TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sme52 Archive

View 1 post and 80 comments by sme52 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

sme52/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

he's more likely to get hired than a white woman, who is more likely to get hired than a black man, who is more likely to be hired than a black woman and so on and so on Except that was my point of talking about admission standards. A difference of 220 points is a "free" pass for whites. How about color blind, then it isn't a free pass? The argument of preconceived notions does not hold up. You can not prove preconceived notions, you cannot say that person did not like because I'ma certain color…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:45 PM
2

I know that if I were a woman, I would go through pregnancy because I want children. Likewise if men could get pregnant and have it be similar in medical safety as woman's pregnancy, I would share the burden of having children. Parents should be treated fairly. Why should I expect my partner to bear all the pains of pregnancy, when it would be just as easy for me to do so?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:03 AM
3

Anecdotes are not the best evidence, but I think it proved the point of this article. That white men don't have a free pass just for being a white male. Sometimes anecdotes are needed in order to get people to pay attention, but you always need the evidence to back it up.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:38 PM
7

DocSeuss_Needs_A_Good_Day's comment was much better than the article. Actually, I couldn't finish the article.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:15 PM
2

a kid should have the advantages of having two providing parents. I absolutely agree, actually the more I read into family structures I realize that even two parents aren't enough. Raising a kid takes a village—it's a bit cliche but absolutely accurate. Extended families living together or communal living just makes perfect sense. People are suppose to have groups with tens of people. I think it's especially important for children to have this environment. Children don't need structure and …
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:50 PM
3

It happens to the best of us.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:08 AM
2

I guess I should have made it more clear that it was a joke. I generally only use emoticons when I'm joking about something but how would strangers on the internet know that?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:01 AM
3

If I actually had one it might be, but it was suppose to be a joke because I really didn't want to talk about my penis size.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:57 AM
1

see edit of comment. What I actually meant is we are just friends and have no romantic/sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:54 AM
6

Sorry I have a micropenis :'(. Actually we aren't the have sex with each other type of people. Edit: I don't actually have a micropenis, it was suppose to be a joke.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:33 AM
16

I recently had a conversation with my roommate (mid twenties) about how bad it hurt. She came to the conclusion that she has nothing to compare in terms of pain after I told her "It hurts to the point that I have thrown up"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:15 PM
1

Alright so change the wording but it's still the same issue. Women can choose whether they want their kid or not, men do not have that choice. The only reason I say that men should have to choose before the baby is born, is that the woman can make her decision based on that fact. Obviously, this has the flaw of sticking the woman in a tough situation: do I face the guilt of having an abortion, try to raise it on my own, or have the pain of giving a baby up for adoption. Really, I think it's just…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:11 PM
4

Good summary of rights but what is the argument here? Should men be able to opt-out of child support before the baby is born? It seems wrong that woman has full choice over having a baby once the baby is conceived, but the man is stuck with whatever choice she makes.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:06 PM
1

No opt-out iun a reasonable time so the woman has time to abort if she chooses, but if you are never told then you should be able to fight it in court.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:01 PM
1

I used to feel powerless and was depressed all the time. Then, I realize that I was not alone. Now, I feel calm because a burden has been lifted but angry because fuck people who hate because someone is different.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:39 AM
1

Men have not been 'doing it to women for centuries' either. I was just quoting the standard feminist line to point out Redspringer's doublespeak. Thanks for pointing out one example of the many flaws in feminist logic.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:58 PM
8

Plus, we are much more likely to be seen as physically threatening when we say something like that, where a woman, not so much... So let's excuse all discrimination towards men because men have been doing it to women for centuries, also men are scary. Sorry but while you may say it's wrong for them to do this, you used the same argument as the feminist...it's okay because Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:07 PM
5

Make father's day a big deal in your family. Convince others to do the same. That's all you can do.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:34 PM
0

It's fair that a man would placate a woman by crossing the street. I say that because most people would placate anyone with an irrational fear that the person makes worse. You wouldn't hug a germophobe even if it's your best friend you haven't seen in years. It's called being considerate. And yes, her fear is irrational, but it is a result of fear mongering by the media, which she recognizes. If we want to avoid this situation then we need to change the media until then we can be considerate of …
/r/MensRights13/05/12 04:12 PM
1

Thanks, I will get to that as soon as I can stop reading about false rape allegations. I've looked into these issues but only recently started finding places that thoroughly explain the stats. Basically, I'm just now finding how deep the rabbit hole goes.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 09:05 PM
4

I have yet to make a decision on the wage gap because I have yet to see data that controls for even the major variables. If someone could point me in the direction of a study (or data) that controls for years of experience, degree, and hours worked then I would be able to make a decision.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:42 PM
3

I think internet porn has just raised a generation to realize that nobody is "normal". Everybody has some fetish others might consider weird, but on the internet their is always a community who appreciates the same "deranged" sex you do.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:53 AM
1

Ah, that I cannot answer for you.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:02 AM
2

How do I resolve this cognitive dissonance? Businesses should be allowed to discriminate, but society should work so that doesn't happen. If a minority were to be excluded, people would boycott that business, the same should happen on the basis of gender. All people need to stand up and say this isn't okay. Discrimination isn't something you counteract by making a new law, it takes societal changes before a law can have effect.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:27 AM
8

I probably wouldn't react as severely as calling the police, but my "ruh-roh" sense would be tingling and on edge. That's a reasonable response. The question is, "Would you ask what is going on before freaking out, regardless of the genders involved?"
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:12 PM
1

Yeah, unfortunately there is no absolute in law. Lawyers and Judges can always twist words to suit their own agenda.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:33 PM
2

No some judge interpreted it that way. The wording of Title IX is pretty clear. It just says no one can be discriminated against by race, gender, etc. Title IX in itself is a good law, it's interpretation is not.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:46 PM
2

Because Title IX was not interpreted as how many athletic spots are available for each sex, but how many athletes were of a each sex. So it doesn't matter if the school offers 200 spots for women and 100 for men, if only 60 women compete and 100 men compete it still breaks the rules. So schools drop all boys sports. Since wrestling for most schools is not a money making sport it gets dropped.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:16 PM
1

she's good and benefits the man. Did the knight now she was good before he went to save her? No, he had rumors that a beautiful virgin was wanting for someone to save her. Honestly he didn't truly know she was beautiful, it's not like they had video cameras back then. He just knew that he must sacrifice himself because he was a man in an attempt to save her because she was a woman. These are the stories we tell to children i don't know what a knight did back than to a woman who cheated on him. K…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 06:58 AM
2

why do men seem more likely to be the ones to step away or, put bluntly, inconvenience themselves for the sake of another? Isn't this what we have been taught? Growing up I was taught by media, by parents, and by peers that, "Women value a man by how much he sacrifices for them, men value a woman for how much she gives to him." Even children's stories taught me that real man should be the silent tragic hero. The worse thing is that I realized I was being taught this as a child, and I internalize…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:38 AM
12

And when dad got mad you knew you were in big trouble...at least that was how it was with me.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:06 PM
1

I agreed that it was, but using government to break stereotypes that are not true (as most stereotypes are) does not strike me as immoral. Re-enforcing those stereotypes through government appalls me, which is why I am on /MR
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:01 PM
2

My worldview is not black or white. Immoral actions can have benefits. They should be condemned for their immorality and condone for their benefits. And someone should explain why it was immoral so that in the future it can be made to be both beneficial and moral.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:53 PM
3

Yes and no, the camp receives government funding so by law it should be gender blind. On the other hand, women do face the stereotype that women are not good at math. I recently read a book on the subject of gender differences in math, but I don't have it with me to reference. Anyways the book claimed that studies have shown that when women are told they are just as good at math as men, they perform only a few percentage points below the men on standardize tests. Since I am against all stereotyp…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:35 PM
11

plain egalitarian Plain egalitarian implies political and economic equality as well as many other forms of equality. Egalitarianism is best when a person qualifies what type of equality they want.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:30 AM
2

Women have a method of protection, its called the HPV vaccine. Men don't have a way of regrowing body parts.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:25 AM
1

Gender Egalitarian I like that one, I'm using it from now on.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:16 AM
3

I hope I was clear and concise. Perhaps "Feminist" isn't the correct term I want to use. Since you describe as pansexual, I would go with Equal Right's Advocate and drop the gender binary. Most people face some sort of discrimination at some point in their lives, so we should be working to make all people equal and to destroy all stereotypes.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:47 AM
2

Some of us still grow up by going off on our own and coming home for dinner. Fewer due to all the scares, but all of those that live in rural areas get to do this. And I wouldn't have had it any other way growing up. I learned a lot about nature and how not to get lost. While not entirely practical for a job anymore, the stuff I learned as a child being out on my own is still extremely useful.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:30 AM
1

A step towards egalitarianism. But the wording of the article bothers me. Such as the selfless comment others are talking about.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:41 PM
0

Grand High Imperial Wizard of the Seventh Circle of Bleach and Snow and Rice in the Super-KKK. Seriously? I wanna have that cool.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 09:36 PM
4

Don't worry we all have those sentences we can't manage to get to be quite like what we mean. (That is a confusing sentence, but I don't know how to say it better)
/r/MensRights01/05/12 09:29 PM
1

It could be interpreted that way, but since she is anarchists she felt that all people should have as much freedom as possible. Obviously, an anarchist recognizes that all people deserve to be free. To answer your list based on my understanding of anarchism. they have the right to support themselves, but also the right to be supported by a man Check, only society (no government) can pressure people to choose not to be supported by someone else. So maybe she thought society was fine in that way, …
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:49 PM
2

I told an ex (we broke up for different reasons) this when we were discussing children, she couldn't believe I felt so strongly about it. But I am lucky to not have been circumcise due to the circumstances of my birth (my parents wanted to but other things made it impractical).
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:51 AM
2

Only the last one makes it look like satire. I have met all too many girls that go through the "all men are pigs". My best friend even did it while I was treating her to ice cream and a night of whatever she wanted after a break up (we did talk about the blanket statement after she calmed down).
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:47 AM
1

Completely agreed, including the disclaimer. Jobs are much more stressful than housework. I find cleaning and cooking to be relaxing, taking care of children...sometimes stressful, sometimes not, just depends on how hyper and how busy I am at that moment. I know there is a lot more to being a stay-at-home parent than that, but there has to be a reason the work-life balance has been getting pushed more and more lately. "life" should be less stressful than work.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:04 AM
1

There is that difference in morality again. I don't think we are overcoming this issue. Nice conversation though, enlightening as to how someone else views property defense.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:55 AM
2

I assure you, I do not condone murder for shoplifting, and neither does any serious person. I figured you did not condone that. My issue is just with proportionality, which I subscribe to similar political views as you apparently (I would have linked to Mises as well). Anyways back to the original article and her response. I think it was disproportionate to the bf's actions. Maybe it is because I do not value my phone highly, if I go a day without it I barely even notice. I do value my privacy, …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:05 PM
2

Wasn't there are article on here a couple days (maybe weeks) that was about a study showing that women (and maybe men, I don't remember the article that well) become more violent when they take on "male" roles?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:38 PM
16

I agree with her that the aesthetics are what get the initial interest. But it works both ways, men and women initially judge based on appearance and presentation of oneself. Every HR person will tell you that, first impression particularly on appearance can make or break an interview and what is the first conversation but an interview? Remember though, personality is x1000 more important for a successful relationship. It's easy to get over the fact that your SO might be snaggle-toothed or their…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:20 PM
1

One has the right to defend one's property, to even use the force required to retrieve your property. Sorry that I do not share your sense of morality. Yes, you can defend your property, but there are limits: What if someone steals your cookie? Do you have the right to punch, kick, scratch and bite them to retrieve it. Anyone pass kindergarten would say no. So where do we draw the line. Would it have been okay for her to stab him to retrieve the phone? Is it acceptable to shoot someone who is wa…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:12 PM
1

No. They both acted inappropriately. He should not have taken the phone, but that does not give you the right to "punching, kicking, scratching and biting". Let's put it this way "Girlfriend steals phone from boyfriend, boyfriend assaults by punching and kicking her to retrieve phone." If you say the boyfriend acted appropriately, then you are not sexist. But I doubt most people would agree that the bf acted appropriately.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:26 PM
1

Umm okay... what is there to say about this? This is worse than when I heard about the MRS degree freshman year of college.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:12 AM
1

The easiest way to deal with foul accusations like that is to ignore them. By ignoring them, you allow the stereotype that all men are pedophiles to continue. I enjoy being around children, they are almost always happy and playful. Playing with children makes my day, and if society says I can't because of some stupid stereotype I am going to be pissed.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:27 PM
1

Sorry if I offended you at any point. I am not a Grammar Nazi. I generally let things slide but that sentence made me do a double take to make sure you weren't a troll.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:25 PM
1

I remember people getting upset about "We do not want this war" because nearly everyone at that time was saying that we need to exterminate all terrorists. If people were upset about them criticizing the President it wasn't in my area, by that time my area did not like the President. So maybe in your area people were upset that they criticized the president but not mine.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:23 PM
1

I get that, but the wrong pronoun was used in that sentence. The men aren't proven wrong (men thinnk they aren't pedos to be proven wrong would mean they are), the women are proven wrong that the men aren't pedos.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:32 PM
1

because they criticized the "war on terror"not the president
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:29 PM
1

I have to say there are some very mixed messages in that bunch. Some are good and I think yeah that makes a nice relationship and some are: "what women should know: a man who truly loves you will never let you go no matter how hard the situation is/ what men should know: a woman who truly loves you will be angry at you for so many things but will stick around." I don't know what to say to that, it sounds like a horrible relationship for everybody involved. But worse it makes it seem like men are…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:30 AM
3

Am I the only one that thinks that when we get accused by a woman of being a pedophile and when we're proven wrong that we should actually fight back.... Did you mean to say we and not them, because it definitely reads like you are saying men are pedophiles. I understand that you didn't mean that but still.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:18 AM
-1

The media labelled the Dixie Chicks so harshly because they criticized the "war on terror" not the president, if I remember correctly by 2003 it was okay to criticize W. Ted Nugent is only criticizing the president, something people do everyday and it isn't a big deal. It's unfair to compare the two situations as they are not really the same. That being said I thought it was unfair how the media reacted to the Dixie Chicks then and I still do. The civil liberties breaches that have happened in t…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:15 AM
6

Upvote everytime I see him.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 11:16 PM
10

This may be the best advice you could possibly give another man. I recently discovered this, then I realized that their is only one woman I have ever felt like this around.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:06 PM
3

Typically stories on here just piss me off. This one gave me hope. Glad you shared and congratulations!
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:55 PM
1

I think implying that men are messy is not a big deal. Saying that men need training just like dogs, well that is a bit offensive.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:48 PM
5

I'm pretty new to this as well but I believe you would be correct.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:44 PM
3

I'm guessing most single males will be buying paper towels, so that's gotta be at least 20% of the market.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:42 PM
2

1) Diversity does not equal success 2) You have given no proof of your statements. The only biological diversity I can think of that is greater in males is physical appearance, and that is only true in birds and fishes due to sexual selection. In large mammals, males and females tend to be similar in appearance. Humans have one of the biggest difference in appearance based on sex in large mammals. This does not mean that they have a big difference in intelligence that would lead to difference in…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:27 AM
3

I absolutely agree with you, but I felt the way he worded the response could be misconstrued as sexist. I would like to see gender neutral terms used in all circumstances, I even agree with the feminists that wish for gender neutral pronouns, because law, media, and work should needs to be gender blind.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:31 PM
3

The difference is that males, of all mammalian species, are more diverse than the females. This is bullshit, this is not what MRM is about and this is sexist as sexist can be. If you can show me scientific papers pointing to this as an actual phenomena I may agree with you. As far as my own life is concerned, I have seen just as many good ideas come from men as from women. And just as high of quality of work come from men and women, the difference is personal choice not nature.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:27 PM
0

I don't think you need to be litigious, but having a recorder and discussing with them how the comments might hurt your feelings may make them think about how they treat you. I know you fear for your job if you bring this up. If they fire you, you should go to court, because it isn't being a litigious piece of shit to sue a business that behaves in this manner. It is the only way we are going to change how society sees misandry and feminism.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:22 PM
1

I applaud you on introducing discussion on misandry into your school. Your essay is not misogynistic just because it addresses men's issues but some of your analogies and discussions could be interpreted as misogynist. Of course not, all it is, is that black sprinters on a world class level are faster than white sprinters on a world class level. This analogy makes it seem like Men perform better at their job compare to women. This isn't true, the real cause of more men in upper level management …
/r/MensRights24/04/12 06:16 PM
2

A related article pointing out that the change is due to changes in men's lifestyle not women's healthcare.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 12:33 AM
1

Yeah happened to me to, but you should care because banning should be used only to those people who are rude or trolls or actually do something wrong. Preemptive banning is like convicting you of a "reddit" crime when you haven't even been accused yet. But then again this is radical feminism we are talking about — All men (MR sympathizers) are guilty of the crime of using air, food, water and other resources strictly reserved for womyn.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:50 PM
3

What really happened here that is worth 5 years of some guy's life? It's not just five years, it's a lifetime of being labelled a criminal, a lifetime on the ViSOR. People really need to revisit the definitions of sex crimes if the punishments are going to be so harsh. Some people deserve a life time of branding as a sex offender, but more and more I hear about good men who made one bad decision that basically ends their life as a respectable person. This is just a personal anecdote but one of m…
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:28 PM
1

The judge should be charged with murder if she sentences a 12 year to life imprisonment. It's practically the same, she is taking away his life. He is still a boy, he should be given psychiatric help, an education and a chance to make up for his actions.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:03 AM
2

If you do something, think about how you would feel it if were done to you The golden rule- we teach that to every child, so why can't adults seem to internalize it?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:21 PM
4

Agree with you 100%, I have begun telling significant others at the beginning of the relationship that I never intend on marrying. I will be 100% committed to them but I have political and personal reasons as to why I never want to be legally married. If they don't understand they probably aren't the right person for me anyways.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:33 AM
1

Yeah I figured it out about that time, but it didn't stop me from making a bad choice in college. She didn't play the games in the beginning so I was head over heels for her before she started being manipulative.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 09:21 PM
3

I see a few people stating equalization of reproductive rights as an argument for pro-life. I feel like a better solution to equalizing rights would be to allow the male to legally relieve himself of any duty to the child before the child's birth.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 03:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter