asked" them to leave. I asked them how they knew that, and that if the reverse had happened they wouldn't be nit picking the tone of voice of the misogynist. They didn't really answer.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:24 PM
3

Ok now your clearly a troll
/r/MensRights01/11/18 06:14 AM
29

iTs OkAy WhEn wE dO iT. ©
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:16 AM
7

It's so obviously a false flag. It's probably already on r/againstMensRights. They really have no idea how to challenge our arguments, only make strawmans
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:13 AM
3

I posted this on r/mens_lib, wondering what their stance is. Of course they removed it
/r/MensRights01/11/18 05:11 AM
2

It's totally ridiculous they exist. Literally against men having rights but that's A okay for the admins
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:45 AM
3

And so blatantly false is assanying
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:07 AM
1

Why I'm no longer a feminist? With a specific topic like that bring up how feminists degrade men, more than specifically mens issues. Look at the source reddit originally gave for "positive masculinity" as an alternative to r/TheRedPill. And how it said male abuse victims should stay quiet so they don't detract from women's issues. Mention how feminists fight against movements to create male, or gender neutral, domestic abuse centers, dispite men being 40% of abuse victims (as a low estimate). O…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:05 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:25 AM
1

Any short clips of it? The whole podcast is a lot if time to dedicate
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:29 AM
19

Is this group of women really protesting having the same retirement age as men? But feminism is about equality if course /s
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:28 AM
1

I got banned for asking them (on a post that literally said men should quit complaining about their problems because slut-shaming exists) why so many feminists have to ignore or downplay mens issues.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:26 AM
2

Yah. There was an article here just last week about how Canada deemed female pedophiles to be "non-dangerous" because there were (allegedly) less of them. This downplaying of female sex offenders is so infuriating.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:23 AM
3

It's almost as if they seem to have an agenda to push
/r/MensRights31/10/18 12:59 AM
3

...Maybe they leaked them by subscribing the news on leeks, and serving it in peoples salads... Or I just don't know how to spell. You never know
/r/MensRights29/10/18 07:15 PM
7

r/TheRedPill was civil, didn't dox, didn't break site rules, etc. It was purely a political quarantine. They even posted an alternate source for "real positive masculinity". The source was by a guy so disgusting, he said male victims of domestic abuse shouldn't recieve attention, or news, because it detracted from women's domestic abuse help. He also said similar things about false rape accusations and suicide. Reddit took down the degrading link, only after it was pointed out that the guy in qu…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:09 AM
1

That's obscene
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:44 AM
5

You can try, but mens rights has a negative knee jerk response other places because it's been falsely and disingenuously associated with misogony and male supremists. I've tried elsewhere, but it doesn't seem to get much attention.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:39 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:36 AM
26

The article really hits it in the head when it says that none of the evidence he has gathered for his innocence will change the mind of those who already think he is guilty. The information leaked to the public consisted only of partial truths, biased snippets of testimonies (which already treated Krauss as guilty), and ignored any statement or fact that was in Krauss's defence. The status quo, and way this was leaked, makes it impossible for Krauss to defend his reputation. The events have next…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 02:34 AM
1

That's literally not true. Unless you edited the link afterwards it was just a stupid Google image search that didn't even bring up anything. Seriously, actually link some of these alleged posts if you want anyone to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:39 PM
2

It's funny how you provide a link (which is literally just a Google search) and think nobody will actually click on it? Like the fact you put a url in your comment was enough to convince people it was actually evidence? Nothing showed up. Not a single post here about jew hating in that Google search. I would say that: just because one out of a thousand coments might be a (downvoted) anti Jew comment, doesn't mean anything. You actually need to show an upvoted post/comment to prove your point. Bu…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:15 AM
2

Begone troll. Nothing you've said is true. If you would actually care to link some evidence for your claim... But you won't. You've been asked before, but you can't, because there isn't any.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 04:40 AM
3

A man needs a name
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/18 04:57 PM
1

Funny how you added the downvote edit while you're still positive.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:58 PM
2

Yah I'm sure your a lawyer, the guy who says mens rights is a euphemism for white nationalism and Jew hating...
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:49 PM
2

Care to actually link these posts? The only posts about Jews I've seen on this sub have been strictly in regards to circumcision, and how (just like the law protects child FGM, even if the parents want it for religious reasons) their religion shouldn't give them an excuse to mutilate babies. But you've already been asked for sources by others, so I assume you're not actually going to back up your claim here either.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:45 PM
3

Almost like what you said is utterly false and you ignore our calls for you to give any evidence.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:49 AM
2

Mens rights somehow equals white nationalism. You skipped a few steps please show your work
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:47 AM
1

The fact this could actually happen really infuriates me
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:45 AM
1

If that happened feninists would call discrimination and blame the patriarchy
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:40 AM
1

Hate is only bad if it's being done by someone they don't like
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:37 AM
1

They try to save their narrative. Don't officially alienate anyone so they can always claim to not support crap if it gets to much bad publicity
/r/MensRights23/10/18 12:36 AM
7

In the meantime if a woman has sex with a minor, and it's situatory rape, he's still on the hook for child support, but these women can't comprehend being held accountable for their own actions
/r/MGTOW22/10/18 04:20 AM
18

Why * womans * with astrics
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:15 AM
3

Are you kidding? What makes you think that. She is practically a card carrying SJW.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:50 PM
6

They already compartmentalized it. To quote someone in the blackPeopleTwitter post about this "yah, black men face false accusations all the time, like Emmit Till. White men go around rapeing people consequence free and use this as justification to ignore victims" The doublethink is strong over there.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:49 PM
3

It was all over r/politics, twitter, twoXchromosomes, etc
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:46 PM
0

He only lied about things that didn't directly have to do with the sexual assault case.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:45 PM
13

I even saw a stupid comment over there saying "this strengthens the reasoning for believe women, false accysations are taken down in a heartbeat" it doesn't take much searching to find senarioes where false accusations actually distroy lives (or much critical thought to realize this case means the exact opposite) The double standards and doublethink are absurd.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:44 PM
52

The comments over there turn to crap so quickly. "This shows we live in a scary time for men /s" and "white men can rape consequence free" People see stuff like this and deliberately try to twist the narrative to suggest false accusations aren't a problem
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:57 PM
15

Just ask a feminist these 3 questions when they attempt to spread their BS to unaware bystanders, as if they are loving and logical: 1) How do they feel about how almost all domenstic abuse centers (many if which my tax dollars go to) don't allow adult men in, even if they are victims. How if a man is abused by a woman and calls the police, he is more likely to be arrested than helped when they show up. Include how almost all dometic abuse/rape victim hotlines will also deny service a victim if …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 10:55 PM
4

The suggested title still fits that description. Feminism is more like astrology and mysticism than a solidified religion or cult.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 10:12 PM
25

A recent study showed that Nazi propaganda is literally indistinguishable from feminist talking points. They published sections of mein kamp, written in intersectional (instead of facist) lingo (replace Jews with men, Aryan with women, etc) and feminist journals not only published it, but acclaimed it.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 10:10 PM
28

Yah, until their sex drive dies down for the month, and then they claim you raped them. Happens all the time at college campuses, and with anyone that has a high status job.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 10:05 PM
4

It also has a very us against the world mentality. You're either with or against them, and if you aren't with them you are filth. It's not a surprise that oeople only join the feninist cult by indoctrination, as they are so hostile to anyone else
/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 10:02 PM
11

Sounds like a bot. Thanks for putting up with these people for us.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/18 10:19 PM
13

Was this really the first response? Weeks of appealing and one BS, 3 sentence, vague dodge of a response?
/r/TheRedPill15/10/18 07:14 PM
14

This, pared with the post just a few days ago about a woman falsely accusing a 9-year old of sexual harassment, are pretty good examples of how the #believeWomen thing is such nonsense
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:05 PM
12

The racism and sexism against whites and men in the circles of people who #believeWomen is insane. Literally no reason to believe white men rape women on an industrial level.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:03 PM
45

No, the two reasons your accusations won't be taken seriously are: 1) you're a male. 2) she is a female
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:01 PM
4

The matriarchy is a real thing. Women are often seen as innocent regardless of what they've done
/r/MensRights15/10/18 07:00 PM
3

Well duh, black people can beat box and rap circles around normies. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:58 PM
11

Past people of every race and gender did horrible things. Somehow that justifies sexism and racism today?
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:56 PM
10

Probably will only get a minimal punishment (if at all), she is a woman.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:54 PM
30

Press releasing the name/address etc of people they don't like is a real problem
/r/MensRights15/10/18 06:53 PM
3

Not that I don't agree with most of the sentiment here (I do, I hate people that user their children like this) but what does this have to do with MGTOW?
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 04:01 PM
1

From a sexist perspective? It only applies to men. Women aren't required to sign up for the draft; men can't vote, loose any welfare benefits, and potentially can be jailed; if they don't sign up. From my political position Being required to sign their bodies and lives away to the government if they ever decide to call upon them, without mutual consent, to fight in a war that the said citizen doesn't have to be in support of, is evil to me.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:37 AM
1

Would make it easier to fight for them though.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:54 PM
2

How exactly does the government take credit for any of that? Especially the newer sjw government that is running California into the ground? Looked at any recent trends regarding the population and economic forces leaving California?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:05 AM
16

Affirmative action is a joke. I hope the Asian advancement groups suing universities right now, successfully take it to the supreme court soon and do away with it
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:02 AM
5

Still stupid affirmative action nonsense, but if they said no single-gender boards at least they whould be consistent
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:00 AM
61

I think at this point the equal rights amendment would do men more good than women. Let us challenge sexist laws and policies like affirmative action, the draft, the Duluth model, gender quotas (laws like this), rape laws/rape definition, the right to decide if you want your genitals mutilated after you're an adult, anti-misogony laws with no anti-misandry counterparts, paternity care, divorce procedures, women only hireing programs, woman only domestic abuse centers/drug recovery clinics/etc...…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:54 AM
10

Does it also require men sit on boards with only women? No. No it doesn't
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:44 AM
1

I have to say I don't have a great response to that other than that my skin crawls when thinking of stories you might see on r/snowden
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 07:40 AM
1

How so?
/r/MGTOW08/10/18 07:39 AM
1

Sure buddy. I believe you
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:11 AM
5

I legitimately think it's a possibility it's just a distraction.
/r/MGTOW07/10/18 07:41 AM
3

How exactly do you plan on that going down in any possibly good way?
/r/MGTOW07/10/18 07:19 AM
17

He has really lax views on the 4th amendment, and supports the patriot act and mass surveillance. You didn't hear this in the news because it's one if the few things politicians from both major parties agree on.
/r/MGTOW07/10/18 07:18 AM
2

No matter Who you vote for (that has a chance if winning anyeay) is a vote for big brother. The dems could have easily arose concern about Kavanaugh if they brought up his views on privacy and the patriot act. They didn't because that is one of the few things there is bi-partisan agreement for among politicians.
/r/MGTOW07/10/18 07:16 AM
3

Read an actual primary source for once. During the therapy session she never mentioned Kavanaugh by name
/r/MensRights06/10/18 08:34 PM
5

Didn't mention Kavanaugh by name previously
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:11 PM
18

Gee someone else was sexist against women? How dare I say women shouldn't be allowed to ruin an unrelated, innocent mans life. The horror
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:07 PM
1

Be nice if you actually linked the article instead of just a picture of the headline
/r/MGTOW05/10/18 03:11 AM
5

How is dancing disrespectful? He wasn't air humping, he was flossing, literally just dancing
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 11:08 PM
3

He was flossing, literally just dancing
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 11:07 PM
2

Anyone know if there was any context, or if something happened about this afterward?
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 11:06 PM
2

I think that would red pill more feminists than anything else, witnessing the crap in a society that blames all its problems in one gender, fail so badly.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:56 AM
2

Good old KiA, I wish the sub was as active as it used to be
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:54 AM
3

Damn this was one if the most frightening and eye opening comments I've read here. That also leads me to believe there is no chance they aren't putting plants and other fake influences here and related subs as well.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/18 07:14 AM
2

Wow, that's a really nice phrase when people redefine words, but expect them to still incite the same reaction. I'm definitely going to start using it.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/18 06:59 AM
2

You weren't. I had briefly viewed this place before, but when it was quarantined I took a good look at it, and subscribed. I think I belong here.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/18 06:52 AM
1

Holly crap. That jackass is so full of shit. In the interview he flat out lied and said mens rights activists want to define and abolish all domestic abuse centers.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/18 06:26 AM
6

I don't get it, if you're going for pictures anyway there is more free porn on the internet than you could watch if it was your full time job. Not only is it pathetic, but giving these girls validation for what they do will only make it harder for these males to have real sex without giving their life savings to some undeserving whore.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/18 08:12 PM
29

That is one of the best things I've heard all week. Hilarious
/r/TheRedPill30/09/18 08:09 PM
0

White knight ran in to help after he threw one punch. Still hit her less than she hit him
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/18 12:50 AM
24

I personally don't believe it, but that should be irrelevant. There is no evidence against him except for her testimony (which is full of holes and is suspicious.) Any and all actual evidence is either neutral, or points to him not doing it. Yet people want this to disqualify him solely because of this. It is a big example of how due process, presumption of innocence, and even basic fairness; are thrown out the window when it comes to men and sexual assault/rape cases.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:45 PM
9

She was literally assaulting him and he was just taking it, expecting her to stop it someone to see how crazy she was. He threw one good punch in self defense and the bystandard (who I guess was just eating popcorn before) decided that finally something worth breaking up was happening.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 06:15 PM
13

Doesn't mean it's okay that we are just expected to take it with no reprimand or justice
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 06:12 PM
2

Notice the white knights just stood by while she attacked him, only when he retaliated did they feel the need to intervene.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 06:08 PM
5

Notice the white knights just stood by while she attacked him, only when he retaliated did they feel the need to intervene.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:08 PM
1

Darn. Any way you could PM me them? I'm genuinely curious. All the posts there right now are about the quarantine and I don't know where to find posts that really made the sub what it was
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 10:15 PM
2

This is such gross hypocrasy. Woman cries = how beutiful. Man cries = wimp, probably just doing it for the camera lol
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:25 AM
2

None. They use these events as an excuse to increase the rate if censorship, but they won't back down unless they encounter extreme resustance. It took the whole site working together to get Pau (Pao? I'm on mobile, hard to checj) To step down and stop censoring so hard. They are coming for free speech more intelligently now; slowly and with more accusations of being related to doxing, racism, etc
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 08:10 AM
2

No just quarantined (for now)
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 08:07 AM
1

We kind of are with mens rights. We believe men aren't (or at least shouldn't be) disposable pawns of social warfare.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 08:06 AM
1

I didn't get the chance to look much at TRP when it was in good standing. Do you mind linking me a few posts from there that you think newcomers should see? Scrolling top of all time, I don't think I'm getting a whole lot out if it.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 07:47 AM
3

The other subs at least had the excuse of "hate speech" racism, disturbing content, etc. But TRP had none of that. Pure ideological propaganda. (Also, the replacement info they want people to read instead is basically how men can live to serve women, written by a gender studies major who was themselves accused if sexual misconduct)
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:35 AM
19

Written by someone who majored in gender studies and conveniently accused of sexual misconduct himself
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/18 06:26 AM
1

Crap, I feel like I just scrathed the surface of this sub and haven't really learned anything from here yet. Now it might not stay up longer. Can anyone who has been here a while put together a list of posts that are the best for newcomers to read? It's not hard to archive them after that.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 06:10 AM
5

If the hearing means anything, staying away and not touching them still won't keep you safe
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 12:13 AM
0

Because Russia is so alt right... They really aren't alt right anyway, anything actually alt right is against the rules. Really have you ever taken a single look at T_D? Or maybe you just have no idea what alt right means...
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:16 PM
5

I don't understand the point of your comment.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:12 PM
6

It was posted here first actually (more than once) before bring posted to T_D. For some reason OP crossposted from there rather than here, even though it is in the top 20 of all time here
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:08 PM
1

Why did it get banned?
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 10:19 PM
3

Not that I like republicans that much, but definitely the better of the only two parties with a chance. Just the smug feeling I got when all of the fake news, SJW, PC, censorship crowd got slammed by Trump won the presidency, was enough to distract me from how much I don't like Trump.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 09:48 PM
3

Serena Williams gets called out by an umpire fair and square, now (because she is a black woman and rules shouldn't apply to her), people are getting mass banned from Twitter, for being objective about it, and reddit is attempting to go back to (further than?) Ellen Pau level censorshio. Most immature athlete of the year.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 09:29 PM
1

r/itsokaytobewhite
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 09:18 PM
3

/r/shitpoliticssays? So pointing out ridiculous arguments popular on censored reddit is now hate?
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 09:02 PM
1

That's what I'm thinking. I actually hope the bannout is enormous, and causes most people who don't drink sjw cool aid to leave.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:52 PM
1

Cringe anarchy is one if the few subs I enjoy where I also hate a non-insignificant part of it. Chalk full of BS, it's also one of the last places to adress tabu topics, as well as host free conversation (and good humor) on reddit.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:47 PM
3

Silly men, thinking they should have rights.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:42 PM
1

That's why in libertarian. I only currently see the left as more dangerois because the radical right has little power. Wasn't true 80 years ago? Stop the government if power and you don't have to worry as much about which leader is slightly more tolerable.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:39 PM
2

Don't forget the fun unlessness as well
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:31 PM
1

I don't like a lot of what they say, but they do hit the nail on the head with a lot of stuff. If your concerned about what is truth, then you shouldn't use ad hominem. Something is either true or false regardless if who it is that says it.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:14 PM
1

Credit where credits due, I don't like a lot of what they say there but some things they hit right on the head, and I saw it there first.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:03 PM
1

What's funny is people are advocating for women to get even less time. Like the UK that's toying with not imprisoning women for non-violent crime at all (men if course, will still be locked up for non-violent crime)
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 10:51 PM
47

https://www.wlky.com/article/woman-kills-husband-at-walmart-in-front-of-3-children-police-say/23062065
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:35 PM
9

Convienient that misandry won't be classified as such.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 04:53 PM
7

That's an important detail
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/18 08:13 PM
1

Foo
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:04 PM
6

The shop was also ordered to pay one euro to the institute for equality between women and men. Is that a typo, or did they really make them pay 1 euro for some reason?
/r/MensRights01/09/18 04:22 PM
24

Yah, it's crazy that people like this see the fact thst people want childrens body to remaining intact until they're old enough to make in irreversible decision themselves, is somehow: -A gendered issue. -A non issue because other people have their lives worse (which itself is wrong because a lot of female circumcision really isn't worse than male circumcision anyway) -Granting male children an unfair "privilege" to have a "my body, my decision" right, when it really only effects themselves; whi…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:25 PM
7

This reply loos like it was written by a badly designed bot or a really drunk person. Or just a make exclusionary feminist.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:15 PM
28

While true, that's not even a good example anyway. Female genital mutilation is only viewed as much worse than male genital mutilation because its less common. Really its like an arm cut off vs a leg cut off, not an arm and a finger.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:12 PM
1

Do we know why they are blocked in the first place?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/18 07:17 PM
12

If a woman can unilaterally decide to end a pregnancy without the fathers consent, and just decide to no longer be a mother, then a man should be able to unilaterally decide not to be the father. The same time frame that abortion should be legal is the same time frame that men should be able to decide against being responsible for the child. EDIT: This is a hypothetical, I don't think either parent should be allowed to bail without a moments notice, but equal rights means if you give freedom to …
/r/MensRights06/07/18 08:42 PM
1

This is already near the top of all time on this sub. Why are we reposting it?
/r/MensRights28/06/18 07:29 AM
1

No, that's about as irrelevant as your other comment. Other user posted an irrelevant and usless article, you responded with worthless comments and untrue statements. Hence you're both dipshits
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/18 12:52 PM
1

Seriously they are painting this like its a bad thing evil men are getting alimony as well
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/18 11:33 AM
1

No I really do think false accusations are worthy of being on the list, not watered down at all
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/18 11:27 AM
1

Wow, you both are dipshits.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/18 11:12 AM
5

Yah, you can definitely get around the PIN, and some vendors don't even ask for your zip if you run it as credit (for small amounts) the picture was likely a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/06/18 07:14 PM
8

I assume other individuals are still going on the wall, only white men are being removed
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:30 PM
2

Except for the last part of what she said "as women"
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:39 PM
5

What sub was this on where a post like that gets upvoted, but the comment got downvoted?
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:38 PM
1

How about /r/feminism ?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/18 02:58 AM
1

Now I don't even know what to believe
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 10:41 PM
18

Yes, its people who think that child predation is ok.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:10 AM
108

"Caught orally pleasuring a student" For Gods sake, if the genders were reversed all he'll would break loose. Imagine if they said a male pedophile was "pleasuring" his rape victim.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:08 AM
1

Your wording with the title if this post is...wierd
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:38 PM
1

He is kind of like ben shapiro in that regard. He makes good arguments until religion comes up, then rational argument is out the door.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:02 PM
2

Wrong sub
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:00 PM
1

Surprise, he wasn't. We're pretty logical here
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:16 PM
1

Because screw evolution and biology. We don't need men...
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:00 PM
1

How are INCELS s men's right thing? How is murdering generic people because you're mad good? How is accusing the entirety of the opposite gender of being evil because you're involentarily celebate good? Sure they actually focus on some of the male prejudice in society that most ignore, but rarely in a constructive, or even a fair, way. /r/incels literally called for violence against men who weren't virgins, and all women.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:39 PM
21

You forgot the part about sleeping around, that women who are sexually active with multiple people or are prostitutes (oh, I mean sex workes) are just fine. Don't slut shame them. Also feminists: men who look at multiple women are pigs. Male prostitutes are jokes, (doesn't stop them from watching it). Fat women need to be respected for their body, if you don't pretend fat women are healthy and find them attractive (which is involuntary) you're an ass. Also feminists: I'm plus size, not blind, do…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:13 AM
1

What the hell?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/18 05:48 AM
1

The boy looks like a minor as well, its child abuse both ways by your lack of logic
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/18 05:35 AM
1

Those punches clearly were not doing any damage, they were just causing discomfort...
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/18 05:34 AM
1

Your downvotes are because that's already been stated in the comment thread, and you posted without reading already posted comments btw
/r/MensRights07/04/18 08:00 PM
1

I think he just missed the point
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:56 PM
1

Stating a fact (40% of domestic violence is against men) is not wrong in any way. Because most of us here are actually pro equal rights, the point of stating that fact is to say men hurt as well as women. Saying that statement is anti men, because it shows the truth that the majority of (reported) domestic abuse is directed toward women, is fallacious. We don't need to compromise women's rights to treat men fairly, (or vice versa). Saying that it is anti women would be misreading it as well, it …
/r/MensRights07/04/18 07:33 PM
1

Its not an issue they support women's day, its if they are sexist against men. Somehow I doubt pornhub is.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:47 AM
2

*college's. How does this relate to the picture at all? What the hell do 'safe spaces' have to do with prejudice? What does this post even mean?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:44 AM
2

This is so disgusting
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:24 AM
1

What is this from
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:41 PM
1

'The conviction rate it 60%, how did it get so bad that it's down to 20%! I mean what kind of ststem do we have where only 3% are convicted' EDIT: Play on old joke "can I have 10 dollars? 5 dollars what do you need 2 dollars for!?"
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:17 PM
1

No, this is not that case. Watson stole data from Franklin, and even admitted he had done so after the fact. He even said she should have received more credit than she did, and that she was more valuable than Maurice Wilkins. (the third and often forgotten nobel prize winner for discovering DNA, might have spelled his name wrong...)
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:36 AM
1

What does this have to do about feminism? Watson stole data from Rosalind Franklin, and even admitted he had done so after the fact. Even he said she should have received more credit than she did, and that she was more valuable than Maurice Wilkins. (the third and often forgotten nobel prize winner for discovering DNA, might have spelled the name wrong...)
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter