TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

smariroach Archive

View 1 post and 42 comments by smariroach on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

smariroach/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:33 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

well yes, just explaining that the example you responded to was meant to explain why why "it's biology" isn't a meaningful argument, rather than claiming it's exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 08:09 PM
2

“It’s evolutionary” doesn’t take away the fact that it’s predatory for a much older man to be chasing after very young women but it's not inherently predatory. It’s also just incredibly sexually objectifying to just see women as having value on the basis of their looks and their fertility sure, but I think you'll find very few who see women's value as "just" looks and fertility, as opposed to a variety of characteristics where those two are included. How much value these get (especially looks) w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:40 AM
1

where shorter men argue that it should not matter if that were to be put into the same way age difference is discussed, it would be short men saying that it's actually a moral failing to date tall men
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 09:31 AM
2

it's not the same thing, but it's used yo illustrate the point that something being natural adds neither positive nor negative moral value to it. Many behaviors are natural, yet suppressed in our society because they negatively impact the world we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:37 AM
1

Did SpongeBob teach you marine biology? That's not the right comparison. An equivalent comparison would be "did spongeBob teach you what people find funny" Again, it'snot about what the character likes, but that the audience like it. And when I claim that porn tags showed me that men want psycho clown bitches, then men suddenly have an attitude and say thats inaccurate. I don't know how prevalent "psycho clown bitches" are in porn, butit seems unreasonable to assume people search for that in por…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 02:40 PM
1

Your base premise here seems to be that guys think women like powerful dominant bad boys because a character in 50 shades does, which means you missed the point. Setting aside whether 50 shades is evidence of anything or not, the point that is often made is that what shows women are attracted to such men is how immensly popular that story is with women, and that it's a story whose only draw is romance/sex appeal. That is not learning from the fiction of the characters in the story, but from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:02 AM
1

Can be, but it's clearly not every abuser. Good all "fish are wet, not all wet things are fish"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 09:49 PM
0

A great example of bias, thank you. "Unless women are actively trying to find men that are specifically poor, to the extent of using homeless shelters as a dating service, they obviously care about money above all else"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 05:29 PM
1

That's a lot of words just to say "i have anecdotal evidence and a pre-existing bias"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 04:47 PM
1

Hard disagree, as would most women, and I'll be pretty surprised if you can back that statement up with any data. What is paramount is fitness in the sense of "survival of the fittest" and that manifests in many ways, usually (since we're taking the animal behavior path) showing ability to provide resources trumps literal stockpiling, things like being strong (must be able to aquire enough calories to maintain strength) and intelligence. You can't claim resources as the primary animal drive reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 02:14 PM
1

So what you're saying is that women are unreasonable because they'd like to be able to get top tier men, and that's not good for you because you want a top tier woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 10:46 AM
1

You're defining women as "gold diggers" simply by virtue of more money being more desirable then less money. Using that definition you are certainly correct, but it also means that the whole "beta-bux" point is meaningless. You might as well say "beta-attractiveness" or "beta-humor" or any other of the many factors that matter to women when finding a mate, since nobody is perfect and every relationship is a "settlement" on one front or another. The fact that money is the characteristic chosen to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 07:10 AM
4

This seems to be mostly a insecurity issue you have. Relationships, at least for anyone with a bit of maturity, don't have to be with tje most attractive person you've ever had sex with to not be somehow degrading to your partner. I'm married, I am attracted to my wife. That doesn't mean she's the most attractive woman I've slept with, and she doesn't need to be. For people who consider themselves to be "red pilled" there are a lot of them that have a sadly naive romantic ideal of what relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:26 PM
1

Sure it does. The comment about the apparent "hypocrisy" was in response to talking about women that behaved in a way that is pretty contrary to many feminist views, but there was nothing to suggest that those women subscribe to the feminist views in question. It's like if someone stated "many men think it's wrong to kill a person under any circumsrances" and someone replied with "men don't think you should kill others but men also kill others! Make up your mind!" Like, these are probably not th…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 09:37 AM
1

Maybe because there's no indication that the women that were being discussed held both views?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/10/20 08:29 AM
0

Many women buy this book Based on nothing.. It's barely a real book.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:12 PM
2

a made up person
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:07 PM
1

Lets not base out opinion on women to much on those insecurities.. 11 y/o girls are not exactly representative for women.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 11:43 AM
1

Why is it her right and his responsibility to have an unwanted child? I suppose because it can't be the choice of both, and undeniably it effects the woman more than it does the man, since the man can still choose to have nothing further to do with the child beyond some cash-money.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:51 PM
0

or if they had some other magical thing, like maybe a thin layer of latex to catch the sperm
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:55 PM
1

I don't think the comment was about ACA, but about socialized healthcare in general. What happened when people tried to create that in the USA is a very specific case, and not very relevant to the basic idea of taxpayer funded healthcare.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:23 PM
2

It didn't say "when they didn't want to", but was pretty damn clear that you were "using or threatening to use physical force (twisting their arm, holding them down, etc.) if they did not cooperate?" How is that not clear?
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:30 PM
3

This is because hypergamy predisposes them to be attracted to (and thus enable the procreation of) evil men while being unattracted to (and thus prevent the procreation of) good men. Anyone who prefers to bring more evil men and fewer good men in the world is evil herself. How is this? In what way does it predispose them to be attracted to evil men and unattracted to good men? And even if that were the case, "evil" and "good" are not genetic traits, even if they can be passed by upbringing.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:20 PM
2

f.e. being meant as 'for example'. and yes, agree on the reasoning that it would be considered "gay" and therefore men would use something like "mate" instead.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:02 PM
0

Some of the terms are slightly gendered though. while a female employee would call patrons of both sexes sweetie f.e., a male employee would be unlikely to call another male employee sweetie. Not a important/big distinction, just throwing it out there.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:42 PM
2

Yes, and the original version of this comic just had the top set of frames and the word society, not men, on the side.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:48 PM
1

I think we agree in subject but view it slightly differently. the number of female characters in thomas the tank engine is not very important. Yet there is no reason why there shouldn't be more female characters in the show, and while not important as a social change, it would be a minor step forward in my opinion. The fact that woman often opt for careers of the sort you describe are most likely largely caused by the long history of women being outside the workforce in general, and therefore me…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:25 AM
1

I can't agree there. Do you truly feel that the difference in power and influence through history has been equal between the genders? both have advantages over the other in certain fields, but the advantages held have been far from equal. I don't agree with the second comment either, but I'm happy to give it a try if you can explain how the sensible way of defining power works, and some example(s) of the control either sex has an advantage in.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:13 AM
1

You have a valid point, and I agree to a certain extent. what I will add though is that I think that most of the time females partaking in the interest of f.e. superhero fiction are more interested in it despite the male focus, and are a minority. the fact that there are as many as evidence shows just means that we are moving forward. A good thing, but it is still more difficult for a female to partake in the interest than it is for a male because of social pressures, and having more positive fe…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:07 AM
1

could you clarify? are you suggesting that men are discriminated against more or in equal parts compared to women? that men do NOT have more power than women?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:58 AM
1

our experiences may simply differ. I find entitlement to be relatively equal to both sexes. I'm aware that this differs between different cultures, but I know just as many men who feel entitled to things as women. I'm not accusing you of selective viewing, and of course I don't know you, but is it possible you may simply notice it more from one "side" than from the other? just asking, not meant as an attack or anything.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:13 AM
1

Yes, and surely we already know that thomas the tank engine will now instantly change! Common. this is not against a specific show but more against a trend, and while there are shows that are completely or close to completely female, there are many more that are completely female. To compare, saying this person is discriminated against is valid; Saying these 10 people are discriminated against is also valid, but will understandably be considered more important because it, quite frankly, IS. I'm …
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:01 AM
1

That's not the only reason that girls don't want to be train drivers, and the point is not to suggest so. As for why most railway enthusiasts are male, I wouldn't know. It could be biology, it could be socialization, it could be a mixture, but I seriously doubt that Thomas The Tank Engine is a big factor here... I can't know for certain, but culture/socialization seems like the most sensible answer. therefore, changing the culture to a point where a girl can* more easily associate with the job i…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:42 AM
0

or.... you know... he could just not care at all about my little pony?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:32 AM
-1

indeed, but that doesn't change how fair the concept of alimony is. It's still a good thing in certain situation, and the differences in how often it is the case in men/women women/men is irrelevant to the fairness of the concept, and, lets just face it: the women would be less likely to have had a professional career anyway because things have been stacked against women in the ease and motivation of having one for a long time.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:14 AM
1

Do we really have a reason to believe that though? I think both sexes look at themselves and around, and that it's more a individual thing which you focus on rather than one based on gender. can you give any reasoning/evidence to support that women "look around" more than men do?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:32 PM
-1

The word is, but it's because it was coined when women were in basically every way inferior in society(read as considered/treated inferior), and lets face it: there are several things that are unfairly biased against men, and those should be fought, but today, even in the more advanced societies, women still face more discrimination then men. A nice no-preference-of-gender name might be better, but you know, tradition, establishment and all that. not great, but not a big issue I think.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:37 PM
1

The later line you quoted makes some sense. If you believe in treating people equally you are a feminist by the official definition of the word. Of course, in different context the word can refer to the movement rather than the ideal, and equating the two as the same is either misguided or dishonest, but there is an active and understandable effort being made by many feminists to "take back" the word feminism, because having the ideal of feminism(that is, equal rights between the sexes) mixed/ta…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 05:30 PM
2

Sure. I still believe that many aspects of gender roles have considerable more to do with culture than with integral natural characteristics, and that men "should be tough and not go whining to others if they feel depressed" is very much a cultural gender role, and not needed. It's where the sub-conscious effort kicks in when you really see how ingrained gender roles can be.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:59 PM
0

would you believe that thinking about what you have, if it satisfies you and if not, whether you can get something that will is in fact quite normal and done by men as well? Aside from the obvious "don't marry a white woman because this one woman here seems questionable to me"
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:41 PM
3

most men are generally seen to be unable to seek help (nothing to do with gender roles, this is just basic psychology) I'd say it has quite a bit to do with gender roles. It is partially because of the idea that a man should be strong, and should not show vulnerability that it is hard for many men to seek help. Good comment though.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:26 PM
1

Is it our fault that they're one of the only papers that actually covers things from a pro-male perspective from time to time? It may simply be an indicator that you're trying too hard to find shocking stories where men are denied their rights if you're willing to pull them out of the metaphorical dumpster.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter