smegnose Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-2	A woman's only bathroom or a joint bathroom. I did put a qualifier in my statement, expecting some clarification from OP. None came and that is not my fault. Did you read it? I'll repeat it for you: If they're not single-commode rooms then OP's point stands. The only reason I even commented is that there have been several such posts where it turned out the bathroom was only for one occupant and unisex. That kind of whingeing reflects poorly on all of us.	/r/MensRights	22/06/15 11:31 AM
-5	A woman's only bathroom or a joint bathroom. Try reading comments before replying to them. It helps a great deal.	/r/MensRights	22/06/15 11:18 AM
-13	A woman's only bathroom or a joint bathroom. They look a lot like single-commode rooms. The type where, if you're in there, you're not sharing with anyone, let alone the opposite gender. If they're not, your point stands but, if so, stop your fucking whining. This is a simple engineering problem, females typically take more frequent and lengthier bathroom trips because physics. Equality does not mean equal time per anatomy type.	/r/MensRights	22/06/15 05:30 AM
6	UK woman facing jail after falsely accusing two men of rape can't fathom Fathoming something is the opposite of what you mean.	/r/MensRights	05/06/15 09:02 PM
13	UK woman facing jail after falsely accusing two men of rape Well, if you find "the" confusing, we're hardly going to reword our sentences for you.	/r/MensRights	05/06/15 09:00 PM
1	An attractive young lady intends to have sex with a player on each of the 17 hockey teams. She texts nudes of herself with an invite for sex. Two 19-year-old males face felony charges including sex with a minor. Who's the sexual predator? But not equivalent to most people. I think laws should be changed regarding sexting, or she should be charged. But there's nothing okay about what the guys did, camera-wise.	/r/MensRights	21/02/15 11:55 PM
4	An attractive young lady intends to have sex with a player on each of the 17 hockey teams. She texts nudes of herself with an invite for sex. Two 19-year-old males face felony charges including sex with a minor. Who's the sexual predator? ITT: people who didn't read the article, or think sending a nude of yourself to someone you're trying to seduce is the same as sending video of a sex act to a third party.	/r/MensRights	21/02/15 12:21 PM
1	An attractive young lady intends to have sex with a player on each of the 17 hockey teams. She texts nudes of herself with an invite for sex. Two 19-year-old males face felony charges including sex with a minor. Who's the sexual predator? No. Not "male records nudes", "male records sex and sends it to his mates".	/r/MensRights	21/02/15 12:17 PM
1	Female developer posts to harass herself, but forgets to log out first. It is their fault, though. They didn't get it just because they wanted it. They got it because of power and influence at high levels being wielded with blatant disregard for the stakeholders. Personal assets of higher up employees/board who knew, or should have known they were doing wrong, but still gave themselves bonuses and wage increases. Not shareholders.	/r/MensRights	11/02/15 05:22 AM
1	Female developer posts to harass herself, but forgets to log out first. Those guarantees didn't come from nowhere, they were pushed for by the banks. Finland let them fail, just like the US should have. Then they should have gone after the personal assets.	/r/MensRights	10/02/15 11:41 AM
1	Female developer posts to harass herself, but forgets to log out first. Banks scamming nations has nothing to do with gov't interference. They are simply maximising profit and externalising liabilities, just like every large corporation. That's the behaviour that capitalism encourages, selfishness.	/r/MensRights	10/02/15 04:12 AM
0	That moment when a woman physically assaults you and everyone defends her. I’ve been thinking about it for a while…I am now a Men’s Rights Advocate. It was a woman who said he started it, so nothing.	/r/MensRights	16/12/14 02:58 AM
1	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million It probably doesn't. Though, if you've ever raised a child, you'd know they are expensive little things. So asking for some money is not a crime. I've never said she's completely in the right, I'm just very disappointed that most of contributions and upvotes in this thread are in support of arguments based on such obvious inaccuracies.	/r/MensRights	10/12/14 08:32 AM
2	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million Wrong.	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 09:34 AM
-4	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million Read the fucking article. They have a son together and he acted as parent to her daughter from the previous relationship.	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 09:33 AM
-12	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million No, she's been asking for money from him, for their son, the whole time. Did you even read the article?	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 04:12 AM
2	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million If he were a tossed, perhaps that may not have been so if he thought his dad gave a shit.	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 04:09 AM
-5	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million Read the article. He bailed on his own son and a daughter that he cared for as if she were his.	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 04:07 AM
-1	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million Shhh! Quiet with your sensible conclusions! Can't you see that all the upvotes are going to people who didn't read the article, or entirely glossed over the fact the he didn't take care of his son?	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 04:02 AM
6	A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 million No, read the article.	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 03:59 AM
4	Pointing that men suffer discrimation too is sexist because "it makes it looks like feminists only care about women" No no, she explains that by saying men are also the cause of men's problems.	/r/MensRights	22/11/14 01:48 PM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes I think I understand what putative means better than you. You just provided two examples where the putative "fact" is so widely believed, that they were/are used to imply that they are facts, even though (as you pointed out) they aren't. So back to this case, Ted8367 calling the accuser a putative liar, does not make him one.	/r/MensRights	18/11/14 04:59 AM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Dude, you're a fucking idiot. You've gone off on some tangent thinking I'm trying to subvert the legal system. I was advocating that the decision be based on evidence alone, and not to assume any details of the case beyond those presented, which is exactly what you've done by (not-so) privately thinking potential assault victims are just liars. In actual fact, I was saying it is equally possible (not probable) that the teacher is lying and the ex-student is not.	/r/MensRights	18/11/14 04:51 AM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes commonly put forth or accepted as true doesn't imply it's a fact Wat	/r/MensRights	17/11/14 01:03 PM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Putative means generally known to be. That's implying it's a fact. We don't know that and now you're just going around in circles.	/r/MensRights	17/11/14 11:42 AM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Of course they weren't because they're not a putative liar. There you go again, confusing accusation unproven with accusation false. I just pointed out that mistake and you made it again.	/r/MensRights	17/11/14 06:14 AM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes You asked if the accuser should be put on trial to see if he's lying. That doesn't make sense because that's what the original trial did. It's an adversarial legal system. The original trial could have been enough for other victims to come forward, or for the accused to simply admit guilt, had they committed the offences. So, to answer your question, yes. Equally, if the accuser was making accusations that were demonstrably false, they should be charged. In this case none of those things happene…	/r/MensRights	16/11/14 01:24 PM
2	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Trials don't prove people are or aren't lying when there's no physical evidence to support either claim. Asking for a trial to see if someone was lying doesn't even make sense.	/r/MensRights	16/11/14 01:10 AM
2	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes you should not have brought up the matter at all It's not ok to say that people who say they have been assaulted may be telling the truth? Okay, mate.	/r/MensRights	15/11/14 10:07 PM
3	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes The article and OP's related story comment blatantly frames the incident as a false accusation. It may well be, but we should assume no such thing without any evidence either way. I have said nothing about reversing the presumption of innocence, you have (incorrectly) inferred it.	/r/MensRights	15/11/14 12:54 PM
2	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Did you even read my first comment? I said it was right he was acquitted, that entails a presumption of innocence. Idiot.	/r/MensRights	15/11/14 12:48 PM
1	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Me speculating on that is as pointless as anyone else doing so, including OP. The only people who know are the boy and the teacher. Are you implying it's not ok for abused boys/men to come forward after the fact?	/r/MensRights	15/11/14 11:43 AM
0	Headteacher who was arrested at his desk on child sex abuse charges and endured year-long court ordeal is cleared by jury in just 15 minutes Of course he was cleared in no time, there would be absolutely no evidence whatsoever after that many years upon which he could be convicted. It's right that he was acquitted without evidence, as with any crime, otherwise we'd have innocent people being gaoled. But none of that proves that boy was not molested. Edit: I don't think you know what downvotes are for.	/r/MensRights	15/11/14 11:14 AM
0	British student who claims she was raped in Florence nightclub toilet is told she faces up to 12 years in Italian jail on false allegation charges "Now leave the bathroom with a smile on your face, or I'll follow you home and kill you" See how easy that was? This post is shit. Edit: Don't get so butthurt, people. I'm just saying there's no evidence presented either way. If you think leaving a bathroom at the same time as someone is any kind of evidence of whether you were or were not attacked by them, you're ignorant at best.	/r/MensRights	14/11/14 06:59 AM
13	6 year old boy kisses female classmate on the HAND - suspended for sexual harassment. 7 yr old Lena Dunham plays with 1 year old's vagina....... Still a major WTF. Why does this kid need "misconduct" on any record? No one was harmed. Sure, tell the parents it happened, ask them not to do it, at least at school. Give them some education. She should sue the school anyway.	/r/MensRights	07/11/14 07:04 AM
1	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! Quote me, then. Where did I say men don't suffer from false accusations? Nowhere. Where did I say these accusations are not a problem in India? Nowhere. Where do you say that the logic of the article's subjects is correct, and explain how I'm incorrect? Nowhere. Where do you demonstrate how punishments for honour crimes are not a cultural problem? Nowhere. I restated my point several times, trying to help you understand. You blatantly refuse to address any of that because it doesn't suit you. Yo…	/r/MensRights	10/10/14 02:25 PM
3	Crowdfunding campaign to "Pay back the money women lose from the 'wage gap'." How many times does this idea need to be proven wrong to stop the idiocy? Hear me out. This could be a great thing. If there is, enshrined in law, evidence that women will be paid exactly the same rates as men, then, when they do not have the same incomes, it will be more demonstrably provable that the wage gap comes down to the type of and hours that women work.	/r/MensRights	10/10/14 06:00 AM
1	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! OMFG. You may be well-informed, but you're a fucking idiot. I never said anything to diminish the suffering of the falsely accused. I'm talking about the bad reporting and faulty logic in the article. And yes I do think their is a cultural element to the yse of such faulty logic in this case. This isn't white-knighting, nice try with the ad hominem. By continually trying to argue this, you are implying that unproved = proved wrong, which demonstrates you either don't/can't read what you're reply…	/r/MensRights	10/10/14 05:21 AM
1	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! I think you're having trouble understanding me due to a language barrier. The language you are using is implying I'm personally responsible for innocent men's suffering. You're also arguing against points I'm not making. It's almost like watching someone talk to themself. The article itself admits they are equating not proving a rape occurred with proving a rape did not occur. This is a logical fallacy. The sheer volume and nature of newspieces coming out of India's media about rape casts doubt …	/r/MensRights	09/10/14 01:53 PM
1	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! You seem to lack skills of logical deduction. It's a sensationalist claim, plain and simple. There may be more false rape allegations, but there are probably more rapes, too. I'm sure there is plenty of suffering all around. I doubt many believe that India, where women still get acid or scalding hot oil thrown on them for "honour crimes", is an authority on rape statistics.	/r/MensRights	08/10/14 01:03 PM
1	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! Straw man much? I didn't say anything of the sort. Failure to prove a crime did happen ≠ proof that it did not happen.	/r/MensRights	07/10/14 07:35 PM
13	Dehli Commission for Women finds 50% of rape accusations are false! Delhi You may need more than a pinch of salt to swallow that.	/r/MensRights	07/10/14 05:08 AM
6	Male student thrown out of psychology class for stating he was a victim of rape as a boy by a man No, it should be"reprimanded".	/r/MensRights	11/09/14 01:39 PM
2	TIL withholding sex and affection is considered "Sexual violence" according to the university of michigan. Right you are.	/r/MensRights	13/08/14 11:41 PM
5	TIL withholding sex and affection is considered "Sexual violence" according to the university of michigan. I don't think so. Look at the context. If withholding = violence, then cheating = violence isn't much of a leap.	/r/MensRights	13/08/14 03:05 PM
1	I Saw a Man Get Arrested For a Sex Crime Because He Made a Scheduling Error Not as ludicrous a suggestion as you make out. An easily accessible registry of criminal convictions is not inherently a bad idea, it's that it would have to tell all sides of a story, and have expiration dates where appropriate.	/r/MensRights	18/07/14 11:29 AM
3	I Saw a Man Get Arrested For a Sex Crime Because He Made a Scheduling Error That's patently false true. Allowing people to be aware of legitimately dangerous deviants is not a bad thing. The real problem is that seems to do more harm than good, too many people are on it that shouldn't be. It's an on/off situation, there is not enough context as to why each person is on it.	/r/MensRights	18/07/14 06:23 AM
3	The word "Dad" banned for National Health Service baby guidelines in case it offend the gay community. Be offended when either you or your partner are able to gestate.	/r/MensRights	14/07/14 06:08 AM
1	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan That's true, but there a plenty of statistics that support high assault rates of both genders, where the context is "I want to tell someone", or "I need help" not "I want the perpetrator punished". When compared to police reports and conviction rates, it supports the premise that far more assults occur than are successfully prosecuted, ergo most people are not lying. Looking at plausible motivation rather than actual observations makes a weak argument.	/r/MensRights	11/07/14 05:09 AM
0	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan OMFG. I know! I never said anything in favour of this proposed law. All I said was 1% conviction rate =/= 99% false accusations.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 03:09 PM
1	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan Thank you. Still I'm being downvoted, bit lacking in the logic department in this thread.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 03:03 AM
1	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan It's not absurd to think the majority of people aren't lying all the time. If ten of your mates told you they'd been assaulted, would you believe only one of them, on principle?	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 03:01 AM
1	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan No, and that a gross oversimplification of human communication. Some people are assaulted when they've already said they don't want to have sex, but are pressured or forced into it, and they don't continue to say no or stop.	/r/MensRights	09/07/14 02:54 AM
1	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan Of course not, I think the proposed change to the law is absurd. I'm just saying that asserting that unprovable crimes equal false allegations is equally absurd.	/r/MensRights	08/07/14 03:13 PM
-6	NZ: Rape accused would have to prove consent under Labour plan Or maybe most people who are victims of sexual assault don't suddenly sober up enough to object or defend themselves. Maybe most don't find it easy to say "Don't mind me, I'm just going to get some footage of you committing a crime." Maybe you just don't know how hard it can be to say "no" or "stop" to someone you thought you trusted or loved. Proving crimes that often have no witnesses is notoriously difficult, and suggesting that low conviction rates equal mainly false allegations is irrespons…	/r/MensRights	08/07/14 02:02 PM
7	'Are You That Someone?' Posters around my city for both sides of the coin. except for the punctuation.	/r/MensRights	04/07/14 05:33 AM
19	Infant dies during circumcision Wife sounds like a bitch, but so do you.	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 06:50 AM
5	Infant dies during circumcision Don't you mean medically unnecessary?	/r/MensRights	06/06/14 06:49 AM
5	Special needs boy records his bullies, principal threatens him with felony wiretapping charges The real problem here is the law. In Australia there are exemptions from such recording laws where it is done to record the commission of a crime. That doesn't mean govt./police can record you without a warrant, it just means that individual recordings will be assessed with common sense before determining their legality. Shit like this will continue until you guys have legislated exemptions.	/r/MensRights	16/04/14 05:18 AM
6	Female privilege is being able to talk about gender issues without being called a "Crying Diaper Man-Baby" I think you'll find you've just accomplished a no true Scotsman fallacy.	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 01:34 PM
5	In reference to the female lawyer who falsely accused the cabbie of sexual harrasment; here's the video that proved his innocence They're making a joke.	/r/MensRights	10/04/14 01:41 AM
2	Woman who made false rape allegation and as a result three innocent men were arrested, is only fined £90. That's the point. People don't get angry at people who report rape. People get angry at people who make false reports. Hence, going easy on false reporters is not logical (bad policy) and should not deter real reports. I made sense, you just misinterpreted what I wrote.	/r/MensRights	16/02/14 10:04 PM
7	Woman who made false rape allegation and as a result three innocent men were arrested, is only fined £90. Not (reasonably) punishing false rape allegers has got to be the stupidest policy of law enforcement. Not finding enough evidence to convict someone of rape is not equivalent to having evidence that the rape definitely did not occur and the accuser was definitely lying.	/r/MensRights	16/02/14 12:45 PM
6	I am a straight white male, and I am done with being a feminist ally. : offmychest I wonder if he tried to post to /r/feminism first, and got removed.	/r/MensRights	19/01/14 03:55 AM
5	Australian feminists block research into mens physical and mental health. Can someone link to where UniSA itself has published the cancellation? They distanced themselves from the Adelaide Now article in their statement about the course. Edit: I live in SA and Adelaide Now is basically a shit rag that is known to do little fact checking and make errors all the time. OK for lining the budgie cage, though.	/r/MensRights	15/01/14 03:43 AM
8	Babysitter kills 23 month old boy because he wouldn't stop crying. Judge gives her 5 years and requires a yearly donation of just $1 to a charity of her choosing. I think your downvoters aren't getting that you refrained.	/r/MensRights	15/01/14 03:28 AM
1	Two college students (male and female) have sex. The next day the woman writes to the man: "I had a wonderful time, but I'm sorry I led you on, I'm not ready for a relationship". One year later: She files a charge of "non-consensual sexual contact" through the college disciplinary system. You were there?	/r/MensRights	18/12/13 01:11 PM
1	Sexual Assault quiz is a little biased... Are you related to /u/Everything_Is_Rape?	/r/MensRights	10/12/13 03:09 AM
1	If men did this.... I agree. I just thought that one sentence is ambiguous. You meant outrage against those women was misplaced.	/r/MensRights	06/12/13 01:37 PM
4	If men did this.... So the men appear to be behaving better there, but are doing so in support of an oppressive organisation. Both sides of that are fucked up.	/r/MensRights	06/12/13 04:21 AM
2	If men did this.... Do you mean "not misplaced"?	/r/MensRights	06/12/13 04:19 AM
3	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development Well, I thought so. I think the downvotes are just because other people believe the "creep" phenomenon is the norm. It's definitely valid, but that doesn't mean a majority of people experience it. I think it highlights a general problem with all controversial topics. Spending a lot of one's time discussing the most pertinent and extreme beliefs and acts distorts reality. You go online and get a flood of information about incidents involving injustice, violence, abuse. You read opinionated writin…	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 04:25 AM
–	Misuse of the word "creepy" and how it destroys male development I think there are plenty of women who are aware of this.	/r/MensRights	02/12/13 02:46 AM
-3	Mans ex gf sueing him for his lottery winnings....oh and she threw in a DV charge for the icing on the cake. Uhuh. And none of you would feel wronged if your partner of 10 years, that you lived with, had a kid with, and owned a store with, won the lotto and said you don't deserve any of it? Fucking bullshit you wouldn't. This has nothing to do with men's rights.	/r/MensRights	11/11/13 04:26 AM
2	Police make routine traffic stop and believe man has drugs in anus. The police brought the man to a hospital, where he was forced to undergo a rectal exam and colonoscopy without his consent. No drugs were found, no arrest was made, and the hospital billed the man for the medical procedures. 'Murrica	/r/MensRights	06/11/13 03:43 AM
3	Movember is "offensive", "gender-essentialist", "racist" and "clearly designed with a hairy white cisgender blonde guy" xPost/r/Feminism So by her logic, every activitiy that women do to raise breast cancer awareness is offensive: fun runs? against people with mobility impairments. pink ribbons/anything? clearly you're just part of the patriarchy who enforces the stereotype that pink is a female colour. baring breasts? cis-gendered, against women who have small breasts, or don't have breasts.	/r/MensRights	01/11/13 02:21 AM
6	Paternity test proves man is not the father of twins. Judge makes him keep paying child support anyway. This highlights a huge disconnect between law and technology. The law is ancient. We can now know for sure when this kind of fraud has been committed. As soon as you find out a child is not yours, you should be allowed to choose to relinquish all responsibility to the child, and recover all material support you have supplied. Importantly, choosing to do so should also revoke any rights to the child.	/r/MensRights	09/10/13 04:28 AM
–	Streaking: a woman's prank is a boy's sex crime Yet.	/r/MensRights	08/10/13 03:39 AM
1	Kim Hall uses internet filter to block nude pics that women were sending to her sons. Feminist says Hall is sexist: "we can and should do more to empower women, like those girls ... and educate men, like Mrs. Hall's sons." That's got to be one of the least intelligent articles I've ever read, but where is this "women sending selfies to children"? What did I miss? The mum was blocking pics to her boys from girls the same age as far as I could tell.	/r/MensRights	28/09/13 03:56 PM
23	Who do we blame for this moral mess? As feminists, we correctly blame patriarchy because boys are securely at the top of the status game. Boys end up with the authority. They have their cake and eat it. Looks like a 16 year old trying on feminism. Girls take selfies to get attention mainly from other girls, by the author's own admission, but it's the boys' fault? How about accepting that women are highly competitive and that they shoulder much of the responsibility.	/r/MensRights	24/09/13 11:32 AM
22	The Guardian runs a guide telling male students how not to behave. There is no female equivalent. This is a screenshot, not a link, because fuck them. I'm really glad they brought up the costumes point. Nothing says "I hate women" like wearing a costume.	/r/MensRights	24/09/13 05:08 AM
1	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. There are plenty of female politicians, now. That wasn't always so. What's your point?	/r/MensRights	18/09/13 01:12 AM
1	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. You sound very well informed and intelligent, said no one, ever.	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 01:07 PM
2	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. Because plebes. Also, Labor looked like a bunch of fuckwits because they fought and back-stabbed. People don't care that we weathered the GFC just fine and The Economist recommended another Labor govt. when they had Murdoch telling them Labor didn't know what they're doing.	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 01:05 PM
1	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. Giving a shit about other people is feminine? Then what are you doing in this sub?	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 12:10 PM
3	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. "Don't let ideology inform their decisions"? I'm sure his silence about child abuse in the church from when he was in the seminary has nothing to do with ideology. Do you know anything about Australian politics?	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 12:04 PM
-1	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. Factual. If you've actually heard the shit he's spouted, you wouldn't doubt this.	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 12:01 PM
3	Australia's new prime minister appoints a Cabinet based on merit and experience, feminists lose their shit because only one Cabinet member is a woman. The line is less distinct than you suggest. It's hard to get years of experience if you don't get hired because you don't have enough experience. The same is true for both genders, to be sure, but in politics there is definitely a hangover from years gone by when women just didn't get elected as much as men. Someone else posted that, for example, male nurses face the same kind of institutional sexism. Getting angry about women wanting more female politicians, is as stupid as getting angry about …	/r/MensRights	17/09/13 11:58 AM
1	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. What?	/r/MensRights	15/09/13 07:42 AM
2	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. Where does she lay it on the patriarchy? Please explain how she meant that, cause that's not what I read.	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 11:36 PM
3	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. She said "no one", not "no men", not "no women". Did you even read it?	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 11:34 PM
1	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. No, read the rest of the thread.	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 11:32 PM
3	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. You're the one being hypocritical, the commenter said "No one came to my rescue" with no mention of defending honour. Why don't you expect it to be other females coming to her aid? Ok, so replace child with weak-looking man. You know it was not the maturity I was referring to. It's about people being decent and not allowing others to be bullied.	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 04:41 AM
7	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. Replace the woman in the article with a male child/adolescent of similar strength, being harassed for whatever reason. Still think he should tough it out, with no one telling the group to fuck off?	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 03:57 AM
4	This is female privilege. Feminism is blind to it and this is why I need Men's Rights. When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle. Edmund Burke	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 03:53 AM
2	The main conservative party in Australia wants to pay mothers up to $75,000 in paid parental leave in order to "reduce the long-term financial advantage that men have over women." We didn't. They're not currently in power. They may be soon, though not for the reason in this post. It's generally the Liberals (conservative party) that campaign with fear mongering. Look at their "stop the boats" shit.	/r/MensRights	21/08/13 04:42 AM
7	"Define: ____" gives you an auto result in google. For a long time this came up blank, BUT TODAY IS A NEW DAY I guess that's good for the common folk but, if you'd consulted a good dictionary, you'd know that it's been known for over a century.	/r/MensRights	09/08/13 05:41 AM
1	3 women attack man and bouncer joins in, all because man refuses to buy one of the women a drink. Do you not have a video recorder on your phone?	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 04:40 AM
38	Female brothel boss found guilty of forcing numerous women ( one as young as twelve ) into prostitution gets a sentence of 3-6 years. Do you think a man would receive a similar sentence?	/r/MensRights	05/07/13 05:20 AM
2	Feminism killed chivalry That's why I used the qualifier "reproductively speaking", meaning those behaviours relating to assisting reproduction. Holding a door open is just a modern "Look, I can expend energy for, and prioritise others. I am a good mate." kind of behaviour. You wouldn't expect your partner to be a good provider only whilst you were pregnant, would you?	/r/MensRights	03/07/13 05:09 AM
11	My friend and "rapist" gets sentenced today. Different women, wally.	/r/MensRights	03/07/13 05:02 AM
2	Feminism killed chivalry Because millions of years of evolution has, reproductively speaking, made males into task performers and females into benefactors of said tasks. It's hard to hunt and retrieve a large herbivore whilst 30 weeks pregnant. It's not philosophy, it's biology, and it can't be completely undone in a few generations.	/r/MensRights	03/07/13 04:56 AM
1	My friend and "rapist" gets sentenced today. Incident over a year ago, got with (now) fiancée just after, with fiancée for around (or maybe over) a year.	/r/MensRights	03/07/13 04:41 AM
2	New Hampshire Teacher: Stop Penalizing Boys Who Can't Sit Still You think it's limited to the US?	/r/MensRights	02/07/13 05:50 AM
1	I'm pregnant and we just found out we're having a boy. My husband wants him circumcised, but I'm completely against that. How do I explain this to him? My dad was circumcised, I'm not, and my son isn't. It's medically unnecessary and your son will not sufffer from being left intact.	/r/MensRights	29/06/13 02:48 PM
0	"I have never seen a gender divide like the one that now exists in Australian politics as a direct result of a cynical Prime Minister systematically and methodically insulting men and debasing feminism by invoking gender as a weapon to make false claims and cynical smokescreens" She shouldn't, but when her decisions and mistakes are attributed to these things, it's just muckraking. No one attributes PRISM to Obama's ears.	/r/MensRights	18/06/13 04:53 AM
2	"I have never seen a gender divide like the one that now exists in Australian politics as a direct result of a cynical Prime Minister systematically and methodically insulting men and debasing feminism by invoking gender as a weapon to make false claims and cynical smokescreens" The quote provided by OP was one-sided cherry picking.	/r/MensRights	17/06/13 11:47 PM
-3	"I have never seen a gender divide like the one that now exists in Australian politics as a direct result of a cynical Prime Minister systematically and methodically insulting men and debasing feminism by invoking gender as a weapon to make false claims and cynical smokescreens" That argument would hold if she weren't actually the recipient of much misogyny. 'Cause having your peers and the media constantly comment on superficial crap like your hair is healthy discussion.	/r/MensRights	17/06/13 11:47 PM
-8	"I have never seen a gender divide like the one that now exists in Australian politics as a direct result of a cynical Prime Minister systematically and methodically insulting men and debasing feminism by invoking gender as a weapon to make false claims and cynical smokescreens" That paragraph is about one speech she gave. If you'd heard it you wouldn't be getting your knickers in a knot. If you'd heard some of the crap she's put put up with, like being asked if her partner (not husband) is gay on live radio, you wouldn't be quoting the sensationalist claptrap that the Herald pushes.	/r/MensRights	17/06/13 01:41 PM
32	Why do people think that this is acceptable? Translation: "I made poor choices with regard to relationships. I blame other people."	/r/MensRights	17/06/13 05:27 AM
1	Facts about gender discrimination - infographic with sources Are you sure?	/r/MensRights	20/05/13 03:38 AM
1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim How do you call yourself a reasonable person? I'm sorry that you still think that's "my central thesis". I'm sorry you are unable to accept that you made a mistake in your initial interpretation and kept running with it anyway. Also, if you're telling people what "their" ideas are, they're probably your ideas.	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 10:17 PM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim I'm sorry, I didn't realise you had a learning difficulty. Let me be clearer. There are lots of people who still believe that a wife should obey their husband. They are not a majority any more. Historically (that means in the past), it was a majority of people who believed this. So, there were very real consequences of not behaving accordingly (bad things happened if you didn't do what you were told). I wrote that to support my original point (this one). Mm'kay?	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 01:54 PM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim I'm not the one who's running away. I notice you've conveniently neglected to answer this: What is you think I meant by "it's really just cultures that have not grown out of such barbarism, like yours has."?	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 12:59 PM
0	My fiancé refuses to sign a pre-nup, based on her history I insist on one. Am I out of line? You can use any word like that as a metaphor. And fuck no.	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 12:53 PM
-3	My fiancé refuses to sign a pre-nup, based on her history I insist on one. Am I out of line? Rape? Can't you find a better verb? Even disembowelling would be preferable.	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 05:50 AM
1	California dad 'begged for his life' as police beat him to death - witnesses: They would have stopped if he was a woman the cause of death’s release is pending a toxicology report and microscopic studies Did you read the article? Seems like the cause of death was probably the batons.	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 05:25 AM
1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim You've just totally missed my point. You're equating women who voluntarily obey their husbands in present day, because it is in their belief system, with those in centuries passed who may not have had the choice. I was never trying to make a point that "women are currently oppressed in western society". Saying I was, even after an explanation, only demonstrates your poor comprehension. Getting a google result for "disprivileged", or any word doesn't mean shit. I can get a result for "roflcopter"…	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 05:23 AM
1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim I never said traditional societies were benevolent to anyone.	/r/MensRights	15/05/13 05:15 AM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim You're an idiot. Having a go at me for using a red herring when that's exactly what you've done. I never tried to "prove women in the western world are disprivileged compared to men by citing instances in parts of the world that are not western." I never said women in the western world were 'disprivileged' at all. (BTW disprivileged is not a word.) I actually said quite the opposite, that despite the fact that generally women no longer endure such poor treatment, there exists evidence that this …	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 02:48 PM
-1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim So it's a bad argument to give examples of women being treated as valueless/property when debating the idea of women as historically enslaved? I'll have to file that one away.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 01:00 PM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim I never said there aren't exceptions, but they are largely exceptions.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 06:32 AM
15	California dad 'begged for his life' as police beat him to death - witnesses: They would have stopped if he was a woman pending a toxicology report batons to the head are pretty toxic	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 06:30 AM
3	Re: Why You Shouldn't Compliment Random Women (the real reason) It's all in the delivery.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 06:19 AM
-3	Re: Why You Shouldn't Compliment Random Women (the real reason) Sorry to hear that.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 06:19 AM
4	Re: Why You Shouldn't Compliment Random Women (the real reason) I would not have a partner and a child if I withheld random compliments. Methinks the feminist is a bit down about not getting compliments.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 06:12 AM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Bullets are a relativley modern invention and a man dying to protect his family didn't mean they didn't obey him Wow that is stupid. You know they had spears, before? Or bows, swords, halberds, maces, baselards, slingshots, morning stars, knives, crossbows, glaives, axes, falshions, nunchakus, bills, javelins or clubs. nor had an equal status in society. Citing bullets was to highlight that Gornasht displayed a very short view of history. a man dying to protect his family didn't mean they didn't…	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:59 AM
-1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Because anyone who has a contrary opinion to yours on a specific topic must be a feminist? That's some solid logic, mate.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:42 AM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim I did not say that. Western women are now far less oppressed than their counterparts in other countries, but this was not always the case. You seem to be one of the people that (incorrectly) think that anyone in agreeance with the idea that women still face some oppression, means they also believe that men don't.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:35 AM
1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim You think your logic is awesome? I was discussing women's position throughout human history. Citing that there are still remnants of being treated as property in what is considered to be one of the most progressive cultures, and mentioning that there are other cultures where this treatment is worse, does not equal "complain[ing] about western society, cit[ing] China, India and Middle East"	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:28 AM
-2	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Straw man. When did I ever mention personal relationships between opposite ends of the class scale?	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:22 AM
2	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Why would I? That doesn't change the fact men were largely considered the head of the household in that era. And this is obvisouly not the slavery I am pointing out. Seems a lot of MRAs have a very short memory when it comes to history.	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:21 AM
1	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim How does that contradict my point?	/r/MensRights	14/05/13 05:18 AM
-10	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Good chance you're from the USA, less than one minute of searching gave me this. Would you consider yourself a free agent if you could not leave home because you would lose everything you owned? You don't have to be in shackles to be enslaved.	/r/MensRights	13/05/13 12:00 PM
-20	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim Are you mental? There are still sections of "western" society today where the wife is to obey her husband. Brides today still often have their father pay for the wedding, a fading homage to a dowry. In many countries these payments still exist. Just look at China and India where girl babies are literally thrown away because they are 'not of the same value'. Have a look how women are treated in much of the Middle East, it may seem like extremism but it's really just cultures that have not grown o…	/r/MensRights	13/05/13 11:48 AM
0	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim That's basically true. It's not the any more case in many modern societies, but that doesn't discount historical facts. Have you looked at commercial porn lately? Slapping, choking, generally treating women like pieces of meat is pretty common. People can do what they want, they're consenting, but it doesn't negate the content. Logical fallacy. Sexual assaults are decreasing, media coverage + hype is increasing. False, but most positions of higher authority are filled by men. Though, this doesn'…	/r/MensRights	13/05/13 04:23 AM
-27	Help! My mother is being indoctrinated by Extreme Feminisim But women were also slaves to their husbands.	/r/MensRights	13/05/13 04:09 AM
5	What real men like.. It's just ignorance.	/r/MensRights	10/05/13 04:43 AM
12	What real men like.. Duh.	/r/MensRights	10/05/13 04:32 AM
11	People seriously think this? Are you sure this isn't shopped?	/r/MensRights	24/04/13 01:42 PM
6	Young man in argument with old couple. Old woman assaults him. Young man proceeds to sit down and open a beer. Old man proceeds to kick him, upper hook him in the face, and squeeze his eyes. Both fall He could sue them for libel. Clearly they have, or should have, seen the video, but still chose to defame him.	/r/MensRights	24/04/13 06:29 AM
1	We're a separate species now? Not a woman, but I was there when the obstetrician yanked my son out of my partner with forceps, after slicing her open. If you think that's the same as taking a big shit, you're a fucking moron. Your lame attempts at personal insults is the only sad thing here.	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 07:33 PM
0	We're a separate species now? When was the last time you had to have your anus cut two inches, then sewn back up, to take a shit?	/r/MensRights	17/04/13 07:16 AM
3	4-year-old boy tries to kiss a female classmate on the playground without asking the girl first. Dad tells him that he can't do that "because that is rape" and then writes a blog post patting himself That article was fucking traumatising.	/r/MensRights	16/04/13 05:35 AM
1	Teachers union supports compulsory boy-humiliation class: "As educators, teachers are in an ideal position to challenge sexism and gender stereotyping, helping girls and young women to feel confident Propaganda suggests deliberate misinformation. Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. Reading the article make me think she just doesn't realise it's not solely, nor even predominantly men creating this culture. She is either in denial or just has no capacity to critically appraise the origins of sexually objectifying material. The exception being porn.	/r/MensRights	16/04/13 05:16 AM
0	Will feminism inadvertently (along with no fault divorce) free men from marriage? If there's a "toxic cunt" it's probably the guy calling people "toxic cunts". There are plenty of constructive and positive threads on this sub, I don't think this is one of them. Informed debate is good. Lose the 'informed' and you don't have much. Source? < 1 minute of Googling gave this one.	/r/MensRights	15/04/13 04:37 AM
0	Will feminism inadvertently (along with no fault divorce) free men from marriage? So you think online discourse has no effect on people's opinions and thus actions? You don't think marriage can change or adapt anymore? It certainly isn't what it once was. You don't think men can learn not to accept manipulative relationships? You think men are all passive, doing nothing to get what they want out of relationships? You think I want a passive little princess, or that obedience has anything to do with an adult relationship? I pity you. High divorce rates may mean that traditional…	/r/MensRights	14/04/13 09:55 PM
1	Will feminism inadvertently (along with no fault divorce) free men from marriage? Clearly OP (and many others here) are demonstrating no objectivity. I'm almost thinking it's trolling, juveniles or people that are just bitter about their lives. They may have good cause to be unhappy, like unfair custody settlements, or abusive relationships where feminism was an excuse for poor behaviour. I don't know. But none of this blaming is helping anyone achieve real equality for everyone.	/r/MensRights	14/04/13 01:08 PM
1	Peculiar subway ad [x-post r/nyc] My mistake. I thought your reply was in response to my other comment. They are just using marriage as a concise term for long-term commitment. It's an ad, they have limited space and readers have a limited attention span. Your answer still doesn't support your point. I think they are only trying to highlight the fact that it's very difficult to have children by yourself.	/r/MensRights	27/03/13 12:31 PM
1	Peculiar subway ad [x-post r/nyc] That was my point. I'm in the same boat as your grandparents.	/r/MensRights	27/03/13 09:46 AM
2	Peculiar subway ad [x-post r/nyc] How?	/r/MensRights	27/03/13 03:17 AM
54	Peculiar subway ad [x-post r/nyc] Sure it seems biased on the surface but I think they're jut trying to make it easy to digest: More birth control options are available to females so it makes sense to make an ad targeting them. You don't accuse people of being likely to destroy a relationship, so you use the fear of the other parent leaving. It's often the case that the responsibility of child care falls on a woman, at least initially for biological reasons, but also for social ones. I'm not debating whether it should stay that …	/r/MensRights	27/03/13 03:15 AM
1	Rape investigations should proceed with assumption that men are guilty; believing that the allegation is false and should be proven is a "misplaced belief". So all psychological studies that use such methods are just hearsay? No, because hearsay is one person's recollection of another's information, not their record of it.	/r/MensRights	14/03/13 06:32 AM
5	Rape investigations should proceed with assumption that men are guilty; believing that the allegation is false and should be proven is a "misplaced belief". "Hearsay" literally means repeating something you heard from someone else. That's it. Judicial systems are only interested in the original "sayer", i.e. the witness, victim or perpetrator.	/r/MensRights	13/03/13 07:45 PM
2	Man raped up to eight times a day in prison for 19 months, infected with HIV: "At that point I didn’t give a damn, I was broken, I was broken physically, mentally, I had nothing left I had no spirit a That's the kinda thing that would make a guy want to burn it to the ground with everyone in it. I'm impressed by his courage to speak out.	/r/MensRights	20/02/13 04:57 PM
2	I'm following this #INeedMasculismBecause trend on Twitter, and so far here's my favorite one *weighed in	/r/MensRights	08/02/13 08:02 PM
1	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. Your point was that it isn't a man's choice to procreate. You know how babies are made, right? Sure, the final say is in the woman's hands, but saying it's only the woman's choice is a bit naive.	/r/MensRights	08/02/13 11:56 AM
1	Lesbian women report more rape, physical violence, or stalking by a partner than straight women Being in the closet? Not identifying as a lesbian earlier in life when they were the victim of violence?	/r/MensRights	08/02/13 11:48 AM
-1	Lesbian women report more rape, physical violence, or stalking by a partner than straight women Exactly, but it's not 100% as OP's title text would have you believe.	/r/MensRights	07/02/13 11:19 AM
19	Lesbian women report more rape, physical violence, or stalking by a partner than straight women You're missing a very important part of the picture. Those figures only show the prevalence of being a victim of violence by orientation. You seem to have assumed that the orientation's preferred partner gender is the same as the gender of all the people committing violent acts. From the same study (and the same page!): Sex of Perpetrator of Intimate Partner Violence Most bisexual and heterosexual women (89.5% and 98.7%, respectively) reported having only male perpetrators of intimate partner vi…	/r/MensRights	07/02/13 05:42 AM
1	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. Are you insane? Having unprotected sex with a woman is not a man choosing to procreate?	/r/MensRights	05/02/13 03:46 AM
0	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. I don't think you know what straw man means. Your original attempt to analogise was poor. Being horrendously overweight directly affects your immediate physical attractiveness. Having children from a previous relationship does not and may or may not effect your overall attractiveness, depending on your circumstances. Hence, straw man. I'm not sure you know what stereotyping means, either. If someone made it clear they didn't consider me an option primarily because I had kids, then thinking "they…	/r/MensRights	03/02/13 01:33 AM
0	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. You have totally missed my point. I'm sure I would be passed over and I wouldn't be sore about it because, obviously, they wouldn't be the kind of person I was after. I just think that stereotyping, like others in this thread seem so happy to do, is not benefitting anyone.	/r/MensRights	02/02/13 08:20 AM
0	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. Straw men don't belong here.	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 06:28 AM
1	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. I'm not saying they shouldn't. I'm saying that I would hope they would put more thought into their decisions than Bumbbeardedclams is advocating.	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 06:28 AM
1	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. And fathers often show a history of irresponsible breeding habits. I know plenty, including my own father. That statement is pretty baseless. I don't agree that generally single fathers are victims of circumstance. It takes two to maintain a relationship. You think single father's aren't sizing up potential mates for their abilities to care for their existing children?	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 06:25 AM
-1	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. You're being just as sexist as the image. By your reasoning, no women without children should date single fathers. If I was a single father, I wouldn't want to be passed over purely because I have children.	/r/MensRights	31/01/13 03:43 AM
3	I guess I'm not a man, as I refuse to raise someone else's child. It's a shitty spiel in the image, but it's never that black and white. If you had a SO that had a children from a previous relationship (e.g. if their dad died), wouldn't you want to be a father figure? Conversely, If had a SO that was with child from cheating on me, I doubt I'd want to meet the child, let alone raise it.	/r/MensRights	31/01/13 03:38 AM
1	I... I don't even... Yeah, you're right. I'm just used to my Android offering choices without enforcing them.	/r/MensRights	23/01/13 04:06 AM
2	I... I don't even... Nein, die meisten Handhelds autocorrect, wodurch es einfacher, gut geben.	/r/MensRights	23/01/13 03:35 AM
0	[x-post from /r/bestof] Eightsninestens harassed for talking to a woman. Hence "came across as", not "was a".	/r/MensRights	06/01/13 03:24 AM
2	[x-post from /r/bestof] Eightsninestens harassed for talking to a woman. Did you read the post and the comments? Dude came across as a creep.	/r/MensRights	05/01/13 03:48 PM
22	Why women lose the dating game I care. No one wins with the existence of widespread distorted beliefs about the nature of relationships and attraction.	/r/MensRights	27/12/12 02:39 PM
2	In Australia, it's not rape unless there is penetration. This is why men are often not counted in rape statistics, because vaginal rape is not validated by the legal system. do you mean "non-vaginal"?	/r/MensRights	20/12/12 05:01 AM
2	Well, they did it again, they found a way to make it our fault... He was mentally ill. By that reasoning, ovarian cancer is caused by women.	/r/MensRights	19/12/12 02:37 AM
5	It's taboo to admit it, but I wish my unborn baby wasn't a beastly boy! Did you read the comments below the article?	/r/MensRights	14/12/12 02:50 PM
5	Jezebel: Fuck You Men's Rights Activists. Sometimes I wonder who these opinion writers are writing about. It's like both extremes pick out the worst examples of the opposite extreme, and then make generalisations about entire genders. Then we give them airtime here. We should be finding more positive examples of people fighting for rights.	/r/MensRights	14/12/12 10:33 AM
1	I asked a blogger about some comments on her blog hoping for a real conversation about rape culture. Because I expect a rational conversation I used my real name and email which she has now made public, labeling me as a "Rapist waiting to happen." I'm scared for my future, please I need your advice! Uh oh. You're the DECIDER now! I wouldn't take it too seriously. With posts condoning violence based on gender alone, she has little credibility.	/r/MensRights	27/11/12 04:06 AM