TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

slowpokesardine Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by slowpokesardine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Some women are delusional. They feel they are at the center of the universe. Bitch, no one cares about you. Go drown yourself in Cheetos dust
/r/MensRights30/07/22 01:39 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 02:07 PM
6

My white mom was concerned when I was dating a black man. It's the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 06:07 AM
8

I'm doing just fine
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 01:11 AM
5

Why?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 06:21 PM
7

I'm glad you followed my instructions and calmed down.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 04:13 PM
10

Calm down. Genital mutilation is wrong.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 04:05 PM
1

You mean circumcision? Or your glans penis itself?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:56 PM
-20

What mutilation did they do
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:33 PM
1

I thought there's an entire term coined to represent girls who are attracted to intelligent men called sapiosexual
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 07:52 PM
1

What's high n
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 08:31 PM
1

B face, friendly, happy, energizing, positive personality. Can handle a joke. Smiling face is resting face. Loud laugh, hygienic. As a guy, that's all I really care about. Body shape, waist, hair color, height, etc don't matter nearly as much for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/21 07:31 AM
1

No one said it isn't infallible. Youre incompetent to not understand though.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 11:20 PM
25

Another naysayer. Sigh. For the field of "Science of Science" which is the overarching field this specific study belongs to, nature comm is a very prestigious journal. Note that sci of sci is almost a social science. How many social science papers do you see in nature comm? Certainly a fraction relative to STEM based papers. Typical journals in this field have an impact factor of less than 2. Nature comm has an IF greater that 12. So publishing this paper in this journal is no small feat. "so an…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:42 AM
9

I'll largely ignored your personal attacks on me considering they are a byproduct of your personal and political opinions. After reading your response one thing is clear, you are not from the field this specific study belongs to. Given that you aren't an expert in this area, it's hell of an arrogant thing to point out flaws, based on your non-specialist training and knowledge, in a study that has been reviewed and approved after multiple iterations, by four hand-selected experts in the specific …
/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:36 AM
14

I know the difference between nature and nature comm. Stop getting triggered and ignoring my key word "probably" when I called it prestigious, just to twist my words and make your point. For the field of "Science of Science" which is the overarching field this specific study belongs to, nature comm is a very prestigious journal. Note that sci of sci is almost a social science. How many social science papers do you see in nature comm? Certainly a fraction relative to STEM based papers. Typical jo…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:38 AM
15

Before I answer, let me provide a qualifier not to brag but to illustrate that I kind of know what I'm talking about: I am a PhD and a first author of 25 plus papers and another 25 coauthored papers. I am also very familiar with this field, this journal, and academia. Having said that, no study, is perfect. Research is an ongoing process. If the most prolific and iconic papers are pulled from the archives, they have errors and contradictions. Some conclusions have outright been refuted in newer …
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:12 AM
77

Ironic, the lead author is a woman. Respect to her for going against the grain and taking the risk initiative of backlash to discuss a controversial topic. Sad that the social justice worrier types shut down this opportunity to debate and seek the truth.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 07:37 AM
10

Nature communications is a reputable journal and probably one of the most prestigious. This also means it has a rigorous peer review process as is typical for prestigious journals. Clearly this paper's conclusions were sufficient to go through this rigorous process of peer review from experts in the field. Hence, it's acceptance. It was the uproar that led to the retraction of the study.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 07:23 AM
40

What's really sad is this is one of the most prestigious journals and with a proportionally rigorous peer review process.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 07:04 AM
13

Why am I this enraged!!?!
/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:31 AM
13

Hiring should be based on merit regardless of genitalia
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter